Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2014 Aedes Mosquito Species in Western Saudi Arabia
Masroor Alikhan, Khalid Al Ghamdi, Jazem Abdullah Mahyoub
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Aedes Meigen (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito species populations in the western region of Saudi Arabia, especially in and around Jeddah, are increasing, therefore increasing susceptibility of humans to the dengue virus. An extensive survey was carried out for one year, and four species were identified with the help of different pictorial keys available. The identification was based on morphological characteristics of adult female Aedes mosquitoes.

Introduction

Several mosquito species are of medical importance, but Aedes Meigen (Diptera: Culicidae) species are becoming the most important from a medical point of view all over the world. Aedes species (especially Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus) are vectors of arbo-viruses that infect various vertebrates, including humans. The most common arboviruses spread by Aedes species and infecting humans are the dengue fever virus, yellow fever virus, and chikungunya virus. The Aedes species of Saudi Arabia have been studied by several people, such as Mattingly and Knight (1956), Buttiker (1979, 1981), Wills et al (1985), Abdullah and Merdan (1995), Al Zahrani (2001), Jupp et al (2002), Godsey Jr. et al (2003), Al Kherji (2005), Azzam (2006), and Al Ahmad et al (2011).

Mattingly and Knight (1956) identified three species from the southwest only, namely Aedes aegypti, Aedes arabiensis and Aedes caspius. Buttiker (1979, 1981) did not reported any Aedes species from this region. Wills et al. (1985) recorded Aedes caspius from the eastern part of the country. Abdullah and Merdan (1995) collected only one species, Aedes caspius, from the southwestern region, excluding Jeddah. Al Zaharani (2001) reported only Aedes vittatus from the southern region. Jupp et al (2002) mentioned four species from Jizan (southern part), Aedes vexans arabiensis, Aedes vittatus, Aedes caspius and Aedes caballus. Godsy Jr.et al. (2003) reported Aedes unilineatus from Makkah region. Al Kherji (2005) only collected Aedes caspius from Riyadh. Azzam (2006), Al Ahmad et al (2011), and Mahyoub (2011) reported Aedes caspius and Aedes aegypti from Jeddah.

Figure 1.

Maps of Saudi Arabia showing the distribution of Aedes species in the western region. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

There is no authentic record of Aedes mosquito fauna in the western region of Saudi Arabia. In an effort to better understand the fauna, we performed a comprehensive study of the aedine mosquitoes of the western region. The present work is the result of intensive surveillance for almost one year, from January 2010 to December 2010. The study revealed the presence of four species of Aedes in this region. Some of them have been reported in earlier studies from different parts of Saudi Arabia.

Table 1.

Aedes mosquito species of Western Saudi Arabia, 2010–2011.

t01_01.gif

Material and Methods

Aedes species bite during the day and sometimes early night, and dawn and dusk are the peak biting times (WHO 2008). A thorough sampling was carried out by installing the light traps in various habitats in the western region of the country. Black Hole light traps (Rubicon, Inc.,  www.btglobal.co.kr) were used to attract the adult mosquitoes during the entire period of surveillance. Powered aspirators and flash torches were also used to collect mosquitoes from their different resting places.

Fourteen traps were installed in the city of Jeddah. The other towns selected for the surveillance were Al-Qunfudha, Al Qooz, Al Laith, Adham, Tharibaan, Khalees, Rabiq, and Al Kamil, and two traps were set in each city (Figure 1). Live adult mosquitoes were brought to the laboratory for identification. After keeping them for 25 minutes in the deep freezer for immobilization, the samples were thoroughly searched for Aedes species, which were sorted out species wise and sex wise to determine the male:female ratio. Identification was done on the basis of adult female morphological characters with the help of different standard taxonomic keys and catalogues (Barraud 1934; Knight and Mattingly 1956, 1971; Knight and Stone 1977; Harbach and Knight 1980, 1981; Reinert 2000; Rueda 2004; Azzam 2006).

Results and Discussion

In the present study, four species of Aedes were identified from the western region of Saudi Arabia. Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) was most commonly collected from almost all the locations of Jeddah and other towns. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) caspius (Pallas) was restricted in the regions that are close to sea. The highest number of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) caspius were collected from Bariman and South of Jeddah, and a few specimens were also collected from Rabiq and Al Qooz. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) vexans var. arabiensis (Meigen) was mainly concentrated in Al-Qunfudha and Al-Qooz, but a few specimens were also collected from Jeddah and other areas. Aedes vittatus Bigot was abundantly found in Al-Qooz and Al-Qunfudha. From the city of Jeddah, two female specimens of Ae. vittatus were collected from Um-Salam region only (Table 1).

