Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2021 Late Kungurian Conodonts of Pelagic Panthalassa from Seamount-Capping Limestone in Ogama, Kuzuu, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan
Shun Muto, Yohoko Okumura, Takeshi Mizuhara
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Biostratigraphy of conodonts is widely used for age assignment of Permian strata. In this paper, we report conodonts from the limestone of the Nabeyama Formation deposited on a pelagic seamount in Panthalassa, which is an oceanic realm where Permian conodont data are scarce compared to other oceanic realms. Samples collected from the lower part of the Nabeyama Formation yielded Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller) and Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang), which indicate a late Kungurian age. Previous studies and fusulinids obtained in this study indicate that the studied samples belong to the Parafusulina yabei biozone. Therefore, the Parafusulina yabei Zone includes the uppermost Kungurian. Mesogondolella idahoensis and Sweetognathus hanzhongensis are respectively regarded as cool and warm water species. Hence, the distribution of cool and warm water conodont species may have overlapped in pelagic Panthalassa during the late Kungurian.

Introduction

The study of Permian conodonts began in western North America as early as the 1930s (Branson, 1932). In the following decades, the Great Basin region was the centre of Permian conodont research (Youngquist et al., 1951; Clark and Ethington, 1970; Wardlaw and Collinson, 1979). Studies in the Great Basin led to the establishment of the rough framework of conodont biozones for the Permian (Clark and Behnken, 1970; Clark et al., 1979). The pioneer work in western North America was followed by studies in Europe (Bender and Stoppel, 1965), southern Urals (Chernykh and Reshetkova, 1987), South China (Ching, 1960; Wang, 1978; Wang and Wang, 1981), the Arctic region (Bender and Stoppel, 1965; Szaniawski and Malkowski, 1979; Sobolev and Nakrem, 1996), Iran (Teichert et al., 1973), Japan (Igo and Koike, 1966; Igo, 1981) and elsewhere. Based on the global-scale data of conodont biostratigraphy, correlation of regional biozones was attempted, resulting in the proposal of biozones that are traceable across the globe (Kozur, 1995). At present, conodonts are recognized as one of the most useful taxa for biostratigraphic division of the Permian System, so much so that all the stage and substage boundaries of the Permian ratified to date are based on conodonts (Henderson et al., 2012; Henderson, 2016).

While the accumulation of knowledge on Permian conodonts has led to refinements in taxonomy and improvements in the resolution of biozones in the well-studied regions, some regions have been left behind from the progress. One such region is Japan, where Permian strata occur most typically as allochthonous rocks within accretionary complexes (e.g. Isozaki et al., 1990, 2010). Such strata potentially provide precious biostratigraphic and biogeographic records of pelagic Panthalassa that occupied a large part of the surface of the Earth (Figure 1.1).

In Japan, Permian conodonts have been reported from seamount-capping limestones (Hayashi, 1971; Sobajima, 1972; Makino, 1976; Ishida, 1977, 1985; Matsuda, 1980; Igo, 1981, 1989; Igo and Hisada, 1986; Shen et al., 2012) and deep-sea bedded chert (Toyohara, 1976, 1977; Ishida, 1977, 1979, 1985; Kitao, 1996; Nishikane et al., 2011) within the Jurassic accretionary complexes. In particular, the seamount-capping limestones yield abundant specimens of conodonts, on which a biostratigraphic framework for the Permian was built (Igo, 1981). However, the taxonomy of Permian conodonts has undergone significant revision since this framework was constructed. For example, platform conodonts previously assigned to the genus Gondolella (as in Clark and Mosher, 1966), were split into Mesogondolella, Jinogondolella and Clarkina (Kozur, 1989; Mei and Wardlaw, 1994). Unfortunately, only a limited number of specimens were illustrated by previous studies on Permian conodonts in Japan. Therefore, it is important that new conodont specimens are obtained and described from Panthalassic seamount-capping carbonates.

Figure 1.

1, Palaeogeographic map of the early Permian (Laya et al., 2013) and the depositional site of pelagic Panthalassic sediments in Japan. 2, Distribution of the Jurassic accretionary complex of Japan, modified after Isozaki et al. (2010).

img-z2-1_105.jpg

Investigation of conodont biostratigraphy in pelagic seamount-capping limestone deposited in central Panthalassa can also aid the establishment of an integrated conodont-fusulinid biostratigraphy. Fusulinid biostratigraphy has traditionally been used for biostratigraphic division of Panthalassic seamount-capping limestones of Japan (e.g. Toriyama, 1967). However, fusulinid biozones are not readily correlated with the international standard Geological Time Scale (Leven, 2003). Recently, correlation of fusulinid biozones with conodont and radiolarian biozones and magnetic polarity reversals was established for the Permian in South China (Shen et al., 2018). Igo (1981) presented parallel biozonation of conodonts and fusulinids in the Panthalassic seamount-capping limestone in Japan, but the conodont biostratigraphic framework needs to be refined, as mentioned earlier.

This study reports conodonts obtained from the Panthalassic seamount-capping limestone of the Nabeyama Formation in Ogama, Sano City, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. The Nabeyama Formation in the Kuzuu area has been a target of many biostratigraphic and tectonostratigraphic studies (see also Geological setting). The age of the Nabeyama Formation was previously studied based on conodonts and fusulinids. Fujimoto (1961) dated the Nabeyama Formation as middle Permian based on fusulinids. Hayashi (1971) reported the occurrence of Carboniferous conodonts from this formation, but Hisayoshi Igo (1972) and Hisaharu Igo (1981) insisted that the “Carboniferous” species in Hayashi (1971) were Permian species. Subsequently, Igo (1981) assigned the Nabeyama Formation to the middle Permian based on conodonts, and Kobayashi (2006) also implied a middle Permian age based on fusulinids. Herein, we reassess the age of the Nabeyama Formation based on our new conodont specimens. The biogeographic significance of the conodonts is also discussed.

Geological setting

The samples treated in this study are limestone samples obtained in a valley east of Ogama in the northern part of Sano City, Tochigi Prefecture, Kanto District, Japan (36°29′18″N 139°33′54″E). This limestone belongs to the Nabeyama Formation (defined by Yoshida, 1956), which is a part of the Kuzuu Complex (Kuzu Complex sensu Kamata, 1996, 1997) of the Tamba–Mino–Ashio Belt (also known as the Mino–Tamba–Ashio Belt). The Tamba–Mino–Ashio Belt is mostly composed of Jurassic accretionary complexes (Yamakita and Otoh, 2000; Isozaki et al., 2010; Kojima et al., 2016) (Figure 1.2). The Jurassic accretionary complexes of the Tamba–Mino–Ashio Belt mainly comprise Carboniferous to Middle Jurassic oceanic rocks (ocean floor basalt, deep-sea chert, hemipelagic siliceous mudstone, seamount basalt and seamount-capping carbonate), and Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous trench-fill terrigenous clastic rocks (mudstone and sandstone). The Carboniferous to Middle Jurassic oceanic rocks were deposited in pelagic Panthalassa several thousand kilometres from the nearest continent (Figure 1.1), after which they traveled to a subduction zone along the palaeo-continent and formed a part of the accretionary complexes by the tectonic movement of the oceanic plates (Matsuda and Isozaki, 1991; Wakita and Metcalfe, 2005; Isozaki et al., 2010).

