Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2016 Incidence of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Its Feeding Potential on Various Citrus (Sapindales: Rutaceae) Cultivars in the Sargodha Region of Pakistan
Muhammad Irfan Ullah, Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Afzal, Samina Khalid, Muqadas Saleem, Irfan Mustafa, Yasir Iftikhar, Jaime Molina-Ochoa, John E. Foster
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Spodoptera litura F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) adversely affects important crops such as cotton, okra, tomato, potato, and pumpkin. For the first time, this species was observed in a citrus nursery in the Sargodha Region of Pakistan. The principal objectives of this study were to determine the effects of several citrus (Sapindales: Rutaceae) cultivars, including Citrus reticulata Blanco (Feutrell's Early, Seedless Kinnow, and Fairchild mandarin orange) and Citrus paradisi Macfad. (grapefruit), on feeding by S. litura, and the effects of these plants on the growth of the insect. Based on performance of 3rd instars, Feutrell's Early and Seedless Kinnow supported maximum relative growth rates, high efficiencies of conversion of ingested food, and high levels of leaf consumption and larval weight gain, relative to the other citrus cultivars. Values of these parameters were lowest on grapefruit. Thus, the mandarin oranges Feutrell's Early and Seedless Kinnow were more susceptible to damage than grapefruit.

Citrus production is a significant component in the economy of Pakistan. Pakistan ranks 10th in the production of citrus in the world. Citrus crops cover an area of over 210,000 ha, with annual production of 2,237,000 tons (GOP 2013). The climatic conditions of Pakistan are appropriate for citrus cultivation (Syed 2007). Sargodha is the leading city for citrus production in Pakistan (Ashraf et al. 2014).

Unfortunately, citrus is threatened by a number of insect pests in Pakistan. The major pests of citrus in Pakistan include the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae); the fruit flies Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) and B. dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae); the citrus blackfly, Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae); the citrus leaf miner, Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae); and the giant mealybug Drosicha stebbingii (Stebbing) (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) (Mahmood et al. 2014).

Spodoptera litura F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) affects numerous crops including cotton, tomato, okra, potato, chili, cucumber, pumpkin, cabbage, pigeon pea, and gram. A wide host range is one potentially important evolutionary strategy to ensure survival (Lee et al. 2003). Generally, polyphagous insect pests like S. litura feed on multiple plant species and on various parts of these plants (Suomela 1996). Host se lection may be associated with the presence of secondary metabolites found in these plants, but they also display variation in nutritional value for the insects (Simpson et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2003).

Very few studies have evaluated the influence of various host plant species or cultivars on the growth and development of S. litura. The principal objective of this study was to assess feeding by S. litura on various citrus cultivars. Spodoptera litura is a potentially serious threat to citrus crops, inflicting not only immediate damage but also damage to the subsequent crop because defoliation effects often carry over into the next season.

Materials and Methods

INSECT CULTURE

Spodoptera litura was initially observed in a citrus nursery of the Department of Horticulture, University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan. Larvae of S. litura were collected from the mandarin orange cultivar Seedless Kinnow and brought to the Department of Entomology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan. The larvae were reared on artificial diet made of chickpea flour (Seth & Sharma 2002). The adults of S. litura were provided with a cotton boll saturated with 30% honey solution. The mature 3rd instars from the 1st laboratory-reared generation were used for further experiments.

CITRUS CULTIVARS

To evaluate the feeding potential of S. litura on various citrus (Sapindales: Rutaceae) cultivars, we selected the 3 cultivars Seedless Kinnow, Fairchild, and Feutrell's Early of Citrus reticulata Blanco (mandarin oranges) and 1 cultivar of Citrus paradisi Macfad. (grapefruit).

LEAF AREA CONSUMPTION

Third instars were individually placed in Petri dishes (9.0 ´ 1.5 cm). We used healthy, tender leaves, which were taken from the upper third of the plants. Leaves from the 4 host plants were collected daily and washed with distilled water. In each treatment, 5 leaves were placed in separate Petri dishes and 1 leaf of each cultivar served as a control (it was not offered to larvae). The experiment was replicated 3 times. The leaves were replaced after 2 d. The leaf area was measured with a leaf area meter (LI-COR model LI-3000, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). Consumption of leaves by S. litura larvae was determined by subtracting the remaining leaf area from the initial leaf area after correcting by using the value obtained in the control.

