BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2010 Molecular Cloning, Expression Profile and 5′ Regulatory Region Analysis of Two Chemosensory Protein Genes from the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella
Liang Gong, Guo-Hua Zhong, Mei-Ying Hu, Qian Luo, Zhen-Zhen Ren
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Chemosensory proteins play an important role in transporting chemical compounds to their receptors on dendrite membranes. In this study, two full-length cDNA codings for chemosensory proteins of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) were obtained by RACE-PCR. PxylCSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4, with GenBank accession numbers ABM92663 and ABM92664, respectively, were cloned and sequenced. The gene sequences both consisted of three exons and two introns. RT-PCR analysis showed that Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 had different expression patterns in the examined developmental stages, but were expressed in all larval stages. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that lepidopteran insects consist of three branches, and Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 belong to different branches. The 5′regulatory regions of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 were isolated and analyzed, and the results consist of not only the core promoter sequences (TATA-box), but also several transcriptional elements (BR-C Z4, Hb, Dfd, CF2-II, etc.). This study provides clues to better understanding the various physiological functions of CSPs in P. xylostella and other insects.

Introduction

In recent years, the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) has become the most destructive insect of cruciferous plants throughout the world, and the annual cost for its management is estimated to be US $1 billion (Talekar 1993). In order to find the solution, differentially expressed genes from this insect should be identified, cloned, and studied. In this regard, the study of chemosensory proteins of P. xylostella will be helpful in providing critical information about their behavioral characteristics and relative physiological processes.

Insect chemosensory proteins (CSPs) and odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are believed to be involved in chemical communication and perception, and these two soluble proteins belong to different classes. OBPs have the size of approximately 150 amino acid residues, out of which six highly conserved cysteines are paired to form three disulfide bridges. It has been experimentally demonstrated that OBPs are involved in the binding of pheromones and odorant molecules (Vogt 1881; Kruse 2003; Andronopoulou 2006). CSPs are small proteins of about 110 amino acids that contain four cysteines forming two disulfide bridges (McKenna 1994; Pikielny 1994; Jansen 2007). In comparison to OBPs, which are specifically reported in olfactory sensilla (Vogt and Riddiford 1981; Steinbrecht 1998), the CSPs are expressed more extensively in various insect tissues such as the antennae, head, thorax, legs, wings, epithelium, testes, ovaries, pheromone glands, wing disks, and compound eyes, suggesting that CSPs are crucial for multiple physiological functions of insects (Gong 2007). Similarly, the study of gene expression in different insect stages can reveal the possible extent of activity of these specific genes in the physiology of the different stages.

In the last two decades, insect chemosensory proteins have been studied extensively for their structural properties, various physiological functions, affinity to small molecular ligands, expression pattern in insects, and subcellular localization, but little research has been reported on the analysis of the 5′-regulatory sequence of the chemosensory protein gene. In this study, the full-length cDNA was cloned for two chemosensory protein genes (Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4) in P. xylostella, using rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). It was followed by the genome walking method to obtain the 5′-upstream regulatory sequence of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4. The results revealed not only the core promoter sequences (TATA-box), but also several transcriptional elements (BR-C Z4, Hb, Dfd, CF2-II etc).

Materials and Methods

Insects

P. xylostella pupae were collected from an insecticide-free cabbage field and taken to the laboratory for rearing. Larvae were allowed to feed on cabbage leaves in the insect growth room with conditions set at 25 ± 1° C, 16:8 L:D, and 70–85% RH until pupation.

RNA preparation and synthesis of firststrand cDNA

Total RNA was extracted from adults of P. xylostella using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen,  www.invitrogen.com) according the protocol provided by the manufacturer. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA with reverse transcriptase AMV and oligod (T)18 (TaKaRa,  www.takara-bio.com). 5′- and 3′-RACE-ready cDNA were prepared according to the instructions of the Gene Racer™ Kit protocol (Catalog #: L1500-01, Invitrogen).

