Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2015 Seasonal Abundance and Diversity of Arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabales: Fabaceae) Trees as Windbreaks in the Cerrado
F. W. S. Silva, G. L. D. Leite, R. E. M. Guañabens, R. A. Sampaio, C. A. G. Gusmão, J. E. Serrão, J. C. Zanuncio
Author Affiliations +

Our aim was to assess the seasonal abundance and diversity of arthropods on Acacia mangium Willd. (Fabales: Fabaceae) trees. Phytophagous arthropods, natural enemies and pollinators were quantified biweekly in 20 trees during 3 years. The Shannon biodiversity index (H') of arthropods was greater in the summer and smaller in the winter and spring on A. magium. The diversities of species and abundances of individuals of all arthropod taxa were greater in the autumn and smaller in the winter and in the spring. The H' index of arthropods was greater in 2005 and smaller in 2007. The diversity of species and abundance of individuals of phytophagous taxa were greater in 2005 and 2006, respectively, whereas those of natural enemies and pollinators was greater in 2006. Aethalion reticulatum L. (Hemiptera: Aetalionidae) was the most abundant phytophagous species found in the various seasons, while Camponotus sp.2 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Trigona spinipes Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponini), Tetragonisca angustula Latreille (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae, Meliponini) and Polistes sp. (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) were the most abundant natural enemies and pollinators. The great diversity of predators on this tree species can explain the little damage to its leaves. These results may be applied to support programs of pest control and maintenance of natural enemies and pollinators in future plantations of A. mangium.

Distributions of arthropod species may differ in different years in response to changes in climate and food availability, which may directly impact their abundances and diversity (Wolda 1988; Chilima & Leather 2001; Leite et al. 2005). In tropical areas with well-defined dry and wet seasons, the population dynamics of many insect species is influenced by climatic changes, which probably cause changes in the physiology of the host plants (Hamer et al. 2005; Leite et al. 2006a).

The abundance and diversity of arthropods may be greater in some developmental stage of the host plant. The nutritional quality and chemical defenses of plants, which are linked to the age of leaves, are important for phytophagous insects (Bowers & Stamp 1993; Coley & Barone 1996; Leite et al. 2006b). Acacia mangium Willd. (Fabales: Fabaceae) is a pioneer species that can grow on acid and infertile soils due to its capacity of N-fixing (Galiana et al. 1998), with this nutrient being one of the most important for the tree growth (Lea & Azevedo 2006).

Interactions between plants of Acacia spp. and insects have been studied (Fleming et al. 2007; McLeish et al. 2007; Palmer et al. 2007; Silva et al. 2014), and insects are the main organisms responsible for the decline of Arabic gum production from these trees in Sudan (Jamal 1994). The main herbivores found damaging A. mangium were leafcutter ants (Atta spp. and Acromyrmex spp.), termites and Costalimaita ferruginea Fabr. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Arco-Verde 2002) in the northern Brazil, and Trigona spinipes Fabr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Aethalion reticulatum (Hemiptera: Aetalionidae) and Pentatomidae sp. 1 (Hemiptera) in southeastern Brazil (Silva et al. 2014).

Acacia spp. are broadly used in the initial restoration process of degraded lands (Tsai 1988; Yu & Li 2007), in places where initially a number of barriers prevent plant development (Chada et al. 2004). Moreover, they are also used as windbreaks to prevent wind and water erosion (Michels et al. 1998; Bird et al. 2002) and as barriers to movements of arthropods (Rao et al. 2000).

The aim of this study was to assess the seasonal abundance and diversity of arthropods during 3 years of sampling on A. mangium trees.

Materials and Methods


This study was carried out in a pasture area of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (ICA/ UFMG), Brazil. Samplings occurred from Jan 2005 to Mar 2007 in an area with an Aw climate, i.e., tropical savanna according to the classification of Köppen with a dry winter and a rainy summer and a dystrophic red-yellow latosol.


