Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2016 Geographic Distribution of Cephalotes varians (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Cephalotes varians (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) recently was included on a list of adventive ants established in North America. Published and unpublished records of C. varians from >100 sites reveal that it has an apparently continuous distribution through the Bahamas, Cuba, and southern Florida. Records of C. varians from South America, Central America, and Trinidad appear to be based on misidentifications, and there is therefore no justification for regarding C. varians as adventive in Florida.

Turtle ants, genus Cephalotes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), are a group of New World arboreal ants with heavily armored workers. When disturbed, workers typically tuck their antennae and legs beneath flanges on their head and body, crouch down, and freeze, thus passively resisting attacks.

Only 1 of the 119 described species of extant Cephalotes is known in the United States: Cephalotes varians (Smith) (Bolton 2016). Recently, Wittenborn & Jeschke (2011) included C. varians on their list of 93 exotic ant species established in North America. The present analysis was aimed primarily at documenting the range of C. varians and assessing where this species is native and where it may have arrived through human commerce.

Cephalotes varians is notable for having specialized major workers with large disc-shaped heads they use to plug the nest entrance holes and prevent enemies from gaining access to the nest. Several studies have examined behavior and ecology of C. varians in the Florida Keys (e.g., Wilson 1976; Cole 1980, 1983). Wilson (1976) wrote that C. varians “has been found nesting in dead branches of various trees, including Bauhinia, the sea grape Coccoloba, and (especially in the Florida Keys) the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle. Colonies have also been found in stems of tall grasses and sedges, including sea oat (Uniola paniculata) and saw grass (Cladium jamaicensis).” Mature colonies of C. varians have up to several hundred workers (Wilson 1976).

TAXONOMY

Smith (1876) described Cryptocerus varians (= C. varians) from Cuba. Kempf (1958) designated Cephalotes jamaicensis (Forel) a junior synonym of C. varians, but de Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999) revived C. jamaicensis from synonymy and raised it to a full species.

De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999) placed C. varians in the “pallens clade” with 9 other species: Cephalotes decolor de Andrade (of Colombia and Venezuela), Cephalotes decoloratus de Andrade (of the Dominican Republic and Haiti), Cephalotes jamaicensis (Forel) (of Jamaica), Cephalotes pallens (Klug) (widespread in the Caribbean region), Cephalotes pallidoides de Andrade (of South America, Trinidad, and Tobago), Cephalotes pallidus de Andrade (of South America), Cephalotes patellaris (Mayr) (of Brazil), Cephalotes pellans de Andrade (of South America), and Cephalotes porrasi (Wheeler) (of Central and South America). De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999) wrote: “The species we recognise as belonging to the pallens clade represent a very homogeneous set and are often difficult to distinguish from each other, particularly in the worker caste. This situation is worsened by the fact that these ants appear to exhibit the greatest variability within Cephalotes in sculpturation and in body size.”

Wheeler (1905) wrote that compared with C. pallens, “the petiole and postpetiole of the worker and the soldier of varians [. . .] are narrower and of a different shape, and the thorax of the soldier is not so broad behind.” De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999) wrote that diagnostic characters of C. varians included “in the worker propodeal sides unarmed or with a narrow membranaceous margin medially denticulate, in the soldier and in the gyne by the combination of head disc with foveae contiguous each other, in the soldier by the outer face of the hind femora superficially carinate, by the head longer than broad, and, in the gyne, by the petiole and postpetiole without or with reduced lateral expansions.” De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999) reported C. varians as the only member of the pallens clade known in the Bahamas, Cuba, or Florida, and all their records of this species came from these three areas.

Previous taxonomic revisions have classified C. varians and its closest relatives in the following genera: Cyathocephalus, Cryptocerus, Paracryptocerus, and Zacryptocerus (de Andrade & Baroni Urbani 1999).

Materials and Methods

I compiled collection location data taken from published records and unpublished records of museum specimens in the collections of the Archbold Biological Station (ABS), the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), and the Smithsonian Institution (USNM). In addition, I used online databases that host specimen collection information (Antweb;  www.antweb.org) and obtained geo-coordinates for collection sites from published references, specimen labels, maps, or geography web sites (e.g., earth.google.com and  www.tageo.com).

To refine the geographic range of C. varians, I collected ants nesting inside dead twigs of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.; Rhizophoraceae) at sites along the east coast of Florida (Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St Lucie, Indian River, Brevard, and Volusia counties) and on islands of the Bahamas (Grand Bahama, North Bimini, New Providence, and Half Moon Cay) and the Turks and Caicos Islands (Providenciales, North Caicos, Middle Caicos, and Grand Turk).

Fig. 1.

Geographic distribution of Cephalotes varians records.

f01_755.jpg

Results

I mapped published and unpublished specimen records of C. varians from >100 sites (Fig. 1). I documented the earliest known C. varians records for Bahamas, Cuba, Dominican Republic, and Florida (Table 1).