The most abundant species recorded in the western region was Ae. aegypti (57%), fol lowed by Aedes vexans (28.576%), Ae. vittatus (11.90%), and Ae. caspius (2.477%). Aedes vittatus and Ae. vexans arabiensis have not been reported previously from Jeddah city..

Correct identification of Aedes mosquitoes is necessary for effective control of Dengue fever and other arbo-viral diseases prevalent in this region. A simple guide with the diagnostic features is prepared to identify the Aedes mosquitoes of Western region of Saudi Arabia.

Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti: (Plate I)

  1. Silvery white scales on the head, especially on the vertex.

  2. Clypeus with white silvery scales.

  3. Palpi silvery white at tips.

  4. Scutum with lyre-shaped silvery scale ornamentation.

  5. Mid-femur with white longitudinal stripe from base to tip.

  6. Hind tarsi with conspicuous white basal rings on 1–4 segments.

  7. 5th segment of hind tarsi entirely white.

Aedes (Ochlerotatus) caspius: (Plate II)

  1. White upright scales on the vertex.

  2. Clypeus pale brown.

  3. Palpi with light and dark scales.

  4. Proboscis dark at the tip but light in the middle and at the base.

  5. Scutum golden or fawn colored scales with narrow dorso-central stripes of white scales.

  6. Tarsomeres with rings of pale scales.

  7. Hind tarsomeres with both basal and apical pale rings.

  8. Wings with white and dark scales. Base of costa mostly dark scales, vein ‘R’ with dark and pale white scales.

  9. Abdominal terga with median pale stripes, sometimes entirely pale scales.

Aedes (Aedimorphus) vexans var. arabiensis: (Plate III)

  1. Vertex with yellowish scales.

  2. Palpi brown with pale scales at tips.

  3. Plurae with many white or creamy scales.

  4. Wings with dark scales.

  5. Tarsi speckled with narrow basal pale rings.

Aedes (Aedimorphus) vittatus: (Plate IV)

  1. Silvery white scales on the narrow vertex.

  2. Clypeus with white silvery scales.

  3. Palpi with silvery white tips.

  4. Wings with mainly narrow scales on all veins.

  5. Scutum with three pairs of small round silvery white spots.

  6. Tibiae are dark in color each with white spots and white sub basal white band.

  7. Tarsomeres 1–4 with white bands; fifth tarsomere is fully white.

Keys to the adult Aedes female mosquitoe species of Western Saudi Arabia

1. Clypeus with white scales, mid femur with an anterior white stripe from base to tip; scutum with lyre-shaped silvery scale aegypti

- Clypeus without scales (except A. vittatus), scutum with other markmarkings 2

2. Scutum with three pairs of small, round, white spots; each femora with preapical white ring. Tibiae dark in color, each with white sub-basal band vittatus

- Otherwise marked 3

3. Scutum with golden or fawn color scales with narrow darso-central stripes of white scales. Hind tarsomeres with both basal and apical rings, fifth hind tarsal segment pale, wings with white and dark scales caspius

- Scutum with out darso-central white Stripes 4

4. Hind tarsi with pale rings confind to bases of segments, fifth hind tarsal segment wholly dark. Abdominal terga without median pale stripes vaxans vr. Arabiensis

Plate I.

Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.). High quality figures are available online.

p01_01.jpg

Plate II.

Ochlertotatus (Aedes) caspius (Pallas). High quality figures are available online.

p02_01.jpg

Plate III.

Aedes (Aedimorphus) vexans var . arabiensis (Meigen). High quality figures are available online.

p03_01.jpg

Plate IV.

Aedes (Aedimorphus) vittatus (Bigot.). High quality figures are available online.

p04_01.jpg

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Hani M. Aburas, The Mayor of Jeddah Municipality, who inspired us to conduct this research. We are grateful to Mr. Fahad Al Duqsi and Mr. Fahad Alzhrani for providing the facilities to carry out this work in the laboratory. We are also thankful to all our colleagues and friends for extending their cooperation and help during this work.

References

1.

MAR Abdullah , AI. Merdan 1995. Distribution and ecology of the aquatic mosquito fauna in the South Western Saudi Arabia. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 25(3): 815–883. Google Scholar

2.

AZ Al-Ahamdi , MM. Salem 1999. Entomofauna of Saudi Arabia: General survey of insects reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Part 1: Checklist of insects. Academic Publishing and Press, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA. Google Scholar

3.

Ahmad MA Al , MF Sallam , MA Khuriji , SM Kheir , Hamidian S. Azari 2011. Checklist and pictorial key to fourth instar larvae of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Saudi Arabia. J. Med. Entom. 48(4): 717–737. Google Scholar

4.