Figure 2.

Geologic maps showing the geology of the Kuzuu area (Kamata, 1997). 1, Surface distribution of the Tamba–Mino–Ashio Belt; 2, Geologic map of the Ashio Mountains; 3, Geologic map of the Kuzuu area and the location of the areas studied by Kobayashi (1979, 2006). OG: Ogama; TJ: Takajikko; NA: Nagaami; KS: Karasawa; YS: Yamasuge. Two sections (A and B) in Karasawa and Yamasuge are individually logged sections in these areas in Kobayashi (1979, 2006) (See also Figure 3).

img-z3-1_105.jpg

The Kuzuu Complex is the southernmost part of the Tamba–Mino–Ashio Belt in the Kanto District of east Japan (Figure 2). Our samples belong to the limestone of the Nabeyama Formation (Yoshida, 1956; Fujimoto, 1961). The Nabeyama Formation conformably overlies the Izuru Formation that is composed mainly of basaltic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks (Yoshida, 1956; Fujimoto, 1961; Kamata, 1996). The Nabeyama and Izuru formations together form a thrust sheet (Yanagimoto, 1973), which is named as tectonostratigraphic “Unit 2” of the Kuzuu Complex (Kamata, 1996, 1997). The Izuru and Nabeyama formations are considered to be derived from a seamount in pelagic Panthalassa (Kamata, 1996).

The limestone of the Nabeyama Formation is divided into three parts: the lower, middle and upper parts (Yoshida, 1956; Fujimoto, 1961; Kobayashi, 1979). Fujimoto (1961) and Yanagimoto (1973) classified these three parts as members of the Nabeyama Formation, but Kobayashi (1979) noted that this stratigraphic division is not valid, because the dolomitization that defines the middle part is secondary, and is also recognizable in the lower and upper parts. We will follow Kobayashi (1979) and refrain from using the members defined by Fujimoto (1961) and Yanagimoto (1973). The lower part of the Nabeyama Formation is mainly composed of black, dark grey or grey well-bedded limestone that is frequently dolomitized and includes chert nodules (Figure 3; Fujimoto, 1961; Kobayashi, 1979). The middle part is dominated by light grey, grey or dark grey massive dolostone (Figure 3; Fujimoto, 1961; Kobayashi, 1979). The upper part is mainly composed of light grey, grey, dark grey or black massive limestone that is frequently dolomitized and includes chert nodules (Figure 3; Fujimoto, 1961; Kobayashi, 1979).

Figure 3.

Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the Izuru and Nabeyama Formations. Lithostratigraphy is after Kobayashi (1979). Fusilinid biostratigraphy is after Kobayashi (2006) and conodont biostratigraphy is after Igo (1981). See caption for Figure 2 for abbreviation of the names of study areas. (A) and (B) in KS are sections A–A′ and B–B′ in Kobayashi (1979, 2006), respectively. (A) and (B) in YS are A–A′ and B–B′–B″ in Kobayashi (1979, 2006), respectively.

img-z4-1_105.jpg

Figure 4.

Map showing the outcrops confirmed in this study (discrete outcrops in the northern part), the location of the studied sections, the location of the sampling point of the float samples (2014-188, 2014-215), and the geological map by Kobayashi (1979, 2006).

img-z5-1_105.jpg

The Izuru Formation has been dated as middle Permian by fusulinids (Kobayashi, 2006). The Nabeyama Formation has been dated as middle Permian by conodonts (Koike et al., 1974; Igo, 1981), fusulinids (Fujimoto, 1961; Igo, 1964; Kobayashi, 1979, 2006) and brachiopods (Tazawa et al., 2016). Fusulinids are the most thoroughly studied index fossils in the Izuru and Nabeyama formations, and three biozones of the middle Permian have been established: the Parafusulina nakamigawai, Parafusulina yabei and Parafusulina tochigiensis zones in ascending order (Kobayashi, 2006). The Nabeyama Formation is overlain unconformably by a limestone conglomerate that yields conodonts of middle Permian to late Triassic age (Conodont Research Group, 1972, 1974; Yanagimoto, 1973; Koike et al., 1974) and middle to late Permian fusulinids (Figure 3; Igo and Igo, 1977; Kobayashi, 1979). This conglomerate is thought to be correlative with cave deposits that occur within the Nabeyama Formation (Kobayashi, 1979).

In Ogama, the lower to middle part of the Nabeyama Formation is exposed (OG in Figure 3; Kobayashi, 1979). Here, the Parafusulina yabei and Parafusulina tochigiensis fusulinid biozones have been recognized (Figure 3; Kobayahsi, 2006). The locality we studied is exactly the same as that studied by Tazawa et al. (2016) (note that the locality is mislocated in their paper), and is apparently a lateral extension of the strata within the Parafusulina yabei Zone of Kobayashi (2006) (Figures 3 and 4). This is further supported by the finding of Parafusulina yabei Hanzawa from this locality by Tazawa et al. (2016).

Methods

We conducted a field survey at the Ogama locality and collected limestone samples for extraction of conodonts. We also observed the lithology of the limestone for comparison with the lithostratigraphic section drawn by Kobayashi (1979). The collected limestone samples were treated by 4.8 wt% formic acid. Conodonts were picked from the residue and photographed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM: Keyence-VF8800) and an optical stereoscopic microscope at the University of Tokyo. For observation of fusulinids, we made thin sections of the limestone and observed them under a microscope through transmitted light.

Results

In the studied locality in Ogama, outcrops of limestone occur structurally above outcrops of sandstone (Figure 4). The distribution of these two lithofacies is consistent with the geological map by Kobayashi (1979, 2006) (Figure 4). Two lithostratigraphic sections were observed in the limestone outcrops: Section 1 and Section 2 in structurally ascending order (Figure 4). The top of Section 1 corresponds approximately with the base of Section 2 according to the orientation of the bedding plane. Both sections are composed of well-bedded or weakly bedded dark grey fossiliferous limestone (Figures 5 and 6.1). Black chert nodules are present in the middle to upper part of Section 1 and the upper part of Section 2.

