Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2010 Selectivity of Pesticides used in Integrated Apple Production to the Lacewing, Chrysoperla externa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This research aimed to assess the toxicity of the pesticides abamectin 18 CE (0.02 g a.i. L-1), carbaryl 480 SC (1.73 g a.i. L-1), sulfur 800 GrDA (4.8 g a.i. L-1), fenitrothion 500 CE (0.75 g a.i. L-1), methidathion 400 CE (0.4 g a.i. L-1), and trichlorfon 500 SC (1.5 g a.i. L-1) as applied in integrated apple production in Brazil on the survival, oviposition capacity, and egg viability of the lacewing, Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. An attempt was made to study morphological changes caused by some of these chemicals, by means of ultrastructural analysis, using a scanning electronic microscope. Carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion caused 100% adult mortality for both populations, avoiding evaluation of pesticides' effects on predator reproductive parameters. Abamectin and sulfur also affected the survival of these individuals with mortality rates of 10% and 6.7%, respectively, for adults from Bento Gonçalves, and were harmless to those from Vacaria at the end of evaluation. Trichlorfon was also harmless to adults from both populations. No compound reduced oviposition capacity. C. externa from Vacaria presented higher reproductive potential than those from Bento Gonçalves. In relation to egg viability, sulfur was the most damaging compound to both populations of C. externa. Ultrastructural analyses showed morphological changes in the micropyle and the chorion of eggs laid by C. externa treated with either abamectin or sulfur. The treatment may have influenced the fertilization of C. externa eggs and embryonic development. Sulfur was responsible for malformations in the end region of the abdomen and genitals of treated females. When applied to adults, abamectin, sulfur, and trichlorfon were harmless, while carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion were harmful, according to the IOBC classification.

Introduction

The apple tree was introduced to Brazil in the 1960s in Fraiburgo, Santa Catarina. Since this crop was introduced in the country, farmers have faced attacks by several pests, which cause the loss of up to 100% of the harvest (Ribeiro 1999). Currently the apple tree is considered the most important fructiferous tree of temperate climate cultivated in the country; it has great significance in the domestic market and for exports as well (Silva et al. 2007).

Despite its recent cultivation in Brazilian lands, the national pomiculture is not only supplying the domestic market, but is also establishing itself gradually in international trade and European markets. In 2007, Brazil exported about 95,000 tons of apples to the European Union, with Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul as the most productive states, accounting for about 96% of the Brazilian production of this fruit (Agrianual 2008).

However, the imposed exigencies by this and other consuming markets have forced Brazilian producers to adapt to new methods of fruit production, in other words, integrated production. This system permits the production of better-quality fruits, the reduction in pesticide-use, and the possibility of tracking the final product. In integrated production, there are great efforts to control pests by increasing natural factors of mortality using biological agents such as parasitoids, predators, and entomopathogens, with the focus on predators that are able to consume great quantities of prey.

Among the predators, insects belonging to the family Chrysopidae have been considered voracious organisms with strong adaptability to different agroecosystems (Senior and McEwen 2001; Medina et al. 2003; Athan et al. 2004) and are widely distributed throughout the American continents, occurring from the southeast of the United States to the southern region of South America (Albuquerque et al. 1994). Past research has demonstrated that Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) are effective predators of mites on apples (Miszczak and Niemczyk 1978). In Brazil, C. externa is one of the most common species of green lacewings found in agricultural crops including the apple tree (Freitas and Penny 2001). C. externa feed on harmful arthropodpests of the apple tree, such as the woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum, the green citrus aphid Aphis citricola, the San Jose scale Quadraspidiotus perniciosus, and the European red mite Panonychus ulmi (Ribeiro 1999).

In this context, the use of selective pesticides, which control pests without affecting the populations of natural enemies in a negative way, constitute an important strategy in the integrated management of pests (Moura and Rocha 2006). It is important to identify and develop selective products and to determine the factors that affect behavior, development, and reproduction of beneficial organisms in a way that can be used in conjunction with biological methods of pest control in the apple tree crop.

The objective of this work was to assess the effects of certain pesticides used in integrated apple production in Brazil on the survival and reproduction of adults of C. externa, collected in commercial apple orchards in the towns of Bento Gonçalves (29° 10′ 29″ S; 51° 31′ 19″ W) and Vacaria (28° 30′ 44″ S; 50° 56′ 02″ W), both in Rio Grande do Sul, as well as studying possible morphological changes of C. externa eggs caused by these chemical agents via ultrastructural analysis using electronic scanning microscopy.

