Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 August 2010 A Comparison of Fitness Characters of Two Host Plant-Based Congeneric Species of the Banana Aphid, Pentalonia Nigronervosa and P. Caladii
Parna Bhadra, B. K. Agarwala
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Aphids and other phytophagous insects often show intra-specific variations in relation to host plant utilization. In several instances, intra-species variations lead to host-plant specialization. These are considered to be important source of speciation. In a recent study (Foottit RG et al. 2010. Zootaxa 2358: 25–38) two forms of the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa f typica Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae) from banana hosts and P. nigronervosa f. caladii van der Goot collected from Zingiberaceae and Araceae respectively were described as separate species, P. nigronervosa Coquerel and P. caladii van der Goot, based on morphological and molecular differences. A study was undertaken to examine the ecological and biological characters in asexual wingless morphs of the two forms of P. nigronervosa sensu lat. using taro (Araceae) and banana (Musaceae) as host plants. The results showed consistent differences between the two forms. In biological characters, the apterous morphs off. caladii from taro host plants were found to be significantly more fecund, showed a higher net reproductive rate, longer reproductive duration, and their adults lived longer than the f. typica aphids from banana host plants. In ecological characters, f. caladii aphids formed bigger colonies and in significantly less time on taro plants in comparison to f. typica aphids which formed smaller colonies in significantly more time on banana plants. Reciprocal transfer of the two forms of P. nigronervosa aphids between their host plant species lowered performance on the transferred host plants. These results confirmed that P. nigronervosa f. typica from banana hosts and P. nigronervosa f. caladii from taro hosts are indeed two different species in relation to host plant utilization and suggested that the observed differences in their fitness characters represented distinct genotypes.

Introduction

The majority of the phytophagous insects live in heterogeneous environments that consist of varied host plants, climate and biological conditions. As a result, these insects often show variations in morphological, biological and ecological attributes of their populations (Singh and Cunningham 1981; Helden et al. 1984; Powell et al. 2006). Often this can cause problems in the accurate separation of taxa at species and infra-species categories (Hille Ris Lambers 1966; Miyazaki 1987; Raychaudhuri 1980; Agarwala and Ghosh 1985). Six distinct host-related populations of Aulacorthum solani (Damsteegt and Voegtlin 1990), three populations of Lipaphis pseudobrassicae (Agarwala et al. 2009) and four distinct hostspecialized populations of Aphis gossypii (Agarwala and Das 2007) were identified based on variations in morphology and ecological performance. Gorur et al. (2005) recorded genotypic variability and phenotypic plasticity in Aphis fabae when reared on preferred host as well as on novel host. Genotypic variability and phenotypic plasticity in host plant choice behavior of A. fabae were also recorded when tested on field host plant and novel host plant (Gorur et al. 2007).

In this study the fitness of populations of the banana aphid, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Hemiptera: Aphididae), collected from two different host plant species, the banana, Musa paradisiaca L. var. champa (Zingiberales: Musaceae) and taro, Colocasia esculenta antiquorum L. (Arales: Araceae) were examined in terms of their ecological and biological characters. Worldwide, P. nigronervosa is recognized due to its vector populations on banana plants (Rajan 1981; Hu et al. 1996; Thinbhuvanmala et al. 2005; Robson et al. 2007). This aphid species is known to occur in two morphs from this part of the world, an apterous parthenogenetic viviparous female morph, and an alate parthenogenetic viviparous female morph (Raychaudhuri 1980; Blackman and Eastop 1984; Lorterio 1993). Banana and taro plants occur in the wild as well as in cultivation in large parts of east and north-east India and, therefore, are interspersed and offer P. nigronervosa populations opportunities to adapt to these hosts. Eastop (1966) reported two forms of P. nigronervosa on the basis of morphological differences in the alate viviparous morph from Australia and other parts of southern hemisphere, (i) P. nigronervosa f. caladii van der Goot from taro and (ii) P. nigronervosa f. typica from banana. Siddappaji and Reddy (1972) reported that the aphids from banana plants in parts of southern India belonged to the form typica Eastop, and those infesting cardamom and taro plants belonged to the form caladii. These host plant species provided different food environments for colonisation by aphids. Banana plants are infested by aphids at the bases of the uppermost cigar-shaped leaves and in the spathe, whereas taro plants are infested on the stem near the root and seldom at the bases of broad open leaves. In the environment of north-east India, distinctive features of the two host plant species provided ideal conditions for sympatric populations of P. nigronervosa.

