Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2015 Comparative Feeding Performance and Digestive Physiology of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae-Fed 11 Corn Hybrids
A. S. Hosseininejad, B. Naseri, J. Razmjou
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the feeding responses and digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activity of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) on 11 corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids at 25±1°C, 65±5% relative humidity (RH), and a photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) h. The fourthand fifth-instar larvae fed on hybrid K47*K19 had the highest weight of food consumption and those reared on hybrid KSC705 had the lowest value of food consumption. The highest weight gain of the larvae was observed when H. armigera were fed hybrid KLM78*MO17 and lowest when they were fed hybrids K36 * MO17, KSC705, and K35 * K36. Pupal weight of H. armigera was heaviest when larvae were fed hybrid K47*K19 and lightest when they were fed hybrid KSC705. The highest proteolytic activity of the fourthinstar larvae was observed when they were fed hybrid KSC705, and the lowest activity was observed when they were fed hybrid K47*A67. Fifth-instar larvae that fed on hybrid K47*K19 showed the highest proteolytic activity. Fourth-instar larvae that fed on hybrid K36*MO17 showed the highest amylase activity. The fifth-instar larvae fed on hybrid K47*A67 showed the maximum amylase activity and those reared on the K48*K18 showed the minimum activity. Our results indicated that K36 * MO17, KSC705, and K48 * K18 were the most unsuitable hybrids for feeding H. armigera.

Corn grain (Zea mays L.) is not only important in terms of energy supply but also its green forage is high in quality and possible for silage making. Because of the importance of corn in humans and animals' nutrition as well as in industrial applications, identifying the barriers to its production seems to be necessary. One of the factors limiting corn production is the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), a common agricultural pest in Iran (Farid 1986; Naseri et al. 2011) and in many countries of the world (Liu et al. 2004; Harsulkar et al. 1999). Some important characteristics such as a broad host range (Zalucki et al. 1994), high mobility through flight (Drake 1991), high reproductive potential, and a facultative diapauses has allowed H. armigera to survive under unstable habitats (Fitt 1989). Application of chemical pesticides has led to a variety of environmental hazards and resistance in H. armigera to the pesticides, especially to synthetic pyrethroids (Gunning et al. 1984). Such hazards in the ecosystem and the increase of acute and chronic toxicity exposure in humans have led to notable changes in pest management guidelines (Naseri et al. 2009).

Host plant resistance serves an important tool, which is satisfactory in terms of economic and environmental health (Kennedy et al. 1987). Growth, development, and reproduction of insects strongly depend on the quality and quantity of the food eaten by them (Scriber and Slansky 1981). The primary and secondary metabolites of the host plants significantly affect the population parameters of herbivores (Bernays and Chapman 1994). The variation in growth is even more remarkable when different food constituents are involved (Ashfaq et al. 2003). Nutritional regulation by an insect represents the integrated outcome of a highly complex set of interacting processes. Acquisition and allocation of different nutrient molecules required for survival and reproduction of the insects is central to these processes (Simpson and Raubenheimer 1999). For availability of the major nutrients, regulation of digestive enzymes gains priority. Activities of the insects' digestive enzymes are affected by various factors, such as the stage of individuals (larval or adult stage), the midgut pH, and secondary metabolites in the ingested tissues of the plants (Amorim et al. 2008).

Digestion of dietary protein is an essential process for herbivorous insects. During their development, insect larvae liberate free amino acids and nitrogen by the action of endopeptidases and exopeptidases. In response to insect feeding, plants produce inhibitory proteins to interfere with the insects' digestive system (Green and Ryan 1972). The proteolysis in the lepidopteran larvae gastrointestinal tract is inhibited by these inhibitors. Proteolysis inhibition which interfere with amino acid metabolism is a key target to control insect pests (Hilder et al. 1992), leading to decreased utilization of food resources, growth delay, reduction in insect survival, size or weight, and reproduction of the new generation adults (Gatehouse et al. 1999). Amylases (α-1, 4 glucan 4 glucanohydrolases; EC 3.2.1.1) are of the most important enzymes in insects' digestion biochemistry including the lepidopteran larvae. These enzymes catalyze hydrolysis of a-D-(1, 4)-glucan linkage in starch components, glycogen, and other related carbohydrates to serve as an energy source (Franco et al. 2000).

