Translator Disclaimer
6 July 2020 The Larva and Advertisement Call of Bokermannohyla ahenea (Anura: Hylidae)
Michel V. Garey, Diogo B. Provete, Lilian S. Ouchi-Melo, Célio F.B. Haddad, Denise de C. Rossa-Feres
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Bokermannohyla ahenea is endemic to the Serra da Bocaina, a portion of the Serra do Mar in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. Little information is currently available about this species. Herein, we describe the larval morphology of B. ahenea, including internal oral features, chondrocranium, and hyobranchial apparatus, along with its advertisement call and natural history notes. This is the first description of the chondrocranium and hyobranchial apparatus for a member of the genus Bokermannohyla. The larval external morphology of B. ahenea is similar to those of other species of the B. circumdata group, but it can be distinguished from those of other species of the genus by its oral apparatus. The advertisement call of B. ahenea is complex with many numbers of notes. Also, spectral and temporal parameters of the advertisement call can be used to distinguish B. ahenea from its congeners.

INTRODUCTION

The genus Bokermannohyla Faivovich et al., 2005 was erected to accommodate the species formerly assigned to the Hyla circumdata, H. claresignata, H. martinsi, and H. pseudopseudis species groups (Faivovich et al., 2005). Currently, 32 species are assigned to this genus (Frost, 2018), divided into four groups: B. circumdata, B. claresignata, B. martinsi, and B. pseudopseudis (Faivovich et al., 2005, 2009). The monophyly of the B. circumdata group is currently based on molecular data, pending a comprehensive morphological study (Faivovich et al., 2009). In their analysis, Faivovich et al. (2009) found a close relationship among the genera Aplastodiscus Lutz, 1950, Bokermannohyla, Hyloscirtus Peters, 1882, Boana Gray, 1825 (as Hypsiboas), and Myersiohyla Faivovich et al., 2005 placing them in the tribe Cophomantini Faivovich et al., 2005. The diagnosis of Cophomantini (sensu Faivovich et al., 2005) included three larval character states: the increase in the number of labial tooth rows, a ventral oral disc, and complete marginal papillae. Furthermore, they also pointed out that the taxonomic distribution of at least two other larval character states within this tribe deserves further scrutiny: the presence of an anteromedial loop in the prenarial arena in the buccal roof of the oral cavity and the presence of fleshy projections of variable shape at the inner margins of nostrils of larvae (Faivovich et al., 2005). However, a comprehensive set of morphological characters is still lacking for most taxa included in Cophomantini.

The same topology of Faivovich et al. (2005) with small differences in node support was found in further studies (e.g., Pyron and Wiens, 2011; Pyron, 2014; Duellman et al., 2016), but other authors took strikingly different nomenclatural decisions. For example, among other changes, Duellman et al. (2016) elevated Cophomantini to the subfamily rank. This nomenclatural decision has been followed by Frost (2018). In a recent paper, Faivovich et al. (2018) continued treating Cophomantini as a tribe, arguing that Duellman et al. (2016) did not provide any commentary in support of their view. Nonetheless, the phylogenetic hypotheses available only included 6 of the 32 species currently assigned to Bokermannohyla, demonstrating the large Darwinian shortfall for Neotropical taxa that impairs comparative studies (Hortal et al., 2015).

Similarly, data on the advertisement call of some species within this tribe are lacking. Although not widely used in anuran phylogenetic analysis (e.g., Sullivan et al., 1996), the advertisement call is an important taxonomic tool to distinguish closely related species (Martins and Jim, 2003). The advertisement call of 23 species of Bokermmanohyla have been described (approximately 68%), which facilitates the use of acoustic traits to differentiate closely related species (e.g., Carvalho et al., 2013). However, the evolution of advertisement call traits within this genus have never been studied.

Bokermannohyla ahenea has been assigned to the B. circumdata species group, which currently comprehends 18 species (Frost, 2018). This species is only known from its type locality in the Serra da Bocaina, southeastern Brazil, and further information on natural history is lacking. Additionally, regarding its conservation status, this species is classified as Data Deficient according to IUCN (Napoli, 2006) and the Brazilian Red List of endangered species (Brasil, 2014). This status means that habitat use, occurrence pattern, and temporal and spatial variation in abundance of this species are poorly known. The endemism and absence of information about populational trends of B. ahenea (Napoli, 2006) emphasize the importance of obtaining these data in the field. Herein, we describe the external morphology, internal oral features, chondrocranium, and hyobranchial apparatus of the larva of B. ahenea based on specimens from the type locality. We also describe the advertisement call and provide novel natural history data, including calling site, larval diet, temporal distribution, and habitat use for both adults and larvae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

We carried out field work in the Serra da Bocaina National Park, São José do Barreiro, São Paulo, southeastern Brazil (22°45′5″S, 44°37′7″W, DATUM = SAD69; 1,550 m above sea level). The vegetation is typical of the Atlantic Rain Forest, with patches of highland grasslands. Samplings were conducted at 1,300–1,600 m in natural highland grasslands and high montane rainforest. A thorough description of the study area and a map showing the sampling sites is available elsewhere (Garey et al., 2014).

