How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2014 Root Growth of Two Perennial Grass Types and Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) in Temperate Grasslands of North America
Chengchou Han, Stephen L. Young
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Root architecture of prairie grasslands, which depends on plant phenology and edaphic conditions, strongly influences susceptibility to invasion by nonindigenous plant species. Field studies were conducted to compare in situ root growth patterns of warm-season (WS) and cool-season (CS) perennial grasses and musk thistle during a 2-yr period that included a drought in the second year. In 2 yr, CS grasses had the highest amount of roots (1,296 m roots m−2 [395 ft roots ft−2]) across shallow (0 to 28 cm [0 to 11 in.]), medium (28 to 56 cm), and deep (56 to 98 cm) depths with 65% occurring in the shallow depths. However, roots of WS grasses were always greater at deeper depths compared to roots of CS grasses. The amount of new roots in CS grasses was statistically different in 2011 (F2,43  =  33.3, P < 0.0001) at all depths for vegetative (April to May), inflorescence (June), and dormant (July to November) stages. In 2012, the amount of new roots in CS and WS grasses was statistically different (F2,60  =  81.7, P < 0.0001 and F2,37  =  8.0, P  =  0.0013), respectively, for vegetative (April to May), inflorescence (May to June), and dormant (June to November) stages. For both years, the amount of new roots in the CS grasses showed an interaction between the three growth stages and three soil depths (F2,62  =  33.3, P < 0.0001 [2011]; F4,60  =  18.6, P < 0.0001 [2012]). From germination to senescence, the total amount of musk thistle roots was 298 m roots m−2, which was less than the CS (1,296 m roots m−2) and WS (655 m roots m−2) grasses. The largest proportion of new musk thistle roots (61%) (F2,42  =  40.4, P < 0.0001) occurred during the bolting stage (April to June) of the second year. These results show the difference in root distribution of two grass types and the niches that are created underground by extraneous conditions (e.g., drought) in WS grass stands that may contribute to the establishment of musk thistle, an invasive plant species in many North American regions.

Nomenclature: Musk thistle, Carduus nutans L. CRUNU.

Management Implications: In established or newly restored grasslands, niches can occur that allow for the invasion of exotic plant species. This study examined root distribution patterns of cool-season and warm-season perennial grass species and musk thistle. Grown individually, cool-season perennial grasses had a greater number of active roots in the upper soil profile (0 to 28 cm), whereas warm-season perennial grasses had more roots that were active deeper (56 to 98 cm) in the soil. Musk thistle roots were found to dominate the upper soil profile (0 to 28 cm). Even though the two grasses and musk thistle were grown separately, predictions can be made relating to the potential for which grass type will be more susceptible to the invader. The lack of uniform root distribution in the upper soil profile by warm-season perennial grasses could contribute to the establishment of musk thistle. Further, under alternating years of normal and below-normal annual precipitation, musk thistle seedlings could germinate and grow as small rosettes in poorly managed grasslands during the first year (wet) and then continue rosette development, bolting, and flowering in the second year (drought) as roots are extended more fully throughout the soil profile. Therefore, land managers that have problems with musk thistle or an invasive plant species with similar life history (e.g., Scotch thistle, bull thistle) should consider (1) using a mix of perennial grass types and (2) not stressing grassland plants by overgrazing, especially during extreme drought conditions.

Weed Science Society of America
Chengchou Han and Stephen L. Young "Root Growth of Two Perennial Grass Types and Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) in Temperate Grasslands of North America," Invasive Plant Science and Management 7(3), 387-397, (1 July 2014). https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00081.1
Received: 12 October 2013; Accepted: 1 March 2014; Published: 1 July 2014
KEYWORDS
Cool-season perennial grass
distribution
disturbance
drought
invasion
minirhizotron
warm-season perennial grass
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top