Cloning of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4

Two degenerate primers were designed by alignment of published CSP-like transcripts from distantly related species. The 3′ RACE forward primers of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 are 5′-(C/T)AC(A/G)GA(T/C)AA(A/G)CA (C/G)GAA(A/G)C(C/A)(A/T)GCCGTGA-3′ and 5′-GAA(A/G)ACCA(C/T)C(C/T)GCGG CAA (G/C/A)TGCA -3′, respectively, and oligod (T)18 was used as the reverse primer. The PCR reaction was performed with the following conditions: one cycle (94° C, 2 min); 35 cycles (94° C, 1 min; 55° C, 1 min; 72° C, 1 min); and a last cycle 72° C for 10 min. The PCR product was then cloned into a pMD-20-T vector (TaKaRa), and positive clones were sequenced.

According to the CSP-like transcript fragment amplified from P. xylostella by 3′ RACE degenerate primers, the 5′-RACE specific nest primers were designed and used to amplify the full-length cDNA of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4. The 5′-RACE primer and 5′-RACE nest primer of Pxyl-CSP3 are 5′-CCTCC ACTCCGCGGGCTTGTGGTTGAT-3′ and 5′-TACGCCTTGACAGCGCGCAGTTGGT CC-3′, respectively. The 5′-RACE primer and 5′-RACE nest primer of Pxyl-CSP4 are 5′-CTTGGCGAAGGAGTCCTTGTACTCTCC-3′ and 5′-TCAGAAGATGTCATCTAAGT TC-3′, respectively. The first PCR conditions were as follows: one cycle (94° C, 2 min); 5 cycles (94° C, 30 s; 72° C, 1 min); 5 cycles (94° C, 30 s; 72° C, 1 min); 25cycles (94° C, 30 s; 66° C, 30 s; 70° C, 1 min); and a last cycle of 72° C for 10 min. Full-length cDNA of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 was obtained by overlapping the two cDNA fragments.

Table 1.

Specific primers (SP1, SP2, and SP3) were designed for (first, second, and third round) genome walking, respectively, which is based on the genome sequence of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4. Primers of CSP3-sqPCR and CSP4-sqPCR were designed for RT-PCR.

t01_01.gif

Genomic DNA isolation and DNA sequence amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from P. xylostella according to the instructions from the TIANamp Genomic DNA kit protocol (Tiangen,  www.tiangen.com). Genomic DNA was precipitated with ddH2O, and agarose gel electrophoresis was carried out to determine its quality. It was shown on a single band. The specific primers were designed to amplify the genomic DNA corresponding to the cDNA code region of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-csp4. In order to clone the genomic sequence of Pxyl-CSP3, the sense primer was 5′-ATGAACTCCTTGGTACTAGTATGCCTTG-3′, and the antisense primer was 5′-TACGCCTTGACAGCGCGCAGTTGGTCC-3′. For Pxyl-CSP4, the sense primer was 5′-ATGCAGACCGTGACTCTCCTATGCCTG T-3′, and the antisense primer was 5′-TTAATCAGATCCTTCGAGGAACTTGGC G-3′. The PCR reaction was performed with the following conditions: one cycle (94° C, 2 min); 35 cycles (94° C, 30 s; 68° C, 45 s; 72° C, 1 min) and a last cycle 72° C for 10 min. The amplified DNA was sequenced.

Isolation of genomic 5′- upstream region of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4

Genomic DNA of P. xylostella was prepared as above. In order to obtain the 5′-upstream regulatory sequences of the chemosensory protein genes, the genome walking approach was performed according to the introductions of the kit (TaKaRa). The PCR principle of the genome walking approach is thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (Tail-PCR). The specific reverse primers were designed according to 5′-terminal nucleotide sequence of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 (Table 1), and the forward primers were supported by the kit. The conditions for the were PCR reaction were set according to the kit's introductions. The PCR fragments obtained through the genome walking approach were detected using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and purified for sequencing using SP3 specific primer.