We obtained two limestone samples from the middle part of Section 2 (2013-12 and 2014-236; Figure 5). We also obtained two samples of limestone float at the base of Section 2 (2014-188 and 2014-215; Figure 4). Treatment of these samples with formic acid yielded conodonts along with brachiopods, ichthyoliths, Foraminifera, bryozoans, ostracods, trilobite fragments and placoid scales, some of which were silicified. A total of 41 conodont elements were obtained by dissolving 97 kg of limestone. A large number of the extracted conodont specimens were broken, but some were suitable for taxonomic investigation (Figures 7 and 8). The conodonts were uniformly of black colour corresponding to conodont alteration index (CAI) 5 of Epstein et al. (1977) (Figure 9). The surface of the conodont skeletons is generally well-preserved, exemplified by the preservation of honeycomb structures on the platform of segminiplanate elements (Figures 7 and 8). Obvious evidence indicating reworking such as abrasion was not found. Both the outcrop samples and the float samples yielded Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller), Mesogondolella sp. and Sweethognathus hanzhongensis (Wang) (Figures 7 and 8). Thus, the conodont assemblages from the middle part of Section 2 and the floats are identical.

Figure 5.

Stratigraphic columns of the studied sections. The samples from the outcrop (2014-12, 2014-236) were obtained from the horizon with the fossil occurrence mark.

img-z6-7_105.jpg

It is noteworthy that some of our specimens retain the basal bodies of conodont elements, which are relatively fragile tissues that occupy the basal part of the element (Donoghue, 1998). Basal bodies of conodonts are fragile due to having less densely mineralized structures and are also easily broken off from the rest of the element, the more resistant crown (Donoghue, 1998; Souquet and Goudemand, 2019). Therefore, the basal bodies of conodonts are rarely preserved and poorly described. In our samples, some specimens of Mesogondolella retain the basal bodies as white to transparent tissues (Figure 9). It is rather surprising that the fragile basal bodies were found in conodonts from sedimentary rocks that have experienced considerable thermal maturation and tectonic deformation during subduction-accretion.

Figure 6.

1, Outcrop photograph of the horizon from which samples 2013-12 and 2014-236 were obtained. The sample for observation of fusulinids was obtained from the point of the arrow. 2, Photomicrograph of Parafusulina yabei Hanzawa from Section 2 observed in thin section through transmitted light.

img-z7-1_105.jpg

We also observed fusulinids from the sample obtained from Section 2. Observation of thin sections confirmed the presence of Parafusulina yabei Hanzawa (Figure 6.2). Since the range of Parafusulina yabei defines the Parafusulina yabei Zone of Kobayashi (2006), our finding assures that the sampled horizon is within this fusulinid biozone (Figure 3). This is consistent with the results of Tazawa et al. (2016) as well as the position and lithofacies of the studied section (Figures 3, 4 and 5).

Discussion

Age

Here, we will discuss the age of our samples based on the specimens obtained in this study.

Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller) is a widely distributed species found from western USA (Youngquist et al., 1951; Mytton et al., 1983; Behnken et al., 1986; Wardlaw and Collinson, 1986; Lambert et al., 2007), Svalbard (Szaniawski and Malkowski, 1979; Nakrem, 1991), central Tibet (Yuan et al., 2016), South China (Wang, 1994; Zhang et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2017) and Japan (Igo, 1981). Based on a global compilation of conodont occurrences, the range of M. idahoensis falls within the late Kungurian (latest Cisuralian; latest early Permian) (Henderson, 2016). Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang) has been reported from Shaanxi (Wang, 1978), Guangxi (Mei et al., 2002; Sun et al., 2017) and Guizhou (Mei et al., 1999) of South China, Oman (Kozur and Wardlaw, 2010) and Tunisia (Angiolini et al., 2008). Based on a compilation of these data, the range of S. hanzhongensis is from the Kungurian–Roadian (Cisuralian–Guadalupian) boundary to the late Capitanian (latest Guadalupian; latest middle Permian) (Henderson, 2016). According to high-resolution investigations in Guangxi (Sun et al., 2017) and Guizhou (Mei et al., 1999), S. hanzhongensis begins to occur below the first occurrence (FO) of Jinogondolella nankingensis (Ching), which is a marker for the Cisuralian–Guadalupian boundary (i.e., the Kungurian–Roadian boundary) (Henderson et al., 2012). Thus, the range of S. hanzhongensis is from the latest Kungurian to late Capitanian. The co-occurrence of M. idahoensis and S. hanzhongensis narrows the age of our samples to the latest Kungurian (latest early Permian). Our age assignment is consistent with the brachiopod-based age by Tazawa et al. (2016). Comparison with the fusulinid-based age assignment is a little more complicated, as noted below.

Figure 7.

SEM photographs of conodonts obtained in this study. 1–7, Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist et al.); 1, KFM-1999 from 2013-12, Section 2; 2, KFM-2002 from 2014-215, float; 3, KFM-2003 from 2014-215, float; 4, KFM-2004 from 2014-215, float; 5, KFM-2008 from 2014-236, Section 2; 6, KFM-2000 from 2014-188, float; 7, KFM-2001 from 2014-188, float. a, upper view; b, lateral view; c, basal view.

img-z8-1_105.jpg

Figure 8.

SEM photographs of conodonts obtained in this study. 1, 2, Mesogondolella sp.; 1, KFM-2005 from 2014-215, float; 2, KFM-2006 from 2014-215, float; 3–5, Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang); 3, KFM-2009 from 2014-236, Section 2; 4, KFM-2010 from 2014-236, Section 2; 5, KFM-2007 from 2014-215, float. a, upper view; b, lateral view; c, basal view.

img-z9-1_105.jpg

Figure 9.

Photographs of conodonts obtained in this study. 1–3, Conodonts with basal bodies. Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist et al.). a, lateral view; b, basal view. 1, KFM-1999; 2, KFM-2000; 3, KFM-2001; 4, 5, conodonts without basal bodies. 4, Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist et al.) KFM-2008, basal view; 5, Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang) KFM-2009.

img-z10-1_105.jpg

When first established in the Izuru and Nabeyama formations, the Parafusulina nakamigawai Zone and the middle part of the Parafusulina tochigiensis Zone were respectively correlated to the early middle Permian (Kubergandian in the Tethyan Scale) and the middle middle Permian (Murgabian in the Tethyan Scale) (Kobayashi, 2006). This means that the Parafusulina yabei Zone, which lies between the Parafusulina nakamigawai and Parafusulina tochigiensis zones, is within the middle Permian. However, correlation with the global standard Geological Time Scale (Henderson et al., 2012) was not determined, which can now be attempted based on conodonts from our samples and previous studies (Igo, 1981).