Previously, Cohen and Patana (1984) evaluated the efficiency of food utilization by Heliothis zea (Boddie) -fed artificial diets or green beans. Food consumption and digestive enzymatic activity of H. armigera on different host plants have recently been studied by several authors (Kotkar et al. 2009; Naseri et al. 2010; Fathipour and Naseri 2011; Hemati et al. 2012a,b; Rahimi Namin et al. 2014). However, little information is available about nutritional responses and digestive physiology of H. armigera on seeds of various corn hybrids when incorporated into artificial diets (Arghand et al. 2011, Naseri and Razmjou 2013). Therefore, we studied feeding performance, digestive proteolytic, and amylolytic activities of H. armigera fourth and fifth instar on 11 corn hybrids to better understand the digestion physiology of the pest. Such information will be important for identifying efficient proteinase inhibitors (PIs) from different corn hybrids and their subsequent use for transgenic expression in host plants to supply stable resistance against H. armigera.

Materials and Methods

Plant Sources. In this study, 11 hybrids of corn including K47/2-2-1- 22-1-1-1*K19, K3547/3*K3615/2, K3653/2*MO17, K3615/2*K19/1, KSC705, KLM77002/10-1-1-1-1-6-1*K19/1, K47/22-1-22-1-1- 1*A679, K48/3-1-1-3-2-1-1-1*K18, KLM78018/6-1-1-1-3-2 * MO17, KSC720, and KSC704 were obtained from Gorgan Center of Agricultural Researches and Natural Resources in the suburbs of Gorgan, Iran, in summer 2012. Hybrid corn is a strain produced by fertilizing one variety of corn plant with the pollen from another. The source of our plant was a national project started 5 years ago in Iran which consisted of two steps. The first step was to inbreed a desirable strain of corn for five generations. Inbreeding was done by pollinating the young ear with pollen from its own plant. To prevent pollen from other plants from contacting the silk, the tassels and young ears were enclosed in bags. The next step was to select two strains of inbred plants, each with certain desirable qualities, and to crossbreed them. This was done by placing pollen from one strain on the silk of a plant of the other strain. The tassels were removed from the plants that were to bear the hybrid ears, so that the female-parent plants did not receive their own pollen but got pollen only from the male-parent plants in the adjoining rows. This crossbreeding produced hybrid ears.

Insect Collection and Rearing. Fifth-instar larvae of H. armigera were collected from cotton fields in Gorgan (North of Iran) in July and August 2012. For this study, the grains of different corn hybrids were detached from different hybrids and transferred to a controlled growth chamber (25±1°C, 65±5% relative humidity [RH], and a photoperiod of 16:8 [L:D] h). The corn tassel was used for feeding of first and second larval instars, and the immature corn kernels were used for feeding of the third to fifth larval instars. Fresh food material was provided every 12 h. The insects tested on different hybrids of corn had already been reared for two generations on the same hybrids they were fed during experiments.

Neonate larvae were gathered from the stock culture and separated into five replicates (10 larvae in each) and transferred into plastic containers (diameter: 19.5 cm, depth: 7.5 cm) with a hole covered by a mesh net for aeration, containing the fresh corn tassel of each examined hybrid. The end of detached tassel was inserted in water-soaked cotton to maintain freshness. A fine camel's hair brush was used to transfer the younger larvae. The first- and second-instar larvae were reared in groups until the third instar, after which they were divided onto individual plastic plates (diameter: 8 cm, depth: 1 cm) to prevent cannibalism (Twine 1971). Head capsules or exuviae from molting larvae were used to distinguish the larval instars. For prepupation and pupation, fifthinstar larvae were kept in small plastic tubes (diameter: 2 cm, depth: 5 cm).

