Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2015 New Species Diversity Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Characterization of Gall-Inducing Calophya spp. (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) from Brazilian Peppertree
Rodrigo Diaz, Aaron M. Dickey, Robert G. Shatters, Veronica Manrique, Marcelo D. Vitorino, William A. Overholt
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Four populations of Calophya spp. (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) collected in Brazil were characterized using molecular and morphological methods. Examination of adults revealed the presence of 2 morphotypes, which were identified as C. latiforceps and C. terebinthifolii. However, morphological examination of 5th instar nymphs detected differences within C. latiforceps, with a population from Ubu, Espírito Santo, being distinct from the other 2 populations. Molecular characterization of the mitochondrial CO1 gene supported the presence of a new species of Calophya.

Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi; Sapindales: Anacardlaceae), native to South America, is considered one of the worst upland invasive species in Florida (Schmitz et al. 1997). Rodgers et al. (2012) estimated that approx. 283,000 ha in Florida have been invaded by this weed. Its aggressive growth, in addition to allelopathic properties, results in displacement of native vegetation and changes in plant community structure (Morton 1978; Morgan & Overholt 2005). Two genetic lineages of Brazilian peppertree invaded Florida (haplotypes A and B) and extensively hybridized since their arrival (Williams et al. 2005, 2007). In the USA, Brazilian peppertree also is present in Texas, Alabama, California, Georgia, and Hawaii (EDDMapS 2014). Mechanical methods and herbicide applications are used for controlling Brazilian peppertree (Gioeli & Langeland 1997; Langeland 2001). However, these methods are unsuitable for some natural areas due to the potential for collateral damage to native species (Doren & Jones 1997), and costly maintenance programs are required to prevent regrowth (Koepp 1978). There is general agreement among public and private land managers that an ecologically-based IPM plan is needed to provide an environmentally sustainable, cost-effective, and permanent solution to Florida's Brazilian peppertree problem (Cuda et al. 2006).

Gall-inducing psyllids in the genus Calophya (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) are specialist herbivores, several of which are associated with trees in the genus Schinus in South America (Burckhardt & Basset 2000). In Brazil, Calophya terebinthifolii Burckhardt & Basset and C. latiforceps Burckhardt induce open-pit galls on the leaves of Brazilian peppertree in the states of Santa Catarina and Bahia (Burckhardt & Basset 2000; Burckhardt et al. 2011), respectively. Adults lay eggs on margins and veins of new leaves, and after 7 to 9 d, crawlers hatch and initiate gall induction on the adaxial side of the leaves. Developmental time of C. terebinthifolii and C. latiforceps from egg to adult emergence is approximately 40 d (Christ et al. 2013; Diaz et al. 2014). Damage by C. latiforceps nymphs is characterized by yellowing, deformation, and abscission of leaves (Diaz et al. 2014). The psyllid damages plants by reducing leaf performance and thereby affecting plant growth. In laboratory trials, psyllid attack decreased photosynthesis by 59%, chlorophyll content by 10%, leaf area by 30%, and leaf biomass by 13% compared with uninfested trees (R. Diaz, unpublished data). Host specificity tests revealed that nymphs can develop only on Brazilian peppertree, and therefore Calophya spp. are considered promising potential biological control agents of Brazilian peppertree in Florida.

The large latitudinal range of the Calophyo—Brazilian peppertree association in Brazil (> 2000 km) stimulated questions about local adaptation to specific Brazilian peppertree genotypes (Cuda et al. 2012) and variation in cold tolerance. Between 2012 and 2014, we collected 50–100 individuals of Calophya spp. from trees in the states of Bahia, Espírito Santo, and Santa Catarina. The insects in Bahia were collected from haplotype B and K plants (Diaz et al. 2014). The trees from which Calophya spp. were collected in Espírito Santo and Santa Catarina were not genetically characterized but, based on the distributional information in Mukherjee et al. (2012), were likely haplotype A plants. The United States Department of Agriculture requires description of candidate weed biological control agents, which can include both morphological and molecular methods (USDA/APHIS/PPQ 2003). Therefore, the goal of this study was to characterize the Calophya populations maintained in the quarantine facility in Florida by using morphological and genetic methods. The Calophya populations examined originated from the following locations: a) Salvador: 12.908°S, 38.336°W, city of Salvador, Bahia State (Florida State Collection of Arthropods [FSCA] voucher E2013-3192-1); b) Camboriú: 26.921°S, 48.640°W city of Balneario Camboriú, Santa Catarina State (FSCA voucher E2014-5749-1); c) Carapina: 20.213°S, 40.229°W, city of Carapina, Espírito Santo State (FSCA voucher E2013-6744-1); and d) Ubu: 20.786°S, 40.579°W, city of Ubu, Espírito Santo State (FSCA voucher E2013-6743-1). Leaves containing 5th instars were placed in sturdy Ziploc® bags containing moist paper towels. Upon arrival at the quarantine facility, newly emerged adults were placed on Brazilian peppertree saplings and the 4 colonies were maintained separately. Insect collections and their export from Brazil were conducted under permit 12BR008156/DF from the Ministry of Environmental Resources of Brazil (Ministerio do Meio Ambiente). Importation into the United States was under USDA/APHIS/PPQ permit P526P-12-00304.

