Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2002 Genetics and Fitness Costs of Cyromazine Resistance in the House Fly (Diptera: Muscidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The genetic basis of cyromazine resistance was investigated in the house fly, Musca domestica L. The ED-R strain, which was collected in Mississippi and selected further in the laboratory, was 116.5-fold resistant compared with the laboratory susceptible strain, OR-S. The SEL strain, which was created by crossing ED-R with OR-S followed by three cycles of reselection and backcrossing to OR-S, was 84.7-fold resistant relative to the susceptible strain. Mortality data from reciprocal crosses of resistant and susceptible flies indicated that resistance was autosomal and not influenced by maternal effects. The relative position of probit lines from the parental strains and reciprocal crosses showed that resistance was expressed as an incompletely dominant trait with D = 0.30 and 0.32 for ED-R and SEL, respectively. To determine the number of genes involved, models of one, two, three, four, and five loci were used to compare observed and expected mortality of F1ED-R × susceptible backcross. Resistance was best described by a polygenic model of three loci when equal and additive effects of loci were assumed. Another approach, which was based on phenotypic variances, showed that nE, or the minimum number of freely segregating genetic factors for ED-R, equaled 3.07. ED-R showed greater reductions in fitness compared with SEL independent of the presence or absence of sublethal concentrations of cyromazine. These data suggested that reduced fitness was not due to deleterious pleiotropic effects of the resistance genes themselves but arose from other loci in the ED-R genotype.

Juliet D. Tang, Michael A. Caprio, D. Craig Sheppard, and Douglas M. Gaydon "Genetics and Fitness Costs of Cyromazine Resistance in the House Fly (Diptera: Muscidae)," Journal of Economic Entomology 95(6), 1251-1260, (1 December 2002). https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1251
Received: 4 April 2002; Accepted: 1 June 2002; Published: 1 December 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top