Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
18 June 2021 Comparison of the freezing behavior of two liverwort species – Conocephalum salebrosum and Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis
Rena T. Schott, Martin Nebel, Anita Roth-Nebelsick
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Extracellular ice formation as a dehydrating agent is generally acknowledged as an important element of freezing avoidance in frost hardy plants, preventing the development of lethal ice crystals within living cells. While many reports on extracellular ice formation do exist for vascular plants, not much is known on ice formation for liverworts. In this study, ice formation was studied for two liverwort species occurring in climate zones with winter freezing, Conocephalum salebrosum and Marchanthia polymorpha L. subsp. ruderalis, together with taxon-specific ice nucleating temperature and seasonal concentration of ice nucleating agents. Samples were collected in late autumn from various sites in south west Germany. Afterwards the collected liverwort specimen were cultivated and acclimated in pots in the inner courtyard of the State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Germany. Ice formation was observed in the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) within the air chambers of both species, with ice crystals growing out of the air chamber pores, as well as random ice crystal formation on various sites on the ventral side for both taxa. The growing ice sheets led to dehydration particularly of the parenchymatous cells. For both taxa, the observations support the relevance of extracellular ice formation for surviving freezing conditions but the experiments also indicate a better adaptation of C. salebrosum to frost.

There are different strategies and mechanisms in frost hardy plants to survive freezing temperatures in seasonal climates. Dehydration of living cells by extracellular ice formation is a common phenomenon in frost hardy vascular plants and can be found in many different tissues, such as petioles (Prillieux 1869, McCully et al. 2004), stems (Schaffner 1908, Schott et al. 2017), leaves (Ball et al. 2004) and twigs (Schott and Roth-Nebelsick 2018). After formation of ice in intercellular air spaces, the ice acts as dehydrating agent due to its low water potential (Guy 1990). Formation of ice in plants, including mosses and liverworts, is triggered by heterogeneous nucleation (Sakai and Larcher 1987, Gusta and Wisniewski 2013, Moffett 2015). Different kinds of ice nucleating agents were found, such as bacteria, fungi or macromolecules (Lindow et al. 1978, Wisniewski et al. 2002) and can also be produced by the plants themselves (Brush et al. 1994). Also, formation of plant-internal ice can be nucleated by external ice which spreads into the plant through, for example, stomata (Wisniewski and Fuller 1999). The concentration of internal ice nucleating agents in vascular plants was demonstrated to show seasonal changes (Kishimoto et al. 2014a, b, Schott and Roth-Nebelsick 2018).

For cryptogams, much less information is available on plant internal ice formation or the activity of ice nucleating agents. For Ceratodon purpureus, a world-wide distributed moss, it was shown that this moss species avoids internal freezing by rapid dehydration (Lenné et al. 2011). To the authors' knowledge, not many researchers focused on the extracellular freezing of liverworts (Moffet 2015). The focus of this contribution is on freezing processes in liverworts and possible extracellular ice formation. Both dioicous species (Conocephalum salebrosum Szweyk., Buczk. and Odrzyk; Marchanthia polymorpha L. subsp. ruderalis Bischl. and Boisselier) as members of the complex thalloid liverworts (Paton 2014) show a highly developed thallus with a costa, an upper and lower epidermis, several layers of parenchymal cells, air chambers, oil bodies in separate cells without chloroplasts, conducting tissue, ventral scales and dimorphic rhizoids, both smooth and with tubercles on the walls. As further described below, the considered taxa differ with respect to distribution and habitat, and this may possibly imply different responses to freezing temperatures.

Within this contribution, freezing behavior and related structural details of C. salebrosum and M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis were studied with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Additionally interspecific ice nucleation temperature (INT) and ice nucleation activity (INA) were determined, as well as the water content. The INT median (TINT) as well as the median cumulative ice nucleation per gram fresh weight or per water volume provide species-specific information of ice nucleation activity at defined temperatures, including seasonal changes. Both parameters indicate how readily ice forms under subzero conditions. Therefore the difference between season-specific data (winter and spring) of naturally acclimated material is expected to indicate, firstly, an acclimation to winter freezing and, secondly, the loss of this acclimation during spring. In frost hardy species, freezing is usually promoted. These values are important for analysis of frost hardiness and the comparison of different species, tissues, ontogenetic changes and seasonal differences with respect to frost resistance and susceptibility to freezing.

