Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2015 Battus polydamas (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) Uses the Open-Field Aristolochia sessilifolia (Piperales: Aristolochiaceae) as Its Host Plant in Uruguayan Savanna Areas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Butterfly species with broad geographical ranges are expected to be tolerant of ecological/ environmental constraints and to shifts in host plant use. This seems to be the case of the butterfly Battus polydamas (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), which in the absence of better host plants may lay eggs on low-quality Aristolochia (Piperales: Aristolochiaceae) plants, increasing the developmental time and mortality rate of immatures. Battus polydamas populations from the Uruguayan savanna were investigated to verify whether A. sessilifolia (Klotzsch) Duch. was being used as a host plant in grassland areas where no other Aristolochia species are available. Species distribution models (SDM) for both species were built to verify whether ecological conditions could cause overlapping distributions between them. Extensive field surveys were performed to investigate whether B. polydamas actually uses A. sessilifolia as larval food source in the field. The performance of larvae on such host plant was also tested under controlled conditions in a laboratory environment. The SDM analysis showed a large overlap between the distributions of B. polydamas and A. sessilifolia. Field surveys revealed the occurrence of an interaction between the butterfly and the potential host plant, and laboratory experiments corroborated that B. polydamas larvae can successfully use A. sessilifolia as a host plant. The wide distribution of B. polydamas suggests that this butterfly species evolved the ability to develop in unfavorable environments (e.g., poor host plants, adverse climate), allowing it to use virtually all Aristolochia species of the Neotropics as host plants. Thus, adult females appear to have developed the capacity to identify any Aristolochia spp. as a suitable host plant, enabling the exploitation of various landscapes and ecoregions.

Among the several variables affecting the distribution of herbivorous Insects, the richness and abundance of host plants in different habitats are some of the most important ecological constraints to survival (Dennis et al. 2000). Herbivore species with the ability to explore a wide range of host plants are expected to have larger distributions when compared with those restricted to just a few hosts (Gaston et al. 1997). Generally, butterfly species with broad geographical ranges are expected to be more tolerant to ecological environmental constraints and to shifts of host plant use than species with smaller distributions. Therefore, with the increase in ecological specialization of the herbivores towards certain groups of plants, it is expected that the presence of an insect species in some areas would be much more influenced by the availability of food sources to immatures than by environmental constraints affecting the survival of adult forms (Dennis et al. 2005).

From the host plant selection standpoint, the choice to lay eggs on suitable food sources is one of the most important factors affecting the chances of a caterpillar developing into a viable butterfly (Chew 1977). The chemical and physical properties of different host plants, such as the concentration of nutrients and leaf toughness, may vary within and between species, producing changes in life histories (Scriber & Slansky 1981; Be mays & Chapman 1994). Another effect of nutritional quality variation of host plants is the decrease in survival caused by the extension of larval development time, which increases the exposure of larvae to predators and other natural enemies (Loader & Damman 1991). Therefore, changes in the type and quality of food may significantly alter larval performance and the priorities of resource allocation on highly monophagous species, whereas it would be less of a concern to polyphagous species (Dennis et al. 2005).

The butterfly Battus polydamas (Linnaeus, 1758) (Papilionidae: Troidini) is a broad-range species, occurring from central Argentina to southern USA. The adults are common in dry and disturbed habitats, while rare in humid forests (Tyler et al. 1994). Females lay egg clutches on about 24 Aristolochia species (Beccaloni et al. 2008), having a general preference for host plants that optimize the development of their larvae (Fagua et al. 1998). Under adverse conditions, or in the absence of better food sources to immatures, B. polydamas may lay eggs on low-quality host plants (Tyler et al. 1994), at the cost of an increase in the development time and mortality rate of immature forms (Fagua et al. 1998).

