Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
8 October 2020 ISOLATION AND ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIA FROM WILDLIFE IN JAPAN
Justice Opare Odoi, Kenji Ohya, Junji Moribe, Yasuhiro Takashima, Kotaro Sawai, Kyoichiro Taguchi, Hideto Fukushi, Takayuki Wada, Shiomi Yoshida, Tetsuo Asai
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals and are transmitted among the environment, wildlife, livestock, and humans. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of NTM in wildlife. In total, 178 samples of feces (n=131) and tissues (n=47) were collected from 11 wildlife species in Gifu Prefecture and Mie Prefecture, Japan, between June 2016 and October 2018. We isolated NTM from 15.3% (20/ 131) of fecal samples using Ogawa medium, and isolates were identified by sequencing the rpoB and hsp65 genes. The rpoB sequences were compared with those from other strains of human and environmental origin. The NTM isolates were obtained from sika deer (Cervus nippon), wild boar (Sus scrofa), Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata), raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides), masked palm civet (Paguma larvata), and Japanese weasel (Mustela itatsi) and were classified as rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) and slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM). The 12 RGM identified were Mycolicibacterium peregrinum (n=5), Mycolicibacterium fortuitum (n=3), Mycolicibacterium septicum (n=3), and Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile (n=1), and the eight SGM were Mycobacterium paraense (n=4), Mycolicibacter arupensis (n=2), Mycolicibacter virginiensis (n=1), and Mycobacterium nebraskense (n=1). The NTM from wildlife showed ≥99% similarity with strains from different sources including humans. The RGM were susceptible to the antimicrobial agents tested except for M. fortuitum, which was resistant to azithromycin and clarithromycin. The SGM showed multiple drug resistance qualities but were susceptible to amikacin, clarithromycin, and rifabutin. These results indicate that wildlife may be reservoir hosts of NTM in Japan. The presence of antimicrobial-resistant NTM in wildlife suggests that the trends of NTM antimicrobial susceptibility in wildlife should be monitored.

INTRODUCTION

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are organisms residing in natural environments to which humans and animals are exposed (Falkinham 1996). Although they do not cause tuberculosis or leprosy, they are known to be opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals (Biet et al. 2005). Among NTM, Mycobacterium avium–Mycobacterium intracellulare complex (MAC) is the most important etiologic agent to humans and animals (Primm et al. 2004). In fact, NTM have been isolated from humans and livestock, but more attention has been given to MAC, since it is frequently associated with infections in humans (Nishiuchi et al. 2009). The importance of NTM, other than MAC, as an opportunistic infection in humans and animals has also been increasing (Donohue 2018). For example, there have been recent reports of the isolation of Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile from feline panniculitis and isolation of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum and Mycobacterium genavense from migratory birds (Biet and Boschiroli 2014; Patiño et al. 2018).

Based on a recent comparative and phylogenomic study of the genus Mycobacterium, the division of the genus into five distinct monophyletic clades has been proposed. The suggested modifications include an emended genus Mycobacterium (Tuberculosis-Simiae clade) and four other new genera, Mycolicibacterium gen. nov. (Fortuitum-Vaccae clade), Mycolicibacter gen. nov. (Terrae clade), Mycolicibacillus gen. nov. (Triviale clade), and Mycobacteroides gen. nov. (Abscessus-Chelonae clade; Gupta et al. 2018). This comparative analysis has improved our understanding of NTM and clearly places all the rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) and the slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM) in distinct clades.

To provide more information on the ecology and etiology of NTM, we previously presented the genome sequences of Mycolicibacter virginiensis, Mycolicibacter senuensis, and Mycobacterium colombiense isolated from the environment surrounding pigs in Japan (Ito et al. 2018a, b). In addition, we analyzed the genome sequences of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum isolated from the lymph nodes of a pig and from the surrounding soil by in silico DNA-DNA hybridization, and the results showed that the two isolates were 100% identical (Komatsu et al. 2019), implying circulation of NTM between the animal and the surrounding environment. Although NTM cases have been recorded in both humans and animals, the focus has been on humans more than on animals, especially wildlife.

Antimicrobial resistance in NTM from wildlife is critical, since there is the possibility of spreading to humans and livestock. However, the antimicrobial resistance pattern varies according to the species of NTM and often hinders the efficacy of therapeutic regimens (van Ingen et al. 2012). In Japan, antimicrobial resistance has been observed in clinical NTM isolates (Hatakeyama et al. 2017), but antimicrobial susceptibility testing of NTM from wildlife has not been reported.

