Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2010 Biology and Feeding Behaviour of Ladybird, Clitostethus arcuatus, the Predator of the Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae, in Fars Province, Iran
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is considered as one of the most important natural biological control agents of the ash whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Iran. In the current survey, the development, survival, longevity, fecundity, feeding behaviour, and population dynamics of the predator under laboratory and field conditions were studied. The longevity of female insects was significantly longer than that of males. Total feeding of 4th larval instars and females was significantly higher than males and other larval instars. The overall mortality rate from egg to adult under laboratory conditions was 22.7% while under field conditions it was 38.2%. Copulation lasted approximately 67 minutes while the average pre-mating and pre-oviposition times recorded were 3.8 and 1.8 days, respectively. The mean number of eggs laid by each female was 181. The adults could survive starvation for 4 days with a normal longevity of 62–73 days. The maximum population density of the predator was recorded in late August that coincided with the decline of the S. phillyreae population. C. arcuatus had four generations per year, and the adults were observed until mid December. Possible application of C. arcuatus for biological control of S. phillyreae in integrated pest management programs is discussed.

Introduction

Whiteflies feed heavily on plant sap and produce sticky honeydew. Ash whitefly (Siphoninus phillyreae) (Halliday) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a small white sap sucking insect that occurs in both temperate and Mediterranean climates. Nymphs and adults of this pest cause economic damage on the host plants mainly by feeding on plant sap from late May to mid December (Alemansoor and Fallahzadeh 2004). The highest population density of this pest occurs on ash trees, but more than seventeen other host plants (including apple, pears, apricot, acer, and plum) are reported under its host range in Fars Province of Iran (Alemansoor and Fallahzadeh 2004). It can also be found on many small trees and shrubs during outbreaks (Caon and de Barro 1999). Heavy infestations of S. phillyreae can cause stress to apple and pear trees, resulting in premature leaf drop, wilting, and smaller fruit size in Europe (Caon and de Barro 1999). Outbreaks of S. phillyreae frequently occur when their natural enemies have been disturbed or destroyed by pesticides or other factors (Flint 2002).

S. phillyreae has several natural enemies that can control its population to levels under the economic threshold. These natural enemies include predators such as Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptrea: Coccinellidae), Menochilus spp., and Scymnus pallidivestis and parasites such as Coccophagus eleaphilus, Encarsia gautieri, Encarsia inaron, Encarsia partenopea, Encarsia siphonini, Encarsia pseudopartenopea; Eretmocerus siphonini, and Eretmocerus corni (Nguyen and Hamon Avas 2000).

Among various parasitoids, predators and pathogens reported on S. phillyreae, the ladybird beetles have long been used as biological control agents (Onillon 1990; Obrycki and Kring 1998). In their recent studies, Alemansoor and Fallahzadeh (2004) reported C. arcuatus as a good candidate for controlling the pest in Fars. This ladybird beetle belongs to the subfamily Scymninae (the tribe Scymnini) and preys on species of Homoptera (Buntin and Tamaki 1980).

C. arcuatus is widely distributed in the Palaearctic region and was also reported from the former USSR (Agekyan 1977), Sardinia (Delrio et al. 1979; Ortus and Ibba 1985), Portugal (Magalhaes 1980), Africa (Fursch 1987), Italy (Gargani 1990), the USA (Bellows et al. 1990a; 1992b), Germany (Ziegler 1993), former Yugoslavia (Peric et al. 1997), Greece (Katsoyannos et al. 1998) and Iraq (Al-Alaf et al. 2001). In Iran, C. arcuatus was reported for the first time by Yazdani and Assadi (1989) in Fars Province and since then has been observed in other parts of the country (Lotfalizadeh 2001; Tavadjoh 2005) (Figure 1).

The predator prefers Aleyrodid species (Mills 1981) and has been used to control S. phillyreae in California. It preys on other species of Homoptera (Buntin and Tamaki 1980) including Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Bemisia tabaci (Gerling et al. 2001), Dialeurodes citri (Agekyan 1977; Basiri et al. 2004), Aleurotrahelus jelinekii (Mills 1981), and Aleurodes proletella (Bathon and Pietrzik 1986). In addition it also feeds on the eggs of Tetranychus urticae (Liotta et al. 2003) as well as aphids (Gerling et al. 2001).

