Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2011 Studies on the Influence of Host Plants and Effect of Chemical Stimulants on the Feeding Behavior in the Muga Silkworm, Antheraea assamensis
Kartik Neog, Balagopalan Unni, Giasuddin Ahmed
Author Affiliations +

The feeding habits of Antheraea assamensis, Helfer (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) larvae towards the leaves of its four different host plants, Persea bombycina King ex. Hook (Laurales: Lauraceae), Litsea polhantha Jussieu, L. salicifolia Roxburgh ex. Nees and L. citrata Blume, and the chemical basis of feeding preference were investigated. Nutritional superiority of young and medium leaves with respect to soluble protein, total phenol and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity was observed in the leaves of P. bombycina compared to other host plants. Attraction and feeding tests with detached leaves and artificial diet with different chemical stimulants revealed that a mixture of the flavonoids, myrcetin, and 7, 2', 4' trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone with sterol compound β-sitosterol elicited the most biting behavior by A. assamensis larvae. While linalyl acetate alone attracted larvae towards the leaves of the host plants, a mixture of caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde and dodecyl aldehyde was found to both attract them to the host leaves and cause biting behavior. Azaindole was found to deter them from the host plants.


Unique and native to the North Eastern region of India, particularly in the Assam province, the muga silkworm, Antheraea assamensis, Heifer (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) is an economically important insect. The silk that is produced by this insect is highly lustrous and is golden yellow or creamy white in color. The filament length of the cocoon is 500–800 m and the denier is approximately 5.5 (Jolly, et al., 1979). A. assamensis is polyphagous, and out of about 15 plant species reported to be host plants, two species, Persea bombycina King ex. Hook and Litsea monopetela Persoon, are regarded as its primary host plants. Two others, Litsea salicifolia Roxburgh ex. Nees and Litsea citrata Blume, are considered to be secondary host plants. Its other host plants include Actinodaphnae obovata Nees (Blume), A. anquistifolia (Blume) Nees, Cinnamomum glaucescans (Nees) Drury, C. glanduliferum (Wallich) Meisner, Litsea nitida (Roxburgh) Hooker f., all of which belong to Lauraceae family. Tree species rarely eaten by this insect belonging to other families include, Michelia champaca L. (Magnoliaceae) and Magnolia sphenocarpa Hooker f. and Thomson, Celastrus monospermus Roxburgh (Celastraceae); Gmelia arborea Roxburgh (Verbanaceae), Zanthozylum rhesta (Roxburgh) D.C. (Rutaceae); Zizyphus jujuba (Rhamnaceae) etc. (Neog et al. 2006). A. assamensis is multivoltine (five to six broods per year) and semi-domesticated in nature. They are reared outdoors on standing trees. At the end of completion of five larval instars, the larvae crawl down, are collected, and allowed to spin cocoons inside a rearing house.

Phytophagous insects show varying degrees of association with host plants, a particular plant species or group of plants on which they feed (food plant range) (Unni et al. 1996). It is a well-known fact that, for an insect with several host plants, a single plant species may not provide the most beneficial conditions during all parts of the life cycle (Reavey and Lawton 1991, Scheirs et al. 2000, Janz 2002). For example, the best host plant for the larva may not be the best site for the egg or for adult feeding. This preference may vary widely among different host plants of the same family or even among different varieties of the same species (Lederhouse et al. 1992, Janz et al. 2001, Percy et al. 2004, Lopez-Vaamonde et al. 2006). In plant-eating insects where larvae develop on a single host, the ovipositional behavior of adult females determines the larval habitat (Gothard et al. 2005). The relative acceptability of host plants for adult oviposition by herbivorous insects is determined by a balance of numerous internal and external stimulants and deterrents (Miller and Strickler 1984, Bossart and Scriber 1999). External factors may include host plant volatiles, surface chemistry, color, texture, and shape (Rausher 1978, Brown et al. 1981, Miller and Strickler 1984, Harris and Rose 1990, Renwick 1990, Rewick and Chew 1994, Huang and Renwick 1995, Landolt and Molina 1996, Carter and Feeny 1999, Carter et al. 1999, Frankfater and Scriber 1999, 2002).

When an insect is choosing a host-plant, it may use a variety of senses, including smell, sight, touch and taste (Bernays and Chapman 1994). In the first stages of selection, smell and sight are the most important senses because they normally operate at long distances. After the insect lands on a potentially suitable host-plant, touch and taste become more important.

