Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2013 Southern Range Extensions for the Critically Endangered Black-and-White Ruffed Lemur Varecia variegata and Greater Bamboo Lemur Prolemur simus
Author Affiliations +

The Vondrozo-Midongy rainforest corridor in south-eastern Madagascar is an example of a habitat corridor between otherwise disconnected protected areas, and is therefore considered important for the conservation of the endemic biodiversity of the island. Through several years of collaboration with local communities surrounding this corridor, WWF-Madagascar learned that members of some of these communities claimed the existence there of the black-and-white ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata) and the greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus), both regarded as Critically Endangered by the IUCN and not known by the scientific community to be present in the corridor. We therefore surveyed six sites in three communes in May 2010 to confirm this information. We made direct observations of Varecia variegata at two sites, which represent a southern extension to the known range of the species. We also found the characteristic feeding remains of Prolemur simus in the three most southerly sites, observations which also represent a major southern extension of the known range of this species. However, the feeding signs we found were old, at least a year old by our estimations, so we recommend further research to ascertain whether the population still exists there. The corridor is threatened by many anthropogenic pressures, and further reinforcement of the conservation program for the corridor is therefore likely to be necessary to ensure the viability of endangered lemurs in the region, and the role of the corridor in ensuring biological connectivity between the more substantial forests to the south and north.


The island of Madagascar, geographically isolated for around 90 million years (Mittermeier et al. 2010), is rich in endemic plants and animals (Goodman and Benstead 2003). Various studies have shown that the maintenance of this biological diversity depends on the conservation not only of disconnected protected areas, but also on the habitat corridors that permit biological exchange between them (Burel and Baudry 1999). The southern rainforest corridor between Vondrozo and the Midongy du Sud National Park is one such corridor that is thought to play an important role in the conservation of biodiversity in Madagascar. Within the framework of the project WWF MG0941.01—Counting LemursThe Biological Corridor Vondrozo-Midongy, WWF-Madagascar has been collaborating with local communities since 2004 for the conservation of the forest corridor in general, and in particular of lemurs. Members of some of these local communities claim the existence there of the black-and-white ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata) and the greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus) (WWF unpubl. data; Rakotonirina 2006), both Critically Endangered (IUCN 2010) and not known by the scientific community to be present in the corridor. Although having an overall (but patchy) distribution extending through much of the eastern rainforest belt, V. variegata is believed not to occur south of the Mananara River (Irwin et al. 2005; Mittermeier et al. 2008, 2010). Prolemur simus is thought to have suffered a major reduction in its distribution since sub-fossil times, and has never been recorded south of the Manampatrana River (Irwin et al. 2005; Wright et al. 2008; Mittermeier et al. 2010), although recent surveys show that it has in fact been largely overlooked in much of its extant range (Dolch et al. 2008; Ravaloharimanitra et al. 2011). Our study therefore aimed to confirm the presence of these two species in the corridor, which, if successful, would add considerably to its perceived conservation value, whilst also surveying for other lemur species and identifying threats to the lemur community and their habitat.


The Vondrozo-Midongy corridor is in the south-east of Madagascar (Fig. 1), and consists principally of low- and mid-altitude rainforest. Annual rainfall ranges from approximately 1,700 mm in the south of the corridor to 2,350 mm in the north. The climate shows marked seasonality, with the heaviest rains between December and March and a drier season from April or May to October (Repoblikan'i Madagascar 2006).

We surveyed six sites in three communes (Table 1); the sites selected based on information gathered previously by WWF project members from local communities regarding the potential presence of Varecia variegata or Prolemur simus. The commune of Vohimary was surveyed between 5 and 20 May 2010 by Rajaonson and Ratolojanahary, accompanied by Aimé Victor Tombotiana from Centre ValBio. The Bevata and Maliorano communes were surveyed between 2 and 21 May by Rakotonirina and Missirli.

