Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 August 2011 Toxicity of Three Insecticides to Lysiphlebus fabarum, a Parasitoid of the Black Bean Aphid, Aphis fabae
Qodratollah Sabahi, Arash Rasekh, J.P. Michaud
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The toxicity of three insecticides to Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae), a parasitoid of Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae), was investigated using IOBC/wprs protocols. Abamectin 1.8 EC, imidacloprid 350 SC, and pymetrozine 25 WP were tested under laboratory conditions at recommended field rates. Immature stages of the parasitoid were exposed to materials by briefly dipping mummified aphids into insecticide solutions/suspensions or water (controls). Abamectin, imidacloprid, and pymetrozine caused 44.8, 58.5, and 14.5% mortality of mummies, respectively. Insecticides were also applied to broad bean foliage until run-off using a hand sprayer and the contact toxicity of residues was investigated after 1, 5, 16 and 30 day periods of outdoor weathering by caging adult wasps on treated plants for 24 h. One day-old residues of abamectin, imidacloprid, and pymetrozine produced 52.5, 90.0 and 57.0% mortality, respectively, and 5 day-old residues produced 28.1, 77.0 and 18.6% mortality. Sixteen day-old residues produced 8.8, 22.4 and 13.6% mortality, whereas 30 day-old residues produced 0.0, 3.2 and 1.1% mortality, respectively. On the basis of these results, abamectin and pymetrozine were classified as short-lived compounds (Class A) and imidacloprid as a slightly persistent compound (Class B).

Introduction

Aphids are an important group of plant pests with high reproductive potential. They inflict both direct and indirect damage to plants by extracting photosynthate and transmitting viruses. The black been aphid, Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is one of the most polyphagous aphid species, exploiting more than 200 leguminous plants and infesting all plant parts (Barnea et al. 2005). In broad bean, Vicia faba L. (Fabales: Fabaceae), growth may be diminished and flowers may abort in response to A. fabae saliva (Nuessly et al. 2004). Apterous virginoparae of A. fabae are able to overwinter in regions with a mild climate, allowing the species to survive without a sexual phase, or holocycle (Aghajanzadeh et al. 1997).

Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) is a specialized parasitoid of A. fabae on both crops and weeds and is ubiquitous in many agroecosystems (Starý 1986; Hildebrand et al. 1997; Völkl and Stechmann 1998; Raymond et al. 2000, Nuessly et al. 2004), including those in northern Iran (Matin et al. 2005). Asexual populations of this parasitoid are known in central Europe (Nemec and Starý 1985) and were recently reported in Iran (Rasekh et al. 2009). Members of the subfamily Aphidiinae complete preimaginal stages inside the body of the aphid (Marulle, 1987; Völkl & Stechmann, 1998; Carver 1989; Starý 1999).

Parasitoids have often been shown to be more sensitive to synthetic insecticides than their hosts. In order to integrate the use of biological control with pesticide applications, synthetic pesticides should be selected for minimal impact on biological control agents. Determination of the compatibility of pesticides with biological control requires information on their direct and indirect toxicity to beneficial species, the pest's economic threshold, and the timing of applications (Stark et al. 2007). Many of the conventional insecticides in current use are broad-spectrum neurotoxins that affect both target and non-target species and, as a result, may disrupt biological control processes (Talebi et al. 2008).