The generalist characteristic of B. polydamas, evident due to the large number of host plant species chosen by females during oviposition, suggests that many species of Aristolochia might be suitable as food sources for its larvae. Some authors have suggested that B. polydamas can, as a matter of fact, use all Neotropical Aristolochia spp. as host plants (Tyler et al. 1994), even though the suitability of various of these species has not been tested. According to Fagua et al. (1998), host plant shifts do not seem to significantly affect the survival rate of B. polydamas immatures, in spite of females showing a preference for more abundant species within their residential areas. On the other hand, the encounter-frequency theory (Southwood 1961) predicts that the use of more host plants would provide access to more biotopes, which would allow access to more resources for immatures of B. polydamas. Thus, polyphagous butterfly species could more easily adopt novel hosts and biotopes during range expansions when compared with monophagous species (Thomas et al. 2001). Therefore, it is expected that the great plasticity of B. polydamas would allow wider distributions by enhanced contact with a varied range of Aristolochia resources.

Aristolochia sessilifolia (Klotzsch) Duch. (Piperales: Aristolochiaceae) is a plant commonly found in natural grasslands from southern South America (Barros & Araújo 2013), especially in areas of the Uruguayan savanna, Espinal, and Southern Cone Mesopotamian savanna ecoregions (Olson et al. 2001). This plant species has a prostrate habit, growing in sunny open areas of dry shallow soils (Hoehne 1942). Individuals are often found in small patches from spring to autumn, suffering defoliation during winter due to frost. During the coldest months of the year the plants survive adverse conditions thanks to the perennial rhizome that promotes re-growth in the early spring. Its use as host plant by Troidini butterflies has already been observed for Euryades species (Beccaloni et al. 2008) but has never been recorded for other Troidini butterfly species.

The close association between the Troidini butterflies and the plants of the genus Aristolochia is a well-known example of coevolution between herbivores and host plants (Ehrlich & Raven 1964; Silva-Brandão & Solferini 2007; Fordyce 2010). It has been suggested that Aristolochia plants might have evolved toxic secondary compounds to avoid herbivorous attacks from insects (Ehrlich & Raven 1964; Bernays & Graham 1988; Brown et al. 1991; Nishida & Fukami 1989). On the other hand, the ecological specialization of the herbivores could have promoted the ability to neutralize the toxicity of herbivore deterrents, followed by an evolutionary step towards the sequestration of toxins to use them as chemical defense against predators (Futuyma & Keese 1992; Opitz & Müller 2009; Janz 2011; Morals et al. 2013).

Considering the generalist behavior and the broad range of B. polydamas, the populations from the Uruguayan savanna were investigated to discover whether they could be successfully using A. sessilifolia as a host plant in grassland areas, where few or no forest Aristolochia species are available. First, species distribution models (SDM) for B. polydamas and A. sessilifolia were built to verify whether ecological conditions would allow overlapping distributions between the herbivore and the host plant. Based on those SDMs, field surveys in areas where models suggested high probability of sympatry between the 2 species were performed, investigating whether B. polydamas was actually using A. sessilifolia as a larval food source in nature. Second, the performance of B. polydamas larvae on A. sessilifolia under controlled conditions was tested to assess survival and developmental constraints during the use of this host plant.

Materials and Methods

SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING

To determine whether there was overlap between the occurrence of B. polydamas and A. sessilifolia, SDMs were built for both species. The occurrence records used to build the SDMs were obtained from entomological collections, herbaria, scientific publications, and personal field observations. The environmental data used in the modeling were obtained from the bioclimatic database Worldclim (Hijmans et al. 2005) and the soil collection data sets available at ORNL-DAAC (Batjes 2000; Dunne & Willmott 2000; Global Soil Data Task Group 2000; Webb et al. 2000; Fischer et al. 2008). The environmental information for each occurrence point was obtained and subjected to a principal component analysis (PCA) to select the most significant variables for both species distributions. The most relevant PCA axis for each species distribution was selected by the inflection point observed in the Scree Plot (Gotelli & Ellison 2004). After PCA selection, the original environment variables showing the highest loading values at each axis were chosen for SDM generation. The SDMs were built applying the following algorithms: Bioclimatic Envelope (Bioclim) (Busby 1991), Malahanobis Distance (MD) (Färber & Kadmon 2003), Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) (Phillips et al. 2006), Genetic Algorithm for Rule-set Production (GARP) (Stockwell & Noble 1992), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Cortes & Vapnik 1995) using the software Open Modeller v.1.3.0 (Muñoz et al. 2009) and Maxent (Phillips et al. 2006). Each model generated was validated by an internal test, selecting 70% of the records as training data and 30% as test data, and by an external test, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The SDMs generated with different algorithms were corrected by the minimum training presence logistic threshold and joined in a consensus model for each species using DIVA-GIS v.7.5 (Hijmans et al. 2001). The locations of occurrences predicted by the SDMs for B. polydamas and A. sessilifolia were classified according to the biogeographical regions and provinces proposed by Morrone (2006) and to the South American ecoregions from Olson et al. (2001).

