Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2010 Observations on the Nesting and Prey of the Solitary Wasp, Tachysphex inconspicuus, with a Review of Nesting Behavior in the T. obscuripennis species group
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The nesting behaviors of 10 females of Tachysphex inconspicuus (Kirby) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) were studied on a sandy, mowed lawn at the La Selva Biological Station in northeastern Costa Rica on 27–29 April 1980. Twenty-four completed nests were observed, excavated, and measured. The nests had oblique, short burrows leading to one or two shallow cells. Prey cockroaches belonging to 11 species of Chorisoneura and Riatia fulgida (Saussure) (Blattaria: Blattellidae), all tropical wet forest canopy indicator species, were removed from the cells, weighed, and identified. The cockroaches consisted mainly of adult females, selectively preyed upon over adult males and nymphs due to their larger sizes. The aggregate prey mass in cells was separable into prospective larger (heavier) female and smaller (lighter) male cells. Wasps usually oviposited on the heaviest cockroach in a cell, in most cases an adult female. Atypical genus behavior included (1) prey being carried to one side of the wasp and perhaps grasped by a hindleg during removal of the temporary entrance closure and nest entry and (2) wasp's egg being laid affixed to a forecoxal corium and extending backward in a longitudinally posteriad position across the prey's ventral thorax. A comparison with the nesting behavior of other species in the Tachysphex obscuripennis species group is made.

Introduction

Tachysphex is a very large, highly evolved and complex genus of small ground-nesting solitary wasps, with 445 species worldwide and 85 species in North America, Central America, and the Caribbean Region (Bohart and Menke 1976; Pulawski 1988, 2009). The species are mainly cursorial and fast moving (Williams 1914) as the genus name implies (tachys = swift, sphex = wasp). The North American, Central American, and Caribbean Tachysphex excavate mostly short burrows and shallow cells in sandy, gravelly, or (rarely) loamy soils. They stock their cells with grasshoppers (Acrididae), katydids (Tettigoniidae), crickets (Gryllidae), cockroaches (Blattaria), and mantids (Mantodea) (Krombein 1979; Kurczewski 1966, 2010; Pulawski 1974, 1988). There is even a single record of T. apricus Pulawski pinned with a nymphal walking stick (Phasmodea) more than four times its length (Elliott and Kurczewski 1985), although Pulawski (1988) questions its authenticity.

The Tachysphex obscuripennis species group is the only group known to prey on cockroaches (Evans et al. 1976; Krombein and Pulawski 1994; Kurczewski 2010; Pulawski 1971, 1974, 1988, 2007). This group has numerous species in the Afrotropical, Oriental, and Australasian Regions (Evans et al. 1976; Krombein and Pulawski 1994; Pulawski 1977, 2007). This group contains some of the more unusual species in the genus from the standpoint of morphology and behavior. The flattened scutum and scutellum of the female are apparently adaptations for hunting cockroaches, allowing the wasp to penetrate narrow crevices where the prey lives (Bohart and Menke 1976, Evans et al. 1976, Pulawski 2007). The stout, asymmetrical apical tarsal segments of the female with matlike vestiture on the ventral surface are probably adaptations for capturing and carrying the cockroach (Bohart and Menke 1976; Pulawski 2007). Some species in the obscuripennis group have fewer, shorter, wellspaced rake spines on the foretarsus than other Tachysphex (Bohart and Menke 1976; Pulawski 1988). Such a reduction in the foretarsal rake apparatus implies that these species may excavate their burrows in finergrained soils.

The obscuripennis group is poorly represented in the Nearctic, Caribbean, and Neotropical Regions with only three species: Tachysphex inconspicuus (Kirby) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae), T. iridipennis (F. Smith 1873), and T. alayoi Pulawski 1974 (Bohart and Menke 1976; Pulawski 1988). Tachysphex inconspicuus and T. iridipennis are moderately common in tropical regions of Mexico, Central America, and South America (Pulawski 1974, 1988). Tachysphex alayoi is found mainly in the West Indies (Pulawski 1988). All species hunt and stock their cells with small adult and nymphal cockroaches belonging to the family Blattellidae (Pulawski 1974, 1988), although there is one record of a nymphal cricket as prey (Buys 2007).

Relatively little is known about the ecology, nesting behavior, nest structure, and prey of the American cockroach-hunting species in the obscuripennis group. Elliott et al. (1979) collected provisioning females of T. alayoi on inland soils in the Bahamas, the wasps having flown from higher vegetation to the ground with slightly larger cockroaches of the genus Symploce. Genaro (2004) reported T. alayoi females nesting in barren, coarse-grained beach sand in Cuba and transporting cockroaches directly into open burrows. One burrow was 11 cm long with a single cell, 5 cm below the surface. It held two lightly paralyzed prey: an adult female and immature Cariblatta sp., 6.7 and 5.5 mm long, respectively. One of the cockroaches had some of its antennal and tarsal segments cut off, possibly due to the interaction with the wasp during capture (Genaro 2004). The wasp's egg was affixed to the forecoxa of a prey and extended backward across its thoracic venter.