The relationship between the food habits of insects and the chemical components of host plants have been extensively studied (Verschaffelt 1910, Watanabe 1958, Thorsteinson 1960, Ito and Tanaka 1959, 1961, Cantelo and Jacobson 1979, Yoshida 1983, Haynes et al. 1991, Lopez et al. 2000). Host plant selection behavior or feeding preferences are largely mediated by the presence and distribution of secondary metabolites in plants (Frankael, 1959, Lin et al., 1998). These chemicals are classified according to their effect on insect behavior and host-plant selection by insects. Definitions given by Dethier (1960) that are still in use are: attractant, a chemical (volatile) that causes an insect to make orientated movements towards the source of stimulus (plant); repellent, a chemical (volatile) that causes an insect to make orientated movements away from the source (plant) feeding or oviposition; stimulant, a chemical that elicits feeding or oviposition (plant surface compounds); deterrent, a chemical that inhibits feeding or oviposition (plant surface compounds and plant tissues). Flavonoids and related phenolic compounds act as strong feeding deterrents to many insects, but they may act as stimulants for others. (Neilson et al. 1979, McFarlane and Distler 1982, Simmonds 2001, Green et al. 2003). Moreover, chemical stimulants acting at a certain concentration at one receptor of the insect may influence acceptance of the host, while a different concentration of the chemical may cause the insect's central neuron to reject it (Ananthakrishnan, 1991). Choudhury et al. (2006) detected an indole compound azaindole in the leaves of Persea bombycina plants that were not preferred by A. assamensis larvae and reported that feeding on leaves with high azaindole content (0.3–0.5%) produced flimsy cocoons, fewer number of eggs per laying, and an uneven duration of hatching. Even within Lauraceae-specialized butterflies, there are many important differences between plant toxicity of P. bombycina (compared to other Lauraceae species) and different insect species and even populations within the same species (Nitao et al. 1991, Lederhouse et al. 1992). Many specialists on the angiosperms Rutaceae, Magnoliaceae, or Monimiaceae maintained the ability to detoxify the Lauraceae (Scriber et al. 2008, Mercader and Scriber 2008), suggesting that even after millions of years of specialization, behavioral and detoxification abilities still exist for plants that have never been encountered.

There are very few studies on the feeding behavior of A. assamensis with respect to chemical stimuli of its host plants. Hazarika (1994) categorized Machilus (=Persea) bombycina idiotypes into most preferred, moderately preferred and least preferred types and suggested that dodecanal and caryophyllene, present dominantly in the most preferred idiotypes, may play the role of olfactory attractants, enhancing the feeding rate of muga silkworms on these plants. In the present report, we studied the behavior of A. assamensis larvae towards the leaves of different host plants at different maturity levels and also towards different chemicals reported to have stimulatory effects on insects, including B. mori (Ishikawa et al. 1969, Hamamura et al. 1962). Moreover, an attempt was made to induce feeding on an artificial diet fortified with the chemicals by the early instar larvae to test their efficacy.

Materials and Methods

The experimental materials in the present investigation consist of the muga silkworm A. assamensis and its four food plants, Persea bombycina King ex. Hook (Laurales: Lauraceae), Litsea polyantha Jussieu.L. salicifolia Roxburgh ex. Nees and L. citrata Blume. Disease-free A. assamensis eggs were obtained from the Seed Technology Laboratory of Central Muga Eri Research & Training Institute (CMER&TI), Central Silk Board, Govt, of India, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, India. The host plants were maintained in the experimental field of CMER&TI and the silkworms were reared in the experimental field in outdoor conditions following standard procedures (Chakravorty et al. 2005).

Insect behavior in response to leaves of different host plants

Based on morphological and physiological characteristics, the leaves of the host plants were identified as tender, medium, and mature. Tender leaves of all the four host plants were morphologically varying in size, pale green, folded, thin, small in size. The weight of the tender leaves ranged from 0.03 g to 0.17 g for P. bombycina, 0.06–0.60 g for L. polyantha, 0.18–0.51 g for L. salicifolia and 0.09–0.19 for L. citrata. Medium leaves were unfolded, expanding, deep green in color and weighed from 0.230g to 0.650 g for P. bombycina, 0.82–0.96g for L. polyantha, 0.80– 0.85 g for L. salicifolia and 0.70–0.95 for L. citrata. Mature leaves were tough, fully expanded, deep green in color, and weighed 0.03 g to 0.17 g for P. bombycina, 0.06–0.60 g for L. polyantha, 0.18–0.51 g for L. salicifolia and 0.09–0.19 for L. citrata.

One hundred newly hatched A. assamensis larvae were placed at the centre of a circle. P. bombycina, L. polyantha, L. salicifolia and L. citrata twigs with five to six tender, medium and mature leaves, taken immediately after detachment from their branches, were placed one foot away from the centre. The number of larvae settled on the leaves of the different plants was recorded after 60 minutes and this number is expressed as settling percent.

