Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2014 Toxicological and Biochemical Characterizations of AChE in Phosalone-Susceptible and Resistant Populations of the Common Pistachio Psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae
Ali Alizadeh, Khalil Talebi-Jahromi, Vahid Hosseininaveh, Mohammad Ghadamyari
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The toxicological and biochemical characteristics of acetylcholinesterases (AChE) in nine populations of the common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt and Lauterer (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), were investigated in Kerman Province, Iran. Nine A. pistaciae populations were collected from pistachio orchards, Pistacia vera L. (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae), located in Rafsanjan, Anar, Bam, Kerman, Shahrbabak, Herat, Sirjan, Pariz, and Paghaleh regions of Kerman province. The previous bioassay results showed these populations were susceptible or resistant to phosalone, and the Rafsanjan population was most resistant, with a resistance ratio of 11.3. The specific activity of AChE in the Rafsanjan population was significantly higher than in the susceptible population (Bam). The affinity (KM) and hydrolyzing efficiency (Vmax) of AChE on acetylthiocholine iodide, butyrylthiocholine iodide, and propionylthiocholine odide as artificial substrates were clearly lower in the Bam population than that in the Rafsanjan population. These results indicated that the AChE of the Rafsanjan population had lower affinity to these substrates than that of the susceptible population. The higher Vmax value in the Rafsanjan population compared to the susceptible population suggests a possible over expression of AChE in the Rafsanjan population. The in vitro inhibitory effect of several organophosphates and carbamates on AChE of the Rafsanjan and Bam populations was determined. Based on I50, the results showed that the ratios of AChE insensitivity of the resistant to susceptible populations were 23 and 21.7-fold to monocrotophos and phosphamidon, respectively. Whereas, the insensitivity ratios for Rafsanjan population were 0.86, 0.8, 0.78, 0.46, and 0.43 for carbaryl, eserine, propoxur, m-tolyl methyl carbamate, and carbofuran, respectively, suggesting negatively correlated sensitivity to organophosphate-insensitive AChE. Therefore, AChE from the Rafsanjan population showed negatively correlated sensitivity, being insensitive to phosphamidon and monocrotophos and sensitive to N-methyl carbamates.

Introduction

The common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt and Lauterer (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), is a major pest of pistachio, Pistacia vera L. (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae), and is distributed in all pistachio producing areas of Iran (Burckardt and Lauterer 1989; Lauterer 1998; Samih et al. 2005). The A. pistaciae populations are increasing in many countries, including Iran, Turkey, Iraq, Armenia, and Turkmenia, as well as in Mediterranean regions such as Syria and Greece (Burckardt and Lauterer 1989; Burckhardt and Lauterer 1993; Mart et al.1995; Anagnou-Veroniki et al. 2008). Both adults and nymphs suck leaf sap and produce large amounts of white powder consisting of dried honeydew. Direct feeding of the pest causes reduced plant growth, defoliation, stunting, falling of fruit buds, and poor yield (Lababidi 2002). Controlling A. pistaciae requires several insecticide treatments every year due to its short life span and high reproductive potential. Phosalone and amitraz are the insecticides most widely used to control A. pistaciae, although organophosphates, insect growth regulators, neonicotinoids, and pyrethroids have always been used in commercial pistachio orchards (Samih et al. 2005).

Among the organophosphate insecticides, phosalone has been wieldy used against A. pistaciae, and its use is extended to the control of other pistachio pests, especially the pistachio leafhopper, Idiocerus stali Fieb. The resistance of A. pistaciae to phosalone has been pointed out by Telebi et al. (2001) and Alizadeh et al. (2011). The synergists (TPP, PBO, and DEM) effect and activity of detoxifying enzymes (esterases, mixed function oxidases, and glutathione S-transferases) have demonstrated that the resistance to phosalone is mainly caused by esterase detoxification (Alizadeh et al. 2011).

