How to translate text using browser tools
28 June 2010 Breast Cancer Risk from Different Mammography Screening Practices
Harmen Bijwaard, Alina Brenner, Fieke Dekkers, Teun van Dillen, Charles E. Land, John D. Boice
Author Affiliations +

Mammography screening is an accepted procedure for early detection of breast tumors among asymptomatic women. Since this procedure involves the use of X rays, it is itself potentially carcinogenic. Although there is general consensus about the benefit of screening for older women, screening practices differ between countries. In this paper radiation risks for these different practices are estimated using a new approach. We model breast cancer induction by ionizing radiation in a cohort of patients exposed to frequent X-ray examinations. The biologically based, mechanistic model provides a better foundation for the extrapolation of risks to different mammography screening practices than empirical models do. The model predicts that the excess relative risk (ERR) doubles when screening starts at age 40 instead of 50 and that a continuation of screening at ages 75 and higher carries little extra risk. The number of induced fatal breast cancers is estimated to be considerably lower than derived from epidemiological studies and from internationally accepted radiation protection risks. The present findings, if used in a risk-benefit analysis for mammography screening, would be more favorable to screening than estimates currently recommended for radiation protection. This has implications for the screening ages that are currently being reconsidered in several countries.

Harmen Bijwaard, Alina Brenner, Fieke Dekkers, Teun van Dillen, Charles E. Land, and John D. Boice "Breast Cancer Risk from Different Mammography Screening Practices," Radiation Research 174(3), 367-376, (28 June 2010).
Received: 3 November 2009; Accepted: 1 April 2010; Published: 28 June 2010
Get copyright permission
Back to Top