We examined the question of whether an apparently restricted diet qualifies the Florida sand skink (Plestiodon reynoldsi) as a dietary specialist. We gathered diet data from the three existing sources, added new data from individuals that we collected, and used these data to calculate measures of dietary diversity. We compared the diet of P. reynoldsi with those of 25 species of skinks, nine species of fossorial squamates, and six species of lizards and snakes found in habitats similar to those occupied by P. reynoldsi. We estimated diet choice indirectly and applied standards of specialization drawn from the literature. In every regard, the Florida sand skink did not seem to have a restricted diet. Dietary diversity values for the species are near the center of the distribution of values for skinks and for the species found in similar habitats. The species has a higher than expected H′ value, based on the identity of its main prey, and the highest or nearly highest dietary diversity values among the fossorial species examined. The diet of the species did not stabilize over the course of four diet studies; rather, the cumulative number of prey types taken nearly doubled. We suggest that the apparently restricted diet of P. reynoldsi reflects the restricted prey choices provided by its foraging sites. A major problem in studying dietary specialization is the lack of data on prey availability and therefore a lack of solid information on diet choice.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.
Vol. 66 • No. 4