Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2015 An Evaluation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Performance on Different Plant Leaves Based on Life History Characteristics
Wei-Di Li, Peng-Jun Zhang, Jing-Ming Zhang, Zhi-Jun Zhang, Fang Huang, Ya-Wei Bei, Wen-Cai Lin, Yao-Bin Lu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

To compare the performance of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and native Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom) on cucumber and tomato leaves in laboratory, life history characters were investigated, and life tables were constructed using the method of age-stage, two-sex table life. Compared with tomato leaf, there were shorter total preoviposition period (TPOP), higher fecundity, longer female longevity, and higher intrinsic rate of increase (r) of both F. occidentalis and F. intonsa on cucumber leaf. Meanwhile, on cucumber leaf, the shorter TPOP, higher fecundity, longer female longevity, and higher value of r were found on population of F. intonsa but on tomato leaf which were found on population of F. occidentalis. From above, cucumber leaf was the preference to population development of both F. occidentalis and F. intonsa compared with tomato leaf. Nevertheless, on cucumber leaf, population of F. intonsa would grow faster than that of F. occidentalis, which was the opposite on tomato leaf. As to the population development in fields, much more factors would be taken into account, such as pollen, insecticide resistance, and effects of natural enemies etc.

The western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), was first described in California in 1895, and since the 1970s, it had invaded much of the world and became dominant population in most of the areas where it had been introduced (Kirk and Terry 2003, Morse and Hoddle 2006).

F. occidentalis has a wide host-plant range including more than 250 species of vegetables and ornamental crops (Zhi et al. 2005). Even though F. occidentalis is prevalent in flowers (Salguero Navas et al. 1991a, Riley and Batal 1998), it can also be found on crop foliage (Todd et al. 1995, Joost and Riley 2004) and fruit (Salguero Navas et al. 1991b), which reduce photosynthetic capacity (Shipp et al. 2000) and cause fruit surface dimpling. F. occidentalis also transmitted plant virus, such as tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV), chrysanthemum stem necrosis virus (CSNV), groundnut ring spot virus (GRSV), and tomato chlorotic spot virus (TCSV) (Riley et al. 2011). Meanwhile, F. occidentalis is considered to be the predominant vector of TSWV worldwide (Peters et al. 1996, Sherwood et al. 2000), a serious virus for wide range of crop and noncrop hosts and causes billions economic losses worldwide (Prins and Goldbach 1998, Riley et al. 2011).

In China, F. occidentalis was first found in 2003 in Beijing (Zhang et al. 2007) and then has caused serious damage in several provinces (Lu et al. 2011). In some area, F. occidentalis occurred with native Frankliniella intonsa, the predominant thrips population in horticultural ecosystems (Gai et al. 2011). F. occidentalis has replaced Thrips tabaci as the dominant species in European greenhouses (van Rijn et al. 1995) and has also been implicated in the displacement of F. intonsa in Turkey (Atakan and Uygur 2005) and the displacement of Frankliniella gemina (Bagnall) in Argentina (de Borbon et al. 2006). However, F. occidentalis has failed to replace of Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) as the dominant species in the eastern United States (Salguero Navas et al. 1991a, Reitz 2002, Reitz et al. 2003, Paini et al. 2007, Northfield et al. 2008) and in central and southern Florida where Frankliniella bispinosa (Morgan) dominates (Childers et al. 1990, Hansen et al. 2003, Frantz and Mellinger 2009).

Life history characteristics were the important factors leading an organism being a successful invader (Morse and Hoddle 2006). In this study, we investigated the life-history characteristics of F. occidentalis and native F. intonsa on cucumber and tomato leaves, which are the important vegetables in greenhouse around year and was to evaluate the population growth of these two thrips species and the invasion ability of F. occidentalis.

Materials and Methods

Insects and Plants. Population of F. occidentalis was originated collected from melon Cucumis melo L. in a greenhouse at the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, in Beijing 2007, then was mass reared with fresh bean pods in the climate room with 27 ± 1°C and 16 h light photoperiod. Population of F. intonsa was collected from the vegetable flowers in Hangzhou suburb field and then was mass reared in laboratory as the method of F. occidentalis in another climate room.