Feeding Responses of H. armigera. For this examination, a gravimetric method described by Waldbauer (1968) was used to evaluate feeding responses of H. armigera on different corn hybrids. Larval weight, food consumed, and feces produced by fourth- and fifth-instar larvae fed on different corn hybrids were measured. The prepupa and pupa from the larvae reared on each hybrid were weighed as well. To obtain the percentage of dry weights of the foods, feces, larvae, prepupa, and pupa, 20 extra specimens for each were weighed, oven-dried (48 h at 60°C), and subsequently reweighed.

Chemicals. The general proteolytic substrate azocasein, Bradford reagent, the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), and the amylolytic substrate starch were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

Preparation of Larval Midgut Homogenates. Fourth- and fifthinstar larvae reared on different corn hybrids (for 24 h) were cold incapable and quickly dissected under a stereomicroscope in cold distilled water. The midguts of the larvae were homogenized on ice by a handheld glass homogenizer. The homogenates were then centrifuged at 16,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was gathered, frozen in aliquots, and stored at -20°C until needed for protease and amylase assays.

Protein Quantification of Larvae. General protein concentrations in the midgut of fourth- and fifth-instar larvae of H. armigera were determined using bovine serum albumin as a standard according to the method of Bradford (1976).

Proteolytic Activity. General proteolytic activity present in the midgut of H. armigera larvae fed on different corn hybrids was assayed using azocasein as a substrate at the optimal pH=12. To evaluate the azocaseinolytic activity, the reaction mixture containing 80 μl of 1.5% azocasein solution in 50mM universal buffer system (50mM sodium phosphate-borate) (pH 12) and 50 μl of crude enzyme was incubated at 37°C for 50 min. Proteolysis was finished by the addition of 100 μl of 30% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), continued with cooling at 4°C for 30 min and centrifugation at 16,000×g for 10 min. An equal quantity of 2M NaOH was added to the supernatant, and the absorbance was read at 440 nm. Appropriate blanks that TCA had been added before the substrate were prepared for each examination. Unit activity was represented as an increase in optical density per milligram protein of the tissue per minute due to azocasein proteolysis (Elpidina et al. 2001). All experiments were carried out in three replicates.

Amylolytic Activity. Digestive amylolytic activity of H. armigera larvae fed on different corn hybrids was determined using the DNS method, with 1% soluble starch as substrate at the optimal pH=9 (Bernfeld 1955). A quantity of 50 μl of the enzyme was incubated with 250 μl of universal buffer system (10mMsuccinate-glycine-2, morpholinoethan sulfonic acid) (pH 9) and 20 μl of soluble starch for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μl DNS and heating in boiling water for 10 min. The absorbance was determined at 540 nm after cooling on ice. One unit of amylase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1mg of maltose in 30 min at 37°C under the given assay conditions. All experiments were carried out in three replicates.

Statistical Analysis. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance followed by comparison of the means with Tukey HSD test at α=0.05 using statistical software Minitab 16.0 (Minitab Inc. 2000). All data were tested for normality before analysis.

Results

Feeding Responses of H. armigera. The highest larval weight of the fourth instar (F=19.16; df=319, 329; P <0.05) was on hybrids K47 * K19 (67.35±2.95 mg per larva) and KLM78 * MO17 (66.69±0.70 mg per larva) and the lowest was on hybrids K35 * K36 (49.57±1.41 mg per larva) and KSC704 (49.19±0.84 mg per larva). In the fifth-instar larvae, the highest larval weight (F=8.80; df=319, 329; P<0.05) was observed when H. armigera were fed hybrid KLM78 * MO17 (109.66±0.64 mg per larva), and the lowest was observed when they were fed hybrids K48 * K18 (92.85±0.34 mg per larva), and KSC705 (91.63±2.56 mg per larva). The weight of whole fourth and fifth instars (F=12.89; df=318, 328; P<0.05) was heaviest when larvae were fed hybrids KLM78 * MO17 (88.17±0.48 mg per larva) and K47 * K19 (86.47±2.43 mg per larva) and lightest when they were fed hybrids K35 * K36 (76.50±1.18 mg per larva), KSC704 (75.52±0.73 mg per larva), K36 * MO17 (75.48±1.32 mg per larva), and KSC705 (74.39±1.40 mg per larva) (Fig. 1).