Insecticides commonly used for control of aphids on legume crops in Iran include abamectin, imidacloprid and pymetrozine. Abamectin is a natural fermentation product of the soil bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis and is used to control insect and mite pests of fruit, vegetable and field crops (Lankas and Gordon 1989). Abamectin acts on insects by interfering with neural and neuromuscular transmission (Hayes and Laws 1990). Imidacloprid is a nitroguanidine insecticide that is registered in a variety of formulations (Mullins 1993) and shows excellent activity on a variety of insect pests, including aphids, leafhoppers, plant hoppers, thrips and whiteflies (Elbert et al. 1990, Woodford and Mann 1992). Imidacloprid overstimulates nerve conduction in insects by mimicking the action of the neurotransmitter, acetylcholine (Mullins 1993). Whereas many biological control agents are susceptible to these older insecticides, some newly developed compounds claim to be less toxic to natural enemies. Pymetrozine belongs to a novel pesticide chemistry known as pyridine azomethines. It is highly selective because of a unique mode of action that acts specifically on the salivary pump of sucking insects causing rapid cessation of feeding. It is slow acting, has some translaminar activity, and is generally toxic to aphids and, to a lesser extent, whiteflies (Harrewijn and Kayser 1997).

Standardized methods involving both laboratory and field tests have been developed to test the safety of pesticides to beneficial organisms in accordance with IOBC guidelines (Hassan 1998). The objective of this research was to determine the susceptibility of L. fabarum to abamectin, imidacloprid, and pymetrozine, the insecticides commonly applied against A. fabae in greenhouses.

Materials and Methods

Insect colonies

A thelytokous colony of L. fabarum was established from mummies collected from black bean aphids infesting broad bean in a field in Zanjan Province, Iran, in June 2007. A stock colony of A. fabae was maintained on potted broad bean, V. faba var. Sarakhsi, grown in pots filled with fertilized sawdust in growth chambers set at 20 ± 1° C, 65–75% RH, and a 16:8 L:D photoperiod. The parasitoid was reared on A. fabae feeding on broad bean under the same conditions.

Cohorts of wasps were produced by exposing second instar A. fabae to female wasps in a 5:1 ratio in ventilated plastic cylinders (8.0 cm diameter × 20.0 cm length) for a period of six hours and then transferring the aphids to potted bean plants in a growth chamber until mummies formed about nine days later. Mummies were carefully removed from plants and put in plastic Petri dishes (9.0 cm diameter) until emergence, whereupon each adult female was released into a ventilated plastic cylinder (3.5 cm diameter × 7.0 cm length) provisioned with diluted honey (as droplets on a strip of wax paper) and water (on a cotton roll). The water was replenished daily and the diluted honey every two days. Unless otherwise noted, all females had continuous access to food prior to testing and were used in experiments when they were 72 ± 4 h old without prior exposure to aphids. All experiments were conducted in a walk-in growth chamber.

Insecticides

The insecticides used in this study were commercial preparations of imidacloprid (Bayer Agricultural Products,  www.bayercropscience.com) (350 SC, 40 mg ai per liter), pymetrozine (Syngenta AG,  www.syngenta.com) (25 WP, 150 mg ai per liter), and abamectin (Gyah Corporation, Iran) (1.8 EC 20 mg ai per liter). The insecticides were each dissolved in tap water to produce concentrations equivalent to field rates, assuming an application volume of 400 liters per hectare.

Preimaginal exposure

Broad bean leaves containing around 100 recently mummified aphids each were dipped in each insecticide solution, four leaves per treatment, with tap water used as a control. Treated mummies were then transferred to plastic Petri dishes in a fume hood and allowed to dry for one hour, before being transferred to a rearing room under conditions of 23 ± 1° C and 70 ± 5% RH until emergence of parasitoids approximately seven days later.

Adult exposure

The direct toxicity and persistence of insecticides to three day-old adult wasps was evaluated under semi-field conditions. The insecticides were applied to potted broad bean foliage at the same rates as above using a hand sprayer until run-off and the plants were left exposed to the natural elements outdoors during the aging period. Pots were placed in plexiglass drum-cells (9.0 cm diameter × 5.0 cm height) for exposure of adult parasitoids in a rearing room under the conditions previously described. Ventilation was provided via eight holes (1.0 cm diameter) located around the side of the cage, each covered with fine gauze. Square glass plates (10 cm × 10 cm) were placed above and beneath each cage and 10 female wasps were introduced into each cage. Parasitoids were provided with diluted honey on a dental wick during tests and mortality was evaluated after 24 hours. Three replicates of 12 cages each were performed for each treatment. The cages were maintained in an environmental chamber under the standard rearing conditions.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was arranged in an RCBD design consisting of three replicates per treatment. Treatment mortalities were adjusted for control mortality using Abbott's correction (Abbott 1925). Treatment effects were analyzed using ANOVA and means were separated using Fisher's LSD test (SAS 2001).