Commercial cucumber (Cucumis sativus (L.), zhexiu203) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculintum (Mill.), hezuo903) were planted in greenhouse with regular management of fertilizer and water, and no pesticides were applied. Fresh leaves were collected for experiments.

Development and Juvenile Survival. Cohorts of eggs were obtained by allowing about 300 female adults to oviposit on leaves of cucumber and tomato for 8 h. Then, each leaf was transferred into one plastic Petri dish (40 by 15 mm) covered with Parafilm (Bemis Company INC, Neenah, WI) membrane to prevent larvae from escaping, the leaf was observed with 12 h interval until eggs hatched. Once the newly hatched larvae emerged, they were individually transferred into the new plastic Petri dish with new leaf disk (1-cm diameter). As eggs are laid inside the leaf tissue and not visible, the duration of the egg stage was recorded from eggs laid to larvae emerged.

The juveniles of both thrips were observed every day until died or matured, and the leaf disks were changed daily to keep the fresh diet for larvae. Juvenile stages of two thrips were divided as first-instar larva, second-instar larva, prepupa, and pupa. The morphology of second instar was determined from the individual size, and the molted skin of the first instar, prepupa was determined with their short wing sheaths and erect antennae, and pupa has long wing sheaths almost reaching the end of the abdomen with the antennae is bent backwards along the head. The experiment was conducted in the growth chambers with 27 ± 1°C, 16 h light photoperiod, and 65 ± 5% relative humidity (RH).

Oviposition and Adult Survival. Newly emerged female and male adults were paired in glass bottles (30 by 40 mm), and one leaf disk was offered to every couple daily. The replaced disc was individually transferred into the new Petri dish for another 5 d cultivation until all eggs hatched, and the spawned larva were counted as the daily offspring of each female adult because of the difficulty to detecting eggs in plant tissue. If any individual died earlier than its mate, a replacement would be supplied from the mass rearing colony, and the data of these recruited individuals were excluded from analysis.

Life Tables. The raw data were analyzed based on the theory of the age-stage, two-sex life table (Chi and Liu 1985, Chi 1988). The mean of the development periods for each development stage, the longevity for adult female and male, the adult preoviposition period (APOP), the total preoviposition period (TPOP), and the female fecundity of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were calculated. The age-specific survival rate (Lx) and the age-specific fecundity (Mx) were calculated from the daily records of the survival and fecundity of all individuals in the cohort. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) was estimated by using the iterative bisection method from the Euler—Lotka formula: with age indexed from 0.

e01_00.gif

The finite rate λ is calculated as λ = er. The net reproductive rate is the total offspring that an individual can produce during its life time. The mean generation time (T) is defined as the time that a population needs to increase by a factor of fi01_00.gif as the stable age-stage distribution and the stable increase rate (i.e., r and λ) are reached. Tire formula for R0 and T is as follows:

e02_00.gif

The gross reproductive rate (GRR) was calculated as GRR = ΣMx. An analysis of the raw data and an estimation of the life table parameters were performed with a user-friendly computer program, TWOSEX-MSChart (Chi 2009). This program is available at  http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/Twosex-MSChart.zip.

Statistical Analysis. One-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test (SAS Institute 2005) were used to test for significant difference in development times of each stages, APOP, TPOP, adult longevity, fecundity, and population life-table parameters including the intrinsic rate of increase (r), the net reproduction (R0), the finite rate (λ), the mean generation time (T), and the GRR were compared with bootstrap technique (Huang and Chi 2012).

Results

Development and Juvenile Survival. The immature stages period of two thrips on different plant leaves were stated in Table 1. On cucumber leaf, total development time from egg to adult of F. occidentalis was longer than that of F. intonsa, and the development time was about 5 d longer in F. occidentalis compared with F. intonsa, the longer immature development time was caused by the longer egg period, second-instar period, and pupa period. On tomato leaf, the development time from egg to adult of two thrips was not significant different, though the longer egg period but the shorter second-instar period of F. occidentalis.

Table 1.

Mean (±SE) preadult stages (d) of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa on different plant leaves

t01_00.gif

As for F. occidentalis, there was no difference on the total development time from egg to adult between cucumber leaf and tomato leaf, though the shorter period of egg and first instar, but longer period of second instar in cucumber leaf. For F. intonsa, the development time from egg to adult is shorter on cucumber leaf than that on tomato leaf, which was caused by the shorter first instar, second instar, and pupa period on cucumber leaves (Table 1).

