Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2013 Effects of seed quality and abundance on the foraging behavior of deer mice
Nikhil Lobo, Derek J. Green, John S. Millar
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Seeds are an important food resource for many rodents, but the decision to consume or cache seeds when they are encountered can be influenced by numerous factors such as their abundance, nutritional value, and plant secondary compound (PSC) contents. Although previous studies on rodent foraging behaviors have focused on the effects of specific seed characteristics, the combined impact of seed quality and abundance is unclear. Here, we used artificial food patches in the field to examine the foraging behaviors of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in response to varying abundances of high– and low–nutritional-quality conifer seeds. We also used a variant of giving-up densities to assess mouse perception of the quality of seeds in patches. Mice treated white spruce (Picea glauca) seeds as a high-quality food source in the field, whereas subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) seeds were treated as low quality, corresponding to their nutrient and PSC contents. Observations of foraging behaviors showed a strong interaction between seed abundance and quality on foraging decisions. Caching, but not consumption, rates of spruce seeds varied with seed abundance, but abundance did not influence the frequency or nature of use of fir seeds, which were mostly ignored. High abundance did not confer any value to fir seeds, and even when exaggeratedly abundant relative to naturally available seed densities, mice almost completely disregarded these low-quality seeds as a valuable resource for both current and future use. Our results highlight the relative importance of seed quality in this foraging interaction.

Nikhil Lobo, Derek J. Green, and John S. Millar "Effects of seed quality and abundance on the foraging behavior of deer mice," Journal of Mammalogy 94(6), 1449-1459, (1 December 2013). https://doi.org/10.1644/12-MAMM-A-295.1
Received: 21 November 2012; Accepted: 1 June 2013; Published: 1 December 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top