A decline in the population of S. phillyreae was observed in all locations in Egypt after the release of the predator C. arcuatus. The population of C. arcuatus increased in all experiments following its release (AbdRabou 2006). The population of C. arcuatus spread over a wider area all the way from the northwest of Iran to coastal lines of Persian Gulf. Bathon and Pietrzik (1986) reported the colonization of the predator in the warmest regions of Central Europe. Although C. arcuatus is widely distributed in Iran, only a few studies have been conducted on the biology of this predator. The objective of this study was to investigate the biology and feeding behaviour of C. arcuatus as one of the potentially important biological control agents of S. phillyreae.

Materials and Methods

Rearing of C. arcuatus

Adults of the whitefly & phillyreae were collected from trees in nature, and a stand of 30 young ash trees in Shiraz were artificially infested with the pest. The infested trees were then maintained as a colony for further studies. The predator C. arcuatus (Figures 2A to E) was also collected from ash trees in April and were reared on young infested trees under field conditions. A culture of C. arcuatus fed on S. phillyreae on whitefly -infested ash leaves were reared in 51 mm polystyrene Petri dishes under laboratory conditions. The predators were additionally fed with syrup of honey made by adding one teaspoonful of honey in 100 ml water. Rearing containers were kept under laboratory conditions at 27 ± 1° C, 38 ± 2% RH, and a photoperiod of 16:8 L:D photoperiod.

Figure 1.

Distribution of Clitostethu. arcuatus in Iran. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.eps

Biological studies conducted in the laboratory

Six pairs of newly emergent C. arcuatus were chosen, and each pair was placed separately in a Petri dish to evaluate daily oviposition and to measure their fecundity. Thirty five C. arcuatus eggs were transferred individually into separate Petri dishes to estimate the egg to adult mortality rate. The incubation period of the eggs and the lifetime of different larval stages, prepupae, pupae, and the adults were also recorded, with a difference for the latter in which only six pairs of adults were used. The mean duration of 36 pre-copulation times (the time between emergence of the adults and their first copulation) were recorded for twelve pairs of C. arcuatus. The time required for a copulated female to lay her eggs was also determined. One hundred pupae were collected from ash trees, and the number of males and females were recorded to determine the sex ratio.

Biological studies conducted in the field

Six pairs of newly emergent predators were chosen and placed separately in a clip cage (6 cm in diameter) to evaluate the daily oviposition and fecundity. Thirty five eggs of C. arcuatus were transferred individually into thirty five clip cages mounted onto handpicked ash leaves with more or less evenly infestation to the ash whitefly to determine the egg to adult mortality rate. The incubation period of the eggs and lifetime of different larval stages, prepupae, and pupae were also recorded. The lifetime of the adults was recorded for six pairs using methods similar to those from the laboratory study. In order to determine the number of generations, twenty different stages of the C. arcuatus were kept under natural conditions in small separate clip cages and were then observed daily to determine their longevity and generation time. The number of C. arcuatus on five trees was counted for 15 min (between 9:45 and 10:00 am) every week from spring until late autumn in order to estimate the population density. The area around the host plants that were used for the field experiments was checked during winter to determine C. arcuatus hibernation sites.

Figure 2.

Developmental stages of the ladybird (Clitostethus arcuatus): Egg, A–B; Larva, C; Pupa, D; and Adult, E. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.eps

Feeding behaviour of C. arcuatus

Daily and the overall feeding of each active stage (larval and adult) of C. arcuatus were measured by placing 20 newly emergent samples of each stage in separate Petri dishes. Ten adults were randomly selected and placed in separate Petri dishes to investigate starvation tolerance and daily mortality of C. arcuatus adults. Daily observations were recorded from each adult without feeding them. To study the feeding behaviour, 15 adults were randomly selected from a population of C. arcuatus that had previously been starved for 24 hours and then exposed to 120 S. phillyreae eggs as a food supply. Subsequently, the feeding rate of each adult was recorded hourly for the first 6 h after adding the eggs and again at 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h.

Table 1.

Daily oviposition and total eggs of Clitostethus arcuatus per female at 27 ± 1°C (SEM: Standard Error of Mean)

t01_01.gif

Table 2.