RT- PCR analysis

RT-PCR was used to measure gene expression at different developmental stages. The cDNA samples from male and female adults, from all stages of larvae and from pre-pupae and pupae, were prepared using the plant RNA kit (Catalog #: R6827, Omega,  www.omega.com) and reverse transcriptase AMV (TaKaRa).

The gene-specific primer was designed from the cDNA sequences of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4, named CSP3-sqPCR and CSP4-sqPCR, respectively (Table 1). The 18S rRNA gene of P. xylostella was used as the reference with the following primers: 18S-F: 5′-CCGATTGAATGATTTAGTGAGGTCTT-3′; 18S-R: 5′-TCCCCTACGGA AACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′. The cDNA (1–2 µl) was used for amplification, and the final volume of the reaction mixture was 50 µl. The PCR amplification was performed using the following thermal cycle conditions: one cycle (94° C, 2min); 27 cycles (94° C, 30 s; 60° C, 45 s; 72° C,1 min) and a last cycle 72° C for 10 min. PCR products were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Bioinformatics analysis

Amino acid sequences of CSPs (n = 27) were retrieved from an NCBI protein search using the keywords “chemosensory protein” and “lepidopteran”. Molecular mass and isoelectric point was predicted using the software, ExPASy ( http://www.expasy.ch/). Multiple sequence alignment was carried out with the online service at  http://bioinfo.genotoul.fr/multalin/multalin.html (Corpet 1988). Promoter prediction and characterization were carried out using the Neural Network Promoter Prediction (NNPP) server ( http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html) (Reese 2001). Sequence analysis seeking transcriptional regulation response elements was carried out with TFSEARCH ( http://www.cbrc.jp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html) (Heinemeyer 1998). The signal peptide was predicted using SignalP 3.0 (Nielsen 1997) at  http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-3.0/. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 3.0 software (Kumar 2004) using the neighbour joining method, and it was reconstructed with 1000-replicate bootstrap analysis.

Results

Gene cloning of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4

A 526 bp cDNA of Pxyl-CSP3 (Figure 1B) was obtained by RACE-PCR using the degenerate primers. The cDNA included a 62 bp 5′ untranslated region (UTR), a 108 bp 3′ UTR, with an AATAAA box and 25 bp poly (A) tail, and a 381 bp open reading frame (ORF) that encodes 126 amino acids. It exhibited significant similarity to CSP5 of Bombyx mori (59%), CSP3 of Bombyx mandarina (58%), and CSP3 of Mamestra brassicae (58%), as revealed by Blast database research. The deduced protein has a computed molecular mass of 14.1 kDa and a predicted isoelectric point of 8.79.

An 864 bp cDNA of Pxyl-CSP4 (Figure 2) was obtained by RACE-PCR using the degenerate primers. The cDNA included a 54 bp 5′ untranslated region (UTR), a 429 bp 3′ UTR, with an AATAAA box and 23 bp poly (A) tail, and a 381 bp open reading frame (ORF) that encodes 126 amino acids. It exhibited significant similarity to CSP6 of Papilio xuthus (68%), CSP8 of Bombyx mori (52%) and CSP4 of Choristoneura fumiferana (46%), as revealed by Blast database research. The deduced protein has a computed molecular mass of 14.0 kDa and a predicted isoelectric point of 8.25.

Genomic characterization of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4

PCR amplification of genomic DNA with primers designed corresponding to the cDNA of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 resulted in products of about 1452 bp and 1268 bp, respectively. By comparing their genomic sequence and cDNA sequence, it was found that Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 included one intron, and the intron began with ‘GT’, ended with AG, and had 926 bp and 404 bp, respectively. The sequences of the exon/intron-splicing junctions of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 are shown in Figure 1B and Figure 2, respectively.