Based on morphology, adults from populations Ubu, Carapina, and Salvador were identified as C. latiforceps and adults from population Camboriú as C. terebinthifolii by Susan Halbert (Ubu, Carapina, and Salvador) and Daniel Burckhardt (Salvador). Adults were identified using descriptions from Burckhardt and Basset (2000) and Burckhardt et al. (2011), and reference vouchers from the Florida State Collection of Arthropods. Adults from populations Ubu, Carapina, and Salvador are yellow (Fig. 1A) and from Camboriú are yellow (abdomen) and black (head and thorax) (Fig. 1B). Examination of 5th instar nymphs revealed further differences. Individuals from the Ubu population had a continuous black band along the dorsal side of the head, thorax, and abdomen (Fig. 1C), whereas 5th instars of psyllid populations from Carapina and Salvador lacked dark markings (Fig. 1D). Fifth instars of the Camboriú population had 2 black bands on the dorsal side (Fig. 1E).

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from 10 individuals pooled from each population; C. terebinthifolii, C. latiforceps Salvador, Carapina, and Ubu. Degenerate cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene primers were designed from an alignment of psyllid mitochondrial sequence submissions downloaded from GenBank that corresponded to Pachypsylla venusta (Osten-Sacken), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, Cacopsylla pyri L. and Bactericera cockerelli (Suie). The P. venusta complete mitochondrial genome (GenBank Accession: AY278317.1) was used as a reference for this alignment. The alignment was done using Sequencher 5.1 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). Regions with low complexity were chosen to design degenerate PCR primers for the amplification of a phylogenetically useful fragment of the COI gene (one that matches sequences from many psyllid COI genes already in GenBank). The primer sequences and the base positions relative to the P. venusta whole mitochondrial genome accession are as follows: Psyllid-COI-F1, 5′-GCA/CGGAGGA/TGGAGACCA/TAT-3′, located at base positions 658-667; and Psyllid-COl-R1, 5′-AGGAAA/TTTCAGAA/GTAT/ACTATG-3′, located as base positions 1495–1515.

Fig. 1.

Adult male Calophya from Ubu, Carapina, and Salvador populations (A), adult male Calophya terebinthifolii (B), 5th instar from Ubu (C), Calophya latiforceps from Salvador and Carapina (D) and C. terebinthifolii (E).

f01_776.jpg

The designed primers were used in 20 µL PCR reactions conducted using 50 ng of total psyllid genomic DNA isolated from a batch of 10 psyllids of each collection using the Promega Wizard® SV Genomic DNA purification system (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The reaction was performed in a 20 µL final volume using 18 µL of Platinum PCR supermix (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA) with 1 µL of DNA template (50 ng total template DNA) and primer concentrations of 250 nM each. Gradient 3-step PCR was performed with annealing temperatures ranging from 40 to 60 °C using the following thermal cycling conditions: 94 °C 2 min.; (94 °C 30 sec; 40-60 °C 30 sec) × 35 cycles; 72 °C 10 min. Products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and a band corresponding to the size of the expected product (∼858 bp) was observed at annealing temperatures of 44 °C for the Salvador, Camboriú, and Carapina populations and 40 °C for the Ubu population. The excised fragment was purified using a NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey Nagel, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA). The purified fragment was cloned into pCR®2.1-TOPO using the TOPO®TA Cloning Kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA) and transformed into One Shot® DH5α TOP10 chemically competent cells (Life Technologies, Gand Island, New York, USA), and the cells were plated onto Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing kanamycin (50 µg/ mL) and X-gal (40 µL per plate of a 40 mg/mL stock) as describe in the manufacturer's protocol. Twenty-four white colonies from each of the 4 populations (96 colonies total) containing inserts were transferred to 1 mL of LB liquid medium (containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin) each in a well of a 96-deep-well plate, grown overnight with shaking at 37 °C, and the bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,300 × g for 5 min. DNA was isolated from the pellet using a QIAprep 96 Turbo Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) and provided for bidirectional Sanger sequencing to an in-house sequencing core facility. Sequences were analyzed for quality, vector and primer sequence trimming, and for alignment using Sequencher 5.1 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). Bidirectional sequence data was obtained from 93 of the 96 colonies with the 3 failures due to either lack of colony growth in the 96-well plate or failed sequence reaction.

