Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
24 October 2023 Contrasting ecological and biological characteristics of high-altitude populations of Drepanocladus turgescens in the Vanoise national park
N. Ambec, T. Delahaye, V. Hugonnot
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Drepanocladus turgescens is a calciphilic arctic-alpine moss species that is highly endangered in central Europe. Lowland populations are at risk of extinction, while high alpine populations have a favourable conservation status. We studied ten high-altitude populations of D. turgescens in Vanoise national park, French Alps, at the south-western margin of its range. The microtopography, substrate depth, vascular plant and bryophyte species cover, and water physico-chemical properties were sampled in the field. Sexuality and branching were studied in the laboratory. In the high alpine area, the moss either thrives on a sparsely vegetated, mineral percolating substrate where female gametangia are regularly produced on mostly unbranched stems or on peaty substrate, where individuals are sterile and tend to branch out. Competition is suggested as the main driver of the species' occurrences. We found neither male gametangia nor any sporophytes, a situation typical for most of the Alps. The high-altitude populations of D. turgescens likely episodically recruit following exceptional sporophyte production in the Alps, and by vegetative fragmentation. Management actions removing competitors may benefit the persistence of the moss in sites where the peat layer exceeds 20 cm deep.

Introduction

Although wetlands are increasingly recognised as playing a fundamental role in our environment by the scientific community, they have been reduced by more than 50% since industrialisation (Davidson 2014). The functioning and dynamics of these wetlands are increasingly well understood (Eller et al. 2021), but there is a lack of knowledge on one of their most iconic taxonomic groups, bryophytes, in comparison with vascular plants (Becker Scarpitta et al. 2017).

Accounting for 70% of these wetlands, peatlands are largely populated by bryophytes (Chapman et al. 2003, Moor et al. 2017, Vitt and House 2021). Within the bryophyte taxa, which are dependent on wetlands and therefore water-dependent, we find brown mosses (Moore 1989, Kuhry and Turunen 2006, Vitt and House 2021). Brown mosses are an informal name for species belonging to the Calliergonaceae, Amblystegiaceae or Scorpidiaceae families, whose taxonomy was – and still is – being actively studied (Hedenäs et al. 2005, Kučera and Hedenäs 2020, Ignatova et al. 2021). Brown mosses frequently dominate temperate, boreal and arctic wetlands in what is known as rich fens (McBride and Scottish Natural Heritage 2011, Vitt and House 2021). These mosses have a critical ecological function because they initiate the process of terrestrialisation of aquatic environments by initiating turfigenesis (Tveit et al. 2020). They are often dioecious (Hedenäs 1993) and, as such, often do not have structures dedicated to vegetative reproduction (Bisang and Hedenäs 2005). The biology of these species is not well known and is still rarely studied for many aspects such as reproduction, ecological needs and competition (Bisang et al. 2008, Campbell et al. 2019, Hedenäs and Bisang 2019, Hedenäs et al. 2021). This is notably the case for Drepanocladus turgescens (T.Jensen) Broth., which is an arctic-alpine species (Karczmarz 1971) widely distributed in the circumpolar region, with disjunct occurrences in Asia, Africa and South America (Karczmarz 1971, Hedenäs 2002, 2003). Drepanocladus turgescens is an amphibious species that is dioecious and rarely develops sporophytes, which are produced cyclically and show dependence on environmental and climatic variables (Hedenäs 2002, Hedenäs et al. 2016, Hedenäs and Bisang 2019).

Drepanocladus turgescens is red-listed in many European countries. While D. turgescens is assessed as of least concern (LC) in Europe (Hodgetts et al. 2019), its status ranges from Extinct to LC in different countries (Table 1). Although human activities may also generate favourable habitats for this species (Holler 1877, Schäfer-Verwimp 1985, Krajewski 2017), such activities seem to be at the root of its decline (Holler 1877, Köckinger and Schröck 2017). In France, at the southwestern limit of its range, it has a very restricted distribution, being recorded only in the Jura and the Alps. The species has suffered a sharp reduction in its range in the French Jura, where it is now in danger of extinction (Magnin 1904, CBNFC ORI 2023). In the French Alps, it is confined to the Vanoise massif. Recent observations of healthy and densely populated high-alpine populations in France (Vanoise) or Switzerland (Bergamini et al. 2019) oppose with relict populations known in the lowlands of western and central Europe (Schröck 2013, Zechmeister et al. 2013, Bergamini et al. 2019).

Table 1.