5′ upstream regulatory region analysis of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4

Using the genome working approach, the 5′ regulatory regions of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 were isolated and had 2242 bp and 533 bp, with the Genebank Numbers FJ948816 and FJ948817, respectively. Nucleotide sequence alignment of the isolated genomic sequence with the full-length Pxyl-CSP4 cDNA showed that the nucleotide sequence of 264 bp was isolated from the 5′ UTR of Pxyl-CSP4, including a part of the intron sequence.

Nucleotide sequence alignment of the isolated genomic clone with the full-length Pxyl-CSP3 cDNA revealed that the 5′ UTR (Figure 1A) was interrupted by an intron of 323 bp, and thus was split in two exons of 61 and 75 bp, respectively. This intron also is in line with the GT-AG rule. The Pxyl-CSP3 5′ upstream region of 1921 bp was analyzed to predict the transcription factor binding site, using the online server of TFSEARCH. The results of Figure 1A showed that the 5′ upstream region of Pxyl-CSP3 included not only the core promoter sequences (TATA-box), but also several transcriptional elements (BR-C Z4, Hb, Dfd, CF2-II, etc.).

Expression profile of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4

RT-PCR was used to investigate the expression at different developmental stages. The results showed that Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 have different expression patterns in examined developmental stages. Pxyl-CSP3 (Figure 3A) was highly expressed in the first instar larva, second instar larva, third instar larva, fourth instar larva ♀, fifth instar larva ♂, pre-pupa ♀, and pre-pupa ♂, but no expression was obtained in pupa ♀ or pupa ♂. Lower expression was observed in adult ♀ and adult ♂. In the case of Pxyl-CSP4 (Figure 3B), higher expression was found in first instar larva, second instar larva, third instar larva, fourth instar larva ♀, and fifth instar larva ♂, while pre-pupa ♀, pre-pupa ♂, adult ♂, and adult ♂ expressed lower expression, and no expression was found in pupa ♀ or pupa ♂.

Figure 1.

Part of the nucleotide sequence of the Pxyl-CSP3 5′upstream region (A) and cDNA and predicted amino acid sequence of Pxyl-CSP (B). A: Putative promoter sequences are indicted in box, several transcriptional elements are shown by underline. Transcriptional start site is designated as +1 and the 5′ splice site “GT” and 3' splice site “AG” of this intron are shown by italic and underlined fonts. B: Conserved Cys sites are shaded in gray.The signal peptide is boxed. The locations of intron are shown by boldfaced minuscule letters in bracket. The stop codon is indicated by an asterisk. The locations of the initial degenerate primers for 3′RACE are represented by arrow. The start codon and AATAAA-box showed in boldface.

f01a_01.eps
f01b_01.eps

Figure 2.

cDNA and predicted amino acid sequence of Pxyl-CSP4 gene. Conserved Cys sites are shaded in gray. The signal peptide is boxed. The locations of intron are shown by boldfaced minuscule letters in bracket and the introne sequence are shown in the following. The stop codon is indicated by an asterisk. The locations of the initial degenerate primers for 3′RACE are also shown. The start codon and AATAAA-box are shown in boldface. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.eps

Homology and phylogenetic analysis

The evolutionary relationships among the two P. xylostella CSPs and 25 lepidopteran insect homologs that are reported so far were investigated. An unrooted neighbor-joining tree (Figure 4) was constructed to represent the relationship among selected CSPs. One CSP of Daphnia pulex was used for the outgroup. The results obtained from the phylogenetic analysis showed that lepidopteran insects consist of three branches, and Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 belong to different branches as well. It provides clues about the diversification of these proteins in this insect order.