Results

Preimaginal exposure

Lysiphlebus fabarum mortality after exposure to imidacloprid, pymetrozine and abamectin in the mummy stage varied significantly among treatments (F = 164.18; df = 2; p < 0.001; Figure 1). According to IOBC standards, pymetrozine was classified as harmless, whereas imidacloprid and abamectin were classified as slightly harmful.

Adult exposure

The mortalities of three day-old L. fabarum females after exposure to residues of the three insecticides on bean leaves weathered for various periods are provided in Table 1. There were significant differences among insecticides in all four post-treatment intervals (one day: F = 110.66, df = 2, p < 0.001; five days: F = 21.48, df = 2, p = 0.007; 16 days: F = 6.38, df = 2, p = 0.047; 30 days: F = 15.03, df = 2, p = 0.014). Notably, imidacloprid caused significantly higher mortality than the other two compounds even after 30 days post-treatment.

Table 1.

Residual toxicity of three pesticides to three day-old Lysiphlebus fabarum females following different post-treatment periods.

t01_01.gif

Figure 1.

Mortality of Lysiphlebus fabarum females after topical exposure to three pesticides in the mummy stage. Means bearing different letters are significantly different (LSD, α = 0.05). High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Discussion

This study showed that both imidicloprid and abamectin were directly lethal to adult L. fabarum, especially 24 hours after application, with imidacloprid causing the highest mortality. These results are comparable to those of Vogt and Ternes (2005) who observed that residual contact with even very low rates of imidacloprid resulted in high mortality of Aphelinus mali (Haldeman) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Pymetrozine was the least toxic among the insecticides tested, a result consistent with the findings of Torres et al. (2003) who concluded that pymetrozine caused negligible mortality of Aphelinus gossypii Timberlake (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae).

The residual toxicity of both abamectin and pymetrozine declined more rapidly with time than did that of imidicloprid. Similarly, Iqbal et al. (1996) found that the residual activity of abamectin against adult male Diadegma semiclausum Hellén (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) declined rapidly when applied to Chinese cabbage at recommended field rates, with no detectable activity remaining two days after application. Likewise, Shipp et al. (2000) reported that the residual toxicity of avermectin b1 to Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) decreased significantly over time under greenhouse conditions.

Mummies of the parasitoid experienced appreciable mortality when exposed to all materials, but pymetrozine was the least toxic. Vogt and Ternes (2005) suggested that thiacloprid did not affect protected stages of A. mali within the woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), even when mummies were directly sprayed, likely due to protection afforded by the host integument. Therefore, when biological control fails to maintain aphids below threshold such that a pesticide application becomes necessary, a portion of the parasitoid population in the mummy stage may experience a functional refuge.

The use of pesticides may cause undesired effects on non-target beneficial organisms and lead to secondary pest outbreaks. To avoid this, the harmful effects of insecticides on natural enemies of the target pest should be minimized, either through careful timing of applications or the use of materials with selective activity. Based on IOBC criteria, imidacloprid would be categorized as slightly persistent, and both abamectin and pymetrozine as short-lived. We may infer that the latter insecticides are relatively compatible with biological control and that their more rapid loss of residual activity may also reduce the risk of exposure for consumers of agricultural goods. Since L. fabarum searches for hosts by walking over plant surfaces and seldom flies, this may increase its exposure to pesticide residues. However, if imidacloprid is applied as granules to the soil, or through chemigation (application in irrigation water), one can avoid direct parasitoid exposure to spray or residues on plant surfaces.