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE; EC 3.1.1.7), which hydrolyzes acetylcholine at the cholinergic synapse to terminating neurotransmission, is the major target site of both organophosphate and carbamate insecticides, which inhibit the enzyme activity by covalently phosphorylating or carbamylating the serine residue within the active site gap (Corbett 1974; Fournier 2005). However, modification of AChE to an insensitive form can be related to the increased AChE activity and has been demonstrated as the most important mechanism providing resistance to the organophosphates and/or carbamates in some pests (Fournier et al. 1992, 1993; Zhu and Gao 1999; Kozaki et al. 2001). The kinetic microplate assay has been confirmed as a fast and accurate way of determining AChE-based resistant genotypes and is important both in the early detection of resistance and in the evaluation of other potential insecticides once this form of resistance has arisen (Zhu and Gao 1999). The aims of the present research were to compare toxicological and biochemical characterizations of AChE among nine field populations of A. pistaciae from Kerman Province, Iran.

Materials and Methods

Nine A. pistaciae populations were collected from pistachio orchards located in Rafsanjan, Anar, Bam, Kerman, Shahrbabak, Herat, Sirjan, Pariz, and Paghaleh regions of Kerman Province, Iran, in the summer of 2009. The populations were routinely reared in plastic boxes (50 × 60 × 80 cm) under greenhouse conditions at 28 ± 2ºC, 45 ± 5% RH, and a 16:8 L: D photoperiod on young, untreated pistachio plants, P. vera (var. Badami Zarandi). The Bam population was used as a reference susceptible population. The Rafsanjan population showed the highest resistance level (11.3) based on bioassay (Alizadeh et al. 2011).

Chemicals

S-butyrylthiocholione iodide (BTC), 5-5´- dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), propionylthiocholine iodide (PTC), aldicarb (98% purity), carbofuran (99.5% purity), carbaryl (99.5% purity), and propoxure (99.6%) were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries ( www.wako-chem.co.jp). Phosphamidon and monocrotophos with 99.9% purity were purchased from Accustandard ( www.accustandard.com). Acetylcholine iodide (ATC), eserine, tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane, Triton X-100, and bovine serum albumin were obtained from Sigma- Aldrich ( www.sigmaaldrich.com).

Enzyme preparation

Two hundred adults of A. pistaciae from each population were homogenized in 300 µL of ice-cold sodium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7, containing 0.1% Triton X-100). The homogenates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g and 4ºC for 10 min. The resulting supernatants were used as the enzyme source in all enzyme assays.

Assay of AChE activities

AChE hydrolytic activities were measured by using ATC as the substrate, as described by Ellman et al. (1961) with some modifications (Mamiya et al. 1961). The total reaction volume per well of a 96-well microtitre plate was 240 µL, consisting of 40 µL supernatant, 40 µL of ATC (1.5 mM) and DTNB (0.3mM), and 20 µL in 140 µL 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The enzyme was pre-incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance was measured continuously every 5 min for 30 min at 405 nm and 37°C using a microplate reader (ELX808, BioTek,  www.biotek.com). The enzyme activities were calculated as described by Yin et al. (2001).

Determination of kinetic parameters of AChE

The apparent Michaelis—Menten constant (KM) and maximal velocity (Vmax) of total AChE from nine populations of A. pistaciae were determined according to Moores et al. (1996) with minor modifications. The activity was monitored continuously for at least 30 min with six different concentrations (0.1, 0.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 µM) of ATC, BTC, and PTC. The detection method was the same as that used for the above activity assays. KM and Vmax values were calculated using the SigmaPlot 10.0 software ( www.sigmaplot.com) for Windows, using the Michaelis—Menten equation according to the method of Wilkinson (1961).

Protein contents assay

The protein content of the enzyme samples was determined following the method of Lowry et al. (1951) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. The measurement was performed at a wavelength of 595 nm.