Following courtesy visits to local authorities, we organized meetings with the local community associations responsible for the management of each survey site prior to undertaking the field research. We used these meetings to undertake rapid participatory research to gather local knowledge concerning the lemurs present in their sites and the distribution of bamboo, and to identify threats to the sites. We used photos of locally occurring lemur species to help us, and participatory mapping techniques (Jones et al. 2005) to map local features and landmarks. The results of these community meetings helped us identify areas most likely to support V. variegata, P. simus or other bamboo lemurs Hapalemur spp., and accompanied by local guides we then undertook the site visits. At Vohitrambo we made only a brief one-day visit, but we surveyed the other sites for three or four days each (Table 1), for eight to nine hours per day between 06h and 15h along existing trails and in areas of high bamboo density. We recorded the presence of lemurs through direct sightings whenever possible, but also through vocalizations (for Eulemur spp.) and feeding signs (for P. simus and Hapalemur spp.). The feeding signs of P. simus on large-stemmed bamboos as described by Dolch et al. (2004, 2008) and Ravaloharimanitra et al. (2011) are highly distinctive, and members of both survey teams had extensive prior experience in distinguishing between feeding remains of this species, Hapalemur aureus and H. griseus in Ranomafana National Park and elsewhere, which also allowed us to make approximate estimations of the relative age of the feeding signs. Additionally, we recorded signs of threats, including but not limited to habitat destruction, tree or bamboo cutting, artisanal mining, cattle grazing, and evidence of lemur hunting. We carried out nocturnal surveys at two sites, Marovato and Antanimora. Lemur nomenclature follows Mittermeier et al. (2010).

Table 1.

The sites surveyed during this study in May 2010, including the name of the local community association (COBA) responsible for their management.


Figure 1.

Map showing the location of our survey sites (black stars) in and around the Midongy-Vondrozo Corridor, south-eastern Madagascar, approximate forest cover (light grey), rivers (dark grey), and other selected localities (triangles). The Midongy du Sud National Park is indicated by diagonal lines.



We made direct sightings of Varecia variegata at two sites (Figs. 2 and 3), in the Vohimary and Bevata communes. We found old feeding signs of Prolemur simus at the three sites in the Maliorano commune (Tables 2 and 3), all on a species of large-stemmed bamboo which we cautiously identified as Cathariostachys sp. We also found fresh feeding signs at four sites that we believe to be of Hapalemur aureus, but in the absence of direct sightings we refer to them as Hapalemur cf. aureus in Tables 2 and 3. We were unable to distinguish between the feeding signs of Hapalemur griseus and H. meridionalis during the survey, neither was our single direct sighting sufficient to separate them, so we have combined our observations of these species in Table 2. We recorded an additional four species by our own direct or indirect observations, and two more, Lepilemur sp. and Daubentonia madagascariensis, based on local knowledge (Table 2).

Figures 2 and 3.

Varecia variegata at the Ambalavero site, May 2010. Photographs by A. Rajaonson.


Table 2.

Lemur species recorded in the Vondrozo-Midongy forest corridor, May 2010.



Varecia variegata

We found Varecia variegata at two of the six sites surveyed, Ambalavero and Vohitrambo. Vohitrambo is outside the remaining forest corridor, and the population of V. variegata here may not be naturally-occurring; we understand that a few captive individuals of the species were released by local people here around the year 2000 (L. Razafy Fara, unpubl. data). However, the Ambalavero site is in the remaining forest corridor, with no evidence of former release events. Its presence there suggests that the species may be more widely distributed within the corridor. Indeed, local people at the three southern sites surveyed (Antanimora, Marovato and Betonontsako) claimed that V. variegata existed in their region several years ago, although they suggested that they passed through their forests rather than being permanent residents (Rakotonirina 2006).