The occurrence of two distinct forms of P. nigronervosa in the same habitat suggests that these insects might differ in their developmental and reproductive fitness in different host environments. No information was available about the evaluation of fitness characters in terms of biological and ecological performance of these aphids on taro and banana host plants (Eastop 1966; Rao and Naidu 1973; Foottit et al. 2010). In a recent study the two forms of the banana aphid, f. typica from banana hosts and f. caladii from hosts of Zingiberaceae and Araceae were described as separate species, P. nigronervosa and P. caladii, respectively, based on large and consistent differences in morphometry and molecular analysis (Foottit et al. 2010). Assuming the results of Foottit et al. (2010) would also be true for biological and ecological characters of the two species, a study was undertaken in laboratory reared clones of Pentalonia aphids from M. paradisiaca var. champa (banana host) and C. esculenta antiquorum (taro host). Biological characters including development and reproduction, and ecological characters including maximum population size, and growth rate of the clonal populations of P. nigronervosa from banana and taro hosts were investigated. Colonization success of aphids of respective clones from their field hosts to laboratory hosts were also tested in reciprocal host transfer experiment. The objective of this study was to record population and developmental parameters of the two species of Pentalonia described by Foottit et al. (2010) that could have bearings on the fitness of these aphids on their respective host plants and provide data that could test their identity as distinct species.

Materials and Methods

Insects

Apterous parthenogenetic viviparous aphids of P. nigronervosa and P. caladii were collected from banana and taro plants, respectively, found in the wild at five different locations, separated by about 2000 m distance from each other, in and around Agartala, north-east India (23.50°N latitude and 91.25°E longitude). These aphids were used to raise ten stock cultures, five each of P. nigronervosa on banana and P. caladii on taro host plants, under greenhouse conditions (24 ± 1° C temperature and 16:8 L:D photoperiod).

Host plants of the two species in early vegetative stage were maintained individually in clay or plastic pots and these were held in water trays on benches illuminated with photo-synthetically active radiation lamps. Individual plants, two from each location, were infected with a single fourth instar apterus aphid collected from their respective locations in the fields. These were allowed to grow, reproduce and increase in number. Aphid cultures on individual potted plants were confined in nylon net cages in segregated locations. This was repeated ten times for each plant species. All aphids produced from a single mother on each of the plants by this practice consisted of same genotype and, thus, constituted a clone. Fourth instar aphids produced of the same genotype of a grandmother on a plant species were used in experiments. Individual aphids, chosen randomly from banana and taro clones in the greenhouse, were placed on the apical part of the 16–20 day old pot-grown saplings at the early vegetative stage in a rearing cabinet (temperature: 24 ± 1° C; 65% RH and 16:8 L:D photoperiod). Thus, several sister clones of the same genetic lineage of the two aphid species were raised on their two host plant species. Aphid-infected individual plants were individually caged to avoid any contamination during the experiment. Observations were made at frequent intervals until each clone attained its maximum increase in population and then started to decline. Sister clones were monitored individually several times in a day. Alate females were discarded. Aphids from these clones representing two different genotypes from the two host plant species were used to measure differences in their ecological and biological characters. For determining the mean relative growth rate, parthenogenetic females of both the aphid species from their clones were placed individually in leaf cages (Blackman 1987) to obtain parthenogenetic descendents. Individual aphids were monitored for weight at birth (<12h) and at the final molt during their development.

Population parameters

Maximum population size and growth rate for the two aphid species were determined from their respective host plant species. Twenty replicates were used in each study.

Maximum population size (Nt ) of a clone achieved on a potted plant and the time taken to reach the Nt (T) were used to compare any difference in the performance of P. nigronervosa and P. caladii on their respective host plants.

Population growth rate (GR), the increase in number of aphids of a clone per day per plant in the rising phase of population increase, was calculated by the formula

e01_01.gif
where Nt is the number of aphids present at the maximum count of the population on a plant, No is the number of aphids initially released on a potted plant, and Δt is the difference of time between N0 and Nt (Odum 1971).