Materials and Methods

The rearing and maintenance of both populations of C. externa was done in a climatic room, at 25 ± 2° C, 70 ± 10% RH, and a photoperiod of 12:12 L:D. Following the techniques described by Auad et al. (2001) they were fed UV-killed eggs of Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Pesticides

Commercial formulations of abamectin 18 CE (0.02 g a.i. L-1), carbaryl 480 SC (1.73 g a.i. L-1), sulfur 800 GrDA (4.8 g a.i. L-1), fenitrothion 500 CE (0.75 g a.i. L-1), methidathion 400 CE (0.4 g a.i. L-1), and trichlorfon 500 SC (1.5 g a.i. L-1), recommended for use in integrated apple production in Brazil, were used in the bioassays with adults of C. externa. The dosage used was the manufacturer's highest recommended rate for controlling pests and diseases in apple trees. Distilled water was used as the control. The application of the evaluated compounds and distilled water over the insects was made using a Potter's tower (Burkard Scientific Ltd.,  www.burkard.co.uk) regulated at 15 lb pol-2, ensuring the application of 1.65 to 1.89 mg cm-2 of aqueous pesticide solution, according to methodology suggested by IOBC (Sterk et al. 1999; van de Veire et al. 2002).

Bioassays

Fifteen pairs (each pair constituted by one male and one female) of C. externa from each population, with ages from 0 to 24 h obtained from rearing and selected for treatment were anesthetized with CO2 for one min, and then pesticides and distilled water were applied immediately. Although adult male and female C. externa are similar in overall size and appearance, they were sexed by looking closely at the ventral surface of the tip of the abdomen using a stereoscopic microscope (40x) as described by Reddy (2002) and Reddy et al. (2004). Males have a small rounded capsule flanked by two small projections, while females have an oval area bounding a longitudinal slit.

After application of pesticides and distilled water, each pair was transferred to a PVC cage (7.5 cm diameter × 8 cm) covered internally with white filter paper, closed in the superior edge with organza type cloth, supported in a plastic tray (40 cm long × 20 cm wide × 10 cm high), and fed every three days with brewer's yeast and honey in the proportion of 1:1 (v/v). The cages were kept in a climatic room, at 25 ± 2° C, 70 ± 10% RH, and a photoperiod of 12:12 L:D. The evaluations took place at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after application with the goal of determining the mortality rate of the treated C. externa.

Six pairs of C. externa from each of the studied populations by treatment among the fifteen pairs that received pesticide application were used for the evaluation of effects of the compounds on the reproduction of this species. The evaluations began three days after the applications and continued twice a day with 12 hour intervals until the start of oviposition.

Four consecutive weeks after the start of the oviposition, the number of eggs deposited was counted at three-day intervals. Ninety-six eggs (by treatment) were separated into microtitration plate compartments using a camel hair brush. The plates were closed with a PVC film and kept under controlled conditions until the eggs hatched, when egg viability was evaluated. The oviposition capacity and egg viability of treated C. externa pairs were evaluated.

For the evaluation of adult mortality rate, a fully randomized experimental design in a 2 × 7 (two populations of C. externa × seven treatments) factorial scheme was used. Five replicates were used, with the experimental plot constituted by three pairs of C. externa. For the evaluation of the effects of the compounds on oviposition capacity and egg viability, a fully randomized experimental design with a 2 × 4 factorial scheme (two populations × four treatments) was used. For the oviposition evaluation, six replicates were used, and each plot was constituted by a C. externa couple; while in the evaluation of egg viability, eight replicates were used, and the experimental plot was composed of 12 eggs.

Pesticides classification

The mortality rate of treated adults was corrected by the Abbott's formula (Abbott 1925). The pesticides were then classified based on the reduction of beneficial capacity and mortality caused to the predator using Equation 1, proposed by Vogt (1992).

e01_01.gif
where:
e01a_01.gif
e01b_01.gif
According to recommendations of IOBC, the evaluated pesticides were organized in four toxicological classes (Sterk et al. 1999; van de Veire et al. 2002): class 1 = harmless (E < 30%), class 2 = slightly harmful (30% ≤ E ≤ 80%), class 3 = moderately harmful (80% < E ≤ 99%), and class 4 = harmful (E > 99%).