I collected C. varians nesting inside red mangrove twigs in Florida and in the Bahamas in the following Florida and Bahamas locations: FLORIDA: Miami-Dade County: Oleta River State Park (25.916°N, 80.128°W; 20 Feb 2016), No Name Harbor in Bill Baggs State Park (25.676°N, 80.161°W; 21 Feb 2016), and Homestead Bayfront Park (25.463°N, 80.346°W; 20 Feb 2016); BAHAMAS: Grand Bahama, North Riding Point (26.729°N, 78.161°W; 2 Jun 2015); North Bimini, marsh at north end of the main road (25.774°N, 79.263°W; 8 Jun 2015); Bimini Bay, northeastern Bimini Bay (25.774°N, 79.258°W; 9 Jun 2015), northern Bimini Bay (25.773°N, 79.261°W; 8 Jun 2015); and the east side of Bimini Bay (25.771°N, 79.257°W; 9 Jun 2015). I did not find C. varians nesting inside red mangrove in Florida north of Miami-Dade County or in the Turks and Caicos Islands.

Table 1.

Earliest known records for Cephalotes varians. MNHN = Museo Nacional de Historia Natural in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

t01_755.gif

David Lubertazzi (personal communication) recorded a specimen identified as C. varians in the Dominican Republic in the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural in Santo Domingo (Table 1), but it may be a misidentification of C. decoloratus, a species known only from Haiti and the Dominican Republic. In fact, one of the type specimens of C. decoloratus (Petionville: Hotel Montana; 1972-04-05) is currently listed on antweb.org as C. varians.

Excluded records

Kempf (1958) wrote: “Previously published records for the species [C. varians] from Honduras (Mann 1922), and in Trinidad, Venezuela and Colombia (Weber 1938, 1948), are obviously based on misidentification and have been referred to pallens.” De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999), however, identified Mann's (1922) specimens from Honduras as Cephalotes biguttatus (Emery).

Kempf (1958) wrote: “The species occurs in southern Florida, south of Miami, in the Bahamas (Andros, New Providence, Bimini), in Cuba and Jamaica.” De Andrade & Baroni Urbani (1999), however, considered all Jamaican records of C. varians as a separate species, C. jamaicensis.

In addition to the records of C. varians that Kempf (1958) dismissed as misidentifications (Mann 1922; Weber 1938, 1948), there are 3 records of C. varians from sites located far from any other confirmed records: Colombia (Fernández et al. 1996), Mexico (Abud 1987, in Vásquez-Bolaños & Navarrete-Heredia 2004), and Trinidad (Dutra & Wetterer 2007). Fernández & Sendoya (2004) and Vásquez-Bolaños (2014), however, do not list C. varians as occurring in Colombia or Mexico, evidently concluding that the earlier listings were misidentifications. Dutra & Wetterer (2007) recorded C. varians in Trinidad (identified by Roy Snelling) based on a specimen collected from inside an epiphytic orchid; however, upon re-examination, I found that this specimen does not match C. varians in several respects.

Discussion

Cephalotes varians records have an apparently continuous distribution through the Bahamas, Cuba, and southern Florida, and a single record in the Dominican Republic that needs confirmation. Cephalotes varians appears to be widespread across Cuba, Florida, and the Bahamas south of 26°N, and quite rare above this latitude; there are only 2 records of C. varians north of 26°N: Long Point Park, Brevard County, Florida (27.873°N, 80.469°W; 2000, ABS) and Grand Bahama (see results).

Wittenborn & Jeschke (2011) are the only authors who considered C. varians to be adventive in any part of its range, whereas other researchers consistently treat C. varians as native in Florida, the Bahamas, and Cuba (e.g., Deyrup et al. 1988; Deyrup 1994, 2003; Fontenla Rizo 1997; Fisher & Cover 2007; Moreau et al. 2014). Wittenborn & Jeschke (2011) appear to also have misclassified as adventive at least 10 other ant species that are actually native to North America (see Wetterer 2014, 2015a,b, 2016; Wetterer & Snelling 2015). Wittenborn & Jeschke (2011) aimed to compare characteristics of native versus exotic ant species in North America, but misclassification undermines the validity of their conclusions. Furthermore, if native species are erroneously considered to be exotic, these species may be treated as targets for eradication rather than valued and considered worthy of protection.

Acknowledgments

I thank M. Wetterer for comments on this manuscript; S. Cover (MCZ) and T. Schultz (USNM) for help with their respective ant collections; D. Lubertazzi for an unpublished record; D. P. Wojcik and S. D. Porter for compiling their valuable FORMIS bibliography; and Florida Atlantic University for financial support.

References Cited

1.

Bolton B. 2016. AntCat: an online catalog of the ants of the world,  www.antcat.org (last accessed 20 Jan 2016). Google Scholar

2.

