Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2015 Seasonal and Spatial Dispersal Patterns of Select Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Forest Habitats into Production Nurseries
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Exotic ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are important pests of ornamental tree nurseries. Although these beetles reportedly disperse in early spring from peripheral forested areas into nurseries, few studies have determined how far they fly to infest new host trees, or whether a masstrapping strategy can adequately protect a nursery crop. Field monitoring with ethanol baits in South Carolina (2011–2012), Mississippi (2013–2014), and Louisiana (2013–2014), USA, determined the timing of peak ambrosia beetle flights, dispersal distance, and optimal trap location. In addition to the well-documented spring flight peak, southeastern nursery managers may need to be aware of a second, late-summer flight. Captures from traps placed in a nursery at various distances (−25 to 200 m) from the forest—nursery interface showed a significant linear and quadratic trend in decreasing numbers of beetles captured with increasing distance from the forest in South Carolina, whereas significant linear, quadratic, and cubic trends were detected in Louisiana and Mississippi. Although captures at the nursery edge were lower than within the forest, traps placed at the nursery edge may still represent the optimal tool for both monitoring and mass-trapping programs because of easier access for personnel. Susceptible tree cultivars may gain added protection when placed deeper within nursery interiors and when baited traps line adjacent nursery edges.

Exotic ambrosia beetles, particularly Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky), Xylosandrus germanus (Blandford), Xylosandrus compactus (Eichhoff), and Cnestus mutilatus (Blandford) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), have been important tree pests in the southeastern United States at nurseries and in landscapes for decades. These species have gained prominence in recent years due to their wide host range, frequency of attacks, and difficulty of control (Mizell et al. 1994; Oliver & Mannion 2001; Fulcher et al. 2012). Foundress beetles tunnel into trees and inoculate their brood gallery with a symbiotic fungus, which is then consumed by adults and larvae (Biedermann & Taborsky 2011). These primary fungal symbionts, as well as secondary fungal pathogens, contribute to host plant mortality (Weber & McPherson 1984; Kuhnholz et al. 2001). Larval development of ambrosia beetles is completed within the gallery, and newly-eclosed, mated females disperse to new tree hosts (Weber & McPherson 1984). Although ambrosia beetles invading ornamental nurseries were presumed to originate from peripheral forested areas, few studies have fully investigated invasion source.

Standard management recommendations for ambrosia beetles include using ethanol lures to monitor adult flight in early spring, followed by applications of pyrethroid insecticides every 3 to 4 wk after the first beetle flights are detected (Hudson & Mizell 1999; Ranger et al. 2010, 2012; Reding et al. 2010, 2011). Prior studies describe an early spring population peak followed by a summer decline, and possibly a second, late summer peak for southern populations (Hudson & Mizell 1999; Oliver & Mannion 2001; Reding et al. 2010; Werle et al. 2012).

In natural environments, the directed flight of ambrosia beetles occurs within forests where wind speed is relatively low, particularly close to the ground where most beetle flight occurs (Browne 1961; Reding et al. 2011). However, within large open nurseries, where fewer windbreaks exist, higher wind speeds make directed flight significantly more difficult for small beetles (Pasek 1988). In a mark—recapture study, the striped ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), which is a coniferous forest tree pest in the western United States, only exhibited non-directed flight for distances of 100 m or more, whereas recaptures at 500 m were primarily downwind of the release point (Salom & McLean 1989). Mean dispersal distances of marked lesser grain borers, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), were significantly longer in wooded sites as compared with open sites (Mahroof et al. 2010). Similarly, T. lineatum was recaptured in significantly higher numbers from baited traps in forested as opposed to open settings, likely due to wind speeds roughly 4 times higher in the open settings (Salom & McLean 1991). Further knowledge of ambrosia beetle dispersal patterns may augment available cultural measures; for example, there may be a distance from the forest edge beyond which ambrosia beetles are unlikely to fly and attack trees. In large nurseries encompassing at least 50 hectares, we hypothesize that locating susceptible cultivars at the interior may provide added protection from ambrosia beetle attack.