Rau (1933) noted a T. iridipennis or T. inconspicuus female flying with a partly paralyzed Anaplecta asema on Barrow Colorado Island in the Panama Canal Zone. Vesey-FitzGerald (1956) collected females of T. iridipennis in Trinidad, evidently nesting in beach sand and provisioning with adult Cariblatta tobagensis. Pulawski (1988) reported adults of Euthlastoblatta abortiva and Ischnoptera rufa debilis as prey of T. iridipennis.

Williams (1941) described T. blatticidus, having since been synonymized with T. inconspicuus (Pulawski 1974), so named for several cockroaches (Blattaria: Blattellidae) from Trinidad being pinned with the wasps. Callan (1942) reported the mutillid Timulla eriphyla cleptoparasitizing the cells of T. blatticidus (= T. inconspicuus) in Trinidad. Callan (1954, 1993) noted T. inconspicuus nesting in sandy soils of a sandpit in Trinidad and sand beach in Venezuela and provisioning with the blattellids Chorisoneura fuscipennis, C. gemmicula, and Riatia orientis (Trinidad), and C. sp. (Venezuela). Buys (2006) described the last instar larva of T. inconspicuus, reared from an adult Chorisoneura excelsa in southeast Brazil.

Buys (2007) provided the most complete observations to date on the nesting behavior of an American cockroach-hunting Tachysphex. He observed the nesting behavior of T. inconspicuus at two locations in southeast Brazil, a sand beach and a sand-patched dirt road. Buys (2007) reported that females leveled the sand removed from their excavations, temporarily closed their nest entrances with soil, and then made orientation flights above the nesting area. Lightly paralyzed cockroaches were consecutively brought to the nest predominantly in flight. They were grasped by their antennae with the wasp's mandibles and by their body with the wasp's legs. A female removed the sand closure from her entrance with the forelegs, retaining her grasp of the prey's body with a hindleg as she hurriedly entered the burrow.

Nests of T. inconspicuus excavated by Buys (2007) were single-celled. They had an oblique burrow that terminated in a cell 6–7 cm deep in the sand beach, but only 1–2.5 cm deep in the sand-patched dirt road. Two to four adult and nymphal Chorisoneura, nymphal Riatia, and a single nymphal gryllid were found in the completed cells or collected from provisioning females. The cockroaches were positioned in a cell ventral side upward. The wasp's egg was laid on the ventral thorax of one of the last prey taken into the nest (Buys 2007).

The contents of T. inconspicuus cells were cleptoparasitized at the sand beach location by a miltogrammine fly, Amobia floridensis (Townsend) (Sarcophagidae) (Buys 2007). The wasps dug 1–4 “accessory” holes around their entrances in the sand beach to dissuade the cleptoparasitic flies from attempting larviposition in the burrows.

Four females of T. inconspicuus (det. W. J. Pulawski) in the Smithsonian Institution are pinned atop their Chorisoneura prey (det. G. Beccaloni). They were hand-netted at Kartabo Point, Guyana from 22–24 December 1983 by Warren E. Steiner. The wasps are 6–7 mm and the cockroaches are 8–9 mm long. The wasps were nesting in bare, level “deep white sand” in “dry sunlit spots” surrounded by “secondary disturbed rainforest” (Steiner W. E. 2009 personal observation).

Tachysphex inconspicuus, the subject of this study, is the commonest and most widely distributed of the American species in the obscuripennis group (Pulawski 1974, 1988). Females are black and 6–8.5 mm long (Pulawski 1988). Females of T. iridipennis are also black, but larger in size (8–10.5 mm, Pulawski 1988). In addition to being smaller, females of T. inconspicuus can be readily separated from those of T. iridipennis by the much longer setae of the foretarsal digging rake (Pulawski 1988). Females of T. alayoi are highly variable in size (6–12 mm) and black with the last three abdominal segments reddish (Pulawski 1988).

This study on the nesting behavior of T. inconspicuus compliments rather than duplicates Buys' (2007) study. Whereas Buys' (2007) study concentrated on above ground activities, this study focused on the wasps' nests, prey species, prey size (weights), hunting locale, and characteristic egg placement. The first photographs of some aspects of the nesting behavior of T. inconspicuus are presented.

Materials and Methods

Field observations on T. inconspicuus were made at the La Selva Biological Station in northeastern Costa Rica (10° 26′ N, 83° 59′ W). The aggregation nested in the soil beside the Old Station living quarters. Ten wasps and their nests were marked and observed 27–29 April 1980 in areas of exposed sandy soil in a level, mowed grassy lawn. Periodic rainfall interrupted some of the observations despite this period (February–April) being the driest of the year. The wasps were observed for approximately 12.5 h.

Additional collections of males and females of T. inconspicuus were made through 7 May 1980. Other visits to the station during March– June 1981, May 1986, September 1987, and December 1990 revealed no wasp activity at this site.