Windbreaks, 100 m long with 2 rows of A. mangium spaced 3 × 3 m were used. Saplings were prepared in a nursery and planted in Sep 2003 in 30 × 30 × 30 cm holes with 360 grams of natural reactive phosphate mixed into the subsoil of a Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. (Poales: Poaceae) pasture. The phytophagous, natural enemies and pollinators arthropods in twenty 16-month old A. mangium trees were visually counted biweekly every yr. The arthropods were counted on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces in the upper, median and smaller apical canopy on branches facing north, south, east and west; and with a total of 12 leaves per canopy and 9 per tree branch position in each sampling. Arthropod collection also occurred on the trunks of 20 trees per sampling. All material collected was stored in flasks with 70% ethanol, separated by morphospecies and sent for identification. The climatic data (rainfall, temperature, relative humidity, solar irradiation and wind speed) were obtained from the Main Climatic Station of Montes Claros of the 5th DISME-INMET.


The natural enemies and pollinators were grouped as evaluating them separately would not meet the requirements of the tests. The ecological indices (number of individuals, richness, diversity and abundance of species) were calculated for the arthropod species identified. All ecological indices were measured by calculating the dataset of taxa by samples in BioDiversity Pro Version 2 software. Diversity was calculated by the Shannon-Weaver formula: H' = pi ln (pi). Abundance and species richness (S) were calculated by the Simpson formula: D = (ni /N) * 100, where: pi = ni /N; ni = number of individuals per species; N = total number of individuals; S = richness (number of species). k-Dominance were calculated by plotting the percentage cumulative abundance against log species rank (Lambshead et al. 1983). The kdominance values indicate the dominance and evenness distribution of individuals among species (Gee et al. 1985). The Spearman correlation was applied for the data (P < 0.05).

Results and Discussion

A total of 418 individuals of phytophagous arthropods were sampled, with Hemiptera having the greatest diversity (4 species, 4 genera, 7 families and 4 unidentified species), followed by Coleoptera (1 species, 2 genera, 2 families and 1 unidentified species), Orthoptera (1 species, 1 genus, 2 families and 1 unidentified species), Lepidoptera (1 genus, 1 family and 1 unidentified species) and Diptera (1 genus and 1 family). Aethalion reticulatum L. (Hemiptera: Aetalionidae) was the most abundant phytophagous species on A. mangium trees during the various seasons of the year (Figs. 1 and 2). Aethalion reticulatum feed on plant sap, which can affect the development of fruits and sprouting, and at high infestations, kill the plant (Silva et al. 2007; Vanin et al. 2008).

A total of 1,148 specimens of natural enemies and pollinators arthropods were sampled. The greatest diversity was found in the Hymenoptera (4 species, 8 genera, 3 families and 3 morphospecies), followed by Araneae (2 species, 2 genera, 3 families and 1 unidentified species), Coleoptera (1 species, 1 genus, 2 families and 1 unidentified species), Neuroptera (1 species, 1 genus, 1 family and 1 unidentified species), Mantodea (1 species, 1 genus and 1 family) and Hemiptera (1 unidentified species). The most abundant natural enemies and pollinators were Camponotus sp. 2 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Trigona spinipes Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponini), Tetragonisca angustula Latreille (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae, Meliponini) and Polistes sp. (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) (Figs. 1 and 2). Despite species of the genus Camponotus being known as predators (or natural enemies) (Cortez et al. 2012), they are also found tending sucking insects, such as A. reticulatum (Brown 1976); protecting them against predators and parasitoids (Renault et al. 2005). Camponotus sp. 1 was correlated positively with A. reticulatum (r = 0.37), so this could explain the greatest abundance of this phytophage on A. mangium. Therefore, Camponotus sp. 1 can indirectly affect host plants by hindering the impact of other natural enemies. However, T. angustula and T. spinipes are important for pollination and for increasing the genetic variability of plants (Proni & Macieira 2004; Costa et al. 2008). Polistes spp. are important predators of different species, mainly lepidopterans (Prezoto et al. 2006).