Sampling

We surveyed 16 sites, including ponds, marshes, and forest rivulets monthly between April 2008 and February 2010. Samplings were carried out both during the day for tadpoles and at night for adults. Larvae of Bokermannohyla ahenea were collected with hand dipnets by walking around the entire margin of water bodies. We surveyed the same breeding sites for calling males (Scott Jr. and Woodward, 1994). We walked around each breeding site to quantify the number of calling males and species composition. Larvae were fixed and preserved in 10% formalin in the field. We fixed adults in 10% formalin and preserved them in 70% ethanol. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Coleção DZSJRP-Amphibia, Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, São José do Rio Preto, and in the Coleção Célio F.B. Haddad (CFBH), Departamento de Zoologia, Rio Claro, both in the Universidade Estadual Paulista, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil (see Appendix). Voucher of the advertisement call is deposited in Fonoteca Neotropical Jacques Vielliard.

Description of the larva

The description of the external morphology is based on 13 larvae in stages 36–38 (Gosner, 1960) collected in the field. To confirm identification, larvae were reared in plastic vials in the laboratory with a mixture of water from the sampling sites and tap water, at room temperature, and under daylight regime. Larvae fed on commercial fish food and algae from the pond where they were collected. We compared tadpoles and newly metamorphosed individuals in stages 44–46 (DZSJRP 13920, 13947, 13949–50, 13955–7) with adults of B. ahenea (DZSJRP 12124–7) from the same locality. We followed Altig and McDiarmid (1999) for the total length (TOL), body length (BL), tail length (TL), tail musculature height (TMH), and oral disc diameter (OD) measurements. Additionally, we took the following measurements: maximum dorsal fin height (DFH, the maximum height of dorsal fin), maximum ventral fin height (VMH, the maximum height of the ventral fin), maximum nostril diameter (ND, the greatest diameter of the nostril), maximum spiracle length (SL, the longer border of the spiracle), maximum spiracle width (SW, the greatest portion of the spiracle width), maximum spiracle opening width (SOW, the widest diameter of the spiracle opening), interocular distance (IOD, the distance between the internal margin of the eyes), and internarial distance (IND, the distance between the internal margins of the nostrils), tail musculature width (TMW, the widest portion of the tail musculature), maximum body width (BW, the widest portion of the body), maximum body height (BH, the highest portion of the body), eye–snout distance (ESD, the distance between the anterior edge of the eye and the tip of the snout), nostril–snout distance (NSD, the distance between the anterior edge of the nostril and the tip of the snout), and eye diameter (ED, the greatest diameter of the eye). We took these measurements using a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ75) coupled to an ocular grid, except for TOL, which we measured with handheld digital calipers to the nearest 0.01 mm. We followed Lannoo (1987) to describe the lateral line system and Altig and McDiarmid (1999) for external morphology terminology.

For the description of internal oral morphology, we dissected five larvae in stages 28–38. Terminology follows Wassersug (1976). Specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy following the protocol of Provete (2016). For the description of chondrocranial morphology, we cleared and stained three specimens, one in stage 31 and two in 37 following Taylor and Van Dyke (1985). Terminology follows Haas (2003). Additional scanning electron microscopy images of the larval external morphology, chondrocranium, and internal oral features are available at MorphoBank (O'Leary and Kaufman, 2012), Project 2441 ( http://doi.org/10.7934/P2441).

The diet of larvae collected in the field was analyzed following Rossa-Feres et al. (2004). Briefly, we took a sample of the first centimeter of the gut of five larvae in stages 35–38 collected in January 2009 and identified algae to genus according to Bicudo and Menezes (2006). We did not quantify detritus or other fine organic matter ingested.

Advertisement call

We recorded vocalizations with a Marantz PMD222 coupled to a semi-directional Sennheiser K6 + ME 66 microphone. We recorded the advertisement call of six male Bokermannohyla ahenea (21 ± 24 calls per individual) at a minimum distance of 50 cm (FNJV 37788). Calls were digitized and analyzed with Raven Pro 1.4 (Bioacoustics Research Program, 2011), with sampling frequency of 44.1 kHz, 16 bits of resolution, and mono channel. Frequency measurements were made with Fast Fourier Transformation with 512 points, 90% overlap, and Hamming windows. Sound was analyzed with 50% brightness and 50% contrast. Audiospectrogram and sonogram were prepared using seewave R package (Sueur et al., 2008). Air temperature was measured with a mercury thermometer to the nearest 0.5°C.