T. inconspicuus were timed during burrow excavation, temporary closure, orientation flight(s), hunting and prey transport, periodic returns to the nest with and without prey, and final closure. Certain individuals and their activities were photographed during aspects of the nesting sequence and contents of the cells they worked on were examined after the cell contents had been exhumed and sorted.

Twenty-four apparently completed nests were excavated during the three day study period. The dimensions of three nests and five cells were recorded and the nests sketched. In addition, prey taken from provisioning wasps and incomplete nests were collected. A total of 69 cockroaches were preserved at the station and later identified to species by Dr. Frank W. Fisk, the Ohio State University; Columbus, Ohio.

Burrow length, cell depth, and cell size (height, width, and length) were measured. The number of prey per fully provisioned cell, position of prey in the cell, and placement of the wasp's egg on the pedestal prey were recorded in the field. Prey were removed from the cells, placed in individual glassine envelopes according to nest and cell number, and weighed (wet). The aggregate prey weight of each fully provisioned cell was summed. Live eggs were measured under a microscope using an ocular micrometer.

Fresh aggregate and individual body mass (wet weight) of nymphs and adult males and females were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA, PROC GLM) in SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute 2004), followed by preplanned comparison of means using Fisher's least square difference (LSD, α = 0.05). Comparisons of the body mass of egg-bearing and non-egg-bearing prey within the same cell were done with the paired Student's t-test. Standard error of the mean is given with all means.

Results

Burrow excavation

Females began excavating their burrows with the mandibles. Once the mandibles loosened the surface soil, the forelegs were used to rake it backward beneath the synchronously lifting abdomen. The foretarsi bear a series of long, lateral spines that assist in moving the loosened sand grains. Females backed from their excavations at intervals to remove the loose sand that accumulated in the burrow and entrance. During this process, the forelegs were used in unison and the wings were held flat on the dorsum. Females distributed the removed soil to distances of 25–40 mm, raking it in various directions with the forelegs. This activity resulted in leveling the sand in front of the entrance. After leveling the sand sufficiently females entered their burrows, turned around, and reappeared headfirst in the opening. Facing away from the burrow, they flung sand grains and other surface debris into the opening with the forelegs as they exited. Four such temporary closures of the nest entrance lasted 1.3–2.3 min in duration. Length of time spent to excavate a burrow and make a temporary closure of the nest entrance was 39 and 50 min, respectively, in two examples.

Orientation flight

After making the initial temporary closure of the entrance, females made one or more orientation flights above the nest area. One wasp made three brief orientation flights in succession, landing on the ground surface near the nest between each flight. Another female made a single orientation flight that extended to a distance of 25 cm from the entrance before flying away. A third wasp flew in a figure eight configuration, beginning 5 cm from the filled entrance and ending 90 cm away before flying upward into the forest canopy to hunt for prey. Two extensive orientation flights lasted 4 and 7 min, respectively, including landings and pauses.

Prey transport and nest entry

No ground transport of prey was observed, although some cockroaches weighed two to three times the weight of the wasp. All 69 examples of prey transport indicated the prey is carried in flight from the forest canopy to the nest. Five females averaged 22.7 min (range = 8–45, n = 6) between consecutive returns to the nest with partly paralyzed cockroaches. Three wasps averaged 6.8 min (range = 1.5–11.0, n = 4) between consecutive returns to the nest without prey.

At the nest a female removed the temporary closure of the entrance using her forelegs and, retaining the grasp of the cockroach, entered the burrow rather rapidly without releasing the prey (Figure 1). The exact grasp of the cockroach during entry was not ascertained, although the field notes and one photograph indicate it was carried into the burrow to one side of the wasp and probably held by the hindleg on that side. After entering the burrow and placing the prey in the cell, a female reappeared in her entrance and re-closed the nest with soil and surface debris in about 2 min (n = 3). Wasps then flew almost straight upward into the forest canopy to search for additional prey.

Final closure

Three final closures of completed nests were observed. The wasps raked sand backward with the forelegs into their burrows, coming out of the entrance repeatedly to obtain additional sand and debris from the ground surface. Each backward entry into the burrow with sand was followed by quick bursts of tamping the soil in place at the bottom with the pygidial plate (terminal dorsal sclerite of the abdomen). Most tamping of the soil fill at the bottom of the burrow occurred inside the nest and out of sight. One wasp dug a shallow depression in the sand surface next to her entrance in order to obtain additional soil for the fill. Two final closures took 13.5 and 15.5 min, respectively.

Figure 1.