Arthropods had the greatest H' index in 2005, and the smallest H' in 2007 (Table 1). The greatest number of species and individuals of phytophages was observed in 2005 and 2006, respectively; while natural enemies and pollinators had the greatest number of species and individuals in 2006 (Table 1). The phytophages had the greatest H' index in 2005 owing the presence of rare species, leading thus to greater equitability between number of species and abundance of individuals. This might have occurred owing to the initial colonization stage of different phytophagous arthropod species in the first year of the study. Linzmeier & Ribeiro-Costa (2008) found a similar colonization pattern for species of Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the first year of study in an Araucaria (Pinales: Araucariaceae) forest.

The smallest H' index may be explained by the reduced number of rare species in the second year when other likely more adapted species to A. mangium were predominant. The natural enemies had the greatest H' index in 2005 and the greatest number of species and individuals in 2006, likely owing to a greater abundance of phytophages in the second year, as observed in the positive correlation between phytophages and their natural enemies (r = 0.45), in agreement with other studies (Donaldson et al. 2007; Öberg et al. 2008; Philpott et al. 2008; Venturino et al. 2008). In general, natural enemies (such as spiders in this study) have greater population densities in more complex habitats (Bragança et al. 1998; Landis et al. 2000) in response to more favorable microclimates and reductions of cannibalism and competition (Ramalho et al. 2007).

Table 1.

Shannon (H') biodiversity indices of phytophagous and natural enemies + pollinators arthropods, number of leaves per branch and number of branches per tree of Acacia mangium. Climatic data during 3 years of sampling.


The increase in number of phytophagous arthropods in the second year is likely due to the greatest number of branches and leaves present on A. mangium trees, which implies an enhanced food resource (Table 1). Other studies have also found this same positive correlation between phytophagous arthropods and complexity of plant architecture (Lara et al. 2008; Obermaier et al. 2008; Sinclair & Hughes 2008). Another possibility is that temperature, rainfall and wind speed had smaller values in 2006 than in 2005 (Table 1), which could have favored some phytophagous, natural enemies and pollinators. This is shown by the negative correlation between temperature (r = -0.44) and rainfall (r = -0.32) with A. reticulatum; temperature with phytophagous arthropods (Hemiptera) (r = -0.42); T. spinipes with temperature (r = - 0.56) and wind speed (r = -0.44); and Camponotus sp. 1 with temperature (r = -0.44). The wind speed found here (over 2.0 m/s) might negatively affect visits of bees (such as of T. spinipes) to flowers (Dutra & Machado 2001).

In the first year, the greatest number of some natural enemies, such as Camponotus sp. 2, Camponotus sp. 5, Polistes spp. and spiders on A. mangium trees (Table 1 and Fig. 1) might have negatively affected the number of phytophages, as indicated by the negative correlation between Camponotus sp. 2 and A. reticulatum (r = -0.41). Some studies have reported Camponotus sp. as important natural enemy in the system (Prezoto et al. 2006; Philpott et al. 2008). This negative correlation between Camponotus sp. 2 and A. reticulatum may also be a result of competition with Camponotus sp. 1, which is reported as frequently tending this hemipteran trophobiont (see the positive correlation above). Thus, Camponotus sp. 2 and 5 could be expelled from plants hosting Camponotus sp. 1 and A. reticulatum.

Fig. 1.

Abundance of phytophagous, natural enemies and pollinators arthropods on Acacia mangium trees during 3 years of sampling. Samplings occurred from 2005 to 2007.