Because the eggs invisibly developed in the tissues of plants, the survival rate of preadult of two thrips was recorded only from the newly hatched larvae to the emergence of adult, and they were 86.4% and 91.8% on tomato and cucumber plants, respectively, for F. occidentalis and were 87.1% and 100% for F. intonsa.

Adult Longevity and Reproduction. In cucumber, the female longevity of F. intonsa was about 2.5 d longer than that of F. occidentalis, meanwhile, the time of the APOP and the TPOP of F. intonsa were shorter than that of F. occidentalis, and the time of TPOP was about 6 d shorter in F. intonsa. Although there was no significant difference, the fecundity per F. intonsa was more than that per F. occidentalis in all their life time. In tomato, there were all not significant different in adult longevity, APOP and TPOP, but the fecundity per F. occidentalis was more than that of F. intonsa.

For different plant leaves, adult longevity of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa and male longevity of F. intonsa were longer in cucumber leaf than in tomato leaf. APOP of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa and TPOP of F. intonsa were all shorter in cucumber leaf than in tomato leaf. Moreover, the fecundity of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were both more in cucumber leaf than in tomato leaf, which was high to 17 times of F. intonsa (Table 2).

The age-specific survival rate (Lx) is the probability that an egg will survive to age x. The pattern of Lx curves of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were similar on cucumber and tomato leaves, they began to sharply declined at 10 d (F. intonsa in cucumber leaf) or15 d (F. occidentalis and F. intonsa in tomato leaf and F. occidentalis in cucumber leaf) from the age 0 of egg stage, the decline time was relative to the immature stage period of two thrips on two plant leaves. The area of Lx curves surround from time of adult emergence of F. intonsa in cucumber leaf was larger of F. occidentalis and was larger of F. occidentalis in tomato leaf. These mean the longer female longevity of F. intonsa in cucumber leaf and F. occidentalis in tomato leaf.

The age-specific fecundity (Mx) was the number of offspring by one female every day. From Mx curves, it was shown that the time began to oviposit of two thrips were earlier on cucumber leaf than on tomato leaf, and the Mx values of both thrips were higher on cucumber leaf than that on tomato leaf, especially the peak value was 4.7 and the average value was 1.4 in F. intonsa on cucumber leaf but were 1.1 and 0.4 on tomato leaf. On the other hand, the Mx values of F. occidentalis were higher all over the female life time than that of F. intonsa on tomato, and the reproduction period was 5 d longer in F. occidentalis females, on cucumber leaf; however, the Mx values were higher in F. intonsa and the time began to oviposition of F. intonsa was 5 d earlier than on tomato leaf (Fig. 1).

Table 2.

Longevity and fecundity of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa adults on different plant leaves

t02_00.gif

Fig. 1.

Age-specific survival rate (Lx) and age-specific fecundity (Mx) of F. occidentalis (A) and F. intonsa (B) in tomato leaf and in cucumber leaf (F. occidentalis (C) and F. intonsa (D)).

f01_00.jpg

Life Table Parameters. Life table parameters of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa on different plants were listed in Table 3. Intrinsic rate of increase (r), net reproductive rate (R0), finite rate of increase (λ), and GRR of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were significant higher on cucumber leaf than on tomato leaf, but the generation time (T) was the opposite. The more obvious difference was on the values of r, R0, and GRR of F. intonsa between two plant leaves, e.g., they were 0.21, 25.35, and 44.33, respectively, on cucumber leaf but only 0.01, 1.42, and 6.35 on tomato leaf. As to different thrips, there were higher r, R0, λ, and GRR values and lower T value of F. intonsa than that of F. occidentalis on cucumber leaf, but it was the opposite on tomato leaf, especially on the r, R0, and GRR, which were 0.10, 10.28, and 27.78 of F. occidentalis but only 0.01, 1.42, and 6.35 of F. intonsa as mentioned above.

