Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2018 Trophic Ecology of Two Sympatric Frogs with Contrasting Morphology and Habitat Use in a Subtropical Wetland
Sônia Huckembeck, Kirk O. Winemiller, Daniel Loebmann, Alexandre M. Garcia
Author Affiliations +

Frog diets are influenced by multiple factors, including morphological constraints, habitat use, and seasonal variation in environmental conditions and food availability. This study combined stomach content analysis (SCA), stable isotope analysis (SIA), and estimates of prey availability to investigate the influence of body size and microhabitat use on seasonal variation of the trophic ecology of two sympatric hylids (Pseudis minuta and Scinax squalirostris). We evaluated two hypotheses: (1) the species with larger body and mouth sizes or broader use of microhabitats will have greater diet breadth, and (2) regardless of differences in morphological traits and microhabitat use, diet breadth of both species will be greater during the warmer of two periods. Pseudis minuta exhibited larger body size and mouth width and revealed broader use of microhabitats (mostly within and near major water bodies), whereas S. squalirostris had smaller body size and mouth gape and was found exclusively within or near phytotelmata (plant-held water bodies). SCA revealed that P. minuta had a more diverse diet than S. squalirostris. Only P. minuta showed temporal dietary differences, but these findings did not corroborate our prediction of greater diet diversity during the warmer and drier period when prey densities were higher. The two species had distinct carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios, indicating assimilation of different resources, except during the colder wetter season when their isotope spaces overlapped partially. We concluded that the two hylids did not use the same food resources on account of their differences in morphology and microhabitat use, and environmental seasonality did not influence their feeding strategies.

Given their diverse life histories, feeding strategies, and microhabitats, frogs are useful for studying trophic ecology in wetlands (Hocking and Babbitt 2014). Frogs play different ecological roles throughout their ontogeny, with aquatic tadpoles consuming benthic algae and detritus, with potential to have top-down effects on aquatic primary production (Ranvestel et al. 2004). Most adult frogs use both aquatic and terrestrial habitats and consume invertebrates, and therefore might influence the flow of matter and energy between aquatic and terrestrial compartments of wetland food webs (Huckembeck et al. 2014). Wetlands tend to have high productivity and rapid nutrient cycling that support essential ecosystems services and high biodiversity, including herpetofauna (Zedler 2000). At subtropical and tropical latitudes, wetlands are influenced by rainfall and, to a lesser degree, temperature (Simioni et al. 2017), which directly affect environmental conditions, productivity, and community dynamics. During periods of low rainfall, the area of water bodies and flooded zones is reduced and aquatic organism density increases, which might increase predator–prey encounter rates and foraging success of aquatic consumers (Maltchik et al. 2007).

In addition to the influence of these extrinsic environmental factors, intrinsic factors, such as body size, morphology, and behavior, affect frog feeding (Lima and Magnusson 1998; Maneyro and da Rosa 2004). Morphological constraints on diet can influence microhabitat use and competitive interactions. For example, the presence of well-developed interdigital membranes on the hind feet and eyes positioned dorsolaterally are common features of adult anurans that forage in flooded areas (Huckembeck et al. 2012). Prior studies inferred high dietary similarity between frogs coexisting in the same habitat (Moser et al. 2017), but few studies have evaluated frog dietary overlap in relation to food availability (e.g., Toft 1980; Huckembeck et al. 2014). Even fewer studies have investigated how seasonal changes in frog trophic ecology are associated with morphology and microhabitat use (but see Gutiérrez-Cárdenas et al. 2016; Moser et al. 2017; Ordoñez-Ifarraguerri et al. 2017).

We investigated the trophic ecology of two hylids sympatric in a subtropical wetland to assess relationships of seasonal environmental variation and morphology with dietary diversity and interspecific overlap. Hylidae is the most diverse anuran family (∼982 species) with the widest geographic distribution (distributed on all continents, except the poles; Frost 2017). Most tree frogs are arboreal, but some species are aquatic, semiaquatic, or fossorial (Macale et al. 2008). In the southern Neotropical region, Pseudis minuta and Scinax squalirostris often inhabit wetlands in sympatry, but with contrasting microhabitat use (Huckembeck et al. 2012). Pseudis minuta forages at the water–land interface, whereas S. squalirostris is more often associated with shrubs and phytotelmata in plants (Huckembeck et al. 2012; Kittel and Solé 2015). Both species are trophic generalists with diets dominated by insects and spiders (Huckembeck et al. 2014; Kittel and Solé 2015). These species differ morphologically (e.g., body size, mouth width) and anatomically (e.g., P. minuta has interdigital membranes that should enhance swimming; Macale et al. 2008; Kittel and Solé 2015).

We studied trophic ecology using stomach content analysis (SCA), stable isotope analysis (SIA), and field estimates of prey availability. During recent decades, SIA has become an important tool for investigating trophic ecology (Layman et al. 2012; Phillips et al. 2014), including studies of anurans (Araújo et al. 2007; Trakimas et al. 2011; Carvalho-Rocha et al. 2017). Ratios of heavier and lighter isotopes of carbon (13C/12C) and nitrogen (15N/14N) are often used to estimate the proportional assimilation of food resources into consumer tissues as well as the consumer's vertical trophic position (Peterson and Fry 1987). Stable isotope data have been used to make inferences about trophic ecology, including niche width (Bearhop et al. 2004; Jackson et al. 2011; Cloyed and Eason 2017) and interspecific niche overlap (Swanson et al. 2015). SIA has become more effective when combined with SCA, which allows a more precise and detailed description of a consumer's diet (Winemiller et al. 2011; Condini et al. 2015).