Figure 2 shows feeding responses of H. armigera whole fourth- and fifth-instar larvae-fed 11 corn hybrids. The fourth- and fifth-instar larvae consumed more food (F=56.85; df=318, 328; P<0.05) when they were fed hybrid K47 * K19 (1,170.90±31.90 mg per larva). The feces produced (F=85.51; df=319, 329; P<0.05) was the highest when larvae fed hybrid K36 * MO17 (193.75±4.79 mg per larva) and lowest when they were reared hybrids KSC720 (91.02±3.92 mg per larva) and KSC705 (87.70±2.79 mg per larva). The highest weight gain of the larvae (F=67.39; df=317, 327; P<0.05) was on hybrid KLM78 * MO17 (37.69±0.50 mg per larva) and the lowest was on hybrids K36 * MO17 (16.22±0.81 mg per larva), KSC705 (17.51±0.63 mg per larva), and K35 * K36 (18.01±0.74 mg per larva) (Fig. 2).

Figure 3 shows prepupal and pupal weight of H. armigera fed different corn hybrids. Our results indicated that the prepupa (F=7.55; df=319, 329; P<0.05) and pupa were heaviest (F=28.69; df=319, 329; P<0.05) when larvae were fed hybrid K47 * K19 (360.30±9.39 and 305.10±8.11 mg, respectively). However, the lowest prepupal weight was observed when larvae fed hybrid KLM77 * K19 (302.10±2.87 mg), and the lowest pupal weight was observed when they were fed hybrid KSC705 (220.73±5.19 mg).

Fig. 1.

Mean larval weight of fourth (A), fifth (B), and whole fourth- and fifth- (C) instar larvae of H. armigera-fed different corn hybrids. Bars represent standard error of the means. The means followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey HSD, P<0.05).

f01_01.jpg

General Proteolytic Activity. The general proteolytic activity data from midgut extracts of H. armigera larvae-fed 11 corn hybrids are indicated in Fig. 4. The highest proteolytic activity of H. armigera fourth-instar larvae (F=33.60; df=11, 21; P<0.05) was observed when H. armigera were fed hybrid KSC705 (4.85±0.24Umg-1), and the lowest activity was observed when they were fed hybrid K47 * A67 (1.34±0.19Umg-1). Fifth instars that fed on hybrid K47 * K19 (8.38±0.06Umg-1) showed the highest general proteolytic activity (F=76.07; df=11, 21; P<0.05), and those reared on hybrid K48 * K18 (0.24±0.03 (Umg-1) showed the lowest activity.

Amylolitic Activity. Figure 5 shows mean amylolytic activity of midgut extracts from H. armigera larvae-fed different corn hybrids.The highest amylase activity in H. armigera fourth instar (F=40.70; df=11, 21; P<0.05) was detected when larvae were fed hybrid K36 * MO17 (1.17±0.04Umg-1), and the lowest activity was observed when they were fed hybrids K48 * K18 (0.45±0.006Umg-1) and KLM78 * MO17 (0.42±0.03 Umg-1). Fifth-instar larvae fed on hybrid K47 * A67 (F=26.95; df=11, 21; P<0.05) (4.49±0.47Umg-1) showed the maximum amylase activity and those reared on K48 * K18 (0.54±0.003 Umg-1) showed the minimum activity of the enzyme.

Discussion

Larvae of H. armigera are voracious feeders and are highly adaptive to the kind of food ingested or available. Digestive gut proteinases of H. armigera revealed their complex diverse and flexible nature for protein digestion during larval development and upon feeding on various host plants (Patankar et al. 2001, Chougule et al. 2005). Efforts are being made to use PIs, as a class of plant defense proteins against herbivores, to develop insect resistance in susceptible crop plants. However, understanding of insect digestive enzymes is a prerequisite to plan strategies for successful and sustainable application of PIs (Franco et al. 2000).