Table 1.

Measurements of larvae of Bokermannohyla ahenea in stages 36–38. Data are in millimeters and presented as mean ± SD (range). See text for abbreviations.

img-z3-10_01.gif

We measured 11 call parameters, of which three were spectral—maximum frequency (Hz), minimum frequency (Hz), and dominant frequency (Hz)—and eight were temporal—call length (s), number of notes per call, note length (s), pulse number per call, pulse number per note, interval between notes (s), call rate (calls/min), and pulse rate (pulses/s). The definition of advertisement call, pulse, and note followed Toledo and Haddad (2005). Measurements followed Cocroft and Ryan (1995). We considered the number of pulses as a temporal variable because it was correlated with call duration. Data are presented as mean ± SD (range, sample size). To test for differences between notes, we used Student's t-test. Residuals were tested for normality and variance homogeneity.

RESULTS

External larval morphology

In Gosner larval stage 37, body ovoid in dorsal view (with the anterior region narrower than the posterior region), depressed in lateral view (BH/BW = 0.75–0.78 in stage 37 [n = 9]; Table 1; Fig. 1A–B). Snout rounded in dorsal and lateral views. Eyes dorsal, oriented dorsolaterally. Nostrils elliptical with a small fleshy projection on inner marginal rim, positioned dorsally, located almost equidistant between eye and snout (NSD/END = 0.91–1.4 in stage 37 [n = 9]), directed dorsolaterally. Intestine visible, centered, arranged spirally. Spiracle single, sinistral, aperture directed posteriorly, inner wall attached to the body. Vent tube dextral, slightly longer than wide (length/width = 1.14, in stage 37 [n = 9]), inner wall attached to ventral fin. All lateral lines evident in preserved specimens; 38 neuromasts in dorsal line, 66 in middle body line, ca. 43 in fused supraorbital and infraorbital lines, 8 in posterior infraorbital, and 2 in posterior supraorbital. Ventral line with 40 neuromasts, interrupted at base of spiracle, descending to ventral region, continuing to spiracle opening and vent tube. Circular cumulus of stitches present on abdominal surface near base of vent tube. Angular lines surround venter, almost fused, with 24 neuromasts. Middle and dorsal lines fused on posterior third of tail. Medial line extending to tail tip, distance between stiches increasing on posterior third. Longitudinal oral line with 9 neuromasts, anterior oral line with 12 neuromasts. Anterior oral line initiating lateral to oral disc, ascending to near the nostrils, descending to ventral region, terminating in branchial region, comprising 16 neuromasts. A small ventrolateral stitch and a whitish set of stitches also present near end of ventral line (Fig. 1A). Tail long (TL/TOL = 0.62–0.65 in stage 37 [n = 9]). Dorsal fin originating at body-tail junction, its contour parallel to longitudinal axis of tail musculature. Maximum height of dorsal fin at posterior third of tail where tail muscle becomes thin. Ventral fin low, its contour parallel to longitudinal axis of tail musculature. Tail musculature wide in dorsal view (TMW/BW = 0.4–0.42 in stage 37 [n = 9]), high in lateral view (TMH/BH = 0.58–0.62 in stage 37 [n = 9]), gradually tapering towards pointed tail tip.

Oral disc ventral (OD/BW = 0.27–0.32 in stage 37 [n = 9]) with two posterior emarginations (Fig. 1C). Marginal papillae conical, arranged in single row, alternating posteriorly and anteriorly, with a narrow anterior gap (about 12.3% of oral disc width). Papillae unpigmented, their density varying from 8–16 papillae per linear millimeter. Submarginal papillae present in some specimens (see Variation). Labial tooth row formula (LTRF) 2(2)/3(1), A-1 and A-2 with same length, P-2 slightly longer than P-1, P-3 slightly shorter than P-1 and P-2. Labial teeth slightly curved on outer edges, ca. 60 labial teeth/mm (estimated on A-1). Anterior jaw sheath arched, posterior jaw sheath V-shaped, both keratinized and finely serrated, ca. 34 serrations/mm on anterior jaw; serrations conical.

Figure 1.

Larva of Bokermannohyla ahenea (DZSJRP 2496) in stage 37. (A) Dorsal and (B) lateral views, and (C) oral apparatus.

img-z4-4_01.jpg

Intraspecific variation

Submarginal papillae were present in 14 (8.5%) out of the 165 tadpoles analyzed, six (3.6%) had only one papilla laterally to P1, either on the left or right side, and only one tadpole had a row with nine submarginal papillae lateral to the posterior teeth rows. The remaining tadpoles had either two papillae on each side of P1 (1.8%), or anteriorly and posteriorly to the left side of P1 (1.2%), or six papillae on the left side of the posterior teeth rows. Most specimens of Bokermannohyla ahenea had abnormal asymmetric oral apparatus, such as dekeratinized mandibles and absent or fragmented teeth rows.