Discussion

Performance of insect (including development, longevity, and oviposition) depends on the quality of food (BrΦdsgaard 1987, Brodbeck et al. 2002). The faster developmental rates and the higher fecundity of insects indicate a better suitability of a host plant (van Lenteren and Noldus 1990). Life history characteristics of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were investigated on cucumber and tomato leaves.

Immature duration of F. occidentalis was similar on cucumber and tomato leaves, which were 14.53 and 14.38, respectively. Soria and Mollema (1995) reported the duration from egg to adult of F. occidentalis ranged from 12.6 to 17.8 d on susceptible and resistant cucumber genotypes, the result 14.53 in this study was within the range above, and the similar duration 12.39 d was also found in F. occidentalis on cucumber leaf, but the shorter duration 9.22 d was found by Zhang et al. (2007), the difference may caused by the cucumber genotypes. The result 14.38 d on tomato leaf was the similar as 12.91 d on tomato leaf on Zhang et al. (2007). For F. intonsa while, the immature duration was shorter on cucumber than on tomato and the difference was caused by the duration of the second instar. The duration of the second instar was the most vulnerable by different plants, it was found that the second instar duration ranged from 4.3 to 9.1 d according the resistance of cucumber genotypes and which also resulted in prolonged developmental period of F. occidentalis on the resistant genotypes (Soria and Mollema 1995). Moreover, the duration of preadult of F. intonsa was shorter than that of F. occidentalis on cucumber leaf in this study, which also was mainly caused by the duration of the second instar. For immature development, the cucumber leaf and tomato leaf were similar suitable to F. occidentalis and F. intonsa with similar duration from egg to adult.

Table 3.

Life table parameters (mean ± SE) of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa on different plants leaves

t03_00.gif

Higher fecundity, longer female longevity, shorter APOP, and TPOP were found on cucumber leaf compared with tomato leaf, this means that cucumber leaf was more suitable for reproduction of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa, on cucumber leaf, it is also reported that cucumber leaf was more suitable for reproduction of F. occidentalis than tomato leaf with higher fecundity and shorter APOP (Zhang et al. 2007). As to different thrips, there were different suitable of two plant leaves for them, i.e., there were higher fecundity, longer female longevity, shorter APOP, and TPOP of F. occidentalis on tomato leaf and that is the opposite on cucumber leaf, this means that compared with F. occidentalis, the population of F. intonsa would develop faster on cucumber leaf, but population of F. occidentalis would develop faster on tomato leaf. It is reported that food quality and different leaf morphology, affected the adult longevity, adult behavior during oviposition, and the rate of egg hatching (Scott Brown et al. 2002, Zhang et al. 2007), thus the performance of adult and offsprings may affected by food quality and leaf morphology of two plants.

As the intrinsic rate of increase (r) is a reflection of many factors, such as fecundity, survival, and generation time, it adequately summarizes the physiological qualities of an animal in relation to its capacity to increase. Therefore, it is the most appropriate index to evaluate performance of an insect on different host plants and the host plant's suitability on different herbivores (Smith 1989, Southwood and Henderson 2000, Murai 2001, Wang et al. 2011).

The r value of F. occidentalis was 0.10 on tomato, which was the same as the result of Zhang et al. (2007), on cucumber, it was 0.14 of F. occidentalis, which was the similar to the result of the value of F. occidentalis on cucumber leaf (van Rijn et al. 1995) but was lower than the value of 0.3 in Gaum et al. (1994) and 0.21 in Zhang et al. (2007), the reason may be the different genotypes of cucumber (Soria and Mollema 1995) or the difference of experiment temperature, which was 27° C on the experiment of Gaum et al. (1994). As the results of history characteristics, on cucumber leaf, the r value of F. intonsa was higher compared with F. occidentalis and which was higher of F. occidentalis on tomato leaf. The higher intrinsic rate of increase value integrated with the higher fecundity and the shorter development period of preadult, the lower mortality, and the shorter TPOP (Jha et al. 2012).

In this study, the r value of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa was higher on cucumber leaves than that on tomato leaves, especially for F. intonsa, which is low to 0.01 on tomato leaf, this means the not suitable of tomato leaf for population development, but slowly population development would be improved in fields when added with pollens as reported in F. occidentalis (Gerin et al. 1999, Hulshof et al. 2003, Zhi et al. 2005).