Insect behavior in response to developmentally different leaves of different host plants

The rearing of A. assamensis larvae was conducted to determine growth performance with developmentally different leaves. Three replicates of the tender, semi-mature and mature leaves were maintained. Twenty newly hatched larvae were allowed to feed on different leaf types that were reared up to spinning. The total number of mature larvae that survived out of total larvae brushed during the early stage (1st and 2nd instar), middle stage (3rd and 4th instar) and mature stage (5th instar) was recorded and statistically analyzed.

Estimation of total phenol and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity

The total phenol content in the leaf samples was estimated by the method described by Malick and Singh (1980). PAL activity in the leaves of different host plants was determined according to the method of Sadasivam and Manickam (2005).

Five hundred milligrams of the leaves were homogenized in 10 mL of a cold 25 mM borate-HCl (pH 8.8) buffer containing 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (0.4 mL/L). The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 G for 20 minutes and the supernatant was used as a crude enzyme source. PAL activity in crude enzyme was determined by measuring the conversion of L-phenylalanine to transcinnamic acid spectrophotometrically. The reaction mixture contained 0.5 mL borate buffer (pH 8.7), 0.2 mL enzyme solution, 1 mL 0.1M L-phenylalanine and 1.3 mL water. A control was run in which phenylalanine was added after the addition of trichloroacetic (TCA) acid. Following the incubation for 45 minutes at 32° C, an absorbance of 290 nm was measured after the reaction was stopped with the addition of 1M TCA. Enzyme activity was expressed as nano moles cinnamic acid/min/mg protein. A standard curve was prepared by transcinnamic acid. Total protein in the enzyme extract was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (1951).

Analysis of phenolic compounds

One hundred grams of fresh P. bombycina leaves were crushed in the presence of methanol HCl. After crushing into paste, the content was kept under methanol HCl for 48 hours (<) with intermittent shaking. Then the supernatant was collected after filtration followed by centrifugation (5,000 rmp for 10 minutes). The extract was concentrated and dried to a syrupy material that was treated with 2% aqueous NaOH solution and then extracted with 200 mL petroleum ether (40– 60° C). This was further acidified with diluted HCl and extracted with CH2Cl2. The concentrated organic phase thus obtained was subjected to preparative TLC and compared with standard chemicals for identification.

Biological evaluation of leaf extracts and chemicals for attraction and biting behavior tests

Eggs of A. assamensis or disease-free layings were prepared in the grainage of Central Muga Eri Research & Training Institute, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, Assam, India. A. assamensis,larvae, four to six hours after hatching, with no prior feeding experience, were used for the experiments following the method of Lin et al. (1998) with modifications as described below.

Three pairs of Petri dishes for each of the host plants or standard chemicals were taken and wax coated. Two layers of paper towels and one layer of filter paper (Whatman No. 1) were placed on the dish. The filter papers were soaked with deionized water, which was used to keep the humidity high in each dish. Half pieces of Whatman No. 1 filter paper, 42.5 mm in diameter, were fixed with insect pins for each dish. The discs were then treated with the extracted chemicals or with standard reference chemicals; two discs were treated with solvent control. Ten larvae were placed in the dishes and the number of larvae attracted to or showing biting behavior towards a particular treatment was recorded and expressed as a percent. When larvae showed attraction to or biting behavior towards a particular treatment, their response was considered as positive (+ve), the reverse as negative response (-ve). When it was about 80 percent or more, the response was denoted as highly +ve. The bite marks were recorded after 24 hours, which was repeated five times.

Experiment on feeding with semi-synthetic diet

To test and confirm the effects of the chemicals used for attraction and biting behavior tests, and also for the beginning of feeding with an artificial or semi-synthetic diet, a basic diet was formulated. Several other diet formulations were prepared with the addition of the chemicals showing positive responses in the previous experiments, singly or in combination as shown in Table 1. Six Petri plates were arranged for each diet as in the above experiment. The diets were placed in the plates and five newly hatched larvae were put on top of the diet inside the Petri plates. Their survivability was recorded up to 2nd instar.

Preparation of the diet

The dry ingredients were weighed, blended thoroughly and mixed with water. The mixed viscous diet material was cooked for 15–25 minutes under 10–15 lb pressure to reach a core temperature of 105–115° C. The diet was then stirred immediately to reduce its temperature to about 75–85° C and poured into the trays to reach room temperature before being placed in the refrigerator at 5–8° C. This diet can be preserved at 5–10° C for 20–25 days.