Both Ambalavero and Vohitrambo are south of the Mananara River, and therefore represent a southern extension to the known range of the species as given in most recent syntheses (Fig. 4; Irwin et al. 2005; Wilmé et al. 2006; Mittermeier et al. 2008, 2010). However, Vasey and Tattersall (2002, illustrated in their Fig. 2) also give a record just south of the Mananara River which appears to have been overlooked by subsequent authors. This observation was made in 1995 close to our observation in Vohitrambo (I. Tattersall, in litt.), suggesting that the species may indeed be naturally-occurring in this area, or perhaps conversely that the release event we refer to above in fact occurred prior to 1995.

Our photos of the animals observed at the Ambalavero site (Figs. 2 and 3) show that the black coloration of the shoulders and upper back is not continuous behind the neck, but is separated by a thick white longitudinal band, a pelage feature considered characteristic of the subspecies V. variegata variegata (Mittermeier et al. 2010, pp.455 and 464) although apparently also observed within the documented variation of V. variegata editorum (Mittermeier et al. 2010, pp.458 and 461), which Mittermeier et al. (2010) suggest in their distribution maps and English names to be the southern subspecies. However, these authors recognize in their text that the definition and distribution of Varecia subspecies is not clear and may require revision. Indeed, Vasey and Tattersall (2002) suggest that the majority (but not all) of records from the south of the species range are of the V. v. variegata coloration, including from the most southerly sites on both sides of the Mananara River, an observation consistent with our observations at Ambalavero. We therefore reiterate the recommendation of Mittermeier et al. (2008) that a study of the distribution and taxonomy of Varecia variegata should be considered a high conservation priority, and we suggest that such a study includes the newly discovered sites we report here.

Table 3.

Details of observations of Varecia variegata, Prolemur simus and Hapalemur cf. aureus 1made within the Vondrozo-Midongy forest corridor, May 2010.


Prolemur simus

We found the characteristic feeding remains of Prolemur simus in the three most southerly sites surveyed, in the commune of Maliorano. These observations represent a major southern extension of the known range of this species, which was not previously known south of the Manampatrana River (Fig. 5; Irwin et al. 2005; Wright et al. 2008; Mittermeier et al. 2010). The sites are located over 110 km south of the previously -known most southerly sites near Karianga (Wright et al. 2008), and approximately 90 km south of the Manampatrana River, near which some potential but unconfirmed sites for the species were reported by Rajaonson et al. (2010). This southern range extension follows a recent northern range extension reported by Ravaloharimanitra et al. (2011), and illustrates again the advantages of surveying for this species through a combination of gathering local knowledge and searching for feeding signs on large-stemmed bamboos (King and Chamberlan 2010; Ravaloharimanitra et al. 2011). However, the feeding signs we found were old, at least a year old by our estimations, and at two sites (Marovato and Antanimora) we found only a single feeding sign, compared to four feeding signs at Betonontsako. We therefore recommend further research at this latter site, which supports a high density of giant bamboo, to ascertain whether the population still exists here.

Other species

At four of the survey sites we found fresh feeding signs that we believe to be of Hapalemur aureus. Two of us (Rakotonirina and Rajaonson) have extensive experience of differentiating the feeding signs of H. aureus and H. griseus in the region of Ranomafana National Park, and the signs we found are identical to those of H. aureus. If confirmed, these sites represent a major southern range extension for this species (Irwin et al. 2005; Mittermeier et al. 2008, 2010); however, in the absence of direct sightings, we cannot be absolutely certain of the presence of H. aureus at the sites, so we recommend further research for confirmation. We also found feeding signs at four sites, and one direct sighting, that we attributed to Hapalemur griseus. However, based on the species distributions proposed by Mittermeier et al. (2010), these records may in fact be of H. meridionalis at some of the southern sites. It seems unlikely that these species can be reliably separated from feeding remains, and therefore further research is required to ascertain the distribution of these species in the study area. We recorded a further six species during the surveys (some only to generic level), none of which were unexpected based on current knowledge of species distributions as given by Mittermeier et al. (2010). The level of local knowledge concerning the presence of lemur species varied greatly between sites, and coupled with the relatively rapid nature of our surveys we almost certainly overlooked some species at each site.