Table 1.

Raw (below the diagonal) and model corrected (above the diagonal) pair-wise percent sequence divergences between Calophya populations.

t01_776.gif

Sequences were contiged, traces inspected, and base calls edited using Sequencher v. 4.8 software. From the 93 sequences analyzed, 33 unique 817 bp sequences were observed, 11 each from Ubu and Salvador, 6 from Carapina, and 5 from C. terebinthifolii. One sample from Carapina had a frame-shift causing single nucleotide deletion (816 bp, excluded from analyses and submitted as a pseudogene to GenBank). The remaining sequences encoded the expected COI protein sequence. The consensus sequence from each population plus the most divergent Ubu clone was used for phylogenetic inference. The best-fit model of sequence evolution was determined using the Bayesian Information Criterion in jModelTest (Posada et al. 2008), and phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MRBAYES 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) using 2 independent runs of 4 chains. Convergence of the posterior was assessed using the average standard deviation of split frequencies between runs (< 0.01), and samples prior to convergence were discarded as burn-in.

Monophyly of Ubu was well supported (100% of trees) and Ubu was > 6% divergent from Carapina + Salvador (Table 1). Mound et al. (2010) described a new species of Pseudophilothrips based on slight morphological differences and a 4.4% molecular divergence from a previously described species. Ubu has a strikingly different nymphal coloration although there were no distinguishing features in adults. The combination of divergent color pattern in nymphs and moderate molecular divergence at the COI gene is consistent with the conclusion that Ubu represents a new species, closely related to but distinct from C. latiforceps (Fig. 2). To confirm Ubu's specific status, future studies will evaluate whether crossings with C. latiforceps produce viable offspring. Finally, C. terebinthifolii was 13–14% divergent from the other 3 populations, which is consistent with the 13.2–13.5% divergence reported by Burckhardt et al. (2011) between C. latiforceps and C. terebinthifolii. DNA sequences have been deposited in GenBank (Accessions KM234280–KM234312).

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree of Calophya spp. collected In Brazil.

f02_776.jpg

We thank Drs. Susan Halbert from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and Daniel Burckhardt from the Naturhistorisches Museum, Switzerland, for insect identifications. This project was supported in part by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

References Cited

1.

D Burckhardt , Y. Basset 2000. The jumping plant-lice (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) associated with Schinus (Anacardiaceae): systematics, biogeography and host plant relationships. Journal of Natural History 34: 57–155. Google Scholar

2.

D Burckhardt , J Cuda , V Manrique , R Diaz , W Overholt , D Williams , L Christ , M. Vitorino 2011. Calophya latiforceps, a new species of jumping plant lice (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) associated with Schinus terebinthifolius (Anacardiaceae) in Brazil. Florida Entomologist 94: 489–499. Google Scholar

3.

LR Christ , JP Cuda , WA Overholt , MD Vitorino , A. Mukherjee 2013. Biology, host preferences, and potential distribution of Calophya terebinthifolii (Hemiptera: Calophyidae), a candidate for biological control of Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolius, in Florida. Florida Entomologist 96: 137–147. Google Scholar

4.

JP Cuda , AP Ferriter , V Manrique , JC Medal 2006 [eds.]. Florida's Brazilian Peppertree Management Plan. Recommendations from the Brazilian Peppertree Task Force, Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, 2nd edition. Florida, USA.  http://www.fleppc.org/Manage_Plans/2006BPmanagePlan5.pdf (last accessed 3 Aug 2014). Google Scholar

5.

