Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2006 Benthic foraminiferal assemblages in Osaka Bay, southwestern Japan: faunal changes over the last 50 years
AKIRA TSUJIMOTO, RITSUO NOMURA, MORIAKI YASUHARA, SHUSAKU YOSHIKAWA
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Live benthic foraminiferal assemblages from surface sediment in Osaka Bay collected in 1999 were analyzed to characterize the distribution of the modern foraminiferal assemblages. Foraminiferal assemblages were compared with those of previous studies to document environmental changes in Osaka Bay over the past 50 years.

Sixty-one species of foraminifera belonging to 37 genera were recognized from the 1999 surface sediment samples. An agglutinated assemblage containing Trochammina hadai and Eggerella advena is dominant in the inner part of the bay and is related to eutrophication. The foraminiferal assemblage in areas deeper than about 20 m is composed of Eggerella advena, Ammonia beccarii forma A, and Pseudorotalia gaimardii. This assemblage may be influenced by the large clockwise Okinose Circulation Current which extends throughout the western bay.

Foraminiferal assemblages in Osaka Bay have changed dramatically during the last 50 years. The Trochammina hadai-Eggerella advena assemblage became established in the inner part of the bay, reflecting eutrophication that progressed from the 1960s through the 1970s. This assemblage became dominant in 1983, and typically dominated the inner part of the bay. From 1983 to 1999, however, the abundance of taxa belonging to this assemblage decreased greatly following implementation of 1973 Osaka City bylaws that restricted wastewater discharge. Changes in benthic assemblages such as the decrease of Ammonia beccarii forma A and increase of Eggerella advena have occurred in response to decreased incidence of red tides, and floral change in the species that cause these tides. The results of this study demonstrate that the abundance and distribution of benthic foraminifers in Osaka Bay are intimately related to environmental changes related to the urbanization of coastal areas.

Introduction

Coastal areas have suffered environmental damage from pollution associated with industrialization and urbanization over the past few centuries, and foraminiferal assemblages in coastal areas have changed in response. Many studies have been carried out in various areas using foraminifera as bioindicators of marine pollution from sewage, heavy metals, oil, and aquaculture, as summarized by Yanko et al. 1994, 1999 and Alve (1995a). The main purpose of these studies was to clarify the relationship between foraminiferal distributions or morphological abnormalities of foraminiferal tests and the various sources of pollution (e.g., Geslin et al., 1998, 2002; Yanko et al., 1998; Angel et al., 2000; Coccioni, 2000; Samir, 2000; Debenay et al., 2001; Samir and El-Din, 2001). Other studies have addressed historical changes of foraminiferal assemblages from the viewpoint of anthropogenic pollution (e.g., Alve, 1991; Thomas et al., 2000; McGann et al., 2003). Elimination of foraminiferal assemblages with increased input of organic materials and chemical pollutants has also been reported from an estuary in Spain (Cearreta et al., 2000).

Pollution has become severe in bays close to large cities such as Tokyo and Osaka due to increasing population, industrialization, and urbanization since the Meiji Restoration of 1867. In Osaka Bay, increased marine pollution has mirrored population increase from around A.D. 1900 onward (Nakatsuji et al., 1998). Pollution peaked during the 1960s to 1970s, when several large-scale land reclamation, industrialization and urbanization projects were undertaken in the coastal zone (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996). As an example, the occurrence of red tides increased rapidly (Joh, 1986). In addition, anoxia or hypoxia of the bottom layer developed in the inner part of Osaka Bay (Joh, 1986). Benthic ecosystems have been strongly influenced by this bottom water hypoxia (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996). After about 1970, a national conservation effort placed restrictions on the discharge of substances capable of increasing Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). However, no actual improvement in water quality (e.g., phosphorus, nitrogen) was reported during the following decade (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996).

Three studies have addressed the spatial distribution of benthic foraminifera in Osaka Bay (Takayanagi, 1953; Nakaseko, 1953; Konda and Chiji, 1987), using bottom sediment samples collected in 1933, 1952, and 1983, respectively. Takayanagi (1953) only dealt with the southern part of Osaka Bay. The other two reports have greater coverage. Together, they provide useful documentation of the changes in the foraminiferal assemblages in Osaka Bay over the past 50 years.

Environmental setting

Osaka Bay is located at the eastern end of the Seto Inland Sea. The bay is elliptical, with a longer axis of about 60 km and a shorter axis of about 30 km (Figure 1). The bay is about 1500 km2 in area, and is about 20 m in mean depth. The 20 m isobathymetric line runs approximately north to south in its central part. The seabed at depths shallower than 20 m is relatively flat in comparison with the seabed at depths greater than 20 m. Sediments at depths greater than 20 m consist of sand or gravel, whereas muddy sediment occurs at depths shallower than 20 m. Osaka Bay is almost enclosed, and is connected to Harimanada Bay and the Kii Channel through the Akashi and Tomogashima Straits, respectively. Two currents occur within Osaka Bay: the Okinose Circulation and East Coast Residual Currents. The Okinose Circulation Current is a large clockwise current in central Osaka Bay. The East Coast Residual Current flows along the bay's eastern margin (Figure 1). The properties of both the water and bottom sediment are influenced by these tidal currents (Fujiwara, 1995).

Figure 1.

Maps showing location (A) and bathymetry (B) of Osaka Bay, including foraminiferal samples used in this study, and the direction of residual currents (solid line, surface current; dashed line, bottom current). Bathymetric data in meters from Japan Coast Guard (1978, 1995, 1997). Residual currents from Fujiwara et al. 1989: a, Suma Counter Current; b, Off Nishinomiya Circulation Current; c, East Coast Residual Current; d, Okinose Circulation Current; e, Tomogashima Counter Current.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f01.gif

COD, phosphorus, and nitrogen concentrations are high in the inner part of the bay throughout the year (Figure 2). Productivity of phytoplankton is high in the inner part of the bay, and red tides occur frequently (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996). These facts result from drainage from households and factories flowing in through the Yodo River, the Yamato River, and other rivers, in addition to stagnant sea water from the inner part to the eastern part of Osaka Bay (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996). During summer the surface water is saturated in dissolved oxygen due to phytoplanktonic photosynthesis. Stratification occurs in summer, and no oxygen is supplied to the bottom layer from the surface water. In addition, oxygen is consumed by decomposition of descending organic matter. Consequently, the bottom layer reaches a state of anoxia or hypoxia (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996; Figure 2). Conversely, COD, phosphorous concentration, and nitrogen concentration are comparatively low in the western part of the bay because there are few corrupting inflows in that area, and seawater is actively exchanged (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Distribution of dissolved oxygen mg/l in the bottom water (average of observations from 1995 to 1999), and distributions of COD and total phosphorous concentrations mg/l in the surface water (average of 1999). Data from Osaka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station (1997 to 2001).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f02.gif