Mass trapping is a technique that has been used successfully to suppress or even eradicate incipient populations of invasive insects at their advancing front (Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Even for established populations, mass trapping can offer cost-effective control when an attractant is perceived by a high proportion of the target insects and has a stronger pull than its ambient source (i.e., stressed trees), when traps collect insects throughout the dispersal period, and when traps, lures, and labor are cost effective (El-Sayed et al. 2006). Traps used in conventional ambrosia beetle monitoring programs meet all of these criteria; therefore, by capturing and killing a large proportion of dispersing females, mass trapping could be used as a population management tactic. In some cases, mass trapping can become a stand-alone control measure, but mass trapping also can be effective when combined with a delayed or reduced insecticide application (Huber et al. 1979). In a long-term study in commercial forests, mass trapping of several western ambrosia beetles (T. lineatum, Gnathotrichus sulcatus [LeConte], and Gnathotrichus retusus [LeConte]) yielded a benefit/cost estimate of five-to-one with associated savings of over US$500,000 (Lindgren & Fraser 1994). Trap position may play an important role in trapping efficacy, because traps placed 15 to 25 m inside the forest captured significantly more ambrosia beetles than did traps placed at the forest margin (Lindgren et al. 1983).

Because ambrosia beetle population monitoring is important for properly-timed insecticide applications, for choosing the best location within a nursery for tree crops, and for the development of a push—pull management strategy, study objectives included: 1) determining the source and timing of ambrosia beetle flights; 2) estimating dispersal distances into ornamental nurseries; and 3) identifying the best location for trap placement based on capture rate and convenience.

Materials and Methods

EXPERIMENTAL LOCATIONS

Four commercial nurseries were used as research sites, including Tangipahoa Parish (30°47'30.39"N, 90°20'37.91"W), Louisiana (LA); Stone County (30°47'59.92"N, 89°15'21.64"W), Mississippi (MS); Georgetown County (33°14'40.78"N, 79°22'52.80"W), South Carolina (SC); and Pickens County (34°45'50.34"N, 82°39'47.75"W), SC. All nurseries were large (> 60 ha) open landscapes with diverse arrays of containerized crops and greenhouses (Tangipahoa Parish, Stone County, and Georgetown County sites) and field-grown ornamental trees (Pickens County site). The LS site was surrounded by a combination of managed pine and natural mixed hardwood stands on 3 sides, with a road and residential area on the 4th. The pine stand at the LA site was subjected to a prescribed burn during our study in Feb 2014. The MS site was bordered by managed pine forest on 2 sides, a barren sand/ gravel pit on the 3rd side, and a road with residential areas on the 4th. The pine stand at the MS site last received a prescribed burn in 2011. The 2 SC sites were surrounded by pine—hardwood mix on all 4 sides and had not been burned within 5 yr of the experiment.

TRAPPING METHOD

Baker traps were constructed using 2 recycled soda bottles attached with a Tornado Tube (Steve Spangler Science, Englewood, Colorado, USA) (Oliver et al. 2004; Ranger et al. 2010; Reding et al. 2011). The upper 2 L bottle had 3 rectangular openings (length 15 cm, width 6 cm) in the sides to allow beetle entry, whereas the lower 592 mL bottle was partially filled with propylene glycol to kill and preserve insects. Traps were baited with a slow-release (65 mg/d at 25 °C) ethanol lures (AgBio, Westminster, Colorado, USA) and suspended about 1 m above the ground with Japanese beetle trap stands (Tanglefoot, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA) (LA and MS sites) or stands constructed of lumber and metal shelf support brackets (SC sites). The experimental design was randomized complete block. Treatments tested were traps placed at distances into the nursery from the edge of: −25, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m (LA and MS sites in 2013), or −13, 0, 13, 25, 50, and 100 m (SC sites in 2011 and 2012; LA and MS sites in 2014) (Fig. 1). Each treatment was a trap placed within its own row at a randomly assigned distance, with rows separated laterally from neighbors by 20 m (SC sites) or 25 m (LA and MS sites) to lessen the interference from adjacent treatments within the block. The number of blocks at each site was limited by nursery size and number of treatments tested. In 2013, each site held 5 blocks with 5 distance treatments in each for 25 traps in total, whereas in 2011, 2012, and 2014, there were 4 blocks with 6 treatments each for 24 traps in total. Research plots also were separated from the lateral and distal nursery edges by at least 200 m (LA and MS sites in 2013) or 100 m (SC sites in 2011 and 2012, LA and MS sites in 2014).