IUNC status of D. turgescens of the European countries where it is or was found. ○ meaning LC or the absence of status.

img-z2-12_01.gif

The present study aims to determine the ecological requirements of D. turgescens in the French Alps and to better understand the ecology of the species in general to eventually suggest conservation measures. What is the habitat used by this species in its alpine zone? Are all alpine populations found in the same ecological context? If not, how do we explain such differences and what are their impacts on D. turgescens reproductive capacity and morphological plasticity?

Material and methods

Study sites

The fieldwork took place in the Vanoise massif in July 2018 and we focused on ten populations where the species was recently found, or that correspond to historical records of its occurrence (Fig. 1, Table 2).The Vanoise massif is characterized by large surfaces of limestone and a calc-schist geological substrate surrounded by crystalline rocks (Gensac 1990). All populations were found within the core park area of the Vanoise national park (codes: A1, A2, A3+4, B1+2, BP2, LR1, CV1, ML1, PN1) except for the Fournache location (code: F1).

Sampling design and data collection

To sample a population, a representative part of it was subjectively delineated, accounting for border effects, with a tape measure and poles (Fig. 2). Each population was sampled with a minimum of 30 contiguous quadrats of 70 × 70 cm (0.49 m2) for a total of 451 quadrats.

To describe vascular plant and bryophyte communities as well as their habitat, we determined visually the percentage of cover of every bryophyte and vascular plant species at the 0.49 m2 quadrat scale. Since we noticed a variation in the water table proximity at small scales, the percentage of cover for three micro-topographical elements (channels permanently water-filled; banks; elevated and drier mounds) was also determined visually. We then collected a handful of D. turgescens (if present) that was stored in a mailing envelope, dehydrated, and carried to the lab. Finally, soil depth from apices of living mosses to the bedrock was measured using a metallic rod.

To describe water chemistry at the population level, water samples were taken from among each of the ten studied populations. Precautions were taken not to collect the water after rain, to store it in a cooler with icepacks and deliver it to a nationally certified laboratory (accreditation COFRAC number 1-5822 (Comité Français d'Accréditation 2023)). The laboratory then analysed contents of total nitrogen (Ntot), phosphorus (P), bicarbonate (HCO3) and calcium (Ca) as well as the electric conductivity (Conduc), and the pH following standard protocols.

Figure 1.

Drepanocladus turgescens populations found in Vanoise national park before and after 2000 plus the studied populations and their code names. The green area is the park's most protected one: core area.

img-z3-1_01.jpg

To better understand bryophyte succession in our study area, peat core samples were extracted with the help of a Russian peat borer wherever possible in each population (there was a frequent absence of underlying substrate). The peat cores were cut into 10 cm long pieces then sifted through decreasing diameter meshes down to 800 µm. Bryophyte fragments were then identified to the specific level when possible and quantified (1: sparse; 2: moderate; 3: abundant) under the stereomicroscope.

In the laboratory, we determined the sexuality of our specimens as well as their branching along the stem, a characteristic that varied greatly between populations but not within the same population. From each D. turgescens sample coming from one quadrat, five stems were rehydrated to count for sexual structures (archegonia, antheridia, sporophytes) and the total number of stem branches with indices ranging from 0 to 4 (0: 0 branches; 1: < 5 branches; 2: 5 branches; 3: > 5–10 branches; 4: > 10 branches).

Table 2.

Code, localisation, altitude, mention's origin, and population density of the ten studied ones

img-z3-15_01.gif

Herbarium samples

We studied 130 herbarium sheets from Herbier National Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (PC), Conservatoire et Jardin Botanique de la Ville de Genève (G), Conservatoire Botanique National Alpin, Conservatoire Botanique National de Franche-Comté and the private herbaria of Vincent Hugonnot and Thierry Delahaye. Taxonomic identification and sexual structures were checked.

Statistical analysis

The data as well as figures were processed using R ver. 4.0.3 ( www.r-project.com). All georeferenced data was computed with QGIS 3.10.13 (QGIS Development Team 2022).

To represent how the percentage of cover of D. turgescens varied among the sampled quadrats, we produced a density curve using package ggplot2 ver. 3.4.0 (Wickham 2016).

Figure 2.

Example of the sampling design on one of the study sites.

img-z4-1_01.jpg

To describe the range of water chemistry within populations we produced boxplots using package ‘ggplot2’ ver. 3.4.0 (Wickham 2016).