Statistical analysis

The obtained data in the bioassays with C. externa adults were submitted to analysis of variance using a two-way ANOVA, and the data referring to the number of eggs deposited by female C. externa and to the eggs' viability followed a split spot arrangement. The means of the different treatments were compared using the Scott-Knott clustering test (Scott and Knott 1974) at 5% significance when the F-test was significant using the statistical software, SAS (SAS Institute 2001).

The mortality data obtained from the bioassays with C. externa adults were angular-transformed (arcsine √x/100 transformation) before processing variance analysis. Data about amount of eggs laid per female were transformed to √x+1.

Data referring to the oviposition from females treated with pesticides as well as distilled water (control) were subjected to a model analysis using the software R (R Development Core Team 2006). GLM mode (Generalized Linear Models) with negative binomial distribution of error (logarithmic linkage function) for the over dispersion correction was applied for the output variable of oviposition (Crawley 2002). The following input variables were used to fit the model: C. externa populations, time (in days) after oviposition beginning, and treatments. Residual analyses with envelope approach generating probability distribution graphs of Normal (Gauss), Poisson, Binomial, and Negative Binomial (Pascal) were performed to verify how the data fit the models (Paula 2004). The best fitting model choice to oviposition data collected were the graphs plotted by the envelope approach and the AIC index (Akaike Information Criteria) (Akaike 1974; apud Paula 2004), as well as in the relationship between the deviance and degrees of freedom of the residue.

After the choice of the model, the necessary parameters estimates were calculated (Table 1) allowing the oviposition equations to be constructed for both C. externa populations and the evaluated treatments. Then, a program was developed to adjust several possibilities of the oviposition predator with all the equations being based on the general one (Equation 2) that follows. This program was implemented through the R software (R Development Core Team 2006).

e02_01.gif
where:
e02a_01.gif
e02b_01.gif
As an example, for the equation that gives female oviposition of C. externa from Bento Gonçalves treated with distilled water (control), the input variables Population, Treat2, Treat3, and Treat4 must have a value of 0.

Table 1.

Parameter estimates used to calculate the equations leading to the oviposition model of Chrysoperla externa for the populations of Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria in relation to the applied pesticides.

t01_01.gif

Ultrastructural analysis of C. externa eggs

Eggs laid by C. externa from both populations, treated with abamectin or sulfur, as well as distilled water (control), were prepared for later studies under scanning electronic microscopy, given the fact that these pesticides reduced viability rates through evaluation. Twenty newly laid eggs were used per treatment; they were transferred to plastic containers (Eppendorf,  www.eppendorf.com) with capacities of 2.0 ml and subjected to a protocol for biological sampling preparation, according to the laboratory's routine techniques described by Borém et al. (2008). Then, the samples were studied under a scanning electronic microscope (LEO Evo40 XVP).

Results

Six hours after the application of the pesticides, no compound had caused the death of any C. externa. However, 12 hours after application of carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion significant mortality was observed in adults from both populations, and this situation remained unchanged until the last evaluation (120 hours after the beginning of the bioassay) when these compounds had caused the death of 100% of the individuals. Sulfur and abamectin also caused mortality of 6.7% and 10%, respectively, in adults from the Bento Gonçalves population until the end of the evaluations and were innocuous to those from Vacaria. Trichlorfon was harmless to adults of both populations, and trichlorfon and sulfur did not change the mortality pattern of any population throughout evaluation process (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Oviposition estimates of Chrysoperla externa females from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, in function of pesticides application. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.eps

Oviposition capacity of surviving C. externa treated with trichlorfon, sulfur, or abamectin was not reduced by these compounds in either of the studied populations. However, females from Bento Gonçalves treated with sulfur or abamectin showed similar variations in the mean amount of laid eggs throughout the evaluation period. Females from Vacaria had similar variations when treated with trichlorfon or sulfur (Table 3).

It was also verified that the peak of oviposition for all treatments happened near the 15th day after the beginning of oviposition, regardless of the population. The mean amount of eggs varied from 101.5 to 120.2 for females from Bento Gonçalves and from 124.8 to 142.8 for females from Vacaria, with nearly 40 eggs each day.

Oviposition capacity of C. externa was reduced for both populations. In all evaluated treatments from the 27th day of oviposition, oviposition capacity varied from 47.5 to 63.0 eggs per female for the Bento Gonçalves population, and from 47.8 to 60.7 for the Vacaria population (Table 3).

Table 2.

Accumulated mortality (± SE1) of Chrysoperla externa adults from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, Rio Grande do Sul — Brazil, until 120 hours after application of the pesticides2,3.

