Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
The Niterói and Talismã sites comprise two of the most important fossiliferous deposits of the Neogene in Brazil. After 30 years of research, these sites have revealed rich assemblages of vertebrates and provided a glimpse of the Amazonian fauna and environment during the Miocene. Despite this, detailed studies that attempt to explain the genesis of these bonebeds are still scarce and hamper more robust paleoenvironmental and paleoecological reconstructions. Here we provide the first in-depth taphonomic analysis for both locations. Sedimentological and taphonomic evidence suggest that the depositional environments of Niterói and Talismã were similarly represented by shallow and calm waters in lacustrine/swampy contexts. We propose that the accumulation of bones and teeth is the result of attritional (day-to-day) mortality of organisms of the local community in a low sedimentation environment. The thanatocoenosis was exposed to biostratinomic processes for longer periods of time, which explains the high disarticulation, disassociation, fragmentation and loss of skeletal elements. The almost absence of weathering indicates that the aquatic environment slowed down the organic degradation of bioclasts, while the rarity of abrasion shows a limited influence of hydraulic flows in transporting and remobilizing bioclasts. Thus, both sites preserve mostly autochthonous to parautochthonous bioclasts, with a moderate level of time-averaging. Our results corroborate the hypothesis that lentic environments can present remarkable preservational conditions for the formation of attritional accumulations of vertebrate remains. Moreover, we show how the different collecting methods affect the description of preservational features and taphonomic interpretations of both fossil assemblages.
This article is only available to subscribers. It is not available for individual sale.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have
purchased or subscribe to this BioOne eBook Collection. You are receiving
this notice because your organization may not have this eBook access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users-please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
Additional information about institution subscriptions can be foundhere