Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2006 PREDATORY BEHAVIOR AND DIET OF WINTERING MALE COOPER'S HAWKS IN A RURAL HABITAT
Author Affiliations +

The behavior of North American Accipiter hawks during the nonbreeding season is largely unknown. While several studies have focused on the winter ecology of the Northern Goshawk (Acciptier gentilis, e.g., Widen 1987, Boal et al. 2003, Drennan and Beier 2003), very little information exists about the smaller Cooper's (A. cooperii) and Sharp-shinned (A. striatus) Hawks. Even basic natural history information about these smaller species such as home range use, diet (but see Roth and Lima 2003, Roth et al. 2006), activity and foraging patterns is unavailable for the winter (Rosenfield and Bielefeldt 1993, Dunn and Tessaglia 1994, Bildstein and Meyer 2000). However, wintering Eurasian Sparrowhawks (A. nisus) have been studied by Newton (1986) and Cresswell and colleagues (Cresswell 1994, 1996, Whitfield et al. 1999). Although innovative in many respects, much of this work examines sparrowhawks in unusual habitats, e.g., mudflats, and may not be applicable to the more typical situation of Accipiters hunting in wooded habitats (but see Newton 1986).

We studied wintering Accipiters in part because of the importance of these hawks in conceptual models of behavioral predator-prey interactions (Bertram 1978, Pulliam and Caraco 1984, Houston and McNamara 1999), especially those addressing the “small bird in winter” research paradigm (see Roth et al. 2006). Such studies of small bird behavior typically base predator behavior largely on simplifications and guesswork rather than observation (Lima 2002).

Here, we report the hunting behavior and diet of male Cooper's Hawks as part of a broader study on Accipiters and avian predator-prey interactions in order to assess their similarity to that of Sharp-shinned Hawks. We focused on males because the much larger female Cooper's Hawks were known (in our study area) to take large prey (Roth and Lima 2003) and were uncommon in our rural study site where Sharp-shinned Hawks were frequent (Roth et al. 2005). Although our observations of male hawks were not extensive and sample sizes were small, the information below on diet, hunting success, and general hunting behavior represent the first such published data on wintering Cooper's Hawks in a rural environment.

Study Area and Methods

We studied Cooper's Hawks during the winters of 2001–2004 in rural Vigo County, Indiana, U.S.A. The site was composed primarily of small residential clusters, peripheral city suburbs, agricultural land, and fragmented forest. Trapping was conducted from late November to late January in all years using constantly monitored bal-chatri traps (Berger and Mueller 1959) and bow nets baited with European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). Traps were positioned conspicuously in open areas or flight corridors such as open fields, roadsides, powerline corridors, bird feeders, and potential roost sites. All trapping and marking procedures adhered to the guidelines for the use of animals in research, were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Indiana State University (No. 00-19:TR/SL and 08-21-2003:TR/SL), and followed all federal and state regulations for the collection and marking of wild animals.

We used radiotelemetry to track hawks. We fitted each hawk with an appropriately-sized position-sensitive radiotransmitter (Holohil, Inc., Ontario, Canada; <3% total body mass; 4.2–5.8 g) using the pelvic harness of Rappole and Tipton (1991). The position-sensitive transmitters provided information on the activity of the hawks. A slow pulse rate indicated a perched, stationary hawk. A stationary, rapid pulse rate or fluctuations in pulse rate were indicative of prey consumption: hawks were in a prey-consumption posture with alternating bouts of feeding and vigilance. A steady rapid pulse rate indicated flight; a sudden switch to flight prompted our attention to a possible attack.

We tracked all hawks from vehicles using yagi and whip antennae. Observations occurred from approximately 0.5 hr before sunrise to 0.5 hr after sunset. Each hawk was observed continuously for at least 2 but on average 4.5 (SE  =  0.5) hr daily. The time of day we began tracking each hawk was systematically chosen so that throughout the study each hawk was tracked during all periods of the day. During radiotracking, we recorded the location and predatory behaviors of hawks. Observed attacks were subjectively classified as “open” if made where prey could have detected the approaching hawk at 15 m or more, and “surprise” attacks if made using visual obstructions where prey could not readily detect the hawk during the final 15 m of the attack (Newton 1986, Roth and Lima 2003, Roth et al. 2006, but see Dekker 1980). After a hawk had finished consuming its prey and moved well away from the site, trackers would (if possible) intensively search the area for prey remains for at least 30 min. These searches were conducted only when we could determine a precise fix on the hawk location and when we could obtain access to the property. All remains were compared to specimens in the Indiana State University Vertebrates Collection to verify species. Data for all years were pooled and all statistical analyses were performed with Systat 9.0 (SPSS, Inc. 1998) using parametric and nonparametric tests as appropriate. In the determination of diet, we included prey remains found with or without having observed the attack. Consequently, the number of prey eaten did not necessarily correspond to the number of prey attacked.