All arthropod species had greater Shannon (H') biodiversity indices in the summer than in the winter and spring (Table 1). We found a greater number of species and greater abundance of individual arthropod species in the autumn than in the winter and spring, respectively (Table 1). The greatest diversity of phytophagous arthropods may be associated with the availability of resources in the wetter seasons (Wolda 1978). In biomes with well-defined seasons (such as dry and wet in the Cerrado), because population densities and herbivory rates decrease in the dry season (winter) and increase gradually during the wet season (summer) (Tanaka & Tanaka 1982; Coley & Barone 1996). This implies that phytophagous arthropods thrive when present during seasons when trees have new leaves (Wolda 1978), and as observed in this work, when A. mangium had more grown leaves in the summer and fewer in the winter (Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Abundance of phytophagous, natural enemies and pollinators arthropods on Acacia mangium trees according to the climate seasons. Samplings occurred from 2005 to 2007.


The greatest abundance of phytophagous arthropods in the autumn is likely due to the effect of herbivore concentration during seasons in which A. mangium has few leaves (Table 1). This was also found for other tree species such as Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. (Fabales: Fabaceae) in the same biome (Almeida et al. 2006). Whereas abundance of natural enemies and pollinators seems to vary according to the phytophagous population density, because their abundance is maximal in the autumn during the peak of population density of phytophages (r = 0.45) (Table 1), and minimal in the spring after the decrease of prey availability (Donaldson et al. 2007; Öberg et al. 2008; Philpott et al. 2008; Venturino et al. 2008).

In conclusion, the diversity of natural enemies and pollinators on A. mangium trees varies according to the population density of phytophagous arthropods. The diversity of natural enemies may explain the small damage on leaves and flowers of this tree species. Finally, control strategies of phytophagous arthropods should be implemented whenever needed at the beginning of tree development and/or in the wet season.


We wish to thank Dr Antônio Domingos Brescovit (Instituto Butantã) (Aracnidae), Dr Ayr de Moura Bello (Coleoptera), Dr Ivan Cardoso Nascimento (CEPLAC) (Formicidae), Dr Paulo Sérgio Fiuza Ferreira (UFV) (Hemiptera) and Dr Luci Boa Nova Coelho (UFRJ) (Cicadellidae) for species identification. We also wish to thank “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)” and “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)”.

References Cited


CIM Almeida , GLD Leite , SL Rocha , MML Machado , WCH Maldonado . 2006. Fenologia e artrópodes de Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. no cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais 8: 64–70. Google Scholar


MF Arco-Verde . 2002. Potencialidades e usos da Acacia mangium Willd. no estado de Roraima, pp. 18. In Embrapa-Roraima [ed.], Boa Vista. Google Scholar


PR Bird , TT Jackson , GA Kearney , KW Williams . 2002. Effect of two tree windbreaks on adjacent pastures in south-western Victoria, Australia. Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42: 809–830. Google Scholar


MD Bowers , NE Stamp . 1993. Effects of plant-age, genotype, and herbivory on plantago performance and chemistry. Ecology 74: 1778–1791. Google Scholar


M Bragança , O DeSouza , JC Zanuncio . 1998. Environmental heterogeneity as a strategy for pest management in Eucalyptus plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 102: 9–12. Google Scholar


RL Brown . 1976. Behavioral observations on Aethalion reticulatum (Hem, Aethalionidae) and associated ants. Insectes Sociaux 23: 99–107. Google Scholar


SdS Chada , EFC Campello , SMd Faria . 2004. Sucessão vegetal em uma encosta reflorestada com leguminosas arbóreas em Angra dos Reis, RJ. Revista Árvore 28: 801–809. Google Scholar


CZ Chilima , SR Leather . 2001. Within-tree and seasonal distribution of the pine woolly aphid Pineus boerneri on Pinus kesiya trees. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 3: 139–145. Google Scholar


PD Coley , JA Barone . 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 27: 305–335. Google Scholar


V Cortez , ME Favila , JR Verdu , AJ Ortiz . 2012. Behavioral and antennal electrophysiological responses of a predator ant to the pygidial gland secretions of two species of Neotropical dung roller beetles. Chemoecology 22: 29–38. Google Scholar