Linear mixed-effects model analysis without interactions was performed to define the impact of the fixed variables channels, banks, mounds, and vascular plant covers as well as soil depth, sexuality, branching and water chemistry variables (Ntot, Ca, conductivity, HCO3, pH and P as chemically determined) on our response variable: the percentage of cover of D. turgescens (scaled from 0.05 to 1). The population ID was added as a random variable since we have a nested sampling design with numerous quadrats in our ten different populations. We removed rows without the presence of D. turgescens as it gave NA values for sexuality for example. The numeric explanatory variables were standardized using the function scale in R ( www.r-project.org). The model was built using the package ‘lme4’ (Bates et al. 2015). The effects of explanatory variables on the percentage of cover of D. turgescens were plotted using the package ‘sjPlot’ (Lüdecke 2018) with p-values over the 95% confidence interval.

A cluster analysis was made to represent the differences between plant assemblages in each studied population (n = 10). The cluster analysis was based on the grouping of bryophyte and vascular plant species data, on the understanding that these plant communities form an ecologically coherent whole. Plots were classified with the function pvclust in the ‘pvclust’ package using a distance based on correlation, a technique also known as ‘centered Pearson’ (Suzuki and Shimodaira 2006). Significant clusters are produced with p-values over a 95% confidence interval and 1000 bootstrap replications.

Results

Habitat

All populations of D. turgescens were at high altitudes (> 2000 m) in sites fed by fluxes of flush water. The water in the sites was mostly alkaline, but pH values were widely variable, ranging from 6.6 (F1) to 8.1 (CV1). Ca, HCO3, and accordingly, conductivity, also varied over a wide range of values. Ntot values were mostly low, at highest 24 mg l–1 (F1). P content varied from < 10 µg l–1 (A2, A3 + 4, B1 + 2) to 160 µg l–1 (PN1) (Fig. 3). Despite these large amplitudes of variation, the water chemistry had no significant influence on the cover of D. turgescens (Fig. 4).

Even if it was not significant, D. turgescens cover was higher on banks, while channels or mounds were associated with low cover of D. turgescens (Table 3, Fig. 4). At the quadrat scale, the cover of D. turgescens was either low or high (Fig. 5), with few intermediate percentages of cover (40–70%).

The soil of D. turgescens' growing sites was largely of mineral origin, with no or minimal accumulation of peat (Table 3), the peat being often less than 20 cm deep, taking into consideration that the living stems of D. turgescens can measure up to 10–15 cm long. Only on one occasion (A3 + 4) was the soil thicker. Soil depth to bedrock was negatively correlated with the species cover (Fig. 4).

Plant communities

A total of 34 vascular plant and 23 bryophyte species were recorded in association with D. turgescens (Table 3). The most frequently associated vascular plant species were Carex nigra, Trichophorum cespitosum, Equisetum variegatum and Eriophorum angustifolium, whereas the most frequent bryophyte species were Scorpidium cossonii, Campylium stellatum and Ptychostomum pseudotriquetrum. Additionally, D. turgescens was observed once at the base of a dripping limestone cliff at Vallon des Fours, Val-d'Isère, where it has been previously reported. The species covered less than 200 cm2 together with Hygrohypnum luridum and Amphidium lapponicum.

Two significantly different communities appeared among the ten studied populations. In one grouping was a cluster including stations CV1, LR1 and ML1, and in the other grouping, a cluster including all other populations except A3 + 4, which was not included in any cluster (Fig. 6). Notably, CV1, LR1 and ML1 were also the populations with a high cover of D. turgescens (> 67%), and low cover by vascular plants (< 24%), which are negatively correlated to the cover of D. turgescens (Fig. 4), and little or no peat (< 17 cm) which, as mentioned above, was also negatively correlated to cover by the species. In addition, CV1, LR1 and ML1 were also the only stations with individuals bearing archegonia in 2018.

Fertility

In 2018, archegonia were found in three of the studied populations (ML1, LR1 and CV1) and in Vallon des Fours. In 2017, female gametangia were also spotted in PN1 but not subsequently at the same place in 2018. Female gametangia were also observed in herbarium samples (12 out of 136 samples). Neither male gametangia nor sporophytes were found in any of the studied populations out of 1710 stems checked for sexual structures, nor were they found in herbarium samples except for one sporophyte in Pike Bay, lake Huron, Ontario, Canada. The presence of sexual structures in D. turgescens was positively correlated with its percentage of cover (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Boxplots showing the variations of the studied water chemistry variables in the ten studied populations.

img-z5-1_01.jpg

Macrorests

Only station A3+4, at Aussois, allowed macro plant remains to be studied. D. turgescens, and Scorpidium cossonii were recorded throughout the peat core; below 40 cm, no bryophyte fragments were detected. Calliergon richardsonii decreased from 40 to 20 cm and was replaced by Campylium stellatum, which is also found in present above-ground vegetation (Fig. 7).