The niche breadth and overlapping of butterfly and host plant distributions were analyzed in the software EN M Tools v.1.4.3 (Warren et al. 2010) using the data from the SDMs. Levin's standardized niche breadth (fi01_762.gif) (Levins 1968) was estimated from consensus SDMs by measuring the uniformity of the environmental suitability throughout the distribution of each species. Thus, fi01_762.gif is Zero when all the individuals occur in only one resource state (maximum specialization, minimum niche breadth) and One when individuals occur in all resource states (minimum specialization, maximum niche breadth). Three statistics were calculated to estimate niche SDM overlapping: Schoener's D (Schoener 1968), the I-statistic (Warren et al. 2008), and Relative Rank, RR (Warren & Seifert 2011). Schoener's D relies on the assumption that the probabilities are proportional to local species densities or any other measure of relative use. On the other hand, the I-statistic is a modification of Hellinger's distance and was used to compare community composition (Legendre & Gallagher 2001). The D and I statistics were calculated by taking the difference between the species suitability score at each grid cell, after the suitabilities have been standardized so that they sum to one over the geographic space being measured. The RR is an estimate of the probability that the relative ranking of any 2 patches of habitat is the same for the 2 models.

Table 1.

Statistics obtained for each algorithm and consensus model during the internal and external tests carried out with the several species distribution models, i.e., (A) Battus polydamas, and (B) Aristolochia sessilifolia.

t01_762.gif

FIELD SURVEYS

Based on the SDMs generated, field surveys in areas with expected sympatry between the 2 species were performed to investigate if B. polydamas was, in fact, using A. sessilifolia as a host plant in the Uruguayan savanna areas. Field surveys were conducted in natural steppe areas and grasslands with livestock reared under extensive management (no forage added by sowing). Several localities of the Uruguayan savanna from latitude S 28° to latitude S 34° were selected, and transects of 500 m at each place were exhaustively surveyed. When an A. sessilifolia plant was found, the plant was inspected for eggs and immature forms of B. polydamas. If the plant harbored an immature form of B. polydamas, it was considered that the butterfly species was using it as a host plant in the inspected area. The presence of B. polydamas adults foraging in the surveyed areas was also recorded.

LABORATORY PERFORMANCE TRIALS

To analyze the performance and survivorship of B. polydamas on A. sessilifolia, laboratory trials under controlled conditions were performed. Eggs of B. polydamas were collected in the field, at Morro Santana, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State (30°04′00.6″S, 051°07′20.3″W), placed in cylindrical plastic vials (200 mL) and brought to the laboratory to be reared at constant temperature (25 ± 2 °C) and photoperiod (16:8 h L:D) in a Biochemical Oxygen Demand incubator (BOD). After hatching, larvae were placed individually in other cylindrical plastic containers with screw caps (200 mL) and fed ad libitum with cuttings of A. sessilifolia previously disinfected with 0.01% sodium hypochlorite solution. Larval development was monitored daily and vial cleaning performed during each monitoring event. Immatures of B. polydamas were also reared on Arislolochia triangularis Cham., a well-known host plant broadly used with success by B. polydamas immatures, which is present only at forest edges, using the same methodology.