Material and methods

Plant material

Conocephalum salebrosum is a holarctic liverwort species (Szweykowski et al. 2005) with a distribution known so far to comprise Europe, including Scandinavia, East Asia and North America, reaching up to high latitudes. C. salebrosum occurs in big patches on mildly acid to basic, often humus rich soils on moist banks, rocks and stonework or on thin soil on limestone, typically on deeply shaded sites.

Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis as a classic research plant (Shimamura 2016) is distributed in temperate regions in Europe, Macaronesia, North America, Asia and introduced to South Africa. Growing on a variety of substrates, from moist to rather dry loamy, gravelly or peaty, acid or basic and often nutrient-rich soils, M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis is a horticultural weed in exposed or shaded man-made habitats. This species is also a characteristic pioneer on gravel, paths, waste ground and bonfire sites, in gardens, parks and nurseries, also in and around glasshouses occasionally in woodlands and beside streams. The appearance is often sporadic (Paton 2014).

Table 1.

Description of the samples used for the experiments (°C: degree Celsius).

img-z2-12_01.gif

To the authors' knowledge, no explicit data are available, a certain difference in freezing tolerance might be expected from the different distribution of both species. All species sampled were collected in late autumn in south west Germany (Conocephalum salebrosum: Erms Valley (48°26′35.844″N, 9°27′43.523″E); Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis in green houses of Hohenheim Gardens (48°42′34.272″N, 9°12′34.164″E) and breeder Hummel (48°48′23.616″N, 9°6′56.087″E)). Afterwards samples were cultivated and acclimated in pots in the inner courtyard of the State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Germany (48°47′35.909″N, 9°11′25.224″E).

During winter, the cultivated material was used to prepare frozen samples as well as for the freezing experiments in the ESEM and to determine the ice nucleation temperature. After being naturally exposed to temperatures < 5°C for some days, including at least three days below 0°C, the cultivated material was naturally acclimated to lower (winter) temperatures. Otherwise, with un-acclimated material, freezing experiments may lead to artifacts (Ball et al. 2004). The remaining cultivated plants in the pots in the inner courtyard were also used for the ice nucleation temperature determination in spring after de-acclimation. De-acclimation occurred at temperatures above 5°C. During the time of the study, it was sufficiently humid so that the regularly checked pot substrate did not need any additional watering. Table 1 gives an overview of the used samples in each experiment.

Determination of ice nucleation temperature and water content

For comparison of the species-specific ice nucleation temperature, for the acclimated as well as the de-acclimated state, measurements were conducted during winter and spring.

Kishimoto et al. (2014a, b) devised a method to determine ice nucleation temperature (INT) which also provides the content of ice nucleating particles within a sample (ice nucleation activity – INA). In this contribution, a variation of the original method was applied, as described in Schott and Roth-Nebelsick (2018). The basic procedure is as follows. Firstly, 40 glass tubes containing 0.2 ml ultrapure (type 1) water were autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min as described by Kishimoto et al. (2014a, b). A sample of each species was brought into the laboratory and divided into 20 portions (weight of each portion: C. salebrosum: 32.3–66 mg; M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis: 33.1–57.3 mg). Before the experiment, the ventral side of the liverwort samples were carefully cleaned with a razor blade to remove as much substrate as possible.

In winter, samples from completely frozen plants required a storage at a cold non-freezing temperature (+3°C) in a custom-built freezer overnight before the INT experiment. The freezer, equipped with a triple glazed door and a temperature accuracy of ± 1.2°C, was also used for all freezing experiments. Each glass tube received one sample portion, meaning that one experiment included 20 replications for each species. The whole experiment was repeated each four times in winter and spring. For each measurement, eight glass tubes solely filled with autoclaved ultrapure (type 1) H2O served as control. To be sure that the ultrapure (type 1) H2O would not influence the results, the ice nucleation temperature of the water control was determined in a pre-experiment, with a result of -16.45°C ± SE 0.05 (Schott and Roth-Nebelsick 2018).

Figure 1.