Using two sympatric hylids (P. minuta and S. squalirostris), we investigated the following questions: (1) are there differences in diet composition and food assimilation between coexisting frog species with contrasting morphology and microhabitat use; and (2) do dietary and assimilation patterns in each species change with seasons? We hypothesized that the species with the larger body and mouth sizes and broader use of microhabitats would have a more diverse diet, and that both species would undergo seasonal shifts in diet and food assimilation. More specifically, we hypothesized that, regardless of interspecific differences in morphology and microhabitat use, diets would be more diverse during the warmer and drier period when prey are more available and frog metabolic rates are higher. Aside from adding to the knowledge about the trophic ecology of Neotropical frogs that are relatively understudied, our findings yielded insights about potential mechanisms that facilitate amphibian coexistence.

Materials and Methods

Study Area

The study was conducted in a wetland (31.0651°S, 50.5121°W; datum WGS84) in the northern portion of the Lagoa do Peixe National Park, an area of ∼1.63 ha (Fig. 1). The wetland contains permanent and intermittent water bodies with a maximum depth of 50 cm. Predominant terrestrial vegetation was grasses of Family Poaceae, diverse shrubs, and herbaceous plants (Eryngium spp.) that commonly contain phytotelmata. The dominant aquatic macrophytes were Salvinia herzogii, Azolla filiculoides, Eichhornia crassipes, and Cabomba sp. The regional climate is classified as subtropical humid. Precipitation, evapotranspiration, and temperature data were obtained from Brazil's National Institute of Meteorology (Inmet 2010). We defined a cold/wet and a warm/dry period on the basis of the mean monthly temperature, rainfall, evapotranspiration, and water surplus (net balance rainfall and evapotranspiration; Fig. 2). The cold/wet period during our study period occurred from April through September, when water temperature ranged from 14.1°C to 19.8°C. The warm/dry period occurred from October through March, when air temperature ranged from 18.3°C to 23.7°C.

Fig. 1

Location of the studied wetland (enclosed circle) in Lagoa do Peixe National Park (area enclosed by dotted line) within the extent of the coastal plain habitat of southern Brazil (indicated by black arrow within inset).


Fig. 2

Monthly variation of temperature (°C), rainfall (mm3), and water surplus (mm) during the study period (April 2008–May 2009) at Lagoa do Peixe National Park, Brazil.


Fieldwork and Data Collection

Fieldwork was conducted monthly (1 d/mo) between April 2008 and May 2009 to sample frogs (P. minuta and Scinax squalirostris) and representative species of invertebrates and primary producers. Specimens of P. minuta and S. squalirostris were collected by hand and euthanized in an ice bath before being transported to the laboratory for examination and processing. Frogs were collected at dusk, when these anurans were most active, and each monthly survey involved 2.5 h of searching. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and macrophytes (Salvinia herzogii and Eichhornia crassipes) were sampled using a drop sampler, which was a bottomless plastic bucket covering an area of 0.045 m2. Each month, 18 samples were collected (three samples in three stands per macrophyte species). After collection, aquatic vegetation samples were washed in tap water over a 500-mm mesh sieve that retained associated macroinvertebrates. In addition to aquatic macrophytes, samples of periphyton, particulate organic matter (POM), and leaves from terrestrial plants were collected for estimation of isotopic composition of basal resources. Suspended samples of POM were obtained by filtering water through a precombusted (450°C, 4 h) Whatman glass fiber filter (porosity = 1.2 μm) with the aid of a manual vacuum pump. Periphyton was collected by carefully scraping a thin upper layer of flocculent or consolidated sediment from substrates. Samples of terrestrial vegetation (Kyllinga vaginata and Sporobolus virginicus) were collected by clipping with scissors, and invertebrates associated with terrestrial vegetation (ants, hemipterans, spiders) were sampled using pitfall traps consisting of 500-mL cans buried in the soil and containing 100 mL of water (n = 10/mo). A light trap also was used to collect winged insects (e.g., beetles, mosquitoes, moths). The pitfall traps and light traps were haphazardly distributed in the grassland near the edge of the main water body. All samples (primary producers, invertebrates, and anurans) were stored on ice until transported to the lab where they were kept frozen until processing for SIA and SCA.

Snout–vent length (SVL, ±1 mm) and mandibular width (MW, ±0.1 mm) were measured for each frog specimen, and stomachs were removed through an incision in the abdomen. Food items recovered from stomachs were preserved in 70% ethanol and later identified at the lowest feasible taxonomic level given available identification keys and degree of digestion. Partially digested prey (e.g., fragments of appendages, exoskeleton, or muscle tissue) were classified as animal remains. Following Huckembeck et al. (2014), we estimated the numerical abundance of each prey category in each stomach and its area when spread in a Petri dish (with thickness ∼1 mm and eliminating empty spaces) with the bottom marked in a grid with 1-mm2 squares.

Each frog specimen was dissected to obtain samples of muscle tissue (<5 g) from the posterior limb. Because of their small size (<10 mm), invertebrates could not be dissected to obtain sufficient samples of pure muscle tissue; therefore, invertebrates were processed whole for SIA. Macrophyte leaf samples were rinsed with distilled water and placed in a sterile Petri dish, then dried in an oven at 60°C (for 48 h) before being ground into a fine powder with a mortar and pestle, and placed in Eppendorf tubes for storage. Powdered material was weighed (1 to 3 mg), pressed into ultrapure tin capsules (Costech Analytical Technologies), and sent to the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory of the Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, for analysis of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios. We compared our samples against the carbon and nitrogen standards of marine sedimentary limestone and atmospheric nitrogen, respectively (Peterson and Fry 1987). On the basis of the SD of internal standard replicate samples, analytical precision was 0.14‰ and 0.13‰ for carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios, respectively.

