Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 Concentrations of Imidacloprid and Olefin-Imidacloprid Metabolite in the Walnut Husk Maggot (Diptera:Tephritidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Several species of insects diminish the value of black walnut, which is considered a valuable economic and environmental tree species. Because imidacloprid has been used successfully against pests of other host plants, we investigated how it would impact larvae of the walnut husk maggot, Rhagoletis suavis (Loew), on black walnuts. Thus, the objective of this project was to document the concentration levels of imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid, an insecticidal metabolite of imidacloprid, within the walnut husk maggot larvae dwelling within the nut husk of fly-infested mature black walnut trees. CoreTect, a pellet formulation of imidacloprid, was applied to the soil surrounding mature black walnut trees in spring of 2011. Concentrations of both imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid were assessed in walnut husk maggot tissue using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Both imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid were detected in walnut husk maggot larvae from both the lower (11.72 ppb) and upper (9.25 ppb) strata. Olefin-imidacloprid concentrations in larvae were significantly lower in the lower stratum compared with the upper stratum, while the opposite was true when assessing concentration levels of imidacloprid. Olefin-imidacloprid concentrations were significantly lower than imidacloprid concentrations within each stratum. Populations of walnut husk maggot were significantly lower in treated trees compared to control trees indicating that imidacloprid, applied as a soil pellet, reduced populations of the walnut husk maggot.

Black walnut, Juglans nigra L., is native to eastern North America and is valued for its economic, ornamental, and ecological importance throughout the United States (Williams 1990; Harlow & Harrar 1969; Smith & Follmer 1972). Although more than 300 insect species have been associated with this valuable tree (Weber et al. 1992), only a few of these species are considered pests (Reid et al. 2004). Because walnut trees are labeled as a tree crop, the type and method of insecticides applied are restricted (Protection of Environment, Part 180 2010). Therefore, different types of insecticides, such as imidacloprid, have been studied to track the movement and concentration levels of the chemical throughout the tree and into the nut tissue, which may be consumed by humans and wildlife (Nix et al. 2013).

The walnut husk maggot, Rhagoletis suavis (Loew), is considered a minor pest of black walnut (Brooks 1921). Adults emerge in mid-July, with peak abundance in mid to late Sep. Oviposition occurs from late Aug throughout Sep (Gibson & Kearby 1978). Larvae develop inside the husk of the nut, causing premature nut drop, preventing nut maturity and affecting productivity. Maggots also cause walnut husks to become slimy and sticky, which blackens the walnut shells, making them unmarketable and the nutmeat difficult to process (Poland et al. 2006). Imidacloprid is commonly used as a foliar spray on numerous fruitproducing tree species because of its low mammalian toxicity and ability to control insect pests (Leicht 1996). For example, foliar sprays of imidacloprid produced a decline in larval populations of the walnut husk fly, R. completa Cresson, and the western cherry fruit fly, R. indifferens Curran, on cherry trees in laboratory trials (Yee & Alston 2006; Van Steenwyk et al. 2010). Imidacloprid has also been demonstrated to be effective against the apple maggot, R. pomonella (Walsh) (Hu & Prokopy 1998).

Although work has been done using imidacloprid against fruit flies in walnuts as foliar sprays (Van Steenwyk et al. 2010), limited or no work has been done using systemic soil applications of imidacloprid against the larval stage of the walnut husk maggot. In the process of conducting a research project to evaluate the concentration levels of imidacloprid and its insecticidal metabolite, olefin-imidacloprid, in walnut tissues (Nix et al. 2013), we discovered infestations of walnut husk maggots within the walnuts. Because this systemic insecticide was documented in the walnut husks during this study, the impacts of these compounds on the walnut husk maggot larvae feeding inside the husk were assessed. Thus, our objective was to assess concentrations of imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid within the tissue of the walnut husk maggot. Data documenting the concentration levels of imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid in the various tissues in the lower and upper canopy of this valuable tree will provide more information on the effect of these chemicals on insects dwelling within this tree species, as well as the concentration level retained within the edible nutmeat of black walnuts (Nix et al. 2013).

Mature black walnut trees (n = 14) were selected at the Strong Stock Farm in Knoxville, TN (N 36° 3′ 7.1526″ W 83° 47′ 23.3802″) in Apr 2011. Selected trees averaged 17.8 m (8.5 – 27.4 m) in height and 51.6 cm (25.1 – 116.1 cm) in diam breast height (dbh). Trees (n = 14) were arranged in a complete randomized block design with split plot treatments and sampling. The test consisted of 7 blocks of 2 trees per block (consisting of one imidacloprid-treated tree and one untreated control tree) and walnut samples collected from the lower and upper strata of each tree's canopy. Imidacloprid was applied using CoreTect, a systemic soil pellet containing 20% imidacloprid applied to the soil at 1 pellet per 2.5 cm of tree dbh on 20 Apr 2011. Pellets were placed ca. 30.0 cm away from the trunk and buried ca. 5.0 cm deep in the soil encircling the tree. Temperature averaged 19.0 °C (5.0–29.4) and rainfall averaged 0.9 cm (0–9.0)/day for the immediate 2 weeks post-application.

