Translator Disclaimer
10 September 2008 Diagnosis of Ecosystem Impairment in a Multiple-Stress Context—How to Formulate Effective River Basin Management Plans
Dick de Zwart, Leo Posthuma, Muriel Gevrey, Peter C. von der Ohe, Eric de Deckere
Author Affiliations +

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is 1 of 12 papers prepared by participants attending the workshop “Risk Assessment in European River Basins–State of the Art and Future Challenges” held in Liepzig, Germany on 12–14 November 2007. The meeting was organized within the framework of the European Commission's Coordination Action RISKBASE program. The objective of RISKBASE is to review and synthesize the outcome of European Commission FP4–FP6 projects, and other major initiatives, related to integrated risk assessment–based management of the water/sediment/soil environment at the river basin scale.

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) of the European Union requires member states to attain a good ecological status for all water bodies by the year 2015. This implies that the bioecological protection endpoint itself is upfront, next to abiotic chemical quality standards, as tools to protect those endpoints. Within the requirements of the Directive, ecological status and abiotic conditions will be monitored extensively. Based on the analysis of the monitoring data, authorities are required to derive Programs of Measures (PoMs) for impacted sites. Optimization of these programs requires diagnosis, to provide site-specific or catchment-specific information on the causes of observed deviations from a good ecological status. This article shows one pilot analysis of monitoring data (Scheldt River, Belgium) compiled in the scope of the EU MODELKEY project. Ecological, ecotoxicological, and statistical models are combined to quantify local ecological impact magnitudes and to identify site-specific factors that are associated with those impacts. Results show significant ecological effects in terms of taxa loss at study sites, which are highly variable among sites, with variable combinations of environmental factors associated with those effects. The results of the diagnostic approach are discussed, which appear to be complementary to the assessment of chemical status required by the Directive. Both types of assessment are useful to assist in the derivation of optimized PoMs. In addition, it could be concluded that the acute toxic pressure parameter relates to reduced taxon abundance for more than half of the studied taxa and that this parameter relates to the fraction of taxa lost under field conditions. Finally, various lessons for the execution of monitoring programs are derived because the Scheldt (bio)monitoring data set has its weaknesses, although it can be seen as typical for current monitoring programs.

Dick de Zwart, Leo Posthuma, Muriel Gevrey, Peter C. von der Ohe, and Eric de Deckere "Diagnosis of Ecosystem Impairment in a Multiple-Stress Context—How to Formulate Effective River Basin Management Plans," Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 5(1), 38-49, (10 September 2008).
Received: 29 April 2008; Accepted: 1 October 2008; Published: 10 September 2008

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Scheldt River
Toxic pressure
Get copyright permission
Back to Top