Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2014 Effects of Self-Superparasitism and Host Age on Fitness-Correlated Traits in the Solitary Endoparasitoid Wasp Meteorus pulchricornis
Bo Zhang, Baoping Li, Ling Meng
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The domed fitness functions are suggested to describe developmental patterns of progeny parasitoids in relation to host age at oviposition in solitary koinobint parasitoids that are engaged in single parasitism, but few studies have investigated the applicability of the functions as related to superparasitism. The present study was designed to compare fitness functions between single parasitism and superparasitism by examining developmental patterns of Meteorus pulchricornis (Wesmael) (Hymneoptera: Braconidae) progeny in relation to the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), either singly parasitized or self-superparasitized as second—fifth instar larvae. Self-superparasitism caused deleterious effects on the fitness-related traits of parasitoid progeny, as demonstrated by a prolonged egg-to-adult emergence time, a smaller body size, and shorter longevity of the emerging adults, and decreased survival to adult emergence. While the domed fitness function was detected for development time, survival, adult body size, and longevity in relation to host larvae that were singly parasitized, the function was observed only for progeny survival in relation to host larvae that were self-superparasitized. This study suggests that developmental fitness functions with self-superparasitism can deviate from those with single parasitism in solitary koinobiont parasitoids.

Introduction

Among the most important trade-offs faced by organisms is whether to grow larger at the cost of extended development time or to develop more rapidly at the cost of reduced size (Abrams and Rowe 1996). To understand factors influencing offspring development and host selection strategies in parasitoids, the vast majority of studies have focused on the effects of host age, stage, or mass at parasitism on developmental traits in their parasitoids (reviewed by Mackauer and Sequeira 1993; Godfray 1994). The studies observe that the fitness functions differ markedly between (and within) koinobiont and idiobiont parasitoids in response to ecophysiological characteristics of the host species, including host size, growth potential at parasitism, immunity, and feeding ecology (Harvey et al. 2004; Pennacchio and Strand 2006). While a clear-cut host size-parasitoid fitness relationship is recognized for idiobionts, it is not always the case for koinobionts. The relationship between host quality and parasitoid fitness is much more complicated than is the case with idiobionts because it is determined by a range of potentially interacting ecophysiological selection pressures that are less prevalent in the latter group of parasitoids. For koinobionts attacking hosts of limited growth potential relative to maximum parasitoid size, the pattern is similar to that observed in idiobionts (Harvey et al. 1994). In contrast, fitness functions for solitary parasitoids attacking hosts with the potential to grow considerably larger than the adult parasitoid are distinctly dome-shaped (or may even decrease with host size in extreme cases) because progressively larger hosts possess more potent immunological defenses, or else they may be less nutritionally compatible for parasitoid development (and survival) than younger hosts (Strand 2000; Harvey et al. 2004). In the dome-shaped developmental model, fitness for parasitoids is not a linear or increasing function of host size or age at parasitism, but initially increases with host size and then rapidly declines as resources increase beyond the capacity of the parasitoid larva to consume them. The model gains strong support in numerous studies of solitary parasitoids involved in single parasitism (Smilowitz and Iwantsch 1975; Harvey et al. 1994, 1999, 2004; Pandey and Singh 1999; Chau and Mackauer 2001; Elzinga et al. 2003; Harvey et al. 2004; Liu and Li 2006, 2008; Chen et al. 2011), but few studies have yet investigated the applicability of this model to the parasitoids engaged in superparasitism.

As hosts represent a limited discrete resource, superparasitism generally results in reduction in survivorship of larvae and/or size, longevity, and fecundity of emerging adults (Visser et al. 1992; Harvey et al. 1993). However, superparasitism commonly is found not only in the laboratory (van Alphen and Marcel 1990; Bai and Mackauer 1992; Visser et al. 1992; Feuster et al. 1993; Yamada and Miyamoto 1998; Chau and Mackauer 1999), but in the field as well (Janssen 1989; Santolamazza-Carbone and Rivera 2003; Fleury et al. 2004; Jarmillo et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2012). Superparasitism is now generally interpreted as an adaptive strategy in numerous theoretic models and empirical studies (van Alphen and Visser 1990; Visser et al. 1992; Mackauer and Chau 2001; Yamada and Kuzuma 2003; Reynolds and Hardy 2004) or as a result of virus manipulation (Varaldi et al. 2003; Gandon et al. 2006). It is therefore necessary to investigate developmental fitness functions in relation to host age in solitary koinobionts that are engaged in superparasitism so as to fully understand developmental strategies of the parasitoid wasps.