Cole BJ. 1980. Repertoire convergence in two mangrove ants, Zacryptocerus varians and Camponotus (Colobopsis) sp. Insectes Sociaux 27: 265–275. Google Scholar

3.

Cole BJ. 1983. Assembly of mangrove ant communities: colonization abilities. Journal of Animal Ecology 52: 349–355. Google Scholar

4.

de Andrade ML, Baroni Urbani C. 1999. Diversity and adaptation in the ant genus Cephalotes, past and present. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie) 271: 1–889. Google Scholar

5.

Deyrup M. 1994. Biogeographical survey of the ants of the island of San Salvador, Bahamas, pp. 21–28 In Kass LB. [ed.] Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on the Natural History of the Bahamas, Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas. Google Scholar

6.

Deyrup M. 2003. An updated list of Florida ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist 86: 43–48. Google Scholar

7.

Deyrup MA, Carlin N, Trager J, Umphrey G. 1988. A review of the ants of the Florida Keys. Florida Entomologist 71: 165–166. Google Scholar

8.

Dutra D, Wetterer JK. 2007. Ants in myrmecophytic orchids of Trinidad (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51: 249–254. Google Scholar

9.

Emery C. 1895. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der nordamerikanischen Ameisenfauna. (Schluss). Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere 8: 257–360. Google Scholar

10.

Fernández F, Sendoya S. 2004. Synonymic list of Neotropical ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biota Colombiana 5: 3–105. Google Scholar

11.

Fernández F, Palacio EE, MacKay WP, MacKay ES. 1996. Introducción al estudio de las hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Colombia, pp. 349–412 In Andrade MG, Amat García G, Fernández F [eds.], Insectos de Colombia. Estudios escogidos. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

12.

Fisher BL, Cover SP. 2007. Ants of North America: A Guide to the Genera. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

13.

Fontenla Rizo JL. 1997. Lista preliminar de las hormigas de Cuba (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Cocuyo 6: 18–21. Google Scholar

14.

Kempf WW. 1958. Synonymic note on ants of the genus Paracryptocerus Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomological News 69: 108–110. Google Scholar

15.

Mann WM. 1922. Ants from Honduras and Guatemala. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 61: 1–54. Google Scholar

16.

Moreau CS, Deyrup MA, Davis Jr LR. 2014. Ants of the Florida Keys: species accounts, biogeography, and conservation (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Insect Science 14(295): https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu157. Google Scholar

17.

Smith F. 1876. Descriptions of new species of Cryptoceridae, belonging to the genera Cryptocerus, Meranoplus, and Cataulacus. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1876: 603–612. Google Scholar

18.

Vásquez Bolaños M. 2014. Lista de especies de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para México. Dugesiana 18: 95–133. Google Scholar

19.

Vásquez Bolaños M, Navarrete-Heredia JL. 2004. Checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Jalisco State, Mexico. Sociobiology 43: 351–365. Google Scholar

20.

Weber NA. 1938. The food of the giant toad, Bufo marinus (L.), in Trinidad and British Guiana with special reference to the ants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 31: 499–503. Google Scholar

21.

Weber NA. 1948. Studies on the fauna of Curaçao, Aruba, Bonaire and the Venezuelan islands: No. 14. Ants from the Leeward Group and some other Caribbean localities. Natuurwetenschappelijke Studiekring voor Suriname en de Nederlandse Antillen 5: 78–86. Google Scholar

22.

Wetterer JK. 2014. Geographic distribution of Gnamptogenys hartmani (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an “agro-predator” that attacks fungus-growing ants. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 7: 147–157. Google Scholar

23.

Wetterer JK. 2015a. Geographic distribution of Trachymyrmex jamaicensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist 98: 1175–1178. Google Scholar

24.

Wetterer JK. 2015b. Geographic distribution of Leptogenys elongata (Buckley) and Leptogenys manni Wheeler (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 46: 127–136. Google Scholar

25.

Wetterer JK. 2016. Geographic distribution of Pachycondyla harpax (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiology, in press. Google Scholar

26.

Wetterer JK, Snelling GC. 2015. Geographic distribution of Labidus coecus (Latr.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), a subterranean army ant. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 44: 31–38. Google Scholar

27.

Wheeler WM. 1905. The ants of the Bahamas, with a list of the known West Indian species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 21: 79–135. Google Scholar

28.

Wilson EO. 1976. A social ethogram of the Neotropical arboreal ant, Zacryptocerus varians (Fr. Smith). Animal Behavior 24: 354–363. Google Scholar

29.

Wittenborn D, Jeschke JM. 2011. Characteristics of exotic ants in North America. NeoBiota 10: 47–64 (in Appendix 1). Google Scholar
James K. Wetterer "Geographic Distribution of Cephalotes varians (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)," Florida Entomologist 99(4), 755-758, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0429
Published: 1 December 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top