In orderto analyze larval performance on A. sessilifolia, the differential immature survivorship at each instar and stage, the total develop ment time, as well as the weight of the pupae and adult size (forewing length) were measured and compared with the data obtained on A. triangularis (control data). The differential immature survivorship was calculated using a life table built for mortality observed at each instar or stage change. The development time was calculated as the number of days spent from hatching to adult emergence, and all pupae were weighed with an analytical scale at the second day after pupation. The adult size was measured with a digital caliper (0.01 mm precision) using the thorax insertion of the forewing and the R4 vein terminus as anatomical landmarks. The differential survivorship between instars and stages was compared through a χ2-test of independence. To analyze the larval development time, adult size, and pupal weight, only data from individuals that completed the whole development from egg to adult were used. Data were tested for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test) and further analyzed with t-tests.

All immatures reared during the laboratory assays that reached the adult stage were deposited as voucher specimens in the Lepidoptera Collection of the Department of Zoology (CLDZ), at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Results

SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING

The statistics for all algorithms and for the consensus models are shown in Table 1. All SDMs showed high values of accuracy and sensitivity, with low values of omission error. The consensus SDMs for both the butterfly and the host plant had high statistical significance and moderate omission errors. The consensus SDMs obtained for B. polydamas and A. sessilifolia are shown in Fig. 1. As expected, B. polydamas showed a wide range of distribution from southern South America to southern North America (B AB polydamas = 0.8319), occurring in several ecoregions of the Neotropics, which reflects the generalist trait of the species. On the other hand, A. sessilifolia had a less extensive distribution when compared with B. polydamas (B A As.essifolia = 0.6355), being restricted to savanna, altitudinal grasslands and Espinal formations located east of the Paraná River and south of the Paraguay River. The analysis of range overlapping between B. polydamas and A. sessilifolia SDMs indicated that the latter species is completely included in the potential distribution of the butterfly species (range overlap = 1.000). However, environmental suitability was not identical for both species, producing variations in the niche overlapping indexes when the whole distribution was considered (D = 0.7119, I = 0.9362, RR = 0.5254), and when information only from the Uruguayan savanna areas were used, niche overlapping indexes increased substantially (D = 0.8643, I = 0.9866, RR = 0.5974).

FIELD SURVEYS

The results from field surveys for A. sessilifolia in the Uruguayan savanna areas are shown in Table 2. In most areas of sympatric occurrence for both species, interactions were found between immature forms of B. polydamas and the host plant A. sessilifolia. Most records from the field were of eggs, arranged in clutches from 3 to 7 units, with a few records of larvae from 1st to 4th instar. During the field surveying, adult females of B. polydamas were observed inspecting and laying eggs on A. sessilifolia plants in 4 examined localities.

LABORATORY PERFORMANCE TRIALS

During laboratory trials, A. sessilifolia proved to be a suitable food source for B. polydamas larvae. Cumulative mortality during performance trials was approximately 49%, with the lowest larval mortality rates observed for the egg stage and 3rd instar (Table 3). Mortality was not uniform among the immature stages (χ2 = 94.477, P < 0.0001). Aristolochia triangularis also proved suitable as a food source for B. polydamas larvae but produced significantly lower mortality rates (χ2 = 4.352, P < 0.037). Cumulative mortality was approximately 29%, with the lowest larval mortality rates observed for the 2nd and 3rd instars (Table 3). However, mortality was not uniform through the immature stages (χ2 =31.677, P < 0.0001).

Fig. 1.

Consensus species distributions obtained by an ensemble forecasting of models consisting of 5 algorithms (Bioclim, Malahanobis Distance, MaxEnt, GARP, and SVM) using environmental data from occurrence points of (A) Battus polydamas and (B) Aristolochia sessilifolia.

f01_762.jpg

Table 2.

