Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis infection, causes morbidity and mortality in free-ranging lions in bTB-endemic areas of South Africa. However, the only currently used diagnostic test is the tuberculin skin test (TST). This test is logistically challenging to perform because it requires immobilization of lions twice in a 72-hr period. Blood-based diagnostic tests, such as serological assays, have been previously reported for M. bovis detection in lion populations, and have the advantage of only requiring a single immobilization. In addition, serological assays can be used for retrospective testing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test free-ranging lions with the STAT-PAKt (Chembio Diagnostics Systems, Medford, NY 11763, USA) and DPPt VetTB (Chembio Diagnostics Systems) serological assays and compare those results with the tuberculin skin test. The serological assays were also used to determine prevalence in bTB-endemic and uninfected lion populations. The results showed that the serological assays could distinguish between M. bovis culture-positive and -negative lions. In addition, antigen-specific humoral responses were present in lions that had clinical signs of bTB disease or were shedding M. bovis antemortem. Although the seroprevalence of M. bovis infection in Kruger National Park lions was similar to that obtained from antemortem mycobacterial culture (4.8 and 3.3%, respectively), it was less than that estimated by the TST (72%). These findings support the hypothesis that assays based on cell-mediated immune responses are more sensitive than serology is in detecting M. bovis infection in lions. However, serological assays can have a role in bTB disease detection in lions and are especially useful for retrospective studies.