Developmental parameters

Biological characters including developmental time (DT), generation time (GT), reproductive duration (RD), fecundity (F) and adult longevity (AL) were recorded for individual aphids of the two P. nigronervosa genotypes.

For this purpose individual third or fourth stadium nymphs were each placed on a detached leaf in a leaf cage (Blackman 1987) in a temperature controlled cabinet at 24±1° C. This was repeated ten times for aphids from the two host species. Nymphs were allowed to become apterous adults, to reproduce in the first 24 hours and then the adults were removed. Only one new born aphid of an adult was retained and the rest removed. Its weight was recorded and allowed to develop to the final molt when it was weighed again and observed for the durations of prereproduction, reproduction and postreproduction. The number of nymphs born to individual aphids was counted and all but one was removed. The remaining aphid was allowed to develop into second generation. Leaves were changed every 24 h to maintain the vigor of the experimental culture. As a result of this procedure, birth weight (BW) of nymphs within 12h of laying by a mother aphid, adult weight at the final molt (AW), developmental time from the birth of a nymph to its final molt, generation time from the birth of a nymph to the time of onset of reproduction by this nymph, reproductive duration from the birth of the first nymph to the last nymph by an apterous female, fecundity and adult longevity were recorded.

The mean relative growth rate (MRGR), a measure for assessing the performance of different clones of a species under different environmental conditions (Radford 1967), was determined following the method of Watt and Hales (1996):

e02_01.gif
and expressed as mg increase in weight of aphids born per mg of the mother aphid per day.

Net reproductive rate (R0), the multiplication rate of an aphid in a clone per generation, was calculated using the equation (Krebs 1985),

e03_01.gif
where lx is the proportion of females surviving, and mx is the number of female offspring born per female during its reproductive time.

Intrinsic rate of increase (Rmax ), a measure of rate of increase of a population under controlled conditions, was calculated using the formula,

e04_01.gif
where R0 is the net reproductive rate and G is the mean length of a generation determined by the equation (Krebs 1985),
e05_01.gif

Host transfer experiment

Aphids of the two species were subjected to reciprocal transfer of hosts to record the colonization success in a new food environment. Individual nymphs, 0–12 h old, were released at the apical most part of potted plants of similar age of field hosts (control) and laboratory hosts (treatments). These aphids were allowed to settle and produce nymphs for the second generation. If successful, a third generation was produced. Two treatments were set up simultaneously using parental clones of P. nigronervosa and P. caladii from their respective host plants. In the first treatment, P. caladii aphids were transferred individually from the taro field host to the laboratory host, banana, and in the second treatment P. nigronervosa aphids were transferred from the banana field host to taro plants as the laboratory host. In both the treatments, performances of aphids on their respective field host plants were considered as the controls. In each case of host transfer, ten replicates were used to record the success rate of survival and reproduction by apterous viviparous aphids on a host plant leading to the establishment of a colony. Aphids that either failed to develop to the adult stage in the first generation or failed to produce second or third generation progeny were considered to be unsuccessful.

Data analysis

Data of the third generation aphids were used to compare results of population and developmental parameters. This was done to allow the aphids sufficient time for acclimatization to the laboratory rearing conditions. All weights in this study were taken using a Mettler microbalance ( www.met.com) sensitive to 2µg. Each of the population and developmental parameters that were measured from the wingless aphids of the two Pentalonia species were compared using the Student t test. Origin 7 ( www.originlab.com) was used for the analysis of data.

Results

Population parameters

Clones of P. nigronervosa and P. caladii showed significant differences in growth rates and maximum population size on their respective host plants. Time taken to attain the maximum population size also differed between the clones of the two aphid species from the two species of hosts. The P. caladii clones reared on taro plants showed a mean growth rate of 2.73 aphids/ day which was higher by approximately 3.14 times compared to the clones of P. nigronervosa reared on banana plants (0.87 aphids/ day; Figure 1a). The maximum population size of P. caladii clones on taro plants for was 341.89 aphids per plant which was 4.27 times higher than the mean maximum population size of P. nigronervosa clones on banana plants (80.10 aphids per plant; Figure 1b). However, the time taken by the clones of the two species of Pentalonia to achieve the maximum population size on their respective host plants did not show the same trend. Aphids of P. caladii clones on taro plants reached the asymptote in significantly less time of 29.20 days, which was lower by 68%, in comparison to the P. nigronervosa clones reared on banana plants (42.80 days; Figure 1c). Thus, P. nigronervosa clones on banana plants formed smaller colonies more slowly in comparison to P. caladii clones on taro plants which formed bigger colonies in less time (Figure 1d).