Analysis of Microhabitat Use and Morphology

To evaluate habitat use by the two frog species, we followed the characterization of microhabitats performed by Huckembeck et al. (2012) that included the following parameters: vegetation spatial coverage (% grasses, shrubs, phytotelmata plants, and aquatic plants); average height of the vegetation (cm); average water depth (cm); substrate type (dry, wet, flooded, or underwater); and average distance from a water body (cm). Relative frequencies of occurrence of both species in each microhabitat were evaluated with chi-square tests (Zar 1994). Differences in SVL and MW between species, and warmer vs. colder periods, were assessed by the Mann–Whitney U-test. Data were examined for normality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests), homoscedasticity (F-tests), and independence (autocorrelations of residuals; Hammer 2017).

Analysis of Diet and Prey Availability

Food items encountered during SCA were quantified by the prey-specific index of relative importance (%PSIRI) adapted from Brown et al. (2012), according to the formula:

where %FO is the relative frequency of occurrence of item i based on all stomachs; %NPi is the relative abundance of prey i based on its numerical abundance; and %APi is the relative abundance of prey i based on the its estimated area. Relative abundance values were calculated as the number or area of item i divided by the number of stomachs containing item i.

Frog diet diversity was calculated by Shannon's index, H = −∑pi(log pi), where pi is the proportion (by area) of each prey item found in the diet. Potential differences in H values within species, between seasons, and between species were evaluated by the diversity t-test (Hammer 2017). We also calculated interspecific dietary overlap on the basis of Pianka's index:

where pij and pik are the proportions (by area) of food item i consumed by species j and k, respectively. Differences in prey availability (based on prey abundance and diversity) were evaluated by the student's t-test and diversity t-test (Hammer 2017).

Analysis of Stable Isotope Ratios

To verify the assumption that the isotopic composition of consumer muscle tissue was derived from food assimilated during periods when consumers and resources were collected together (Phillips et al. 2014), we only analyzed isotopic composition of frogs sampled during the final 3 mo of both cold/wet and warm/dry periods. To evaluate patterns of isotopic variation within and between species and periods, we constructed biplots of δ13C vs. δ15N for frogs, representative prey, and dominant aquatic and terrestrial basal sources. The statistical significance of differences between average values of δ13C and δ15N was evaluated with the Mann–Whitney U-test. The relative importance of material assimilated by frogs from various prey and basal food sources and relative vertical trophic positions of the two frog species in the food web were indicated by δ13C and δ15N values, respectively. Following Phillips et al. (2014), food sources with similar isotopic values were pooled together to achieve better resolution in the isotopic mixing models used to estimate assimilation of material from sources. Therefore, when the variability (SD) around the average δ13C values of a prey group (e.g., Aranea) was high (SD > 2.85), the group was divided using a nonhierarchical cluster-analysis K-means (Hammer 2017). We attributed this variability to the diversity of species that compose each group. This procedure resulted in most prey taxa being divided into two groups, one relatively depleted (D) and one enriched (E) in 13C (e.g., Araneae-D vs. Araneae-E; Table 1). We used Mann–Whitney U-tests to assess the statistical significance of differences in prey isotopic values between periods. On the basis of isotopic similarity, basal production sources aggregated into two groups: aquatic producers (aquatic and emergent macrophytes, POM, and periphyton) and terrestrial producers (plants with C4 photosynthesis). Fully terrestrial C3 plants were uncommon in the riparian zone of the wetland and, therefore, were not included in the sampling.

Table 1

Relative importance of food items, as measured by frequency of occurrence (FO), numerical percentage (%NP), and area percentage (%AP), and prey-specific index of relative importance (%PSIRI) in diets of Pseudis minuta and Scinax squalirostris during cold and warm periods at the wetland of Lagoa do Peixe National Park. Bold font indicates highest %PSIRI values for each period.


Relative contributions of food sources to the biomass of the two anuran species, expressed as 95% credibility intervals, were estimated using a Bayesian isotopic mixing model as implemented in the Stable Isotope Analysis in R program (SIAR; Parnell et al. 2010). On the basis of the δ13C-δ15N biplots in which we visualized the spatial trends in the isotopic composition of frogs and their stomach contents, we considered the following resources for the mixing model: Araneae depleted, Odonata, Coleoptera depleted, and Coleoptera enriched for P. minuta; Araneae depleted, Araneae enriched, and Coleoptera enriched for Scinax squalirostris. Mixing models were fit using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method, which generates simulations of the resource contribution to the anurans. These simulations were generated using a Dirichlet prior distribution (Parnell et al. 2010). Each model was run on the basis of 500,000 iterations, discarding the first 50,000 because they are considered noninformative for guiding simulations. We used the mean values (±1 SD) for trophic discrimination factor as determined for postmetamorphic anurans (δ13C: 1.13 ± 0.50‰; δ15N: 2.56 ± 0.50‰; Cloyed et al. 2015; Appendix).

The isotopic space (i.e., areas occupied in C-N isotopic space; Newsome et al. 2007) of each frog species was plotted as a standardized ellipse area corrected for small samples (SEAc) using the program Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R (SIBER; Jackson et al. 2011). SEAc is unaffected by bias associated with sample size, allowing comparison among groups with distinct sample sizes (Jackson et al. 2011). Overlap between isotopic spaces was calculated between periods and species and reported as a percentage of each SEAc (asymmetrical overlap; Albernaz et al. 2016).


