Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2002 Karyotype, C- and G-band Patterns and DNA content of Callimenus (=Bradyporus) macrogaster macrogaster
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Chromosomes and detailed karyotype information (the number, shape, relative length, arm ratio, centromeric index) of Callimenus (=Bradyporus) macrogaster macrogaster Lef. (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea, Bradyporini) of Turkey belonging to the subfamily Bradyporinae are described. The diploid number of chromosomes was found to be 2n ♂= 23, with 2 metacentric pairs, 2 submetacentric pairs, 6 acrocentric pairs. The X chromosome is metacentric. This species has a XX ♀/ X0 ♂ sex determining mechanism. The basic karyotype is complemented by a description of C- and G-banding patterns. The C-banding pattern in spermatogonial metaphase was characterized by the presence of paracentromeric C-bands in all chromosomes, and a distal C-band in chromosome 5. The G-banding pattern was complex. The 2C nuclear DNA content was found to be 10.26 ± 0.16 picograms by microspectrophotometry.

Introduction

The genus Bradyporini belongs to the subfamily Bradyporinae. The karyotypes ( only the chromosome number and sex determination) of eight species of Bradyporini have been studied (Georgevitch, 1933; Fernandez-Piqueras et al., 1982, 1983; Sentis et al., 1988; Warchalowska-Sliwa, 1998). The chromosome number in the species of this genus ranges from 2n♂ = 25 (Georgevitch, 1933) to 29 (Fernandez-Piqueras et al., 1982; Sentis et al., 1988).

Callimenus macrogaster macrogaster belongs to the genus Bradyporini having a wide geographical range in Balkan area and Turkey (Lodos, 1991). In Turkey, it is found at a considerable range of altitudes above 2200m. Hitherto, no karyological studies in this species have been done.

In the present work the karyotype of C. macrogaster was characterized by cytotaxonomical methods, including chromosome number, morphology, and C- and G-banding patterns and their relation to the other known karyotypes of Bradyporini is discussed. Additionally, the DNA content of C. macrogaster was calculated. The present results form the first part of a cytological survey of the Bradyporini and provide a basis for further population investigations and comparetive studies of interspecies or intraspecies of the Bradyporini.

Materials and Methods

Five adult males and six females of Callimenus (=Bradyporus) macrogaster macrogaster Lef. were collected from Manisa (The Spil Mountain) on Turkey in June 1999.

The males were injected with 0.1–0.2 ml of 0.1 % colchicine. After 1.5–3 hrs the testes were fixed in ethanol-acetic acid mixture (3:1). Tissues were then minced gently in 50 % acetic acid to prepare a cell suspension. A drop of the cell suspension was placed on heated clean glass slides. The cell left on the slide were dried and then stained for 20 min in 2 % Giemsa solution.

C-banding was performed using the method described by Sumner (1972). G-banding was induced appliying technique of Hillis et al.(1996) with minor modifications. Air-dried, preparations were digested for 25–30 seconds in a 0.02 trypsin solution, rinsed in cold PBS (0.15 M NaCl–0.05 M NaHPO4, pH 7.4) for 10 minutes, stained with 5 % Giemsa (pH 6.8), washed twice in distilled water, dried and then embedded in Enthellan (Merck,  www.merck.com).

The preparations were examined under a light microscope with 100X magnification and the metaphasic mitotic plates (10 plates for each male individual) with clear and well-distributed chromosomes were photographed. Chromosomes were classified according to Levan et al. (1964).

For Feulgen cytophotometric estimation of 2C nuclear DNA content the fixed testes were hydrolysed in 5 N HCl for 30 minutes at room temperature and stained in Feulgen solution for one hour. The stained testes were washed in three changes of SO2 water (5 gm SO2, 5 ml HCl in 100 ml distilled water) for 10 minutes each. Darkly stained testes were squashed in a drop of 45 % glaciel acetic acid. Cytophotometric measurement of 2C spermatid DNA was made using a Reichert-Zetopan microspectrophometer, at a wavelength of 550 nm. On average, 35, 2C spermatid nuclei were measured in each of three replicates in this species. Chick erythrocyte nuclei were used as a control. Each 2C chick erythrocyte nucleus contains 2.88 pg of DNA (Mirsky and Ris, 1951).

Results

The analysed individuals of the species C. macrogaster were found to have a chromosome number of 2n ♂= 23 (22 A+ X) (FN= 32), and the basic Orthopteran sex determining mechanism, XX ♀/ X0 ♂. At the spermatogonial metaphase of this species two pairs (1, 2) of metacentric, two pairs (3, 4) of submetacentric, and six pairs (5–11) of acrocentric autosomes were visible. The metacentric X chromosome is the second largest chromosome (Figs. 1 & 2). The chromosome length, relative length, centromeric index, arm ratio and chromosome morphology were measured from 10 metaphasal plates and are presented in Table 1.

The C-banding pattern in the spermatogonial metaphase was characterized by the presence of paracentromeric C-bands in all chromosomes. Additionally, a distal C-band is present in chromosome 5 (Fig. 3).