Amino acid sequence alignment from selected lepidopteran CSPs revealed that the conserved Cys spacing pattern was CX6CX18CX2C, and it was the common spacing pattern within the CSP family. Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 have only 38% similarity. Pxyl-CSP3 showed high similarity to CSP3 of Mamestra brassicae (56%), but Pxyl-CSP4 showed higher similarity to CSP of Papilio xuthus (69%), suggesting that CSPs from the species of P. xylostella are more similar to CSPs from other species than to that of some members of its own.

Figure 3.

RT-PCR analysis showed the expression of Pxyl-CSP3 (A) and Pxyl-CSP4 (B) at different developmental stages. The horizontal data represents from 1 to 11: first instar larva, second instar larva, third instar larva, fourth instar larva ♀, fourth instar larva ♂, pre-pupa ♀, pre-pupa ♂, pupa ♀, pupa ♂, adult ♀, and adult ♂. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.eps

Discussion

Insect chemosensory proteins (CSPs) have been supposed to transport chemical stimuli from air to olfactory receptors. However, CSPs are expressed in various insect tissues including non-sensory tissues, suggesting that these proteins are also vital for other physiological processes. In this study, two full-length cDNA coding for chemosensory proteins of P. xylostella (Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4) were obtained by RACE-PCR, and the GenBank accession numbers are ABM92663 and ABM92664, respectively.

The majority of CSP genes in insects have an intron; only three Anopheles gambiae and four Drosophila CSP genes lack introns; the intron splice site is always located on one nucleotide after a conserved lysine (Lys) codon, and its position is indicated by dark cycle (Figure 5). These results are accordant with the findings of Wanner (2004), as the intron splice sites of Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 are after the nucleotide acids AAA (Lys) T and AAA (Lys) C, respectively. This conserved splice site is considered to be a general characteristic of the CSP gene family, so it is evident that these clones belong to this family.

Figure 4.

A phylogenetic tree of CSPs from 2 Plutella xylostella CSPs and 25 lepidopteran insect homologs. Protein Ids are indicated. Abbreviations: Pcan, Pieris conidia; Prap, Pieris rapae; Hzea, Helicoverpa zea; Harm, Helicoverpa armigera; Pxut, Papilio xuthus; Mbra, Mamestra brassicae; Hvir, Heliothis virescens; Bmor, Bombyx mori; Cfum, Choristoneura fumiferana; Sexi, Spodoptera exigua; Slit, Spodoptera litura; Dpul, Daphnia pulex. High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.eps

Insect CSP genes are not only expressed in the olfactory tissues but also in non-olfactory tissues, including the antennae, head, thorax, legs, wings, epithelium, testes, ovaries, and pheromone glands (Gong 2007; Lu 2007).

Figure 5.

Deduced amino acid alignment of Plutella xylostella and CSPs from other insects. Signal peptides are indicated by background of grey and conserved cysteines residues are marked by star, conserved lysine (Lys) showed by dark cycle. Alpha helical domains (H1–H6) identified according to Mamestra brassicae chemosensory protein 6. Aromatic residues at positions 27, 81, and 94 are shown by dark arrowheads. High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.eps

This wide tissue expression pattern may indicate that CSPs have olfactory and nonolfactory functions. The data here shows that Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 have different expression profiles in different developmental stages and that they were all expressed in larval stage. So, it is suggested that Pxyl-CSP3 and Pxyl-CSP4 have important functions for early development of P. xylostella, but the detailed physiological role is still unknown.

CSPs are widely distributed in insect species and so far have been identified in 10 insect orders, including Lepidoptera (Maleszka 1997; Robertson 1999; Nagnan-L Meillour 2000; Picimbon 2000), Diptera (McKenna 1994; Pikielnyl 1994), Hymenoptera (Danty 1998; Briand 2002), Orthoptera (Angeli 1999), Phasmatodea (Tuccini 1996), Blattoidea (Kitabayashi 1998), Hemiptera (Jacobs 2005), Phthiraptera (Zhou 2006), Trichoptera (Zhou 2006), and Coleoptera (Zhou 2006). A CSP-like protein has been reported in a non-insect arthropod, the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana, suggesting that CSPs might be present across the arthropods (Pelosi 2006). But CSPs belong to a conserved protein family, and CSPs in different insect orders have shared common characteristics such as: conserved Cys residues spacing pattern; aromatic residues at positions 27, 85, and 98 that are also highly conserved; and a novel type of α-helical structure with six helices connected by α-α loops. This data (Figure 5) corresponds to those sequence and structure characteristics as confirmed by multiple sequence alignment. Homology and phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that CSPs from the species of P. xylostella are more similar to CSPs from other species than to some members of its own, suggesting evolutionary divergence in CSPs of P. xylostella.