Wildlife can acquire environmental mycobacteria through contaminated water and food (Kazda et al. 2009). The bacteria then inhabit favorable niches within the animals and can be transmitted through their feces to the environment (Pavlik et al. 2009). We investigated the rate of isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of NTM from wildlife in two prefectures (Gifu and Mie) in Japan and examined the genetic relationship between NTM isolated from wildlife and other sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and design

The samples were collected from wildlife (Table 1) in Gifu Prefecture and Mie Prefecture, located in central Japan (Fig. 1). The two prefectures provide habitats for various wildlife species. The study sites were selected according to the population density of wildlife, with a focus on mammals as potential reservoir hosts in proximity to the human environment. Some wildlife species were annually hunted as part of culling practices in the fields, forests, and rivers in the sampling areas (Table 2). Other animals (e.g., fox and some weasels) were found as roadkill or had died of natural causes. The animals were hunted with traps by authorized hunters between June 2016 and October 2018 in Gifu Prefecture and Mie Prefecture, Japan, with adherence to the Protection and Control of Wild Birds and Mammals and Hunting Management Law (law no. 88, 2002). Samples used in this study were collected at a game-handling establishment during gralloching (removal of the gut) and carcass inspection. Because animals were not killed specifically for this study, no ethical approval was required from the Gifu University ethical committee. However, the Protection and Control of Wild Birds and Mammals Hunting Management Law (law no. 88, 2002) was followed during sample collection. The sample size was dependent on availability and the hunting period.

Table 1

Rate of isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from wildlife species included in this study in Japan. The animals were hunted with traps by authorized hunters between June 2016 and October 2018 in Gifu Prefecture and Mie Prefecture, Japan. Fecal and tissue samples were collected at a game-handling establishment during gralloching (removal of the gut) and carcass inspection and subjected to NTM isolation using 2% Ogawa slant culture tube.

img-z3-2_851.gif

Figure1

The samples were collected from wildlife in Gifu Prefecture and Mie Prefecture, located in central Japan. The two prefectures provide habitats for various wildlife species. The animals were hunted with traps by authorized hunters between June 2016 and October 2018. The study sites were selected according to the population density of wildlife, with a focus on mammals as potential reservoir hosts in proximity to the human environment. The dark shaded portion of the map represents the location of wildlife species from which samples were used.

img-z2-5_851.jpg

Table 2

Species of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) identified from wildlife in Japan. Bacteria identification was achieved by partial sequencing of rpoB and hsp65 gene (Telenti et al. 1993; Adekambi et al. 2003). Except when otherwise stated, all of the isolates were made from samples from animals from Gifu Prefecture, Japan.

img-z4-2_851.gif

Sample collection

In total, 178 samples were investigated, which included 131 fecal samples from the large intestine and 47 tissue samples of the lymph node (n=11), lung (n=9), tonsil (n=9), liver (n=9), spleen (n=6), and kidney (n=3). The samples were collected from Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata), nutria (Myocastor coypus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), raccoon dog (Nyctereutes viverrinus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), Japanese weasel (Mustela itatsi), Siberian weasel (Mustela sibirica), masked palm civet (Paguma larvata), sika deer (Cervus nippon), wild boar (Sus scrofa), and mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) as shown in Table 1. Classification and scientific names of the wildlife species were attributed according to previous literature (Ohdachi et al. 2015).

Isolation of bacteria

Sample collection was conducted by veterinary wildlife specialists to avoid contamination of samples during transportation and at the laboratory (Pate et al. 2016). The fecal and tissue samples were immediately processed using 2% sodium hydroxide (Hibiya et al. 2010; Ito et al. 2018b). The inocula obtained from both tissues and feces were inoculated onto a 2% Ogawa slant culture tube (Kyokuto Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan) and into BBL (Difco Laboratories, Sparks, Maryland, USA) mycobacterium growth indicator tube liquid media supplemented with polymyxin B, amphotericin B, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, and azlocillin (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) and incubated at 37 C for 4 wk. Each single colony formed on the slant tube was subcultured on Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Difco) to obtain distinct colonies (Ito et al. 2018b).

DNA extraction, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis

We extracted DNA using the boiling method (Iwamoto et al. 2012). The first round of PCR was performed to determine the samples that were positive for mycobacteria (Chen et al. 1996). To identify the isolated mycobacteria, sequencing of the rpoB and hsp65 genes (Telenti et al. 1993; Adekambi et al. 2003) was performed. Because of its high discrimination ability, the partial sequence of the rpoB gene was used to compare the isolates obtained from wildlife (Table 2) with previously characterized NTM sequences downloaded from GenBank; isolates with ≥99% identities were considered closely related (de Zwaan et al. 2014). The obtained sequences were analyzed using nucleotide BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2018), and the sequences with a similarity percentage above 98% were downloaded for phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted according to the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) under the total gap removal and Kimura's two-parameter substitution model (Kimura 1980), and it was evaluated by bootstrap analysis based on 1,000 replicates using MEGA software version 7 (Kumar et al. 2016). The tree was rooted using Rhodococcus equi (GenBank no. AY492285) as the outgroup.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of RGM