Developmental parameters

Apterous aphids of P. caladii and P. nigronervosa clones from taro and banana plants, respectively, showed significant differences in development time, generation time and fecundity and these were distinguishable in terms of their minimum and maximum values from the respective means (Table 1). The P. caladii aphids from taro plants took longer to complete development (development time: mean ± SEM = 10.05 ± 0.20 days) and to begin reproduction (i.e., generation time: mean ± SEM = 11.35 ± 0.25 days) than by the P. nigronervosa aphids on banana plants (development time: mean ± SEM = 8.25 ± 0.11 days; generation time: mean ± SEM = 9.45 ± 0.17 days). Between the two aphid species, individual aphids from the P. caladii clones from taro host showed longer reproductive duration (mean ± SEM = 13.50 ± 0.97days) and longer adult longevity (mean ± SEM = 16.25 ± 1.15 days) in comparison to aphids from the P. nigronervosa clones (mean ± SEM: reproductive duration = 9.60 ± 0.37 days; adult longevity = 12.85 ± 0.40 days). Aphids from the taro clones were 2.24 times more fecund (mean ± SEM = 24.50 ± 1.06 progeny per female) and showed higher net reproductive rate (mean ± SEM = 24.56 ± 0.90) than the aphids from the banana clones that showed significantly lower fecundity (mean ± SEM = 10.90 ± 0.38 progeny per female) and lower net reproductive rate (mean ± SEM = 10.71 ± 0.66). Intrinsic rate of increase and mean relative growth rate of P. nigronervosa and P. caladii aphids on the two plant species, however, did not show comparable differences (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Mean values of growth rate (GR) (a), maximum population size (Nt) (b), time to attain Nt (T) (c) and population trend (d) of Pentalonia caladii and P. nigronervosa determined on potted plants of taro and banana, respectively. High quality figures are available online.

F01_01.eps

Host transfer experiment

When transferred to banana plants, the colonization success rate of P. caladii aphids from taro plants (treatment I) declined from 40% in the first generation to 20% in third generation. In each of the three generations, 60% or more of the aphids transplanted from taro plants either did not survive to produce offspring or perished on the transferred host plant (Figure 2a). When aphids of P. nigronervosa aphids from banana host were transferred to taro host (treatment II), the colonization success rate was found to be 90% in the first generation and declined to 60% in the second and third generations. In both cases of host transfer, performance of aphids of the two Pentalonia species declined on the alternate host plant species in second and third generations after initial success in the first generation (Figure 2b).

Table 1.

Mean values of biological characters studied in caladii and typica phenotypes of Pentalonia nigronervosa from taro and banana host plants.

t01_01.gif

Discussion

This study has provided evidence that P. nigronervosa and P. caladii aphids show strong differences in their developmental and reproductive fitness in relation to banana and taro host plants, respectively, which supports the existence of two distinct lineages proposed by Foottit et al. (2010). Apterous viviparous morph of caladii from taro host plants were found to be significantly more fecund, showed higher net reproductive rate, longer reproductive duration, significantly longer development and generation times, and their adults lived longer than the P. nigronervosa aphids from banana host plants. In population parameters, P. caladii aphids on taro plants formed bigger colonies in significantly less time in comparison to P. nigronervosa aphids that formed smaller colonies more slowly on banana plants. Although the observed differences in population parameters of the two Pentalonia species are large on their respective host plants, these differences could be attributed, at least in part, to the differences in phenology of the two host plants which are quite different in terms of their relative sizes and growth rates. Thus, under field condition, aphids of the two congeneric species could show population growth in response to phenology of their respective host plants which might be different than that observed in the laboratory study (Agarwala and Datta, 1999). Nevertheless, large and consistent differences recorded in the performance of the two Pentalonia species on banana and taro hosts in the controlled environment of the laboratory are indicative of inherent differences in their development and growth ability. Biotic potential (Rmax ) of the two species on their respective host plants, as evident from the intrinsic rate of increase was, however, found to be similar (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Success of colonization by Pentalonia caladii and P. nigronervosa species of aphids through generations on their field hosts (control) and across host plants, (a) treatment I: P. caladii transfered to laboratory host banana, (b) treatment II: P. nigronervosa transfered to laboratory host taro. High quality figures are available online.