Samples and methods

Twenty-seven samples (st. 1–8, 10–12, 14, 16–30) were collected by the Marine Ecological Institute Co. on May 26–29 1999, using Ekman-Birge and Smith-McIntyre grab samplers (Figure 1; Hongo and Nakajo, 2003). The basic parameters of sampling sites are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Only the uppermost centimeter of the sediment was used in this study. In the laboratory, samples were washed through a 63 μm sieve. The residues were stained with Rose Bengal solution for 12 h to distinguish live individuals from dead individuals (Walton, 1952). Foraminiferal assemblages were analyzed in the > 105 μm fraction and samples containing abundant foraminiferal tests were split for counts of about 200 specimens. We largely followed the taxonomy of Loeblich and Tappan (1988) for the determination of foraminifera. We also examined both live and dead foraminiferal assemblages to establish the difference between them. Although all previous studies in Osaka Bay except that of Konda and Chiji (1987) were based on the total assemblage, we regard the live specimens as representing the modern assemblage. Murray (2000) and Debenay et al. 2001 suggested that the total assemblage may be affected by various taphonomic processes (e.g., transport, dissolution of calcareous tests) and represent the average of previous live assemblages over several years. Consequently, Murray (2000) suggested that ecological studies should be based on the live assemblage. The sedimentation rate in Osaka Bay is quite high, and differs within a range of 0.2–0.8 g/cm2/year (Hoshika et al., 1994). If we utilize the total assemblage for comparison with previous studies, the total assemblage may lead to inaccurate information about the present environment. However, Debenay et al. 2001 also suggested that a sampling bias might be introduced by using seasonal live assemblages due to the foraminiferal life cycle. Therefore, we evaluated differences between live and dead assemblages.

Figure 3.

Median diameter (φ scale) of bottom sediment in Osaka Bay. Data from Hongo and Nakajo (2003).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f03.gif

Figure 4.

Salinity and dissolved oxygen at sampling sites (May, 1999). Data for salinity from Hongo and Nakajo (2003). Data for dissolved oxygen from Yasuhara and Irizuki (2001).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f04.gif

The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (Shannon and Weaver, 1949) was used to evaluate the assemblages. This index incorporates the number of individuals as well as the number of taxa. We calculated diversity using samples containing more than 50 individuals to obtain the foraminiferal diversity distribution. The Shannon-Wiener index is given as:

i1342-8144-10-2-141-eq01.gif

where H = index of species diversity; S = number of species observed in a sample; and Pi = proportion of each species.

A Q-mode cluster analysis was also performed using PAST ver. 0.95 ( http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/) to recognize sample affinities according to species composition. This is a data analysis package intended for paleontology, and includes common statistical, plotting and modeling functions (Hammer et al., 2001). Species with three or more individuals in any samples and samples with 50 or more individuals were used in the Q-mode cluster analysis. Similarities used were Horn's overlap indices (Horn, 1966). The UPGMA (unweighted pair-group average) clustering method was used to connect respective clusters. In the UP-GMA clustering method, clusters are joined based on the average distance among all members in the two groups (Hammer et al., 2001).

Results

Abundance and diversity

Sixty-one species belonging to 37 genera were identified from 27 samples. No live planktonic foraminifera were recognized in this study. Table 1 lists the foraminifera examined in this study. SEM images of the main foraminiferal species are given in Figures 5 and 6.

Table 1.

List of living foraminifera from Osaka Bay

i1342-8144-10-2-141-t101.gif

Table 1.

Continued

i1342-8144-10-2-141-t102.gif

Figure 5.

Scanning electron micrographs of the foraminifera from Osaka Bay (scale bars = 100 μm). 1a–1c. Ammonia beccarii (Linné) forma A. 2a, 2b. Buccella frigida (Cushman). 3. Buliminella elegantissima (d'Orbigny). 4. Brizalina striatula (Cushman). 5. Eggerella advena (Cushman). 6a, 6b. Elphidium advenum (Cushman). 7. Elphidium clavatum Cushman. 8. Elphidium reticulosum Cushman. 9a, 9b. Elphidium somaense Takayanagi. 10a, 10b. Elphidium subarcticum Cushman. 11. Fissurina annectens (Burrows and Holland). 12a, 12b. Gavelinopsis praegeri (Heron-Allen and Earland). 13a, 13b. Pseudononion japonicum Asano.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f05.gif

Figure 6.

Scanning electron micrographs of the foraminifera from Osaka Bay (scale bars = 100 μm). 1a, 1b. Pseudoparella tamana Kuwano. 2a, 2b. Pseudorotalia gaimardii (d'Orbigny). 3. Reophax catella (Höglund). 4a, 4b. Rotaliammina chitinosa (Cushman). 5. Textularia cf. andenensis Asano. 6. Textularia earlandi Parker. 7a–7c, 8a–8c. Trochammina hadai Uchio. 9. Uvigerinella glabra (Millett).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f06.gif

Maps of the total number of foraminifera per gram of dry sediment and the distribution of foraminiferal diversity show abundances were greatest at station 17′ (147 individuals per gram) in the central part of the bay (Figure 7). Lower numbers were found at sites such as station 8 (three individuals per gram) and 24′ (six individuals per gram). Generally, lower numbers were found in the inner part of the bay. A small number of live foraminifers were found in the middle of the bay, where the influence of the bottom current is strong.

Figure 7.

Distribution of foraminiferal abundance and diversity in Osaka Bay.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f07.gif

The Shannon-Wiener index indicates that lowest diversity occurs in the inner part of the bay, near the mouth of the Yodo River (Figure 7). Two to six species were found in this area, indicating a diversity index of < 1. In contrast, samples with high diversity occurred in the middle of the bay, with highest diversity (2.22) at station 20. The coastal region in the southern part of the bay near Kansai International Airport also shows high diversity.