Morphological Traits and Microhabitat Use

Forty-three P. minuta specimens (20 from the warm/dry and 23 from the cold/wet period) and 21 S. squalirostris specimens (11 from the warm/dry and 10 from the cold/wet period) were collected in the wetland. The values for body size and mouth width were both greater in P. minuta (SVL = 29.6 ± 4.9 mm, MW = 10.35 ± 1.60 mm) than in S. squalirostris (SVL = 22.2 ± 2.1 mm, MW = 6.40 ± 0.90 mm; SVL: U = 36, z = −5.33, P < 0.001; MW: U = 7.5, z = −3.79, P < 0.001). Values for SVL and MW in P. minuta were similar between periods (SVL: U = 177.50, z = −0.83, P > 0.40; MW: U = 42.50, z = −0.32, P > 0.74). The mean SVL of S. squalirostris was greater during the warm/dry period (23.0 ± 0.7 mm) than the cold/wet period (20.2 ± 3.1 mm; U = 72, z = −2.44, P < 0.01).

We observed interspecific differences in microhabitat use. Most specimens of S. squalirostris were captured on or near plants containing phytotelmata (13 occurrences vs. 3.5 expected at random; χ2 = 25.78, df = 4, P < 0.0001), with only one specimen captured from aquatic macrophytes (1 occurrence vs. 3.5 expected; χ2 = 1.78, df = 4, P < 0.0001). In contrast, all P. minuta were captured from aquatic microhabitats, including floating macrophytes and wetted margins of the main water body, and none was observed on plants bearing phytotelmata.

SCA and Prey Availability

Regardless of the study period, the diversity of diet differed between the two frog species (cold/wet: t = 18.98, df = 119.61, P < 0.001; warm/dry: t = 13.05, df = 58.03, P < 0.001; Table 1), with P. minuta having greater diet diversity (cold/wet: H = 2.08; warm/dry: H = 1.89) than S. squalirostris (cold/wet: H = 0.26; warm/dry: H = 0.34). Interspecific dietary overlap was low in both periods (cold/wet: Oij = 0.12; warm/dry: Oij = 0.17).

For both frog species, diet diversity did not differ between study periods (P. minuta: t = −1.59, df = 87.79, P > 0.11; S. squalirostris: t = −0.31, df = 21.19, P > 0.75). Proportional consumption of prey categories varied between periods for P. minuta: Araneae (%PSIRI = 14.96), Coleoptera (%PSIRI = 9.65), and Hymenoptera (%PSIRI = 8.14) were predominant in the diet during the cold/wet season, whereas Odonata (%PSIRI = 17.19), Hemiptera (%PSIRI = 16.20), and Coleoptera (%PSIRI = 10.88) were more important in the diet during the warm/dry period. In contrast, diet composition of S. squalirostris revealed relatively little temporal variation. Hemiptera was the more important prey in the diet of S. squalirostris during both seasons (%PSIRI, cold/wet = 22.36; warm/dry = 18.80; Table 1).

Prey abundance in the wetland was greater during the warm/dry period (t = −1.92, P < 0.05), but prey diversity was higher during the cold/wet period (cold/wet, H = 2.79; warm/dry, H = 2.59; t = 4.87, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Mean (±1 SD) number of individual invertebrate taxa obtained from surveys conducted during cold/wet (A) and warm/dry (B) periods at the wetland in Lagoa do Peixe National Park, Brazil. Data were square-root transformed.


Isotopic Variability and Food Assimilation

Relative positions of the two frog species and their prey in the δ13C-δ15N biplot indicated interspecific differences in assimilation of carbon and nitrogen from prey and basal sources (Fig. 4). Mean δ13C values of P. minuta ranged from −26.64 to −22.28‰ during the cold/wet period, and from −25.08 to −21.79‰ during the warm/dry period (Fig. 4A). These values were similar between periods (U = 66, z = −0.68, P > 0.49; Table 2), and largely reflected isotopic values of important prey that varied between seasons (Fig. 4A). Mean δ15N values of P. minuta differed between study periods (U = 36, z = −2.21, P < 0.02; Fig. 4A), and ranged from 5.66 to 7.48‰ during the cold/wet period and 4.25 to 7.13‰ during the warm/dry period.

Fig. 4

Mean values (±1 SD) for δ13C and δ15N in sympatric frogs (squares: Pseudis minuta [A] and Scinax squalirostris [B]) and their potential prey (circles) during the cold period (open symbols) and the warm period (filled symbols) at the wetland in Lagoa do Peixe National Park, Brazil. ARA-D = Araneae-depleted, ARA-E = Araneae-enriched, COL-D = Coleoptera-depleted, COL-E = Coleoptera enriched, HEM-D = Hemiptera-depleted, HEM-E = Hemiptera-enriched, ODO-D = Odonata-depleted, ODO-E = Odonata-enriched, ORT-D = Orthoptera-depleted, ORT-E = Orthoptera-enriched, AQU = aquatic producers, and TER = terrestrial producers.


Table 2

Number of samples (n), mean (±1 SD) values for δ13C and δ15N, and P-values from Mann–Whitney U-tests comparing mean isotopic values of frogs and their prey in the wetland of Lagoa do Peixe National Park.


Mean δ13C values of S. squalirostris differed between periods (U = 9, z = −2.32, P < 0.01; Table 2), with values ranging from −23.53 to −19.35‰ during the cold/wet period and from −20.84 to −17.28‰ during the warm/dry period (Fig. 4B). Mean δ15N values of S. squalirostris differed between periods (U = 13, z = −2.09, P < 0.03; Table 2), with values ranging from 6.16 to 7.51‰ during the cold/wet period and from 3.08 to 7.24‰ during the warm/dry period (Fig. 4B).