The co-occurrence of M. idahoensis and S. hanzhongensis in our samples indicate that the age of the Parafusulina yabei Zone includes the latest Kungurian. Previously, M. idahoensis has been found to occur with Diplognathodus lanceolatus Igo from the lower part of the Nabeyama Formation in Yamasuge in Kuzuu (Igo, 1981; see Figure 2 for location). The latter species is identical to S. hanzhongensis (see Plate 9 Figures 15, 7, 8, 13 of Igo, 1981), and is here considered as a junior synonym of S. hanzhongensis. This is concordant with the fact that the stratigraphic range of both “D. lanceolatus” and S. hanzhongensis overlap in their lower part with the range of M. idahoensis (in the uppermost Kungurian). Because the horizons in Yamasuge span a large part of the Parafusulina yabei Zone of Kobayashi (2006) (compare Text-fig. 4 of Igo, 1981 and “YS” in Figure 3 of this paper), much of the Parafusulina yebei Zone is probably of latest Kungurian age. The upper part of the Nabeyama Formation in Nagaami, which is assigned to the Parafusulina tochigiensis Zone of Kobayashi (2006), yields “D. lanceolatus” but lacks M. idahoensis (Igo, 1981). Therefore, the Parafusulina tochigiensis Zone may be of Guadalupian age (Henderson, 2016).

Biogeography

Our samples are characterized by the co-occurrence of M. idahoensis and S. hanzhongensis. As mentioned above, the co-occurrence of the two species in the lower part of the Nabeyama Formation can also be observed in the illustrations of Igo (1981) (respectively treated as Neogondolella idahoensis and Diplognathodus lanceolatus in his paper). According to Igo (1981), some horizons from the Yamasuge area in Kuzuu, which are roughly correlative with the studied section in Ogama (Figure 2), yield abundant specimens of both “D. lanceolatus” and M. idahoensis. Although the specimens obtained in our study are not numerous, they seem to represent major constituents of a typical latest Kungurian conodont fauna recorded in the Nabeyama Formation.

Outside Japan, the co-occurrence of M. idahoensis and S. hanzhongensis has been reported from South China (Sun et al., 2017), but not from other geographic areas. Apart from Japan and South China, almost all of the localities of M. idahoensis are in Svalbard that was located in northern high latitudes (Szaniawski and Malkowski, 1979; Nakrem, 1991) and the northwestern Pangaean margin, where the northern gyre of the Panthalassa would have brought cold waters from the north (Youngquist et al., 1951; Mytton et al., 1983; Behnken et al., 1986; Wardlaw and Collinson, 1986; Lambert et al., 2007). An exception is central Tibet that was positioned in southern mid latitudes (Yuan et al., 2016). Hence, this species is regarded to represent the cool water province of the north Panthalassa and Boreal Ocean (Mei and Henderson, 2001; Henderson and Mei, 2007), while it also inhabited parts of cool waters of the southern hemisphere. In contrast, Kungurian species of Sweetognathus are abundant only in equatorial regions, and therefore are regarded as warm water taxa (Mei and Henderson, 2001; Mei et al., 2002). In particular, S. hanzhongensis are limited to South China, Oman and Tunisia, which were all positioned in low latitudes (Wang, 1978; Mei et al., 2002; Angiolini et al., 2008; Kozur and Wardlaw, 2010; Sun et al., 2017). Thus, a fauna that includes M. idahoensis and S. hanzhongensis as main constituents, such as that suggested for the Nabeyama Formation and perhaps South China, is irregular in terms of conodont provincialism. It is possible that pelagic Panthalassa and South China were part of a biogeographic province where cool water taxa and warm water taxa coexisted during the latest Kungurian, and further research on faunal compositions will shed light on the significance of these provinces.

Conclusions

We obtained well-preserved specimens of Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller) and Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang) from limestones of the Parafusulina yabei Zone of the Nabeyama Formation in Ogama, Kuzuu area, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. The conodonts indicate a latest Kungurian age, which is consistent with brachiopods reported from the same locality. The conodont data indicate that the Parafusulina yabei fusulinid biozone includes, and is probably mostly correlated to the uppermost Kungurian. Biogeographically, our data suggests that the conodont fauna of the Nabeyama Formation may have been characterized by mixed cool water and warm water taxa in the latest Kungurian.

Systematic palaeontology

Multielement taxonomy of Permian conodonts is still debated at the genus level (Henderson and Mei, 2003). Therefore, only the synonymy for the P1 element is presented. All specimens are deposited in the Kuzuu Fossil Museum.

Class Conodonta Eichenberg, 1930
Order Ozarkodinida Dzik, 1976
Superfamily Gondolellacea Lindström, 1970
Family Gondolellidae Lindström, 1970
Genus Mesogondolella Kozur

  • Type species.—Gondolella bisseli Clark and Behnken.

  • Remarks.Mesogondolella was defined for segminiplanate P1 elements with the following features: a platform that is not reduced; no sculptures on the platform or only weak serration on the anterior part of the platform; no free blade; a lower surface with shallow V-shaped keel; a terminal basal pit. Species with serrations on the anterior part of the platform were separated to the genus Jinogondolella (Mei and Wardlaw, 1994). Consequently, Mesogondolella is restricted to species with an unornamented platform (Lambert et al., 2007). The multielement apparatus of species of Mesogondolella was proposed by Lambert et al. (2007).

  • Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller)
    Figure 7

  • Gondolella idahoensis Youngquist, Hawley and Miller, 1951, p. 361, pl. 54, figs. 1–3, 14, 15; Clark and Mosher, 1966, p. 388, pl. 47, figs. 9–12.

  • Neogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller). Clark et al., 1979, pl. 1, fig. 10; Szaniawski and Malkowski, 1979, p. 246–247, pl. 4, figs. 1–4, 6 (only), pl. 5, fig. 5?; Wang and Wang, 1981, p. 230, pl. 2, figs. 15, 23; Behnken et al., 1986, p. 179–181, figs. 4.12–16, 4.18; Wardlaw and Collinson, 1986, figs. 17.11, 12; Wang, 1994, p. 211, pl. 3, figs. 3–6 (only); Kozur, 1995, pl. 3, fig. 18.

  • Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller). Wardlaw, 2000, p. 44, pl. 3–10, figs. 1–3; Lambert et al., 2007, pp. 215–216, figs. 4e, 6j.

  • Mesogondolella idahoensis idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley and Miller). Henderson and Mei, 2003, pl. 2, fig. 15; Zhang et al., 2010, p. 152, figs. 3H, 3Q–3R.

  • Mesogondolella? cf. idahoensis (Youngquist et al.). Sun et al., 2017, pl. 5, fig. 4.