Two mature nuts were collected from the lower stratum (below ca. 5 m) (n = 28) and 2 from the upper stratum (above ca. 5 m) (n = 28) 5 months posttreatment on 27 Sep 2011. This study was part of a companion study investigating imidacloprid concentrations in tree tissue (Nix et al. 2013). Mature walnuts (n = 56) were collected with a 10-m pole pruner, sealed in plastic bags, packed in ice, taken to the laboratory, and stored in a freezer at -18 °C until chemical extraction. Larvae were removed from the husk, dried, shredded, weighed, and placed into 1-g unit vials for chemical analysis. The number of larvae per walnut sample were counted and recorded. Imidacloprid and olefinimidacloprid concentrations (ppb) in only the larvae were determined using high pressure liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS) (Schöning & Schmuck 2003). Concentrations in plant tissue types were earlier documented in a companion study by Nix et al. (2013) and were compared with concentrations in walnut husk maggot larval tissue to increase our understanding of insecticide translocation in this system. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilks W test for normality and Levene's test of homogeneity of variances to verify that chemical concentration data conformed to the assumptions of analysis of variance (ANOVA). ANOVA was performed to detect differences (P = 0.05) among imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid concentrations in the tree strata as well as differences among numbers of walnut husk maggots among strata and treatments. The least significant differences (LSD) procedure was used to determine significant differences (P = 0.05) among mean concentrations of imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid in larvae collected in the upper and lower tree strata, as well as differences among numbers of walnut husk maggot between treatments and tree strata (SAS Institute 2005).

Mean imidacloprid concentration levels in walnut husk maggot larvae differed significantly (F = 1.42; df 1, 3; P < 0.05) by stratum (Fig. 1). Imidacloprid concentrations were significantly higher (LSD test; P < 0.05) in larvae collected from the lower stratum (11.72 ppb) than larvae in the upper stratum (9.25 ppb). However, imidacloprid concentrations were lower in walnut husk maggot specimens (11.72 ppb) in the lower stratum than in the walnut husk (56.40 ppb) and nutmeat (84.06 ppb) as reported earlier in a companion study by Nix et al. (2013). In addition, imidacloprid concentrations were lower in larvae (9.25 ppb) collected from the upper stratum compared with concentration levels found in the upper walnut husk (11.79 ppb) and nutmeat (72.19 ppb) samples (Nix et al. 2013). The detection of these residues in the larvae infers movement of the insecticidal materials from plant tissue into the pest feeding on these tissues.

Concentration levels of olefin-imidacloprid in larvae were also significantly different between stratum (F = 1.42; df 1, 3; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). However, and in contrast to imidacloprid, olefin-imidacloprid concentrations in larvae, were significantly lower (LSD test; P < 0.05) in the lower stratum than the upper stratum. This converse pattern is consistent with earlier studies on olefin-imidacloprid concentrations in eastern hemlock that were documented to increase as imidacloprid concentrations decrease (Dilling et al. 2010; Coots et al. 2013). They noted the possible breakdown of the insecticide over time as it translocated from the lower to upper canopy. Additionally, olefin-imidacloprid concentrations were significantly lower (LSD test; P < 0.05) than imidacloprid concentrations within each stratum. As with imidacloprid when compared with nutmeat and husk tissue data from a companion study (Nix et al. 2013), walnut husk maggot larvae had lower levels of olefin-imidacloprid in both strata. These data are in agreement with the progressive increase of olefin-imidacloprid concentrations over time as imidacloprid concentrations decrease over time as reported for eastern hemlock (Leicht 1996; Dilling et al. 2010; Nix et al. 2013). It is plausible that the higher olefin-imidacloprid levels in the upper stratum compared to lower stratum are a result of metabolism of imidacloprid in the upper stratum resulting in the observed decreased imidacloprid concentration in the upper stratum.

Fig. 1.

Impact of insecticide treatment and tree stratum on mean (± SE) concentration (ppb) of imidacloprid and olefin-imidacloprid in walnut husk maggot. Means (n = 28 total nuts per stratum) followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (LSD test; P > 0.05).

f01_1848.jpg

All walnuts sampled contained at least one walnut husk maggot larva. Imidacloprid treatments impacted walnut husk maggot populations throughout the canopy, as the mean number of larvae in walnuts was significantly lower (F = 68.00; df 3, 24; P < 0.0001) in nuts from the lower stratum of imidacloprid-treated trees compared to untreated controls (Fig. 2). There were 50% fewer larvae in walnuts in the upper stratum (average of 3.0, range of 2.0–4.0), and 67% fewer larvae in the lower stratum of imidacloprid-treated trees (average of 2.0, range of 1.0–3.0) when compared to control trees. Additionally, the abundance of walnut husk maggot larvae (n = 106) in the lower stratum was significantly different from the abundance of larvae (n = 132) in the upper stratum of treated and untreated trees (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2.