We used broth microdilution plates containing antimicrobial agents and cation-supplemented Müeller-Hinton broth (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The final concentrations of the antimicrobial agents evaluated for RGM isolates were: clarithromycin (CAM) 0.0015 to 64 µg/mL, azithromycin (AZM) 0.0015 to 64 µg/ mL, sitafloxacin 0.0015 to 64 µg/mL, moxifloxacin 0.0015 to 64 µg/mL, ciprofloxacin 0.0015 to 64 µg/ m, imipenem 1 to 64 µg/mL, meropenem 1 to 64 µg/mL, amikacin (AMK) 2 to 64 µg/mL, and linezolid 2 to 64 µg/mL. An inoculum with a final concentration ranging from 1×105 to 5×105 colony-forming units/mL was prepared according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2011). The plates were inoculated and incubated at 37 C. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined on day 3, 4, or 5 (Hatakeyama et al. 2017). However, to detect inducible resistance in the case of CAM, the incubation period was extended, and the final MIC was determined on day 14 (Brown-Elliott et al. 2012). The MIC breakpoints were interpreted according to CLSI criteria (CLSI 2011) with the exception of sitafloxacin, which was interpreted using the breakpoint proposed by O'Grady et al. (2001).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of SGM

The BrothMIC NTM system (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to evaluate the susceptibility of SGM to streptomycin 0.06 to 128 µg/mL, ethambutol (EB) 0.06 to 128 µg/mL, kanamycin 0.06 to 128 µg/mL, rifampicin 0.06 to 32 µg/mL, rifabutin (RBT) 0.06 to 16 µg/mL, levofloxacin 0.06 to 32 µg/mL, CAM 0.06 to 32 µg/mL, ethionamide 0.06 to 16 µg/mL, and AMK 0.5 to 16 µg/mL, based on the manufacturer's guidelines, which were in accordance with the standard protocol of CLSI. The suspension for inoculation was prepared as described elsewhere (Pang et al. 2017). The plates were incubated at 37 C for 7 d, and the growth end point was determined visually. The MIC breakpoints were interpreted following the guidelines of CLSI (2011) and of the World Health Organization (2008).

RESULTS

Rate of isolation of NTM in wildlife species

Twenty NTM were isolated from fecal samples of six wildlife species, sika deer (32%, 13/41), wild boar (25%, 3/12), Japanese monkey (3%, 1/31), raccoon dog (5%, 1/22), masked palm civet (11%, 1/9), and Japanese weasel (50%, 1/2), resulting in an estimated isolation rate of 15.3% (Table 1). The isolated NTM included four RGM, Mycolicibacterium peregrinum (n=5), Mycolicibacterium fortuitum (n=3), Mycolicibacterium septicum (n=3), and Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile (n=1), and four SGM, Mycobacterium paraense (n=4), Mycolicibacter arupensis (n=2), Mycolicibacter virginiensis (n=1), and Mycobacterium nebraskense (n=1), as shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure2

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates based on the alignment of partial nucleotide sequence (720-base pair) of rpoB gene sequenced using primers described by Adekambi et al. (2003). The representative isolates of NTM identified in this study are preceded with the letters wg, and the source is indicated with the obtained accession numbers in parentheses. The reference NTM strains downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information are in italics, with their respective accession numbers in parentheses. Branching with greater than 55% support from 1,000 bootstrap replicates is shown at the nodes. Horizontal distances indicate genetic distance, and the scale bar represents nucleotide substitution per site.

img-z5-9_851.jpg

Figure3

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates based on the alignment of partial nucleotide sequence (430-base pair) of hsp65 gene sequenced using primers described by Telenti et al. (1993). The isolates of NTM identified in this study are preceded with the letters wg, and the source is indicated with the obtained accession numbers in parentheses. The reference NTM strains downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information are in italics, with their respective accession numbers in parentheses. Horizontal distances indicate genetic distance, and the scale bar represents nucleotide substitution per site.

img-z6-1_851.jpg

The phylogenetic tree of the NTM identified was based on the 430-base pair hsp65 gene (Fig. 3). The hsp65 gene could not clearly differentiate between some members of the Mycolicibacter terrae clade. The sequences of both rpoB and hsp65 were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers shown in Table 2).

Comparison of NTM isolated from wildlife with NTM from other sources—Fortuitum-Vaccae clade

The NTM from wildlife were compared with those from other sources to investigate their genetic relatedness. We found similarity among all the NTM from different sources (Fig. 4). The isolates of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum were 100% identical to each other and were also 100% identical to the reference strain Mycolicibacterium peregrinum strain Y7 (KU861853) isolated from water in Iran. Similarly, the isolates from wildlife identified in this study as Mycolicibacterium fortuitum were 100% identical to each other and to the Mycolicibacterium fortuitum strain garg (KC242461) isolated from water in India. The Mycolicibacterium septicum isolated from wildlife and the reference strain Mycolicibacterium septicum strain 14MF (KY400670) isolated from soil in China were 99% similar. The Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile isolated from wildlife was 100% identical to isolates from humans (France) and soil (UK).