Gene promoter sequence and transcription factor recognition site analysis are important for understanding regulation and feedback mechanisms in specific physiological processes. This study succeeded in isolating the 5′ regulatory region of Pxyl-CSP3 and is the first report about the 5′ upstream regulatory sequence of the insect chemosensory protein gene. This data revealed that the 5′ regulatory region of Pxyl-CSP3 have a lot of specific transcription factor binding sites including BR-C Z4, Hb, Dfd, CF2-II, etc. The transcription factor binding site of BR-C Z4 has appeared many times in this regulatory region, which may play an important role for duplication and expression of Pxyl-CSP3. It has been reported that BR-C Z4 directly mediates the formation of the steroid hormone ecdysone for Drosophila melanogaster larvae metamorphosis (Kalm 1994). However, there is no direct evidence for the role of CSPs in insect metamorphosis, but some scientists reported that CSPs are expressed in the pheromonal gland of M. brassicae and the ejaculatory duct of D. melanogaster (Jacquin-Joly 2001; Sabatier 2003). A recent report also showed that the CSP homologue of Agrotis segetum has upregulation expression in the insect-pheromone binding domain; this CSP has also been reported to be the same as juvenile hormone binding protein (Strandh 2008). These findings are in line with the data from the transcription factor binding site analysis, as well as the high expression in the larval stage, which may implicate a function of Pxyl-CSP3 for steroid hormone production or transport in this insect larval stage. Chemosensory protein association with insect development has been confirmed by many scientists, especially in embryo development. For example, CSP5 of Apis mellifera is an ectodermal gene involved in embryonic integument formation (Maleszka 2007). In the cockroach Periplaneta americana, the CSP p10 increases transiently during limb regeneration at the larval stages (Kitabayashi 1998). The transcription factor binding sites of Hb, Dfd, and CF2-II have been shown to be involved in developmental regulation; for instance, Hb regulates gene expression in the development of the thoracic region of Drosophila embryos (McGregorl 2001), and CF2 may potentially regulate distinct sets of target genes during development (Gogos 1992). This study will provide clues to better understand the function of CSPs in insect development.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by grants from the China National Nature Science Foundation (No. 30671387 and 30770291) and Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P R China (FANEDD, No.200461).

Abbreviations:

BR-C Z4

Broad-Complex Z4;

CSP

Chemosensory protein;

CF2-II

Zinc finger domain;

Dfd

Deformed;

Hb

Hunchback;

ORF

open reading frames;

Pxyl

Plutella xylostella;

RACE

rapid amplification of cDNA ends;

UTR

untranslated region.

References

1.

E Andronopoulou , V Labropoulou , V Douris , DF Woods , H Biessmann , K Iatrou . 2006. Specific interactions among odorant-binding proteins of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Insect Molecular Biology 15: 797–811. Google Scholar

2.

S Angeli , F Ceron , A Scaloni , M Monti , G Monteforti , A Minnocci , R Petacchi , P Pelosi . 1999. Purification, structural characterization cloning and immunocytochemical localization of chemoreception proteins from Schistocerca gregaria. European Journal of Biochemistry 262: 745–754. Google Scholar

3.