Foraminiferal assemblages

Quantitative distribution of the main foraminiferal species per 10 grams of dry sediment (Figure 8) shows Ammonia beccarii (Linné) forma A is abundant in the area along the shore, and accounts for 100 or more individuals at sites such as stations 6, 11, 14, 22, and 23. Abundances were greatest at station 23, with 278 individuals. Numbers present generally decrease slightly toward the middle of the bay. Buccella frigida (Cushman) mainly occurs in water depths between 15 and 20 m, whereas Eggerella advena (Cushman) is abundant throughout the bay. Samples from many sites contained more than 100 individuals; and more than 1000 individuals were found at stations 11 and 17. Trochammina hadai Uchio is found throughout Osaka Bay but is most abundant in the inner part of Osaka Bay; a maximum of 241 individuals of this species was recorded at station 2.

Figure 8.

Distribution and abundance of main and characteristic species in Osaka Bay (number of individuals/10 g dry sediment).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f08.gif

Twenty-six samples and twenty-two species were selected for Q-mode cluster analysis based on the above-mentioned rules. A Q-mode cluster analysis grouped the 26 samples into three principal biotopes (A, B, C) (Figures 9, 10C). Biotope A occurred at stations 5 and 23, both of which are situated in the coastal section of the bay (Figure 10C). This biotope is characterized by the dominance of A. beccarii forma A (average 56.5%), with minor B. frigida (9%) and E. advena (6%), Elphidium subarcticum Cushman (9%), and T. hadai (6%) (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Dendrogram of Q-mode cluster analysis and relative frequency of characteristic species.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f09.gif

Figure 10.

Time series of foraminiferal distributions in Osaka Bay. A. Data for surface samples collected in 1952 (after Nakaseko, 1953). B. Data for surface samples collected in 1983 (after Konda and Chiji, 1987). C. Data for surface samples collected in 1999 (this study).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f10.gif

Biotope B comprises 20 samples (stations 6, 7, 10–12, 14, 16–22, 24–30). Two subbiotopes (B1 and B2) can be distinguished by the composition of the species. Subbiotope B1 consists of 12 samples (stations 6, 7, 10–12, 14, 21, 22, 27–30) from water depths of 9.2 to 19.7 m (Figure 10C), and is characterized by the dominance of E. advena (44.8%) and A. beccarii forma A (26.5%) (Figure 9). Subbiotope B2 comprises 8 samples (stations 16–20, 24–26) from depths of 17.2–37.2 m (Figure 10C). This subbiotope is characterized by the dominance of E. advena (61.1%), with minor Pseudorotalia gaimardii (d'Orbigny), Pseudononion japonicum Asano and Pseudoparella tamana Kuwano (Figure 9).

Biotope C comprises 4 samples (stations 1–4) collected from the mouth of the Yodo River in the inner part of the bay (Figure 10C). This biotope is characterized by the dominance of E. advena (47.7%) and T. hadai (49.8%) (Figure 9).

Discussion

Relationship between foraminiferal assemblages and marine environments in Osaka Bay

The main species of biotopes A–C are common in coastal areas and bays around Japan and around the world (Nomura, 1982, 1983, 1997; Alve, 1995a). The genus Ammonia mainly occurs in shallow marine or slightly brackish intertidal environments (Hayward et al., 2004). This genus has high morphologic variability (e.g., beccarii, parkinsoniana, tepida), and also has great molecular variability (Holzmann et al., 1998; Hayward et al., 2004). A. beccarii forma A is a morphologic type of Ammonia beccarii in Japan, and is ubiquitous in brackish lakes influenced by fresh water and in the areas around river mouths (e.g., Takayanagi, 1955; Matoba, 1970; Ikeya, 1970; Inoue, 1986; Kosugi et al., 1991; Nomura and Seto, 2002). Both B. frigida and E. advena are common in the waters around the islands of Japan and in inland seas (e.g., Ishiwada, 1964; Matoba, 1970; Kato, 1986; Oki, 1989; Kosugi et al., 1991), whereas T. hadai is abundant in organic-rich sediments deposited in brackish waters (Uchio, 1962; Matoba, 1970; Kosugi et al., 1991; Nomura and Seto, 1992, 2002).

Biotope B is divided into two subbiotopes, B1 and B2, and its boundary is recognized at a water depth of about 20 m. Faunal change at 20 m water depth in Osaka Bay has also been recognized in ostracodes (Yasuhara and Irizuki, 2001), and other benthic faunal changes also occur at this water depth (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996). Within Osaka Bay, the properties of waters (e.g., dissolved oxygen content, salinity of surface waters, and COD) are divided into a western part and an eastern part by the large clockwise Okinose Circulation Current on the boundary of the 20 m isobathymetric line (Fujiwara, 1995; Figure 2). The western waters are mixed from the surface layer to the bottom layer strongly and homogeneously (Fujiwara, 1995). There is a tidal front around 20–30 m water depth, and the suspended organic matter and the sinking organic matter are different from across the tidal frontal area (Montani et al., 1991). In the tidal frontal area, the relative abundance of terrestrial organic matter is low (Mishima et al., 1999). A small amount of fresh organic matter sinks in the eastern part of the tidal front, whereas a large quantity of decomposed labile fraction sinks in the tidal frontal area and western part of the tidal front (Montani et al., 1991). Benthic foraminifers respond to hydrographic variations, dissolved oxygen content in bottom waters and variations in food supply (Alve, 1995b, 1999; Gustafsson and Nordberg, 1999, 2000; Ward et al., 2003). Thus, the faunal change of biotope B may be primarily influenced by the changes of properties of water masses and sinking organic matter controlled by the Okinose Circulation Current.