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Number (± SE1) of eggs laid by Chrysoperla externa from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, Rio Grande do Sul — Brazil, treated with pesticides, throughout the 27 days of oviposition2,3.

t03_01.gif

Table 4.

Viability (%) (± SE1) of eggs laid by Chrysoperla externa from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil, treated with pesticides, throughout 27 days of oviposition2.

t04_01.gif

Table 5.

Effect of six different pesticides applied on Chrysoperla externa from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, in relation to adult mortality, oviposition capacity and viability of eggs from surviving females, total effect (E%) and toxicity classification.

t05_01.gif

Analysis of the data to develop a model that fit the obtained data and generation of equations that aim to predict C. externa oviposition from both studied populations evidenced that negative binomial (Pascal) was the best fit distribution with an AIC of 4175.1 and ratio between deviance and degrees of freedom of the residue equal to 443.55/425 (the result is 1.04), considered adequate by the residue analysis.

Oviposition modeling (Figure 1) showed that trichlorfon, followed by abamectin, were the most harmful compounds. These compounds affected oviposition of C. externa regardless of the origin of the studied C. externa population. Sulfur allowed the most oviposition with the mean varying around 50 to 100 eggs every three days for females from Bento Gonçalves and around 56 to 120 eggs for females from Vacaria. Oviposition behavior for females treated with the different pesticides was similar for both populations.

Figure 2.

Oviposition estimates of Chrysoperla externa females from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria, subjected to distilled water (control), trichlorfon, sulfur, or abamectin application. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.eps

It was also observed that the C. externa oviposition estimates for each of the tested pesticides, and the control showed greater oviposition capacity for females from Vacaria. This was true for both obtained and predicted values (Figure 2).

Nevertheless, there was a trend that the mean amount of C. externa eggs laid, irrespective of the pesticide used, was equal at the end of the oviposition period for both populations based on the prediction made by the adjusted model (Figures 1 and 2).

As for egg viability, it was observed that sulfur was the most damaging to both C. externa populations. For C. externa from Bento Gonçalves, oviposition was reduced in every single evaluation except for the first. Changes in hatching eggs caused by sulfur were also observed through the evaluations varying from 50% to 82% for C. externa from Bento Gonçalves and from 73% to 92% for C. externa from Vacaria (Table 4).

Figure 3.

External morphology of the chorion and micropyle of Chrysoperla externa eggs from Bento Gonçalves, treated with distilled water (a), abamectin (b), or sulfur (c). High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.eps

Abamectin also negatively affected this biological parameter but just on the 18th, 21st, and 24th day after oviposition began for C. externa from Bento Gonçalves and on the first and second evaluations performed three and six days after oviposition began for the Vacaria population. In the other evaluations no differences were observed between abamectin and the control. Throughout the performed evaluations, no changes were verified in egg viability laid by C. externa treated with abamectin, regardless of the population (Table 4).

Figure 4.

External surface of the chorion of Chrysoperla externa eggs from Bento Gonçalves, treated with distilled water (a), abamectin (b), or sulfur (c). High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.eps

Trichlorfon showed to be innocuous to C. externa, causing no reduction in viability of the eggs laid by treated females irrespective of the day of evaluation and irrespective of the studied population. Exceptions occurred in evaluations performed three and six days after the beginning of oviposition for C. externa from Vacaria when this pesticide provided egg viability of 86.5% and 85.4%, respectively (Table 4).

Based on the mortality caused by the compounds tested on C. externa from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria and its effects on the reproductive capacity and egg viability (Tables 2, 3, and 4), trichlorfon, sulfur, and abamectin were classified as harmless (class 1), while carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion were classified as harmful (class 4) for both of the studied populations (Table 5).

Figure 5.

External morphology of the chorion and micropyle of Chrysoperla externa eggs from Vacaria, treated with distilled water (a), abamectin (b), or sulfur (c). High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.eps

Ultrastructural analysis of C. externa eggs from both populations treated with sulfur or abamectin, which negatively affected egg viability, showed that these compounds changed the chorion and micropyle morphology of the eggs compared to eggs from females treated with distilled water (Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6). The malformation occurrence frequencies in the samples observed under a scanning electron microscope were about 67% for eggs of C. externa treated with sulfur and nearly 50% for eggs laid by females treated with abamectin.

Figure 6.