In vitro inhibition of AChE

To discover whether the evaluated levels of AChE-specific activity present in the Rafsanjan population play a role in resistance to phosalone, eight chemicals from two different classes (organophosphates: phosphamidon, monocrotophos, and paraoxon; carbamates: propoxure, carbaryl, aldicarb, carbofuran, and eserine) were chosen to assess in vitro inhibition of AChE. The enzyme was preincubated with the inhibitor at room temperature for 10 min. After preincubation, the ATC, BTC, and PTC substrates were added to the mixture (containing 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and DTNB). Stock solutions of the inhibitors were prepared in acetone and diluted with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.0), thus the maximum acetone concentration was below 1% in the test solutions. The remaining activity was determined 20 min after the preparation of the reaction mixture. Optical density was measured at 405 nm with a microplate reader (ELX808, BioTek). The insecticide concentration inhibiting 50% of AChE activity (I50) was estimated using a regression- based approach, three parameters sigmoid, or logistical model. Each experiment was carried-out in triplicate. Calculations were performed using SigmaPlot10 and Microsoft Excel ( www.microsoft.com).

Analysis

Data were analyzed by employing ANOVA, and means were compared by Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0.05) using SPSS (IBM,  www.ibm.com).

Results

Assay of AChE activities

The activities of AChE in nine populations were measured with ATC as a substrate, and the results are presented in Table 1. The results indicated that there were significant differences in AChE activities among the populations. The activity of AChE in the Rafsanjan population (the resistant population) was 1.95 fold higher than that of the Bam population (the susceptible population), and after Rafsanjan population, the AChE activity in Kerman and Sirjan populations showed the highest ratio. The rank order of the AChE activity, from the highest to the lowest, was Shahrbabak > Pariz > Anar > Herat > Paghaleh.

Kinetics analysis of AChE

Kinetic parameters of AChE from the nine populations of A. pistaciae to three substrates are shown in Table 2. The rank order from the highest hydrolyzing efficiency to the lowest as expressed by the Vmax value was ATC > PTC > BTC for each population. The KM values of AChE in the resistance population (Rafsanjan) were 2.5, 2.51, and 2.98 fold higher than the susceptible population (Bam) with ATC, BTC, and PTC as substrates, respectively. The AChE of the Bam population (i.e., lower KM value, 0.24 µM) had significantly greater affinity to the substrate ATC than that of the Rafsanjan population (KM=3.4 µM) (P < 0.05). The Vmax value for the Rafsanjan population was 1.5, 1.8, and 1.6 fold higher for ATC, BTC, and PTC, respectively, than that for the Bam population. The catalytic activity of Bam AChE to ATC, BTC, and PTC, as expressed by the Vmax/KM values, indicated that they were significantly greater than the values for the Rafsanjan population (Table 2).

Table 1.

Comparison of AChE activities in nine populations of Agonoscena pistaciae.

t01_01.gif

Table 3.

I50 values of in vitro inhibition of AChE activity in the most phosalone-resistant and susceptible populations of Agonoscena pistaciae.

t03_01.gif

Table 2.

Substrate specificities and kinetic parameters of AChE from susceptible and field populations of Agonoscena pistaciae.

t02_01.gif

In vitro inhibition of AChE

The effects of organophosphates and carbamates on AChE activity from mass homogenates of resistant and susceptible populations were determined, and the results are shown in Table 3. Compared with I50 values for the susceptible population (Bam), the resistant population (Rafsanjan) indicated 23, 21.7, and 1.1 fold resistance to monocrotophos, phosphamidon, and aldicarb, respectively. In contrast, the insensitivity factor of AChE from the Rafsanjan population was 0.86, 0.8, 0.78, 0.46, and 0.43 for carbaryl, eserine, propoxur, m-tolyl methyl carbamate (MTMC), and carbofuran, respectively. These results showed that resistance to phosalone in Rafsanjan population causes simultaneous sensitivity to inhibitors.