Localities, soil use, and geographical coordinates where field surveys were conducted to determine if Battus polydamas was using Aristolochia sessilifolia as a host plant in the Uruguayan savanna areas.

t02_762.gif

Among those immatures that completed development entirely on A. sessilifolia (N = 27), the mean time spent from egg to adult was 31.95 d (Table 4), with no significant differences between the development time for each sex (t = 0.445, P = 0.661).The average adult size was 47.61 mm, and the mean pupal weight was 1.41 g (Table 4). Females and males showed significant differences in adult size (t = -2.381, P = 0.028) but not in pupal weight (t = -1.152, P = 0.264). The immatures that fully completed development on A. triangularis (N = 38), spent 31.37 d to go from egg to adult (Table 4), with no significant differences between the development time for each sex (t = 0.168, P = 0.868).The average adult size was 47.41 mm, and the mean pupal weight was 1.493 g (Table 4). Females and males showed significant differences in adult size (t = 3.079, P = 0.004) but not in pupal weight (t = 0.110, P = 0.913). No significant differences in performance were observed among the immatures that reached the adult stage from the egg stage between the 2 host plant species (development time: t = 0.416, P = 0.679; female adult size: t = 0.734, P = 0.471; male adult size: t = 0.620, P = 0.539; pupal weight: t = 0.227, P = 0.821).

Discussion

This study confirmed that B. polydamas can successfully use A. sessilifolia as host plant in the Uruguayan savanna ecoregion, even though higher mortality rates are produced when compared with the wellknown and broadly abundant host plant A. triangularis. As far as we know, no other study has previously described this interaction, despite the abundant records of other Aristolochia spp. used by B. polydamas throughout the Neotropics. Battus polydamas is by far the Papilionidae species with the largest number of known host plant species in the Neotropical Region (Beccaloni et al. 2008), which reflects its great ecological plasticity and its high tolerance of environmental constraints. Organisms with such plasticity are considered to have broad-range geographical distributions mainly due to their ability to explore different biotopes. In the case of herbivorous insects with holometabolous development, such a capacity could have evolved with the ability to accept novel plants as hosts (Thomas et al. 2001). However, the reason why only a limited number of Papilionoidea species have the ability to complete their immature development by using many different plants species as food sources remains unclear.

Table 3.

Mortality and survivorship levels of Battus polydamas immatures at different developmental stages and larval instars while using Aristolochia sessilifolia (N = 55) and Aristolochia triangularis (N = 59) as host plants under controlled laboratory conditions (25 ± 2 °C, 16:8 h L:D).

t03_762.gif

According to the SDMs generated, B. polydamas could be found virtually in all ecoregions of the Neotropical zone, from the dry fields of the Chaco to the moist forests of the Amazon basin, whereas A. sessilifolia seems to be restricted to southern South American grasslands from the Uruguayan savanna, Humid Pampa, Espinal, Southern Cone Mesopotamian savanna, and Humid Chaco. Because the Neotropics encompass a broad range of variable environments, it is expected that B. polydamas populations from different ecoregions would have evolved local adaptations to use the Aristolochia species present nearby as host plants, or have, at least, developed the ability to deal with more phylogenetically related host plants in certain regions. To the present, there are no conclusive studies describing local host plant adaptations in any Troidini species. Nonetheless, as the SDMs obtained for A. sessilifolia indicate a completely overlapped distribution with B. polydamas, and considering the ecological plasticity of this butterfly species, the results corroborate the theoretical prediction that A. sessilifolia could be a suitable host plant to B. polydamas in the Uruguayan savanna areas where no better host plant species is available.

Regarding the interaction between the Troidini and the genus Aristolochia, derived Troidini species generally use fewer species of Aristolochia as host plants when compared with basal species in the phylogeny of the tribe (Silva-Brandão et al. 2005). Monophagous behavior is very rare among the Troidini, as most larvae can be induced to feed on more than one Aristolochia species, despite the preference and best performance of larvae being linked to some specific plants (see discussion in Tyler et al. 1994). Thus, the ecological specialization may simply reflect the geographical distribution of the butterfly species, instead of showing a trend in the direction of specialization in host plant use. If the species has considerable ecological plasticity, it is expected that oviposition may take place on the host plants more plentifully available in a specific area. Therefore, the use of suboptimal or less preferred host plants could be related to the lack of better resources at a specific place and time (Fox & Morrow 1981; Bernays & Graham 1988).