Figure 4.

Map showing the Varecia variegata sites newly reported here (black stars), sites previously known to support V. variegata in south-eastern Madagascar (diamonds), approximate forest cover (light grey), major rivers (dark grey, with names), and other selected localities (named; NP = National Park). Locations of previous V. variegata sites are taken primarily from Wilmé et al. (2006), with additional sites from Deppe et al. (2007), Delmore et al. (2009) and Rajaonson et al. (2010).


Figure 5.

Map showing the Prolemur simus sites newly reported here (black stars), sites previously known to support P. simus in south-eastern Madagascar (diamonds), approximate forest cover (light grey), major rivers (dark grey, with names), and other selected localities (named; NP = National Park). Locations of previous P. simus sites are taken primarily from Wright et al. (2008), with additional sites from Meier and Rumpler (1987), Andriaholinirina et al. (2003), Delmore et al. (2009) and Rajaonson et al. (2010).


Threats and conservation

Our confirmation of the presence of Varecia variegata and Prolemur simus in the Vondrozo-Midongy corridor, both listed as Critically Endangered by IUCN (2010), illustrates the high conservation value of the area, and will hopefully stimulate increased awareness at a national and international level of the associated conservation challenges. The corridor is clearly threatened by many anthropogenic pressures. Longterm deforestation has resulted in the corridor currently existing as a very narrow strip of forest which is becoming increasingly fragmented and disturbed. WWF-Madagascar has been working with local populations surrounding the corridor since 2000 in the north, and since 2004 in the south, to ensure biological connectivity in the region. Many local community associations have been created since 2005, with the goal of transferring management responsibility of forest patches from regional government to the local communities themselves (WWF-Madagascar, unpubl. reports). In the Maliorano Commune, the three community associations responsible for the three sites we visited appeared to be well aware of the importance of biodiversity conservation in general, and of lemurs in particular. We found no evidence of lemur hunting in these three sites, which contrasts with the situation we found in the same area in 2006 when lemur hunting was common (Rakotonirina 2006). The cutting of trees for local use in these three sites also appeared to be less frequent than in 2006. However, forest disturbance remains a threat, cattle grazing and cutting of bamboos is still apparent, and local populations remain poor despite the development of various alternative economic opportunities through the WWF program.

At the more northerly survey sites, in the Commune of Vohimary, the forests we visited are generally smaller and more fragmented due to encroaching slash-and-burn agriculture, and the remaining forest areas are highly degraded. Artisanal mining is a principal cause of this degradation, and appears to have become the major source of income for the local populations. In addition, the Ambalavero site is being used as a route for trade in tobacco and locally-produced rum.

Considering these diverse pressures on a corridor already diminished in forest cover, the viability of the remaining lemur populations must surely be questioned. Further work is required to determine distributions, densities and viabilities of these populations, particularly of those species considered Critically Endangered such as Prolemur simus and Varecia variegata. Prolemur simus has a specialized diet dominated by large-stemmed bamboos (Tan 1999; Dolch et al. 2008; Ravaloharimanitra et al. 2011) and can exist in degraded habitats if bamboo is present and other, as yet undetermined, factors permit (Wright et al. 2009; Ravaloharimanitra et al. 2011). Varecia variegata, however, appears to be very sensitive to habitat loss and fragmentation (Vasey 2003), and recent local extinctions of the species have been recorded elsewhere, thought to have been driven by these factors coupled with hunting pressure (Beaucent and Fayolle 2008). Further reinforcement of the conservation program for the corridor is therefore likely to be necessary to ensure the survival of this and other species in the region, and consequently the role of the corridor in ensuring biological connectivity between the more substantial forests to the south and north.