The amount of ingested food gradually increases during growth of insects from earlier to last instars. Because of a high nutritional value of hybrids KLM78 * MO17 and K47 * K19, heaviest larvae were found on these hybrids. Also, the lowest weight of the larvae fed on hybrid KSC705 could be due to its low nutritional value. The weight of fifth instar H. armigera-fed KSC705 is 2-fold higher than that reported by Naseri and Razmjou (2013) for the larval weight of H. armigera fifth instar on artificial diet prepared by corn hybrid SC704 (45.77±6.16 mg) as a suitable hybrid. Also, the food consumption by fifth instar H. armigera-fed KSC705 is approximately 3-fold higher than that reported for the food consumption by H. armigera fifth instar on artificial diet prepared by the seed of SC500 (219.56±11.40 mg) as a suitable corn hybrid (Naseri and Razmjou 2013). It could be suggested that the corn hybrids used, in our research, for feeding of the larvae are more nutritive than those tested by aforementioned researchers. According to Kotkar et al. (2009), artificial diets are complete foods for high insect performance and usually considered to be healthier than natural diets. However, our findings about larval weight and food consumption by H. armigera rearing on natural corn hybrids are not in agreement with the results of Kotkar et al. (2009), indicating that natural corn diet for H. armigera larvae is more nutritive than artificial diet prepared by corn seeds. Differences in the tested corn hybrids, variation in the type of the diet used for larval feeding (natural or artificial diets), and the genetic diversity of the examined H. armigera populations are probable explanations for such discrepancy.

Fig. 2.

Mean food consumed (A), feces produced (B), and larval weight gain (C) of whole fourth and fifth instars H. armigera-fed different corn hybrids. Bars represent standard error of the means. The means followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey HSD, P<0.05).

f02_01.jpg

Fig. 3.

Mean prepupal (A) and pupal (B) weight of H. armigera-fed different corn hybrids. Bars represent standard error of the means. The means followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey HSD, P<0.05).

f03_01.jpg

Fig. 4.

Mean proteolytic activity (Umg-1) of midgut extracts from H. armigera fourth and fifth instars fed different corn hybrids. Bars represent standard error of the means. The means followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey HSD, P<0.05).

f04_01.jpg

It is reported that the body weight is one of the main biological indices of insect population dynamics (Liu et al. 2004). The value for the pupal weight of H. armigera on hybrid K47 * K19 was heavier than that reported for H. armigera reared on corn (285.2 mg) (Liu et al. 2004) and on artificial diet prepared by seeds of different corn hybrids (260.75 mg) (Arghand et al. 2011). This finding emphasizes that the corn hybrids evaluated in our study are more nutritious for pupal stage than those used in the previous studies.

The amount of food, temperature, and acidity are important factors directly affecting the activity of digestive enzymes and the energy production needed for growth and development (Sivakumar et al. 2006). The larval stage of H. armigera is actively feeding stage responsible for accumulation of nutrients to complete its life cycle. Previous studies showed that disturbance in protein metabolism due to the presence of PIs in H. armigera larval diet results in reduced growth and fecundity (Telang et al. 2003). Insects can quickly alter their midgut composition in response to the protease inhibitors through regulating the proteases secretion (Jongsma and Bolter 1997, Harsulkar et al. 1999). The highest proteolytic activity of H. armigera fourth-instar larvae on hybrid KSC705 could be due to the presence of some PIs in this hybrid, which inhibit certain proteinases and make the insects to produce more digestive enzymes by the midgut cells. Furthermore, the food consumption, feces produced, and weight gain of the fourth-instar larvae were the lowest on KSC705 as compared to any other hybrid. Hyperproduction of proteinases in response to the PIs can cause more energy demand and essential amino acid production and finally results in developmental delay and decrease in the insect feeding (Broadway and Duffy 1986). The fifth-instar larvae H. armigera reared on hybrid K47 * K19 had the highest proteolytic activity, which might be due to the higher food consumed by the larvae (Fig. 4). Variations in digestive enzymatic activities of H. armigera on different corn hybrids could be because of the presence of isoenzymes. The insects gut and complexity of different protease specificities has a set of diverse protease isoforms. For example, the gut of H. armigera approximately includes 20 different types of active serine protease isoforms (Purcell et al. 1992). Proteolytic activity of H. armigera fifth-instar larvae fed on hybrid K47 * K19 shows approximately 2-fold higher activity than those fed on cowpea-based artificial diet (Naseri et al. 2010) and is nearly similar to those larvae reared on artificial diet prepared by corn hybrids SC500 and DC370 (Naseri and Razmjou 2013).

