Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 A special issue of the Journal of Orthoptera Research devoted to Body Size in Orthoptera
Author Affiliations +

Size is perhaps the most conspicuous feature of an organism, and has profound effects on nearly every aspect of organismal design, behavior, and function (Peters 1983, Schmidt-Nielsen 1984, Brown & West 2000, Dial et al. 2008). Across the tree of life, organisms span an impressive 21 orders of magnitude in size, ranging from mycoplasmas (10−13 g) to blue whales (108 g) (Schimidt-Nielsen 1984). In particular, Orthoptera (crickets, katydids, locusts, grasshoppers and wetas) and Phasmatodea (walkingsticks) display some of the most striking variation in size among terrestrial animals, from tiny 2-mm long ant-crickets to giant 357-mm long Malaysian walkingsticks (Otte & Alexander 1983; Wetterer & Hugel 2008; Natural History Museum, London). As evinced by the impressive array of subjects in this special issue on “Body size in Orthoptera”, orthopterans are model organisms in which to study the ecological and evolutionary significance of size.

At present count, there are ~ 24,300 known orthopteran species and ~ 3,500 known phasmatids (Orthoptera Species File, Phasmida Species File), with many more species likely to be unearthed with the continued progression of molecular phylogenetic studies in coming years. Thus far, phylogenetic studies generally support a monophyletic hypothesis for the Orthoptera (Gorochov 1995, Storozhenko 1997, Flook et al. 1999), although much work using modern molecular and statistical approaches remains to be done to resolve the higher-level relationships. The first known orthopteran fossil dates back to the upper Carboniferous period (~ 299 mya, Chopard 1920, Storozhenko 1997, Gorochov 2001), making orthopterans one of the most ancient of insect lineages. And recently, an entirely new order of orthopteroid-like insects, the Mantophasmatodea, was discovered (Klass et al. 2002, Terry & Whiting 2005), suggesting we still have much to learn about this diverse group. These remarkable animals also inhabit virtually every terrestrial biome type, where they are often highly abundant, sometimes spectacularly so, with up to 30,000 individuals per square meter in the case of locust hoppers (Uvarov 1977). Because of their high densities, orthopterans frequently play critical roles in terrestrial food webs as both herbivores (Schmitz 2005) and prey (see Whitman & Vincent 2008), and cause serious economic damage to crops and rangeland (Metcalf et al. 1962, Joern & Gaines 1990, Krall 1994). Understanding the adaptive nature of size variation in this diverse group of insects may not only shed significant light on a number of unresolved issues in ecological and evolutionary biology, but has practical value as well in pest management.

This special issue of JOR on “Body size in Orthoptera”, brings together a diverse array of 32 articles with this lofty goal in mind. The papers explore the full range of size-related topics, from understanding environmental and genetic control of size, to its geographic and sexual expression, to its fitness consequences and evolution, to its role in the conservation of endangered Orthoptera. It addresses how body size is influenced by nearly every aspect of the environment, and in turn influences nearly every conceivable aspect of orthopteran biology, from morphology and physiology to feeding, dispersal, defense, to mating, fecundity, and life-history strategies, and ultimately to fitness itself. We hope that the wide-reaching nature of these papers will help to guide the various avenues of research being explored on size in the Orthoptera, and to integrate these disparate topics into a more cohesive whole.

References

1.

J. H. Brown and G. B. West , editors. (Eds). 2000. Scaling in Biology. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Google Scholar

2.

L. Chopard 1920. Recherches sur la conformation et la développement des derniers segmentes abdominaux des Orthoptères. Thèse, Faculté des Sciences de Paris. Oberthur, Rennes. Google Scholar

3.

K. P. Dial, E. Green, and D. J. Irschick . 2008. Allometry of Behavior. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23:394–401. Google Scholar

4.

P. K. Flook, S. Klee, and C. H. F. Rowell . 1999. Combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and implications for their higher systematics. Systematic Biology 48:233–253. Google Scholar

5.

A. V. Gorochov 1995. System and evolution of the suborder Ensifera (Orthoptera) (in 2 books). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute Russian Academy of Sciences 260. 224 +. 212. pp. [In Russian]. Google Scholar

6.

A. V. Gorochov 2001. The most interesting finds of orthopteroid insects at the end of the 20th century and a new recent genus and species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 10:353–367. Google Scholar

7.

A. Joern and S. B. Gaines . 1990. Population dynamics and regulation in grasshoppers. pp 415–482. In R. F. Chapman and A. Joern , editors. (Eds). Biology of Grasshoppers. Wiley. New York. Google Scholar

8.

K-D. Klass, O. Zompro, N. P. Kristensen, and J. Adis . 2002. Mantophasmatodea: a new insect order with extant members in the Afrotropics. Science 296:1456–1459. Google Scholar

9.

S. Krall 1994. Importance of locusts and grasshoppers for African agriculture and methods for determining crop losses. pp 7–22. In S. Krall and H. Wilps , editors. (Eds). New Trends in Locust Control. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ). Eschborn Germany. Google Scholar

10.

C. L. Metcalf, W. P. Flint, and R. L. Metcalf . 1962. Destructive and Useful Insects. McGraw-Hill. New York. Google Scholar

11.

Natural History Museum. London. World's longest insect revealed  http://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/news/2008/october/worlds-longest-insect-revealed.htmlGoogle Scholar

13.

D. Otte and R. D. Alexander . 1983. The Australian crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monograph 22:1–477. Google Scholar

14.

R. H. Peters 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

16.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen 1984. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

17.

O. J. Schmitz 2005. Scaling from plot experiments to landscapes: studying grasshoppers to inform forest ecosystem management. Oecologia 145:225–234. Google Scholar

18.

S. Y. Storozhenko 1997. Fossil history and phylogeny of orthopteroid insects. pp 59–82. In S. K. Gangwere, M. C. Muralirangan, and M. Muralirangan , editors. (Eds). The Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and their Kin. CAB International. Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar

19.

M. D. Terry and M. F. Whiting . 2005. Mantophasmatodea and phylogeny of the lower neopterous insects. Cladistics 21:240–257. Google Scholar

20.

B. Uvarov 1977. Grasshoppers and Locusts Vol. II. Centre for Overseas Pest Research. London. Google Scholar

21.

J. K. Wetterer and S. Hugel . 2008. Worldwide spread of the ant cricket, Myrmecophilus americanus, a symbiont of the longhorn crazy ant Paratrechina longicornis. Sociobiology 52:157–165. Google Scholar

22.

D. W. Whitman and S. Vincent . 2008. Large size as an anti-predator defense in an insect. Journal of Orthoptera Research 17:353–371. Google Scholar
Douglas W. Whitman and Shawn Vincent "A special issue of the Journal of Orthoptera Research devoted to Body Size in Orthoptera," Journal of Orthoptera Research 17(2), 113-114, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467-17.2.113
Published: 1 December 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
2 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top