JP Cuda , LR Christ , V Manrique , WA Overholt , GS Wheeler , DA. Williams 2012. Role of molecular genetics in identifying ‘fine tuned’ natural enemies of the invasive Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolius: a review. BioControl 57: 227–232. Google Scholar

6.

R Diaz , D Moscoso , V Manrique , D Williams , WA. Overholt 2014. Native range density, host utilization and life history of Calophya latiforceps (Hemiptera: Calophyidae): an herbivore of Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolia). Biocontrol Science and Technology 24: 536–553. Google Scholar

7.

RF Doren , DT. Jones 1997. Management in Everglades National Park, pp. 275–286. In D Simberloff , DC Schmitz , and TC Brown [eds.], Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Google Scholar

8.

EDDMapS. 2014. Early detection and distribution mapping system. The University of Georgia,  http://eddmaps.org/ (last accessed 19 Aug 2014). Google Scholar

9.

K Gioeli , K. Langeland 1997. Brazilian peppertree control. University of Florida, Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, SS-AGR-17. Florida, USA. Google Scholar

10.

WP. Koepp 1978. The status of Schinus manipulation, Everglades National Park, pp. 45–47 In Proceedings of techniques for control of Schinus in South Florida, The Sanibel Captiva Conservation Foundation, Inc., Sanibel, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

11.

KA. Langeland 2001. Natural Area Weed Management: A Training Manual for Restricted Use Pesticide Applicators. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

12.

EC Morgan , WA. Overholt 2005. Potential allelopathic effects of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi, Anacardiaceae) aqueous extract on germination and growth of selected Florida native plants. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 132: 11–15. Google Scholar

13.

JF. Morton 1978. Brazilian pepper — its impact on people, animals and the environment. Economic Botany 32: 353–359. Google Scholar

14.

L Mound , G Wheeler , D. Williams 2010. Resolving cryptic species with morphology and DNA: thrips as a potential biocontrol agent of Brazilian peppertree, with a new species and overview of Pseudophilothrips (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa 2432: 59–68. Google Scholar

15.

A Mukherjee , DA Williams , GS Wheeler , JP Cuda , S Pal , WA. Overholt 2012. Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida and South America: evidence of a possible niche shift driven by hybridization. Biological Invasions 14: 1415–1430. Google Scholar

16.

D. Posada 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. Google Scholar

17.

L Rodgers , M Boddle , D Black , F. Laroche 2012. South Florida environmental report - status of nonindigenous species (Vol. I). South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

18.

F Ronquist , M Teslenko , P Van Der Mark , DL Ayres , A. Darling 2012. Mr Bayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. Google Scholar

19.

DC Schmitz , D Simberloff , RH Hofstetter , W Haller , D. Sutton 1997. The ecological impact of nonindigenous plants In D Simberloff , DC Schmitz , and TC Brown [eds.], Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Google Scholar

20.

USDA/APHIS/PPQ. 2003. Reviewer's Manual for the Technical Advisory Group for Biological Control Agents of Weeds. Guidelines for Evaluating the Safety of Candidate Biological Control Agents. 02/2003-02.  http://www.phytosanitary.info/sites/phytosanitary.info/files/Reviewers_Manual_for_the_Technical_Advisory_Group_for_Biological_Control_Agents_of_weeds.pdf (last accessed 30 Mar 2015). Google Scholar

21.

DA Williams , WA Overholt , JP Cuda , CR. Hughes 2005. Chloroplast and microsatellite DNA diversities reveal the introduction history of Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida. Molecular Ecology 14: 3643–3656. Google Scholar

22.

DA Williams , E Muchugu , WA Overholt , JP. Cuda 2007. Colonization patterns of the invasive Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolius, in Florida. Heredity 98: 284–293. Google Scholar
Rodrigo Diaz, Aaron M. Dickey, Robert G. Shatters, Veronica Manrique, Marcelo D. Vitorino, and William A. Overholt "New Species Diversity Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Characterization of Gall-Inducing Calophya spp. (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) from Brazilian Peppertree," Florida Entomologist 98(2), 776-779, (1 June 2015). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0257
Published: 1 June 2015
KEYWORDS
análisis filogenética
Brazilian peppertree
control biológico de malezas
criador de agallas en las hojas
enemigos naturales
leaflet gall inducer
natural enemy
Back to Top