A recent publication by Carter et al. (2017) presents research on the effects of deferred rotation grazing and water provisioning on a suite of environmental variables
We detail issues that call into question the validity of the results and conclusions reported by the authors.
Data were not collected in a scientifically rigorous way.
Sufficient detail is not presented for the study to be replicated.
The authors do not adhere to standard statistical definitions or assumptions.
The study suffers from unaccounted for pseudoreplication.
The authors draw conclusions beyond the reasonable scope of inference.
How to translate text using browser tools
13 May 2019
Upland Water and Deferred Rotation Effects on Cattle Use in Riparian and Upland Areas – A Reply to Carter et al. 2017
Michael R. Guttery,
Danny Caudill
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
Rangelands
Vol. 41 • No. 2
April 2019
Vol. 41 • No. 2
April 2019
pseudoreplication
reproducible research
rotational grazing
scope of inference
statistical sampling
water provisioning