Criteria for the quality of water and other media are often said to be risk based. However, the relationship between the process of criterion setting and risk assessment has not been clear. This article shows that the conventional framework for risk assessment may be easily modified to represent criterion development. The critical difference is that conventional risk assessments solve an exposure–response model for an expected exposure to estimate an effect, but criterion assessments solve the same model for a benchmark effect to estimate an upper limit to acceptable exposures. Hence, the critical step in criterion setting is the determination of an effect metric that can be modeled and that represents the environmental goal. The same process applies to equivalent assessments, such as deriving screening benchmarks and remedial goals.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2008
What is Meant by Risk-Based Environmental Quality Criteria
Glenn W. Suter,
Susan M. Cormier
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Vol. 4 • No. 4
October 2008
Vol. 4 • No. 4
October 2008
Criteria
environmental quality
Remedial goals
Risk-based
standards