F02_01.eps

Results from host plant transfer experiment on reciprocal basis suggested that performance of both the species of Pentalonia considerably declined in successive generations on the alternate hosts in comparison to the control hosts and the decline was found to be more profound in P. caladii than in P. nigronervosa aphids. These results suggested that host plant-aphid interaction in the populations of Pentalonia has lead to the evolution of more than one species based on their fitness in the distinct environment of these two host plants and these represented different species as described by Foottit et al. (2010). However, the status of Pentalonia populations reported from Dieffenbachia spp. (Family, Araceae) (Blackman and Eastop 1984) remain to be ascertained for their true species status. The only other valid species known in the genus is P. gavarri Eastop described from alate viviparous morph collected in yellow traps from Philippines and north east Australia (Eastop 1967; Carver and Hales 1983). Subsequently, apterous viviparae of this species was described from west Malaysia infesting graminaceous hosts (Martin, 1987).

Both species of Pentalonia in this study are commonly known by their alate and apterous viviparous morphs and to reproduce by asexual means in the environment of northeast India and elsewhere in their distribution range of tropical and subtropical regions (Eastop, 1966; Miyazaki, 1971; Raychaudhuri, 1980; Robson et al. 2007; Foottit et al. 2010). The rare apterous oviparous morph of P. nigronervosa from Curcuma domestica Valeton (Zingiberaceae) recorded from the tropical plains of West Bengal, and also in neighbouring Nepal (Bhanotar and Ghosh, 1969; Blackman and Eastop, 1984) seem to suggest that these aphids are endowed with the genetic potential of producing sexual forms in warm climate similar to aphids of Greenideinae, several species of which are known to produce sexual morphs in the hot summer of India and Australia (Agarwala and Dixon, 1986; Dixon, 1998). In Japan, P. nigronervosa is reported from the southernmost parts, Okinawa, which is warmer compared to central and northern parts which have temperate climate (Miyazaki, 1971). With the application of modern practices of horticulture and agriculture, these plants, particularly banana, are now grown throughout the year, because of their economic importance; thereby the importance of seasonality of host plants appears to have less bearing on the life of aphids except for the influence of shorter a photo period and lower temperature that are known to provide necessary stimuli for the production of sexual morphs (Dixon, 1998). In the area of this study and elsewhere in the distribution range of Pentalonia species, necessary climatic stimuli to produce sexuparae are absent. Therefore, it appears reasonable to assume that these aphids, like some other aphid species, have been evolving in response to the host plant environment (Blackman and Spence, 1992; Gorur et al. 2005; Fenton et al. 2009).

A number of studies of insect herbivores have found significant intra-specific variation in characters associated with host plant utilization (Futuyama and Philippi 1987; Via 1990). It has been shown that intra-specific variation or differences in congeneric species of aphids can be due to either one or the combined action of genetic differences, effects of host plant species (Lowe 1973; Via 1991; Gorur et al. 2005) and/ or facultative endosymbionts (Tsuchida et al. 2006). The two species of Pentalonia tested in this study, showed large and consistent differences in fitness characters on their respective host plants. Such differences in response to host plants is suggestive of strong genotype (aphids)-environment (host plants) interactions indicating increased genetic variation. The hypothesis of sympatic speciation in phytophagous insects occurring via phenotypic host race formation has been gaining acceptance in recent years (Butlin 1995; Gorur 2000; Agarwala and Das 2007; Agarwala et al. 2007, 2009). The result of this study has contributed to our understanding as to how phenotypic plasticity facilitates speciation in aphids (Agarwala, 2007; Gorur et al. 2007) through host plant specialization (Fenton et al. 2009).

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged for the grant of a project on the biosystematics of insect diversity in north-east India.

References

1.

BK Agarwala , 2007. Phenotypic plasticity in aphids (Homoptera: Insecta): components of variations and causative factors. Current Science 93: 308–313. Google Scholar

2.

BK Agarwala , K Das . 2007. Host plant-based morphological, ecological and esterase variations in Aphis gossypii Glover populations (Homoptera: Aphididae). Entomon 32: 89–95. Google Scholar

3.