Table 4.

Life-history characteristics (± SB) of Battus polydamas that completed the whole life cycle when fed ad libitum with cuttings of Aristolochia sessilifolia (N = 27) and Aristolochia triangularis (N = 38). Rearing was done in a laboratory environment controlled at 25 ± 2 °C and 16:8 h L:D.

t04_762.gif

Especially for the Uruguayan savanna areas where forest Aristolochia spp. (e.g., A. triangularis) are restricted to riparian and hillside forests, the use of A. sessilifolia, an open-field plant with prostrate habit, may assure food sources for the development of immatures. As B. polydamas is considered a generalist species, with high ecological plasticity, the strategy of using A. sessilifolia could result in lower competition with other Troidini species. According to Tyler et al. (1994), the number of Troidini species with a predicted distribution in the Uruguayan savanna areas scores 10 taxa, with only 3 of them exhibiting open-field habits, namely Euryades corethrus (Boisduval, 1836), Euryades duponchelii (Lucas, 1839) and B. polydamas. The former 2 species are singleegg oviposition butterflies that use just a few open-field Aristolochia species as host plants, whereas B. polydamas lays eggs in clusters of 3 to 7 units and exploits more than 20 Aristolochia species (Beccaloni et al. 2008). Interestingly, the 2 Euryades species occur mainly in habitats in the biogeographical provinces of the Chaco and the Pampa (sensu Morrone 2006), which are characterized by very harsh environmental conditions, especially during summer, with very scarce food sources for both immature and adult forms. The existence under such severe circumstances would only be possible if some adaptations to the local climatic conditions had evolved, or in other words, if specialization had arisen in the resident populations subjected to the environmental constraints. Battus polydamas does not seem to have been the target of such selective forces. Its widespread distribution in all biogeographical subregions of the Neotropics suggests that, instead of specializing for a set of specific environment constraints, it evolved towards maintaining minimum developmental and adult physiological requirements under unfavorable environmental conditions. Despite the fact that just a few Aristolochia species had been tested under controlled conditions for the suitability as host plant, there is plenty of empirical and field evidence supporting the assertion that B. polydamas has the ability to successfully use all Aristolochia species present in the Neotropics. Based on the presently available evidence, there is no doubt that B. polydamas stands as the most plastic Troidini species in the Neotropics.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to LRF Verane for laboratory assistance with B. polydamas rearing, to all land owners for providing access to areas where field surveys were performed, to the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio) for the collection license (#35179-3), and to the National System of Biodiversity Research/National Network for Research and Conservation of Lepidoptera (SiSBiota/RedeLep) for funding field surveys (grant #563332/2010). NOM was funded by CAPES National Postdoctoral Program (PNPD/CAPES) (grant #23038.8306/2010-62), VWS and GWGA by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), ABBM by SiSBiota/RedeLep, and HPR by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). This is contribution #574 of the Department of Zoology from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

References Cited

1.

F Barros , AAM. Araújo 2013. Aristolochiaceae. In Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do RJ.  http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB15749 (last accessed 20 Sep 2013). Google Scholar

2.

NH. Batjes 2000. Global Data Set of Derived Soil Properties, 0.5-Degree Grid (ISRIC-WISE). [Global Data Set of Derived Soil Properties, 0.5-Degree Grid (International Soil Reference and Information Centre -World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials)]. Data set. Available online [ http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/546. Google Scholar

3.

GW Beccaloni , AL Viloria , SK Hall , GS. Robinson 2008. Catalogue of the Host Plants of the Neotropical Butterflies/ Catálogo de las Plantas Huésped de las Mariposas Neotropicales. m3m-Monografías TercerMilenio, Vol. 8. Zaragoza, Spain: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA)/Red Iberoamericana de Biogeografía y Entomología Sistemática (RIBES)/Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (CYTED)/Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom. (NHM)/lnstituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Venezuela (IVIC). 536 pp. Google Scholar

4.