The longevity (day) and mortality (%) of different growth stages of Clitostethus arcuatus under laboratory conditions (SEM: Standard Error of Mean).

t02_01.gif

Results

Biology of C. arcuatus under laboratory conditions

The mean number of eggs laid per day per female was 2.3 ± 03 with a total of 181.8 ± 5.0 eggs per female during its lifetime (6 pairs) (Table 1). The mean duration of egg incubation, larval (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) and pupal stages of C. arcuatus was 3.8 ± 0.1, (2.5 ± 0.1, 3.5 ± 0.1, 3.4 ± 0.1, 4.3 ± 0.1), and 3.9 ± 0.1 days, respectively (Table 2). The adults of C. arcuatus survived for 62– 73 days, and the predator lifetime under laboratory conditions was 19.1 ± 0.2 days. The highest mortality rate was recorded for the first larval instar (6.2%) and the mortality from egg to adult was 22.7% (Table 2). Pre-copulation time averaged 3.8 days, and the mean length of copulation time was 67.1 minutes. The results showed that the mated females laid their eggs after 1.8 ± 0.3 days. The females laid their eggs individually on the lower side of the leaf surface among S. phillyreae eggs. The C. arcuatus females preferred to lay their eggs close to the mass of S. phillyreae eggs and in the empty puparia of S. phillyreaethrough their exit holes left by emerging parasitoids from emerging parasitoid larvae (Figures 2A, 2B). The calculated sex ratio of C. arcuatus under laboratory conditions was found to be 1:1.38 (female:male).

Biology of C. arcuatus under field condition

The mean number of eggs laid by C. arcuatus per day per female was 2.7 ± 0.5 with a total of 193.2 ± 5.6 eggs per female throughout its entire lifetime (Table 3). The mean durations of the egg incubation, larval and pupal stages of C. arcuatus are shown in Table 4. The adult C. arcuatus survived 63–77 days, and its lifetime under field conditions was 20.2 ± 0.1 days. The mortality of the egg-adult period for C. arcuatus was 38.2%. C. arcuatus was commonly active for eight months (from April to December) in the Shiraz region, having four generations per year. The population density of the predator steadily increased from mid July until it reached a first main peak in mid August and declined gradually followed by another increase leading to a second main peak in mid October (Figure 3). C. arcuatus usually prepares for hibernation in mid December when the ash leaves begin to shed, and their hibernating areas include host plant debris, clods of earth, and the cracks of tree barks. It played a significant role in the reduction of the S. phillyreae population and showed a capacity to suppress the S. phillyreae population as its population increased during summer months.

Table 3.

Daily oviposition and total eggs per female of Clitostethus arcuatus under field conditions (SEM: Standard Error of Mean)

t03_01.gif

Figure 3.

The population dynamics of the ladybird (Clitostethus arcuatus) on Siphoninus phillyreae in Shiraz in 2005. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.eps

Feeding behaviour of C. arcuatus

Feeding by C. arcuatus started 15 min after eclosion of the first larval instar, and the adults can consume an egg in 15–20 s. Newly hatched 1st instar C. arcuatus larvae were relatively immobile and fed on S. phillyreae eggs and nymphs over a limited leaf surface area. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th larval instars of C. arcuatus moved rapidly on the leaf surface and fed on all nymphal stages of the host while showing a preference for eggs. Total feeding by larva of C. arcuatus amounted to 259 ± 3 S. phillyreae eggs The total number of eggs consumed by males and females of C. arcuatus was 2024 ± 39 and 4023 ± 74, respectively (Table 5).

The adults of C. arcuatus survived starvation for a maximum period of 4 days. The greatest loss of adult C. arcuatus due to starvation occurred in the second day (Figure 4). To assess feeding rate of the predator, 15 adult C. arcuatus were randomly selected from a population that had previously been starved for 24 hours and exposed to 120 S. phillyreae eggs as a food supply. The consumption of eggs was recorded hourly for the first 6 h after feeding and again at 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h after feeding. The results showed that highest and lowest feeding activity occurred in the 2nd and 5th hours, respectively. There was a sharp increase in feeding in the 2nd hour after feeding followed by a steady decline until the 5th hour where the feeding rate dropped to its minimum and began to increase slowly to reach to a second smaller peak at 12 hours after feeding, which was followed by a less steep increase. The differences observed between feeding rates of starved predators at different hours after feeding were highly significant (Figure 5).

Table 4.