Pymetrozine has been shown to be compatible with the parasitoids Aphelinus abdominalis Dalman (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) when applied against aphids and whiteflies in greenhouses (Sechser et al. 1994). Moura et al. (2010) found that abamectin caused 10% mortality to adults of one population of the lacewing Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and was harmless to those of another population. Abamectin is known to be labile to photo-oxidation in sunlight (Escalada et al. 2008) and pymetrozine was shown to have a half-life of only 3.5 days on broccoli plants (Shen et al. 2008). Thus, both abamectin and pymetrozine can be considered more IPM-compatible compounds than imidacloprid for broadcast application against A. fabae in legume crops.

Acknowledgements

Voucher specimens no. 209 were deposited at the Kansas State University Museum of Entomological and Prairie Arthropod Research. We thank R. Cloyd for reviewing the manuscript.

References

1.

WS Abbott . 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

S Aghajanzadeh , GH Rassoulian , A Rezvani , M Esmaili . 1997. Study on faunistic aspects of citrus aphids in West Mazandaran. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 65: 62–78. Google Scholar

3.

O Barnea , M Mustata , GH Mustata , E Simon . 2005. The parasitoids complex which control the Aphis fabae Scop. colonies installed on different crop species and spontaneous plants. In: Lucrările simpozionuluiEntomofagii şi rolul lor în păstrarea echilibrului natural” Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii “Al. I. Cuza” din Iasi. (Seria Noua) 2005: 99–110. Google Scholar

4.

M Carver . 1989. Biological control of aphids. In: AK Minks , P Harrewijn , Editors. Aphids, their Biology, natural enemies and control , Volume 2C. World Crop Pests. Google Scholar

5.

A Elbert , H Overbeck , K Iwaya , S Tsuboi . 1990. Imidacloprid, a novel systemic nitromethylene analog insecticide for crop protection. In: Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference. pp. 21–28. British Crop Protection Council. Google Scholar

6.

JP Escalada , J Gianotti , A Pajares , WA Massad , F Amat-Guerri , NA García 2008. Photodegradation of the acaricide abamectin: a kinetic study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56: 7355–7359. Google Scholar

7.

P Harrewijn , H Kayser . 1997. Pymetrozine, a fast-acting and selective inhibitor of aphid feeding. Insitu studies with electronic monitoring of feeding behaviour. Pesticide Science 49: 130–140. Google Scholar

8.

SA Hassan . 1998. The initiative of the IOBC/WPRS working group on pesticides and beneficial organisms. In: PT Haskelland , P McEwen , Editors. Ecotoxicology: Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. pp 22–27. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar

9.

WJ Hayes , ER Laws . 1990. Handbook of pesticide toxicology, Classes of pesticides , Vol. 3. Academic Press, Inc. Google Scholar

10.

A Hildebrands , T Thieme , S Vidal . 1997. Host acceptance of different taxa of the Aphis fabae complex in Lysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson and Lysiphlebus fabarum Marshall (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 11: 391–394. Google Scholar

11.

M Iqbal , F Ismail , DJ Wright . 1996. Loss of residual activity of abamectin on foliage against adult hymenopteran parasitoids. BioControl 41: 117–124. Google Scholar

12.

GR Lankas , LR Gordon . 1989. Toxicology. In: WC Campbell , Editor. Ivermectin and Abamectin. Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar

13.

SB Matin , A Sahragard , GH Rasoolian . 2005. Some behavioural characteristics of Lysiphlebus fabarum (Hym: Aphidiidae) parasitizing Aphis fabae (Horn: Aphididae) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Entomology 2: 64–68. Google Scholar

14.

AP Moura , GA Carvalho , VF Moscardini , O Lasmar , DT Rezende , MC Marques . 2010. Selectivity of pesticides used in integrated apple production to the lacewing, Chrysoperla externa. Journal of Insect Science 10.121 available online:  http://insectscience.org/10.121Google Scholar

15.