Rearing performance of muga silkworm fed with leaves treated with selected chemicals

The chemicals viz. β-sitosterol, myrcetin, 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone, caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde, dodecyl aldehyde, azaindole and gallic acid, which were found to exhibit attraction, biting behavior or deterrent effects were sprayed three times on the leaves of some plants grown on cement tubs under a shed house covered with nylon nets. The first spray occurred one day before brushing, the second spray occurred during second molt out, and the third occurred during 4th molt out. Three tubs were treated by each chemical and 10 larvae were put in. Rearing was conducted till spinning. Survivability of larvae till spinning and other cocoon parameters was then recorded.


Insect behavior in response to leaves of different host plants

Significant variation was observed in the settling percent, i.e., the behavior of the larvae towards leaves of different maturity levels and different host plants. The silkworms were mostly attracted to the medium leaves of P. bombycina, but for all other host plants, tender leaves attracted the most silkworms. For settling percent, the differences in means between host plants and maturity level and interaction between host plants and maturity were statistically significant (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Settling percent of silkworm larvae with respect to tender (T), medium (Me) and mature (Ma) leaves of different host plants, (1) P. bombycina, (2) L. polyantha, (3) L. salicifolia and (4) L. citrata. High quality figures are available online.


Insect behavior in response to developmentally different leaves of the host plants

Significant variation was observed in the survivability of larvae of different instars when they were fed only with tender, medium or mature leaves of different host plants. When the larvae were reared on tender leaves, survival percent of early instar larvae (1–2 instars) was above 80% for all the host plants and 50–70% during 3rd and 4th instars. However, a drastic reduction in survivability was observed during late 5th instar. A higher mortality rate among early instars was observed when the larvae were fed with mature leaves. On the other hand, medium leaves supported the growth of the larvae at a moderate level and resulted in an overall higher survival percent than tender or mature leaves (Figure 2).

Estimation of total phenol and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity

Significant variation of soluble protein, total phenol, and PAL activity was observed in the leaves of four host plants at three different maturity levels. Tender leaves of L. polyantha contained the highest quantity of soluble protein (17.17 mg/g), tender leaves of P. bombycina contained the highest total phenol (119.79mg/100g), and mature and medium leaves of L. citrata contained the lowest soluble protein (8.86 mg/g), total phenol (15.50 mg/100g). Medium leaves of P. bombycina exhibited the highest PAL activity (4.14 nmole/mg/min), while mature leaves of L. citrata exhibited the lowest (0.96 nmole/mg/min) (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Diagram showing the survival percent of muga silkworms at 1st, 1st-2nd, 2nd, 3rd-4th, 4th, and 5th larval instars fed with different leaf types of (a) P. bombycina, (b) L. polyantha, (c) L. salicifolia and (d) L. citrata. High quality figures are available online.


Analysis of phenolic compounds

From the Methanolic extracts of P. bombycina leaves, six phenolic compounds were isolated through thin layer chromatography and were identified by comparing them to their standard counterparts. The relative quantities of these compounds in the leaves of three different maturity levels are presented in Table 3.

Biological evaluation of chemicals for attraction and biting behavior tests

Muga silkworms showed attraction towards filter papers treated with citral and linalool, but maximum attraction was acheived by linalyl acetate alone, a chemical that attracted more silkworms than a mixture of all three. Caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde, dodecyl aldehyde also showed a highly positive response, but a mixture of all three yielded the highest attraction response (99%). The other chemicals exhibited either deterrent responses (azaindole) or did not have any effect on the muga silkworms. It can be inferred from the experiments that a group of volatile compounds of terpene and aldehyde nature, mainly caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde, dodecyl aldehyde, and linalyl acetate, elicit attraction of muga silkworm towards the leaves of its host plants.

Citral and linalool and linalyl acetate, two chemicals that attracted high numbers of muga silkworms towards the filter paper, did not produce any biting behavior. Beta sitosterol along with myrcetin or 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone showed maximum biting behavior by the muga silkworms as revealed by more than 33 bite markings on the papers treated with these chemicals. Individually, these chemicals did not elicit as much biting behavior as they did in combination. Morin and quercetin did not produce as significant a response for muga silkworms. On the other hand, caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde, dodecyl aldehyde, chemicals that produced positive responses on the attraction test, also produced biting behavior. (Table 4).