AJC Costa , F Guimarães-Dias , R Pérez-Maluf . 2008. Abelhas (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) visitantes das flores de urucum em Vitória da Conquista, BA. Ciência Rural 38: 534–537. Google Scholar


JR Donaldson , SW Myers , C Gratton . 2007. Density-dependent responses of soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) populations to generalist predators in mid to late season soybean fields. Biological Control 43: 111–118. Google Scholar


JCS Dutra , VLL Machado . 2001. Entomofauna visitante de Stenolobium stans (Juss.) Seem (Bignoniaceae), durante seu período de floração. Neotropical Entomology 30: 43–53. Google Scholar


PA Fleming , SD Hofmeyr , SD Nicolson . 2007. Role of insects in the pollination of Acacia nigrescens (Fabaceae). South African Journal of Botany 73: 49–55. Google Scholar


JM Gee , RM Warwick , M Schaanning , JA Berge , WG Ambrose . 1985. Effects of organic enrichment on meiofaunal abundance and community structure in sublittoral soft sediments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 91: 247–262. Google Scholar


KC Hamer , JK Hill , N Mustaffa , S Benedick , TN Sherratt , VK Chey , M Maryati . 2005. Temporal variation in abundance and diversity of butterflies in Bornean rain forests: opposite impacts of logging recorded in different seasons. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 417–425. Google Scholar


A Jamal . 1994. Major insect pests of gum arabic trees Acacia senegal Willd and Acacia seyal L in Western Sudan. Journal of Applied Entomology 117: 10–20. Google Scholar


PJD Lambshead , HM Platt , KM Shaw . 1983. The detection of differences among assemblages of marine benthic species based on an assessment of dominance and diversity. Journal of Natural History 17: 859–874. Google Scholar


DA Landis , SD Wratten , GM Gurr . 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201. Google Scholar


DP Lara , LA Oliveira , IFP Azevedo , MF Xavier , FAO Silveira , MAA Carneiro , GW Fernandes . 2008. Relationships between host plant architecture and gall abundance and survival. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52: 78–81. Google Scholar


PJ Lea , RA Azevedo . 2006. Nitrogen use efficiency. 1. Uptake of nitrogen from the soil. Annals of Applied Biology 149: 243–247. Google Scholar


GLD Leite , M Picanço , GN Jham , MD Moreira . 2005. Whitefly population dynamics in okra plantations. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40: 19–25. Google Scholar


GLD Leite , M Picanço , JC Zanuncio , CC Ecole . 2006a. Factors affecting herbivory of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera : Thripidae) and Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae) on the eggplant (Solanum melongena). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 49: 361–369. Google Scholar


GLD Leite , RVdS Veloso , JC Zanuncio , LA Fernandes , CIM Almeida . 2006b. Phenology of Caryocar brasiliense in the Brazilian cerrado region. Forest Ecology and Management 236: 286–294. Google Scholar


AM Linzmeier , CS Ribeiro-Costa . 2008. Seasonality and temporal structuration of Alticini community (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae) in the Araucaria Forest of Parana, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52: 289–295. Google Scholar


MJ McLeish , TW Chapman , MP Schwarz . 2007. Host-driven diversification of gallinducing Acacia thrips and the aridification of Australia. BMC Biology 5: 3. Google Scholar


K Michels , JPA Lamers , A Buerkert . 1998. Effects of windbreak species and mulching on wind erosion and millet yield in the sahel. Experimental Agriculture 34: 449–464. Google Scholar


S Öberg , S Mayr , J Dauber . 2008. Landscape effects on recolonisation patterns of spiders in arable fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123: 211–218. Google Scholar


E Obermaier , A Heisswolf , J Poethke , B Randlkofer , T Meiners . 2008. Plant architecture and vegetation structure: Two ways for insect herbivores to escape parasitism. European Journal of Entomology 105: 233–240. Google Scholar