  • Material.—One specimen each from two samples from the outcrop (KFM-1999 from 2013-12 and KFM-2008 from 2014-236), and five specimens from float samples (KFM-2000, 2001 from 2014-188 and KFM-2002–2004 from 2014-215).

  • Description.—The specimens obtained in our study are segminiplanate elements characterised by a markedly high and thick terminal cusp. The cusp is around 3 times higher than the posterior denticles. The cusp is weakly reclined to the posterior. The denticles are low and discrete in the posterior, and become higher and fused towards the anterior. The low posterior denticles are circular in cross section, while the higher anterior denticles are laterally compressed. The platform runs the full length of the element and is widest around mid-length. The platform tapers anteriorly, while its lateral margins are sub-parallel in the posterior half. The posterior end of the platform is a rounded square shape in upper and basal views. The keel has a wide v-shaped groove ending around a terminally located basal pit surrounded by a wide loop.

  • Remarks.—The features of our specimens agree well with those of Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist et al.). Although the anterior denticles of M. idahoensis were originally described to be low and widely spaced (Henderson and Mei, 2003, Plate 2 Figure 15; holotype), forms with high, closely spaced and fused anterior denticles have been reported to occur alongside such forms (Behnken et al., 1986; Lambert et al., 2007, Figures 4d, e; Figures 4.14, 16; Wardlaw and Collinson, 1986, Figure 17.11). Hence, we regard that our specimens belong to M. idahoensis.

  • Mesogondolella idahoensis is similar to Mesogondolella lamberti Mei and Henderson in denticulation and platform morphology. The latter was split from M. idahoensis as a new subspecies by Mei and Henderson (2002), then elevated to species status by Lambert et al. (2007). M. idahoensis can be separated from M. lamberti by having a larger cusp.

  • Mesogondolella siciliensis (Kozur) has a similar denticulation to M. idahoensis, but differs in that the cusp of the former is at most only slightly larger than the posterior denticles. Furthermore, the platform of the former is widest at the middle and tapers posteriorly, while that of the latter has sub-parallel lateral margins from the middle to the posterior.

  • Mesogondolella spp.
    Figures 8.1, 8.2

  • Material.—Two specimens (KFM-2005, 2006) from a float sample (2014-215).

  • Remarks.—These specimens differ from M. idahoensis in having very high and fused anterior denticles. The specimen illustrated in Figure 8.1 has a thick cusp, has a square posterior end in upper and basal views, and is strongly arched in lateral view. The specimen illustrated in Figure 8.2 has a similar cusp, but has a more rounded posterior end in upper and basal views, and is less arched in lateral view. Therefore, these two specimens may belong to different species, although the preservation is too poor to make a conclusion.

  • Genus Sweetognathus Clark

  • Type species.—Spathognathodus whitei Rhodes.

  • Remarks.—Sweetognathus is represented by carminiscaphate P1 elements with pustulose ornamentation on a flat-topped carina that passes gradually into the anterior blade (Mei et al., 2002).

  • Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang)
    Figures 8.3–8.5

  • Gnathodus hanzhongensis Wang, 1978, p. 217, pl. 1, figs. 33–35, 40, 41.

  • Diplognathodus lanceolatus Igo, 1981, p. 30–31, pl. 9, figs. 1–5, 7, 8, 13.

  • Sweetognathus iranicus hanzhongensis (Wang). Mei et al., 2002, p. 85, fig. 10.6–10.12; Angiolini et al., 2008, fig. 7.

  • Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang). Sun et al., 2017, p. 60, pl. 3, fig. 15–18, pl. 7, figs. 9–10.

  • Material.—Two specimens (KFM-2009, 2010) from a sample from the outcrop (2014-236) and one specimen (KFM-2007) from a float sample (2014-217).

  • Description.—The specimens are carminiscaphate elements with an anterior blade of fused denticles and a posterior process that is formed above an expanded basal cavity. In lateral view, the anterior blade is the highest part of the element, and the upper margin decreases height gradually to the posterior end where it meets the basal margin. The carina on the posterior process is composed of a low and narrow row of pustulose nodes that continues to the posterior end. The anterior blade is composed of laterally compressed denticles that are fused to around 90% of its height. The anterior three denticles of the blade are subequal in height. The anterior blade and carina are connected by a narrow carinal ridge, which is positioned at the mid-length of the unit and above the anteriormost part of the basal cavity. In lateral view the length of this ridge is around three times the width of the carinal nodes. The basal cavity occupies around 60% of the basal margin in lateral view. In upper and basal views, the basal cavity tapers both anteriorly and posteriorly. The upper surface of the basal cavity is unornamented.

  • Remarks.—The characteristics of our specimens agree well with those of Sweetognathus hanzhongensis (Wang). The carinal ridge that connects the anterior blade with the posterior nodes is the key feature that differentiates this species from others. Note that Mei et al. (2002) regarded this species to be a geographical subspecies of Sweetognathus iranicus, and treated it as S. iranicus hanzhongensis.

  • Sweetognathus iranicus (Kozur) is similar, but differs from S. hanzhongensis in having discrete nodes instead of a ridge where the anterior blade connects with the posterior part of the carina. In addition, S. iranicus typically has laterally broader nodes on the carina.

  • Diplognathodus lanceolatus Igo from Panthalassic seamount capping limestones in Kuzuu and Mt. Ibuki in Japan has all the features of S. hanzhongensis, including a carinal ridge that connects the anterior blade with the posterior nodes. The stratigraphic distribution of D. lanceolatus is in the middle Permian, consistent with that of S. hanzhongensis. Therefore, we regard that D. lanceolatus is a junior synonym of S. hanzhongensis.

  • Acknowledgements

    We are deeply grateful for Ichiro Morishita (Senba, Sano City, Tochigi Prefecture) for allowing our field survey in his property. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Yukio Miyake for his assistance in the field and fossil extraction. We are also grateful to Toshihiro Tada of the University of Tokyo for his assistance in the field. We thank Nanami Suzuki of the University of Tokyo for supporting us during SEM photography. We express our appreciation to Sachiko Agematsu and an anonymous reviewer for their comments that helped improve the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    Angiolini, L., Chaouachi, C., Soussi, M., Verna, V., Davydov, V. I., Henderson, C. M., Nicora, A., Rettori, R. and Carabelli, L., 2008: New fossil findings and discovery of conodonts in the Guadalupian of Jebel Tebaga de Medenine: Biostratigraphic implications. Permophiles, no. 51, p. 10–21. Google Scholar

    2.

    Behnken, F. H., Wardlaw, B. R. and Stout, L. N., 1986: Conodont biostratigraphy of the Permian Meade Peak phosphatic shale member, Phosphoria Formation, southeastern Idaho. Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, vol. 24, p. 169–190. Google Scholar

    3.