Figure4

Comparison of the nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from the Fortuitum-Vaccae clade isolated from wildlife (this study) and other sources, including human, soil, and water based on nucleotide sequence (720-base pair) of rpoB gene (Adekambi et al. 2003). The isolates of NTM identified in this study are preceded with the letters wg, and the source is indicated with the obtained accession numbers in parentheses. The reference NTM strains downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information are in italics, with their respective source and accession numbers in parentheses.

img-z6-5_851.jpg

Comparison of NTM isolated from wildlife and NTM from other sources—Terrae and Tuberculosis-Simiae clades

Mycobacterium paraense and Mycobacterium nebraskense are members of the Tuberculosis-Simiae clade, while the Terrae clade includes the Mycolicibacter arupensis and Mycolicibacter virginiensis isolates identified in this study. Five isolates were members of the Tuberculosis-Simiae, and three were members of the Terrae clade. The two clades were analyzed together because of the relatively small number of each. Mycobacterium paraense isolated in this study was 100% identical to Mycobacterium paraense strain IEC23 isolated from humans in Brazil. Mycobacterium nebraskense was 100% identical to Mycobacterium nebraskense isolated from humans in the US. Mycolicibacter arupensis and Mycolicibacter virginiensis were also 100% identical to the Mycolicibacter arupensis strain FI-06239 isolated from a human in Italy and the Mycolicibacter virginiensis strain 12MF isolated from soil in China (Fig. 5).

Figure5

Comparison of the nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) belonging to Terrae and Tuberculosis-Simiae clades isolated from wildlife (this study) and other sources, including human, soil, and water, based on the nucleotide sequence (720-base pair) of the rpoB gene (Adekambi et al. 2003). The isolates of NTM identified in this study are preceded with the letters wg, and the source is indicated with the obtained accession numbers in parentheses. The reference NTM strains downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information are in italics, with their respective source and accession numbers in parentheses.

img-z7-1_851.jpg

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of RGM and SGM

Most of the RGM isolated from wildlife were susceptible to all nine antimicrobial agents used in this study (Table 3); the exception was Mycolicibacterium fortuitum, which showed resistance to CAM and AZM. Table 4 shows the MIC and the resistance pattern of the SGM to the antimicrobial agents tested. All the SGM investigated were resistant to more than two antimicrobial agents but susceptible to CAM, RBT, and AMK.

Table 3

Results of the antimicrobial susceptibility test for rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range values were recorded along with the resistance percentage of the various RGM tested. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of RGM was performed by broth microdilution in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI 2011). Except where indicated, MIC values were interpreted based on breakpoints by CLSI (2011).

img-z8-2_851.gif

Table 4

Results of antimicrobial susceptibility test for slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range values were recorded along with the resistance percentage of the various SGM tested. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of SGM was performed by broth microdilution in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI 2011). Except where indicated, MIC values were interpreted based on breakpoints by CLSI (2011).

img-z9-2_851.gif

DISCUSSION

In this study, we successfully isolated 20 NTM from the large intestine of six wildlife species. The isolated NTM included four RGM (Mycolicibacterium peregrinum, Mycolicibacterium fortuitum, Mycolicibacterium septicum, and Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile) and four SGM (Mycobacterium paraense, Mycobacterium nebraskense, Mycolicibacter virginiensis, and Mycolicibacter arupensis). The isolation rate of NTM in feces in this study was 15.3%, which is higher than the rates of 11.8% and 8.4% observed in Slovenia (Pate et al. 2016) and Hungary (Ronai et al. 2016), respectively. The occurrence of NTM in wildlife may be due to their extensive interaction with the environment, indicating that these animals may be reservoir hosts for NTM.

Mycolicibacterium peregrinum was the most frequently isolated RGM from the different wildlife species—sika deer, wild boar, Japanese monkey, Japanese weasel, masked palm civet, and raccoon dog—which strongly suggested that wildlife may acquire Mycolicibacterium peregrinum from their environment. Studies conducted in Japan revealed that the draft genome sequence of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum isolated from a pig affected with lymphadenitis shares close identity with that of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum isolated from the soil of the pig's environment (Komatsu et al. 2019). Moreover, the fact that Mycolicibacterium peregrinum was isolated from other animals (e.g., lion; Panthera leo), and from drinking water (Gcebe and Hlokwe 2017; Mohajeri et al. 2017) indicates that Mycolicibacterium peregrinum can inhabit several environments. In our study, the rpoB gene of the Mycolicibacterium peregrinum isolated from wildlife showed 100% similarity to that of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum isolated from drinking water (Mohajeri et al. 2017).