Discussion

At the western margin of its Alpine range, D. turgescens has similar ecological requirements to those reported in previous studies (Bisang and Hedenäs 2017, Bergamini et al. 2019). Above 2000 m, it grows mainly in soligenous, mineral and peat-free fens fed by hard or less calcium-rich water. The other chemical elements showed similar variability. This is consistent with previously available data, where electrical conductivity vary from 145 to over 500 µS cm1 (Hedenäs 2002, Johnson and Steingraeber 2003), calcium from 15.4 mg l–1 to over 100 mg l–1 (Hedenäs 2002, Johnson and Steingraeber 2003) and pH from < 7 to > 8 (Schäfer-Verwimp 1985, Hedenäs 2002, Johnson and Steingraeber 2003, Krajewski 2017).

Figure 4.

Plot showing the estimates of the linear mixed effects model for each fixed variable where the response variable is the percentage of cover of Drepanocladus turgescens and the random variable is the site. Estimates are sorted in a decreasing order while the significance level at a 95% confidence interval is shown with the stars (*marginally significant, **significant, ***highly significant). Estimates represented in blue mean a positive influence of the variable on the percentage of cover of Drepanocladus turgescens while red mean a negative influence of the variable.

img-z5-9_01.jpg

We found D. turgescens in species-rich communities, which is also the case in Scandinavia (Hedenäs 2002). Apart from a few characteristic species frequently associated with each other (Equisetum variegatum, Trichophorum cespitosum, Scorpidium cossonii and Campylium stellatum), the floristic assemblages show significant variability in Vanoise and are not really comparable to those observed in Switzerland (Bisang and Hedenäs 2017), Italy (Buffa et al. 1998), Germany (Holler 1877, Schäfer-Verwimp 1985), Scandinavia (Hedenäs 2002) or Scotland (Birks and Dransfield 1970).

From our results, in high-altitude populations, two contrasting ecological conditions can be distinguished:

  1. high cover of bryophytes (> 50%), fertile (only female gametangia), unbranched D. turgescens, growing directly on mineral substrates, invading banks, with low vascular plant cover (< 25%) [PN1, ML1, CV1, LR1];

  2. low cover of bryophytes (< 30%), sterile (no gametangia), profusely branched D. turgescens, growing on shallow peat layers, with a significant vascular plant cover (> 40%), located mostly on banks [A1, A2, A3 + 4, B1, BP2, F1].

In Vanoise, D. turgescens appears to be confined to competition-free ecological microsites in banks, apparently being unable to invade channels that are permanently water-filled or drier mounds. This high sensitivity to competition (Schröck 2013) and its pioneering behaviour (Krajewski 2017) have been previously discussed and may explain its presence on bare, dry cliffs (Schröck 2013). To some extent, the presence of the species on bare, dry cliffs is reminiscent of that described in the alvars of southern Scandinavia and the Great Lakes region or in the limestone pavements of the UK (Hedenäs 2002, Porley 2013, Catling 2016) where the species grows massively directly on sparsely vegetated limestone outcrops. However, the alvar basins dry up completely in summer, in stark contrast to the meltwater from the glaciers that constantly percolates in Vanoise.

Table 3.

Table showing, for each studied station the presence or absence of sexual structures (archegonia only), the mean soil depth (cm), the percentage of cover of microtopographic elements, of each vascular plant and of each bryophyte species as well as the total percentage of cover of vascular plants and bryophytes

img-z6-2_01.gif

Table 3.

Continued.

img-AIWB_01.gif

Figure 5.

Density curve showing the percent of covers (scaled from 0 to 1) of D. turgescens found in all quadrat unit where it was detected.

img-z7-2_01.jpg

In addition to competition-free ecological conditions in banks, D. turgescens also occurs in sites with a peat layer and is apparently more constrained by competing vascular plants and bryophytes. Our single peat core indicates that an obviously wetter and sparsely vegetated environment (earlier dominance of Calliergon richardsonii) prevailed prior to the present ecological conditions. In this case, the more abundant branching system could be a consequence of competition. Hamatocaulis vernicosus, another Amblystegiaceae, has been shown to change its growth pattern when exposed to volatile organic compounds produced by Sphagnum flexuosum, a frequent competitor (Vicherová et al. 2020), and this may provide an analogue for this pattern of growth behaviour.