External surface of the chorion of Chrysoperla externa eggs from Vacaria, treated with distilled water (a), abamectin (b), or sulfur (c). High quality figures are available online.

f06_01.eps

It was also verified that some females of C. externa from both populations treated with sulfur showed malformations in the distal region of the abdomen and genitalia with the presence of dark, unidentified material (Figure 7).

Discussion

The results for abamectin in the present research are similar to the outcome of Godoy et al. (2004), who also observed no significant differences in mortality rates between this compound and the control samples of C. externa.

The safety of sulfur on adult C. externa is related to the innate tolerance of this predator to acaricides and fungicides containing sulfur, since according Croft (1990), these compounds are considered selective to natural enemies.

Figure 7.

Chrysoperla externa female presenting deformations in the distal region of the abdomen and genitalia caused by the application of the fungicide sulfur (a); affected region in detail (b). High quality figures are available online.

f07_01.eps

Trichlorfon was observed to be innocuous to adult C. externa. This is possibly due to its inability to penetrate C. externa's integument, as also related by Croft (1990) to Chrysoperla cornea. However, that author also commented that C. externa has developed low-level resistance to a wide range of conventional insecticides, including several organophosphates, carbamates, and some pyrethroids, and C. externa has widely adapted to the pesticide regimes used on apple trees. Detoxification factors can also provide selectivity to adults of Chrysoperla spp., as related to phosmet.

The results obtained in our research with carbaryl were also obtained by Wilkinson et al. (1975) and Güven and Göven (2005) for adults of C. cornea that resulted in 100% mortality, classifying carbaryl as harmful to this Chrysoperla species.

Results obtained in this study for carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion, which caused 100% mortality, confirmed results achieved by Grafton-Cardwell and Hoy (1985), Singh and Varma (1986), and Mizell III and Schiffhauer (1990), who observed high susceptibility of C. cornea to carbamates and organophosphates. This shows the high toxicity of these pesticides to adults of several Chysoperla species, which may restrict its use in both integrated pest management programs and integrated Brazilian apple production.

Studies conducted by Vogt et al. (2001) and Bozsik et al. (2002) with C. cornea evidenced that carbaryl and malaoxon showed high inhibitory capacity on the acetylcolinesterase enzyme in this species, which also occurred in the present study with carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion. The authors describe that acetylcolinesterase activity prediction appears to be an important tool for measuring differences either in susceptibility or tolerance of the species or in populations of a common enemy species in relation to potential side effects of a pesticide to the environment.

As for the reproductive capability of treated C. externa females, it was verified that the highest oviposition values achieved in this study were similar to those obtained by Ru et al. (1975) in studies about the biology of C. externa. It is believed that the Vacaria population presents greater reproductive potential when compared to the population from Bento Gonçalves, which must be considered when making use of C. externa in integrated pest management programs and in integrated apple production in southern Brazil. Probably the C. externa population from Vacaria is more fit because it has been regularly exposed to the evaluated pesticides before being tested in the laboratory. This population may have developed more tolerance (or resistance) to these pesticides than the Bento Gonçalves population, which has not been exposed to pesticides and has not developed resistance.

C. externa oviposition estimates (Figure 1) were based on the evaluations performed up to 27 days after the beginning of oviposition (dashed vertical line); hence the values are obtained from the prediction given by the adjusted model. Future research should consider a wider oviposition period. For example, during six or seven weeks, since the studies of this species (Núñez 1988; Carvalho et al. 1998; Silva et al. 2004) have been evidencing that the oviposition period can reach up to 100 days depending on food given to adults. Some researchers have already shown the possibility of evaluating C. externa oviposition subjected to pesticide application through selectivity tests for up to 50 days (Bueno and Freitas 2004).

Viability reductions, as observed mostly in eggs from C. externa treated with sulfur, may be a side effect of this pesticide on oogenesis, possibly on trophocytes (sister-cells of the oocytes) and responsible for their nutrition. According to Chapman (1998), the trophocytes malformation or the absorption of contaminated proteins by these cells may result in lack of nutrients for embryos or changes in embryo development, leading to embryo death. In this way, pesticides must have affected such physiological events and caused a reduction in viability rates for treated eggs.

The obtained toxicity classification for sulfur in this research confirmed the research of Silva et al. (2006) for adult C. externa. Silva et al. (2006) considered sulfur harmless to C. externa with total effect (E) lower than 30%. This result also matches those of Hassan et al. (1983, 1987, 1994) for the species C. carnea.