Discussion

The relationship between AChE alteration and insect resistance (especially to carbamates and organophosphates) has been investigated in numerous studies (Zhu and Gao 1999; Stumpf et al. 2001; Li and Han 2002; Yu 2006). A preliminary study on metabolic resistance mechanisms to phosalone in field populations of A. pistaciae has been performed by Alizadeh et al. (2011). Their synergism and biochemical experiments demonstrated the involvement of esterase in the phosalone resistance of A. pistaciae. In our current study, toxicological and biochemical characteriza tions of AChE in the common pistachio psyllid revealed that AChE was involved in A. pistaciae resistance. The results showed significant differences in the total AChE activity between the susceptible and the most phosalone-resistant population. However, no significant differences in AChE activity between resistant and susceptible populations were found in several cases (Zhu and Brindley 1990; Tsagkarakou 2002). Many researchers have reported a relationship between insecticide resistance and a decrease in AChE activity (Tang et al.1990; Vontas et al. 2001). In contrast, an increase in the activity of AChE was reported for the resistant strains in some cases (Gao and Zhu 2000; Chai et al. 2007). In the present study, the biochemical characterization studies of AChE from the susceptible and resistant populations indicated higher specific activities of AChE in the Rafsanjan population than in the Bam population. Likewise, northern blot analysis suggested high activity resulting from over expression of AChE in Schizaphis graminum (Zhu and Gao 1999). However, in our study some correlation between the development of resistance and the quantity or quality of AChE in A. pistaciae was observed.

The affinity (KM) and hydrolyzing efficiency (Vmax) are two important kinetic parameters of any enzyme. High KM values of AChE from the resistant population (Rafsanjan) implied that the AChE had lower affinity to all substrates (ATC, BTC, and PTC).The results of our study are similar to those observed from studies on Liposcelis bostrychophila (Chai et al. 2007), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Zhu and Clark 1994), Schizaphis graminum (Gao and Zhu 2001), and Bactrocera dorsalis (Hsu et al. 2008). The Vmax of AChE in the resistant populations may decrease (Raymond et al. 1986; Hsu et al. 2008), increase (Ren et al. 2002; Yu 2006), or remain without significant change (Stumpf et al. 2001). In comparison, the Vmax value of the AChE from the Bam population was significantly lower than that of the Rafsanjan population. The higher Vmax values of AChE in the Rafsanjan population with ATC, BTC, and PTC substrates suggest possible over-expression of this enzyme in the resistant population. A similar phenomenon has also been reported for many other resistant insects (Fournier et al. 1992, 1993; Gao and Zhu 2002). However, kinetic characteristics of AChE between the Bam and Rafsanjan populations of A. pistaciae were different. In the Rafsanjan population, AChE activity, KM, and Vmax for the ATC, BTC, and PTC substrates were nearly two fold higher compared to those from the BA population. This may be due to the alteration of AChE catalytic site (Berrada et al. 1994) in the A. pistaciae resistant population. On the other hand, the difference in kinetic parameters between the Bam and Rafsanjan populations was probably due to the combined results of the insensitive AChE, higher specific activity, and other factors.

Alteration of AChE has been observed with a reduced sensitivity to inhibition by organophosphate and carbamate insecticides in numerous insects and mites (Stumpf et al. 2001; Gao and Zhu 2002; Hsu et al. 2008;). In vitro inhibition assays (I50) showed that AChE from the resistant population had higher sensitivity to carbofuran, MTMC, propoxur, eserine and carbaryl insecticides than AChE from the susceptible population. Therefore, negatively correlated sensitivity was found in the resistant population towards carbofuran and MTMC. So far, the studies on the resistance level and resistance spectrum of A. pistaciae to different insecticides were quite limited. However, negatively correlated sensitivity has also been reported in altered AChE of other insects (Zhu and Clark 1995; Villatte et al. 1999; Ghadamyari et al. 2008).