Agglutinated species such as E. advena and T. hadai are dominant species in biotope C, which is also characterized by the lowest diversity among all the biotopes (0.62–0.72). Agglutinated foraminifers have the potential to assess polluted environments (Nagy and Alve, 1987; Alve, 1991, 1995a), as increased organic pollution leads to development of an agglutinated assemblage (Alve, 1991, 1995a). Conversely, foraminiferal assemblages distributed close to sewage outfalls are characterized by high number of specimens and low diversity (Alve, 1995b; Thomas et al., 2000). Based on these features, the agglutinated E. advenaT. hadai assemblage distributed in the inner part of Osaka Bay may be related to eutrophication of coastal waters in that area. T. hadai is abundant in many Japanese and American brackish waters, together with A. beccarii (Matoba, 1970; Matsushita and Kitazato, 1990; McGann and Sloan, 1997). Uchio (1962) suggested that the increase in organic matter carried by rivers influences T. hadai abundances more than water temperature and the salinity of the bottom waters. Konda and Chiji (1987, 1989) pointed out the relationship between increased relative frequency of T. hadai and bottom water hypoxia in polluted bays. E. advena is another taxon that is common in waste discharge regions (Watkins, 1961; Clark, 1971; Schafer and Cole, 1974; Bates and Spencer, 1979; Alve and Nagy, 1986; McGann et al., 2003). The salinity of the bottom layer was almost the same at each sampling site in our present study (Figure 4), and therefore the presence of T. hadai and E. advena is intimately related to the environmental parameters of organic matter load and dissolved oxygen content in the habitat. In the inner part of Osaka Bay, COD and phosphorus concentrations are high throughout the year, and the bottom layer usually becomes anoxic or hypoxic in summer (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996; Figure 2). Yasuhara and Irizuki (2001) suggested that modern ostracodes are rare in surface sediments in inner Osaka Bay, and attributed this low abundance to bottom water hypoxia. Tsujino and Tamai (1996) suggested that the distribution of meiobenthos is strongly affected by the eutrophic water and the hypoxic water in the inner part of Osaka Bay. Thus, Biotope C is formed by the eutrophic waters and the bottom water hypoxia. T. hadai and E. advena can therefore be used as an index of eutrophication in Osaka Bay.

As noted above, foraminiferal assemblages classified by Q-mode cluster analysis suggest that both natural variability and human activity are significant factors in determining change in the character of modern sediments in Osaka Bay. However, human-induced change is more significant in causing eutrophication in the inner part of the bay. Recent foraminiferal assemblages of Osaka Bay have changed distinctly by the influence of this human-induced eutrophication as follows.

Changes of benthic foraminiferal assemblage and implications for environmental changes in Osaka Bay from the 1950s to the 1990s

In addition to the live assemblages, we examined the difference between live and dead assemblages to demonstrate that the live assemblages are not represented by temporal variations (Figure 11). Biotope A is mainly composed of A. beccarii. Little difference is seen between the proportions of the dead and live assemblages at station 23, whereas there are minor differences between the proportions of live and dead specimens of A. beccarii and T. hadai at station 5. Biotope B1 is mainly composed of A. beccarii, E. advena and T. hadai. For A. beccarii little difference is seen between the proportions of the dead and live assemblages, whereas for E. advena the proportion of living specimens is higher. The reverse is seen for T. hadai, with a high proportion of dead specimens. High proportions of dead T. hadai are found on the inner side of the bay in biotope B1 (stations 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14). Therefore, these dead T. hadai may be transported from biotope C. Biotope C is mainly composed of E. advena and T. hadai. Little difference is seen between the proportions of the dead and live specimens at stations 1 and 2, whereas there are minor differences between the proportions of live and dead specimens of E. advena and T. hadai at stations 3 and 4. However, in this study, we do not discuss the proportions of E. advena and T. hadai in the T. hadaiE. advena assemblage. As mentioned above, there are some stations that have differences between the proportions of the dead and live assemblages, but no critical differences in main species composition could be found between them in biotopes A, B1, and C. However, biotope B2 contains various dead species and is characterized by diversified thanatocoenoses. The sediment of this biotope contains sand grains which have been transported from shallower to deeper parts of Osaka Bay by the active influence of the Okinose Circulation Current (Fujiwara, 1995). The dead assemblage of this biotope is characterized by Gavelinopsis praegeri (Heron-Allen and Earland), Pseudorotalia gaimardii, Cibicides spp., and Cancris auriculus (Fichtel and Moll). These species favor coarse-grained sediments with low concentrations of organic carbon or fresh organic matter (Konda and Chiji, 1987; Altenbach et al., 2003), and are found in the mouth of Osaka Bay abundantly (Konda and Chiji, 1987). On the other hand, E. advena, which is both the live and dead dominant species in biotope B2, favors high organic content. Many species of the dead assemblage have different habitats from E. advena, and therefore it is assessed that the dead assemblage contains various allochthonous specimens. Although the live assemblage of biotope B2 differs from the dead assemblage, no critical difference in main species composition could be found between them. Therefore, the occurrence of the live assemblages confirms the environmental conditions of the present Osaka Bay.

Figure 11.

Comparison of relative frequency of dead and living specimens of the most abundant species.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f11.gif

Recent studies of benthic foraminifera in Osaka Bay were undertaken by Takayanagi (1953), Nakaseko (1953) and Konda and Chiji (1987). Takayanagi (1953) studied 11 samples collected from the middle to the mouth of the bay in 1933, and reported that the main species included Bolivina robusta Brady, E. advena, and Textularia spp. His study is not used for comparison here, however, because the two study areas do not overlap.

Nakaseko (1953) analyzed 40 samples collected from the entire bay in 1952, and Konda and Chiji (1987) analyzed 28 samples in 1983. Nakaseko (1953) analyzed the > 73 μm fraction, and there is no mention of the analyzed size fraction in Konda and Chiji (1987). Nakaseko (1953) recognized four foraminiferal assemblages, the Rotalia beccarii (= Ammonia beccarii) assemblage, Rotalia papillosa (= Pseudorotalia gaimardii) assemblage, Textularia assemblage, and Elphidium crispum assemblage. Among them, the Textularia assemblage and Elphidium crispum assemblage are not discussed, because the distribution areas of these assemblages do not overlap with areas of this study. The Ammonia beccarii assemblage contained A. beccarii (> 30%) as well as B. frigida, Elphidium advenum (Cushman), and Nonion pacificum (Cushman), and occurred in the eastern part of the bay. The Pseudorotalia gaimardii assemblage, which contained P. gaimardii (> 30%) along with A. beccarii and E. advenum, was distributed in the western part, as shown in Figure 10A.