LEAF WEIGHT LOSS

We placed 3rd instar larvae on a weighed leaf within a plastic Petri dish to test larval feeding on the 4 citrus cultivars. The ends of the petioles were wrapped in moistened cotton to prevent desiccation. After 24 and 48 h, leaves were weighed and feces were removed from the leaves and weighed. Petri dishes were cleaned, and new weighed leaves were supplied. This process was continued every second day for each replication. Temperature and humidity were 25 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 5%, respectively, during the experiment. Daily food consumption per larva was estimated by subtracting the weight of the remaining leaf tissue from the weight of the initial leaf provided.

RELATIVE CONSUMPTION RATE (RCR)

The relative consumption rate (RCR) was measured by the following formula (Mehrkhou 2013):

e01_192.gif

Where I is the dry weight of food (mg) consumed, T is the duration of feeding period (d), and B is the insect dry weight gain (mg).

RELATIVE GROWTH RATE (RGR)

The relative growth rate (RGR) was calculated according to the following formula (Barrania 2013):

e02_192.gif

Where ΔB is the change in body weight of the insect (mg), BI is the initial larval weight, and T is the duration of the feeding period (d).

EFFICIENCY OF CONVERSION OF INGESTED FOOD (ECI)

The efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) was calculated according to the following formula (Suwarno et al. 2010):

e03_192.gif

Where B is the insect dry weight gain (mg) and I is the dry weight of food (mg) consumed.

DATA ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was conducted with a 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the statistical software Statistix 8.1. If significant differences were detected, then means were compared using Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test at α = 0.05.

Results

The results of the feeding and performance analyses of S. litura 3rd instars are provided in Table 1. Feeding and performance parameters differed significantly among citrus cultivars, except for RCR. The maximum consumption of leaf area was observed on the orange cultivars Feutrell's Early (9.23 cm2) and Seedless Kinnow (4.71 cm2). Leaf area consumption was significantly lower on the Fairchild cultivar and the grapefruit, 3.30 and 2.70 cm2, respectively (Fig. 1A). The maximum larval weight gain (larval biomass) was associated with Feutrell's Early (97.93 mg) and Seedless Kinnow (68.16 mg) cultivars, whereas the lowest weight gain was attained on grapefruit (7.02 mg) (Fig. 1E). The greatest production of feces was by larvae feeding on Feutrell's Early (22.80 mg) and Seedless Kinnow (15.84 mg) cultivars. The lowest value of feces production was by larvae feeding on grapefruit (2.60 mg) (Fig. 1F). The highest rate of relative growth (RGR) was observed on Seedless Kinnow (2.26 mg/mg/d), and the lowest was recorded on grapefruit (0.20 mg/mg/d) (Fig. 1B). In the case of relative consumption rate (RCR), the maximum value was observed on grapefruit (11.83 mg/mg/d) and the lowest was recorded on Seedless Kinnow (4.05 mg/ mg/d) (Fig. 1C). The efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) by larvae of S. litura was highest on Seedless Kinnow (130.75%) and on Feutrell's Early (99.26%). The minimum ECI value was observed on grapefruit (14.47%) (Fig. 1G).

Table 1.

Feeding and performance parameters of Spodoptera litura 3rd instars on 4 citrus cultivars as assessed by ANOVA.

t01_192.gif

Fig. 1.

Food consumption and performance of Spodoptera litura 3rd instars on 4 citrus cultivars: (A) leaf area consumption (cm2); (B) relative growth rate (RGR); (C) relative consumption rate (RCR); (D) leaf weight consumed (mg); (E) larval weight (mg); (F) weight of feces produced (mg); (G) efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI).

f01_192.jpg

Discussion

Efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) and relative growth rate (RGR) are the most important parameters related to feeding potential (Reese 1978). ECI and RGR measure the suitability of food, specifically the efficiency with which food is transformed into insect biomass (Waldbauer 1968), which assures the growth and development of insects (Nathan et al. 2005). In this study, significant differences were observed among the ECI and RGR values when S. litura was reared on various citrus cultivars. The highest values of ECI and RGR were related to feeding on Seedless Kinnow and Feutrell's Early cultivars of citrus, suggesting that the insects feeding on these hosts were most effective at the conversion of ingested food to biomass and larval growth. As can be seen in Fig. 1B and G, the maximum utilization of leaves was observed on Feutrell's Early and Seedless Kinnow orange.

This research showed that the Feutrell's Early and the Seedless Kinnow cultivars were fed upon more readily, and were more suitable for growth of S. litura, than the Fairchild orange and the grapefruit. Previous research also documented that larval development of S. litura varied greatly among various host plants (Zhu et al. 2000; Chen et al. 2002; Seema et al. 2004). As noted above, variation in consumption and growth might be due to either the variability of nutritional quality and quantity of the host plant or the presence of allelochemicals (Bernays & Chapman 1994).