Anti-resistant insecticides, which are more effective against resistant than susceptible genotypes, have been proposed as an important strategy for insecticide resistance management. The results of our study showed that carbofuran, MTMC, and propoxur were more active against modified AChE of A. pistaciae compared with sensitive AChE. Therefore, we report a modified AChE in Rafsanjan population of A. pistaciae showed negatively-correlated sensitivity, being insensitive to phosphamidon and monocrotophos and sensitive to N-methyl carbamates. Similar results were obtained by Ghadamyari et al. (2008) on pirimicarb resistant population of Myzus persicae. Also, Hama et al. (1980) found that AChE of the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps, has become insensitive to widely used N-methyl carbamates but hypersensitive to N- propyl carbamate compounds. In vivo results of Villatte et al. (1999) showed that a pirimicarb resistant strain of Aphis gossypii was 2.5 fold more susceptible to bendiocarb than a sensitive strain. Therefore, pirimicarb resistant strain of A. gossypii showed negatively correlated cross-resistance to N-dimethyl and N-methyl carbamete (Villatte et al. 1999).

Based on I50, N-methyl carbamete is expected to show high efficiency against the Rafsanjan population. However the effect of other mechanisms (i.e,. esterases, MFO, and GST) should not be ignored (Alizadeh et al. 2011). In most cases, molecular investigations suggested that altered AChEs arise from point mutations in the gene encoding this enzyme, resulting in amino acid substitutions in the AChE catalytic center or near the active site of enzyme (Nabeshima et al. 2003; Cassanelli et al. 2006; Hsu et al. 2006; Kono et al. 2006). This gives the impression that these types of biochemical test will be difficult to develop for individual psylla because of their small size. In conclusion, AChE from the Rafsanjan population had lower affinity to artificial substrates (i.e., ATC, BTC and PTC) and reduced sensitivity to inhibition by phosphamidon and monocrotophos compared with susceptible populations, suggesting that the Rafsanjan population possessed qualitatively modified AChE. Therefore, developments in the molecular characterization of the target AChE gene are needed to advance tests based on molecular biology techniques, especially PCR.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Iran National Science Foundation for financial support of grant No. 86095/40. We are also grateful to the University of Vali-e-Asr Rafsanjan for generous support to do bioassay experiments. We thank Prof. John Vontas, Dr. Evangelia Morou, and Dr. Vasileia Balabanidou from the University of Crete for their help in particular biochemical experiments. We appreciate Thomas Ant from the University of Oxford and Maryam Jamali for editing the manuscript, and thank Ebrahim Salari for collection of field A. pistaciae populations and assistance in rearing.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

ATC

,

acetylcholine iodide

BTC

,

S-butyrylthiocholione iodide

DTNB

,

5-5´-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)

MTMC

,

m-tolyl methyl carbamate

PTC

,

propionylthiocholine iodide

References

1.

A Alizadeh , Kh Talebi , V Hosseininaveh , M. Ghadamyari 2011. Metabolic resistance mechanisms to phosalone in the common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae (Hem.: Psyllidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 101: 59–64 . Google Scholar

2.

M Anagnou-Veroniki , P Papaioannou-Souliotis , E Karanastasi , CN. Giannopolitis 2008. New records of plant pests and weeds in Greece, 1990–2007. Hellenic Plant Protecion Journal 1: 55–78. Google Scholar

3.

S Berrada , D Fournier , A Cuany , TX. Nguyen 1994. Identification of resistance mechanisms in a selected laboratory strain of Cacopsyllid pyri (Homoptera: Psyllidae): altered acetylcholinesterase and detoxifying oxidases. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 48: 41–47. Google Scholar

4.

D Burckardt , P. Lauterer 1989. Systematics and biology of the Rhinocolinae (Homoptera: Psylloidea). Journal of Natural History 23: 643–712. Google Scholar

5.

D Burckhardt , P. Lauterer 1993. The jumping plant-lice of Iran (Homoptera: Psylloidea). Revue Suisse DE Zoologie 100: 829–898. Google Scholar

6.

S Cassanelli , M Reyes , M Rault , GC Manicardi , B. Sauphanor 2006. Acetylcholinesterase mutation in an insecticide-resistant population of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 36: 642–653. Google Scholar

7.