Silva et al. (2006) classified chlorpyrifos as harmful (class 4); this was the same classification given to fenitrothion and methidathion in the present study. Fenitrothion and methidathion are pesticides of the same chemical group of chlorpyrifos (organophosphates), which demonstrates the high toxicity of these compounds to C. externa.

Research conducted by Hassan et al. (1983, 1987) with C. carnea on the toxicity classifications attributed to trichlorfon, carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion were the same classifications given to the same compounds in this study on C. externa. The methods used were identical.

The observed changes in the external surface of the chorion of eggs from females exposed to sulfur or abamectin residues suggests that the changes might have been induced by changes in the folicular cells responsible for the secretion of chorion layers, since shape modifications caused in the above mentioned cells are reflected in the chorion morphology (Chapman 1998). However, changes in the cells' constitution may also be responsible for modification in the chorion surface since the proteins synthesized by folicular cells behave as basic material to the chorion formation. These proteins also may affect the formation of aeropyle, micropyle, and other chorion pores.

It is believed that the abnormalities caused by sulfur and abamectin to both chorion and micropyle of eggs from treated C. externa may be responsible for the observed reduction of egg viability. According to Mazzini (1976) and Chapman (1998), alterations in any of the chorion layers may affect its permeability, and consequently, the loss of water, embryonic development, and egg viability. Still according to the same authors, abnormalities in cellular processes which are responsible for the micropyle formation may inhibit access for the sperm to the inner side of the egg and interfere in its fertilization and viability.

The causes of observed deformation at both the distal region of the abdomen and the genitalia of C. externa females from Bento Gonçalves and Vacaria treated with sulfur could not be explained by this research or found in scientific literature.

In conclusion, sulfur and abamectin are responsible for anomalies in the chorion and micropyle of C. externa eggs. Sulfur causes malformations in the genitalia of treated females. Sulfur, trichlorfon, and abamectin are harmless, whereas carbaryl, fenitrothion, and methidathion are harmful to adults of both studied populations, according to the IOBC toxicity classification.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the CNPq and FAPEMIG for the scholarships that allowed this research; Dr. Eduardo Alves and MSc. Eloísa Lopes, from the Department of Phytopathology, Federal University of Lavras, Brazil, for their great help with ultrastructural analysis; Dr. András Bozsik, from the Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Debrecen University, Hungary, and Dr. Massimo Mazzini, Department of Environmental Sciences, Tuscia University, Italy, for sending bibliographical material that helped in the results discussion; Brent F. Newby, B. S., Kansas State University, U.S.A., for the manuscript's careful revision in concern of the language; and two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on the early version of the manuscript.

Glossary

Abbreviation:

IOBC

International Organization for Biological Control

References

1.

WS Abbott . 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18(2): 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

Agrianual. 2008. Anuário da Agricultura Brasileira 2008, 1 a edição. Instituto FNP. Google Scholar

3.

H Akaike . 1974. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6): 716–722. Google Scholar

4.

GS Albuquerque , CA Tauber , MJ Tauber . 1994. Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Life history and potential for biological control in Central and South America. Biological Control 4(1): 8–13. Google Scholar

5.

R Athan , B Kaydan , MS Ozgokce . 2004. Feeding activity and life history characteristics of the generalist predator, Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at different prey densities. Journal of Pest Science 77(1): 17–21. Google Scholar

6.

AM Auad , S Freitas , LR Barbosa . 2001. Influencia de la dieta em la respuesta funcional de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentadas com Uroleucon ambrosiae (Thomas) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal ‘Plagas’ 27(4): 455–463. Google Scholar

7.

F Borém , E Marques , E Alves . 2008. Ultrastructural analysis of drying damage in parchment Arabica coffee endosperm cells. Biosystmes Engineering 99(1): 62–66. Google Scholar

8.

A Bozsik , F Francis , C Gaspar , E Haubrugr . 2002. Effect of some insecticides on acetylcholinesterase from beneficial insects: Coccinella septempunctata, Chrysoperla carnea and Forficula auricularia. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Universiteit te Gent 67(3): 671–677. Google Scholar

9.

AF Bueno , S Freitas . 2004. Effect of the insecticides abamectin and lufenuron on eggs and larvae of Chrysoperla externa under laboratory conditions. BioControl 49(3): 277– 283. Google Scholar

10.