To assess the relative risk of predation for different prey species, we estimated the relative abundance of avian prey within the study site during the winters of 2002–2004. Unlimited-distance 5 min point counts (Bibby et al. 1992) were conducted weekly from late December through early March at 48 sites positioned in the center of the study site (see Roth et al. 2006). All counts were performed during the same day in good weather (no precipitation, no strong winds). The order of counts was systematically rotated to avoid temporal biases.

Results and Discussion

We trapped and radiotagged eleven male Cooper's Hawks (2 adults and 9 immatures) during the course of the study. Due to loss of hawks from predation, migration, and accidents (Roth et al. 2005), we were able to collect data on 5 individuals (1 adult and 4 immatures), which were tracked on average 63 (SE  =  17.8) d.

The male Cooper's Hawks in this study attacked and killed a wide range of prey species. Of the 72 attacks known to occur, prey species was identified in 31 cases (Table 1), unknown in 31 cases, and identified to unknown sparrow in the remaining cases (10). Of the 31 attacks on known species, three species, House Sparrows (10, 32.3%), Mourning Doves (Zenaida macroura; 5, 16.1%), and Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis; 5, 16.1%), made up over 60% of the species attacked (Table 1). Similarly, larger species such as Mourning Doves (33.3%) and European Starlings (11.1%) were common in the diet, as were small species such as House Sparrows (22.2%; Table 1). The smallest species in the diet were juncos (20 g) and American Tree Sparrows (Spizella arborea, 20 g). We observed only one mammal (eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus) in the diet of rural Cooper's Hawks, a marked contrast to their diet during the breeding season in some other study areas (Reynolds and Meslow 1984, Kennedy and Johnson 1986, Bielefeldt et al. 1992, but see Boal 1997, Estes and Mannan 2003). This result probably reflects the lack of small diurnal mammalian prey available during the winter.

Table 1

Relative abundance and mass of prey, number of prey attacked, and diet of five male rural Cooper's Hawks near Terre Haute, Indiana, during the winters of 2001–2004. Species are listed in order of decreasing mass.

i0892-1016-40-4-287-t01.gif

With the exception of the Rock Pigeon (Columba livia) and Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus), the species attacked and/or killed by male Cooper's Hawks overlapped completely with that of Sharp-shinned Hawks tracked simultaneously in the same area (Roth et al. 2006). The extent of the similarity of Sharp-shinned and Cooper's Hawk diets is difficult to determine given our small sample size, but it seems clear that rural male Cooper's Hawks represent a predatory risk for small winter birds such as sparrows. In contrast, small prey in the urban habitat in Terre Haute, Indiana, experienced relatively low risk of attack because the urban habitat was dominated by female Cooper's Hawks whose diet generally lacked birds under 70 g (Roth and Lima 2003), although in other areas, small prey such as sparrows and finches may be attacked in urban sites (Boal 1997).

The hunting strategy of male Cooper's Hawks was similar to their urban female counterparts', but differed somewhat from that of Sharp-shinned Hawks. The overall success rate of attacks for male Cooper's Hawks was approximately 23% (7 of 31 attacks with known species and known outcome were successful), which is comparable to success rates for other Accipiters (Newton 1986, Wilson and Weir 1989, Cresswell 1996) including rural Sharp-shinned Hawks (23%, Roth et al. 2006) and urban female Cooper's Hawks (20%, Roth and Lima 2003). In addition, 20 of these 31 attacks were classifiable to attack type (surprise or open). Of these, 9 (45.0%) were surprise attacks and 11 (55.0%) were open attacks, which was similar to results for urban Cooper's Hawks (surprise: 49.2%, open: 50.8%; Roth and Lima 2003). The Cooper's Hawks differed greatly, however, from the Sharp-shinned Hawks tracked in the same habitat, which were much more likely to engage in surprise attacks (85.4% surprise, 14.6% open; Roth et al. 2006). However, unlike in previous studies of Accipiter predatory behavior in which surprise attacks were more successful (surprise: 30% successful, open: 7% successful; Roth and Lima 2003), in this study no significant difference in success was observed between surprise (2 of 9 attacks successful) and open attacks (3 of 11 attacks successful; Fisher exact test, P > 0.90); however, limited statistical power precluded a firm conclusion.

Much remains to be studied about the winter ecology of Accipiter hawks, but our results suggest that both Cooper's and Sharp-shinned Hawks should be considered when investigating the predatory risk experienced by small birds wintering in rural environments.

Acknowledgments

We thank our many field technicians and W. Vetter for their assistance in tracking hawks. We would also like to thank local landowners for their cooperation. We thank C. Boal, J. Castrale, D. Dekker, P. Scott, B. Smithers, and one anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on drafts of this manuscript. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (Grant IBN-0130758), the Indiana Academy of Sciences, and the Department of Ecology and Organismal Biology and School of Graduate Studies at Indiana State University.

Literature Cited

1.

D. D. Berger and H. C. Mueller . 1959. The bal-chatri: a trap for the birds of prey. Bird- Banding 30:18–26. Google Scholar

2.