YX Chai , GY Liu , JJ. Wang 2007. Toxicological and biochemical characterizations of AChE in Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 88: 197–202. Google Scholar

8.

JR. Corbett 1974. The Biochemical Mode of Action of Pesticides. Academic Press. Google Scholar

9.

GL Ellman , KD Courtney , V Andres Jr , RM. Featherstone 1961. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterases activity. Biochemical Pharmacology 7: 88–95. Google Scholar

10.

D. Fournier 2005. Mutations of acetylcholinesterase which confer insecticide resistance in insect populations. Chemicobiological Interactions 157: 257–261 Google Scholar

11.

D Fournier , JM Bride , F Hoffman , F. Karch 1992. Acetylcholinesterase: two types of modifications confer resistance to insecticide. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267: 14270–14274. Google Scholar

12.

D Fournier , A Mutero , M Pralavorio , JM. Bride 1993. Drosophila acetylcholinesterase: mechanisms of resistance to organophosphates. Chemico-Biological Interactions 87: 233–238. Google Scholar

13.

JR Gao , KY. Zhu 2000. Comparative toxicity of selected organophosphate insecticides against resistant and susceptible clones of the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 48: 4717–4722. Google Scholar

14.

JR Gao , KY. Zhu 2001. An acetylcholinesterase purified from the greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) with some unique enzymological and pharmacological characteristics. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31: 1095–1104. Google Scholar

15.

JR Gao , KY. Zhu 2002. Increased expression of an acetylcholinesterase gene may confer organophosphate resistance in the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 73: 164–173. Google Scholar

16.

M Ghadamyari , H Mizuno , S Oh , K Talebi , Y. Kono 2008. Studies on pirimicarb resistance mechanisms in Iranian populations of the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Applied Entomology and Zoology 43: 149–157. Google Scholar

17.

JC Hsu , DS Haymer , WJ Wu , HT. Feng 2006. Mutations in the acetylcholinesterase gene of Bactrocera dorsalis associated with resistance to organophosphorus insecticides. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 36: 396–402. Google Scholar

18.

JC Hsu , WJ Wu , DS Haymer , HY Liao , HT. Feng 2008. Alterations of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme in the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis are correlated with resistance to the organophosphate insecticide fenitrothion. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 38: 146–154. Google Scholar

19.

Y Kono , T. Tomita 2006. Amino acid substitutions conferring insecticide insensitivity in Ace-paralogous acetylcholinesterase. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 85: 123–132. Google Scholar

20.

T Kozaki , T Shono , T Tomita , Y. Kono 2001. Fenitroxon insensitive acetylcholinesterases of the housefly, Musca domestica associated with point mutations. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31: 991–997 Google Scholar

21.

MS. Lababidi 2002. Effects of Neem Azal T/S and other insecticides against the pistachio psyllid Agonoscena targionii (Licht.) (Homoptera, Psyllidae) under field conditions in Syria. Journal of Pest Science 75: 84–88. Google Scholar

22.

P Lauterer , T Broumas , S Drosopoulos , C Souliotis , A. Tsourgianni 1998. Species of the genus Agonoscena, pests on Pistacia and first record of A. pistaciae in Greece. Anales del Instituto de la Phytopathology 18: 135–141. Google Scholar

23.

FL Li , ZJ. Han 2002. Purification and characterization of acetylcholinesterase from cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover). Archive Insect Biochemistry Physiology 51: 37–45. Google Scholar

24.

OH Lowry , NJ Rosebrough , AL Farr , RJ. Randall 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193: 265–75. Google Scholar

25.

A Mamiya , Y Ishikawa , Y. Kono 1961. Acetylcholinesterase in insecticide resistant Culex tritaeniorhynchus: characteristics accompanying insensitivity to inhibitors. Applied Entomology Zoology 7: 88–95. Google Scholar

26.

C Mart , L Erkilic , N Uygun , M. Altin 1995. Species and pest control methods used in pistachio orchards of Turkey. Acta Horticulture 419: 379–386. Google Scholar

27.