BK Agarwala , K Das , P Raychoudhury . 2007. Aphid-host plants interactions: esterase pattern in Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) clones from different host plants. Journal of Aphidology 21: 11–16. Google Scholar

4.

BK Agarwala , K Das , P Raychoudhury . 2009. Morphological, ecological and biological variations in the mustard aphid, Lipaphis pseudobrassicae (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) from different host plants. Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology 12: 169–173. Google Scholar

5.

BK Agarwala , N Datta . 1999. Life history response of mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi to phenological changes in its host. Journal of Bioscience 24, 2: 223–231. Google Scholar

6.

BK Agarwala , AFG Dixon . 1986. Population trends of Cervaphis schouteniae v. d. Goot on Microcoss paniculata and its relevance to the paucity of aphid species in India. Indian Biologists 17: 37–39. Google Scholar

7.

BK Agarwala , MR Ghosh . 1985. Biogeographical considerations of Indian Aphididae (Homoptera). Insecta Matsumurana 31: 81–96. Google Scholar

8.

RK Bhanotar , LK Ghosh . 1969. On oviparous morph of Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Aphididae: Homoptera) from West Bengal, India. Bulletin of Entomology 10, 1: 97–99. Google Scholar

9.

RL Blackman . 1987. Rearing and handling aphids. In: AK Minks and P Harrewijn , editors. Aphids: Their biology, Natural Enemies and Control 2B, pp.59–69. Elsevier. Google Scholar

10.

RL Blackman , VF Eastop . 1984. Aphids on the World's Crops: An Identification Guide. John Wiley. Google Scholar

11.

RL Blackman , JM Spence . 1992. The strawberry aphid complex, Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) spp. (Hemiptera: Aphididae): taxonomic significance of variations in karyotype, chaetotaxy and morphology. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77: 201–212. Google Scholar

12.

RL Blackman , JM Spence . 1992. Electrophoretic distinction between the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae, and the tobaco aphid M. nicotianae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 82: 161– 165 Google Scholar

13.

RK Butlin , 1995. Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 432–434. Google Scholar

14.

M Carver , DF Hales . 1983. Two new additions to the aphid fauna of Australia (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Australian Entomological Society 22: 297– 298. Google Scholar

15.

VD Damsteegt , DJ Voegtlin . 1990. Morphological and biological variation among populations of Aulacorthum solani (Homoptera: Aphididae), the vector of soyabean dwarf virus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83: 949– 955. Google Scholar

16.

Dixon AFG. 1998. Aphid Ecology , Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar

17.

AFG Dixon , PW Wellings . 1982. Seasonality and reproduction in aphids. International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction 5: 83– 89. Google Scholar

18.

VF Eastop , 1966. A taxonomic study of Australian Aphidoidea (Homoptera). Australian Journal of Zoology 14: 399–592. Google Scholar

19.

VF Eastop , 1967. A new species of Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel (Homoptera: Aphididae). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 102: 145–146. Google Scholar

20.

RG Foottit , HEL Maw , KS Pike and RH Miller . 2010. The identity of Pentalonia nigronervosa and P. caladii van der Goot (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on molecular and morphometric analysis. Zootaxa 2358: 25–38. Google Scholar

21.

DJ Futuyama , TE Philippi . 1987. Genetic variation and covariation in responses to host plant by Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Evolution 41: 269–279. Google Scholar

22.

G Gorur , 2000. The role of phenotypic plasticity in host race formation and sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects, particularly in aphids. Turkish Journal of Zoology 24: 63–68. Google Scholar

23.

G Gorur , C Lomonaco , A Mackenzie . 2005. Phenotypic plasticity in host-plant specialisation in Aphis fabae. Ecological Entomology 30: 657–664. Google Scholar

24.

G Gorur , C Lomonaco , A Mackenzie . 2007. Phenotypic plasticity in host choice behavior in black bean aphid, Aphis fabae (Momoptera: Aphididae). Arthropod Plant Interaction 1: 187–194. Google Scholar

25.

AJ Helden , AFG Dixon , N Carter . 1984. Environmental factors and morphological discrimination between spring and summer migrants of the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Homoptera: Aphididae). European Journal of Entomology 91: 23–28. Google Scholar

26.

Ris Lambers D Hille , 1966. Polymorphism in Aphididae. Annual Review of Entomology 11: 47–78. Google Scholar

27.