Traps were deployed in the spring with samples collected every 2 wk, and lures were replaced every 8 wk. Collections were made 1 Apr to 16 Dec 2011, 13 Jan to 28 Dec 2012, 22 Apr to 26 Aug 2013, and 21 Feb to 23 Oct 2014. The Scolytinae collected from individual traps were brought back to the laboratory for abundance and species determination using standard keys (Rabaglia et al. 2006).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Data from each collection year and site were analyzed separately because of variation in experimental design among the research sites and years. The effects of trap distance and collection time period were analyzed for the pooled numbers of C. mutilatus, X. compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus because these are the major pestiferous ambrosia beetle species in ornamental tree nurseries. Other ambrosia beetles captured were identified to species and counted but not used in the analyses. Mean captures of the 4 target species per trap per 2 wk sampling period were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), with distance and collection time period as factors (PROC MIXED, SAS Institute 2011). A first-order autoregressive covariance structure was included in the repeated measures statement. A trend analysis using polynomial contrasts was conducted to properly interpret significant distance effects. Because the distances were unequally spaced, a coefficient matrix for orthogonal contrasts was generated using PROC IML (SAS Institute 2011). The coefficient matrix was then used in contrast statements in PROC GLM to detect significant linear, quadratic, and cubic trends (SAS Institute 2011).

Fig. 1.

Satellite image of the Mississippi research site (Google, Mountain View, California, USA) with an overlay showing a randomized complete block design of 5 blocks. Representing the 2013 test, each block shown here had a trap placed at −25, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m from the nursery—forest interface.

f01_884.jpg

Results

Including all other non-target ambrosia beetle species, 2,345 and 1,961 specimens were collected from the Georgetown County (SC) and Pickens County (SC) sites, respectively, from 2011 to 2012, whereas 1,671 and 1,702 specimens were collected from the Tangipahoa Parish (LA) and Stone County (MS) sites, respectively, from 2013 to 2014. Ten, 11, 11, and 13 ambrosia beetle species were captured in ornamental tree nurseries located in Stone County, Tangipahoa Parish, Georgetown County, and Pickens County, respectively (Table 1). When pooled together, the 4 target species (C. mutilatus, X. compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus) composed 86.4% (Tangipahoa Parish, LA), 91.7% (Stone County, MS), 69.6% (Georgetown County, SC), and 63.7% (Pickens County, SC) of the total ambrosia beetles collected over 2 yr. Xylosandrus crassiusculus was consistently one of the most abundant species at all research sites. Similar to findings from other regional studies, X. germanus was not recovered from nurseries located in Stone County and Tangipahoa Parish, whereas C. mutilatus was not collected from the nursery located in Georgetown County, SC (Werle et al. 2012, 2014).

The numbers of ambrosia beetles captured biweekly were significantly different (P < 0.05) among distances from the nursery edges and sampling times at all nurseries and in all years (Table 2). The 2-way interactions between distances and sampling times also were significant for all nurseries and years (Table 2).