Tachysphex inconspicuus female removing temporary sand closure from nest entrance with forelegs while holding Chorisoneura prey to one side, perhaps with a hindleg, during nest entry. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.eps

Nest structure and dimensions

Females excavated short, shallow one- and two-celled nests, although it is not known whether all of the nests were finished. Twenty-two of 24(91.7%) nests were onecelled and two (8.3%) were two-celled. The burrows, 4–5 mm in diameter, entered the soil obliquely at 45–55° angles with the surface, leveled off, and went rather straight. One twocelled nest had cells at depths of 18 and 26 mm. Another two-celled nest had cells at depths of about 15 (2nd cell) and 30 mm (1st cell) beneath the surface. In the latter nest, the 2nd cell was more inclined than the 1st cell. Soil from the excavations leading to the second cells was probably used to fill the burrows leading to the first cells as females did not walk onto the surface to obtain additional soil. Burrow lengths, including cell lengths, of three nests were 28–45 mm. The elongate-oval cells were 7–8 mm high, 8–9 mm wide, and 15–18 mm long (n = 4).

Prey

Females preyed exclusively on small cockroaches belonging to the subfamily Pseudophyllodromiinae (family Blattellidae). Identified prey consisted of 1 adult of Riatia fulgida (Saussure) and 59 adults and 9 (13.0%) nymphs belonging to 11 species of Chorisoneura (Table 1). Five of the 11 species (45.5%) were undescribed, representing 24 of 60 adults (Table 1). Thirtyeight of the 60 (63.3%) adults were female and 22 (36.7%) were male. Six additional prey from three nests were not identified to species.

Table 1.

Species of prey of Tachysphex inconspicuus

t01_01.gif

Figure 2.

(A) Relationship between number of prey per cell and aggregate prey mass (wet weight) per cell (mean ± SEM) in 21 completed cells. Overall, the aggregate prey mass increased linearly with the number of prey per cell. (B) Frequency distribution of number of prey per cell in 24 completed cells. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.eps

Five of the six were adult females and one adult male, bringing the total sex ratio to 65.2% (43) females and 34.8% (23) males.

The number of prey per fully provisioned cell ranged from 1 to 5 (mean = 2.75 ± 0.23 (SEM), n = 24 cells). Twenty of 24 cells (83.3%) held 2, 3, or 4 prey (Figure 2). The aggregate prey mass per cell increased linearly with the number of prey per cell (Figure 2). The distribution of aggregate prey mass per cell appeared normal (Figure 3), and it is assumed that cells containing 1 or 2 prey would have produced male wasps and those with 4 or 5 prey, female wasps.

Some adult cockroaches were slightly longer than T. inconspicuus, but weighed (wet) two to three times as much. Adult prey measured 5.5–10.0 mm in body length with an average of about 8 mm. Adult female cockroaches weighed, on average, 21.7 ± 0.76 mg (range = 10.6–29.8, n = 36), adult males averaged 17.8 ± 1.27 mg (range = 9.9–30.5, n = 20), and nymphs averaged 12.4 ± 0.86 mg (range = 8.7–16.8, n = 9). There were highly significant differences among the weights (wet) of the three life stages (ANOVA, F = 15.299, df = 62, 2, P < 0.0001). The average weight (wet) of Tachysphex females with a body length of 7 mm approximates 10 mg (Kurczewski FE, personal observation).

The aggregate prey weights of 21 cells for which mass data were available ranged from 18.0 to 89.6 mg with an average of 54.9 ± 4.18 mg. Cells that would have presumably produced female wasps (4–5 prey) weighed 63.1–89.6 mg (mean = 73.2 ± 3.65, n = 7). Cells that may have given rise to male wasps (1–2 prey) weighed 18.0–50.0 mg (mean = 36.6 ± 3.39, n = 9, Figure 3). Most of the cockroaches were positioned in the cell head inward and ventral side upward or on the side.

Figure 3.

(A) Distribution of aggregate prey mass (wet weight) per cell across 21 completed cells. The cells are sorted in ascending order of aggregate prey mass. (B) Frequency distribution of aggregate prey mass per cell in 21 completed cells. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.eps

Mutilation

Accidental mutilation or purposeful amputation of the prey's antenna and leg segments was evident on some of the recently captured cockroaches (Figure 4). Accidental mutilation may have occurred during prey capture. Purposeful amputation may have preceded the wasp feeding on the cockroaches' hemolymph at the site of the disjunction.

Egg

The T. inconspicuus egg was usually laid on a cockroach at the bottom of the cell, near the back end. The prey to which the egg was affixed was invariably placed ventral side upward or tilted slightly on its side. The cockroach to which the egg was attached was the heaviest individual in 13 of 16 cells (81.3%), second heaviest (2 of 16, 12.5%), or lightest prey (1 of 16, 6.3%). Of the 19 cells for which both aggregate prey mass and a wasp egg were available, two fully provisioned cells held only a single prey. Including all cells for which aggregate prey mass was unavailable, 18 of 22 eggs (81.8%) were laid on female cockroaches, 3 of 22 eggs (13.6%) on male cockroaches, and 1 of 22 eggs (4.5%) on a nymphal cockroach. Oviposition on the lightest cockroach (nymph) occurred in an unusual cell provisioned with 5 prey: 3 adult males (11.0, 12.2, 13.0 mg), 1 adult female (18.3 mg), and 1 nymph (10.1 mg).