GD Moores , XW Gao , I Denholm , AL. Devonshire 1996. Characterization of insensitive acetylcholinesterase in the insecticide-resistant cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 56: 102–110. Google Scholar

28.

T Nabeshima , T Kozaki , T Tomita , Y. Kono 2003. An amino acid substitution on the second acetylcholinesterase in the pirimicarbresistant strains of the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 307: 15–22. Google Scholar

29.

M Raymond , D Fournier , JM Bride , A Cuany , JB Berge , M. Magnin 1986. Identification of resistance mechanisms in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culcidae) from Southern France: insensitive acetylcholinesterase and detoxifying oxidases. Journal of Economic Entomology 79: 1452–1458. Google Scholar

30.

XX Ren , ZJ Han , YC. Wang 2002. Mechanisms of monocrotophos resistance in cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Archive Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 51: 103–110. Google Scholar

31.

MA Samih , A Alizadeh , R. Saberi Riseh 2005. Pistachio pests and diseases in Iran and their IPM. Jahad Daneshgahi Press. Google Scholar

32.

N Stumpf , CPW Zebitz , W Kraus , GD Moores , R. Nauen 2001. Resistance to organophosphates and biochemical genotyping of acetylcholinesterases in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 69: 131–142. Google Scholar

33.

Kh Talebi , M Rahmani Moghaddam , S. Moharramipour 2001. Susceptibility of different populations of pistachio psylla Agonoscena pistaciae to phosalone insecticide in Kerman province. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science 32: 495–500. Google Scholar

34.

ZH Tang , RJ Wood , SL. Cammak 1990. Acetylcholinesterase activity in organophosphorus and carbamate resistant and susceptible strains of the Culex pipens complex. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 37: 192–199. Google Scholar

35.

A Tsagkarakou , N Pasteur , A Cuany , C Chevillon , M. Navajas 2002. Mechanisms of resistance to organophosphates in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) from Greece. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 32: 417–424. Google Scholar

36.

F Villatte , D Auge , P Touton , R Delorme , D. Fournier 1999. Negative crossinsensitivity in insecticide-resistant cotton aphid Aphis gossypii Glover. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 65: 55–61. Google Scholar

37.

JG Vontas , N Cosmidis , M Loukas , S Tsakas , J Hejazi , A Ayoutanti , J. Hemingway 2001. Altered acetylcholinesterase confers organophosphate resistance in the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 71: 124–132. Google Scholar

38.

GN. Wilkinson 1961. Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochemical Journal 80: 324–332. Google Scholar

39.

DQ Yin , HJ Jin , HX Yu , LY. Chen 2001. A comparative study on the sensitivity and specificity of cholinesterase and glutathione stransferase in Gammarus pulex L. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology 12: 615–618. Google Scholar

40.

SJ. Yu 2006. Insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase in a field strain of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 84: 135–142. Google Scholar

41.

KY Zhu , WA. Brindley 1990. Acetylcholinesterase and its reduced sensitivity to inhibition by paraoxon in organophosphate resistant Lygus hesperus Knight (Hemiptera: Miridae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 36: 22–28. Google Scholar

42.

KY Zhu , JM. Clark 1994. Purification and characterization of acetylcholinesterase from the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 24: 453–461. Google Scholar

43.

KY Zhu , JM. Clark 1995. Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding acetylcholinesterase in Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 25: 1129–1138. Google Scholar

44.

KY Zhu , JR. Gao 1999. Increased activity associated with reduced sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase in organophosphateresistant green bug, Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Pesticide Science 55: 11–17. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Ali Alizadeh, Khalil Talebi-Jahromi, Vahid Hosseininaveh, and Mohammad Ghadamyari "Toxicological and Biochemical Characterizations of AChE in Phosalone-Susceptible and Resistant Populations of the Common Pistachio Psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae," Journal of Insect Science 14(18), 1-11, (1 February 2014). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.014.18
Received: 14 May 2012; Accepted: 2 October 2012; Published: 1 February 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top