(A) Distribution of ice nucleation activity (INA) shown as cumulative percentage of frozen glass tubes (n = 20). (B) Cumulative ice nucleation showing K′(T) (ice nuclei per g fresh weight) for C. salebrosum and M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis in winter and spring.

img-z3-5_01.jpg

All glass tubes, with and without tissue samples, were placed into the precooled (0°C) freezer. The samples were cooled down by 1° every 20 min while the already frozen tubes were counted during each step. To support reliable identification of frozen samples, the glass tubes were placed onto a small wooden shelf with a black background. This arrangement provided sufficient contrast between sample and background to observe ice crystal growth. The whole experiment was repeated each four times (as described by Kishimoto et al. 2014a, b). A pre-experiment determined the minimum weight required for each sample. In preexperiments, the temperature development of the shelf in the freezer was measured to exclude any bias by the equipment. The experimental procedure applied in this study was a in following explained variation of the original method, as described in Schott and Roth-Nebelsick (2018), because the limited amount of available cultivated liverworts required a reduction of the water volume from originally 0.5 ml to 0.2 ml and also reduction of replications from 40 to 20.

Figure 2.

Distribution of ice nucleation activity of C. salebrosum and M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis in glass tubes (n = 20) in winter and spring.

img-z4-1_01.jpg

The results provide the median TINT of ice nucleating temperature and the ice nuclei concentration per g fresh weight, which provide species-specific values as well as an indication for the degree of acclimation (Kishimoto et al. 2014b). The results of the calculation of the cumulative concentration (per unit mass of the sample) of ice nuclei that were active at all temperatures warmer than T (K′(T)) (Vali 1995) can best be shown and compared with literature results on the basis of a log 10 (K′(T)) graph. The number of active ice nuclei indicate specific freezing events.

Table 2.

Results of ice nucleation temperature and median of ice nuclei active at -7°C for C. salebrosum and M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis (°C: degree Celsius).

img-ARK_01.gif

For the determination of the water content, 10 samples from each species were weight in the fresh state, and then dried to constant weight in a drying cabinet.

Microscopic a nalysis

SEM

For observation of the structure of the liverworts before freezing, freshly cut samples were transferred into pure methanol for 10 min, then into pure ethanol for 30 min. The last step was repeated. Afterwards the samples were critical point dried (Leica EM CPD300). The procedure was described by Talbot and White (2013) and largely prevents deformation of living plant tissues. The dried samples were mounted on SEM stubs by using special adhesive tape and sputtered with gold palladium (sputter layer thickness 6 nm) before examination in the SEM (ZeissEVO LS 15).

To study plant structure after freezing, samples of both species were cooled in the custom-built freezer. Temperature was reduced from 0°C to -10°C with a cooling rate of 2° h-1, a frequent cooling rate under natural conditions (Steffen et al. 1989). After reaching -10°C plants were stored within the freezer for ∼ 3 days before they were prepared together with the fresh samples for SEM.

Table 3.

Water content and standard deviation (SD) in winter for 10 samples in 2 repetitions each of C. salebrosum and M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis.

img-z5-2_01.gif

ESEM

With the ESEM, allowing for maintaining controlled levels of humidity and temperature inside the sample chamber, it is possible to observe samples in a native state during freezing. For the ESEM freezing experiments with fresh, unfrozen and untreated native samples, the same SEM equipment was used as described above, but run in ESEM mode, including a precooled peltier at 0°C, apressure of ∼ 259 Pa and a humidity of ∼90%. The temperature was lowered to -10°C.

For this study another addon regulating the temperature inside the analysis chamber was used for the experiments. Appearance of ice crystals and their development was detected and observed. The ESEM conditions suitable for initiating and observing freezing processes were selected according to Konrad et al. (2019).

Figure 3.

Cross sections of freshly (A–D) and frozen (E–F) dried C. salebrosum (SEM). AC: air chamber; AP: air pores; E: epidermis; HAC: hyaline apical cell; P: parenchyma. Scale bars: 200 µm.

img-z5-10_01.jpg

Results

Comparison of the ice nucleation activity

INT data of Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis showed smaller differences between winter and spring samples than Conosephalum salebrosum (Fig. 1A) with fewer ice nuclei active at the same temperature, and particularly so for the winter samples (Fig. 1B). Both species show a broader distribution of freezing temperatures in spring (Fig. 2). During winter, the median INT was lower for M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis (-7.35°C ± 0.47) than for C. salebrosum (-5.54 ± 0.44) (Table 2). In spring, no significant differences between M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis (-6.8°C ± 0.46) and C. salebrosum (6.23°C ± 0.45) could be detected. The median for active ice nuclei (at -7°C) for C. salebrosum was substantially lower in spring compared to winter. Both species showed a quite similar water content (Table 3).