WA Palmer , CJ Lockett , KADW Senaratne , A McLennan . 2007. The introduction and release of Chiasmia inconspicua and C. assimilis (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) for the biological control of Acacia nilotica in Australia. Biological Control 41: 368–378. Google Scholar


SM Philpott , I Perfecto , J Vandermeer . 2008. Behavioral diversity of predatory arboreal ants in coffee agroecosystems. Environmental Entomology 37: 181–191. Google Scholar


F Prezoto , HH Santos-Prezoto , VLL Machado , JC Zanuncio . 2006. Prey captured and used in Polistes versicolor (Olivier) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) nourishment. Neotropical Entomology 35: 707–709. Google Scholar


EA Proni , OJD Macieira . 2004. Ritmo circadiano da taxa respiratória de Tetragonisca angustula fiebrigi (Schwarz), T. a. angustula (Latreille) e Trigona spinipes (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21: 987–993. Google Scholar


FDS Ramalho , A. M. Silva AMCd , JC Zanuncio , JE Serrão . 2007. Competition between Catolaccus grandis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and Bracon vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), parasitoids of the boll weevil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 50: 371–378. Google Scholar


MR Rao , MP Singh , R Day . 2000. Insect pest problems in tropical agroforestry systems: Contributory factors and strategies for management. Agroforestry Systems 50: 243–277. Google Scholar


CK Renault , LM Buffa , MA Delfino . 2005. An aphid-ant interaction: effects on different trophic levels. Ecological Research 20: 71–74. Google Scholar


FWS Silva , GLD Leite , REM Guanabens , RA Sampaio , CAG Gusmão , JC Zanuncio . 2014. Spatial distribution of arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabales: Fabaceae) trees as windbreaks in the Cerrado. Florida Entomologist 9: 631–638. Google Scholar


WC Silva , JDA Ribeiro , HEMd Souza , RdS Corrêa . 2007. Atividade inseticida de Piper aduncum L. (Piperaceae) sobre Aetalion sp. (Hemiptera: Aetalionidae), praga de importância econômica no Amazonas. Acta Amazonica 37: 293–298. Google Scholar


RJ Sinclair , L Hughes . 2008. Incidence of leaf mining in different vegetation types across rainfall, canopy cover and latitudinal gradients. Austral Ecology 33: 353–360. Google Scholar


LK Tanaka , SK Tanaka . 1982. Rainfall and seasonal changes in arthropod abundance on a tropical oceanic island. Biotropica 14: 114–123. Google Scholar


LM Tsai . 1988. Studies on Acacia mangium in Kemasul Forest, Malaysia. I. Biomass and productivity. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4: 293–302. Google Scholar


SA Vanin , CS Ramos , EF Guimarães , MJ Kato . 2008. Insect feeding preferences on Piperaceae species observed in São Paulo city, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52: 72–77. Google Scholar


E Venturino , M Isaia , F Bona , S Chatterjee , G Badino . 2008. Biological controls of intensive agroecosystems: Wanderer spiders in the Langa Astigiana. Ecological Complexity 5: 157–164. Google Scholar


H Wolda . 1978. Seasonal fluctuations in rainfall, food and abundance of tropical insects. Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 369–381. Google Scholar


H Wolda . 1988. Insect seasonality - Why? Annual Review of Ecological Systems 19: 1–18. Google Scholar


H Yu , JT Li . 2007. Physiological comparisons of true leaves and phyllodes in Acacia mangium seedlings. Photosynthetica 45: 312–316. Google Scholar
F. W. S. Silva, G. L. D. Leite, R. E. M. Guañabens, R. A. Sampaio, C. A. G. Gusmão, J. E. Serrão, and J. C. Zanuncio "Seasonal Abundance and Diversity of Arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabales: Fabaceae) Trees as Windbreaks in the Cerrado," Florida Entomologist 98(1), 170-174, (1 March 2015).
Published: 1 March 2015

enemigos naturales y polinizadores
natural enemies and pollinators
Get copyright permission
Back to Top