The longevity (day) and mortality (%) of different growth stages of Clitostethus arcuatus under field conditions (SEM: Standard Error of Mean).

t04_01.gif

Table 5.

Daily and total feeding of eggs in the larval instars and adults of Clitostethus arcuatus (SEM: Standard Error of Mean).

t05_01.gif

Discussion

Biological studies on C. arcuatus showed that the mean duration of egg development, larval and pupal stages were 3.8, 11.4 and 3.9 days, respectively. Egg incubation time was relatively shorter than the value reported by Agekyan (1977), which might be attributed to the fact that the host Dialeurodes citri, was different. From our studies C. arcuatus adults survived for 62– 73 days on S. phillyreae eggs, which is considerably lower than the survival of C. arcuatus on Aleurodes proletella, which was reported to be approximately 150 days (Liotta 1981). The longevity of females (73 days) is was higher than males (62 days), which is consistent with the results of other studies (Bellows et al. 1992).

The first larval instar had the highest mortality rate, and the mortality of egg to adult was 22.7%, which is consistent with results from Bellows et al. (1992), who reported egg to adult survival of 78% (Table 6). A higher mortality rate for the first larval instar is conceivable because this instar is the most vulnerable stage for C. arcuatus, followed by the 2nd, 3rd and 4th instars. Mortality of C. arcuatus stabilizes after the 2nd instar. Immature instars of higher stages survive adverse environmental conditions better and accordingly have a lower mortality rate.

Figure 4.

Daily losses in adults of Clitostethus arcuatus during the starvation period. Values are the means of four replicates; error bars represent standard error of the mean. High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.eps

Figure 5.

Feeding behaviour of Clitostethus arcuatus in a 24-h period. Values are the means of four replicates; error bars represent standard error of the mean. High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.eps

Egg mortality, while high, was still lower than the mortality of the first instar. “The eggs were laid mainly in the empty puparia of S. phillyreae through the exit holes left by emerging parasitoids which might provide more protection for the eggs. Our results also showed that the development from egg to adult required an average of 15.6 days and that the average survival ability of the females was 82 days. The results of the experiments were produced under laboratory conditions (27 ± 1° C, 38 ± 2% RH and 16:8 L:D) which was close to the optimum temperature (28.2° C) for the development, survival, and fertility of C. arcuatus reported by Bellows et al. (1992).

Our studies reported a lower sex ratio (1:1.38) for C. arcuatus as compared to the sex ratio (1:1) reported by Bellows et al. (1992).. In addition, the mean number of eggs laid per day per female in present experiments was 2.3 ± 0.3, with a total of 182 ± 5 eggs per female throughout its entire lifetime, which is lower than the 202 eggs per day per female reported by Bellows et al. (1992) (Table 6).

Genetic heterogeneity of the local populations of C. arcuatus added to the inherent demographic stochasticity of C. arcuatus individuals and possibly the use of S. phillyreae as prey may account for minor inconsistencies between our results and other findings. C. arcuatus is normally active for eight months, from April to December, in the Shiraz region where it has four generations per year. Although the number of generations per year was quite close to that reported from Italy (Liotta 1981), the study conducted in Germany reported three generations per year (Bathon and Pietrzik 1986).

Table 6.

Comparison of records of biological and feeding behaviour biometrics of the predator Clitostethus arcuatus between present study and results of other studies

t06_01.gif

The larvae of C. arcuatus feed mainly on S. phillyreae eggs and nymphs, and possibly adults (Bathon and Pietrzik 1986). They can also feed on some species of Tetranichidae (Yazdani and Assadi 1989). C. arcuatus larvae puncture the eggs or nymphs of whiteflies using their mouthparts and suck their contents. This type of feeding behaviour is a characteristic feature of Scymnus species (Buntin and Tamaki 1980; Brown et al. 1995).

Our results show that under laboratory conditions, each larva of C. arcuatus is capable of consuming of up to 260 S. phillyreae eggs during its life time. It has A. proletella in central Europe where each larva consumes about 544 ± 189 eggs during its lifetime (Bathon and Pietrzik 1986). C. arcuatus larvae are reported to consume an average of 444 whitefly eggs on B. tabaci (Al-Alaf et al. 2001). Each male and female consumes about 27.4 and 60.7 whitefly eggs per day, respectively (Bathon and Pietrzik 1986). Agekyan (1977) observed that C. arcuatus has a preference for eggs and 1st instar nymphs of S. phillyreae. Lower consumption rates of the eggs of B. tabaci (approximately 444) C. arcuatus larvae (Al-Alaf et al. 2001) may be accounted for by host differences and differential egg consumptions by males and females, which are 27.4 and 60.7 eggs of A. proletella per day, respectively (Bathon and Pietrzik 1986). Further research on this will certainly be required to clarify the host effect on the biology and feeding behaviour of C. arcuatus (Table 6).

