Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2006 Relevance of Sunscreen Application Method, Visible Light and Sunlight Intensity to Free-radical Protection: A Study of ex vivo Human Skin
Rachel Haywood
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

With the continued rise in skin cancers worldwide there is a need for effective skin protection against sunlight damage. It was shown previously that sunscreens, which claimed UVA protection (SPF 20 ), provided limited protection against UV-induced ascorbate radicals in human skin. Here the results of an electron spin resonance (ESR) investigation to irradiate ex vivo human skin with solar-simulated light are reported. The ascorbate radical signal in the majority of skin samples was directly proportional to the irradiance over relevant sunlight intensities (0.9–2.9 mW cm−2). Radical production (substratum-corneum) by UV (wavelengths <400 nm) and visible components (>400 nm) was ∼67% and 33% respectively. Ascorbate radicals were in steady state concentration at low irradiance (∼1 mW cm−2 equivalent to UK sunlight), but at higher irradiance (∼3 mW cm−2) decreased with time, suggesting ascorbate depletion. Radical protection by a four star–rated sunscreen (with UVA protection) was optimal when applied as a thin film (40–60% at 2 mg cm−2) but less so when rubbed into the skin (37% at 4 mg cm−2 and no significant protection at 2 mg cm−2), possibly due to cream filling crevices, which reduced film thickness. This study validates ESR determinations of the ascorbate radical for quantitative protection measurements. Visible light contribution to radical production, and loss of protection when sunscreen is rubbed into skin, has implications for sunscreen design and use for the prevention of free-radical damage.

Rachel Haywood "Relevance of Sunscreen Application Method, Visible Light and Sunlight Intensity to Free-radical Protection: A Study of ex vivo Human Skin," Photochemistry and Photobiology 82(4), 1123-1131, (1 July 2006). https://doi.org/10.1562/2006-02-08-RA-799
Received: 8 February 2006; Accepted: 1 May 2006; Published: 1 July 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top