Fig. 5.

Mean amylolytic activity (Umg-1) of midgut extracts from H. armigera fourth and fifth instars fed different corn hybrids. Bars represent standard error of the means. The means followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey HSD, P<0.05).

f05_01.jpg

In this study, we measured α-amylase of H. armigera larvae in midgut, and our results showed that this enzyme exists in high levels. Amylolytic activity of the fifth-instar larvae fed on hybrid K47 * A67 is lower than that reported by Naseri and Razmjou (2013) for amylolytic activity of H. armigera on corn-based artificial diet.

In polyphagous insects, different diet items can lead to various negative effects including reduced food consumption, decreased weight gain, lighter larva, or pupa, which we found the majority of these effects in larvae fed on hybrids K36 * MO17, KSC705, and K48 * K18, suggesting unsuitability of these hybrids for H. armigera growth and development. For a better understanding of the H. armigera-corn interaction to its control, more attention should be allocated to investigate life table parameters of this pest on various corn hybrids under laboratory and field conditions. Results obtained from such experiments regarding choosing and developing resistant corn hybrids could be helpful to comprehensively manage H. armigera population under field conditions. Using resistant varieties means reducing pesticide use, reducing producer, and consumers costs as well as reducing environmental risks posed by using these chemicals (Da Silva et al. 2004). However, the cost of developing resistant varieties should also be considered. In the future studies, H. armigera response to the PIs should be necessarily considered for selection of proper PIs that could be used in transgenic expression for the insect resistance.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (Ardabil, Iran) and Gorgan Center of Agricultural Researches and Natural Resources (Golestan, Iran) for financial support and accompanying during the course of the project. We are also grateful to Seyyed-Mohsen Hosseininejad for his assistance in editing this manuscript.

References Cited

1.

T.M.L. Amorim , L.L.P. Macedo , A. F. Uchoa , A. S. Oliveira , J.C.M. Pitanga , F. P. Macedo , E. A. Santos , and M. P. De Sales . 2008. Proteolytic digestive enzymes and peritrophic membranes during the development of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Piralidae): targets for the action of soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI) and chitin-binding vicilin (EvV). J. Agric. Food Chem. 56: 7738–7745. Google Scholar

2.

A. Arghand , B. Naseri , J. Razmjou , and M. Hassanpour . 2011. Feeding indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on seed of five different maize hybrids, p. 41. In Proceedings of Global Conference on Entomology, 5–9 March, 2011, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Google Scholar

3.

M. Ashfaq , K. J. Ahmad , and A. Ali . 2003. Morphophysical factors affecting consumption and coefficient of utilization of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Pak. J. Appl. Sci. 3: 225–230. Google Scholar

4.

E. A. Bernays , and R. F. Chapman . 1994. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY. Google Scholar

5.

P. Bernfeld 1955. Amylase, a and b. Methods Enzymol. 1: 149–158. Google Scholar

6.

M. A. Bradford 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254. Google Scholar

7.

R. M. Broadway , and S. S. Duffy . 1986. Plant proteinase inhibitors: mechanism of action and effect on the growth and digestive physiology of larval Heliothis zea and Spodoptera exigua. J. Insect Physiol. 32: 827–833. Google Scholar

8.

N. P. Chougule , A. P. Giri , M. N. Sainani , and V. S. Gupta . 2005. Gene expression patterns of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteases. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35: 355–367. Google Scholar

9.

A. C. Cohen , and R. Patana . 1984. Efficiency of food utilization by Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed artificial diets or green beans. Can. Entomol. 116: 139–146. Google Scholar

10.