All the Mycolicibacterium fortuitum isolates in this study were from deer fecal samples, although Mycolicibacterium fortuitum was isolated from other animals, including monkey, in previous studies (Gcebe and Hlokwe 2017). The isolates of Mycolicibacterium fortuitum from wildlife in this study were identical to Mycolicibacterium fortuitum isolated from water (Fig. 4) and formed a cluster with other Mycolicibacterium fortuitum strains isolated from cats (Higgins et al. 2011) and hospital water (Khosravi et al. 2016), which suggests that, regardless of the location, NTM, in particular Mycolicibacterium fortuitum, were widespread in the environment, including among wildlife (Honda et al. 2018). Mycolicibacterium septicum and Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile isolated from wildlife were 100% identical to other isolates from different sources, implying high relatedness among the isolates. In Japan, Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile isolated from dust was not associated with infection (Tsukamura et al. 1985). However, both Mycolicibacterium septicum and Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile have been reported in human and veterinary infection in other countries (Schinsky et al. 2000; Vishkautsan et al. 2016).

Among the wildlife fecal samples observed, diverse NTM were isolated from sika deer. Because NTM are known to inhabit the roots and surface of leaves (Pavlik et al. 2009), it is possible that the high diversity of NTM detected in deer is related to the herbivorous feeding habits of the species. In addition, isolation of NTM, including Mycolicibacterium fortuitum and Mycolicibacter arupensis, from deer has been reported (de Lisle and Havill 1985; Mombeni et al. 2016). Three different NTM (Mycolicibacterium peregrinum, Mycolicibacter virginiensis, and Mycobacterium paraense) were isolated from wild boar samples because wild boar, as omnivores, can acquire NTM from infected carcasses they feed on as well as from the environment including plants (Pavlik et al. 2009). Moreover, Mycobacterium paraense was the most frequently isolated SGM and was isolated from sika deer, wild boar, and Japanese monkey. This finding is enlightening because most of the reported Mycobacterium paraense cases concern humans (Chin'ombe et al. 2016; Poonawala et al. 2017). Mycobacterium paraense was isolated from a human patient in Brazil and was described in 2015 as a novel species that is closely related to Mycobacterium interjectum (da Costa et al. 2015). Given the different sources of isolation in this study, it is possible that Mycobacterium paraense has a broad host range.

Mycolicibacter arupensis and Mycolicibacter virginiensis identified in this study were clustered together (Fig. 5), since they belong to the Terrae clade as described previously (Gupta et al. 2018). Mycolicibacter arupensis was isolated from sika deer fecal samples, while Mycolicibacter virginiensis was isolated from wild boar. The Mycolicibacter virginiensis from wildlife in our study was identical to the Mycolicibacter virginiensis of human and soil origin (Fig. 5). However, it was not identical to the Mycolicibacter virginiensis strain GF75 isolated in Japan (Ito et al. 2018a). The partial rpoB gene—with a region known to have high discrimination power (Higgins et al. 2011; de Zwaan et al. 2014)—was able to identify and highlight the diversity within NTM. The lack of MAC isolation could be due to its absence in the samples or to growth inhibition due to decontamination (Sattar et al. 2018). In this study, we could not isolate NTM from wildlife tissue samples (liver, lungs, lymph node, tonsils, kidney, and spleen), unlike in other studies (Katale et al. 2014; Ghielmetti et al. 2018). This may have been due to the absence of lesions when the tissue samples were macroscopically observed. Considering that identical NTM were isolated from different wildlife species, there is a possibility of wildlife transmitting NTM to the environment of domestic animals. Since wildlife, humans, and other domestic animals can interact, the use of whole-genome analysis will provide additional evidence and deepen our understanding of the genetic relatedness and possible transfer of NTM among humans, domestic animals, and wildlife.

All the 12 RGM tested were susceptible to the fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems used in this study, which is in line with other reports indicating that aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, were effective against RGM (Li et al. 2013; Pang et al. 2015). The observed resistance of Mycolicibacterium fortuitum to CAM and AZM may be due to the presence of erythromycin ribosomal methylase (erm; Brown-Elliott et al. 2012). The Mycolicibacterium peregrinum, Mycolicibacterium septicum, and Mycolicibacterium thermoresistibile isolates in this study were susceptible to all the antimicrobial agents tested in vitro (Table 3); however, in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility is not entirely conclusive.

All the Mycobacterium paraense isolates identified in this study were resistant to streptomycin, EB, and ethionamide (Table 4), similar to the resistance pattern observed in Mycobacterium paraense isolated from humans (da Costa et al. 2015). Mycolicibacter arupensis and Mycolicibacter virginiensis showed a similar resistance pattern and were susceptible to EB, CAM, RBT, and AMK. This finding is in agreement with the results of other studies in which EB, CAM, and RBT were found to be effective against the species of the Terrae clade (Vasireddy et al. 2017).