MA. Al-Kheerji 2005. Survey and distribution of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) and description of its habitat in Riyadh District, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Master Thesis, King Saud University, Riyadh. Google Scholar

5.

M. Al-Zahrani 2001. Potential of arbovirus vectors in Tihamah area, Saudi Arabia. Thesis, Liverpool University, UK. Google Scholar

6.

MA. Azzaam 2006. A report of the integrated control of the insects carrying Rift Valley Fever Virus in the Kingdom of Saiudi Arabia. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology. Google Scholar

7.

PJ. Barraud 1934. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma Volume V. Family Culicidae. Tribes Megharhinini and Culicini. Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar

8.

F. Beccari 1971. Contributo alla conoseenza Dell‘entomofauna dell’ Arabia Saudia. Riv. Agr. Subtrop. e. Trop. 65: 178–211, 243–258. Google Scholar

9.

W. Buttiker 1979. Insects of medical importance in Saudi Arabia. Proc. Saudi Biol. Soc. 3(Al Hasa Conf.): 239–250. Google Scholar

10.

W. Buttiker 1981. Observations on urban mosquitoes in Saudi Arabia. Fauna of Saudi Arabia 3: 472–479. Google Scholar

11.

MS Godsey Jr. , M Abdel-Mohsin , et al. 2003. First record of Aedes (Stegomyia) unilineatus in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. American Mosq. Control Association 19(1): 84–86. Google Scholar

12.

RE Harbach , KL. Knight 1980. Taxonomists glossary of mosquito anatomy. Plexus Publishing, Inc. Google Scholar

13.

YM. Huang 1972. Contribution to the mosquito fauna of South East Asia. XIV. The subgenus Stegomyia of Aedes in south east Asia I. The scutellaris group of species. Contr. Am. Entomol. Institute 9(1): 1–109. Google Scholar

14.

YM Huang , RA. Ward 1981. A Pictorial Key for the Identification of the Mosquitoes Associated with Yellow Fever in Africa. Mosquito Systematics 13(2): 138–149. Google Scholar

15.

YM. Huang 2002. Pictorial key to the mosquito genera of the world; including subgenera of Aedes and Ochlerotatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Insecta Koreana 19(1): 1–130. Google Scholar

16.

PG Jupp , A Kemp , A Grobbelaar , P Leman , FJ Burt , Ahmed AM Al , Mujalli D Al , Khainees M Al , R. Swanepoel 2002. The 2000 epidemic of Rift valley fever in Saudi Arabia: mosquito vector studies. Med. Vet. Entomol. 16: 245–252. Google Scholar

17.

KL Knight , A. Stone 1977. A catalogue of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera: Culicidae). The Thomas Say Foundation, Entomological Society of America. Google Scholar

18.

JA. Mahyoub 2011. Study of the Seasonal Activity and Dynamic Fluctuation of Medically Important Species of Mosquitoes with Reference to Testing the Susceptibility of the Dominant Species Culex pipiens L. 1758 to some Insecticides in Jeddah. Ph.D. Thesis. Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah- Saudi Arabia. Google Scholar

19.

PF. Mattingly 1952. The sub-genus Stegomyia (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Ethopian Region. I: A preliminary study of the distribution of species occurring in the west African sub region with notes on taxonomy and bionomics. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Entomol.) 2(5): 233–304. Google Scholar

20.

PF Mattingly , KL. Knight 1956. The mosquito of Arabia, I. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Ent.) 4(3): 89–141. Google Scholar

21.

PF. Mattingly 1971. Contributions to the mosquito fauna of south-east Asia XII. Illustrated keys to the genera of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute 7(4): 1–84. Google Scholar

22.

JF. Reinert 2000. New classification for the composite genus Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae): elevation of subgenus Ochlerotatus to generic rank, reclassification of the other subgenera, and notes on certain subgenera and species. Journal of the Mosquito Control Association 16: 175–188. Google Scholar

23.

LM. Rueda 2004. Pictorial keys for the identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) associated with Dengue virus transmission. Zootaxa 589: 1–60. Google Scholar

24.

WM Wills , WL Jakob , DB Francy , RE Oertley , E Anani , CH Calisher , TP. Monath 1985. Sindbis virus isolations from Saudi Arabian mosquitoes. Trans. Roy. Soc. Of Trop. Med. Hyg. 79: 63–66. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Masroor Alikhan, Khalid Al Ghamdi, and Jazem Abdullah Mahyoub "Aedes Mosquito Species in Western Saudi Arabia," Journal of Insect Science 14(69), 1-7, (1 May 2014). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.014.69
Received: 16 July 2012; Accepted: 4 March 2013; Published: 1 May 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top