Egg-bearing cockroaches weighed 10.1–30.5 mg (mean = 23.8 ± 1.26, n =19). Other prey in the cells weighed 8.7–26.7 mg (mean = 17.2 ± 0.71, n = 44). Egg-bearing prey averaged significantly heavier than the mean weight of other prey in the same cells (t = 5.0241, n = 17, P = 0.0001) or in comparison to each prey within the cell (t = 4.2330, n = 32, P = 0.0002). Similarly, eggs were laid on the largest female in comparison to non-eggbearing females and on the largest male in comparison to non-egg-bearing males (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Contents of two-celled nest of Tachysphex inconspicuus with two and four prey, respectively, showing wasp eggs (arrows) affixed to forecoxal coria of 1st and 3rd cockroaches from left and extending longitudinally posteriad across thoracic venters. Riatia fulgida is on the far right; the other five cockroaches are Chorisoneura species. Note amputated antenna segments on some of the prey. High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.eps

The T. inconspicuus egg was affixed to the soft intersegmental membrane surrounding the base of a prey's forecoxa by the less tapered distal end (Figure 4). The proximal end extended longitudinally posteriad, across the thoracic venter of the cockroach. Two such eggs were slightly curved, sausage-shaped, white or ivory, and measured (live) 1.962– 2.191 mm long and 0.392–0.491 mm wide at the middle. One of the eggs weighed 0.3 mg.

Enemies

The nesting activities of the T. inconspicuus were interrupted frequently by several species of foraging ants of various sizes. One provisioning female disturbed by ants flew onto a leaf, 10 cm away, and released her cockroach. She flew back to her nest, faced off an ant, examined the plugged entrance, and flew away. Within minutes, other ants discovered the paralyzed cockroach and carried it to their nest 7 cm away.

A small ctenid or sparassid spider pounced on one nesting wasp. But, it immediately jumped off. A second pounce by the spider in the direction of the wasp caused her to fly away. The wasp later landed behind the spider causing it to jump away!

Discussion

Tachysphex inconspicuus, T. iridipennis, and T. alayoi nest through much of the year in the tropics in synchrony with alternating wet and dry seasons. Tachysphex inconspicuus and T. iridipennis have been collected in nearly every month, including December and January, according to specimens in insect museums (Brady S 2009, personal observation; Pulawski WJ 2009, personal observation). Tachysphex alayoi nests from early March through December in the Caribbean Region (Genaro JA 2009, personal observation). Many species of Tachysphex produce successive generations in warmer climates at approximately six weeks intervals (Kurczewski FE, personal observation), leaving open the possibility for multiple generations per year in the Caribbean and Neotropical Regions.

Figure 5.

Relationship between mass of individual prey (wet weight ± SEM) bearing Tachysphex inconspicuus egg and other prey in cell, sorted by sex of prey. Prey on which wasp oviposited was significantly heavier than other prey in cell. High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.eps

Nearly all prey records for species in the obscuripennis group are for the family Blattellidae, regardless of geographic region (Adlerz 1904; Bouwman 1916; Buys 2006, 2007; Callan 1954, 1993; Evans et al. 1976; Elliott et al. 1979; Genaro 2004; Grandi 1928, 1961; Krombein and Pulawski 1994; Maneval 1932; Rau 1933; Vesey-FitzGerald 1956; Williams 1932, 1945; G. Beccaloni 2009, personal observation). Records from the Palearctic Region include the subfamily Ectobiinae of the family Blattellidae. Among the American species, T. inconspicuus apparently stocks its cells with different prey than T. alayoi or T. iridipennis. Tachysphex inconspicuus preys on “canopy indicators” (Fisk 1983) belonging to the genera Chorisoneura and Riatia, both members of the subfamily Pseudophyllodromiinae (Blattellidae) (Buys 2006, 2007; Callan 1954, 1993; Pulawski 1974, 1988; this study). Females fly into the canopy of the tropical wet forest to search for such species and fly from there to their nests with partly paralyzed prey individuals. This prey specialization is underlined by the relatively large percentage (45.5%) of undescribed species provisioned by T. inconspicuus.

Tachysphex iridipennis captures blattellids in the genera Cariblatta, Ischnoptera, and Euthlastoblatta all in the Pseudophyllodromiinae, and perhaps Anaplecta in the Anaplectinae (Pulawski 1988; Rau 1933; Vesey-FitzGerald 1956). Tachysphex alayoi preys upon blattellids in the genera Cariblatta and Symploce (Blattellinae) (Elliott et al. 1979, Genaro 2004). Females of T. alayoi were observed flying from higher vegetation to the ground with partly paralyzed cockroaches (Elliott et al. 1979).