Carbon isotope ratios of aquatic producers during both periods (cold/wet = −27.26 ± 2.49‰; warm/dry = −29.68 ± 1.91‰) were lower than those of terrestrial producers (cold/wet = −13.91 ± 2.40‰; warm/dry = −10.52 ± 2.40‰; Fig. 4). Average δ13C and δ15N values were similar between periods for any insect prey group (Table 2).

Proportional assimilation of food resources by frogs was estimated using isotopic mixing models. Pseudis minuta had a similar pattern of prey assimilation during the two periods (Fig. 5). Odonata-E was estimated to be the prey assimilated in greatest proportions by P. minuta during the cold/wet period (95% Bayesian credibility interval = 12–61%), followed by Coleoptera-E (30–59%) and Araneae-D (0–42%). This species assimilated prey in similar proportions during the warm/dry period. In contrast, S. squalirostris assimilated prey in different proportions during the two periods. During the cold/wet period, Coleoptera-E was assimilated in greatest proportions (37–86%), followed by Araneae-D (11–47%) and Araneae-E (0–22%). Coleoptera-E, Araneae-D, and Araneae-E made similar contributions to S. squalirostris biomass during the warm/dry period (9–58%, 10–56%, and 1–57%, respectively; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Relative contribution of potential prey to biomass of Pseudis minuta (A = cold/wet period; B = warm/dry period) and Scinax squalirostris (C = cold/wet period; D = warm/dry period) at the wetland in Lagoa do Peixe National Park, Brazil. Bayesian credible intervals of the feasible contributions of each prey category: 50% (dark gray), 75% (medium gray), and 95% (pale gray). ARA-D = Araneae-depleted, ARA-E = Araneae-enriched, COL-D = Coleoptera-depleted, COL-E = Coleoptera enriched, ODO-D = Odonata-depleted.


Both frog species showed shifts in the relative position and size of their isotopic spaces between survey periods (Fig. 6). Pseudis minuta had a larger isotopic space during the cold/wet period (SEAc = 3.41 for cold/wet, 2.45 for warm/dry), and ellipses of the two periods overlapped in isotopic space (Fig. 6). In contrast, the isotopic space occupied by S. squalirostris was greater during the warm/dry period (SEAc = 5.88 for warm/dry, 2.45 for cold/wet). The two periods had little overlap within isotopic space, with separation mostly along the δ13C axis, with the cold/wet-period having lower values (Fig. 6). Overlap between isotopic ellipses of the two periods was much lower for S. squalirostris (0.008) than for P. minuta (0.86). This finding indicated that the resources assimilated by P. minuta had similar isotopic composition during both periods, whereas the resources assimilated by S. squalirostris varied between periods (Fig. 6). There was interspecific overlap in isotopic spaces of the two anurans during only the cold/wet period (asymmetrical overlap = 17.64% for P. minuta, 20.68% for S. squalirostris).

Fig. 6

Isotopic niche space of Pseudis minuta (A) and Scinax squalirostris (B) during the cold/wet period (gray circles) and the warm/dry period (black triangles) at the wetland in Lagoa do Peixe National Park, Brazil.



Our findings support the hypothesis that among sympatric frog species, those that have a larger body and mouth gape and that use a greater array of microhabitats should have a broader trophic niche. Prior studies have suggested that anurans representing several families exhibit a correlation between body size and diet composition, with larger individuals consuming larger prey and having greater volumes of stomach contents (Kittel and Solé 2015). Our findings are consistent with patterns observed for hylid frogs inhabiting a permanent pond in southern Brazil (Miranda et al. 2006). Pseudis minuta is larger, occurred in a wider range of microhabitats, and, as predicted, had a more diverse diet than S. squalirostris. Pseudis minuta often was captured from aquatic microhabitats, including floating macrophytes, but sometimes could be found in terrestrial microhabitats of riparian areas (Huckembeck et al. 2012). In our study system, P. minuta was not associated with herbaceous plants bearing phytotelmata. Scinax squalirostris had a more restricted distribution and was usually captured from plants growing along the wetland margin, either within, or in proximity to, phytotelmata. Similar to our findings, an investigation of hylids inhabiting wetlands in Colombia found interspecific differences in microhabitat use and diet that were associated with variation in body size (Muñoz-Guerrero et al. 2007). Other studies have concluded high niche overlap among frogs sharing the same habitat in tropical and subtropical forests (Toft 1980; Wu et al. 2005). In addition to being larger, Pseudis has traits that are adaptive in aquatic habitats, such as interdigital membranes on the hind feet and the absence of digital pads that are possessed by most hylids (Huckembeck et al. 2014). Scinax lacks interdigital membranes on the hind feet and possesses digital pads typical of tree frogs.

Contrary to our prediction, the isotopic space occupied by the smaller species, S. squalirostris, was larger than that occupied by the larger species. Large isotopic variation among prey inhabiting phytotelmata could explain this pattern. Phytotelmata in subtropical wetlands harbor diverse assemblages of terrestrial and semiaquatic invertebrates (Campos 2010). Given that invertebrates can exhibit substantial variation in their isotopic values over small spatial scales in systems with high environmental heterogeneity (e.g., Willson et al. 2010), we suggest that large levels of isotopic variation might exist among invertebrates from phytotelmata.