Konda and Chiji (1987) studied both live and dead faunas. They recognized eight total assemblages at that time. In this study, we judged that their Eggerella scabra was within the range of variation of Eggerella advena based on close examination of their photographs of this species. We identified Trochammina hadai (Figure 6–8) with Trochammina cf. japonica of Konda and Chiji (1987). Matsushita and Kitazato (1990) suggested that microspheric agamont generations of Trochammina hadai disperse under the influence of summer hypoxic bottom water, whereas megalospheric generations disoerse in water of high dissolved oxygen content. Consequently, we determined that our Trochammina (Figure 6–8) and Trochammina cf. japonica of Konda and Chiji (1987) fall within the range of variation of Trochammina hadai (microspheric generation of Matsushita and Kitazato (1990)). The change in these species names does not affect the following discussion, because we recognize the same specimens as Konda and Chiji (1987) based on close examination of their photographs. The E. advenaT. hadai assemblage is dominated by E. advena (> 51%) with subordinate T. hadai (24–46%). The T. hadai assemblage is mostly dominated by T. hadai (> 58%) with lesser E. advena (5–39%). These two assemblages were widely distributed in the inner and southeastern parts of the bay. The A. beccarii forma A–E. advena assemblage, in which A. beccarii forma A accounts for > 25% of the assemblage which also includes E. advena and T. hadai, is widely distributed in the middle part of the bay (Figure 10B). As mentioned above, analyzed size fractions differ between Nakaseko (1953) (> 73 μm), Konda and Chiji (1987) (no description about the analyzed size fraction), and this study (> 105 μm). However, we judged that different size fractions do not affect the comparison of main foraminiferal composition described as follows.

The foraminiferal assemblages recognized in this study clearly suggest that the main foraminiferal composition changed distinctly during the 50-year interval from the 1950s through the 1990s (Figure 10). An understanding of the environmental changes in Osaka Bay that are attributable to human activity can be developed by examining the main species, as follows. Although A. beccarii was the dominant species in the inner part of the bay in 1952, the agglutinated species E. advena and T. hadai had overtaken this region in 1983. These species remained abundant in 1999 (Figures 10, 12). This distinct change dose not occur due to differences of analyzed size fractions.

Figure 12.

Comparison of relative frequency of the most abundant species. Sample numbers (ns, ks, st) correspond to the sampling site numbers in Figure 10. Data of surface samples collected in 1952, 1983, 1999 from Nakaseko (1953), Konda and Chiji (1987), this study, respectively.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f12.gif

The volume of organic material and nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen discharged into Osaka Bay increased with the rapid economic growth which occurred from the middle 1950s to the middle 1970s, and pollution of Osaka Bay's waters progressed simultaneously (Figure 13). Consequently, from the latter half of the 1960s, outbreaks of red tide occurred in spring and summer (Joh, 1986). In addition, anoxia or hypoxia of bottom water commonly occurred in the inner part of Osaka Bay (Joh, 1986).

Figure 13.

Secular change of inflow loads from the Osaka Bay region. Data for nitrogen, phosphorus, and COD from Nakatsuji et al. 1998.

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f13.gif

Our surface study suggested that two dominant species, E. advena and T. hadai, are good indicators of eutrophication in Osaka Bay. Increased organic pollution accelerates the dominance of agglutinated assemblages (Alve, 1991, 1995a). Murray (1991) described E. advena as a detritivore, and Thomas et al. 2000 suggests that the change in abundance of E. advena is related to change in the composition of the food supply. Thus, the remarkable change from the A. beccarii assemblage to an agglutinated assemblage (E. advenaT. hadai assemblage) between 1952 and 1999 was caused by eutrophication of the bottom water, and change in the food supply due to red tides. The latter have frequently occurred in the inner part of the bay since the 1960s (Joh, 1986). In comparison with Konda and Chiji's (1987) report, however, the area characterized by the T. hadaiE. advena assemblage had decreased by 1999 (Figure 10). Governmental restriction of nutrient discharge from around 1980 has led to some improvement in water quality in terms of COD (Figure 13; Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996). Therefore, the reduced distribution of the T. hadaiE. advena assemblage may indicate alleviation of eutrophy due to the restrictions imposed on the discharge of wastewater.

P. gaimardii was the dominant species in the middle part of the bay in 1952. However, the relative abundance of this species subsequently decreased, accounting for 10% or less in 1983. Abundance of this species decreased further (several percent or less) in 1999. P. gaimardii is a large-sized species (Figure 6-2). Therefore, this change in abundance of P. gaimardii cannot be due to differences of analyzed size fractions. The decline of this species is intimately related to the progressive eutrophication of the bay waters, which became too severe for P. gaimardii to live. Consequently, P. gaimardii decreased continuously from the 1950s onward.

A. beccarii forma A decreased, whereas E. advena increased throughout Osaka Bay in comparison with the distribution reported by Konda and Chiji (1987) (Figure 12). E. advena was not reported from any sites in the 1950s (Nakaseko, 1953), and it thus is clear that a distinct increase of E. advena has occurred over the past 50 years. According to the Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay (1996), no conspicuous change in water quality has occurred in Osaka Bay in the last decade. Thus, the increase of this species is a matter for discussion with respect to environmental change.

McGann et al. 2003 reported reciprocal occurrence of two species over the past 40 years in Santa Monica Bay in relation to sewage discharge and remediation. Trochammina pacifica prefers organic wastes, and decreased in abundance after initiation of sewage treatment programs, whereas E. advena increased in abundance. As a consequence, however, the different response of the two species suggests substantial degradation in the sediment quality, and the competitive advantage of E. advena. The same ecological response is suggested by two species in Osaka Bay. Occurrence of T. hadai decreased, and E. advena increased in abundance after wastewater discharge restrictions were imposed in 1973. However, even after regulation, red tides still occur frequently in the innermost part of Osaka Bay (Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay, 1996; see Figure 14). Moreover, the main species of the red tide-causing organisms changed after the environmental regulations were instituted (Figure 15). The number of red tides caused by Skeletonema costatum decreased after 1975. Although dinoflagellates (e.g., Ceratium furca, Gymnodium lacustre, Olisthodiscus sp. and Peridinium sp.) caused red tides frequently during the 1970s, this type of red tide decreased after the 1980s. Red tides caused by diatoms (e.g., Chaetoceros spp., Nitzschia pungens, and Rhizosolenia fragilissima) and Heterosigma akashiwo (zooxanthella) then increased. It is well known that food supply substantially influences benthic foraminifer populations (Alve, 1995b, 1999; Gustafsson and Nordberg, 1999, 2000; Thomas et al., 2000; Ward et al., 2003; Topping et al., 2006). Red tides cause the accumulation of a large amount of detritus at the bottom of the sea, which then becomes food for detritivores. The changes of composition of red tide-causing organisms cause changes in the organic supply to the bottom of the sea. Consequently, changes in the food supply may have triggered the changes in the benthic foraminiferal assemblages from the 1980s onward. Although the number of red tides has decreased gradually under the impact of environmental regulations, and the makeup of the red tide-causing organisms has changed, sediment quality has not been remediated to the degree that the foraminiferal assemblage has rebounded to the assemblage present in the early 1950s. Further study is necessary to fully understand the relationship between changes in the benthic foraminiferal assemblages and changes in the food supply.