CF Carvalho , B Souza , TM Santos . 1998. Predation capacity and reproduction potential of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) fed on Alabama argillacea (Hübner) eggs. Acta Zoologica Fennica 209(1): 83–86. Google Scholar

11.

RF Chapman . 1998. The insects - Structure and function , 4th edition. Cambridge University. Google Scholar

12.

M Crawley . 2002. Statistical computing- An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus , 1st edition. John Wiley. Google Scholar

13.

BA Croft . 1990. Arthropod biological control agents and pesticides , 1st edition. Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar

14.

S Freitas , ND Penny . 2001. The green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of Brazilian agro-ecosystems. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science 52(19): 245–395. Google Scholar

15.

MS Godoy , GA Carvalho , JC Moraes , LV Cosme , MM Goussain , CF Carvalho , AA Morais . 2004. Seletividade de seis inseticidas utilizados em citros a pupas e adultos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Neotropical Entomology 33(3): 359–364. Google Scholar

16.

EE Grafton-Cardwell , MA Hoy . 1985. Intraspecific variability in response to pesticides in the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Hilgardia 53(6): 1–32. Google Scholar

17.

B Güven , MA Göven . 2005. Side effects of insecticides used in cotton and vineyard areas of Aegean Region of Turkey on the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under semi field conditions. In: R Olszak , D Gajek , editors. Worging Group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms” Meeting 2005. pp. 3–4. IOBC/WPRS Press. Google Scholar

18.

SA Hassan , F Bigler , H Bogenschütz , E Boller , J Brun , JNM Calis , J Coremans-Pelseneer , C Duso , A Grove , U Heimbach , N Helyer , H Hokkanen , GB Lewis , F Mansour , L Moreth , L Polgar , L Samsoe-Petersen , B Sauphanor , A Stäubli , G Sterk , A Vainio , M van de Veire , G Viggiani , H Vogt . 1994. Results of the sixth joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group «Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms». Entomophaga 39(1): 107–119. Google Scholar

19.

SA Hassan , R Albert , F Bigler , P Blaisinger , H Bogenschütz , E Boller , J Brun , P Chiverton , P Edwards , WD Englert , P Huang , C Inglesfield , E Naton , PA Oomen , WPJ Overmeer , W Rieckmann , L Samsoe-Petersen , A Stäubli , JJ Tuset , G Viggiani , G Vanwetswinkel . 1987. Results of the third joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms”. Journal of Applied Entomology 103(1): 92– 107. Google Scholar

20.

SA Hassan , F Bigler , H Bogenschütz , JU Brown , SI Firth , P Huang , MS Ledieu , E Naton , PA Oomen , WPJ Overmeer , W Rieckmann , L Samsoe-Petersen , G Viggiani , AQ van Zon . 1983. Results of the second joint pesticide testing programme by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group “Pesticides and Beneficial Arthropods”. Journal of Applied Entomology 95(2): 151–158. Google Scholar

21.

M Mazzini . 1976. Fine structure of the insect micropyle-III. Ultrastructure of the egg of Chrysopa carnea Steph. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 5(4/5): 273–278. Google Scholar

22.

P Medina , G Smagghe , F Budia , L Tiny , E Viñuela . 2003. Toxicity and absorption of azadirachtin, diflubenzuron, pyriproxyfen and tebufenozide after direct spray in predatory larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology 32(1): 196–203. Google Scholar

23.

M Miszczac , E Niemczyk . 1978. Green lacewing Chrysopa carnea Steph. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) as a predator of European mite (Panonycus ulmi Koch) on apple trees. Part II. The effectiveness of Chrysopa carnea larvae in control Panonychus ulmi Koch. Fruit Science Reports 5(2): 21–31. Google Scholar

24.

RF Mizell III , DE Schiffhauer . 1990. Effects of pesticides on pecan aphid predators Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Hippodamia convergens, Cycloneda sanguinea (L.), Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and Aphelinus perpallidus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83(5): 1806–1812. Google Scholar

25.

AP Moura , LCD Rocha . 2006. Seletivos e eficientes. Cultivar Hortaliças e Frutas 6(1): 6–8. Google Scholar

26.

E Núñez . 1988. Ciclo biológico y crianza de Chrysoperla externa y Ceraeochrysa cincta (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Revista Peruana de Entomologia 31(1): 76–82. Google Scholar

27.

GA Paula . 2004. Modelos de regressõo com apoio computacional, 1 a edição. Instituto de Matemática e Estatística — IME. Google Scholar

28.