JW Mullins . 1993. Imidacloprid - a new nitroguanidine insecticide. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 524: 183– 198. Google Scholar

16.

V Nemec , P Starý . 1985. Population diversity in deuterotokous Lysiphlebus species, parasitoids of aphids (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae). Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 82: 170–174. Google Scholar

17.

GS Nuessly , MG Hentz , R Beiriger , BT Scully . 2004. Insects associated with faba bean, Vicia faba (Fabales: Fabaceae), in southern Florida. Florida Entomologist 87: 204–211. Google Scholar

18.

A Rasekh , A Kharazi-Pakdel , JP Michaud , H Allahyari , E Rakhshani . 2009. Report of a thelytokous population of Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) from Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran (in press). Google Scholar

19.

B Raymond , AC Darby , AE Douglas . 2000. Intraguild predators and the spatial distribution of a parasitoid. Oecologia 124: 367–372. Google Scholar

20.

SAS. 2001. SAS Institute Inc., 6th ed, Cary, NC, USA. Google Scholar

21.

B Sechser , F Bourgeois , B Reber , H Wesiak . 1994. The integrated control of whiteflies and aphids on tomatoes in glasshouses with pymetrozine. Medical Faculty Landbouww, University of Gent , 59(2b): 579–583. Google Scholar

22.

G Shen , X Hu , Y Hu . 2008. Kinetic study of the degradation of the insecticide pymetrozine in a vegetable-field ecosystem. Journal of Hazardous Materials 164: 497–501. Google Scholar

23.

JL Shipp , K Wang , G Ferguson . 2000. Residual toxicity of avermectin b1 and pyridaben to eight commercially produced beneficial arthropod species used for control of greenhouse pests. Biological Control 17: 125–131. Google Scholar

24.

JD Stark , R Vargas , JE Banks . 2007. Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. Journal of Economic Entomology 100: 1027–1032. Google Scholar

25.

P Starý . 1986. Specificity of parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) to the black bean aphid Aphis fabae complex in agrosystems. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 83: 24–29. Google Scholar

26.

P Starý . 1999. Biology and distribution of microbe-associated thelytokous populations of aphid parasitoids (Hym.: Braconidae, Aphidiinae). Journal of Applied Entomology 123: 231–235. Google Scholar

27.

K Talebi , A Kavousi , Q Sabahi . 2008. Impacts of pesticides on arthropod biological control agents. Pest Technology 2: 87–97. Google Scholar

28.

JB Torres , C Sherley , A Silva-Torres , JV de Oliveira . 2003. Toxicity of pymetrozine and thiamethoxam to Aphelinus gossypii and Delphastus pusillus. Pesquisa Aropecuaria Brasíliiera 38: 459–466. Google Scholar

29.

H Vogt , P Ternes . 2005. Side effects of pesticides on Aphelinus mali and other antagonists of the woolly apple aphid. In: Proceedings of the IOBC WGPesticides and Beneficial Organisms.” Dçbe, Poland. Google Scholar

30.

W Völkl , DH Stechmann . 1998. Parasitism of the black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) by Lysiphlebus fabarum (Aphidiidae): The influence of host plant and habitat. Journal of Applied Entomology 122: 201–206. Google Scholar

31.

JAT Woodford , JA Mann . 1992. Systemic effects of imidacloprid on aphid feeding behaviour and virus transmission in potatoes. In: Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference, Pests and Diseases. pp. 229–234. Brighton, England. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Qodratollah Sabahi, Arash Rasekh, and J.P. Michaud "Toxicity of Three Insecticides to Lysiphlebus fabarum, a Parasitoid of the Black Bean Aphid, Aphis fabae," Journal of Insect Science 11(104), 1-8, (1 August 2011). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.10401
Received: 16 September 2010; Accepted: 1 December 2010; Published: 1 August 2011
KEYWORDS
abamectin
imidacloprid
persistence
pymetrozine
Vicia faba
Back to Top