Figure 14.

Temporal change in the occurrences of red tides. Data from Osaka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station (1973 to 2001).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f14.gif

Figure 15.

Temporal changes in the number of occurrences of red tide-causing organisms. Data from Osaka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station (1973 to 2001).

i1342-8144-10-2-141-f15.gif

Conclusions

Sixty-one species of foraminifera belonging to 37 genera were found in Osaka Bay. Foraminiferal diversity is lower toward the inner part of the bay due to water pollution. Three assemblages are identified by Q-mode cluster analysis. Among these, the E. advena and the A. beccarii forma A–E. advena assemblages are strongly influenced by natural environmental factors related to the residual current. The T. hadaiE. advena assemblage is strongly influenced by bottom water anoxia or hypoxia. These assemblages are thus important when considering the influence of human activity which can induce such conditions.

Foraminiferal assemblages in Osaka Bay have changed greatly in the past 50 years. Eutrophication accelerated in the 1970s, and the T. hadaiE. advena assemblage occupied extensive areas of the inner bay. The areal extent of the T. hadaiE. advena assemblage decreased greatly between 1983 and 1999. However, E. advena has increased throughout Osaka Bay over the past 50 years. The number of occurrences of red tides has decreased gradually following improved environmental regulations instituted in 1973, and the composition of the red tide-causing organisms has also changed. These changes may have caused the substantial changes in the foraminiferal assemblages. However, sediment quality has not been remediated sufficiently to permit the foraminiferal assemblages to recover to those seen in the early 1950s, prior to the phase of rapid economic development and the pollution that ensued. Further study is necessary to fully understand the relationship between changes in the benthic foraminiferal assemblages and changes in the food supply.

Acknowledgments

Our thanks go to Hisao Kumai and Muneki Mitamura (Osaka City University) for their helpful advice, to Takamoto Okudaira (Osaka City University) for use of a scanning electron microscope (JSM-5500; JEOL), and to Akira Yao of for use of the gold evaporation system in his Osaka City University laboratory.

We thank Jean-Pierre Debenay (Universite' d'Angers), Mary McGann (U.S. Geological Survey), Ellen Thomas (Wesleyan University), and Ivo Duijnstee (Utrecht University) for their critical readings of an early draft. Barry P. Roser (Shimane University) much improved the manuscript by his careful reading. We are also thankful to Shiro Hasegawa (Kumamoto University) and Stephen Culver (East Carolina University) for their constructive reviews and for improving the manuscript.

The samples used in this study were collected with Misao Hongo, Hidekazu Michihana, and Tadayuki Nakamori, also of Osaka City University. We are indebted to the Marine Ecological Institute Co. for extraction of the Osaka Bay surface sediment samples.

References

1.

A. V. Altenbach, G. F. Lutze, R. Schiebel, and J. Schönfeld . 2003. Impact of interrelated and interdependent ecological controls on benthic foraminifera: An example from the Gulf of Guinea. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology vol. 197:p. 213–238. Google Scholar

2.

E. Alve 1991. Benthic foraminifera in sediment cores reflecting heavy metal pollution in Sørfjord, western Norway. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 21:p. 1–19. Google Scholar

3.

E. Alve 1995a. Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: A review. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 25:p. 190–203. Google Scholar

4.

E. Alve 1995b. Benthic foraminiferal distribution and recolonization of formerly anoxic environments in Drammensfjord, southern Norway. Marine Micropaleontology vol. 25:p. 169–186. Google Scholar

5.

E. Alve 1999. Colonization of new habitats by benthic foraminifera: A review. Earth-Science Reviews vol. 46:p. 167–185. Google Scholar

6.

E. Alve and J. Nagy . 1986. Estuarine foraminiferal distribution in Sandebukta, a branch of the Oslo Fjord. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 16:p. 261–284. Google Scholar

7.

D. L. Angel, S. Verghese, J. J. Lee, A. M. Saleh, D. Zuber, D. Lindell, and A. Symons . 2000. Impact of a net cage fish farm on the distribution of benthic foraminifera in the northern gulf of Eilat (Aqaba, Red Sea). Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 30:p. 54–65. Google Scholar

8.

Association for New Social Infrastructure of Osaka Bay . ed. 1996. Communication Tool for Sustainable Development. 268. p. Institute of Coastal Environment Inc. Osaka. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

9.

J. M. Bates and R. S. Spencer . 1979. Modification of foraminiferal trends by the Chesapeake-Elisabeth sewage outfall, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 9:p. 125–140. Google Scholar

10.

A. Cearreta, M. J. Irabien, E. Leorri, I. Yusta, I. W. Croudace, and A. B. Cundy . 2000. Recent anthropogenic impacts on the Bilbao Estuary, northern Spain: Geochemical and microfaunal evidence. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science vol. 50:p. 571–592. Google Scholar

11.

D. F. Clark 1971. Effects of aquaculture outfall on benthonic foraminifera in Clam Bay, Nova Scotia. Maritime Sediments vol. 7:p. 76–84. Google Scholar

12.

R. Coccioni 2000. Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution. In R. E. Martin , editor. ed. Environmental Micropaleontology: The Application of Microfossils to Environmental Geology. p. 71–103.Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. New York. Google Scholar

13.

J. P. Debenay, E. Tsakiridis, R. Soulard, and H. Grossel . 2001. Factors determining the distribution of foraminiferal assemblages in Port Joinville Harbor (Ile d'Yeu, France): The influence of pollution. Marine Micropaleontology vol. 43:p. 75–118. Google Scholar

14.

T. Fujiwara 1995. Structure of the flow which governs the ecosystem of Osaka Bay. Scientific Forum of the Seto Inland Sea vol. 2–3:p. 85–93. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

15.

T. Fujiwara, T. Higo, and Y. Takasugi . 1989. Residual current, tidal current and eddy. Proceedings of Coastal Engineering vol. 36:p. 209–213. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

16.

E. Geslin, J. P. Debenay, and M. Lesourd . 1998. Abnormal wall textures and test deformation in Ammonia beccarii (hyaline foraminifer). Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 28:p. 148–156. Google Scholar

17.