Hedenäs et al. (2021) observed that sexual expression was higher in late successional stages than in early successional stages in Scorpidium cossonii and Campylium stellatum. In contrast, for D. turgescens, gametangia production was recorded in pioneer ecological conditions only. Although gametangia formation is clearly dependent on a complex physico-chemical sequence of interacting parameters, this question certainly deserves to be explored.

Figure 6.

Grouping of the ten study populations according to the correlation between their vascular plant and bryophyte communities. The categorisation also takes into account the percentage cover of each species. The red boxes group communities that are statistically identical at the 95% confidence interval.

img-z7-7_01.jpg

Figure 7.

Synthesis of the sampled peatcore's bryophytes macrorests ranked from very abundant to not abundant every –10 cm under the surface.

img-z8-1_01.jpg

On the western margin of its alpine range, sexual reproduction of D. turgescens is constrained by the apparent total absence of male partners. Studies in Scandinavia found male buds and sporophytes in only ∼ 4% of 224 specimens studied (Bisang et al. 2014). The absence of males is a classic condition explaining the frequent sterility of dioecious bryophytes (Hedenäs et al. 2010, Bisang et al. 2014), among which are many wetland species, including D. turgescens (Hedenäs 2002, Porley 2013, Hedenäs et al. 2016, Campbell et al. 2019, Krajewski et al. 2020). However, even if we could not detect males, it is still possible that they are present as sterile colonies, so called “shy males”, not expressing their sexual parts (Stark et al. 2010). Then, sexual identification of non-sterile individuals by molecular methods (Hedenäs et al. 2016) would be desirable. Hedenäs and Bisang (2019) also showed that the production of archegonia and antheridia can vary interannually, suggesting that currently non-expressing individuals could potentially produce gametangia, but irregularly.

The only sporophytes of the moss in the Alps were found in the Austrian lowlands at altitudes of 165 and 300 m during the 19th century (Austrian Museum of Natural History, Hedenäs 2002, Hedenäs and Bisang 2019), once in a short-grass marshy meadow with a calcareous subsoil and once in a ditch. The occurrence of sexual reproduction events in the Alps can therefore not be completely excluded. Vegetative propagation by deciduous apical buds (Holler 1877, Limpricht 1904, Hedenäs 2002) could also contribute to the more local spread and maintenance of alpine haplotypes.

In the central European lowlands, D. turgescens is seriously threatened by unfavourable habitat change (Holler 1877, Schröck 2013, Zechmeister et al. 2013, Bergamini et al. 2019). Intensive agriculture and forestry have contributed to a lowering of the water table, leading to a natural proliferation of grasses, shrubs and trees (Schröck 2013, Zechmeister et al. 2013), which in turn can influence competitive relationships, to which D. turgescens is very sensitive. In addition, the afforestation of damp pastures and encroachment may be less favourable for successful establishment from spores (Sundberg and Rydin 2002, Miles and Longton 1990).

Widespread historical maintenance of hydrologically pristine bogs and fens by extensive mowing and grazing (especially trampling pressure) has contributed significantly to small-scale disturbance of the superficial peat substrate that can favour pioneer bryophyte species (Groeneveld et al. 2007, Ingerpuu and Sarv 2015, Guêné-Nanchen 2018) such as brown mosses (Udd et al. 2016). The presence of the species in anthropogenic ponds (Holler 1877, Schäfer-Verwimp 1985, Krajewski 2017), may be explained by the dynamic behaviour of the species in a newly formed competition-free environment.

Finally, from a practical point of view, we suggest that lowland or less healthy alpine populations alone should be subject to management, which should be low intensity, while alpine populations expressing sex should be preserved from disturbance. The main objective would be to reduce the cover of competitive plants. Low-pressure grazing or artificial stripping of the substrate could favour pioneer bryophytes (McBride and Scottish Natural Heritage 2011, Takala et al. 2014, Liebig 2016, Boch et al. 2018).

Acknowledgements –

We want to thank G and PC curators as well as Gilles Bailly (CBNFC) and Thomas Legland (CBNA) for sharing herbarium specimens. We want to thank Etienne Dambrine (University of Savoie Mont Blanc) for material support regarding our macrorest study. We want to thank Heribert Köckinger, Irene Bisang and Lars Hedenäs for their insights and thoughts about our ideas. We want to thank Simon Crowhurst for his English proof reading. Finally, we want to thank Risto Virtanen for his detailed and helpful reviews.