B. C. R. Bertram 1978. Living in groups: predators and prey. 279–309. in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies , editors. eds. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science Ltd. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar

3.

C. J. Bibby, N. D. Burgess, and D. A. Hill . 1992. Bird census techniques. Academic Press. London, U.K. Google Scholar

4.

J. Bielefeldt, R. N. Rosenfield, and J. M. Papp . 1992. Unfounded assumptions about diet of the Cooper's Hawk. Condor 94:427–436. Google Scholar

5.

K. L. Bildstein and K. Meyer . 2000. Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus). in A. Poole and F. Gill , editors. eds. The birds of North America, No. 482. The Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia, PA U.S.A. and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC U.S.A. Google Scholar

6.

C. W. Boal 1997. An urban environment as an ecological trap for Cooper's Hawks. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Arizona. Tucson, AZ U.S.A. Google Scholar

7.

C. W. Boal, D. E. Andersen, and P. L. Kennedy . 2003. Home range and residency status of Northern Goshawks breeding in Minnesota. Condor 105:811–816. Google Scholar

8.

W. Cresswell 1994. Flocking as an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus. Anim. Behav 47:433–442. Google Scholar

9.

W. Cresswell 1996. Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus, and Merlins, F. columbarius. Ibis 138:684–692. Google Scholar

10.

D. Dekker 1980. Hunting success rates, foraging habits, and prey selection of Peregrine Falcons migrating through central Alberta. Can. Field-Nat 94:371–382. Google Scholar

11.

J. E. Drennan and P. Beier . 2003. Forest structure and prey abundance in winter habitat of Northern Goshawks. J. Wildl. Manage 67:177–185. Google Scholar

12.

E. H. Dunn and D. L. Tessaglia . 1994. Predation of birds at feeders in winter. J. Field Ornithol 65:8–16. Google Scholar

13.

J. B. Dunning 1993. CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL U.S.A. Google Scholar

14.

W. A. Estes and R. W. Mannan . 2003. Feeding behavior of Cooper's Hawks at urban and rural nests in southeastern Arizona. Condor 105:107–116. Google Scholar

15.

A. Houston and J. McNamara . 1999. Models of adaptive behavior. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, U.K. Google Scholar

16.

P. L. Kennedy and D. R. Johnson . 1986. Prey-size selection in nesting male and female Cooper's Hawks. Wilson Bull 98:110–115. Google Scholar

17.

S. L. Lima 2002. Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol 17:70–75. Google Scholar

18.

I. Newton 1986. The Sparrowhawk. T. & A.D. Poyser, Calton, U.K. Google Scholar

19.

H. R. Pulliam and T. Caraco . 1984. Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? 127–147. in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies , editors. eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science Ltd. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar

20.

J. H. Rappole and A. R. Tipton . 1991. New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters to small passerines. J. Field Ornithol 62:335–337. Google Scholar

21.

R. T. Reynolds and E. C. Meslow . 1984. Partitioning of food and niche characteristics of coexisting Accipiters during breeding. Auk 101:761–779. Google Scholar

22.

R. N. Rosenfield and J. Bielefeldt . 1993. Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii). in A. Poole and F. Gill , editors. eds. The birds of North America, No. 75. The Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia, PA U.S.A. and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC U.S.A. Google Scholar

23.

T. C. Roth and S. L. Lima . 2003. Hunting behavior and diet of Cooper's Hawks: an urban view of the small-bird-in-winter paradigm. Condor 105:474–483. Google Scholar

24.

T. C. Roth, S. L. Lima, and W. E. Vetter . 2005. Survival and causes of mortality in wintering Sharp-shinned and Cooper's Hawks. Wilson Bull 117:237–244. Google Scholar

25.

T. C. Roth, S. L. Lima, and W. E. Vetter . 2006. Determinants of predation risk in small wintering birds: a hawk's perspective. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 60:195–204. Google Scholar

26.

SPSS Inc 1998. SYSTAT 9.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL U.S.A. Google Scholar

27.

D. P. Whitfield, W. Cresswell, N. P. Ashmole, N. A. Clark, and A. D. Evans . 1999. No evidence for sparrowhawk selecting redshanks according to size or condition. J. Avian Biol 30:31–39. Google Scholar

28.

P. Widen 1987. Goshawk predation during winter, spring and summer in a boreal forest area of central Sweden. Holarct. Ecol 10:104–109. Google Scholar

29.

J. D. Wilson and A. G. Weir . 1989. Hunting behavior and attack success of a female sparrowhawk between October 1987 and April 1988. Scott. Birds 15:126–130. Google Scholar
Timothy C. Roth II and STEVEN L. LIMA "PREDATORY BEHAVIOR AND DIET OF WINTERING MALE COOPER'S HAWKS IN A RURAL HABITAT," Journal of Raptor Research 40(4), 287-290, (1 December 2006). https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2006)40[287:PBADOW]2.0.CO;2
Received: 24 January 2006; Accepted: 18 September 2006; Published: 1 December 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top