Ambrosia beetles of the 4 target species were active from Mar to Nov at all sampled nurseries (Figs. 2 and 3). Populations in LA and MS did not appear to begin flight activities earlier than the more northerly populations in SC. In the 1st years of this research in LA (2013), MS (2013), and SC (2011), the sampling efforts began too late to detect the initiation of spring flight. In the 2nd years, we detected the initiation of spring flight in late Feb (at LA and Georgetown County [SC] sites) to early Mar (at MS and Pickens County [SC] sites), which quickly developed into peaks in late Mar in SC (Fig. 2) and early Apr in LA and MS (Fig. 3). At nurseries in SC, the numbers of ambrosia beetles slowly declined with a 2nd peak in May–Jun (Fig. 2). Following a summer decline at nurseries in LA and MS, a 2nd surge in ambrosia beetle captures was detected beginning in late Jul 2013, and at the LA nursery in 2014 (Fig. 3), indicating the possible emergence of a 2nd generation.

Across sampling dates, trap distance from the nursery edge had a significant influence on the numbers of ambrosia beetles captured at all nurseries (Table 2). Trend analysis of the distance effect for ambrosia beetles showed significant linear and quadratic trends (P < 0.05) for nurseries located in SC (both years) and the nursery in MS (2014 only) (Table 3). The numbers of beetles captured were greatest at −13 m inside the forest, decreasing sharply at 0 and 13 m into the nursery (Fig. 4). The numbers declined further but at a slower rate or remained similar from 25 to 100 m in SC (Fig. 4) or 13 to 100 m in MS (2014; Fig. 5). The distance effect showed significant linear, quadratic, and cubic trends for the numbers of ambrosia beetles captured at nurseries in LA (2013 and 2014) and MS (2013 only) (Table 3). Similar to nurseries in SC, the greatest numbers of ambrosia beetles were captured at −13 or −25 m inside the forest at the sites in LA and MS (Fig. 5). However, at these sites, the numbers captured from 0 to 200 m fluctuated, with the numbers captured at greater distances occasionally higher than those at shorter distances (Fig. 5).

Table 1.

Species composition of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) captured in ethanol-baited Baker traps at ornamental tree nurseries in Louisiana (LA; 2013–2014), Mississippi (MS; 2013–2014), and South Carolina (SC; 2011–2012).

t01_884.gif

Table 2.

Statistics of repeated measure ANOVA for effects of distance from nursery edge and collection time period on the numbers of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X germanus captured per trap per 2 wk sampling period at ornamental tree nurseries in Louisiana (LA), Mississippi (MS), and South Carolina (SC).

t02_884.gif

Discussion

Ambrosia beetle trap capture peaks at nurseries in the southeastern United States were recorded from Mar through Apr, and again in SC from May to Jun and in LA and MS from late Jul through Aug. The timing of the 2nd peak flight in SC agrees with the observations of a May–Jun emergence of X. crassiusculus and May–Jul emergence of X. germanus in middle Tennessee (Oliver & Mannion 2001). Our documentation of this 2nd peak in ambrosia beetle activity should help southern nursery managers to more accurately monitor populations and alter management strategies accordingly. It may be best for nursery managers to operate a trapping program throughout the spring and summer months as verification of peak flight activity, and potentially as a mass-trapping strategy. Tree crops exposed to the abiotic stress of late summer heat can experience a variety of symptoms including inhibition of growth, reduction in ion flux, and production of reactive oxygen species (Wahid et al. 2007), which may increase vulnerability to attack by a 2nd generation of dispersing females.

Fig. 2.

Mean captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps at 2 sites in South Carolina in 2011 and 2012.

f02_884.jpg

Fig. 3.

Mean captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

f03_884.jpg

Table 3.

Results of trend analysis for effects of distance from nursery edge on the numbers of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus captured at ornamental tree nurseries in Louisiana (LA), Mississippi (MS), and South Carolina (SC).

t03_884.gif

Fig. 4.

Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. cra`ssiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery—forest interface at 2 sites in South Carolina in 2011 and 2012.

f04_884.jpg

Each nursery site had a unique ambrosia beetle community (Table 1), likely influenced by the surrounding natural plant communities that serve as hosts. Plant communities are in turn shaped by soil and landscape features and by micro-climactic conditions (Ohmann & Spies 1998). Although study site differences were likely due in part to natural habitat variability, there also were different forest and nursery management practices at the sites. With no recent prescribed burns at the MS and SC sites, fire-sensitive species including cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.; Rosales: Rosaceae), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.; Saxifragales: Altingiaceae), redbud (Cercis canadensis L.; Fabales: Fabaceae), and sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana L.; Magnoliales: Magnoliaceae), all known hosts of ambrosia beetles, were able to proliferate in adjacent forests (Mizell et al. 1994). However, at the LA site, a prescribed burn in Feb 2014 occurred before the start of our 2nd year of data collection. This prescribed burn destroyed much of the hardwood undergrowth at the LA site, and with it possibly many of the overwintering ambrosia beetles, contributing to a relatively low spring peak at this site (Fig. 4). Superficially, it may appear that properly timed prescribed fires, by lowering ambrosia beetle population size in surrounding forests, could reduce infestations within nurseries. However, due to greater tree stress, areas subjected to prescribed burns can experience an increase in populations of Xyleborina in subsequent years, and any nursery benefit gained from a fire-induced reduction in ambrosia beetle populations may be temporary (Sullivan et al. 2003; Campbell et al. 2008).

Nursery management practices also can be highly variable, contributing further to study site differences. In 2014, a large block of > 100 containerized redbud trees located between 13 and 50 m from the edge of the MS nursery was colonized by a pathogenic fungus (Fusarium lateritium Nees; Hypocreales: Nectriaceae), as well as a substantial ambrosia beetle population. After the trees were cut in Jun and brought back to the laboratory for examination, over 3.5 beetle galleries on average were observed per tree, and > 200 specimens of adult Xyleborina were collected. These trees contained a significant portion of the future reproductive capacity of the ambrosia beetles within that area, and when the trees were removed before a 2nd generation could emerge, trap capture data may have been impacted in terms of both trap distance and capture date variables (Figs. 2 and 4). Without the removal of these beetle-infested redbuds, it is possible we might have had experienced a more pronounced late summer peak at the MS site in 2014, as well as additional trap captures at or near the forest interface.

Fig. 5.

Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery—forest interface at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

f05_884.jpg

A linear and quadratic trend for trap captures could be observed with increasing distance from the nursery edge at nurseries in SC (2011 and 2012) and MS (2014) (Figs. 4 and 5). Although fewer beetles were captured by traps placed at the nursery edge (0 m) compared with traps within the forest (−13 and −25 m), edge placement was more convenient and easily accessible. When compared with all other traps within the nursery interior (13, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m), the traps at the nursery edge (0 m) did capture more beetles, supporting our hypothesis that the source of the ambrosia beetle population was within the peripheral forested areas as opposed to within the nursery. The effectiveness of the edge traps, combined with the benefit of avoiding daily operations within the nursery and the natural obstacles within the forest, would suggest that the optimal trap location would be at the nursery—forest interface.

The effects of weather patterns would certainly play a role in the beetles' detection of ethanol, as well as their ability to fly. A related curculionid species, Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier), was able to complete upwind oriented flights to baited traps at distances of up to 25 m, but beyond this distance the flights were largely downwind and undirected (Salom & McLean 1989). Similarly, study results support that with increasing distance into the nursery interior, and away from ambrosia beetle source populations, susceptible nursery stock may be subjected to less beetle pressure. The effect of prevailing winds may play an important role, as beetles attracted to volatile emissions may not detect stressed trees that are placed downwind, or conversely may find upwind flight more strenuous (Salom & McLean 1989; Ranger et al. 2015).