© 2023 The Authors.

This is an Open Access article

Author contributions

NA, VH and TD conceived and designed the experiments. NA performed the experiments and produced the data. NA analysed the data. NA wrote the initial manuscript. VH and TD edited and commented the manuscript..

Data availability statement

There are no additional data for this paper

References

1.

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. and Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. – J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1–48. Google Scholar

2.

Becker Scarpitta, A., Bardat, J., Lalanne, A. and Vellend, M. 2017. Long-term community change: bryophytes are more responsive than vascular plants to nitrogen deposition and warming. – J. Veg. Sci. 28: 1220–1229. Google Scholar

3.

Bergamini, A., Büschlen, A., Hepenstrick, D., Kiebacher, T., Meier, M., Schnyder, N. and Urmi, E. 2019. Beiträge zur bryofloristischen Erforschung der Schweiz – Folge 14. – Meylania 63: 5–14. Google Scholar

4.

Birks, H. J. B. and Dransfield, J. 1970. A note on the habitat of Scorpidium turgescens (T. Jens.) Loeske in Scotland. – Trans. Brit. Bryol. Soc. 6: 129–132. Google Scholar

5.

Bisang, I. and Hedenäs, L. 2005. Sex ratio patterns in dioicous bryophytes re-visited. – J. Bryol. 27: 207–219. Google Scholar

6.

Bisang, I. and Hedenäs, L. 2017. Drepanocladus turgescens (T. Jensen) Broth. doch im Engadin! – Meylania 59: 9–13. Google Scholar

7.

Bisang, I., Ehrlén, J. and Hedenäs, L. 2008. Are annual growth intervals independent units in the moss Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Amblystegiaceae). – Bryologist 111: 435–443. Google Scholar

8.

Bisang, I., Ehrlén, J., Persson, C. and Hedenäs, L. 2014. Family affiliation, sex ratio and sporophyte frequency in unisexual mosses: family, sex ratio, sporophyte frequency in mosses. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 174: 163–172. Google Scholar

9.

Boch, S., Müller, J., Prati, D. and Fischer, M. 2018. Low-intensity management promotes bryophyte diversity in grasslands. – Tuexenia 38: 19. Google Scholar

10.

Buffa, G., Miserere, L. and Vesco, G. D. 1998. Scorpidium turgescens and Splachnum sphaericum rediscovered in Italy. – J. Bryol. 20: 243–245. Google Scholar

11.

Campbell, C., Hodgetts, N. and Lockhart, N. 2019. The monitoring and assesment of Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Mitt.) Hedenäs (Slender Green feather-moss) in the Republic of Ireland 2015–2017. – Dept of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht: National Parks and Wildlife Serive. Google Scholar

12.

Catling, P. K. 2016. The classification of alvar vegetation in the interlake region of Manitoba, Canada. – Dept of Biological Sciences, Univ. of Manitoba. Google Scholar

13.

CBNFC-ORI 2023. Fiche Espèce – Espèces Végétales – Drepanocladus turgescens (T.Jensen) Broth., 1908. – Conservatoire Botanique National de Franche-Comté – Observatoire Régional des Invertébrés. Google Scholar

14.

Chapman, S., Buttler, A., Francez, A.-J., Laggoun-Défarge, F., Vasander, H., Schloter, M., Combe, J., Grosvernier, P., Harms, H., Epron, D., Gilbert, D. and Mitchell, E. 2003. Exploitation of northern peatlands and biodiversity maintenance: a conflict between economy and ecology. – Front. Ecol. Evol. 1: 525–532. Google Scholar

15.

Comité Français d'Accréditation 2023. COFRAC – Comité Français d'Accréditation. –  https://www.cofrac.fr/?type=30Google Scholar

16.

Davidson, N. C. 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. – Mar. Freshwater Res. 65: 934. Google Scholar

17.

Eller, F., Arias, C. A., Sorrell, B. K. and Brix, H. 2021. Preface: wetland ecosystems — functions and use in a changing climate. – Hydrobiologia 848: 3255–3258. Google Scholar

18.

Gensac, P. 1990. Plant and soil groups in the Alpine grasslands of the Vanoise Massif, French Alps. – Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 22: 195. Google Scholar

19.

