Kathryn A. Sullivan, Erika M. Tucker, Nicolas J. Dowdy, Julie M. Allen, Vijay Barve, James H. Boone, Sarah E. Bush, Neal L. Evenhuis, Michael Hastriter, Jessica E. Light, Teresa Mayfield-Meyer, Barry M. OConnor, Jorrit H. Poelen, Gabor R. Racz, Katja C. Seltmann, Jennifer M. Zaspel
Insect Systematics and Diversity 7 (6), 1-9, (24 November 2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixad023
KEYWORDS: taxonomy, parasite, bioinformatics, arthropod, biological nomenclature
Classification of the biological diversity on Earth is foundational to all areas of research within the natural sciences. Reliable biological nomenclatural and taxonomic systems facilitate efficient access to information about organisms and their names over time. However, broadly sharing, accessing, delivering, and updating these resources remains a persistent problem. This barrier has been acknowledged by the biodiversity data sharing community, yet concrete efforts to standardize and continually update taxonomic names in a sustainable way remain limited. High diversity groups such as arthropods are especially challenging as available specimen data per number of species is substantially lower than vertebrate or plant groups. The Terrestrial Parasite Tracker Thematic Collections Network project developed a workflow for gathering expert-verified taxonomic names across all available sources, aligning those sources, and publishing a single resource that provides a model for future endeavors to standardize digital specimen identification data. The process involved gathering expert-verified nomenclature lists representing the full taxonomic scope of terrestrial arthropod parasites, documenting issues experienced, and finding potential solutions for reconciliation of taxonomic resources against large data publishers. Although discordance between our expert resources and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility are relatively low, the impact across all taxa affects thousands of names that correspond to hundreds of thousands of specimen records. Here, we demonstrate a mechanism for the delivery and continued maintenance of these taxonomic resources, while highlighting the current state of taxon name curation for biodiversity data sharing.