Although S. litura damages numerous crops in the Sargodha Region of Pakistan, we believe this to be the first documented occurrence of this species affecting commercial citrus in a nursery. Although citrus proved to be susceptible to S. litura, we identified significant differences in susceptibility (amount of leaf consumption) and suitability (RGR and ECI) among 4 cultivars of citrus.

Acknowledgment

We are thankful to the biological control laboratory for providing us space and necessary support for the completion of this research.

References Cited

1.

Ashraf S , Khan GA , Ali S , Iftikhar M , Mehmood N. 2014. Managing insect pests and diseases of citrus: on farm analysis from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology 26: 301–307. Google Scholar

2.

Barrania AA. 2013. Antifeedant, growth inhibitory and toxicity effects of chlorantraniliprole, thiamethoxam and novaluron against the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in cotton fields. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 91: 903–911. Google Scholar

3.

Bernays EA , Chapman RF. 1994. Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York. Google Scholar

4.

Chen QJ , Yang JQ , Zhang JZ , Zhang YZ , Chen JH. 2002. Effect of temperature on laboratory population of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in tobacco fields. Tobacco Science and Technology 2: 42–45. Google Scholar

5.

GOP (Government of Pakistan). 2013. Pakistan Statistical Year Book. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Islamabad, Pakistan. Google Scholar

6.

Lee KP , Raubenheimer D , Behmer ST , Simpson SJ. 2003. A correlation between macronutrient balancing and insect host-plant range: evidence from the specialist caterpillar Spodoptera exempta (Walker). Journal of Insect Physiology 49: 1161–1171. Google Scholar

7.

Mahmood R , Rehman A , Ahmad M. 2014. Prospects of biological control of citrus insect pests in Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Research 52: 229–244. Google Scholar

8.

Mehrkhou F. 2013. Effect of soyabean varieties on nutritional indices of beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 1528–1533. Google Scholar

9.

Nathan SS , Chung PG , Murugan K. 2005. Effect of biopesticides applied separately or together on nutritional indices of the rice leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica 33: 187–195. Google Scholar

10.

Reese JC. 1978. Chronic effects of plant allelochemicals on insect nutritional physiology. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 24: 625–626. Google Scholar

11.

Seema R , Goel BB , Gupta GP. 2004. Effects of temperature on the development and reproduction of Spodoptera litura. Annals of Plant Protection Science 12: 205–206. Google Scholar

12.

Seth RK , Sharma VP. 2002. Growth, development, reproductive competence and adult behavior of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared on different diets, pp. 15–28 In Bloem S , Carpenter JE , Hendrichs J [eds.], Evaluation of Lepidoptera Population Suppression by Radiation Induced Sterility. IAEA-TECDOC-1283, April 2002. Vienna, Austria. Google Scholar

13.

Simpson SJ , Raubenheimer D , Behmer ST , Whitworth A , Wright GA. 2002. A comparison of nutritional regulation in solitarious and gregarious phase nymphs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 121–129. Google Scholar

14.

Suomela J. 1996. Within-tree variability of mountain birch leaves causes variation in performance for Epirrita autumnata larvae. Vegetation 127: 77–83. Google Scholar

15.

Suwarno , Salmah MRC , Ali A , Hassan AA. 2010. Oviposition preference and nutritional indices of Papilio polytes L. (Papilionidae) larvae on four rutaceous (Sapindales: Rutaceae) host plants. Journal of the Lepidopterists Society 64: 203–210. Google Scholar

16.

Syed R. 2007. Searching new avenues to enhance citrus fruit export. Daily Times Pakistan, May 5, 2007. Google Scholar

17.

Waldbauer GP. 1968. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 5: 229–288. Google Scholar

18.

Zhu SD , Lu ZQ , Chen LF , Yu W , Zhang SJ. 2000. Effect of temperature and food on Spodoptera litura population. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 111–114. Google Scholar
Muhammad Irfan Ullah, Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Afzal, Samina Khalid, Muqadas Saleem, Irfan Mustafa, Yasir Iftikhar, Jaime Molina-Ochoa, and John E. Foster "Incidence of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Its Feeding Potential on Various Citrus (Sapindales: Rutaceae) Cultivars in the Sargodha Region of Pakistan," Florida Entomologist 99(2), 192-195, (1 June 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0206
Published: 1 June 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top