K.L. O'Hara, A. Bonĉina, J. Diaci, I. Anić, M. Boydak, M. Curovic, Z. Govedar, N. Grigoriadis, S. Ivojevic, S. Keren, H. Kola, G. Kostov, M. Medarević, M. Metaj, N.V. Nicolescu, G. Raifailov, P.T. Stancioiu, N. Velkovski
International Forestry Review 20 (1), 130-143, (1 March 2018) https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818822824228
KEYWORDS: Balkans, selection silviculture, coppice systems, Austrian-Hungarian Empire, Ottoman Empire
Silvicultural practices are generally developed to meet societal objectives given the constraints of the site. This simple premise is a foundation of modern silviculture. However, silviculture may vary for other reasons related to cultural factors. This paper reviews the differences in silviculture in the twelve countries that comprise southeastern Europe, an area that includes a variety of cultures, and a complex history. The silviculture generally follows three models: coppice systems that are largely unregulated, even-aged stands that include former coppice stands and other reforested sites, and systems to develop and maintain complex stand structures. Plantation management is not common. Cultural and historic drivers have affected the development of silviculture in this region. Additional drivers include forest access, the importance of wood for fuel, and proximity to central Europe. It is anticipated that European Union membership of countries in the region will lead to greater regional and international exchange and cooperation in the future.