This study was designed to investigate the relationship between fitness-correlated traits of Meteorus pulchricornis (Wesmael) (Hymneoptera: Braconidae) progeny in either singly parasitized or self-superparasitized Spodoptera exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) hosts as second—fifth instar larvae, with the goal of testing whether the domed fitness functions apply to the parasitoid engaged in single as well as selfsuperparasitism. M. pulchricornis has a wide host range of exposed-living lepidopteran larvae (Huddleston 1980; Maeto 1989, 1990) and is a potential biological control agent against some lepidopteran pests (Fuester et al. 1993; Liu and Li 2006; Chau and Maeto 2008; Wu et al. 2008). The host suitability for development of the parasitoid progeny varies with host instars at the time of oviposition (Askari et al. 1977; Liu and Li 2006, 2008). Although foraging parasitoids can avoid selfsuperparasitism on the basis of host movement (Chau and Maeto 2009; Zhang et al. 2012), superparasitism rate still can be as high as 31% in the laboratory (Fuester et al. 1993) and 23% in the field (Zhang et al. 2012).

Materials and Methods

Culture of the parasitoid and host

Meteorus pulchricornis was obtained from S. exigua larvae collected in soybean fields and maintained using S. exigua as host in the insectary (26 ± 2°C, 60%–80% RH, 14L:10D). The parasitoid is thelytokous. The host larvae were reared on an artificial diet (Liu and Li 2006).

Experiment

Spodoptera exigua larvae undergo five instars (designated as L1–L5) before pupation. As the first instar larva was not susceptible to selfsuperparasitism in the exploratory trial (n = 30), it was not used in the experiment. The exploratory trial (n = 50) indicated that females that realized one egg deposition performed a characteristic stinging behavior (flapping wings when withdrawing the ovipositor), which was used to obtain hosts that were either singly parasitized (1 egg) or superparasitized (2 eggs). Host larvae were individually exposed to a parasitoid in a glass vial and continuously observed until they were attacked once (single parasitism) or twice (self-superparasitism). The time interval between the first and second stinging was kept within 30 minutes; within this time, symmetrical competition between offspring larvae can be created in this parasitoid (Chau and Maeto 2008). The host larvae treated above were individually reared on the artificial diet in vials and monitored daily for egression of mature larvae, pupation, and adult emergence of progeny parasitoids. The emerged adults were kept in groups without feeding and hosts until dead, by which longevity was measured. The development time of progeny parasitoids was measured from oviposition to adult emergence (egg-adult emergence time), and the survival from this period was recorded. The right hind tibia length of the adults (a standard measure of body size) was measured under a stereomicroscope. Data were obtained from between 50 and 70 hosts for each parasitism mode/instar combination.

Statistical analysis

Two-way ANOVA was used to compare single parasitism and superparasitism in developmental parameters of offspring parasitoids. Orthogonal polynomial regression was used to analyze the trend in development time, body size, and longevity of offspring according to host stages with either single parasitism or self-superparasitism, with the goal of test on the quadratic term as the manifestation of the domed fitness functions. This regression method can overcome computational difficult ties due to collinearity (Armitage et al. 2002). The Cochran-Armitage test of trend was used to approximately test for departures from a non-monotonic, dome-shaped trend in survival proportions across host stages at oviposition for single parasitism or self-superparasitism. Analyses were carried out using R (R Development Core Team 2009).

Table 1.

Results of orthogonal polynomial regression of life-history traits of Meteorus pulchricornis progeny parasitoids in relation to host instar singly parasitized (A) and self-superparasitized (B) as second—fifth instar larvae.

t01_01.gif

Results

A two-way ANOVA on development time revealed a significant effect of parasitism mode, where offspring parasitoids extended the egg-to-adult emergence time in selfsuperparasitized host larvae as opposed to counterparts in singly parasitized hosts (Figure 1). Orthogonal polynomial regression analysis revealed best fits of a quadratic curvilinear function to the relationship between development time and host stage at both single parasitism and self-superparasitism (Figure 1A, B; Table 1).