Impact of insecticide treatment on the mean number (± SE) of individual walnut husk maggots within each stratum. Means (n = 28 total nuts per stratum) with the same letters are not significantly different (LSD test; P > 0.05).

f02_1848.jpg

While the systemic use of imidacloprid in the form of a soil pellet is not recommended for control of any pest of black walnut, these data may be useful in understanding the movement of imidacloprid through other species of mast-bearing hardwood species and potential impact to insects feeding on those host trees.

We extend our special thanks to Strong Stock Farm, Knoxville, TN, USA, for use of the study site, and to Josh Grant (Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN) and Jeremy Nix for their assistance in collecting and processing samples. This study was funded in part by a grant from the USDA Forest Service.

References Cited

1.

F. E. Brooks 1921. Walnut husk maggot, USDA Bull. No. 992. Washington, D. C. 8 pp. Google Scholar

2.

C. I. Coots , P. L. Lambdin , J. F. Grant , and J. R. Rhea 2013. Spatial and temporal distribution of residues of imidacloprid and its insecticidal 5-hydroxy and olefin and metabolites in eastern hemlock (Pinales: Pinaceae) in the southern Appalachians. J. Econ. Entomol. 106: 2399–2406. Google Scholar

3.

C. I. Dilling; P. L. Lambdin; J. F. Grant, and J. R. Rhea 2010. Spatial and temporal distribution of imidacloprid in eastern hemlock in the Southern Appalachians. J. Econ. Entomol. 103: 368–373. Google Scholar

4.

K. Gibson , and W. H. Kearby 1978. Seasonal life history of the walnut husk fly and husk maggot in Missouri. Environ. Entomol. 7: 81–87. Google Scholar

5.

W. Harlow , and E. Harrar 1969. Textbook of Dendrology, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.213 p. Google Scholar

6.

X.P. Hu , and J. Prokopy 1998. Lethal and sublethal effects of imidacloprid on apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella Walsh (Diptera, Tephritidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 122: 37–42. Google Scholar

7.

W. Leicht 1996. Imidacloprid, a chloronicotinyl insecticide: Biological activity and agricultural significance. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 42: 71–84. Google Scholar

8.

K. Nix , P. Lambdin , J. Grant , C. Coots , and P. Merten 2013. Concentration levels of imidacloprid and dinotefuran in five tissue types of black walnut, Juglans nigra. Forests 4: 887–897. Google Scholar

9.

T. M. Poland , R. A. Haack , T. R. Petrice , D. L. Miller , L. S. Bauer , and R. Gao 2006. Field evaluations of systemic insecticides for control of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in China. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 383–392. Google Scholar

10.

EPA (Us Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. Protection of Environment; Part 180—Tolerances and Exemptions for Pesticide Chemical Residues i Food; Subpart C-Specific Tolerances—180.472 Imidacloprid; Tolerances for Residues, 2010. Office of the Federal Register. Available online:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol23/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol23-sec180-472.pdf (accessed on 1-III-2013). Google Scholar

11.

W. Reid , M. V. Coggeshall , and K. L. Hunt 2004. Cultivar Evaluation and Development for Black Walnut Orchards, pp. 18–24 In Black Walnut in a New Century, Proc. 6th Walnut Council Res. Symp., Lafayette, IN, USA. Google Scholar

12.

SAS Institute. 2005. SAS User's Guide; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 276 pp. Google Scholar

13.

R. Schöning , and R. Schmuck 2003. Analytical determination of imidacloprid and relevant metabolite residues by LC/MS/MS. Bull. Insectol. 56: 41–50. Google Scholar

14.

C. C. Smith , and D. Follmer 1972. Food preferences of squirrels. Ecol. 53: 82–91. Google Scholar

15.

R. A. Van Steenwyk , S .K. Zolbrod , R. M. Nomoto , J. K. Hasey , J. A. Grant , W. W. Coates , and R. B. Elkins 2010. Walnut husk fly control with reduced risk insecticides. Acta Hort. 861: 375–382. Google Scholar

16.

B. C. Weber , R. L. Anderson , and W. H. Hoffard 1992. How to Diagnose Black Walnut Damage. General Technical Report NC-57, USDA-Forest Service: St. Paul, MN, USA. 20 pp. Google Scholar

17.

R. D. Williams 1990. Juglans nigra L.: black walnut, pp. 391–399 In R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala [eds.], Silvics of North America: Vol. 2, Hardwoods. Agric. Handbook 654. USDA-Forest Service, Washington DC. Google Scholar

18.

W. L. Yee , and D. G. Alston 2006. Effects of spinosad, spinosad bait, and chloronicotinyl insecticides on mortality and control of adult and larval western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 1722–1732. Google Scholar
Katheryne Nix, Carla Coots, Paris Lambdin, Jerome Grant, David Paulsen, Greg Wiggins, and Paul Merten "Concentrations of Imidacloprid and Olefin-Imidacloprid Metabolite in the Walnut Husk Maggot (Diptera:Tephritidae)," Florida Entomologist 97(4), 1848-1851, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0465
Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top