The study has some limitations. More fecal samples than tissue samples were investigated. However, this does not alter the conclusions of this study. In addition, we did not examine the mechanism underlying the resistance of NTM to the individual antimicrobial agents tested. Furthermore, the partial sequencing of rpoB and hsp65 genes for identification and comparison with other NTM species was not sufficient to establish a strong relationship among NTM from different sources; whole-genome sequences are required to establish this relationship. Thus, this study can be considered a preliminary study.

In conclusion, the isolation of diverse NTM from wildlife fecal samples may not be directly related to high exposure. However, these findings provide insight into the occurrence of NTM in wildlife and indicate that wildlife may be reservoir hosts. Notably, the presence of antimicrobial-resistant NTM is important with respect to human and veterinary medicine, since interaction with wildlife is plausible. Furthermore, the isolation of antimicrobial-resistant NTM in wildlife indicates that the trends of NTM antimicrobial susceptibility in wildlife should be carefully considered and monitored for emergence of resistant strains.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Japan Racing Association (JRA) through JRA livestock industry promotion project grants attributed to K.O., Y.T., and J.M. (H28-29_239) and to K.O. and Y.T. (H29-30_7). The Ito Foundation is kindly acknowledged for funding K.O. through research grants for Meat and Meat Products (H30-60). Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (JP18H04073) funded J.M. and T.A. We thank the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) for the Joint Research Program of the Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University. J.O.O. received a scholarship from the Japanese government (MEXT).

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Adekambi T, Colson P, Drancourt M. 2003. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 41: 5699–5708. Google Scholar

2.

Biet F, Boschiroli ML. 2014. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections of veterinary relevance. Res Vet Sci 97:S69–S77. Google Scholar

3.

Biet F, Boschiroli ML, Thorel MF, Guilloteau LA. 2005. Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC). Vet Res 36:411–436. Google Scholar

4.

Brown-Elliott BA, Nash KA, Wallace RJ Jr. 2012. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:545–582. Google Scholar

5.

Chen ZH, Butler WR, Baumstark BR, Ahearn DG. 1996. Identification and differentiation of Mycobacterium avium and M. intracellulare by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 34:1267–1269. Google Scholar

6.

Chin'ombe N, Muzividzi B, Munemo E, Nziramasanga P. 2016. Molecular identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria in humans in Zimbabwe using 16S ribosequencing. Open Microbiol J 10:113–123. Google Scholar

7.

CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). 2011. Susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria, Norcardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes; Approved Standard ; 2nd Ed., M24-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania, pp. 19–43. Google Scholar

8.

da Costa AR, Fedrizzi T, Lopes ML, Pecorari M, Da Costa WL, Giacobazzi E, da Costa Bahia JR, De Sanctis V, Lima KV, Bertorelli R, et al. 2015. Characterization of 17 strains belonging to the Mycobacterium simiae complex and description of Mycobacterium paraense sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:656–662. Google Scholar

9.

de Lisle GW, Havill PF. 1985. Mycobacteria isolated from deer in New Zealand from 1970–1983. New Zeal Vet J 33:138–140. Google Scholar

10.

de Zwaan R, van Ingen J, van Soolingen D. 2014. Utility of rpoB gene sequencing for the identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria in the Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol 52:2544–2551. Google Scholar

11.

Donohue MJ. 2018. Increasing nontuberculous mycobacteria reporting rates and species diversity identified in clinical laboratory reports. BMC Infect Dis 18:163. Google Scholar

12.

Falkinham JO III. 1996. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 9: 177–215. Google Scholar

13.

Gcebe N, Hlokwe TM. 2017. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in South African wildlife: Neglected pathogens and potential impediments for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:15. Google Scholar

14.

Ghielmetti G, Friedel U, Scherrer S, Sarno E, Landolt P, Dietz O, Hilbe M, Zweifel C, Stephan R. 2018. Nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from lymph nodes and faecal samples of healthy slaughtered cattle and the abattoir environment. Transbound Emerg Dis 65: 711–718. Google Scholar

15.

Gupta RS, Lo B, Son J. 2018. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies robustly support division of the genus Mycobacterium into an emended genus Mycobacterium and four novel genera. Front Microbiol 9:67. Google Scholar

16.

Hatakeyama S, Ohama Y, Okazaki M, Nukui Y, Moriya K. 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of rapidly growing mycobacteria isolated in Japan. BMC Infect Dis 17:197. Google Scholar

17.