EA Bernays , RF. Chapman 1994. Host Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA. 312 pp. Google Scholar

5.

EA Bernays , M. Graham 1988. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69(4): 886–892. Google Scholar

6.

KS Brown , JR Trigo , RB Franchi , ABB Morais , PC. Motta 1991. Aposematic insects on toxic host plants: coevolution, colonization, and chemical emancipation, pp. 375–402 In PW Price , TM Lewinsohn , GW Fernandes , WW Benson [eds], Plant—Animal Interactions—Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA. Google Scholar

7.

JR. Busby 1991. BIOCLIM: A bioclimate analysis and prediction system, pp. 64–68 In CR Margules , MP Austin [eds.], Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis. CSIRO, Australia. Google Scholar

8.

FS. Chew 1977. Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential food plants. Evolution 31(3): 568–579. Google Scholar

9.

C Cortes , V. Vápnik 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 20(3): 273–297. Google Scholar

10.

RLH Dennis , B Donato , TH Sparks , E. Pollard 2000. Ecological correlates of island incidence and geographical range among British butterflies. Biodiversity and Conservation 9(3): 343–359. Google Scholar

11.

RLH Dennis , TG Shreeve , HR Arnold , DB. Roy 2005. Does diet breadth control herbivorous insect range size? Life history and resource outlets for specialist butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 9(3): 187–200. Google Scholar

12.

KA Dunne , CJ. Willmott 2000. Global Distribution of Plant-Extractable Water Capacity of Soil (Dunne). Data set. Available online [ http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/545. Google Scholar

13.

PR Ehrlich , PH. Raven 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18(4): 586–608. Google Scholar

14.

G Fagua , N Ruiz , F González , MG. Andrade-C 1998. Calidad del hospedero en el ciclo de desarrollo de Battus polydamas (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae: Troidini). Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 24(3): 131–140. Google Scholar

15.

O Farber , R. Kadmon 2003. Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modelling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance. Ecological Modelling 160(1–2): 115–130. Google Scholar

16.

G Fischer , F Nachtergaele , S Prieler , HT Van Velthuizen , L Vereist , D. Wiberg 2008. Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008). NASA, Laxenburg, Austria, and FAO, Rome, Italy. Google Scholar

17.

JA. Fordyce 2010. Host shifts and evolutionary radiations of butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277(1701): 3735–3743. Google Scholar

18.

LR Fox , PA. Morrow 1981. Specialization — species property or local phenomenon. Science 211(4485): 887–893. Google Scholar

19.

DJ Futuyma , MC. Keese 1992. Evolution and coevolution of plants and phytophagous arthropods, pp. 439–475 In GR Rosenthal , MR Berenbaum [eds.], Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites, 2nd ed Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. Google Scholar

20.

KJ Gaston , TM Blackburn , JH. Lawton 1997. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology 66(4): 579–601. Google Scholar

21.

Global Soil Data Task Group. 2000. Global Gridded Surfaces of Selected Soil Characteristics (IGBP-DIS). [Global Gridded Surfaces of Selected Soil Characteristics (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme - Data and Information System)]. Data set. Available online [ http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/569. Google Scholar

22.

NJ Gotelli , AM. Ellison 2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. 492 pp. Google Scholar

23.

RJ Hijmans , SE Cameron , JL Parra , PG Jones , A. Jarvis 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25(15): 1965–1978. Google Scholar

24.

FC. Hoehne 1942. Flora Brasilica: Volume XV, II Aristolochiaceas. Secretaria da Agricultura, Indústria e Comércio, São Paulo, Brazil. 141pp. Google Scholar

25.

N. Janz 2011. Ehrlich and Raven revisited: mechanisms underlying co-diversification of plants and enemies. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 42(1): 71–89. Google Scholar

26.

P Legendre , ED. Gallagher 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129(2): 271–280. Google Scholar

27.

R. Levins 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Monographs in Population Biology, Vol. 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

28.