Offspring adult parasitoids were significantly smaller in body size, as measured by hind tibia length, in self-superparasitized hosts than in singly parasitized hosts (Figure 1C, D). Where the relationship between body size and host stage at oviposition was best fitted by a quadratic curvilinear function for offspring parasitoids engaged in single parasitism, it was best fitted only by a linear function for the counterparts involved in selfsuperparasitism (Figure 1C, D; Table 1).

Longevity of adults was shortened in selfsuperparasitized hosts as opposed to singly parasitized hosts (Figure 2). Whereas there was a quadratic effect of host stage on longevity of parasitoids engaged in single parasitism, the quadratic effect was close to statistically significant for parasitoids involved in selfsuperparasitism (P = 0.06) (Figure 2A, B; Table 1).

The survival of offspring parasitoids decreased by 15–21% in self-superparasitized hosts as compared to singly parasitized hosts (Figure 3). The Cochran-Armitage test of trend supported the dome-shaped trend in survival proportions across successive host stages at ovipositon for both single parasitism (χ2 = 18.81, P <0.001) and self-superparasitism (χ2 = 4.41, P = 0.04) (Figure 3).

Figure 1.

Meteorus pulchricornis development time (egg-adult emergence) and body size (hind tibia length, HTL) in relation to host instar singly parasitized (A, C) and self-superparasitized (B, D) as second—fifth instar larvae. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Figure 2.

Longevity of Meteorus pulchricornis adults in relation to host instar singly parasitized (A) and self-superparasitized (B) as second—fifth instar larvae. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.jpg

Figure 3.

Percentage survival to adult emergence of Meteorus pulchricornis from hosts singly parasitized (A) and self-superparasitized (B) as second—fifth instar larvae. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.jpg

Discussion

Our experiments show that selfsuperparasitism in M. pulchricornis had deleterious effects on the development of parasitoid progeny, leading to prolonged egg-to-adult emergence time, decreased survival to adult emergence, smaller body size, and shorter longevity of the emerging adults. The results provide data in support of some other studies, which observed that superparasitism in solitary parasitoids delays the development of the progeny (Eller et al. 1990; Harvey et al. 1993; Hegazi and Khafagi 2005; Chau and Maeto 2008; Tunca and Kilinger 2009), increases larval mortality (Vinson and Spoka 1978; Tunca and Kilinger 2009), and results in offspring small in body size (Harvey et al. 1993; Tunca and Kilinger 2009). The fitness costs in development of parasitoid progeny in a superparasitized host are generally assumed to be due to increased competition for limited resources among progeny inside the host (van Lenteren 1981; Waage and Godfray 1986). Moreover, some other competing behaviors may also bear fitness costs for the winning parasitoid. Chau and Maeto (2008) found, in the study of larval competition in M. pulchricornis, that fierce physical fighting between first-instar larvae occurred inside the superparasitized host. However, some fitness costs for progeny parasitoids from superparasitism may be offset. For example, studies of the solitary aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis show that progeny parasitoids are larger in body size in superparasitized aphid hosts than counterparts in singly parasitized aphids without a corre sponding increase in development time (Bai and Mackauer 1992; Mackauer and Chou 2001).

The results of this study show that fitness correlates in development of progeny parasitoids engaged in single parasitism do not linearly increase with host stage at oviposition. The analysis of orthogonal polynomial regression revealed a quadratic effect of host stage on development time, body size, and longevity of progeny parasitoids, respectively; the Cochran-Armitage test on survival proportions showed a dome-shaped trend from L2 to L3 hosts at oviposition. These results provide data in support of the findings not only with this parasitoid parasitizing other host species (Liu and Li 2008), but also with other koinobiont parasitoids that exhibit developmental patterns illustrating clear trade-offs between body size, development time, and pre-adult mortality (Smilowitz and Iwantsch 1975; Harvey et al. 1994, 1999; Pandey and Singh 1999; Chau and Mackauer 2001; Elzinga et al. 2003; Harvey et al. 2004). Such domed fitness functions may be an adaptive response that optimizes several traits affecting parasitoid fitness (Strand 2000).