Hibiya K, Kazumi Y, Nishiuchi Y, Sugawara I, Miyagi K, Oda Y, Oda E, Fujita J. 2010. Descriptive analysis of the prevalence and the molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium avium complex–infected pigs that were slaughtered on the main island of Okinawa. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 33:401–421. Google Scholar

18.

Higgins J, Camp P, Farrell D, Bravo D, Pate M, Robbe-Austerman S. 2011. Identification of Mycobacterium spp. of veterinary importance using rpoB gene sequencing. BMC Vet Res 7:77. Google Scholar

19.

Honda JR, Virdi R, Chan ED. 2018. Global environmental nontuberculous mycobacteria and their contemporaneous man-made and natural niches. Front Microbiol 9:2029. Google Scholar

20.

Ito T, Maruyama F, Sawai K, Nozaki K, Otsu K, Ohya K. 2018a. Draft genome sequence of Mycobacterium virginiense strain GF75, isolated from the mud of a swine farm in Japan. Genome Announc 6: e00362–18. Google Scholar

21.

Ito T, Sawai K, Kawai M, Nozaki K, Otsu K, Fukushi H, Ohya K, Maruyama F. 2018b. Draft genome sequences of Mycolicibacter senuensis isolate GF74 and Mycobacterium colombiense isolates GF28 and GF76 from a swine farm in Japan. Microbiol Resour Announc 7:e00936–18. Google Scholar

22.

Iwamoto T, Nakajima C, Nishiuchi Y, Kato T, Yoshida S, Nakanishi N, Tamaru A, Tamura Y, Suzuki Y, Nasu M. 2012. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis strains isolated from humans, pigs, and human living environment. Infect Genet Evol 12:846–852. Google Scholar

23.

Katale BZ, Mbugi EV, Botha L, Keyyu JD, Kendall S, Dockrell HM, Michel AL, Kazwala RR, Rweyemamu MM, Van Helden P, et al. 2014. Species diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans, livestock and wildlife in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 14:616. Google Scholar

24.

Kazda J, Pavilik I, Falkinham JO III , Hruska K. 2009. The occurrence of pathogenic and potential pathogenic mycobacteria in animals and the role of environment in the spread of infection. In: The ecology of mycobacteria: Impact on animal's and human's health , Kazda J, Pavilik I, Falkinham JO III , Hruska K, editors. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany, pp. 247–259. Google Scholar

25.

Khosravi AD, Hashemi Shahraki A, Hashemzadeh M, Sheini Mehrabzadeh R, Teimoori A. 2016. Prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in hospital waters of major cities of Khuzestan Province, Iran. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:42. Google Scholar

26.

Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. Google Scholar

27.

Komatsu T, Ohya K, Sawai K, Odoi JO, Otsu K, Ota A, Ito T, Kawai M, Maruyama F. 2019. Draft genome sequences of Mycolicibacterium peregrinum isolated from a pig with lymphadenitis and from soil on the same Japanese pig farm. BMC Res Notes 12:341. Google Scholar

28.

Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. Google Scholar

29.

Li G, Lian LL, Wan L, Zhang J, Zhao X, Jiang Y, Zhao LL, Liu H, Wan K. 2013. Antimicrobial susceptibility of standard strains of nontuberculous mycobacteria by microplate Alamar Blue assay. PLoS One 8:e84065. Google Scholar

30.

Mohajeri P, Yazdani L, Shahraki AH, Alvandi A, Atashi S, Farahani A, Almasi A, Rezaei M. 2017. Verification of frequency in species of nontuberculous mycobacteria in Kermanshah drinking water supplies using the PCR-sequencing method. Microb Drug Resist 23: 359–364. Google Scholar

31.

Mombeni EG, Mosavari N, Gravand MM, Rezai AA, Keshavarz R, Tadayon K, Bakhshi R, Behmanesh R. 2016. First report of Mycobacterium bovis isolation from a European fallow deer (Dama dama dama) in Iran. Iran J Public Health 45:814–816. Google Scholar

32.

National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2018. Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST).  http://blast.ncbi.nih.gov/Blast.cgi. Accessed October 2018. Google Scholar

33.

Nishiuchi Y, Tamura A, Kitada S, Taguri T, Matsumoto S, Tateishi Y, Yoshimura M, Ozeki Y, Matsumura N, Ogura H, et al. 2009. Mycobacterium avium complex organisms predominantly colonize in the bathtub inlets of patients' bathrooms. Jpn J Infect Dis 62:182–186. Google Scholar

34.

O'Grady J, Briggs A, Atarashi S, Kobayashi H, Smith RL, Ward J, Ward C, Milatovic D. 2001. Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of sitafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic, in healthy male and female Caucasian subjects. Xenobiotica 31:811–822. Google Scholar

35.

Ohdachi S, Ishibashi Y, Iwasa MA, Fukui D, Saitoh T. 2015. Chapters Primates; Rodentia; Carnivora; Artiodactyla. In: The wild mammals of Japan , 2nd Ed., Ohdachi S, Ishibashi Y, Iwasa MA, Saitoh T, editors. Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 128–296. Google Scholar

36.

