How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2009 Single-Strand Annealing, Conservative Homologous Recombination, Nonhomologous DNA End Joining, and the Cell Cycle-Dependent Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced by Sparsely or Densely Ionizing Radiation
Marlis Frankenberg-Schwager, Anja Gebauer, Cordula Koppe, Hartmut Wolf, Elke Pralle, Dieter Frankenberg
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Frankenberg-Schwager, M., Gebauer, A., Koppe, C., Wolf, H., Pralle, E. and Frankenberg, D. Single-Strand Annealing, Conservative Homologous Recombination, Nonhomologous DNA End Joining, and the Cell Cycle-Dependent Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced by Sparsely or Densely Ionizing Radiation. Radiat. Res. 171, 265–273 (2009).

The cell cycle-dependent relative contributions of error-prone single-strand annealing (SSA), error-free conservative homologous recombination (HR), and potentially error-prone nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) to repair simple (induced by 200 kV X rays) or complex (induced by 241Am α particles) DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in Chinese hamster ovary cells are reported for the first time. Cells of the parental cell line AA8 and its derivatives UV41 (SSA-deficient), irs1SF (HR-deficient) and V3 (NHEJ-deficient) were synchronized in G1 or in S phase, and survival responses after exposure to either type of radiation were measured. It is demonstrated for the first time that in G1-phase SSA is negligible for the repair of DSBs of various complexities. HR-deficient cells exposed to X rays or α particles in G1 phase show enhanced radiosensitivity, but this does not necessarily mean that HR is important in G1 phase. NHEJ appears to be the most important (if not the only) mechanism in G1 phase acting efficiently on simple DSBs, but complex DSBs are a less preferred target. In contrast to X rays, NHEJ-deficient cells show no cell cycle-dependent variation in sensitivity to α particles. Surprisingly, when these cells are exposed to X rays in G1 phase, they are even more sensitive compared to α particles. It is also shown for the first time that in S phase all three mechanisms play a role in the repair of simple and complex DSBs. A defect in SSA confers radiosensitivity to cells in S phase, suggesting that the error-prone SSA mechanism is important for the repair of specific simple and complex DSBs that are not a substrate for HR or NHEJ. The most important mechanism in S phase for the repair of simple and complex DSBs is HR. This is also emphasized by the finding that irs1SF cells, after complementation of their HR defect by human XRCC3 cDNA, show a greater radioresistance than parental cells, whereas resistance to mitomycin C is only partially restored. Complementation confers a greater resistance to α particles than X rays, suggesting an important role of HR, especially for the repair of complex DSBs. In S phase, NHEJ is more important than SSA for the repair of simple DSBs, but SSA is more important than NHEJ for the repair of complex DSBs.

Marlis Frankenberg-Schwager, Anja Gebauer, Cordula Koppe, Hartmut Wolf, Elke Pralle, and Dieter Frankenberg "Single-Strand Annealing, Conservative Homologous Recombination, Nonhomologous DNA End Joining, and the Cell Cycle-Dependent Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced by Sparsely or Densely Ionizing Radiation," Radiation Research 171(3), 265-273, (1 March 2009). https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0784.1
Received: 1 August 2007; Accepted: 1 August 2008; Published: 1 March 2009
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top