The domed fitness functions, however, are demonstrated only in parasitoids engaged in single parasitism. There remains a need to know if these functions apply to the parasitoids engaged in superparasitism, in consideration of superparasitism as an adaptive strategy in parasitoids (van Alphen and Visser 1990). The results of this study do not reveal a significantly quadratic function in development time, body size, and longevity of progeny parasitoids engaged in selfsuperparasitism with regard to host stages at oviposition, but support a quadratic trend in survival proportions across successive host stages. The discrepancy in developmental fitness functions between single parasitism and self-superparasitism, as exhibited in M. pulchricornis, may be explained by several factors. The eggs of parasitoids in several families (especially in the Braconidae) produce large cells, teratocytes, which are released to the host haemocoel when the parasitoid first instar ecloses (Dahlman and Vinson 1993). Among other functions, teratocytes have the function of nutrition for developing parasitoid larvae. Bai and Mackauer (1992) reported that larvae of the solitary koinobiont endoparasitoid Aphidius ervi readily feed on them along with host tissues, and that the larger size of progeny emerging from superparasitized hosts compared with singly parasitized hosts may be a result of increased numbers of teratocytes circulating in the haemolymph of superparasitized hosts. Our study also provides some corroborative evidence for this factor. The body size of progeny initially increased with host instar, but rapidly declined when the host at oviposition was the final instar with single parasitism, whereas it linearly increased with host instar at oviposition with self-superparasitism.

Alternatively, the discrepancy may be explained by the same mechanism for the domed fitness functions in single parasitism. Strand (2000) suggested that with single parasitism, offspring fitness initially increases with host size, but as resources increase beyond the capacity of the parasitoid larva to consume them, fitness rapidly declines. We assumed that the resource threshold for the consumption of parasitoid larvae may be higher with self-superparasitism, so as to shift the increasing trend in some life-history traits, such as body size, with host size (or stage) at oviposition. In this respect, self-superparasitism may be an adaptive strategy in solitary koinobionts to exploit suboptimal host stages. This as sumption has gained some support in the study of Microplitis rufiventris, where more parasitoid eggs survive to mature larvae when laid in the sixth-instar larva, the suboptimal stage for single parasitism, than the fifth-instar host, which is the optimal stage for single parasitism (Khafagi and Hegazi 2005; Hegazi and Khafagi 2008). Furthermore, selfsuperparasitism may be enhanced by host sharing in solitary endoparasitoids toward the evolution of gregariousness over time (Riddich 2002; Khafagi and Hegazi 2005). Pexton and Mayhew (2005) reported that competition for hosts may have contributed to the evolution of gregarious development in the braconid genus Aphaereta.

Acknowledgements

We thank Lulu Li, Sheng Sheng, Zhu Yu, and Lu Feng for their help in the study, and the Editor for the valuable comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Natural Science Fund of China (NSFC-30871670) and Special Research Fund for Agricultural Technique for the Public Interests (201103002).

References

1.

PA Abrams , L. Rowe 1996. The effects of predation on the age and size of maturity of prey. Evolution 50: 1052–1061 Google Scholar

2.

P Armitage , G Berry , JNS. Matthews 2002. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Fourth edition. Blackwell Science Ltd. Google Scholar

3.

A Askari , JW Mertins , HC. Coppel 1977. Development biology and immature stages of Meteorus pulchricornis in the laboratory. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 70: 655–659. Google Scholar

4.

B Bai , M. Mackauer 1992. Influence of superparasitism on development rate and adult size in a solitary parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi. Functional Ecology 6: 302–304. Google Scholar

5.

A Chau , M. Mackauer 1999. Selfsuperparasitism in the solitary parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): Proximate mechanisms. Canadian Entomologist 131: 769–777. Google Scholar

6.

A Chau , M. Mackauer 2001. Preference of the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae) for different aphid species: Female choice and offspring survival. Biological Control 20: 30–38. Google Scholar

7.

NNB Chau , K Maeto , 2008. Intraspecific larval competition in Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a solitary endoparasitoid of lepidopteran larvae. Applied Entomology and Zoology 43: 159–165. Google Scholar

8.

N Chau , K. Maeto 2009. Temporary host paralysis and avoidance of selfsuperparasitism in the solitary endoparasitoid Meteorus pulchricornis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 132: 250–255. Google Scholar

9.

W Chen , B Li , L. Meng 2011. Host selection and offspring developmental performances of Meteorus pulchricornis on Spodoptera litura larval instars. Chinese Journal of Ecology 30(7): 1317–1321 (In Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar

10.