Nearly all observations of prey transport in the obscuripennis group, including all 69 examples observed in T. inconspicuus, indicate that the mainly small cockroaches are carried in flight (Buys 2007; Elliott et al. 1979; Evans et. al. 1976; Maneval 1932; Rau 1933; Williams 1945). Krombein and Pulawski (1994) reported a female of T. drymobius Pulawski in Sri Lanka, 9.5 mm long, flying with an adult male cockroach, 14.0 mm long. This size disparity should have necessitated ground transport. Elliott et al. (1979) noted females of T. alayoi flying with prey 1.98–2.76 times their weight.

The structural adaptations that distinguish species of the obscuripennis group from other Tachysphex may allow them to fly with larger prey. In addition to the tarsal modifications, T. inconspicuus females have a robust thorax for an extensive internal flight musculature and long, broad wings with a greater total surface area than many similar-sized species in the pompiliformis group that practice ground transport. In this regard, species in the obscuripennis group resemble species in the terminatus group that carry their prey in flight (Kurczewski 2009).

The description of females of T. inconspicuus retaining their grasp of the prey with the mandibles and a hindleg, removing the fill from a temporarily closed entrance with the forelegs, and quickly entering the burrow represents atypical behavior among Tachysphex species (Buys 2007; Kurczewski 2010). Tachysphex albocinctus in the albocinctus group, a mantid-hunter (Asis et al. 1989), and T. mediterraneus in the plicosus group, a tree-cricket-hunter (Ferton 1923), exhibit similar nest entry behavior. All three species nest in sandy soils, level the sand removed from burrow excavation, and make a temporary closure of the nest entrance prior to hunting for prey. Most Tachysphex release the prey on the ground before entering their nest.

The field observations of this study and Figure 1 indicate that T. inconspicuus prey are carried to one side of the wasp and perhaps grasped by a hindleg. Holding the cockroach to one side may enable the female to remove the soil from the entrance with the forelegs unimpeded, thereby ensuring a more rapid entry. Such a manner of entry would have positive implications when considering the endless encounters and interactions at the nest between the wasps and foraging ants and cleptoparasitic flies, respectively (Buys 2007, this study).

Tachysphex inconspicuus has a unique combination of structural adaptations on the hindlegs that may be connected with holding the cockroach to one side during nest entry: 1) basal tooth on hindcoxa, 2) slender hindfemur, 3) asymmetrical hindtarsal claws, 4) hindtarsomere IV undulate apicoventrally (its membrane exposed) 5) pronounced mat-like vestiture on ventral hindtarsomere V (Pulawski 1988). Neither T. iridipennis nor T. alayoi has this combination of hindleg adaptations.

The nests of species in the obscuripennis group, including T. inconspicuus, are rather short and shallow (Buys 2007; Evans et al. 1976; Genaro 2004; Maneval 1932; Williams 1945; this study). Nests in loose sandy soil tend to be longer and deeper than nests in compact sandy soil (Buys 2007). Most nests completed by species in the obscuripennis group are single-celled (Buys 2007; Evans et al. 1976; Genaro 2004; this study), but, rarely, two cells are excavated per nest in T. fanuiensis from New Caledonia and Australia (Williams 1945) and T. inconspicuus (this study).

The number of prey cockroaches per fully provisioned cell in species in the obscuripennis group ranges from 1 (T. inconspicuus, this study) to 6 or 7 (T. fanuiensis, Williams 1945). More species complete cells with 2 prey than any other number: T. depressiventris (Evans et al. 1976), T. inconspicuus (Buys 2007; this study), T. alayoi (Genaro 2004), T. fanuiensis (Williams 1932), and T. obscuripennis (Maneval 1932). Completed cells may contain a mix of adult and nymphal cockroaches. There is a preponderance of adult females among the cell provisions of T. inconspicuus, but it is the only species in the group that has been studied sufficiently to draw any conclusions. Nevertheless, sexually reproducing cockroach species generally produce a 1:1 sex ratio (Bell et al. 2007), so the preponderance of adult females and significant under-representation of nymphs suggest that the wasps specifically hunt for the largest Riatia and Chorisoneura. Moreover, four of the prey females carried oothecae. Because females in this physiological state generally forage and feed less than vitellogenic females, T. inconspicuus females may be adept at finding such females in their hiding places.

Hypothetically, cells containing one or two prey and weighing half as much or less than cells with four or five prey are likely to produce male wasps. Cells holding four or five prey and weighing about twice as much, or more than cells with one or two prey probably produce female wasps. Aggregate prey weights of fully provisioned cells indicate that prospective female cells weigh, on average, about twice as much as prospective male cells. Brockmann and Grafen (1989) demonstrated that females of Trypoxylon politum (Crabronidae) stock male cells with less biomass of spiders than female cells. Coville et al. (2000) found that male cells of Trypoxylon vagulum had less prey biomass than female cells, although the numbers of prey spiders were not significantly different.