Although the important effect of pollens on individual growth and population development of flower visiting thrips, such as F. occidentalis (Hulshof et al. 2003, Riley et al. 2011), plant leaves also offered sufficient nutrition when flower were scare, e.g., F. occidentalis caused severe damage on the seedling stages and young leaves (Olson et al. 2006), and in laboratory, the intrinsic rate of F. occidentalis on cucumber leaf were 0.3 in Gaum et al. (1994) and 0.21 in Zhang et al. (2007) as was 0.21 of F. intonsa in cucumber in this study which mean the suitability for population development of thrips. The plant leaves also be used to evaluate the performance of F. occidentalis on different plants and performance of F. occidentalis compared with other thrips such as F. bispinosa (Northfield et al. 2011) and T. tabaci (van Rijn et al. 1995) on the same plant. However, the effects of pollens on life history character should be done in the future experiments to know the comprehensive influence of plants on different thrips.

Although the important of life history characteristics on biological invasion, the pesticide resistance, host range, symbiotic virus, and other competitive mechanism also influenced successfuil invasion and outburst (Reitz 2009). For example, in spite of the disadvantage of history parameters compared with indigenous species T. tabaci (van Rijn et al. 1995), F. occidentalis invaded successfully into the Europe and displaced T. tabaci become the dominate species, whereas F. occidentalis appears to be competitively excluded by the native F. tritici of eastern states of the United States because of the biotic resistance (Paini et al. 2008), further, even if the inferior competitor of F. bispinosa with F. occidentalis on adult reproduction, F. bispinosa still established dominance over F. occidentalis in Florida because of climate or natural enemy (Northfield et al. 2011). The performance of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa depend on the kind of host plant, so more work about the performance of these two thrips on different important economical plants also should be done in the future, to evaluate the invasion of F. occidentalis.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (201103026) from Ministry of Agriculture of China.

References Cited

1.

E. Atakan , and S. Uygur . 2005. Winter and spring abundance of Frankliniella spp. and Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysan., Thripidae) on weed host plants in Turkey. J. Appl. Entomol. 129: 17–26. Google Scholar

2.

B. V. Brodbeck , J. Funderburk , J. Stavisky , P. C. Andersen , and J. Hulshof . 2002. Recent advances in the nutritional ecology of Thysanoptera, or the lack thereof, pp. 145–153. In R. Marullo and L. Mound (eds.), Thrips and tospoviruses. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Thysanoptera, CSIRO Entomology, Reggio Calabria, Italy. Google Scholar

3.

H. F. BrΦMsgaard 1987. Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)—a new pest in Danish glasshouses. Tidsskrift foer planteavl 93: 83–91. Google Scholar

4.

H. Chi 1988. Lite-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rate among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 17: 26–34. Google Scholar

5.

H. Chi 2009. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, twosex life table analysis. (  http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/TwosexMSChart.zip ). Google Scholar

6.

H. Chi , and H. Liu . 1985. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bulletin of Institute of Zoology Academy Sinica 24: 225–240. Google Scholar

7.

C. C. Childers , R. J. Beshear , J. R. Brushwein , and H. A. Denmark . 1990. Thrips (Thysanoptera) species, their occurrence and seasonal abundance on developing buds and flowers of Florida citrus. J. Entomol. Sci. 25: 601–614. Google Scholar

8.

C. M. de Borbon , O. Gracia , and R. Piccolo . 2006. Relationships between tospovirus incidence and thrips populations on tomato in Mendoza, Argentina. J. Phytopathol. 154: 93–99. Google Scholar

9.

G. Frantz , and H. C. Mellinger . 2009. Shifts in western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), population abundance and crop damage. Fla. Entomol. 92: 29–34. Google Scholar

10.

H. T. Gai , J. R. Zhi , and M. Sun . 2011. Effect of temperature on the survival and fecundity of Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 38: 521–526 (in Chinese). Google Scholar

11.

W. G. Gaum , J. H. Giliomee , and K. L. Pringle . 1994. Life history and life tables of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera, Thripidae), on English cucumbers. Bull. Entomol. Res. 84: 219–224. Google Scholar

12.

C. Gerin , T. H. Hance , and G. V. Impe . 1999. Impact of flowers on the demography of western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 123: 569–574. Google Scholar

13.