The karyotype obtained after staining the chromosomes for G-bands is shown on Figure 4. The centromeric areas of all chromosomes were G-band positive. In chromosome 1 and X, there were dark bands and light interbands in the short and long arms. Other chromosomes had bands in the their long arms. Additionally, a wide G-band was present in chromosome 6.

The 2C nuclear DNA content of C. macrogaster was found to be 10.26 ± 0.16 picograms.

Discussion

Few chromosomal studies on the longhorned grasshoppers have been done in general and of species from Turkey in particular. In the Tettigoniidae, the 2n ♂ chromosome number ranges from 20 to 35 (Warchalowska-Sliwa, 1998) and they exhibit a certain degree of conservatism of karyotypes.

In the subfamily Bradyporinae, 29 karyotypes (including chromosomal races) of 25 species (out of 12 genera), distributed in the South Palearctic area, have been so far described (Warchalowska-Sliwa, 1998). Three species of Zichyini are characterized by 2n ♂= 31, which is considered as the basic karyotype (Warchalowska-Sliwa and Bugrov, 1996). Bradyporinae show karyotypes ranging from 31 to 22 with an X0 or neo-XY sex determination mechanism, the latter occuring only in two species, Callicrania seoanei and Pycnogaster cucullata.

The chromosome numbers of species of Bradyporini range from 25 to 29 (Warchalowska-Sliwa, 1998). Pycnogaster finotii, P. graellsii, P. inermis, P. sanchezgamezi and P. cucullata have 29 chromosomes (♂) (L1 metacentric; M2-S14, X acrocentric) (Fernandez-Piqueras etal., 1982; Sentis et al., 1988). Bradyporus dasypus and Callimenus oniscus have 27 chromosomes (♂) (L1-L2, X metacentric; M3-S13 acrocentric and L1, X metacentric; L2 submetacentric; M3-S13 acrocentric, respectively) (Warchalowska-Sliwa, 1998). Bradyporus macrogaster pancici has 25 or 29 chromosomes (♂) (Georgevitch, 1933), but the chromosome morphology of this species is not known.

As shown here, the chromosome complement of C. macrogaster consists of the standard karyotype with 2n = 23 chromosomes (two pairs and X chromosome metacentric; two pairs submetacentric; six pairs acrocentric) chromosomes in the male. The lower chromosome numbers 2n ♂= 27, 25, and 23 in this genus were formed owing to complex translocations (Fernandez-Piqueras et al., 1983; Warchalowska-Sliwa and Bugrov, 1996).

The sex determination XX ♀ and X0 ♂ in C. macrogaster was observed. However, Fernandez-Piqueras et al. (1982, 1983) recorded a neo-XY sex chromosome mechanism in P. cucullata (2n=26+XY).

The application of banding procedures in cytogenetic studies facilitates the understanding of various problems. In Orthoptera, the C-banding technique and Ag-staining of the nucleolus organizer region (NOR) is normally used in comparative studies of populations, races and species. As described here, paracentromeric C-bands are uniformly present in the long and medium sized chromosomes of C. macrogaster. Additionally, in this species pair 5 has a distal C-band. However, paracentromeric, distal and interstitial C-positive bands were demostrated in a few species of Tettigonioidea (Fernandez-Piqueras et al. 1984; Navas-Castillo et al. 1986; Warchalowska-Sliwa and Maryanska-Nadachowska, 1992).

Although the G-band technique does not yield G-bands like those in mammalian chromosomes, it provides considerable information about the nature of many chromosomal regions in C. macrogaster. As can be seen, the intensity of staining of the G-bands were different and their localization very diversified (Fig. 4). The identification of the particular pairs of chromosomes after G-banding was therefore difficult. In pairs 5, 7, 9, 10 were weakly staining bands in some other pairs they were easily stained (pairs 2, 3, 6, 8, 11), while in still other pairs mixed bands were visible. Dark G bands correspond to chromatin containing AT-rich DNA sequences, while light interbands reflect GC-rich DNA sequences. Moreover, it seems clear that nonhistone proteins and their interactions with DNA are involved in the production of G-bands (Camacho et al. 1991).

DNA content is now known from direct measurements for close to a thousand species of animals and plants and from indirect measurements, such as calculations from chromosome or nuclear size, for many additional species. These amounts in free-living organisms range from 0.007 pg. for an average bacterium to 100 pg. or more for the haploid amount of DNA in some plants and salamaders (Gosalvez et al. 1980).

The first relationship between DNA content and the evolutionary process comes from Mirsky and Ris's works (1951). They suggest three relationships between DNA content and evolution: i) there might be an increase in DNA content, going from the lower invertebrates to the higher invertebrates; ii) related organisms, such as members of the same family, tend to have similar amounts of DNA; iii) evolution of the land vertebrates may have been accompanied by a decrease in amounts of DNA.

In Orthoptera, such measurements have revealed some evolutionary paths of great interest: Fox (1970), and Willmore and Brown (1975), established values for the DNA content in different species. John and Hewitt (1966) found that significant differences in DNA content exist both between species within the same chromosome group, and between member species of the 2n=17 and 2n=23 groups. In the present work, we found that the 2C nuclear DNA content of C. macrogaster was 10.26 ± 0.16 picograms. The existing data concerning the 2C nuclear DNA content of Orthoptera in Turkey are absent. This necessitates further investigations, the work presented here being the initiation of such studies.