Pang H, Jiang Y, Wan K. 2017. Drug susceptibility testing of 33 reference strains of slowly growing mycobacteria to 19 antimicrobial agents. Biomed Res Int 2017: 1584658. Google Scholar

37.

Pang H, Li G, Zhao X, Liu H, Wan K, Yu P. 2015. Drug susceptibility testing of 31 antimicrobial agents on rapidly growing mycobacteria isolates from China. Biomed Res Int 2015:419392. Google Scholar

38.

Pate M, Zajc U, Kušar D, Žele D, Vengušt G, Pirš T, Ocepek M. 2016. Mycobacterium spp. in wild game in Slovenia. Vet J 208:93–95. Google Scholar

39.

Patiño W LC, Monge O, Suzán G, Gutiérrez-Espeleta G, Chaves A. 2018. Molecular detection of Mycobacterium avium avium and Mycobacterium genavense in feces of free-living scarlet macaws (Ara macao) in Costa Rica. J Wildl Dis 54:357–361. Google Scholar

40.

Pavlik I, Falkinham J, Kazda J. 2009. Transmission of mycobacteria from the environment to susceptible hosts. In: The ecology of mycobacteria: Impact on animal's and human's health , Kazda J, Pavlik I, Falkinham JO III , Hruska K, editors. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany, pp. 283–312. Google Scholar

41.

Poonawala H, Piscitelli VE, Ladutko L, Campbell S. 2017. Misidentification of Mycobacterium paraense as Mycobacterium avium complex by Accuprobe. J Clin Microbiol 55:2283–2284. Google Scholar

42.

Primm TP, Lucero, CA, Falkinham JO III . 2004. Health impacts of environmental mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:98–106. Google Scholar

43.

Ronai Z, Eszterbauer E, Csivincsik A, Guti CF, Dencső L, Janosi S, Dán Á. 2016. Detection of wide genetic diversity and several novel strains among non-avium nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from farmed and wild animals in Hungary. J Appl Microbiol 12:41–54. Google Scholar

44.

Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. Google Scholar

45.

Sattar A, Zakaria Z, Abu J, Aziz SA, Gabriel RP. 2018. Evaluation of six decontamination procedures for isolation of Mycobacterium avium complex from avian feces. PLoS One 13:e0202034. Google Scholar

46.

Schinsky MF, McNeil MM, Whitney AM, Steigerwalt AG, Lasker BA, Floyd MM, Hogg GG, Brenner DJ, Brown JM. 2000. Mycobacterium septicum sp. nov., a new rapidly growing species associated with catheter-related bacteraemia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 575–581. Google Scholar

47.

Telenti A, Marchesi F, Balz M, Bally F, Böttger EC, Bodmer T. 1993. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol 31: 175–178. Google Scholar

48.

Tsukamura M, Mizuno S, Toyama H. 1985. Mycobacterium thermoresistibile from dust of Japanese houses. Microbiol Immunol 29:467–473. Google Scholar

49.

van Ingen J, Boeree MJ, Van Soolingen D, Mouton JW. 2012. Resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Drug Resist Updat 15:149–161. Google Scholar

50.

Vasireddy R, Vasireddy S, Brown-Elliott BA, Wengenack NL, Eke UA, Benwill JL, Turenne C, Wallace RJ Jr. 2017. Mycobacterium arupense, Mycobacterium heraklionense, and a newly proposed species, “Mycobacterium virginiense” sp. nov., but not Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum, as species of the Mycobacterium terrae complex causing tenosynovitis and osteomyelitis. J Clin Microbiol 54:1340–1351. Google Scholar

51.

Vishkautsan P, Reagan KL, Keel MK, Sykes JE. 2016. Mycobacterial panniculitis caused by Mycobacterium thermoresistibile in a cat. JFMS Open Rep 2: 2055116916672786. Google Scholar

52.

World Health Organization. 2008. Policy guidance on drug-susceptibility testing (DST) of second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 20 pp. Google Scholar
© Wildlife Disease Association 2020
Justice Opare Odoi, Kenji Ohya, Junji Moribe, Yasuhiro Takashima, Kotaro Sawai, Kyoichiro Taguchi, Hideto Fukushi, Takayuki Wada, Shiomi Yoshida, and Tetsuo Asai "ISOLATION AND ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIA FROM WILDLIFE IN JAPAN," Journal of Wildlife Diseases 56(4), 851-862, (8 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.7589/2019-10-261
Received: 23 October 2019; Accepted: 25 February 2020; Published: 8 October 2020
KEYWORDS
antimicrobial resistance
Fecal sample
nontuberculous mycobacteria
wildlife
Back to Top