Experiment on feeding with semi-synthetic diet

Molting required the least amount of days (4.5 days) for the 1st instar larvae on diets 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20. For the 2nd instar larvae, molting required the least number of days (8.0 days) for larvae on diets 19 and 20. Larvae fed on diet 18, containing azaindole, experienced the longest larval period for both instars (8.6 days for the 1st and 13.6 days for the 2nd instar). The health of the larvae was very poor and only 3% of them (1 out of 30 larvae) survived up to the 2nd instar. Larvae fed with diet 20 reached the maximum 2nd instar larval weight (0.103 g), followed by those fed with diet 10 (0.100 g). The lowest larval weight was recorded for diet 18 (0.020 g) and diet 1 (0.022 g). Diet numbers 20 and 14 could support almost equally the growth of the larvae up to 2nd instar (35.2% and 34.6% survival percent). The larvae spent more than five days in their 1st instar phase and eight days in the 2nd instar phase. Diet numbers 4, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, and 17 supported the growth of more than 20% of the larvae up to 2nd instar (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Diagram showing (a) Days required (b) weight in grams and (c) survival percent of first and second instar larvae of muga silkworm; 21=control outdoor rearing. High quality figures are available online.


Rearing performance of muga silkworm fed with leaves treated with selected chemicals

Significant variation in the number of 5th instar larvae harvested, cocoon weight, shell weight and pupal weight was observed when the silkworms were reared on leaves treated with the selected chemicals. The effect on the number of 5th instar larvae was pronounced in the case of leaves treated with myrcetin (55.00%), 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone (51.20%), caryophyllene (50.0%), gallic acid (50.0%) and dodecyl aldehyde (48.4%). The other parameters also showed large variations under different treatments. The highest male cocoon weight was recorded from larvae fed on caryophyllene-treated plants, the highest female cocoon and shell weight was measured in β-sitosterol-treated plants. The highest male pupal weight was measured in caryophyllene-treated plants and the highest female pupal weight was measured in dodecyl aldehyde-treated plants (Table 5).


The results of the present study suggest that, out of leaves of different host plants belonging to Lauraceae family, the newly hatched A. assamensis were mostly attracted by the medium leaves of P. bombycina compared to all other leaves of different age groups. Medium leaves were mostly preferred as revealed by the feeding behavior and survival rate of the larvae during different instars. Visual field observation of the feeding behavior of the larvae also supported this observation. In their study on the Lauraceae specialist insects Papilio troilus and P. palamedes, Lederhouse et al. (1992) observed highest survival rates and first instar growth rates for P. troilus on Lindera benzoin and P. palamedes on Persea borbonia. On their preferred hosts, lifetime growth rates of both specialist insects were much higher than those of related generalist swallowtails. Lederhouse et al. also argued that the restricted geographic range of P. palamedes appeared to be the result of oviposition preference rather than larval abilities. Maximum survival and cocoon crop production in B. mori was achieved by feeding tender leaves to young larvae (1st -2nd instars), medium leaves to 3rd and 4th instars, and mature leaves to 5th instar larvae (Veda et al. 1997). In the present investigation, it was observed that young larvae fed with mature leaves and vice versa had the lowest survivale rates, suggesting that feeding larvae with leaves of suitable maturity is important for higher survival.

Urzua (2002) reported that the volatile compounds produced by plants can elicit different behaviors in different insect species. For example, camphor acts as a repellent to Harmonia axyridis, the multicolored ladybeetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), but is an attractant for Cicloneda sanguinea and Eriopis connexa. Thorsteinson (1960) confirmed that the mustard oil glycoside, a typical component of cruciferous plants, is responsible for the feeding habits of the larvae of Euproctis similes, a species that feeds only on the leaves of the plants belonging to the family Crucifereae.

In the present investigation, a study of the nutritional value of the leaves of each host plant (i.e., soluble protein, total phenol and PAL activity) revealed substantial variation. Young leaves were nutritionally rich compared to mature leaves, as evidenced by higher soluble protein and total phenol content. But the survival percent of A. assamensis was higher on medium leaves, a fact that may be due to the greater concentration of defense metabolites found in tender and medium leaves, both of which have high fitness and high probability of attack. PAL activity was significantly higher in medium leaves of P. bombycina and L. polyantha compared to other leaves. The flavonoids, myrcetin and 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone showed higher concentration in tender and medium leaves while others showed higher levels in mature leaves. Presence of higher levels of soluble protein, myrcetin and 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone, and PAL enzyme activity can be used as biochemical markers for selecting host plants with leaves of different age groups.