E. Geslin, J. P. Debenay, W. Duleba, and C. Bonetti . 2002. Morphological abnormalities of foraminiferal tests in Brazilian environments: comparison between polluted and non-polluted areas. Marine Micropaleontology vol. 45:p. 151–168. Google Scholar

18.

M. Gustafsson and K. Nordberg . 1999. Benthic foraminifera and their response to hydrography, periodic hypoxic conditions and primary production in the Koljo fjord on the Swedish west coast. Journal of Sea Research vol. 41:p. 163–178. Google Scholar

19.

M. Gustafsson and K. Nordberg . 2000. Living (stained) benthic foraminifera and their response to the seasonal hydrographic cycle, periodic hypoxia and to primary production in Havstens fjord on the Swedish west coast. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science vol. 51:p. 743–761. Google Scholar

20.

Ø Hammer, D. A T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan . 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4 9. p. ( http://palaeoelectronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm). Google Scholar

21.

B. W. Hayward, M. Holzmann, H. R. Grenfell, J. Pawlowski, and C. M. Triggs . 2004. Morphological distinction of molecular types in Ammonia towards a taxonomic revision of the world's most commonly misidentified foraminifera. Marine Micropaleontology vol. 50:p. 237–272. Google Scholar

22.

M. Holzmann, W. Piller, L. Zaninetti, R. Fenner, R. Martini, R. Serandrei-Barbero, and J. Pawlowski . 1998. Molecular versus morphologic variability in Ammonia spp. (Foraminifera, Protozoa) from the Lagoon of Venice, Italy. Revue de Micropaléontologie vol. 41:p. 59–69. Google Scholar

23.

M. Hongo and T. Nakajo . 2003. Fine-grained sediments dispersion in the eastern part of Osaka Bay, based on distribution of remains of Pediastrum biwae (fresh water green alga) from the Yodo River. Journal of the Sedimentological Society of Japan no. 56p. 17–26. Google Scholar

24.

H. S. Horn 1966. Measure of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. American Naturalist vol. 100:p. 419–424. Google Scholar

25.

A. Hoshika, T. Tanimoto, and Y. Mishima . 1994. Sedimentation processes of particulate matter in the Osaka Bay. Umi no Kenkyu (Oceanography in Japan) vol. 3:no. 6p. 419–425. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

26.

N. Ikeya 1970. Population ecology of benthic foraminifera in Ishikari Bay, Hokkaido, Japan. Records of Oceanographic Works in Japan, New series vol. 10:p. 173–191. Google Scholar

27.

Y. Inoue 1986. Foraminiferal assemblages from the surface deposits of Suruga Bay. Kaiyo Monthly no. 18p. 564–569. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

28.

Y. Ishiwada 1964. Benthonic foraminifera off the Pacific coast of Japan referred to biostratigraphy of the Kazusa Group. Report, Geological Survey of Japan no. 205p. 1–45. Google Scholar

29.

Japan Coast Guard . 1978. Tomogashima Suido 1:50,000 Basic Maps for the Sea in Coastal Waters no. 6383-4. Google Scholar

30.

Japan Coast Guard . 1995. Eastern Part of Osaka Wan 1:50,000 Basic Maps for the Sea in Coastal Waters no. 6383-1. Google Scholar

31.

Japan Coast Guard . 1997. Akashi Kaikyo 1:50,000 Basic Maps for the Sea in Coastal Waters no. 6383-3. Google Scholar

32.

H. Joh 1986. Studies on the mechanism of eutrophication and the effect of it on fisheries production in Osaka Bay. Bulletin of the Osaka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station vol. 7:p. 1–174. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

33.

M. Kato 1986. Recent shallow water foraminifera in Hiroshima Bay, Seto Inland Sea, Japan. In Y. Matoba and M. Kato , editors. eds. Studies on Cenozoic Benthic Foraminifera in Japan p. 27–42. Akita University. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

34.

I. Konda and M. Chiji . 1987. Change of foraminiferal thanatocoenoses of the Osaka Bay during the last fifty years. Bulletin of Kansai Organization for Nature Conservation no. 14p. 11–22. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

35.

I. Konda and M. Chiji . 1989. Change of foraminiferal thanatocoenoses in Tanabe Bay, Kii Peninsula, during the last thirty years. In Y. Takayanagi and K. Ishizaki , editors. eds. Collected papers on foraminifera from the Japanese Islands. p. 105–110. Toko Press. Sendai. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

36.

M. Kosugi, H. Kataoka, and S. Hasegawa . 1991. Classification of foraminifer communities as indicators of environments in an inner bay and its application to reconstruction of paleoenvironments. Fossils (Palaeontological Society of Japan) vol. 50:p. 37–55. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

37.

A. R. Loeblich Jr. and H. Tappan . 1988. Foraminiferal genera and their classification. 2:vols. 970. p. 847 plates. Van Nostrand and Reinhold Company. New York. Google Scholar

38.

Y. Matoba 1970. Distribution of recent shallow water foraminifera of Matsushima Bay, Miyagi Prefecture, Northeast Japan. Tohoku University, Science Reports, 2nd Series (Geology) vol. 42:p. 1–85. Google Scholar

39.

S. Matsushita and H. Kitazato . 1990. Seasonality in the benthic foraminiferal community and the life history of Trochammina hadai Uchio in Hamana Lake, Japan. In C. Hemleben, M. A. Kaminski, W. Kuhnt, and D. Scott , editors. eds. Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera. p. 695–715.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. Google Scholar

40.

M. McGann, C. R. Alexander, and S. M. Bay . 2003. Response of benthic foraminifers to sewage discharge and remediation in Santa Monica Bay, California. Marine Environmental Research vol. 56:p. 299–342. Google Scholar

41.

M. McGann and D. Sloan . 1999. Benthic foraminifers in the regional monitoring program's San Francisco estuary samples. San Francisco Estuary Regional Monitoring Program for trace substances, 1997 Annual Report p. 249–258. Google Scholar

42.

Y. Mishima, A. Hoshika, and T. Tanimoto . 1999. Deposition rates of terrestrial and marine organic carbon in the Osaka Bay, Seto Inland Sea, Japan, determined using carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in the sediment. Journal of Oceanography vol. 55:p. 1–11. Google Scholar

43.