The eggs of species in the obscuripennis group from all geographic regions are laid obliquely or longitudinally posteriad instead of transversely across the prey's thoracic venter, as in the majority of Tachysphex species (Evans et al. 1976; Genaro 2004; Grandi 1961; Maneval 1932; Williams 1945; this study). Such a placement represents genus-atypical behavior and a possible diagnostic taxonomic character for this species group (Evans et al. 1976; Kurczewski 2010).

The majority of females of T. inconspicuus laid their eggs on the heaviest cockroaches in the cells, in most cases adult females. The wasps show an uncanny ability to make oviposition choices based on the size, weight, or mass of the prey individuals. The example in which a female laid her egg on the smallest prey in the cell (10.1 mg) occurred in the only cell with five cockroaches, the maximal number of prey per cell. Perhaps this wasp had so little space within the cell in which to maneuver she laid her egg indiscriminately on the closest individual.

Mutilation of leg or antennal segments of the cockroach occurs in T. depressiventris (Evans et al. 1976), T. obscuripennis (Grandi 1961), T. alayoi (Genaro 2004), and T. inconspicuus (this study) and may characterize all species in the obscuripennis group. In T. depressiventris, one or more legs are sometimes missing, perhaps related to malaxation of the prey by the wasp for purposes of feeding on hemolymph or possibly the struggle that ensued during capture of the cockroach (Evans et al. 1976).

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the logistic support of the Organization for Tropical Studies, especially David and Deborah Clark. This research was supported in part by NSF grant DEB-7725558 (K. S. Bawa, principal investigator). Frank W. Fisk (deceased), the Ohio State University, identified the prey cockroaches from Costa Rica. George Beccaloni, Natural History Museum in London, UK, identified additional prey of Tachysphex inconspicuus. Sean Brady, Smithsonian Institution; Julio A. Genaro, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Habana, Cuba; and Wojciech Pulawski, California Academy of Sciences, provided information on the seasonal occurrence of species in the Tachysphex obscuripennis species group. Warren E. Steiner, Smithsonian Institution, provided us with information about T. inconspicuus nesting in Guyana. John B. Simeone (deceased), State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, translated Grandi's 1928 and 1961 papers from Italian to English. Julio A. Genaro translated his 2004 paper from Spanish to English. Diane Kiernan, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, analyzed some of the statistical data.

References

1.

G Adlerz . 1904. Lefnadsförhållanden och instinkter inom familjerna Pompilidae och Sphegidae. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 37: 1–181. Google Scholar

2.

JD Asis , SF Gayubo , J Tormos . 1989. Nesting behaviour of three species of Tachysphex from Spain, with a description of the mature larva of Tachysphex tar sinus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Ethology Ecology & Evolution 1 : 233–239. Google Scholar

3.

WJ Bell , LM Roth , CA Nalepa . 2007. Cockroaches: Ecology, Behavior, and Natural History. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar

4.

RM Bohart , AS Menke . 1976. Sphecid Wasps of the World. A Generic Revision. University of California Press. Google Scholar

5.

BE Bouwman . 1916. Sprinkhanen de wespen. De Levende Natuur 19: 1–9. Google Scholar

6.

HJ Brockmann , A Grafen . 1989. Mate conflict and male behavior in a solitary wasp, Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) politum (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Animal Behaviour 37: 232–255. Google Scholar

7.

S Buys . 2006. Description of the last instar larva of Tachysphex inconspicuus (Kirby)(Hymenoptera Crabronidae) in Brazil. Revista Brasiliera de Zoologia 23: 1277–1279. Google Scholar

8.

S Buys . 2007. Comparative study of the nesting behaviour of Tachysphex inconspicuus (Kirby)(Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) in two locations in southeast Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 36: 327–330. Google Scholar

9.

EMcC Callan . 1942. A note on Timulla (Timulla) eriphyla Mickel, a parasite of Tachysphex blatticidus F. X. Williams, from Trinidad. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London (A) 17: 18. Google Scholar

10.

EMcC Callan . 1954. Observations on Vespoidea and Sphecoidea from the Paria Peninsula and Patos Island, Venezuela. Boletin de Entomologia Venezolana 9: 13–27. Google Scholar

11.

EMcC Callan . 1993. Biological notes on some Tachytes and Tachysphex species (Hym., Sphecidae) in Trinidad. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 129: 41–43. Google Scholar

12.

RE Coville , C Griswold , PL Coville . 2000. Observations on the nesting biology and behavior of Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) vagulum (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) in Costa Rica. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 76: 28–48. Google Scholar

13.

NB Elliott , FE Kurczewski . 1985. Nesting and predatory behavior of some Tachysphex from the western United States (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Great Basin Naturalist 45: 293– 298. Google Scholar

14.

NB Elliott , FE Kurczewski , S Claflin , P Salbert . 1979. Preliminary annotated list of the wasps of San Salvador Island, the Bahamas, with a new species of Cerceris (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae, Scoliidae, Vespidae, Pompilidae, Sphecidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 81: 352–365. Google Scholar

15.

HE Evans , RW Matthews , WJ Pulawski . 1976. Notes on the nests and prey of four Australian species of Tachysphex Kohl, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 15: 441–443. Google Scholar

16.