References

1.

J. P. Camacho, M. J. Cabrero, E. Viseras, M. D. Lopez-Leon, J. Navas-Castillo, and J. D. Alche . 1991. G banding in two species of grasshopper and its relationship to C, N, and fluorescens banding techniques. Genome 34:638–643. Google Scholar

2.

J. Fernandez-Piqueras, A. Rodriguez Campos, C. Sentis Castano, and F. Wandosell Jurado . 1982. Pycnogaster cucullata (charp): A polytypic species of tettigonioidea with X0 and neo XY sex determination. Heredity 48:147–150. Google Scholar

3.

J. Fernandez-Piqueras, A. Rodriguez Campos, C. Sentis Castano, and E. Rojo Garcia . 1983. Sex chromosome evolution in the polytypic species Pycnogaster cucullata. Heredity 50:217–223. Google Scholar

4.

J. Fernandez-Piqueras, A. Rodriquez-Campos, C. Sentis-Castano, and E. Rojo-Garcia . 1984. C-heterochromatin in the monospesific genus Baetica (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Caryologia 37:69–76. Google Scholar

5.

D. P. Fox 1970. A non-doubling DNA series in somatic tissues of the locust Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) and Locusta migratoria (Linn). Chromosoma 29:446–461. Google Scholar

6.

J. V. Georgevitch 1933. Recherches sur la Spermiogenese de Callimenus pancici Brun. Bulletin of Academia of Science Materials and Naturalist Series B. Science Naturalist 1:32–45. Google Scholar

7.

J. Gosalvez, C. Lopez-Fernandez, and P. Esponda . 1980. Variability of the DNA Content in Five orthopteran species. Caryologia 33:275–281. Google Scholar

8.

D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable . 1996. Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Inc. USA. Google Scholar

9.

B. John and G. Hewitt . 1966. Karyotype stability and DNA variability in the Acrididae. Chromosoma 20:155–172. Google Scholar

10.

A. Levan, K. Fredga, and A. A. Sondberg . 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position of chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220. Google Scholar

11.

N. Lodos 1991. Türkiye Entomolojisi (Genel Uygulamali ve Faunistik). Cilt I. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayinlari No:. 282–1–353. Google Scholar

12.

A. Mirsky and H. Ris . 1951. The deoxyribonucleic acid content of animal cells and its evolutionary significance. Journal of General Physiology 34:451–462. Google Scholar

13.

J. Navas-Castillo, J. Cabrero, and J. P. M. Camacho . 1986. Heterochromatin variation in Baetica ustulata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) analysed by C and G banding. Heredity 56:161–165. Google Scholar

14.

C. Sentis, J. Santos, G. Visedo, and J. Fernandez-Piqueras . 1988. Equilocal distribution and evolutionary conservation of supernumerary heterochromatin in the Steropleurus mortorelli complex (Orthoptera). Genetica Life Science Advances 7:65–70. Google Scholar

15.

A. T. Sumner 1972. A simple technique for demostrating centromere heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75:304–306. Google Scholar

16.

E. Warchalowska-Sliwa and A. Maryanska-Nadachowska . 1992. Karyotype, C-bands, and NORs locations in spermatogenesis of Isophya brevipennis brunner (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae). Caryologia 45:83–89. Google Scholar

17.

E. Warchalowska-Sliwa and A. G. Bugrov . 1996. Karyotypes and C-banding patterns of Bradyporinae (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). Folia Biologica (Kraków) 44:95–98. Google Scholar

18.

E. Warchalowska-Sliwa 1998. Karyotype characteristics of katydid orthopterans (Ensifera, Tettigoniidae) and remarks on their evolution at different taxonomic levels. Folia Biol. (Kraków) 46:143–176. Google Scholar

19.

P. Willmore and A. Brown . 1975. Molecular properties of orthopteran DNA. Chromosoma 51:337–345. Google Scholar

Figure 1.

Male karyotype of Callimenus macrogaster

i1536-2442-2-24-1-f01.gif

Figure 2.

Idiogram of Callimenus macrogaster

i1536-2442-2-24-1-f02.gif

Figure 3.

C-banding pattern of Callimenus macrogaster, (□) indicates distal C-band

i1536-2442-2-24-1-f03.gif

Figure 4.

G-banding pattern of Callimenus macrogaster.

i1536-2442-2-24-1-f04.gif

Table 1.

Morphometric characteristics of the chromosomes of C. macrogaster based on 10 mitosis

i1536-2442-2-24-1-t01.gif
Sifa Turkoglu and Serdar Koca "Karyotype, C- and G-band Patterns and DNA content of Callimenus (=Bradyporus) macrogaster macrogaster," Journal of Insect Science 2(24), 1-4, (1 November 2002). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.002.2401
Received: 15 March 2002; Accepted: 1 November 2002; Published: 1 November 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top