C Loader , H. Damman 1991. Nitrogen content of food plants and vulnerability of Pieris rapae to natural enemies. Ecology 72(5): 1586–1590. Google Scholar

29.

ABB Morais , KS Brown , MA Stanton , KF Massuda , JR. Trigo 2013. Are aristolochic acids responsible for the chemical defence of aposematic larvae of Battus polydamas (L.) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)? Neotropical Entomology 42(6): 558–564. Google Scholar

30.

JJ. Morrone 2006. Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands based on panbiogeographic and cladistics analyses of the entomofauna. Annual Review of Entomology 51(1): 467–494. Google Scholar

31.

MES Muñoz , R Giovanni , MF Siqueira , T Sutton , P Brewer , RS Pereira , DAL Canhos , VP. Canhos 2009. openModeller; a generic approach to species' potential distribution modelling. Geolnformatica. DOI: 10.1007/s10707-009-0090-7. Google Scholar

32.

R Nishida , H. Fukami 1989. Ecological adaptation of an Aristolochiaceae feeding swallowtail butterfly, Atrophaneura alcinous, to aristolochic acids. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15(11): 2549–2563. Google Scholar

33.

DM Olson , E Dinerstein , ED Wikramanayake , ND Burgess , GVN Powell , EC Underwood , JA D'Amico , I Itoua , HE Strand , JC Morrison , CJ Loucks , TF Allnutt , TH Ricketts , Y Kura , JF Lamoreux , WW Wettengel , P Hedao , KR. Kassem 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51(11): 933–938. Google Scholar

34.

SEW Opitz , C. Müller 2009. Plant chemistry and insect sequestration. Chemoecology 19(3): 117–154. Google Scholar

35.

SJ Phillips , RP Anderson , RE. Schapire 2006. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190(3–4): 231–259. Google Scholar

36.

TW. Schoener 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49(4): 704–726. Google Scholar

37.

JM Scriber , F. Slansky 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 26(1): 183–211. Google Scholar

38.

KL Silva-Brandão , VN. Solferini 2007. Use of host plants by Troidini butterflies (Papilionidae, Papilioninae): constraints on host shift. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90(2): 247–261. Google Scholar

39.

KL Silva-Brandão , AVL Freitas , AVZ Brower , VN. Solferini 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of the New World Troidini swallowtails (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) based on COI, COII, and EF-1 alpha genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36(3): 468–483. Google Scholar

40.

TRE. Southwood 1961. The number of species of insect associated with various trees. Journal of Animal Ecology 30(1): 1–8. Google Scholar

41.

DRB Stockwell , IR. Noble 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data — a robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 33(5–6): 385–390. Google Scholar

42.

CD Thomas , EJ Bodsworth , RJ Wilson , AD Simmons , ZG Davies , M Musche , L. Conradt 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411(6837): 577–581. Google Scholar

43.

HA Tyler , KS Brown , KH. Wilson 1994. Swallowtail Butterflies of the Americas: A Study in Biological Dynamics, Ecological Diversity, Biosystematics, and Conservation. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 376 pp. Google Scholar

44.

DL Warren , SN. Seifert 2011. Ecological niche modelling in MaxEnt: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 21(2): 335–342. Google Scholar

45.

DL Warren , RE Glor , M. Turelli 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62(11): 2868–2883. Google Scholar

46.

DL Warren , RE Glor , M. Turelli 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33(3): 607–611. Google Scholar

47.

RW Webb , CE Rosenzweig , ER. Levine 2000. Global Soil Texture and Derived Water-Holding Capacities (WEBB et al.). Data set. Available online [ http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/548. Google Scholar
Nicolás Oliveira Mega, Vanessa Willems Scalco, Guilherme Wagner Gutierrez Atencio, Ana Beatriz Barros De Morais, and Helena Piccoli Romanowski "Battus polydamas (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) Uses the Open-Field Aristolochia sessilifolia (Piperales: Aristolochiaceae) as Its Host Plant in Uruguayan Savanna Areas," Florida Entomologist 98(2), 762-769, (1 June 2015). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0255
Published: 1 June 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top