Groeneveld, E. V. G., Massé, A. and Rochefort, L. 2007. Polytrichum strictum as a nurse-plant in peatland restoration. – Restor. Ecol. 15: 709–719. Google Scholar

20.

Guêné-Nanchen, M. 2018. Régénération des bryophytes dans les tourbières perturbées. – Université Laval. Google Scholar

21.

Hedenäs, L. 1993. Field and microscope keys to the Fennoscandian species of the Calliergon-Scorpidium-Drepanocladus complex, including some related or similar species. – Biodetektor. Google Scholar

22.

Hedenäs, L. 2002. Korvgulmossa pseudo-Calliergon turgescens, en spännande mossa i våra kalkrikaste trakter. – Sve. Bot. Tidskr. 96: 29–40. Google Scholar

23.

Hedenäs, L. 2003. Flora neotropica. Monograph 89: Amblystegiaceae (musci). – N. Y. Bot. Gard. Google Scholar

24.

Hedenäs, L. and Bisang, I. 2019. Episodic but ample sporophyte production in the moss Drepanocladus turgescens (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae) in SE Sweden. – Acta Mus Sil. Sci. Nat. 68: 83–93. Google Scholar

25.

Hedenäs, L., Oliván, G. and Eldenäs, P. 2005. Phylogeny of the Calliergonaceae (Bryophyta) based on molecular and morphological data. – Plant Syst. Evol. 252: 49–61. Google Scholar

26.

Hedenäs, L., Bisang, I., Korpelainen, H. and Cronholm, B. 2010. The true sex ratio in European Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae) revealed by a novel molecular approach. – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 100: 132–140. Google Scholar

27.

Hedenäs, L., Korpelainen, H. and Bisang, I. 2016. Identifying sex in non-fertile individuals of the moss Drepanocladus turgescens (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae) using a novel molecular approach. – J. Plant Res. 129: 1005–1010. Google Scholar

28.

Hedenäs, L., Hylander, K., Lönnell, N. and Bisang, I. 2021. Genetic variation and reproductive patterns in wetland mosses suggest efficient initial colonization of disturbed sites. – Ecol. Evol. 11: 15846–15859. Google Scholar

29.

Hodgetts, N. et al. 2019. A miniature world in decline: European Red List of Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts. – International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, International Union for Conservation of Nature Google Scholar

30.

Holler, A. 1877. Neue Beiträge zur Laubmoosflora Augsburgs und des Kreises Schwaben. – Vereins für Schwaben. Google Scholar

31.

Ignatova, E. A., Czernyadjeva, I. V., Fedorova, A. V. and Ignatov, M. S. 2021. A morphological and molecular phylogengetic study of the genus Calliergon (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia. – Arctoa 30: 8–24. Google Scholar

32.

Ingerpuu, N. and Sarv, M. 2015. Effect of grazing on plant diversity of coastal meadows in Estonia. – Ann. Bot. Fenn. 52: 84–92. Google Scholar

33.

Johnson, J. B. and Steingraeber, D. A. 2003. The vegetation and ecological gradients of calcareous mires in the South Park valley, Colorado. – Can. J. Bot. 81: 201–219. Google Scholar

34.

Karczmarz, K. 1971. A monograph of the genus Calliergon (Sull.) Kindb. – Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Google Scholar

35.

Köckinger, H. and Schröck, C. 2017. Rote Liste der Moose Kärntens. – Klagenfurt am Wörthersee: Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten. Google Scholar

36.

Krajewski, Ł. 2017. Drepanocladus turgescens (Bryophyta, Amblystegiaceae) rediscovered in Poland. – Cryptogam. Bryol. 38: 265–273. Google Scholar

37.

Krajewski, Ł., Adamec, L., Saługa, M., Bednarek-Ochyra, H. and Plášek, V. 2020. Welcome to the Czech Republic again! Rare northern mosses Calliergon megalophyllum and Drepanocladus sordidus (Amblystegiaceae) in South Bohemia in light of their European distribution and habitat preferences. – Phytokeys 154: 111–136. Google Scholar

38.

Kučera, J. and Hedenäs, L. 2020. Revisiting the genus Campyliadelphus (Amblystegiaceae, Bryophyta). – Nova Hedw. Beih. 150: 165–178. Google Scholar

39.

Kuhry, P. and Turunen, J. 2006. The postglacial development of boreal and subarctic peatlands. – In: Wieder, R. K. and Vitt, D. H. (eds), Boreal peatland ecosystems, vol. 188. Springer, pp. 25–46. Google Scholar

40.