We thank WWF-Sweden for financing the survey, and for their previous support of lemur conservation in the study region, WWF-MWIOPO for permission to publish our results, the Ministry of the Environment and Forests of the Government of Madagascar, the local authorities in the regions where we worked for their permission and participation, the community associations with whom we worked, Aimé Victor Tombotiana and all the local guides who helped with the field surveys, Odylle Ravaoarisoa and Zafindahy Georges, for their help in organizing the study, two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript, and The Aspinall Foundation for providing additional support for the survey.

Literature Cited

  1. V. N. Andriaholinirina , J. L. Fausser and J. C. Rabarivola . 2003. Étude comparative de Hapalemur simus (Gray, 1870) de deux sites de la province autonome de Fianarantsoa, Madagascar: forêt dégradée d'Ambolomavo et forêt secondaire de Parc National de Ranomafana. Lemur News 8: 9–13. Google Scholar

  2. F. Burel and J. Baudry . 1999. Ecologie du Paysage, Concepts, Méthodes et Applications. Ed. Tec et Doc, Paris. Google Scholar

  3. S. Beaucent and M. Fayolle . 2008. Étude de la communauté de lémuriens de la forêt d'Ambodiriana, NE Madagascar. Lemur News 13: 28–32. Google Scholar

  4. K. E. Delmore , M. F. Keller , E. E. Louis Jr . and S. E. Johnson . 2009. Rapid primatological surveys of the Andringitra forest corridors: direct observation of the greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus). Lemur News 14: 49–52. Google Scholar

  5. A. M. Deppe , M. Randriamiarisoa , K. Schütte and P. C. Wright . 2007. A brief lemur survey of the Ranomafana Andringitra corridor region in Tolongoina, southeast Madagascar. Lemur News 12: 43–46. Google Scholar

  6. R. Dolch , R. Hilgartner , J.-N. Ndriamiary and H. Randriamahazo . 2004. The grandmother of all bamboo lemurs: evidence for the occurrence of Hapalemur simus in fragmented rainforest surrounding the Torotorofotsy marshes, Central Eastern Madagascar. Lemur News 9: 24–26. Google Scholar

  7. R. Dolch , J. L. Fiely. J.-N. Ndriamiary , J. Rafalimandimby , R. Randriamampionona , S. E. Engberg and E. E. Louis Jr . 2008. Confirmation of the greater bamboo–lemur, Prolemur simus, north of the Torotorofotsy wetlands, eastern Madagascar. Lemur News 13: 14–17. Google Scholar

  8. S. M. Goodman and J. P. Benstead . 2003. The Natural History of Madagascar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

  9. M. T. Irwin , S. E. Johnson and P. C. Wright . 2005. The state of lemur conservation in south-eastern Madagascar: population and habitat assessments for diurnal and cathemeral lemurs using surveys, satellite imagery and GIS. Oryx 39: 204–218. Google Scholar

  10. IUCN. 2010. 2010 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Species Survival Commission (SSC), Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Website: <>. Google Scholar

  11. J. P. G. Jones , F. B. Andriahajaina , N. J. Hockley , A. Balmrord and O. R. Ravoahangimala . 2005. A multidisciplinary approach to assessing the sustainability of freshwater crayfish harvesting in Madagascar. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1863–1871. Google Scholar

  12. T. King and C. Chamberlan . 2010. Conserving the Critically Endangered greater bamboo lemur. Oryx 44: 167. Google Scholar

  13. B. Meier and Y. Rumpler . 1987. Preliminary survey of Hapalemur simus and of a new species of Hapalemur in eastern Betsileo, Madagascar. Primate Conserv. (8): 40–43. Google Scholar

  14. R. A. Mittermeier , J. U. Ganzhorn , W. R. Konstant , K. Glander , I. Tattersall , C. P. Groves , A. B. Rylands , A. Hapke , J. Ratsimbazafy , M. I. Mayor , E. E. Louis Jr ., Y. Rumpler , C. Schwitzer and R. M. Rasoloarison . 2008. Lemur diversity in Madagascar. Int. J. Primatol. 29: 1607–1656. Google Scholar