Figure 4.

ESEM images of different steps during artificial freezing events (-10°C) with a humidity of 90% and 259 Pa. (A–D) C. salebrosum upper surface. (E–H) C. salebrosum lower surface. Black arrows highlight the ice crystal growth. Scale bars: 100 µm.

img-z6-1_01.jpg

Microscopic observations

Conocephalum salebrosum

When comparing cross sections of samples of C. salebrosum prepared from the unfrozen and frozen state (Fig. 3), a slight deformation of the epidermis and the parenchymatous tissue was visible for the frozen samples. The chlorenchyma within the air chamber as well as the hyaline apical cells below the air chamber pores show nearly no deformation (Fig. 3C–E). The parenchyma cells adjacent to the chlorenchyma appear to be smaller than the rest of the parenchyma.

Observation of the freezing process of C. salebrosum in ESEM reveals a quite interesting pattern (Fig. 4). During cooling, ice crystals appear at the entrance of the air chamber pore, originating from tissue water (Fig. 4B–D). Next to these growing ice crystals, ice can occur around the external base of the air pores (Fig. 4C–D). Ice crystals can also form above the junctions between air chamber and epidermis (Fig. 4D). Finally, an ice sheet forms with additional ice possibly originating at other sites of the thallus (Fig. 4D). On the ventral side of the thallus, ice forms randomly at different sites and starts to grow and merge until it covers the surface completely (Fig. 4E–H).

Marchanthia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis

The SEM cross sections of M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis display smaller epidermis cells and large parenchyma cells in the central region of the thallus, close to the chlorenchyma cells, while parenchymatous cells close to the ventral side are smaller (Fig. 5). Although preparation of the frozen samples was difficult because the frozen tissue disintegrated stronger compared to C. salebrosum, the SEM images indicate a shrinkage of tissue, particularly for the larger parenchyma cells (Fig. 6E–F).

During the freezing process in the ESEM, ice crystals grow mainly out of the air chamber pores (Fig. 6B-D), similar to C. salebrosum. On the ventral side, ice formation started randomly at many locations on the surface and finally covered the ventral surface (Fig. 6F–H).

Figure 5.

Cross sections of freshly (A–D) and frozen (E–F) dried M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis (SEM). AC: air chamber; E: epidermis; P: parenchyma. Scale bars: 200 µm.

img-z7-11_01.jpg

Interspecific comparison

For both taxa, SEM images indicate shrinkage of the frozen samples compared to the unfrozen state, and particularly so for the larger parenchyma cells. It also appears that freezing-induced shrinkage was higher in M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis, compared to C. salebrosum.

The ESEM experiments highlighted extracellular freezing on the surface (Fig. 4, 6, 7) of both sides for the two species. On the dorsal side, ice crystals grew rapidly out of air chamber pores in both taxa. Particularly in C. salebrosum, the dorsal side was finally covered by an ice sheet.

In both species, an ice cover developed swiftly on the ventral sides, starting from random ice crystal formation at many sites.

Discussion

Results of INT and INA experiments support the notion of a better adaptation of Conocephalum salebrosum to frost, as compared to Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis, because freezing appears to be slightly promoted in C. salebrosum, particularly during the winter (Kishimoto et al. 2014a, b, Schott and Roth-Nebelsick 2018). This difference may be related to the different distribution of both taxa, indicating the ability of C. salebrosum to cope better with harsher habitats, such as in regions with high elevation. However, this is quite conjectural at the moment.

Figure 6.

ESEM images of different steps during artificial freezing events (-10°C) with a humidity of 90% and 259 Pa. (A–D) M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis upper surface. (E–H) M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis lower surface. Black arrows highlight important ice formations. Scale bars: 20 µm.

img-z8-1_01.jpg

Although internal ice formation could not be observed with the methods applied in this study, evidence for plant-internal and intercellular ice formation could be found, because ice crystals grew directly out of the air chambers, and also on the ventral thallus side. Ice growing out of air chambers therefore originates from water of internal tissues, which fed ice crystal growth, thereby dehydrating the cells. After a while a massive dorsal ice sheet was formed. The air chambers as preferential sides of ice crystal formation can be explained with the presence of a quite watertight cuticle on the epidermis in Marchantiales, including hydrophobic ledges preventing water to enter the pores (Schönherr and Ziegler 1975). In C. salebrosum a strong water loss of internal tissues is indicated. Possibly, the origin of the massive sheet was the hyaline thallus margin, or the junctions between air chamber walls and epidermis, which form distinct furrows in this taxon (Szweykowski et al. 2005). However, it was not possible within these observations to detect the water source for the ice sheets.