To confirm the role of different phenolic compounds, sterols, and essential oils, attraction, biting and feeding tests were conducted with standard chemicals. These tests indicated that morin and quercetin, that are reported to be factors causing biting behavior of B. mori, did not show such response for muga silkworms. Hamamura et al. (1962) classified citral, linalyl acetate, linalool and terpenyl acetate as attractants; sugars, sitosterol, isoquercetin and morin as biting factors; and cellulose, silicate and phosphate as swallowing factors. In the present experiment, a mixture of myrcetin and 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone with βsitosterol exhibited the highest biting behavior, β-sitosterol is the active compound of the mulberry plant that induces biting behavior from B. mori. In the case of A. assamensis, although β-sitosterol's effect on biting behavior is greatly reduced, the compound's effects become pronounced when it is combined with phenolics. The terpinyl compound linalyl acetate alone can elicit attraction of A. assamensis larvae, while in case of the B. mori, a combination of citral, linalool and linalyl acetate are required for higher attraction behavior. Caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde, dodecyl aldehyde, that showed positive response on the attraction test, also produced biting behavior by the larvae. Feeding of a semi-synthetic diet by first and second larval instars also confirmed the efficiency of these chemicals in effecting attraction, biting behavior and feeding responses by A. assamensis larvae. This information may be useful in creating a diet that is capable of supporting the growth of the larvae up to maturity under indoor conditions. Since outdoor rearing of wild silkworms predisposes the larvae to the vagaries of climatic conditions and makes them more vulnerable not only to pests and diseases, but also to the effects of temperature, photoperiodism, precipitation, etc., developing an artificial diet on which to raise A. assamensis indoors is of great value.

From the above experiments, it can be inferred that a mixture of phenolic compounds myrcetin, 7, 2′, 4′ trimethoxy dihydroxy flavone with sterol compound β-sitosterol will elicit the greatest biting behavior by A. assamensis. While linalyl acetate induces attraction towards leaves of muga host plants, a mixture of caryophyllene, decyl aldehyde and dodecyl aldehyde is the best at inducing attraction of larvae to leaves and induce biting behavior. Thus, the factors responsible for attraction and biting behavior are quite different from that of B. mori.

Table 1.

Composition of the semi-synthetic diet used for attraction and biting behavior experiments.


Table 2.

Variation of biochemical parameters with respect to tender, medium and mature leaves of different host plants.


Table 3.

Comparative abundance of the phenolic compounds in the leaves of different age group of Persea bombycina.


Table 4.

Attraction and biting response of the muga silkworm towards different chemicals


Table 5.

Rearing performance of muga silkworms fed with leaves treated with selected chemicals.



The authors are grateful to Dr. R.K. Rajan, Director, CMER&TI, Jorhat, Assam, India, and Director, NEIST (CSIR), Jorhat, Assam, India, for their encouragement and for providing the laboratory facilities necessary to complete the work. Part of the research work was supported by the Department of Science & Technology Govt of India.



phenylalanine ammonia lyase



TN Ananthakrishnan . 1991. Dimensions of insect plant interactions , pp. 28–29. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd. Google Scholar


EA Bernays , RF Chapman . 1994. Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects , pp. 61–94. Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar


JL Bossart , JM Scriber . 1999. Preference variation in the polyphagous tiger swallowtail butterfly (Lepidoptera; Papilionidae). Environmental Entomology 28: 628–637. Google Scholar


KS Brown Jr. , AJ Damman , P Feeny . 1981. Troidine swallowtails (Lepidopteraa: Papilionidae) in southeastern Brazil: Natural history and foodplant relationships. The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 19: 199–226. Google Scholar


WW Cantelo , M Jacobson . 1979. Phenacetaldehyde attracts moths to bladder flower and to black light traps. Environmental Entomology 8: 444–447. Google Scholar


M Carter , P Feeny . 1999. Host plant chemistry influences choice of the spicebush swallowtail butterfly, Papilio troilus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 1999–2009. Google Scholar


M Carter , P Feeny , M Haribal . 1999. An oviposition stimulant for the spicebush swallowtail butterfly, Papilio troilus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) from leaves of Sassafras albidum (Lauraceaae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 1233–1245. Google Scholar


R Chakravorty , A Barah , K Neog , SAS Rahman , J Ghose . 2005. Package of practices for muga culture. In: Package of practices of Muga, Eri and Mulberry Sericulture for North Eastern Region of India , pp. 1–23. Central Muga Eri Research & Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat. Google Scholar


SN Choudhury , DK Deka , PG Rao . 2006. Role of biochemical constituents of som plant (Persea bombycina) on muga crop production. In: Unni et al., Editors. Proceedings of workshop on Problems and Prospects of muga silkworm seed production , pp. 46–50. Google Scholar


VG Dethier , BL Barton , CN Smith . 1960. The designation of chemicals in terms of the responses they elicit from insects. Journal of Economic Entomology 53: 134–136. Google Scholar