L Briand , C Swasdipan , V Nespoulous , F Bezirard , JC Blon , P Huet , P Ebert , JC Pernollet . 2002. Characterization of a chemosensory protein (ASP3c) from honeybee (Apis mellifera L) as a brood pheromone carrier. European Journal of Biochemistry 269: 4586–4596. Google Scholar

4.

F Corpet . 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Research 16: 10881–10890. Google Scholar

5.

E Danty , G Arnold , JC Huet , D Huet , C Masson , JC Pernollet . 1998. Separation, characterization and sexual heterogeneity of multiple putative odorant-binding proteins in the honeybee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidea). Chemical Senses 23: 83–91. Google Scholar

6.

DP Gong , HJ Zhang , P Zhao , Y Lin , QY Xia , ZH Xiang . 2007. Identification and expression pattern of the chemosensory protein gene family in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 37: 266–277. Google Scholar

7.

JA Gogos , T Hsu , J Bolton , FC Kafatos . 1992. Sequence discrimination by alternatively spliced isoforms of a DNA binding zinc finger domain. Science 257: 1951–1955. Google Scholar

8.

T Heinemeyer , E Wingender , I Reuter , H Hermjakob , AE Kel , OV Kel , E V Ignatieva , EA Ananko , OA Podkolodnaya , FA Kolpakov , NL Podkolodny , NA Kolchanov . 1998. Databases on transcriptional regulation: TRANSFAC, TRRD, and COMPEL. Nucleic Acids Research 26: 364–370. Google Scholar

9.

SP Jacobs , AP Liggins , JJ Zhou , JA Pickett , X Jin , LM Field . 2005. OS-D-like genes and their expression in Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insect Molecular Biology 14: 423–432. Google Scholar

10.

S Jansen , J Chmelík , L Zídek , P Padrta , P Novák , Z Zdráhal , JF Picimbon , C Löfstedt , V Sklenár . 2007. Structure of Bombyx mori Chemosensory Protein 1 in solution. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 66: 135–145. Google Scholar

11.

E Jacquin-Joly , RG Vogt , MC Francois , P Nagnan-Le Meillour . 2001. Functional and expression pattern analysis of chemosensory proteins expressed in antennae and pheromonal gland of Mamestra brassicae. Chemical Senses 26: 833–844. Google Scholar

12.

SW Kruse , R Zhao , DP Smith , DNM Jones . 2003. Structure of a specific alcohol-binding site defined by the odorant binding protein LUSH from Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 10: 694–700. Google Scholar

13.

S Kumar , K Tamura , M Nei . 2004. MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinformatics 5: 150–163. Google Scholar

14.

AN Kitabayashi , T Arai , T Kubo , S Natori . 1998. Molecular cloning of cDNA for p10, a novel protein that increases in regenerating legs of Periplaneta americana (American cockroach). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 28: 785–790. Google Scholar

15.

LV Kalm , K Crossgrove , DV Seggern , G.M Guild , SK Beckendorf . 1994. The Broad-Complex directly controls a tissue specific response to the steroid hormone ecdysone at the onset of Drosophila metamorphosis. The EMBO Journal 13: 3505–3516. Google Scholar

16.

DG Lu , XR Li , XX Liu , QW Zhang . 2007. Identification and molecular cloning of putative odorant-binding proteins and chemosensory protein from the Bethylid Wasp, Scleroderma guani Xiao et Wu. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33: 1359–1375. Google Scholar

17.

H Nielsen , J Engelbrecht , S Brunak , G von Heijne . 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Engineering 10: 1–6. Google Scholar

18.

P Nagnan-L Meillour , AH Cain , E Jacquin-Joly , MC Francois , S Ramachandran , R Maida , RA Steinbrecht . 2000. Chemosensory proteins from the proboscis of Mamestra brassicae. Chemical Senses 25: 541–553. Google Scholar

19.