R Development Core Team. 2006. R - A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.3.1 , 1st edition. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Google Scholar

29.

GVP Reddy . 2002. Plant volatiles mediate orientation and plant preference by the predator Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biological Control 25(1):49–55. Google Scholar

30.

GVP Reddy , E Tabone , MT Smith . 2004. Mediation of host selection and oviposition behavior in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella and its predator Chrysoperla carnea by chemical cues from cole crops. Biological Control 29(2): 270–277. Google Scholar

31.

LG Ribeiro . 1999. Principals pragas da macieira. In: JIS Bonetti , LG Ribeiro , Y Katsurayama , editors. Manual de identificação de doenças e pragas da macieira. pp. 97–149. EPAGRI. Google Scholar

32.

N Ru , WH Whitcomb , M Murphey , TC Carlysle . 1975. Biology of Chrysopa lanata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 68(2): 187–190. Google Scholar

33.

SAS Institute. 2001. SAS/STAT: Users guide , 1st edition. SAS Institute Inc. Google Scholar

34.

AJ Scott , MA Knott . 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30(3): 507–512. Google Scholar

35.

LJ Senior , PK McEwen . 2001. The use of lacewings in biological control. In: PK McEwen , TR New , AE Whittington , editors. Lacewings in the crop environment. pp. 296–302. Cambridge University. Google Scholar

36.

SJN Silva , PZ Schuch , CR Bernardi , MH Vainstein , A Jablonski , RJ Bender . 2007. Patulin in food: State-of-the-art and analytical trends. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 29(2): 406–413. Google Scholar

37.

RA Silva , GA Carvalho , CF Carvalho , PR Reis , B Souza , AMAR Pereira . 2006. Ação de produtos fitossanitários utilizados em cafeeiros sobre pupas e adultos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ciência Rural 36(1): 8–14. Google Scholar

38.

CG Silva , AM Auad , B Souza , CF Carvalho , JP Bonani , 2004. Aspectos biológicos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889) biótipo B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) criada em trâs hospedeiros. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 28(2): 243–250. Google Scholar

39.

PP Singh , GC Varma . 1986. Comparative toxicities of some insecticides to Chrysoperla carnea (Chrysopidae: Neuroptera) and Trichogramma brasiliensis (Trichogrammatidae: Hymenoptera), two arthropod natural enemies of cotton pests. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 15(1): 23–30. Google Scholar

40.

G Sterk , SA Hassan , M Baillod , F Bakker , F Bigler , S Blümel , H Bogenschütz , E Boller , B Bromand , J Brun , JNM Callis , J CoremansPelseneer , C Duso , A Garrido , A Grove , U Heimbach , H Hokkanen , J Jacas , G Lewis , L Moreth , L Polgar , L Roversti , L SamsoePetersen , B Sauphanor , L Schaub , A Stäubli , JJ Tuset , A Vainio , M van de Veire , G Viggiani , E Vinuela , H Vogt . 1999. Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRSWorking Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’. BioControl 44(1): 99–117. Google Scholar

41.

M van de Veire , G Sterk , M van der Staaij , PMJ Ramakers , L Tirry . 2002. Sequential testing scheme for the assessment of the sideeffects of plant protection products on the predatory bug Orius laevigatus. BioControl 47(1): 101–113. Google Scholar

42.

H Vogt , E Viñuela , A Bozsik , A Hilbeck , F Bigler . 2001. Interactions with plant management strategies. In: PK McEwen , TR New , AE Whittington , editors. Lacewings in the crop environment. pp. 357–379. Cambridge University. Google Scholar

43.

H Vogt . 1992. Untersuchugen zu Nebenwirkungen von Insektiziden und Acariziden auf Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwtenschappen Reijksuniversiteit te Gent 57(2b): 559–567. Google Scholar

44.

JD Wilkinson , KD Biever , CM Ignoffo . 1975. Contact toxicity of some chemical and biological pesticides to several insect parasitoids and predators. Entomophaga 20(1): 113–120. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Alexandre Pinho Moura, Geraldo Andrade Carvalho, Valéria Fonseca Moscardini, Olinto Lasmar, Denise Tourino Rezende, and Márcio Candeias Marques "Selectivity of Pesticides used in Integrated Apple Production to the Lacewing, Chrysoperla externa," Journal of Insect Science 10(121), 1-20, (1 July 2010). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.12101
Received: 22 October 2008; Accepted: 1 April 2009; Published: 1 July 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
20 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top