In this study, the larval and adult stages of C. arcuatus showed cannibalistic behaviour. The larvae fed on conspecific eggs, younger instars, and even pupae, while the adults fed mainly on the eggs. Similar observations on cannibalistic behaviour of different stages of C. arcuatus have been reported from Italy (Liotta 1981).

Natural enemies have a central role in successful reduction of the economic damage levels of pests and attempts should focus on an integrated approach that can employ a diverse range of tactics to help produce an environment favourable to them. A reasonable approach toward the control of ash whitefly, S. phillyreae might be to look for natural enemies that will become established and lower the pest population in the wild. Based on these findings, the predator C. arcuatus has a relatively short lifetime and rapid reproduction rate (four generations per year) and can be considered a potentially important biocontrol agent in Iran. Integrated & phillyreae management requires consistent and reliable data on the biology of this key predator. A comparison of these findings on C. arcuatus show some differences with the results of the few other studies conducted on its biology.

The results obtained from the data collected in field studies are often preferred and more reliable since they account for the effect of numerous unknown influencing factors that could be controlled otherwise in a laboratory study. However, for the same reason, lower accuracy of the results from field observations is common. Alternatively laboratory studies produce results that are consistent and reproducible, but they do not reproduce a comprehensive image of the inherent natural randomness of the reality. Neither the lab nor the field studies are perfect alone, and hence this study benefited from a combination of both laboratory trials and field observations.

Further research both in the laboratory under controlled conditions and in the field is required to study the possibility of mass rearing and application of C. arcuatus as a candidate for biological control of S. phillyreae in integrated pest management programs, especially under greenhouse conditions.

References

1.

S Abd-Rabou . 2006. Biological control of the pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae: Aleyrodinae) by using the bioagent, Clitostethus arcuatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of Entomology 3(4): 331–335. Google Scholar

2.

NG Agekyan . 1977. Clitostethus arcuatus Rossi (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) - A predator of citrus whitefly in Adzharia. Entomologicheskoe-Obozrenie 56(1): 31– 33. Google Scholar

3.

NT Al-Alaf , AA Ali , KM A-Adil . 2001. Integration of the IGR Applaud® and the predators, Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) and Orius albidipennis Reut., for controlling the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gen. in Iraq. Arab Journal of Plant Protection 19(2) : 119–124. Google Scholar

4.

H Alemansoor , M. Fallahzadeh 2004. Bioecology of ash whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (Halliday) (Horn. Aleyrodidae) in the Fars Province, Iran. Pajouhesh-vaSazandegi 62: 64–70. Google Scholar

5.

GH Basiri , M Allahyari , MT Fasihi . 2004. Parsaitoids and predators of citrus aleyrodids in south of Iran. pp. 44, Proceeding of the 16th Iranian Plant Protection Congress 28 August-1 September, Tabriz, Iran. Google Scholar

6.

H Bathon , J Pietrzik . 1986. On the food consumption of Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae), a predator of Aleurodes proletella L. (Homoptera, Aleurodidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 102(4): 321–326. Google Scholar

7.

TS Bellows , TB Paine , KY Arakawa , C Meisenbacher , P Leddy , J Kabashim . 1990. Biological control sought for ash whitefly. California Agriculture (Berkeley) 44: 4–6. Google Scholar

8.

TS Bellows , TD Paine , D Gerling . 1992. Development, survival, longevity, and fecundity of Clitostethus arcuatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Siphoninus phillyreae (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in the laboratory. Environmental Entomology 21(3): 659–663. Google Scholar

9.

JK Brown , DR Froehlich , RC Rosell . 1995. The sweet potato or silver leaf whiteflies: Biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or a species complex.\ Annual Review of Entomology 40: 511–34. Google Scholar

10.

