BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
15 January 2013 Influence of stream–floodplain biogeochemical linkages on aquatic foodweb structure along a gradient of stream size in a tropical catchment
Jason B. Fellman, Neil E. Pettit, Jesse Kalic, Pauline F. Grierson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We measured nutrients and dissolved organic matter (DOM) in surface water and floodplain sediments to evaluate biogeochemical linkages between streams and floodplains in 3 streams of increasing size in a tropical catchment in northwestern Australia. We hypothesized that stream–floodplain biogeochemical connectivity, measured as similar DOM concentrations and spectroscopic properties of streamwater and floodplain sediment leachate, would decrease with increasing stream size. We expected decreasing connectivity to shift support of aquatic foodweb structure from mainly allochthonous C in small streams to algal C in larger streams. Streamwater and sediment leachate concentrations of NH4-N, NO3-N, soluble reactive P, and DOM varied several-fold across the 3 sites but showed no strong pattern in stream–floodplain connectivity with increasing stream size. Fluorescence index, specific ultraviolet absorbance, and δ13C-dissolved organic C (DOC) for stream water and sediment leachate were most similar to each other at the mid-size Adcock River, indicating tight river–floodplain biogeochemical connectivity via input of allochthonous DOM and NH4-N to stream water. δ13C and δ15N signatures for key producers and consumers for all 3 streams showed that invertebrate consumers probably were supported by a range of in-stream (e.g., benthic and filamentous algae) and floodplain (allochthonous leaf litter) sources, whereas fish strongly reflected δ13C-enriched sources (e.g., benthic algae). Allochthonous C was probably only a minor energy source for metazoa, but we propose that river–floodplain biogeochemical linkages may be important for other aspects of ecosystem productivity, such as input of inorganic nutrients to support in-stream primary production. Terrestrial–aquatic biogeochemical linkages may be critical but poorly quantified components of river–floodplain ecosystems.

The Society for Freshwater Science
Jason B. Fellman, Neil E. Pettit, Jesse Kalic, and Pauline F. Grierson "Influence of stream–floodplain biogeochemical linkages on aquatic foodweb structure along a gradient of stream size in a tropical catchment," Freshwater Science 32(1), 217-229, (15 January 2013). https://doi.org/10.1899/11-117.1
Received: 28 August 2011; Accepted: 1 November 2012; Published: 15 January 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
13 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
biogeochemical linkages
carbon
flood pulse
floodplain
food web structure
Kimberley
specific ultraviolet absorbance
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top