GS Fraenkel . 1959. The raison d'etre of secondary plant substances. Science 129: 1466–1470. Google Scholar


CR Frankfater , JM Scriber . 1999. Chemical basis for host recognition by two oligophagous swallowtail butterflies, Papilio troilus and Papilio palamedes. Chemoecology 9:127–132. Google Scholar


CR Frankfater , JM Scriber . 2002. Oviposition deterrency of redbay (Persea borbonia) leaf extracts to a sympatric generalist herbivore, Papilio glaucus (Papilionidae). Holarctic Lepidoptera 7(2): 33–38. Google Scholar


K Gotthard , N Margraf , M Rahier . 2004. Geographic variation in oviposition choice of a leaf beetle: the relationship between host plant ranking, specificity, and motivation. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 110: 217–224. Google Scholar


K Gotthard , N Margraf , S Rasmann , M Rahier . 2005. The evolution of larval foraging behavior in response to host plant variation in a leaf beetle. OIKOS 109: 503–512. Google Scholar


PWC Green , PC Stevenson , MSJ Simmonds , HC Sharma . 2003. Phenolic compounds on the pod-surface of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan, mediate feeding behavior of Helicoverpa armigera larvae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29(4): 811–821. Google Scholar


Y Hamamura , K Hayashiya , K Naito , K Matsuura and J Nishida . 1962. Food selection by silkworm larvae. Nature 194: 754. Google Scholar


MO Harris , S Rose . 1990. Chemical, color, and tactile cues influencing ovipositional behavior of the Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Environmental Entomology 19: 303–308. Google Scholar


RL Hazarika , JN Baruah , PC Deka , AK Hazarika , JCS Kataky . 1994. Chemical investigation of the essential oil of Machilus bombycina King. Indian Perfumer 36(1): 133– 136. Google Scholar


KF Haynes , JZ Zhao , A Latif . 1991. Identification of floral compounds from Abelia grandiflora that stimulate upwind flight in cabbage looper moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 637–646. Google Scholar


XP Huang , JAA Renwick . 1995. Cross habituation to feeding deterrents and acceptance of a marginal host plant by Pieris rapae larvae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 76: 295–302. Google Scholar


S Ishikawa , T Hirao , N Arai . 1969. Chemoassay basis of hostplant selection in the silkworm. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 12(5): 544–554. Google Scholar


T Ito , M Tanaka . 1959. Per os administration of the nutrients to the silkworm larvae, I. Effect of the administration of glucose solution, Sanshi Shikenjo Hokoku 15: 353–64. Google Scholar


T Ito , M Tanaka . 1961. Per os administration of the nutrients to the silkworm larvae, II. Effect of the administration of various sugars and their nutritive value, Sanshi Shikenjo Hokoku 16: 267–85. Google Scholar


N Janz , K Nyblom , S Nylin . 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 55: 783–796. Google Scholar


N Janz . 2002. Evolutionary ecology of oviposition strategies. In: M Hilker , T Meiners , Editors. Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell. Google Scholar


MS Jolly , SK Sen , TN Sonwalkar , GK Prasad . 1979. Non-mulberry Silks, Part IV, Muga Culture , pp. 122–137. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Google Scholar


PJ Landolt , O Molina . 1996. Host-finding by cabbage looper moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): learning of host odor upon contact with host foliage. Journal of Insect Behavior 9: 899–908. Google Scholar


RC Lederhouse , MP Ayres , JK Nitao , JM Scriber . 1992. Differential use of lauraceous hosts by swallowtail butterflies Papilio Troilus and P. palamedes (Papilionidae). OIKOS 63: 244–252. Google Scholar


S Lin , BF Binder , ER Hart . 1998. Insect feeding stimulants from the leaf surface of Populus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24(11): 1781–1790. Google Scholar


JD Lopez , TN Shaler Jr., KR Beerwinkl , PD Lindgren . 2000. Feeding attractant and stimulant for adult control of noctuid and/or other lepidopteran species, US Patent 6,074,634, Issued June 2000, United States Patent Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar


C Lopez-Vaamonde , N Wikstrom , C Labandeira , HCJ Godfray , SJ Goodman , JM Cook . 2006. Fossil-calibrated molecular phylogenies reveal that leaf-mining moths radiated millions of years after their host plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1314–1326. Google Scholar


OH Lowry , NJ Rosebrough , AL Farr , RJ Randall . 1951. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193: 265–275. Google Scholar


CP Malick , MB Singh . 1980. Plant Enzymology and Histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers. Google Scholar


JE McFarlane , MHW Distler . 1982. The effect of rutin on growth, fecundity and food utilization in Achilus domesticus L. Journal of Insect Physiology 28: 85–88. Google Scholar