M.C.M. Da Silva , L. V. Mello , M. V. Coutinho , D. J. Rigden , G. Neshich , M. J. Chrispeels , and M. F. Grossi-de-sa . 2004. Mutants of common been alpha-amylase. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 39: 201–208. Google Scholar

11.

V.A. Drake 1991. Methods for studying adult movement in Heliothis, pp. 109–121. In M. P. Zalucki (ed.), Heliothis: research methods and prospects. Springer, New York, NY. Google Scholar

12.

E. N. Elpidina , K. S. Vinokurov , V. A. Gromenko , Y. A. Rudenshaya , Y. E. Dunaevsky , and D. P. Zhuzhikov . 2001. Compartmentalization of proteinases and amylases in Nauphoeta cinerea midgut. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 48: 206–216. Google Scholar

13.

A. Farid 1986. Study of bollworm Heliothis armigera (Hübner) on tomato in Jyroft and Kahnuj. Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol. 54: 15–24 (in Persian with English summary). Google Scholar

14.

Y. Fathipour , and B. Naseri . 2011. Soybean cultivars affecting performance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), pp. 599–630. In T. B. Ng (ed.), Soybean-biochemistry, chemistry and physiology, vol. 642. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. Google Scholar

15.

G.P. Fitt 1989. The ecology of Heliothis in relation to agroecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 17–52. Google Scholar

16.

O. L. Franco , D. J. Rigden , F. R. Melo , C. Bloch Jr. , C. P. Silva and M. F. Grossi-de-Sa . 2000. Activity of wheat a-amylase inhibitors towards bruchid a-amylases and structural explanation of observed specificities. Eur. J. Biochem. 267: 2166–2173. Google Scholar

17.

A.M.R. Gatehouse , E. Norton , G. M. Davidson , S. M. Babbe , C. A. Newell , and J. A. Gatehouse . 1999. Digestive proteolytic activity in larvae of tomato moth, Lacenobia oleracea; effects of plant protease inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. J. Insect Physiol. 45: 545–558. Google Scholar

18.

T. R. Green , and C. A. Ryan . 1972. Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense against insect. Science 175: 776–777. Google Scholar

19.

R. V. Gunning , C. S. Easton , L. R. Greenup , and V. E. Edge . 1984. Pyrethroid resistance in Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 1283–1287. Google Scholar

20.

A. M. Harsulkar , A. P. Giri , A. G. Patankar , V. S. Gupta , M. N. Sainani , P. K. Ranjekar , and V. V. Deshpande . 1999. Successive use of non-host plant proteinase inhibitors required for effective inhibition of gut proteinases and larval growth of Helicoverpa armigera. Plant Physiol. 121: 497–506. Google Scholar

21.

S. A. Hemati , B. Naseri , G. Nouri-Ghanbalani , H. Rafiee-Dastjerdi , and A. Golizadeh . 2012a. Digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activities and feeding responses of Helicoverpa armigera on different host plants. J. Econ. Entomol. 105: 1439–1446. Google Scholar

22.

S. A. Hemati , B. Naseri , G. Nouri-Ghanbalani , H. Rafiee-Dastjerdi , and A. Golizadeh . 2012b. Effect of different host plants on nutritional indices of the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. J. Insect Sci. 12: 55. Google Scholar

23.

V. A. Hilder , A.M.R. Gatehouse , and D. Boulter . 1992. Transgenic plants conferring insect tolerance: protease inhibitor approach, pp. 310–338. In S. Kung and R. Wu (eds.), Transgenic plants, vol. 33. Academic Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

24.

M. A. Jongsma , and C. Bolter . 1997. The adaptation of insects to plant protease inhibitors. J. Insect Physiol. 43: 885–895. Google Scholar

25.

G. G. Kennedy , F. Gould , O. M. B. Deponti , and R. E. Stinner . 1987. Ecological, agricultural, genetic, and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm. Environ. Entomol. 16: 327–338. Google Scholar

26.