Ch Ferton . 1923. La Vie des Abeilles et des Guêpes. Oeuvres choises, groupées et annotées par Etienne Ribaud et François Picard . Etienne Chiron. Google Scholar

17.

FW Fisk . 1983. Abundance and diversity of arboreal Blattaria in moist tropical forests of the Panama Canal area and Costa Rica. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 108: 479–490. Google Scholar

18.

JA Genaro . 2004. Notas sobre las presas y conducta de nidificación de algunas especies de esfécidos (Hymenoptera: Spheciformes: Crabronidae, Nyssonidae). Cocuyo 14: 18–19. Google Scholar

19.

G Grandi . 1928. Contributi alla conoscenza biologia e morfologia degli Imenotteri melliferi e predatori, VII. Bollettino del laboratorio di Entomologia del R. Istituto Superiore Agrario di Bologna 1: 259–326. Google Scholar

20.

G Grandi . 1961. Studi di un Entomologo sugli Imenotteri superiori. Bollettino dell'Istituto di Entomologia della Università di Bologna 25: 1–659. Google Scholar

21.

KV Krombein . 1979. Superfamily Sphecoidea. In: KV Krombein , PD Hurd Jr., DR Smith , BD Burks , editors. pp. 1573–1740. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Volume 2. Smithsonian Institution Press. Google Scholar

22.

KV Krombein , WJ Pulawski . 1994. Biosystematic studies of Ceylonese wasps, XX: A revision of Tachysphex Kohl, 1883, with notes on other Oriental species (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Larrinae). Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology 552: 1– 106. Google Scholar

23.

FE Kurczewski . 1966. Tachysphex terminatus preying on Tettigoniidae—an unusual record (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae, Larrinae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 39: 317–322. Google Scholar

24.

FE Kurczewski . 2009. Nesting behavior of the Tachysphex terminatus species group (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Northeastern Naturalist 16 (Monograph 3): 1–88. Google Scholar

25.

FE Kurczewski . 2010. Analysis of ecology, nesting behavior, and prey in North American, Central American, and Caribbean Tachysphex (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Northeastern Naturalist 17: (Monograph 6): 1–78. Google Scholar

26.

H Maneval . 1932. Notes recueillis sur les Hymenopteres. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 101: 85–110. Google Scholar

27.

WJ Pulawski . 1971. Les Tachysphex (Hym., Sphecidae) de la région paléarctique occidentale et centrale. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Google Scholar

28.

WJ Pulawski . 1974. A revision of the Neotropical Tachysphex Kohl (Hym.. Sphecidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 44: 3–80. Google Scholar

29.

WJ Pulawski . 1977. A synopsis of Tachysphex Kohl (Hym., Sphecidae) of Australia and Oceania. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 47: 203–332. Google Scholar

30.

WJ Pulawski . 1988. Revision of North American Tachysphex wasps including Central American and Caribbean species. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 10: 1–211. Google Scholar

31.

WJ Pulawski . 2007. The wasp genus Tachysphex Kohl, 1883, of Sahara, SubSaharan Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and Madagascar (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Crabronidae). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences. Fourth Series 58: 1– 698. Google Scholar

32.

WJ Pulawski . 2009. Catalog of Sphecidae sensu lato (=Apoidea excluding Apidae). Available online at:  http://research.calacademy.org/ent/catalog_sp hecidaeGoogle Scholar

33.

P Rau . 1933. The jungle bees and wasps of Barro Colorado Island (with notes on other insects). Published by Phil Rau, Kirkwood, Missouri. Google Scholar

34.

SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.1. Google Scholar

35.

C Schal , J-Y Gautier , WJ Bell . 1984. Behavioural ecology of cockroaches. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 59: 209–254. Google Scholar

36.

DF Vesey-FitzGerald . 1956. Notes on Sphecidae (Hym.) and their prey from Trinidad and British Guyana. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 92: 286–287. Google Scholar

37.

FX Williams . 1914. The Larridae of Kansas. Kansas University Science Bulletin 8: 121– 213. Google Scholar

38.

FX Williams . 1932. The sphegoid wasps of the Marquesas Islands. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 98: 149–153. Google Scholar

39.

FX Williams . 1941. Apparently undescribed Tachysphex (Hymenoptera, Larridae) from Trinidad, B. W. I. The Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Series B. Taxonomy 10: 197–199. Google Scholar

40.

FX Williams . 1945. The Aculeate wasps of New Caledonia, with natural history notes. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 12: 407–452. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Frank E. Kurczewski, Rollin E. Coville, and Coby Schal "Observations on the Nesting and Prey of the Solitary Wasp, Tachysphex inconspicuus, with a Review of Nesting Behavior in the T. obscuripennis species group," Journal of Insect Science 10(183), 1-16, (1 October 2010). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.14143
Received: 17 September 2009; Accepted: 1 February 2010; Published: 1 October 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top