    Bender, H. and Stoppel, D., 1965: Perm-Conodonten. Geologishces Jahrbuch, vol. 82, p. 331–364. (in German with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    4.

    Branson, C. C., 1932: Discovery of conodonts in the Phosphoria Permian of Wyoming. Science, vol. 75, p. 337–338. Google Scholar

    5.

    Chernykh, V. V. and Reshetkova, N. P., 1987: Biostratigraphy and conodonts of Carboniferous-Permian boundary beds of western slope of southern and central Urals, 50 p. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Ural Scientific Center, Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Preprint, Sverdlovsk. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    6.

    Ching, Y., 1960: Conodonts from the Kufeng Suite (Formation) of Lungtan, Nanjing. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, vol. 8, p. 230–248. (in Chinese and EnglishGoogle Scholar

    7.

    Clark, D. L. and Behnken, F. H., 1970: Conodonts and biostratigraphy of the Permian. In, Sweet, W. C. and Bergstrom, S. M. eds., Symposium on conodont biostratigraphy, p. 415–439. Geological Society of America Memoirs, vol. 127, Geological Society of America, Boulder. Google Scholar

    8.

    Clark, D. L., Carr, T. R., Behnken, F. H., Wardlaw, B. R. and Collinson, J. W., 1979: Permian conodont biostratigraphy in the Great Basin. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, vol. 26, p. 143–150. Google Scholar

    9.

    Clark, D. L. and Ethington, R. L., 1962: Survey of Permian condonts in western North America. Brigham Young University Geological Studies, vol. 9, p. 102–114. Google Scholar

    10.

    Clark, D. L. and Mosher, L. C., 1966: Stratigraphic, geographic, and evolutionary development of the conodont genus Gondolella. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 40, p. 376–394. Google Scholar

    11.

    Conodont Research Group, 1972: Conodonts at the Permian-Triassic boundary in Japan—Conodonts from the basal part of the Adoyama formation—. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 78, p. 355–368. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    12.

    Conodont Research Group, 1974: Conodonts at the Permian-Triassic boundary in Japan—Stratigraphy and faunas of the Nabeyama and Adoyama formations in Karasawa area, southeast Ashio Mountains—. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 28, p. 86–98. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    13.

    Donoghue, P. C., 1998: Growth and patterning in the conodont skeleton. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 353, p. 633–666. Google Scholar

    14.

    Dzik, J., 1976: Remarks on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, vol. 21, p. 395–455. Google Scholar

    15.

    Eichenberg, W., 1930: Conodonten aus dem Culm des Harzes. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, vol. 12, p. 177–182. (in GermanGoogle Scholar

    16.

    Epstein, A. G., Epstein, J. B. and Harris, L. D., 1977: Conodont color alteration—an index to organic metamorphism. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, series 995, p. 1–27. Google Scholar

    17.

    Fujimoto, H., 1961: Explanatory Text of the Geological Map of Japan, Scale 1:50000, Tochigi. Geological Survey of Japan, Kawasaki. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    18.

    Hayashi, S., 1971: Conodonts from the Nabeyama Formation, Kuzuu District, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 25, p. 251–257. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    19.

    Henderson, C. M., 2016: Permian conodont biostratigraphy. Geological Society of London, Special Publications, vol. 450, p. 119–142. Google Scholar

    20.

    Henderson, C. M., Davydov, V. I., Wardlaw, B. R., Gradstein, F. M. and Hammer, O., 2012: The Permian Period. In, Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D. and Ogg, G. M. eds., The geologic time scale 2012, vol. 2, p. 653–679, The Geological Society, London. Google Scholar

    21.

    Henderson, C. M. and Mei, S., 2003: Stratigraphic versus environmental significance of Permian serrated conodonts around the Cisuralian–Guadalupian boundary: new evidence from Oman. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 191, p. 301–328. Google Scholar

    22.

    Henderson, C. M. and Mei, S., 2007: Geographical clines in Permian and lower Triassic gondolellids and its role in taxonomy. Palaeoworld, vol. 16, p. 190–201. Google Scholar

    23.

    Igo, Hisaharu, 1981: Permian conodont biostratigraphy of Japan. Palaeontological Society of Japan, Special Papers, vol. 24, p. 1–51. Google Scholar

    24.

    Igo, Hisaharu, 1989: Mixed conodont elements from Hachiman Town, Mino Terrane, central Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 156, p. 270–285. Google Scholar

    25.

    Igo, Hisaharu and Hisada, K., 1986: Lower Permian conodonts from the Kawanori Formation of the southwestern Kanto Mountains, Tokyo. Transactions and Proceedings of Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 144, p. 516–527. Google Scholar

    26.

    Igo, Hisayoshi, 1964: Fusulinids from the Nabeyama Formation (Permian), Kuzu, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Memoirs of the Mejiro Gakuen Woman's Junior College, vol. 1, p. 1–28. Google Scholar

    27.

    Igo, Hisayoshi, 1972: Conodonts, as a new index fossil in Japan. Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), vol. 81, p. 142–151. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    28.

    Igo, Hisayoshi and Igo, Hisaharu, 1977: Upper Permian Fusulinaceans contained in the pebbles of the basal conglomerate of the Adoyama Formation, Kuzu, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, no. 106, p. 89–99. Google Scholar

    29.

    Igo, Hisayoshi and Koike, T., 1966: Recent progress of conodont research in Asia. Mejiro Gakuen Woman's Junior College, Memoirs, vol. 3, p. 9–17. Google Scholar

    30.

    Ishida, K., 1977: Reexamination of the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic formations in the Southern Zone of the Chichibu Belt in eastern Shikoku by means of conodonts and fusulinids. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 83, p. 227–240. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    31.

    Ishida, K., 1979: Studies of the South Zone of the Chichibu Belt in Shikoku, Part 2—Stratigraphy and structure around Nagayasuguchi Dam, Tokushima Prefecture—. Journal of Science, University of Tokushima, vol. 12, p. 61–92. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    32.

    Ishida, K., 1985: Pre-Cretaceous sediments in the southern North Zone of the Chichibu Belt in Tokushima Prefecture, Shikoku. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 91, p. 553–567. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    33.

    Isozaki, Y., Maruyama, S., Aoki, K., Nakama, T., Miyashita, A. and Otoh, S., 2010: Geotectonic Subdivision of the Japanese Islands Revisited: Categorization and definition of elements and boundaries of Pacific-type (Miyashiro-type) orogen. Journal of Geography, vol. 119, p. 999–1053. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    34.