The use of a perimeter trapping program may augment the protection offered to nursery trees located at a greater distance from the nursery edge. Significantly more T. lineatum were captured in traps placed 100 m from the forest edge when intermediate traps at 5 or 25 m were not present (Salom & McLean 1989). Therefore, a ring of baited traps at the forest—nursery interface may protect tree crops, as the availability of more proximal perimeter traps would likely intercept dispersing females from longer-distance flights into the nursery interior. Although traps located as close to the forest as 13 m had significantly lower beetle captures than traps at the edge or within the forest, vulnerable nursery stock may not gain adequate protection from placement at 13 m. At nurseries deploying perimeter traps, placing susceptible cultivars at least 50 m from the nursery edge could help trees escape ambrosia beetle attacks, based on the low trap captures observed in this study at ³ 50 m.

Perimeter trapping can provide advance warning of ambrosia beetle activity and potentially divert large numbers of dispersing females from susceptible tree crops. When combined with cultural measures including maintaining tree vigor and locating vulnerable stock at nursery interiors, and a judicious spray program based on monitoring data from the traps, these cumulative efforts may lead to a highly effective, low-cost management program beneficial to nursery owners nationwide.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chris Ranger (ARS-HIRL, Wooster, Ohio), Peter Schultz (Hampton Roads AREC, Virginia Beach, Virginia), Jason Oliver and Karla Addesso (Tennessee State University, OFNRC, McMinnville, Tennessee), and Jeff Kuehny, Tim Schowalter, and Jeff Beasley (Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana) for advice on research methods. Also, thanks to Greenforest Nursery, Bracy's Nursery, Parsons Nursery, and King's Sunset Nursery for continuing cooperation and support of our research. This work was supported in part by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative, ARS Research Project 6062-21430-002-00D (National Program 305-Crop Production), and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture under project number SC-1700473.

References Cited

1.

PHW Biedermann , M Taborsky . 2011. Larval helpers and age polytheism in ambrosia beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108: 17064– 17069. Google Scholar

2.

EG Brockerhoff , AM Liebhold , B Richardson , DM Suckling . 2010. Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefits. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 40: S117–S135. Google Scholar

3.

FG Browne . 1961. The biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae. Malayan Forest Records 22: 1–255. Google Scholar

4.

JW Campbell , JL Hanula , KW Outcalt . 2008. Effects of prescribed fire and other plant community restoration treatments on tree mortality, bark beetles, and other saproxylic Coleoptera of longleaf pine, Pinus palustris Mill., on the Coastal Plain of Alabama. Forest Ecology Management 254: 134–144. Google Scholar

5.

AM El-Sayed , DM Suckling , CH Wearing , JA Byers . 2006. Potential of mass trapping for long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 1550–1564. Google Scholar

6.

A Fulcher , WE Klingeman , JH Chong , A LeBude , GR Armel , M Chappell , S Frank , F Hale , J Neal , S White , J Williams-Woodward , K Ivors , C Adkins , A Senesac , A Windham . 2012. Stakeholder vision of future direction and strategies for southeastern U.S. nursery pest research and extension programming. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 3: 1–8. Google Scholar

7.

RT Huber , L Moore , MP Hoffmann . 1979. Feasibility study of area-wide pheromone trapping of male pink bollworm moths in a cotton insect pest management program. Journal of Economic Entomology 72: 222–227. Google Scholar

8.

W Hudson , R Mizell . 1999. Management of Asian ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus crassiusculus, in nurseries. Proceedings of the Southern Nursery Association Research Conference 44: 198–201. Google Scholar

9.

S Kuhnholz , JH Borden , A Uzunovic . 2001. Secondary ambrosia beetles in apparently healthy trees: adaptations, potential causes and suggested research. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 6: 209–219. Google Scholar

10.

BS Lindgren , RG Fraser . 1994. Control of ambrosia beetle damage by mass trapping at a dryland log sorting area in British Columbia. The Forestry Chronicle 70: 159–163. Google Scholar

11.

BS Lindgren , JH Borden , L Chong , M Friskie , DB Orr . 1983. Factors influencing the efficiency of pheromone-baited traps for three species of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Entomologist 115: 303–313. Google Scholar

12.