Figure 7.

upper surface of current year (A) and older (C) C. salebrosum and of current year (B) and older (D) M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis (ESEM) with a humidity of 80% and ∼ 700 Pa and a peltier temperature of 5°C. Scale bars: 100 µm.

img-z9-1_01.jpg

In contrast to the dorsal site, ice started to form irregularly on the ventral sides of the thalli in both taxa, seemingly randomly at various spots, merging rapidly into ice sheets. This is consistent with the lack of a cuticle at the ventral sides and therefore the absence of a water barrier. Parallel to the ice growth on both sides of the thallus, internal tissues became dehydrated, and particularly so parenchymatous cells. Since the thalli are quite shallow, the ice bodies on both thallus sides probably caused dehydration of the internal tissues. The chlorenchymatous tissue as well as – in C. salebrosum – the flask-shaped hyaline cells did not show considerable shrinkage. Possibly, these cells show a higher mechanical stiffness. As described by Konrad et al. (2019), water loss due to an adjacent ice body decreases with increasing cell wall stiffness. When layers of stiffer cells are located besides ‘softer’ cell layers, then water will be drawn preferentially from the softer cells towards ice bodies which then grow on expense of these cells (Konrad et al. 2019). Increasing dehydration leads at first to rising solute concentration within the cells and therefore to a further decreasing freezing point. Finally, cells may dehydrate strongly.

It is therefore possible that the chlorenchymatous cells of C. salebrosum and M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis are mechanically more stable than the parenchymatous cells. When layers of stiffer cells are located besides ‘softer’ cell layers, then water will be drawn preferentially from the softer cells towards ice bodies which then grow on expense of these cells (Konrad et al. 2019). Water is absorbed again by the cells upon thawing, as it can be observed usually for frost hardy plants with extracellular freezing (Niklas 1989, McCully et al. 2004, Roden et al. 2009). In the same manner, melting water could then be used by the liverworts as a water reservoir in spring (Moffet 2015).

Although the observations refer to the specific environment of the cultivation site, the conditions met the characteristic requirements for cold acclimation.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Cristina Gasco Martin for her assistance with the SEM and ESEM. Funding – This work has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre (SFB/Transregio) 141 ‘Biological Design and Integrative Structures'/A01.

References

1.

Ball, M. C., Canny, M. J., Huang, C. X. et al. 2004. Structural changes in acclimated and unacclimated leaves during freezing and thawing. – Funct. Plant Biol. 31: 29–40. Google Scholar

2.

Brush, R. A., Griffith, M. and Mlynarz, A. 1994. Characterization and quantification of intrinsic ice nucleators in winter rye Secale cereale leaves. – Plant Physiol. 104: 725–735. Google Scholar

3.

Gusta, L. V. and Wisniewski, M. 2013. Understanding plant cold hardiness: an opinion. – Physiol. Plant. 147: 4–14. Google Scholar

4.

Guy, C. L. 1990. Cold acclimation and freezing stress tolerance: role of protein metabolism. – Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 41: 187–223. Google Scholar

5.

Kishimoto, T., Sekozawa, Y., Yamazaki, H.et al. 2014a. Seasonal changes in ice nucleation activity in blueberry stems and effects of cold treatments in vitro. – Environ. Exp. Bot. 106: 13–23. Google Scholar

6.

Kishimoto, T., Yamazaki, H., Saruwatari, A. et al. 2014b. High ice nucleation activity located in blueberry stem bark is linked to primary freeze initiation and adaptive freezing behaviour of the bark. – AoB Plants 6: plu044. Google Scholar

7.

Konrad, W., Schott, R. and Roth-Nebelsick, A. 2019. A model for extracellular freezing based on observations on Equisetum hyemale. – J. Theor. Biol. 478: 161–168. Google Scholar

8.

Lindow, S. E., Arny, D. C. and Upper, C. D. 1978. Distribution of ice nucleation-active bacteria on plants in nature. – Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36: 831–838. Google Scholar

9.