    Isozaki, Y., Maruyama, S. and Furuoka, F., 1990: Accreted oceanic materials in Japan. Tectonophysics, vol. 181, p. 179–205. Google Scholar

    35.

    Kamata, Y., 1996: Tectonostratigraphy of the sedimentary complex in the southern part of the Ashio Terrane, central Japan. Science Reports of the Institute of Geoscience, University of Tsukuba, Section B, vol. 17, p. 71–107. Google Scholar

    36.

    Kamata, Y., 1997: Reconstruction of the chert-clastic sequence of the Ashio Terrane in the Kuzuu area, central Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 103, p. 343–356. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    37.

    Kitao, K., 1996: Middle and upper Permian conodont biostratigraphy in bedded cherts of the Mino Terrane, central Japan. Journal of Geosciences, Osaka City University, vol. 39, p. 61–81. Google Scholar

    38.

    Kobayashi, F., 1979: Petrography and sedimentary environment of the Permian Nabeyama limestone in the Kuzuu area, Tochigi Prefecture, central Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 10, p. 627–642. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    39.

    Kobayashi, F., 2006: Middle Permian foraminifers of the Izuru and Nabeyama Formations in the Kuzu area, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan Part 1. Schwagerinid, neoschwagerinid, and verbeekinid fusulinoideans. Paleontological Research, vol. 10, p. 37–59. Google Scholar

    40.

    Koike, T., Igo, Hy., Igo, Hh. and Kinoshita, T., 1974: Geological significance of the unconformity between the Permian Nabeyama and Triassic Adoyama Formations in the vicinity of Kuzuu, Tochigi Prefecture. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 80, p. 293–306. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    41.

    Kojima, S., Hayasaka, Y., Hiroi, Y., Matsuoka, A., Sano, H., Sugamori, Y., Suzuki, N., Takemura, S., Tsujimori, T. and Uchino. T., 2016: 2b Pre-Cretaceous accretionary complexes. In, Moreno, T., Wallis, S., Kojima, T. and Gibbons, W. eds., The Geology of Japan, p. 61–100. The Geological Society, London. Google Scholar

    42.

    Kozur, H., 1989: The taxonomy of the gondolellid conodonts in the Permian and Triassic. Courier Forschungs Institut Senckenberg, vol. 117, p. 385–406. Google Scholar

    43.

    Kozur, H., 1995: Permian conodont zonation and its importance for the Permian stratigraphic standard scale. Geologisch Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, vol. 20, p. 165–205. Google Scholar

    44.

    Kozur, H. W. and Wardlaw, B. R., 2010: The Guadalupian conodont fauna of Rustaq and Wadi Wasit, Oman and a West Texas connection. Micropaleontology, vol. 56, p. 213–231. Google Scholar

    45.

    Lambert, L. L., Wardlaw, B. R. and Henderson, C. M., 2007: Mesogondolella and Jinogondolella (Conodonta): Multielement definition of the taxa that bracket the basal Guadalupian (Middle Permian Series) GSSP. Palaeoworld, vol. 16, p. 208–221. Google Scholar

    46.

    Laya, J. C., Tucker, M. E., Gröcke, D. R. and Perez-Huerta, A., 2013: Carbon, oxygen and strontium isotopic composition of low-latitude Permian carbonates (Venezuelan Andes): climate proxies of tropical Pangea. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, vol. 376, p. 367–385. Google Scholar

    47.

    Leven, E. J., 2003: The Permian stratigraphy and fusulinids of the Tethys. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, vol. 109, p. 267–280. Google Scholar

    48.

    Lindström, M., 1970: A suprageneric taxonomy of the conodonts. Lethaia, vol. 3, p. 427–445. Google Scholar

    49.

    Makino, Y., 1976: On the stratigraphy of the Chichibu System in the Kashiwagi district, central part of the Kii Mountainland, central Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 82, p. 297–310. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    50.

    Matsuda, T., 1980: Discovery of Permian-Triassic mixed conodont assemblage from the Akasaka Limestone, Gifu Prefecture. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 86, p. 41–44. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    51.

    Matsuda, T. and Isozaki, Y., 1991: Well-documented travel history of Mesozoic pelagic chert in Japan: from remote ocean to subduction zone. Tectonics, vol. 10, p. 475–499. Google Scholar

    52.

    Mei, S. and Henderson, C. M., 2001: Evolution of Permian conodont provincialism and its significance in global correlation and paleo-climate implication. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 170, p. 237–260. Google Scholar

    53.

    Mei, S. and Hendersom, C. M., 2002: Conodont definition of the Kungurian (Cisuralian) and Roadian (Guadalupian) boundary. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir, vol. 19, p. 529–551. Google Scholar

    54.

    Mei, S., Henderson, C. M. and Wardlaw, B. R., 2002: Evolution and distribution of the conodonts Sweetognathus and Iranognathus and related genera during the Permian, and their implications for climate change. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 180, p. 57–91. Google Scholar

    55.

    Mei, S. and Wardlaw, B. R., 1994: Jinogondolella: a new genus of Permian gondolellids. Abstracts to International Symposium on Permian Stratigraphy, Environments and Resources with International Meetings of Pangea Project GSGP, IGCP, vol. 306, p. 28–31. Google Scholar

    56.

    Mei, S. L., Shi, X. Y., Chen, X. F., Sun, K. Q. and Yan, J. X., 1999: Permian Cisuralian and Guadalupian sequence stratigraphy in south Guizhou and central Guangxi and its relation to conodont evolution. Earth Science–Journal of China University of Geoscience, vol. 24, p. 21–31. Google Scholar

    57.

    Mytton, J. W., Morgan, W. A. and Wardlaw, B. R., 1983: Stratigraphic relations of Permian units, Cassia Mountains, Idaho. In, Miller, D. M., Todd, V. R. and Howard, K. A. eds., Tectonic and stratigraphic studies in the eastern Great Basin, p. 281–303. Geological Society of America Memoir, vol. 157, Geological Society of America, Boulder. Google Scholar

    58.

    Nakrem, H. A., 1991: Conodonts from the Permian succession of Bjornoya (Svalbard). Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, vol. 71, p. 235–248. Google Scholar

    59.

    Nishikane, Y., Kaiho, K., Takahashi, S., Henderson, C. M., Suzuki, N. and Kanno, M., 2011: The Guadalupian-Lopingian boundary (Permian) in a pelagic sequence from Panthalassa recognized by integrated conodont and radiolarian biostratigraphy. Marine Micropaleontology, vol. 78, p. 84–95. Google Scholar

    60.

    Shen, S., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Yuan, D., Chen, B., He, W., Mu, L., Lin, W., Wang, W., Chen, J., Wu, Q., Cao, C., Wang, Y. and Wang, X., 2018: Permian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Science China Earth Sciences, vol. 62, p. 154–188. Google Scholar

    61.