H. M. Kotkar , P. J. Sarate , V. A. Tamhane , V. S. Gupta , and A. P. Giri . 2009. Responses of midgut amylases of Helicoverpa armigera to feeding on various host plants. J. Insect Physiol. 55: 663–670. Google Scholar

27.

Z. Liu , D. Li , P. Y. Gong , and K. J. Wu . 2004. Life table studies of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on different host plants. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1570–1576. Google Scholar

28.

Minitab Inc. 2000. Minitab user's guide 1 and 2. Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA. Google Scholar

29.

B. Naseri , Y. Fathipour , S. Moharramipour , and V. Hosseininaveh . 2009. Comparative life history and fecundity of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different soybean varieties. Entomol. Sci. 12: 147–154. Google Scholar

30.

B. Naseri , Y. Fathipour , S. Moharramipour , V. Hosseininaveh , and A.M.R. Gatehouse . 2010. Digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activities of Helicoverpa armigera in response to feeding on different soybean cultivars. Pest Manage. Sci. 66: 1316–1323. Google Scholar

31.

B. Naseri , Y. Fathipour , S. Moharramipour , and V. Hosseininaveh . 2011. Comparative reproductive performance of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared on thirteen soybean cultivars. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 13: 17–26. Google Scholar

32.

B. Naseri , and J. Razmjou . 2013. Effect of artificial diets containing different maize hybrids powdered seeds on digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activities and nutritional responses of Helicoverpa armigera (Lep.: Noctuidae). Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol. 80: 9–18. Google Scholar

33.

A. G. Patankar , A. P. Giri , A. M. Harsulkar , M. N. Sainani , V. V. Deshpande , P. K. Ranjekar , and V. S. Gupta . 2001. Complexity in specificities and expression of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteases explains polyphagous nature of the insect pest. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31: 453–464. Google Scholar

34.

J. P. Purcell , J. T. Greenplate , and R. D. Sammons . 1992. Examination of midgut luminal proteinase activities in six economically important insects. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 22: 41–47. Google Scholar

35.

F. Rahimi Namin , B. Naseri , and J. Razmjou . 2014. Nutritional performance and activity of some digestive enzymes of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera: response to bean cultivars. J. Insect Sci. 14: 93. Google Scholar

36.

J. M. Scriber , and F. Slansky . 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26: 183–211. Google Scholar

37.

S. J. Simpson , and D. Raubenheimer . 1999. Assuaging nutritional complexity: a geometrical approach. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 58: 779–789. Google Scholar

38.

S. Sivakumar , M. Mohan , O. L. Franco , and B. Thayumanavan . 2006. Inhibition of insect pest a-amylases by little and finger millet inhibitors. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 85: 155–160. Google Scholar

39.

M. Telang , A. Srinivasan , A. Patankar , A. Harsulkar , V. Joshi , A. Damle , V. Deshpande , M. Sainani , P. K. Ranjekar , G. Gupta , et al. 2003. Bitter gourd proteinase inhibitors: potential growth inhibitors of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura. Phytochemistry 63: 643–652. Google Scholar

40.

B. H. Twine 1971. Cannibalistic behaviour of Heliothis armigera (Hübner). Qld. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 28: 153–157. Google Scholar

41.

G. P. Waldbauer 1968. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 5: 229–288. Google Scholar

42.

M. P. Zalucki , A. H. Murray , P. C. Gregg , G. P. Fitt , P. H. Twine , and C. Jones . 1994. Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and H. Punctigera (Wallengren) in the Inland of Australia: larval sampling and host plant relationships during winter and spring. Aust. J. Zool. 42: 329–346. Google Scholar
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of America.
A. S. Hosseininejad, B. Naseri, and J. Razmjou "Comparative Feeding Performance and Digestive Physiology of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae-Fed 11 Corn Hybrids," Journal of Insect Science 15(1), 1-6, (1 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu179
Received: 15 August 2014; Accepted: 10 December 2014; Published: 1 January 2015
KEYWORDS
corn
cotton bollworm
digestive enzyme
feeding response
Back to Top