DL Dahlman , SB. Vinson 1993. Teratocytes: developmental and biochemical characteristics. In: NE Beckage , SN Thompson , BA Federici , eds. 1993. Parasites and Pathogens of Insects. pp. 145–65. New York: Academic. Google Scholar

11.

FJ Eller , JH Tumlinson , WJ. Lewis 1990. Intraspecific competition in Micropitilis croiceps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Heliothis species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83: 504–508. Google Scholar

12.

JA Elzinga , JA Harvey , A. Biere 2003. The effects of host weight at parasitism on fitness correlates of the gregarious koinobiont parasitoid Microplitis tristis and consequences for food consumption by its host, Hadena bicruris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 108: 95–106. Google Scholar

13.

F Fleury , N Ris , R Allemand , P Fouillet , Y Carton , M. Boulétreau 2004. Ecological and genetic interactions in Drosophila parasitoids communities: a case study with D. melanogaster, D. simulans and their common Leptopilina parasitoids in south-eastern France. Genetica 120: 181–194. Google Scholar

14.

R Fuester , P Taylor , H Peng , K. Swan 1993. Laboratory biology of a uniparental strain of Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an exotic larval parasite of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86: 298–304. Google Scholar

15.

H. Godfray 1994. Parasitoids: Behavior, evolution, and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press (Princeton, N.J.), Princeton. Google Scholar

16.

S Gandon , A Rivero , J Varaldi , 2006. Superparasitism evolution: adaptation or manipulation? The American Naturalist 176: 1–22. Google Scholar

17.

JA. Harvey 2005. Factors affecting the evolution of development strategies in parasitoid wasps: the importance of functional constraints and incorporating complexity. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 117: 1–13. Google Scholar

18.

JA Harvey , MR. Strand 2002. The developmental strategies of endoparasitoid wasps vary with host feeding ecology. Ecology 83(9): 2439–2451. Google Scholar

19.

JA Harvey , IF Harvey , DJ. Thomson 1993. The effect of superparasitism on development of the solitary parasitoid wasp, Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Ecological Entomology 18: 203–208. Google Scholar

20.

JA Harvey , IF Harvey , DJ. Thompson 1994. Flexible larval growth allows use of a range of host sizes by a parasitoid wasp. Ecology 75: 1420–1428. Google Scholar

21.

JA Harvey , TM Bezemer , JA Elzinga , MR. Strand 2004. Development of the solitary endoparasitoid Microplitis demolitor: host quality does not increase with host age and size. Ecological Entomology 29: 35–43. Google Scholar

22.

JA Harvey , MA Jervis , R Gols , NQ Jiang , LEM. Vet 1999. Development of the parasitoid, Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Pieris rapae and Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera:Pieridae): evidence for host regulation. Journal of Insect Physiology 45: 173–182. Google Scholar

23.

E Hegazi , W. Khafagi 2005. Developmental interaction between suboptimal instars of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) and its parasitoid Microplitis rufiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Archives of Insect Biochemistry 60: 172–184. Google Scholar

24.

T. Huddleston 1980. A revision of the western Palaearctic species of the genus Meteorus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology 41: 1–58. Google Scholar

25.

A. Janssen 1989. Optimal host selection by Drosophila parasitoids in the field. Functional Ecology 3: 469–479. Google Scholar

26.

J Jaramillo , C Borgemeister , M. Setamou 2006. Field superparasitism by Phymastichus coffea, a parasitoid of adult coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 119: 231–237. Google Scholar

27.

WE Khafagi , EM. Hegazi 2008. Does superparasitism improve host suitability for parasitoid development? A case study in the Microplitis rufiventris-Spodoptera littoralis system. BioControl 53: 427–438. Google Scholar

28.

Y Liu , B. Li 2006. Developmental interactions between Spodoptera exigua (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) and its uniparental endoparasitoid, Meteorus pulchricornis (Braconidae: Hymenoptera). Biological Control 38: 264–269. Google Scholar

29.

Y Liu , B. Li 2008. Effects of Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae, Lepidoptera) host stages on some developmental parameters of the uniparental endoparasitoid Meteorus pulchricornis (Braconidae, Hymenoptera). Bulletin of Entomological Research 98: 109–114. Google Scholar

30.

M Mackauer , R. Sequeira 1993. Patterns of development in insect parasites. In: NE Beckage , SN Thompson , BA Federici . Editors. Parasites and Pathogens of Insects. pp. 1–20. AcademicPress. Google Scholar

31.