  15. R. A. Mittermeier , E. E. Louis Jr ., M. Richardson , C. Schwitzer , O. Langrand , A. B. Rylands , F. Hawkins , S. Rajaobelina , J. Ratsimbazafy , R. Rasoloarison , C. Roos , P. M. Kappeler and J. Mackinnon . 2010. Lemurs of Madagascar. 3rd edition. Conservation International, Arlington, VA. Google Scholar

  16. A. Rajaonson , M. Ratolojanahary , J. Ratsimbazafy , A. Feistner and T. King . 2010. Enquête préliminaire de la distribution des lémuriens de bambou dans et autour du Corridor forestier Fandriana-Vondrozo, Madagascar. Lemur News 15: 36–39. Google Scholar

  17. L. H. F. Rakotonirina 2006. Inventaire des lémuriens dans le Corridor forestier de Midongy du Sud. Final report for WWF-Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar. Google Scholar

  18. M. Ravaloharimanitra , T. Ratolojanahary , J. Rafalimandimby , A. Rajaonson , L. Rakotonirina , T. Rasolofoharivelo , J. N. Ndriamiary , J. Andriambololona , C. Nasoavina , P. Fanomezantsoa , J. C. Rakotoarisoa , J. Ratsimbazafy Youssouf , R. Dolch and T. King . 2011. Gathering local knowledge in Madagascar results in a major increase in the known range and number of sites for critically endangered greater bamboo lemurs (Prolemur simus). Int. J. Primatol. 32: 776–792. Google Scholar

  19. Repoblikan'i Madagascar2006. Politique Environnementale Régionale. Prescriptions Environnementales et Plan d'Actions. Région Atsimo Atsinanana, Madagascar. Antananarivo. Google Scholar

  20. C. L. Tan 1999. Group composition, home range size, and diet of three sympatric bamboo lemur species (genus Hapalemur) in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Int. J. Primatol. 20: 547–566. Google Scholar

  21. N. Vasey 2003. Varecia, raffed lemurs. In: The Natural History of Madagascar , S. M. Goodman, and J. P. Benstead (eds.), pp. 1332–1336. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

  22. N. Vasey and I. Tattersall . 2002. Do ruffed lemurs form a hybrid zone? Distribution and discovery of Varecia, with systematic and conservation implications. Am. Mus. Nov. (3376): 1–26. Google Scholar

  23. L. Wilmé , S. M. Goodman and J. U. Ganzhorn . 2006. Biogeographic evolution of Madagascar's microendemic biota. Science 312: 1063–1065. Google Scholar

  24. P. C. Wright , S. E. Johnson , M. T. Irwin , R. Jacobs , P. Schlichting , S. Lehman , E. E. Louis Jr ., S. J. Arrigo-Nelson , J.-L. Raharison , R. R. Rafalirarison , V. Razafindratsita , J. Ratsimbazafy , F. J. Ratelolahy , R. Dolch and C. Tan . 2008. The crisis of the critically endangered greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus). Primate Conserv. (23): 5–17. Google Scholar

  25. P. C. Wright, E. Larney, E. E. Louis Jr., R. Dolch and R. R. Rafalirarison . 2009. Greater bamboo lemur Prolemur simus (Gray, 1871). In Primates in Peril: The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates 2008–2010, R. A. Mittermeier et al. (eds.), pp.7–8. Primate Conserv. (24): 1–57. Google Scholar

Laingoniaina Herifito Fidèle Rakotonirina, Andry Rajaonson, Jaona Honoré Ratolojanahary, Jeannot Maxime Missirli, and Lala Razafy Fara "Southern Range Extensions for the Critically Endangered Black-and-White Ruffed Lemur Varecia variegata and Greater Bamboo Lemur Prolemur simus," Primate Conservation 26(1), 49-55, (1 February 2013).
Received: 15 March 2011; Published: 1 February 2013

Back to Top