MP McKenna , DS Hekmat-Scafe , P Gaines , JR Carlson . 1994. Putative Drosophila pheromone-binding proteins expressed in a subregion of the olfactory system. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269: 16340–16347. Google Scholar

20.

R Maleszka , G Stange . 1997. Molecular cloning, by a novel approach, of a cDNA encoding a putative olfactory protein in the labial palps of the moth Cactoblastis cactorum. Gene 202: 39–43. Google Scholar

21.

J Maleszka , S Forêt , R Saint , R Maleszka . 2007. RNAi-induced phenotypes suggest a novel role for a chemosensory protein CSP5 in the development of embryonic integument in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Development Genes and Evolution 217: 189–196. Google Scholar

22.

AP McGregor , PJ Shaw , GA Dover . 2001. Sequence and expression of the hunchback gene in Lucilia sericata: A comparison with other Dipterans. Development Genes and Evolution 211: 315–318. Google Scholar

23.

JF Picimbon , K Dietrich , S Angeli , A Scaloni , J Krieger , H Breer , P Pelosi . 2000. Purification and molecular cloning of chemosensory proteins from Bombyx mori. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 44: 120–129. Google Scholar

24.

P Pelosi , JJ Zhou , LP Ban , M Calvello . 2006. Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 63: 1658–1676. Google Scholar

25.

CW Pikielny , G Hasan , F Rouyer , M Rosbach . 1994. Members of a family of Drosophila putative odorant-binding proteins are expressed in different subsets of olfactory hairs. Neuron 12: 35–49. Google Scholar

26.

MG Reese . 2001. Application of a time-delay neural network to promoter annotation in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Computational Biology and Chemistry 26: 51–56. Google Scholar

27.

HM Robertson , R Martos , CR Sears , EZ Todres , KK Waiden , JB Nardi . 1999. Diversity of odorant binding proteins revealed by an expressed sequence tag project on male Manduca sexta moth antennae. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 8: 501–518. Google Scholar

28.

L Sabatier , E Jouanaguy , C Dostert . 2003. Pherokine-2 and -3 two Drosophila molecules related to pheromone/odor-binding proteins induced by viral and bacterial infections. European Journal of Biochemistry 270: 3398–3407. Google Scholar

29.

M Strandh , T Johansson , D Ahrén . 2008. Transcriptional analysis of the pheromone gland of the turnip moth, Agrotis segetum (Noctuidae), reveals candidate genes involved in pheromone production. Insect Molecular Biology 17: 73–85. Google Scholar

30.

RA Steinbrecht . 1998. Odorant-binding proteins: Expression and function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855: 323–332. Google Scholar

31.

A Tuccini , R Maida , P Rovero , M Mazza , P Pelosi . 1996. Putative odorant-binding protein in antennae and legs of Carausius morosus (Insecta, Phasmatodea). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 26: 19–24. Google Scholar

32.

NS Talekar , AM Shelton . 1993. Biology, ecology, and management of the Diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 275–301. Google Scholar

33.

RG Vogt , LM Riddiford . 1981. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature 293: 161–163. Google Scholar

34.

KW Wanner , LG Willis , DA Theilmann . 2004. Analysis of the insect os-d-like gene family. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 889–911. Google Scholar

35.

JJ Zhou , YC Kan , J Antoniw , JA Pickett , LM Field . 2006. Genome and EST analyses and expression of a gene family with putative functions in insect chemoreception. Chemical Senses 31: 453–465. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Liang Gong, Guo-Hua Zhong, Mei-Ying Hu, Qian Luo, and Zhen-Zhen Ren "Molecular Cloning, Expression Profile and 5′ Regulatory Region Analysis of Two Chemosensory Protein Genes from the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella," Journal of Insect Science 10(143), 1-15, (1 October 2010). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.14103
Received: 14 December 2008; Accepted: 1 June 2009; Published: 1 October 2010
KEYWORDS
cDNA cloning
genomic structure
transcription factor recognition site analysis
Back to Top