Lenné, T., Bryant, G., Hocart, C. H. et al. 2011. Freeze avoidance: a dehydrating moss gathers no ice. – Plant Cell Environ. 33: 1–11. Google Scholar

10.

McCully, M. E., Canny, M. J. and Huang, C. X. 2004. The management of extracellular ice by petioles of frost-resistant herbaceous plants. – Ann. Bot. 94: 665–674. Google Scholar

11.

Moffet, B. F. 2015. Ice nucleation in mosses and liverworts. – Lindbergia 38: 14–16. Google Scholar

12.

Niklas, K. J. 1989. Extracellular freezing in Equisetum hyemale. – Am. J. Bot. 76: 627–631. Google Scholar

13.

Paton, J. A. 2014. The liverwort flora of the British Isles. – Brill Academic Pub. Google Scholar

14.

Prillieux, M 1869. Effet de la gelée sur les plantes. Formation de glaçons dans les tissus des plantes. – Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 16: 140–152. Google Scholar

15.

Roden, J., Canny, M., Huang, C. et al. 2009. Frost tolerance and ice formation in Pinus radiata needles: ice management by the endodermis and transfusion tissues. – Funct. Plant Biol. 36: 180–189. Google Scholar

16.

Sakai, A. and Larcher, W. 1987. Frost survival of plants. Responses and adaptation to freezing stress. – Springer. Google Scholar

17.

Schaffner, J. H. 1908. The air cavities of equisetum as water reservoirs. – Ohio Nat. IX: 393–394. Google Scholar

18.

Schönherr, J. and Ziegler, H. 1975. Hydrophobic cuticular ledges prevent water entering the air pores of liverwort thalli. – Planta 124: 51–60. Google Scholar

19.

Schott, R. T. and Roth-Nebelsick, A. 2018. Ice nucleation in stems of trees and shrubs with different frost resistance. – IAWA J. 39: 177–190. Google Scholar

20.

Schott, R. T., Voigt, D. and Roth-Nebelsick, A. 2017. Extracellular ice management in the frost hardy horsetail Equisetum hyemale L. – Flora 234: 207–214. Google Scholar

21.

Shimamura, M. 2016. Marchantia polymorpha: taxonomy, phylogeny and morphology of a model system. – Plant Cell Physiol. 57: 230–256. Google Scholar

22.

Steffen, K. L., Arora, R. and Palta, J. P. 1989. Relative sensitivity of photosynthesis and respiration to freeze-thaw stress in herbaceous species: importance of realistic freeze-thaw protocols. – Plant Physiol. 89: 1372–1379. Google Scholar

23.

Szweykowski, J., Buczkowska, K., Odrzykoski, I. J. 2005. Conocephalum salebrosum (Marchantiopsida, Conocephalaceae) – a new Holarctic liverwort species. – Plant Syst. Evol. 253: 133–158. Google Scholar

24.

Talbot, M. J. and White, R. G. 2013. Methanol fixation of plant tissue for scanning electron microscopy improves preservation of tissue morphology and dimensions. – Plant Methods 9: 36. Google Scholar

25.

Vali, G. 1995. Principles of ice nucleation. – In: Lee, W. et al. (eds), Biological ice nucleation and its applications. APS Press, pp. 1–28. Google Scholar

26.

Wisniewski, M. and Fuller, M. 1999. Ice nucleation and deep supercooling in plants: new insights using infrared thermography. – In: Margesin, R. and Schinner, F. (eds), Cold-adapted oragnisms: ecology, physiology, enzamology and molecular biology. Springer,pp. 105–118. Google Scholar

27.

Wisniewski, M., Fuller, M., Glenn, D. M. et al. 2002. Extrinsic ice nucleation in plants. – In: Li, P. H. and Palva, E. T. (eds), Plant cold hardiness. Springer, pp. 211–221. Google Scholar
© 2021 The Authors. This is an Open Access article This work is licensed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) . The license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Rena T. Schott, Martin Nebel, and Anita Roth-Nebelsick "Comparison of the freezing behavior of two liverwort species – Conocephalum salebrosum and Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis," Lindbergia 2021(1), (18 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01135
Accepted: 20 April 2021; Published: 18 June 2021
KEYWORDS
ESEM
frost hardiness
ice formation
ice nucleation
SEM
Back to Top