Liebig, E. C. 2016. The impacts of sheep grazing on bryophyte communities in Iceland. – Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland. Google Scholar

41.

Limpricht, K. G. 1904. Die laubmoose Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz, vol. 3. – E. Kummer. Google Scholar

42.

Lüdecke, D. 2018. sjPlot – data visualization for statistics in social science. Google Scholar

43.

Magnin, A. 1904. Végétation des lacs du Jura. Considérations générales sur la flore des lacs du Jura et sur la végétation lacustre (deuxième partie). – Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon 29: 1–185. Google Scholar

44.

McBride, A. and Scottish Natural Heritage (eds) 2011. The fen management handbook. – SNH. Google Scholar

45.

Miles, C. J. and Longton, R. E. 1990. The role of spores in reproduction in mosses. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 104: 149–173. Google Scholar

46.

Moor, H., Rydin, H., Hylander, K., Nilsson, M. B., Lindborg, R. and Norberg, J. 2017. Towards a trait-based ecology of wetland vegetation. – J. Ecol. 105: 1623–1635. Google Scholar

47.

Moore, P. D. 1989. The ecology of peat-forming processes: a review. – Int. J. Coal Geol. 12: 89–103. Google Scholar

48.

Porley, R. 2013. England's rare mosses and liverworts: their history, ecology, and conservation. – Princeton Univ. Press. Google Scholar

49.

QGIS Development Team 2022. QGIS geographic information system. – Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Google Scholar

50.

Schäfer-Verwimp, A. 1985. Moosvegetation und Moosflora des Naturschutzgebietes Halbinsel Mettnau. – Herzogia 7: 279–294. Google Scholar

51.

Schröck, C. (ed.) 2013. Rote Liste gefährdeter Moose Vorarlbergs. – Vorarlberger Naturscha, Inatura. Google Scholar

52.

Stark, L. R., McLetchie, D. N. and Eppley, S. M. 2010. Sex ratios and the shy male hypothesis in the moss Bryum argenteum (Bryaceae). – Bryologist 113: 788–797. Google Scholar

53.

Sundberg, S. and Rydin, H. 2002. Habitat requirements for establishment of Sphagnum from spores. – J. Ecol. 90: 268–278. Google Scholar

54.

Suzuki, R. and Shimodaira, H. 2006. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. – Bioinformatics 22: 1540–1542. Google Scholar

55.

Takala, T., Tahvanainen, T. and Kouki, J. 2014. Grazing promotes bryophyte species richness in seminatural grasslands. – Ann. Bot. Fenn. 51: 148–160. Google Scholar

56.

Tveit, A. T., Kiss, A., Winkel, M., Horn, F., Hájek, T., Svenning, M. M., Wagner, D. and Liebner, S. 2020. Environmental patterns of brown moss- and Sphagnum-associated microbial communities. – Sci. Rep. 10: 22412. Google Scholar

57.

Udd, D., Sundberg, S. and Rydin, H. 2016. Multi-species competition experiments with peatland bryophytes. – J. Veg. Sci. 27: 165–175. Google Scholar

58.

Vicherová, E., Glinwood, R., Hájek, T., Šmilauer, P. and Ninkovic, V. 2020. Bryophytes can recognize their neighbours through volatile organic compounds. – Sci. Rep. 10: 7405. Google Scholar

59.

Vitt, D. H. and House, M. 2021. Bryophytes as key indicators of ecosystem function and structure of northern peatlands. – Bryophyte Divers. Evol. 43: 253–264. Google Scholar

60.

Wickham, H. 2016. Elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd edn. – Springer International Publishing, p. ggplot2. Google Scholar

61.

Zechmeister, H., Hagel, H., Gendo, A., Osvaldik, V., Patek, M., Prinz, M., Schröck, C. and Köckinger, H. 2013. Rote Liste der Moose Niederösterreichs. – Wiss. Mitt. Niederösterreichisches Landesmuseum 24: 7–126. Google Scholar
N. Ambec, T. Delahaye, and V. Hugonnot "Contrasting ecological and biological characteristics of high-altitude populations of Drepanocladus turgescens in the Vanoise national park," Lindbergia 2023(1), (24 October 2023). https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01172
Accepted: 11 July 2023; Published: 24 October 2023
KEYWORDS
Alps
Amblystegiaceae
arctic-alpine
bryophyte
conservation
Drepanocladus turgescens
France
Back to Top