Results from SCA did not provide strong evidence corroborating our hypothesis that diets of both frogs would be more diverse during the warm/dry period. We also disregard the influence of body size on the diet between the periods. Scinax squalirostris was greater in the warm/dry period, but we did not consider this minor difference (<3 mm) biologically significant. Diets of both species were fairly consistent during the two survey periods. The relative importance of only a few prey categories varied seasonally within the diet of P. minuta, and Hemiptera were dominant in the diet of S. squalirostris during both periods. In contrast, the diet of a hylid (Boana pulchella) inhabiting ponds in temperate southern Uruguay varied among microhabitats and seasons (Maneyro and da Rosa 2004). Our dietary results should be interpreted with caution, because sample sizes for SCA were small, and some of the material recovered from stomachs was in an advanced state of digestion, especially during the cold/wet period.

Stable isotope analysis did not show differences in proportions of prey assimilated by P. minuta during the two periods. In contrast, S. squalirostris revealed between-period differences in the proportional assimilation of prey categories. The isotope space occupied by S. squalirostris during the warm/dry period was more than double the size of that occupied during the cold/wet period, with higher values of δ13C during the warmer period. We speculate that this difference in carbon isotopic ratios might reflect assimilation of material from herbivorous insects that feed on plants using the C4 photosynthetic pathway (e.g., terrestrial grasses) that typically are enriched in 13C. During the warm/dry period, these insects probably become more available to frogs as wetted marginal areas shrink. In Panamanian highland streams, frogs showed a variation in their isotopic values, indicating that sources of prey vary in riparian areas (Whiles et al. 2006). To evaluate our hypothesis, we suggest that future studies at this site examine the isotopic variation of more invertebrate taxa, as well as C4 grasses.

Our prey availability survey revealed higher prey densities during the warm/dry period. Seasonal variation in invertebrate communities has been reported in other studies of subtropical wetlands, with invertebrate densities increasing and species richness decreasing as water levels recede (Moraes et al. 2014). Both adult and larval communities of anurans in tropical latitudes have been found to respond to changes in resource availability (Toft 1980; Whiles et al. 2006; Altig et al. 2007). However, the two hylids in the present study did not exhibit seasonal dietary variation. Both hylids have been described as opportunistic, generalist predators (Huckembeck et al. 2014; Kittel and Solé 2015). Changes in diets of both frog species seemed to be driven largely by changes in the relative proportions of prey types in their respective microhabitats. Given small sample sizes, however, this inference is tentative.

Isotopic spaces occupied by P. minuta and S. squalirostris overlapped broadly during the cold/wet period when higher rainfall produced a hydrologic pulse that connected aquatic habitats in the wetland (Garcia et al. 2017). Hydrologic connectivity promotes entry of terrestrial invertebrates, vegetation, and riparian detritus into aquatic habitats (Rezende and Mazzoni 2005). During floodplain inundation, new growth of floating aquatic vegetation and emergent riparian plants support spiders, ants, and other terrestrial invertebrates (Campos 2010). Terrestrial arthropods are probably more vulnerable to predation by hylid frogs under these conditions, resulting in stronger linkages between terrestrial and aquatic food-web compartments. Moreover, higher dispersal of invertebrate prey between phytotelmata housed in emergent plants and floating aquatic vegetation (Zilli and Marchese 2011) could have contributed to higher overlap between isotopic spaces of the two frog species during the cold/wet period.

Aquatic ecosystems in subtropical and tropical latitudes are strongly influenced by unimodal or bimodal annual rainfall (Winemiller 1990; Bunn and Arthington 2002), and amphibian ecology should show corresponding temporal responses (Babbitt 2005; Maltchik et al. 2008). Our study revealed an appreciable influence of seasonality on the trophic ecology in only one of the two hylid species. Both of these anurans are trophic generalists that feed opportunistically on insects, but only P. minuta underwent a major seasonal diet shift. Microhabitat use and morphological constraints appear to be important factors that influence the trophic ecology of these species. Nonetheless, both species link aquatic and terrestrial compartments of the wetland food web, and therefore can serve as sensitive indicators of environmental impacts to the system.


We thank International Foundation for Science (grant no. A/4419-1), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; grant no. 482920/2007-6), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (graduate scholarship to SH) for providing research funds. AMG acknowledges fellowship support from CNPq (grant no. 310141/2015-0). This is a contribution of the research group Grupo de Análises de Isótopos Estáveis em Ambientes Aquáticos (GAIA-FURG/CNPq). This study was carried out under a permit provided by the Brazilian National Environmental Agency (ICMBio-SISBIO no. 14523-3).

Literature Cited


Albernaz, T.L., E.R. Secchi, L.R. Oliveira, and S. Botta. 2016. Ontogenetic and gender-related variation in the isotopic niche within and between three species of fur seals (genus Arctocephalus). Hydrobiologia 787:123–139. Google Scholar


Altig, R., M.R. Whiles, and C.L. Taylor. 2007. What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats. Freshwater Biology 52:386–395. Google Scholar


Araújo, M.S., D.I. Bolnick, G. Machado, A.A. Giaretta, and S.F Dos Reis. 2007. Using δ 13 C stable isotopes to quantify individual-level diet variation. Oecologia 152:643–654. Google Scholar


Babbitt, K.J. 2005. The relative importance of wetland size and hydroperiod for amphibians in southern New Hampshire, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:269–279. Google Scholar


Bearhop, S., C.E. Adams, S. Waldron, R.A. Fuller, and H. MacLeod. 2004. Determining trophic niche width: A novel approach using stable isotope analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:1007–1012. Google Scholar