E. A. Hansen , J. E. Funderburk , S. R. Reitz , S. Ramachandran , J. E. Eger , and H. McAuslane . 2003. Within-plant distribution of Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in field pepper. Environ. Entomol. 32: 1035–1044. Google Scholar

14.

Y. B. Huang , and H. Chi . 2012. Assessing the application of the jackknife and bootstrap techniques to the estimation of the variability of the net reproductive rate and gross reproductive rate: a case study in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Agric. Forest 61: 37–45. Google Scholar

15.

J. Hulshof , E. Ketoja , and L. Vanninen . 2003. Life history characteristics of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber leaves with and without supplemental food. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 108: 19–32. Google Scholar

16.

R. K. Jha , H. Chi , and L. C. Tang . 2012. A Comparison of artificial diet and hybrid sweet com for the rearing of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on life table characteristics. Environ. Entomol. 41: 30–39. Google Scholar

17.

H. Joost , and D. G. Riley . 2004. Sampling techniques for thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in pre-flowering tomato. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1450–1454. Google Scholar

18.

W.D.J. Kirk , and L. Terry . 2003. The spread of the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Agrie. Forest Entomol. 5: 301–310. Google Scholar

19.

Y. B. Lu , Z. J. Zhang , Q. J. Wu , Y. Z. Du , H. R. Zhang , Y. Yu , E. D. Wang , M. H. Wang , M. Q. Wang , X. L. Togn , et al. 2011. Research progress of the monitoring, forecast and sustainable management of invasive alien pest Frankliniella occidentalis in China. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 48: 488–496 (in Chinese). Google Scholar

20.

J. G. Morse , and M. S. Hoddle . 2006. Invasion biology of thrips. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 67–89. Google Scholar

21.

T. Murai 2001. Development and reproductive capacity of Thrips hawaiiensis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its potential as a major pest. Bull. Entomol. Res. 91: 193–198. Google Scholar

22.

T. D. Northfield , D. R. Paini , J. E. Funderburk , and S. R. Reitz . 2008. Cycles of Frankliniella spp. thrips abundance on north Florida uncultivated reproductive hosts: predicting possible sources of pest outbreaks. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101: 769–778. Google Scholar

23.

T. D. Northfield , D. R. Paini , S. R. Reitz , and J. E. Funderburk . 2011. Within plant interspecific competition does not limit the highly invasive thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis in Florida. Ecol. Entomol. 36: 181-187. Google Scholar

24.

D. M. Olson , R. F. Davis , S. L. Brown , P. Roberts , and S. C. Phatak . 2006. Cover crop, rye residue and in-furrow treatment effects on thrips. J. Appl. Entomol. 130: 302-308. Google Scholar

25.

D. R. Paini , J. E. Funderburk , C. T. Jackson , and S. R. Reitz . 2007. Reproduction of four thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on uncultivated hosts. J. Entomol. Sci. 42: 610–615. Google Scholar

26.

D. R. Paini , J. E. Funderburk , and S. R. Reitz . 2008. Competitive exclusion of a worldwide invasive pest by a native. Quantifying competition between two phytophagous insects on two host plant species. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 184–190. Google Scholar

27.

D. Peters , I. Wijkamp , F. van de Wetering , and R. Goldbach . 1996. Vector relations in the transmission of tospoviruses. Acta Horticulturae 431: 29–43. Google Scholar

28.

M. M. Prins , and R. Goldbach . 1998. The emerging problem of tospovirus infection and nonconventional methods of control. Trends Microbiol. 6: 31–35. Google Scholar

29.

S. R. Reitz 2002. Seasonal and within plant distribution of Frankliniella thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in north Florida tomatoes. Fla. Entomol. 85: 431–439. Google Scholar

30.

S. R. Reitz 2009. Biology and ecology of the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): the making of a pest. Fla. Entomol. 92: 7–13. Google Scholar

31.

S. R. Reitz , E. L. Year by , J. E. Funderburk , J. Stavisky , M. T. Momol , and S. M. Olson . 2003. Integrated management tactics for Frankliniella thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in field-grown pepper. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 1201–1214. Google Scholar

32.