RJ Mercader , JM Scriber . 2008. Divergence in the ovipositional behavior of the Papilio glaucus group. Insect Science 15: 361–367, DOI  10.1111/j.1744-7917.2008.00222.xGoogle Scholar


JR Miller , KL Strickler . 1984. Finding and accepting host plants. In: JW Bell , RT Carde , Editors. Chemical Ecology of Insects , pp. 127–158. Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar


JK Neilson , LM Larson , H Soresen . 1979. Host plant selection of horseradish flea beetle Phyllotreta armoraciae (Coleoptera: Chrysomellodae): Identification of two flavonols glycosides stimulating feeding in combination with glucosinolates. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 6: 40–48. Google Scholar


K Neog , SN Gogoi , R Chakravorty . 2006. Present status and constraints of muga silkworm host plant germplasm conservation. In: Non-mulberry Silkworm and Host Plant Germplasm . pp 1–10. Central Muga Eri Research & Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat. Google Scholar


JK Nitao , MP Ayres , RC Lederhouse , JM Scriber . 1991. Larval adaptation to lauraceous hosts: geographic divergence in spicebush swallowtail butterfly. Ecology 72: 1428–1435. Google Scholar


DM Percy , RDM Page , QCB Cronk . 2004. Plant insect interactions: double-dating associated insect and plant lineages reveal asynchronous radiations. Systematic Biology 53: 120–127. Google Scholar


MD Rausher . 1978. Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200: 1071–1073. Google Scholar


D Reavey , JH Lawton . 1991. Larval contribution to fitness in leaf-eating insects. In: WJ Bailey , J Ridsdill-Smith , Editors. Reproductive behavior of insects , pp. 293–329. Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar


JAA Renwick . 1990. Oviposition stimulants and deterrents. In: ED Morgan , NB Mandava , Editors. Mandava Handbook of natural pesticides: Insect attractants and repellants. pp. 151–160. CRC Press. Google Scholar


JAA Renwick , F Chew . 1994. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 39: 377–400. Google Scholar


S Sadasivam , A Manikam . 2005. Biochemical Methods , 2nd edition, pp. 184–186. New Age International Publishers. Google Scholar


J Scheirs , L De Bruyn , R Verhagen . 2000. Optimization of adult performance determines host choice in a grass miner. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 267: 2065–2069. Google Scholar


JM Scriber , ML Larsen , GR Allen , PW Walker , MP Zalucki . 2008. Interactions between Papilionidae and ancient Australian angiosperms: evolutionary specialization or ecological monophagy? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata DOI: 10.1111/j.l570-7458.2008.00691.x  Google Scholar


MSJ Simmonds . 2001. Importance of flavonoids in insect-plant interactions: feeding and oviposition. Phytochemistry 56: 245–252. Google Scholar


AJ Thorsteinson . 1960. Host selection in phytophagous insect. Annual Review of Entomology 5: 193–218. Google Scholar


BG Unni , AC Kakoty , D Khanikar , PR Bhattarcharya , MG Pathak , KPR Pillai , A Choudhury , A Saikia , AC Ghosh . 1996. Lipid and fatty acid composition of muga silkworm, Antheraea assama host plants in relation to silkworm growth. Journal of Lipid Mediators and Cell Signalling 13: 295. Google Scholar


A Urzua . 2002. Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes in the headspace volatiles from intact plants of Pseudognaphalium vira vira, P. heterotrichium, P. cheiranthifolium and P. robustum: their insect repellent function. Bol. Soc. Chil. Quĺm. 47: 099–104. Google Scholar


K Veda , I Nagai , M Horikomi . 1997. Rearing of Silkworms. In: Silkworm Rearing, pp. 172–209 Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. Google Scholar


E Verschaffelt . 1910. The cause determining the selection of food in some herbivorous insects. Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Amsterdam 13: 536–542. Google Scholar


T Watanabe . 1958. Substances in mulberry leaves which attract silkworm larvae (Bombyxmori). Nature 182: 325–26. Google Scholar


T Yoshida . 1955. Recent advances in silkworm nutrition, Bull. Sericult. Expt. Sta., 14(7): 351–426. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Kartik Neog, Balagopalan Unni, and Giasuddin Ahmed "Studies on the Influence of Host Plants and Effect of Chemical Stimulants on the Feeding Behavior in the Muga Silkworm, Antheraea assamensis," Journal of Insect Science 11(133), 1-16, (1 October 2011).
Received: 11 November 2010; Accepted: 1 June 2011; Published: 1 October 2011

Back to Top