Brown, S.C., J.J. Bizzarro, G.M. Cailliet, and D.A. Ebert. 2012. Breaking with tradition: Redefining measures for diet description with a case study of the Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica (Gilbert 1896). Environmental Biology of Fishes 95:3–20. Google Scholar


Bunn, S.E., and A.H. Arthington. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30:492–507. Google Scholar


Campos, R.E. 2010. Eryngium (Apiaceae) phytotelmata and their macroinvertebrate communities, including a review and bibliography. Hydrobiologia 652:311–328. Google Scholar


Carvalho-Rocha, V., B.C. Lopes, and S. Neckel-Oliveira. 2017. Interindividual patterns of resource use in three subtropical Atlantic Forest frogs. Austral Ecology 43:150–158. Google Scholar


Cloyed, C.S., and P.K. Eason. 2017. Niche partitioning and the role of intraspecific niche variation in structuring a guild of generalist anurans. Royal Society Open Science 4:170060. Google Scholar


Cloyed, C.S., S.D. Newsome, and P.K. Eason. 2015. Trophic discrimination factors and incorporation rates of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in adult Green Frogs, Lithobates clamitans. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 88:576–585. Google Scholar


Condini, M.V., D.J. Hoeinghaus, and A.M. Garcia. 2015. Trophic ecology of dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus (Actinopterygii, Epinephelidae) in littoral and neritic habitats of southern Brazil as elucidated by stomach contents and stable isotope analyses. Hydrobiologia 743:109–125. Google Scholar


Frost, D.R. 2017. Amphibian species of the world: An online reference, version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, USA. Available at Archived by WebCite at on 16 October 2017. Google Scholar


Garcia, A.M., K.O. Winemiller, D.J. Hoeinghaus, . . . C. Ducatti. 2017. Hydrologic pulsing promotes spatial connectivity and food web subsidies in a subtropical coastal ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 567:17–28. Google Scholar


Gutiérrez-Cárdenas, P.D.A., K. Castillo, D. Martinez, C.F.D. Rocha, and M.A. Rojas-Rivera. 2016. Trophic ecology of Pristimantis labiosus (Anura: Craugastoridae) from South-Western Colombia. North-Western Journal of Zoology 12:102–109. Google Scholar


Hammer, Ø. 2017. PAST: Paleontological Statistics, Reference Manual. University of Oslo, Norway. Available at Archived by WebCite at on 16 August 2016. Google Scholar


Hocking, D.J., and K.J. Babbitt. 2014. Amphibian contributions to ecosystem services. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 9:1–17. Google Scholar


Huckembeck, S., M. Claudino, F. Corrêa, R.F. Bastos, D. Loebmann, A.M. Tozetti, and A.M. Garcia. 2012. The activity patterns and microhabitat use of Pseudis minuta Günther, 1858 (Anura, Hylidae) in the Lagoa do Peixe National Park, a biosphere reserve of the Brazilian subtropics. Brazilian Journal of Biology 72:331–336. Google Scholar


Huckembeck, S., D. Loebmann, E.F. Albertoni, S.M. Hefler, M.C. Oliveira, and A.M. Garcia. 2014. Feeding ecology and basal food sources that sustain the Paradoxal frog Pseudis minuta: Multiple approaches combining stomach content, prey availability, and stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 740:253–264. Google Scholar


Inmet (Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia). 2010. Normas climatológicas. Available at Archived by WebCite at on 16 August 2016. Google Scholar


Jackson, A.L., R. Inger, A.C. Parnell, and S. Bearhop. 2011. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. Journal of Animal Ecology 80:595–602. Google Scholar


Kittel, R.N., and M. Solé. 2015. Diet of the striped snouted treefrog Scinax squalirostris (Anura: Hylidae) in southern Brazil. Herpetological Notes 8:157–160. Google Scholar


Layman, C.A., M.S. Araujo, R. Boucek, . . . S. Bearhop. 2012. Applying stable isotopes to examine food-web structure: An overview of analytical tools. Biological Reviews 87:545–562. Google Scholar


Lima, A.P., and W.E. Magnusson. 1998. Partitioning seasonal time: Interactions among size, foraging activity and diet in leaf-litter frogs. Oecologia 116:259–266. Google Scholar


Macale, D., L. Vignoli, and G.M. Carpaneto. 2008. Food selection strategy during the reproductive period in three syntopic hylid species from a subtropical wetland of north-east Argentina. Herpetological Journal 18:49–58. Google Scholar


Maltchik, L., A.S. Rolon, and P. Schott. 2007. Effects of hydrological variation on the aquatic plant community in a floodplain palustrine wetland of southern Brazil. Limnology 8:23–28. Google Scholar


Maltchik, L., C.D. Peixoto, C. Stenert, L.F.B. Moreira, and I. F. Machado. 2008. Dynamics of the terrestrial amphibian assemblage in a flooded riparian forest fragment in a neotropical region in the south of Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 68:763–769. Google Scholar


Maneyro, R., and I. da Rosa. 2004. Temporal and spatial changes in the diet of Hyla pulchella (Anura, Hylidae) in southern Uruguay. Phyllomedusa 3:101–103. Google Scholar


Miranda, T., M. Ebner, M. Solé, and A. Kwet. 2006. Spatial, seasonal and intrapopulational variation in the diet of Pseudis cardosoi (Anura: Hylidae) from the Araucaria Plateau of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology 1:121–130. Google Scholar


Moraes, A.B., C. Stenert, A.S. Rolon, and L. Maltchik. 2014. Effects of landscape factors and hydroperiod on aquatic macroinvertebrates with different dispersal strategies in southern Brazil ponds. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 29:319–335. Google Scholar