RM Mahroof , PA Edde , B Robertson , JA Puckette , TW Phillips . 2010. Dispersal of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in different habitats. Environmental Entomology 39: 930–938. Google Scholar

13.

R Mizell , SK Braman , B Sparks , W Hudson . 1994. Outbreak of the Asian ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) is cause for concern. Proceedings of the Southern Nursery Association Research Conference 39: 191–193. Google Scholar

14.

JL Ohmann , TA Spies . 1998. Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecological Monographs 68: 151–182. Google Scholar

15.

JB Oliver , CM Mannion . 2001. Ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) species attacking chestnut and captured in ethanol-baited traps in middle Tennessee. Environmental Entomology 30: 909–918. Google Scholar

16.

JB Oliver , NN Youssef , MA Halcomb . 2004. Comparison of different trap types for collection of Asian ambrosia beetles. Proceedings of the Southern Nursery Association Research Conference 49: 158–163. Google Scholar

17.

JE Pasek . 1988. Influence of wind and windbreaks on local dispersal of insects. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22: 539–554. Google Scholar

18.

RJ Rabaglia , SA Dole , AI Cognato . 2006. Review of American Xyleborina (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) occurring north of Mexico, with an illustrated key. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99: 1034–1056. Google Scholar

19.

CM Ranger , ME Reding , AB Persad , DA Herms . 2010. Ability of stress-related volatiles to attract and induce attacks by Xylosandrus germanus and other ambrosia beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 12: 177–185. Google Scholar

20.

CM Ranger , ME Reding , PB Schultz , JB Oliver . 2012. Ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) response to volatile emissions associated with ethanolinjected Magnolia virginiana. Environmental Entomology 41: 636–647. Google Scholar

21.

CM Ranger , PC Tobin , ME Reding . 2015. Ubiquitous volatile compound facilitates efficient host location by a non-native ambrosia beetle. Biological Invasions 17: 675–686. Google Scholar

22.

ME Reding , JB Oliver , PB Schultz , CM Ranger . 2010. Monitoring flight activity of ambrosia beetles in ornamental nurseries with ethanol-baited traps; influence of trap height on captures. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 28: 85–90. Google Scholar

23.

ME Reding , PB Schultz , CM Ranger , JB Oliver . 2011. Optimizing ethanol-baited traps for monitoring damaging ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in ornamental nurseries. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 2017–2024. Google Scholar

24.

SM Salom , JA McLean . 1989. Influence of wind on the spring flight of Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a second-growth coniferous forest. Canadian Entomologist 121: 109–119. Google Scholar

25.

SM Salom , JA McLean . 1991. Environmental influences on dispersal of Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology 20: 565–576. Google Scholar

26.

SAS Institute. 2011. SAS User's Guide, Version 9.2. Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar

27.

BT Sullivan , CJ Fettig , WJ Ostrosina , MJ Dalusky , CW Berisford . 2003. Association between severity of prescribed burns and subsequent activity of coniferinfesting beetles in stands of longleaf pine. Forest Ecology and Management 185: 327–340. Google Scholar

28.

A Wahid , S Gelani , M Ashraf , MR Foolad . 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 199–223. Google Scholar

29.

BC Weber , JE McPherson . 1984. The ambrosia fungus of Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Entomologist 116: 281–283. Google Scholar

30.

CT Werle , BJ Sampson , JB Oliver . 2012. Diversity, abundance and seasonality of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in southern Mississippi. Midsouth Entomologist 5: 1–5. Google Scholar

31.

CT Werle , AM Bray , JB Oliver , EK Blythe , BJ Sampson . 2014. Ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) captures using colored traps in Southeast Tennessee and South Mississippi. Journal of Entomological Science 49: 373–382. Google Scholar
Christopher T. Werle, Juang-Horng Chong, Blair J. Sampson, Michael E. Reding, and John J. Adamczyk "Seasonal and Spatial Dispersal Patterns of Select Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Forest Habitats into Production Nurseries," Florida Entomologist 98(3), 884-891, (1 September 2015). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0311
Published: 1 September 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top