S. Montani, Y. Mishima, and T. Okaichi . 1991. Scavenging processes of marine particles in Osaka Bay. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 23:p. 107–111. Google Scholar

44.

J. W. Murray 1991. Ecology and paleoecology of benthic foraminifera. 451. p. Longman Scientific and Technical Publishers. Essex. Google Scholar

45.

J. W. Murray 2000. The enigma of the continued use of total assemblages in ecological studies of benthic foraminifera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 30:p. 244–245. Google Scholar

46.

J. Nagy and E. Alve . 1987. Temporal changes in foraminiferal faunas and impact of pollution in Sandebukta, Oslo fjord. Marine Micropaleontology vol. 12:p. 109–128. Google Scholar

47.

K. Nakaseko 1953. Foraminiferal thanatocoenoses of Osaka Bay (part 1). Science Report South College, North College, Osaka University vol. 2:p. 101–105. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

48.

K. Nakatsuji, T. Teraguchi, and N. Yamane . 1998. Time change of water qualities in Osaka Bay during past 70 years and numerical experiments. Proceedings of Coastal Engineering vol. 45:p. 1011–1015. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

49.

R. Nomura 1982. List and bibliography of the recent benthonic foraminifera. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Shimane University (Natural Science) vol. 15:p. 31–69. Google Scholar

50.

R. Nomura 1983. List and bibliography of the recent benthonic foraminifera. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Shimane University (Natural Science) vol. 16:p. 21–54. Google Scholar

51.

R. Nomura 1997. List of the recent benthic foraminifera. Memories of the Faculty of Education, Shimane University (Natural Science) vol. 31:p. 1–25. Google Scholar

52.

R. Nomura and K. Seto . 1992. Benthic foraminifera from brackish Lake Nakaumi, Sanin District, southwestern Honshu, Japan. In K. Ishizaki and T. Saito , editors. eds. Centenary of Japanese Micropaleontology. p. 227–240.Terra Scientific Publishing Company. Tokyo. Google Scholar

53.

R. Nomura and K. Seto . 2002. Influence of man-made construction on environmental conditions in brackish Lake Nakaumi, southwest Japan: foraminiferal evidence. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 108:p. 394–409. Google Scholar

54.

K. Oki 1989. Ecological analysis of benthonic foraminifera in Kagoshima Bay, south Kyushu, Japan. South Pacific Study vol. 10:p. 1–191. Google Scholar

55.

Osaka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station 1973–2001. Business Report of Osaka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station, 1972–1999. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

56.

A. M. Samir 2000. The response of benthic foraminifera and ostracods to various pollution sources: A study from two lagoons in Egypt. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 30:p. 83–98. Google Scholar

57.

A. M. Samir and A. B. El-Din . 2001. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages and morphological abnormalities as pollution proxies in two Egyptian bays. Marine Micropaleontology vol. 41:p. 193–227. Google Scholar

58.

C. T. Schafer and F. E. Cole . 1974. Distribution of benthic foraminifera: Their use in delimiting local nearshore environments. Offshore Geology of Canada, Eastern Canada, Geological Survey of Canada vol. 1:p. 103–108..  Google Scholar

59.

C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver . 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. 117. p. University of Illinois Press. Urbana. Google Scholar

60.

Y. Takayanagi 1953. Distribution of the recent foraminifera from adjacent seas of Japan. Records of oceanographic works in Japan, New Series vol. 1:p. 78–85. Google Scholar

61.

Y. Takayanagi 1955. Recent foraminifera from Matsukawaura and its vicinity. Contributions from the Institute of Geology and Paleontology Tohoku University no. 45p. 18–52. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

62.

E. Thomas, T. Gapotchenko, J. C. Varekamp, E. L. Mecray, and M. R. Buchholz ten Brink . 2000. Benthic foraminifera and environmental changes in Long Island Sound. Journal of Coastal Research vol. 16:p. 641–655. Google Scholar

63.

J. N. Topping, J. W. Murray, and D. W. Pond . 2006. Sewage effects on the food sources and diet of benthic foraminifera living in oxic sediment: A microcosm experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology vol. 329:p. 239–250. Google Scholar

64.

M. Tsujino and K. Tamai . 1996. Sediment conditions and meiobenthic community in Osaka Bay, Japan. Bulletin of the Nansei Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory no. 29p. 87–100. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

65.

T. Uchio 1962. Influence of the River Shinano on foraminifera and sediment grain size distribution. Seto Marine Biological Laboratory Publications vol. 10:p. 363–393. Google Scholar

66.

W. R. Walton 1952. Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research vol. 3:p. 56–60. Google Scholar

67.

N. J. Ward, W. P. David, and J. W. Murray . 2003. Feeding of benthic foraminifera on diatoms and sewage-derived organic matter: an experimental application of lipid bio-marker techniques. Marine Environmental Research vol. 56:p. 515–530. Google Scholar

68.

J. G. Watkins 1961. Foraminiferal ecology around the Orange County, California, ocean sewer outfall. Micropaleontology vol. 7:p. 199–206. Google Scholar

69.

V. Yanko, M. Ahmad, and M. Kaminski . 1998. Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to pollution by heavy metals: implications for pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 28:p. 177–200. Google Scholar

70.

V. Yanko, A. J. Arnold, and W. C. Parker . 1999. Effect of marine pollution on benthic foraminifera. In B. K. Sen Gupta , editor. ed. Modern Foraminifera. p. 201–216.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. Google Scholar

71.

V. Yanko, J. Kronfield, and A. Flexer . 1994. Response of benthic foraminifera to various pollution sources: implications for pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 24:p. 1–17. Google Scholar

72.

M. Yasuhara and T. Irizuki . 2001. Recent Ostracoda from the northeastern part of Osaka Bay, southwestern Japan. Journal of Geoscience, Osaka City University vol. 44:p. 57–95. Google Scholar
AKIRA TSUJIMOTO, RITSUO NOMURA, MORIAKI YASUHARA, and SHUSAKU YOSHIKAWA "Benthic foraminiferal assemblages in Osaka Bay, southwestern Japan: faunal changes over the last 50 years," Paleontological Research 10(2), 141-161, (1 June 2006). https://doi.org/10.2517/prpsj.10.141
Received: 10 August 2005; Accepted: 1 February 2006; Published: 1 June 2006
KEYWORDS
Benthic foraminifera
Eutrophication
Japan
Osaka Bay
pollution
Back to Top