Moser, C.F., F.R. De Avila, M. De Oliveira, and A.M. Tozetti. 2017. Diet composition and trophic niche overlap between two sympatric species of Physalaemus (Anura, Leptodactylidae, Leiuperinae) in a subtemperate forest of southern Brazil. Herpetological Notes 10:9–15. Google Scholar


Muñoz-Guerrero, J., V.H. Serrano, and M.P. Ramírez-Pinilla. 2007. Microhabitat use, diet and time of activity of four sympatric neotropical hylid frogs (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia 29:413–425. Google Scholar


Newsome, S.D., C. Martinez Del Rio, S. Bearhop, and D.L. Phillips. 2007. A niche for isotopic ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:429–436. Google Scholar


Ordoñez-Ifarraguerri, A., H.H. Siliceo-Cantero, I. Suazo-Ortuño, and J. Alvarado-Díaz. 2017. Does a frog change its diet along a successional forest gradient? The case of the Shovel-Nosed Treefrog (Diaglena spatulata) in a tropical dry forest in western Mexico. Journal of Herpetology 51:411–416. Google Scholar


Parnell, A.C., R. Inger, S. Bearhop, and A.L. Jackson. 2010. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: Coping with too much variation. PloS One 5:e9672. Google Scholar


Peterson, B.J., and B. Fry. 1987. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:293–320. Google Scholar


Phillips, D.L., R. Inger, S. Bearhop, A.L. Jackson, J.W. Moore, A.C. Parnell, B.X. Semmens, and E.J. Ward. 2014. Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies. Canadian Journal of Zoology 92:823–835. Google Scholar


Post, D.M. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718. Google Scholar


Ranvestel, A.W., K.R. Lips, C.M. Pringle, M.R. Whiles, and R.J. Bixby. 2004. Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: Evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshwater Biology 49:274–285. Google Scholar


Rezende, C.F., and R. Mazzoni. 2005. Seasonal variation in the input of allochthonous matter in an Atlantic Rain Forest stream, Ilha Grande-RJ. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 17:167–175. Google Scholar


Simioni, J.P.D., L.A. Guasselli, and C.B. Etchelar. 2017. Connectivity among wetlands of EPA of Banhado Grande, RS. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos 22:e15. Google Scholar


Swanson, H.K., M. Lysy, M. Power, A.D. Stasko, J.D. Johnson, and J.D. Reist. 2015. A new probabilistic method for quantifying n-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap. Ecology 96:318–324. Google Scholar


Toft, C.A. 1980. Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45:131–141. Google Scholar


Trakimas, G., T.D. Jardine, R. Barisevičiūtė, A. Garbaras, R. Skipitytė, and V. Remeikis. 2011. Ontogenetic dietary shifts in European Common Frog (Rana temporaria) revealed by stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 675:87–95. Google Scholar


Vanderklift, M.A., and S. Ponsard. 2003. Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: A meta-analysis. Oecologia 136:169–182. Google Scholar


Whiles, M.R., K.R. Lips, C.M. Pringle, ... S. Peterson. 2006. The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of neotropical stream ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:27–34. Google Scholar


Willson, J.D., C.T. Winne, M.A. Pilgrim, C.S. Romanek, and J.W. Gibbons. 2010. Seasonal variation in terrestrial resource subsidies influences trophic niche width and overlap in two aquatic snake species: A stable isotope approach. Oikos 119:1161–1171. Google Scholar


Winemiller, K.O. 1990. Spatial and temporal variation in tropical fish trophic networks. Ecological Monographs 60:331–367. Google Scholar


Winemiller, K.O., S.C. Zeug, C.R. Robertson, B.K. Winemiller, and R.L. Honeycutt. 2011. Food-web structure of coastal streams in Costa Rica revealed by dietary and stable isotope analyses. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27:463–476. Google Scholar


Wu, Z., Y. Li, Y. Wang, and M.J. Adams. 2005. Diet of introduced Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): Predation on and diet overlap with native frogs on Daishan Island, China. Journal of Herpetology 39:668–674. Google Scholar


Zar, J.H. 1994. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, USA. Google Scholar


Zedler, J.B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:402–407. Google Scholar


Zilli, F.L., and M.R. Marchese. 2011. Patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages at different spatial scales. Implications of hydrological connectivity in a large floodplain river. Hydrobiologia 663:245–257. Google Scholar



Percent contributions of prey taxa (Bayesian credible interval of 95%) to Pseudis minuta and Scinax squalirostris muscle tissue during cold and warm periods in the wetland of Lagoa do Peixe National Park based on calculations using different values for the trophic discrimination factor: (1) Cloyed et al. (2015), (2) Post (2002), and (3) Vanderklift and Ponsard (2003). ARA-D = Araneae depleted, ARA-E = Araneae enriched, COL-D = Coleoptera depleted, COL-E = Coleoptera enriched, ODO-D = Odonata depleted, ODO-E = Odonata enriched, PSE = Pseudis minuta, SCI = Scinax squalirostris, TDF = trophic discriminaton factor.

© 2018 by The Herpetologists' League, Inc.
Sônia Huckembeck, Kirk O. Winemiller, Daniel Loebmann, and Alexandre M. Garcia "Trophic Ecology of Two Sympatric Frogs with Contrasting Morphology and Habitat Use in a Subtropical Wetland," Herpetologica 74(3), 207-216, (1 September 2018).
Accepted: 12 May 2018; Published: 1 September 2018

Isotopic space
prey availability
stable isotope analysis
Stomach content analysis
Get copyright permission
Back to Top