LA Buntin , G Tamaki . 1980. Bionomic of Scymnus marginicollis (Coloptera: Coccinellidae). Canadian Entomologist 112(7): 675–680. Google Scholar

11.

G Caon , Barro P De . 1999. Ash Whitefly-A New Pest. Nursery Industry Association of Australia. Available from:  http://www.ngia.com.au/publication_resources/NP_Pdf/NP_1999-07.pdf. Google Scholar

12.

G Delrio , S Ortu , R Prota . 1979. Aspects of integrated control in the citrus cultures of Sardinia. Studi-Sassaresi 27: 205–232. Google Scholar

13.

ML Flint . 2002. Pests in Gardens and landscapes. Available from:  http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PDF/PESTNOTES/pnwhiteflies.pdf. Google Scholar

14.

H Fursch . 1987. New African species of Scymnini as predators of cassava pests. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 100(4): 387– 394. Google Scholar

15.

E Gargani . 1990. Observations on Dialeurodes citri and its natural enemies in Tuscany. Redia 73(1): 7–16. Google Scholar

16.

D Gerling , O Alomar , J Arno . 2001. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids. Crop Protection 20: 779–799. Google Scholar

17.

P Katsoyannos , DC Kontodimas , GJ Stathas . 1998. The inundative release of Cales noacki for curative treatment of Aleurothrixus floccosus on heavily infested citrus in Greece. Annales de Institut Phytopathologique Benaki 18(2): 111–122. Google Scholar

18.

G Liotta . 1981. Osservazioni bio-etologiche su Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Sicilia. Redia 64: 173–185. Google Scholar

19.

G Liotta , A Agro , ML Pinto . 2003. Biological control in citrus groves in the last 50 years: Three successful cases in Western Sicily. Bulletin OILB SROP 26(6): 171–173. Google Scholar

20.

H Lotfalizadeh . 2001. Sex determination in some ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fauna of Moghan region. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 20(1): 61–76. Google Scholar

21.

GS Magalhaes . 1980. Note on the introduction of Aleurothrixus floccosus in south Portugal and its control by Cales noacki How. (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) Proceedings of the International Symposium of IOBC/WPRS on Integrated Control in Agriculture . Vienna, 1979-10/12. Google Scholar

22.

NJ Mills . 1981. Essential and alternative foods for some British Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Entomological Gazette 32: 197–202. Google Scholar

23.

R Nguyen , Avas B Hamon . 2000. Ash whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae: Aleyrodinae). University of Florida IFAS Extension EENY-147. Google Scholar

24.

JJ Obrycki , TJ Kring . 1998. Predaceous Coccinellidae in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 295–321. Google Scholar

25.

JC Onillon . 1990. The use of natural enemies for the biological control of whiteflies. In: D Gerling , editor. Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management , pp. 287 – 313. Intercept Ltd. Google Scholar

26.

S Ortu , I Ibba . 1985. Aleurothrixus floccosus (Mask.) in Sardinia. Atti XIV Congr. Naz. Ital. di Entomol, Accadem. Naz. Italian. Di Entomologia pp. 607–614. Google Scholar

27.

P Peric , N Dimic , S Krnjajic , M Vukša , M Cvetkovic . 1997. Biological control of the whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum W., in Yugoslavia. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 462: 83–88. Google Scholar

28.

Z Tavadjoh . 2005. Surveys on the biology and population fluctuation of ladybird Clitostethus arcuatus, the predator of ash whitefly in Shiraz. M. Sc. Thesis, Science and Research Campus of Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Google Scholar

29.

A Yazdani , GH Assadi . 1989. Clitostethus arcuatus Rossi (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) a predator of whitefly and mite on pomegranate trees in Shiraz. Proceedings of 9th Iranian Plant Protection Congress 9–14 September, Mashhad Iran pp. 65. Google Scholar

30.

H Ziegler . 1993. First record of Clitostethus arcuatus for the German region. Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 37(1): 67–68. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Z. Tavadjoh, H. Hamzehzarghani, H. Alemansoor, J. Khalghani, and A. Vikram "Biology and Feeding Behaviour of Ladybird, Clitostethus arcuatus, the Predator of the Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae, in Fars Province, Iran," Journal of Insect Science 10(120), 1-12, (1 July 2010). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.12001
Received: 8 November 2008; Accepted: 1 May 2009; Published: 1 July 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top