M Mackauer , A. Chau 2001. Adaptive selfsuperparasitism in a solitary parasitoid wasp: the influence of clutch size on offspring size. Functional Ecology 15: 335–343. Google Scholar

32.

K. Maeto 1989. Systematic studies on the tribe Meteorini from Japan (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) VI. The pulchricornis group of the genus Meteorus. Japanese Journal of Entomology 57: 768–777. Google Scholar

33.

K. Maeto 1990. Phylogenetic relationships and host associations of the subfamily Meteorinae cresson (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Japanese Journal of Entomology 58: 383–396. Google Scholar

34.

S Pandey , R. Singh 1999. Host size induced variation in progeny sex ratio of an aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebia mirzai. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 61–67. Google Scholar

35.

F Pennacchio , MR. Strand 2006. Evolution of developmental strategies in parasitic Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 233–258. Google Scholar

36.

JJ Pexton , PJ. Mayhew 2005. Clutch size adjustment, information use and the evolution of gregarious development in parasitoid wasps. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58: 99–110. Google Scholar

37.

R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online:  www.r-project.orgGoogle Scholar

38.

EW Riddick , 2002. Superparasitism occasionally predisposes Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to develop gregariously in Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Entomological Science 37: 1–9. Google Scholar

39.

KT Reynolds , ICW. Hardy 2004. Superparasitism: a non-adaptive strategy? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 347–348. Google Scholar

40.

S Santolamazza-Carbone , CA. Rivera 2003. Superparasitism and sex ratio adjustment in a parasitoid wasp: results at variance with local mate competition? Oecologia 136: 365–373. Google Scholar

41.

Z Smilowitz , GF. Iwantsch 1975. Relationships between the parasitoid, Hyposoter exiguae, and the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni: effects of host age on ovipositional rate of the parasitoid and successful parasitism. Canadian Entomologist 107: 689–694. Google Scholar

42.

M. Strand 2000. Life history variation and developmental constraints in parasitoids. In: M Hochberg , AR Ives , Editors. Population Biology of Parasitoids. pp. 139–162. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar

43.

H Tunca , NE. Kilinger 2009. Effect of superparasitism on the development of the solitary parasitoid Chelonus oculator Panzer (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Turkey Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33: 463–468. Google Scholar

44.

J van Alphen , M. Visser 1990. Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 35: 59–79. Google Scholar

45.

J Varaldi , P Fouillet , M Ravallec , M Lopez-Ferber , M Bouletreau , F. Fleury 2003. Infectious behaviour in a parasitoid. Science 302: 1930. Google Scholar

46.

SB Vinson , P. Spoka 1978. Effects of superparasitism by a solitary endoparasitoid on the host, parasitoid and field samplings. Southwestern Entomologist 3: 299–303. Google Scholar

47.

ME Visser , JJM van Alphen , L. Hemeril 1992. Adaptive superparasitism and patch time allocation in solitary parasitoids: An ESS model. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 93–101. Google Scholar

48.

H Wu , L Meng , B. Li 2008. Effects of feeding frequency and sugar concentrations on lifetime reproductive success of Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biological Control 45: 353–359. Google Scholar

49.

YY Yamada , K. Miyamoto 1998. Payoff from self and conspecific superparasitism in a dryinid parasitoid, Haplogonatopus atratus. Oikos 81: 209–216. Google Scholar

50.

YY Yamada , S. Kazuma 2003. Evidence for adaptive self-superparasitism in the dryinid parasitoid Haplogonatopus atratus when conspecifics are present. Oikos 103: 175–181. Google Scholar

51.

B Zhang , L Huang , L Meng , B. Li 2012. Host discrimination ability and the influencing factors in Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica 54: 1391–1398 (In Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar

52.

B Zhang , L Meng , L Huang , B. Li 2012. Oviposition selection behavior of Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the field. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University 35: 78–82 (In Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Bo Zhang, Baoping Li, and Ling Meng "Effects of Self-Superparasitism and Host Age on Fitness-Correlated Traits in the Solitary Endoparasitoid Wasp Meteorus pulchricornis," Journal of Insect Science 14(103), 1-11, (1 August 2014). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.014.103
Received: 10 August 2012; Accepted: 10 January 2013; Published: 1 August 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top