JS Hu , M Wang , D Sether , W Xie , KW Leonhardt . 1996. Use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to study transmission of banana bunchy top virus by the banana aphid (Pentalonia nigronervosa). Annals of Applied Biology 128: 55–64. Google Scholar

28.

CJ Krebs . 1985. The Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 3rd edition. Harper and Row. Google Scholar

29.

O Lorterio , 1993. Comparative development of Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel on five host plants. Philippine Entomologist. 9: 101– 151. Google Scholar

30.

HBJ Lowe , 1973. Variation in Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) reared on different host plants. Bulletin of Entomological Research 62: 549–556. Google Scholar

31.

JH Martin , ( 1987). Notes on the apterae viviparae of Pentalonia gavarri Eastop (Homoptera: Aphididae). Tropical Pest Management 33: 375–376. Google Scholar

32.

M Miyazaki , 1971. A revision of the tribe Macrosiphini of Japan (Homoptera: Aphididae; Aphidinae). Insecta Matsumurana 34: 1–247. Google Scholar

33.

M Miyazaki , 1987. Forms and morphs of aphids. In: A K Minks , P Harrewijn , editors. Aphids: Their biology, Natural Enemies and Control 2A , pp. 27–50. Elsevier. Google Scholar

34.

EP Odum . 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology , 3rd edition. Saunders. Google Scholar

35.

G Powell , CR Tosh , J Hardie . 2006. Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary and applied perspectives. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 309–330. Google Scholar

36.

PJ Radford , 1967. Description of some new or little known species of Aphis of Japan with a key to species. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 92: 519–556. Google Scholar

37.

P Rajan , 1981. Biology of Pentalonia nigronervosa f. caladii van der Goot, vector of “karte” disease of cardamom. Journal of Plantation Crops 9: 34–41. Google Scholar

38.

DG Rao , R Naidu . 1973. Studies on ‘Katte’ or mosaic disease of small cardamom. Journal of Plantation Crops 1: 129–136. Google Scholar

39.

DN Raychaudhuri . 1980. (ed.) Aphids of North East India and Bhutan. The Zoological Society, Calcutta, India. Google Scholar

40.

JD Robson , MG Wright , RPP Almeida . 2007. Biology of pentalonia nigronervosa (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on banana using different rearing methods. Environmental Entomology 36: 46–52. Google Scholar

41.

C Siddappaji , DRN Reddy . 1972. A note on the occurrence of the aphid Pentalonia nigronervosa form caladii van der Goot (aphididae-Homoptera) on cardamom (Elettaria cardamum). Mysore Journal of Agricultural Science 6: 194–195. Google Scholar

42.

SM Singh , TK Cunningham . 1981. Morphological and genetic differentiation in aphids (Aphididae). Canadian Entomologist 113: 539–550. Google Scholar

43.

O Thinbhuvanamala , GS Doraiswami , T Ganapathy . 2005. Detection of BVTV in the aphid vector using (DAS)-ELISA. Indian Journal of Virology 16: 12–14. Google Scholar

44.

T Tuschida , R Koga , M Sakurai , T Fukatsu . 2006. Facultative bacterial endosymbionts of three aphid species, Aphis craccivora, Mregoura crassicauda and Acyrthosiphon pisum, sympatrically found om the same host plants. Applied Entomology and Zoology 41 : 129–137. Google Scholar

45.

S Via , 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptations in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural sysetms. Annual Review of Entomology 35: 421–446. Google Scholar

46.

S Via , 1991. The genetic structure of host plant adaptation in a spatial patchwork — demographic variability among reciprocally transplanted pea aphid clones. Evolution 45: 827–852. Google Scholar

47.

M Watt , DF Hales . 1996. Dwarf phenotype of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera Aphididae). Australian Journal of Entomology 35: 153–159. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Parna Bhadra and B. K. Agarwala "A Comparison of Fitness Characters of Two Host Plant-Based Congeneric Species of the Banana Aphid, Pentalonia Nigronervosa and P. Caladii," Journal of Insect Science 10(140), 1-13, (1 August 2010). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.14001
Received: 15 January 2010; Accepted: 1 July 2010; Published: 1 August 2010
KEYWORDS
genotypes
host plant-specific forms
host transfer
Back to Top