    Shen, S. Z., Yuan, D. X., Henderson, C. M., Tazawa, J. and Zhang, Y. C., 2012: Implications of Kungurian (Early Permian) conodonts from Hatahoko, Japan, for correlation between the Tethyan and international timescales. Micropaleontology, vol. 58, p. 505–522. Google Scholar

    62.

    Sobajima, T., 1972: Conodonts from the Permian Akasaka Limestone. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 26, p. 175–176. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    63.

    Sobolev, N. N. and Nakrem, H. A., 1996: Middle Carboniferous-Lower Permian conodonts of Novaya Zemlya, 129 p. Norlsk Polarinstitutt, Oslo. Google Scholar

    64.

    Souquet, L. and Goudemand, N., 2020: Exceptional basal-body preservation in some Early Triassic conodont elements from Oman. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 549, 109066. Google Scholar

    65.

    Sun, Y. D., Liu, X. T., Yan, J. X., Li, B., Chen, B., Bond, D. P. G., Joachimski, M. M., Wignall, P. B., Wang, X. and Lai, X. L., 2017: Permian (Artinskian to Wuchapingian) conodont biostratigraphy in the Tieqiao section, Laibin area, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 465, p 42–63. Google Scholar

    66.

    Sweet, W. C., 1988: The Conodonta: Morphology, Taxonomy, Paleoecology, and Evolutionary History of a Long-extinct Animal Phylum, 212 p. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

    67.

    Szaniawski, H. and Malkowski, K., 1979: Conodonts from the Kapp Starostin Formation (Permian) of Spitsbergen. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, vol. 24, p. 231–264. Google Scholar

    68.

    Tazawa, J. I., Okumura, Y., Miyake, Y. and Mizuhara, T., 2016: A Kungurian (early Permian) brachiopod fauna from Ogama, Kuzu Area, Central Japan, and Its Palaeobiogeographical Affinity with the Wolfcampian—Leonardian (early Permian) Brachiopod Fauna of West Texas, USA. Paleontological Research, vol. 20, p. 367–384. Google Scholar

    69.

    Teichert, C., Kummel, B. and Sweet, W. C., 1973: Permian-Triassic strata, Kuh-e-Ali Bashi, northwestern Iran. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, vol. 145, p. 359–472. Google Scholar

    70.

    Toriyama, R., 1967: The fusulinacean zones of Japan. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, vol. 18, p. 35–260. Google Scholar

    71.

    Toyohara, F., 1976: Geologic structures from Sangun-Yamaguchi zone to “Ryoke zone” in eastern Yamaguchi Prefecture. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 82, p. 99–111. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    72.

    Toyohara, F., 1977: Early Mesozoic tectonic development of the northwestern Chichibu Geosyncline in west Chugoku, Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Science, The University of Tokyo, Section 2, vol. 19, p. 253–336. Google Scholar

    73.

    Wakita, K. and Metcalfe, I., 2005: Ocean plate stratigraphy in East and Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, vol. 24, p. 679–702. Google Scholar

    74.

    Wang, C. and Wang, Z., 1981: Permian conodont biostratigraphy of China. Geological Society of America, Special Papers, vol. 187, p. 227–236. Google Scholar

    75.

    Wang, Z., 1978: Permian-Lower Triassic conodonts from the Liangshan area, southern Shaanxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, vol. 17, p. 213–231. Google Scholar

    76.

    Wang, Z., 1994: Early Permian conodonts from the Nashui section, Luodian of Guizhou. Palaeoworld, vol. 4, p. 203–224. Google Scholar

    77.

    Wardlaw, B. R., 2000: Guadalupian conodont biostratigraphy of the Glass and Del Norte Mountains. Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences, vol. 32, p. 37–87. Google Scholar

    78.

    Wardlaw, B. R. and Collinson, J. W., 1979: Youngest Permian conodont faunas from the Great Basin and Rocky Mountain regions. In, Sandberg, C. A. and Clark, D. L. eds., Conodont biostratigraphy of the Great Basin region and Rocky Mountains. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 26, p. 151–163. Department of Geology, Brigham University, Utah. Google Scholar

    79.

    Wardlaw, B. R. and Collinson, J. W., 1986: Paleontology and deposition of the Phosphoria Formation. Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, vol. 24, p. 107–142. Google Scholar

    80.

    Yamakita, S. and Otoh, S., 2000: Tectonostratigraphic division of accretionary-sedimentary complex of the Tamba-Mino-Ashio Belt and comparison with the Northern and Southern Chichibu Belts. Structural Geology, vol. 44, p. 5–32. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    81.

    Yanagimoto, Y., 1973: Stratigraphy and geological structure of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations in the vicinity of Kuzuu, Tochigi Prefecture. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 79, p. 441–451. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    82.

    Yoshida, S., 1956: Stratigraphical and tectonical studies in the district neighbouring the Kuzu Machi, Tochigi Prefecture. Bulletin of the Geological Committee of Hokkaido, vol. 32, p. 1–9. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    83.

    Youngquist, W., Hawley, R. W. and Miller, A. K., 1951: Phosphoria conodonts from southeastern Idaho. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 25, p. 356–364. Google Scholar

    84.

    Yuan, D. X., Zhang, Y. C., Shen, S. Z., Henderson, C. M., Zhang, Y. J., Zhu, T. X., An, X. Y. and Feng, H. Z., 2016: Early Permian conodonts from the Xainza area, central Lhasa Block, Tibet, and their palaeobiogeographical and palaeoclimatic implications. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, vol. 14, p. 365–383. Google Scholar

    85.

    Zhang, N., Henderson, C. M., Wenchen, X., Guoqing, W. and Haijing, S., 2010: Conodonts and radiolarians through the Cisuralian–Guadalupian boundary from the Pingxiang and Dachongling sections, Guangxi region, South China. Alcheringa, vol. 34, p. 135–160. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Author contributions

    Y. O. and T. M. collected the rock samples. T. M. extracted the conodonts from the host rock. S. M. is responsible for conodont taxonomy and Y. O. is responsible for fusulinid taxonomy. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

    © by the Palaeontological Society of Japan
    Shun Muto, Yohoko Okumura, and Takeshi Mizuhara "Late Kungurian Conodonts of Pelagic Panthalassa from Seamount-Capping Limestone in Ogama, Kuzuu, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan," Paleontological Research 25(2), 105-119, (1 April 2021). https://doi.org/10.2517/2020PR012
    Received: 18 July 2019; Accepted: 4 March 2020; Published: 1 April 2021
    KEYWORDS
    conodont
    Fusulinid
    Nabeyama Formation
    Panthalassa
    Permian
    Back to Top