D. G. Riley , and K. Batal . 1998. Management of thrips on onions, pp. 41–42. In B.W. Maw (ed.), 1996-1997 Georgia onion research-extension report. University of Georgia, Cooperative Research-Extension Publication No. 398, June 1998. University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA. Google Scholar

33.

D. G. Riley , G. M. Angelella , and R. M. McPherson . 2011. Pine pollen dehiscence relative to thrips population dynamics. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 138: 223–233. Google Scholar

34.

V. E. Salguero Navas , J. E. Funderburk , R. J. Beshear , S. M. Olson , and T. P. Mack . 1991a. Seasonal patterns of Frankliniella (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in tomato flowers. J. Econ. Entomol. 84: 1818–1822. Google Scholar

35.

V. E. Salguero Navas , J. E. Funderburk , S. M. Olson , and R. J. Beshear . 1991b. Damage to tomato fruit by the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 26: 436–442. Google Scholar

36.

SAS Institute. 2005. SAS/Stat users guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

37.

A. S. Scott Brown , S. J. M. Simmonds , and W. M. Blancy . 2002. Relationship between nutritional composition of plant species and infestation levels of tlrrips. J. Chem. Ecol. 28: 2399–2409. Google Scholar

38.

J. L. Sherwood , T. L. German , J. W. Moyer , and D. E. Ullman . 2000. Tospoviruses, pp. 1034–1040. In O. Maloy and T. Murray (eds.), Encyclopedia of plant pathology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. Google Scholar

39.

J. L. Shipp , K. Wang , and M. R. Binns . 2000. Economic injury levels of western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse cucumber. J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 1732–1740. Google Scholar

40.

C. M. Smith 1989. Plant resistance to insects: a fundamental approach, p. 220-286. Jone Wiley and Son, New York, NY. Google Scholar

41.

C. Soria , and C. Mollema . 1995. Life-history parameters of western flower thrips on susceptible and resistant cucumber genotypes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74: 177–184. Google Scholar

42.

T.R.E. South wood , and P. A. Henderson . 2000. Ecological methods, 3rd ed., p. 5–100. Blackwell Science, Oxford. Google Scholar

43.

J. W. Todd , A. K. Culbreath , J. R. Chamberlin , R. J. Beshear , and B. G. Mullinix . 1995. Colonization and population dynamics of thrips in peanuts in the southern United States, pp. 453–460. In B. L. Parker , M. Skinner , and T. Lewis (eds.), Thrips biology and management. Plenum, NY. Google Scholar

44.

J. C. van Lenteren , and L.P.J.J. Noldus . 1990. Whitefly-plant relationships: behavioural and ecological aspects, pp. 47–89. In D. Gerling (ed.), Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Intercept, Andover, UK. Google Scholar

45.

P.C. J. van Rijn , C. Mollenta , and G. M. Steenhuis-Broers . 1995. Comparative life history studies of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on cucumber. Bull. Entomol. Res. 85: 285–297. Google Scholar

46.

J. L. Wang , J. P. Wang , and C. Y. Zheng . 2011. The life tables of laboratory population of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci on purple cabbage. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 38: 390–394 (in Chinese). Google Scholar

47.

Z. J. Zhang , Q. J. Wu , X. F. Li , Y. J. Zhang , B. Y. Xu , and G. R. Zhu . 2007. Life history of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysan., Thripae), on five different vegetable leaves. J. Appl. Entomol. 131 : 347–354. Google Scholar

48.

J. R. Zhi , G. K. Fitch , D. C. Margolies , and J. R. Nechols . 2005. Apple pollen as a supplemental food for the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis: response of individuals and populations. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 117: 185–192. Google Scholar
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of America.
Wei-Di Li, Peng-Jun Zhang, Jing-Ming Zhang, Zhi-Jun Zhang, Fang Huang, Ya-Wei Bei, Wen-Cai Lin, and Yao-Bin Lu "An Evaluation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Performance on Different Plant Leaves Based on Life History Characteristics," Journal of Insect Science 15(1), 1-5, (1 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu167
Received: 16 February 2014; Accepted: 24 November 2014; Published: 1 January 2015
KEYWORDS
cucumber leaf
Frankliniella intonsa
Frankliniella occidentalis
life history
tomato leaf
Back to Top