The inner wall of the spiracle varies from a slight ridge to completely free from body. This variation is independent of the developmental stage. The ratio between body height and body width varies ontogenetically, from 0.75–0.76 (n = 2) in stage 36 to 0.79–0.83 in stage 38 (n = 2). TL/TOL varies from 0.6–0.71 in stage 36 (n = 2) and 0.62–0.64 in stage 38 (n = 2). TMH/BH is 0.63 in stage 36 (n = 2) and ranges from 0.52–0.55 in stage 38 (n = 2). The ratio OD/BW varies from 0.29–0.33 in stage 36 (n = 2) and from 0.30–0.34 in stage 38 (n = 2).

Larval coloration

Live larvae have a brown body with a light brown area around nostrils. The tip of the spiracle lacks pigmentation. The tail is orange. The dorsal margin of the tail musculature is reddish. The tail musculature has a pair of longitudinal dark brown stripes on the dorsal margin. There are many melanophores distributed longitudinally on the skin over the caudal musculature, with higher density on its first half. Also, some individuals present a dark mark over the axis between dorsal and ventral myomers on the anterior portion of the tail (Fig. 1B). The fins are transparent with a few small melanophores. The venter is light orange. The first third of the tail musculature has a dark bar between the upper and lower myomers that can be seen in lateral view (Fig. 1B). The iris is orange and the pupil is black. In formalin, the body turns yellowish and the tail musculature turns beige. The iris is black and pupil is white. Digital images of live larvae are available at MorphoBank (O'Leary and Kaufman, 2012), Project 2441 ( http://doi.org/10.7934/P2441).

Internal oral anatomy

Buccal floor hexagonal (Fig. 2A), wider than long. Two pairs of multiple-branching infralabial papillae: anterior pair small with four short projections, posterior pair large with several long projections. A pair of long, conical lingual papillae with pustulations at their base (Fig. 3A). Buccal floor arena (BFA) triangular, surrounded by ca. 35 conical papillae arranged in a V pattern, largest papillae bifurcated, positioned medially. Approximately 12 small papillae diverging obliquely and laterally from BFA. Approximately 10–14 small prepocket papillae, along with scattered pustulations. Approximately 120 pustulations on BFA, more concentrated posteriorly. Buccal pockets deep, oriented transversally, width twice length. Free velar surface broad with secretory pits arranged in parallel stripes between spiculae. Secretory pits absent on median notch. Posterior margin with three projections over filter cavities on each side. Spicular support distinct, spiculae thin and long. Median notch without projections, partially covering glottis, which is thick with broad lips.

Buccal roof rectangular (Fig. 2B), about 1.5 times longer than wide. Nostrils at 25% of distance from mouth to esophagus; median ridge at 40% of distance from mouth to esophagus (Fig. 2B). Prenarial arena with anteromedial loop forming inverted arch (Fig. 3B). Nostrils almost four times longer than wide. Elliptical vacuities anterior to nostrils distinct with a smooth concave bottom. Vacuities shallow. Anterior wall thick and serrated (Fig. 3B). Posterior wall thin with three thin papillae on each side. Nostrils oriented ca. 50° from transverse plane. Narial valve short. Two pairs of postnarial papillae, medial pair smaller than lateral pair. Median ridge triangular with three short papillae on margin. Lateral ridge papillae triangular with serrated margins. Buccal Roof Arena (BRA) rectangular, lacking papillae. Pustulations evenly distributed over BRA. Approximately 10 short, conical, lateral roof papillae, all similarly sized. Dorsal velum papillate, discontinuous at midline. Secretory pits small, distributed all along the dorsal velum but more concentrated anteriorly.

Chondrocranium and hyobranchial apparatus

Neurocranium slightly longer than wide (width/length = 0.86), depressed (height/width = 0.33), greatest width at the posterior portion of the palatoquadrate. Cartilago labialis superior with V-shaped pars corporis articulating syndesmodically with pars alaris anteriorly, fused posteriorly (Fig. 4A). Partes alaris of cartilago labialis superior broad, slightly rounded ventrally, bearing distinct processus posterior dorsalis that tapers conically. Lower jaw composed of paired, syndesmodically connected cartilago labialis inferior and L-shaped cartilagines Meckeli, with a distinct, downcurved processus retroarticularis. Cornua trabeculae uniformly wide, relatively short (ca. 25% of neurocranium length), with ventrally curved tips; septum nasi present in lamina orbitonasalis. Tectum nasi slightly curved, wide. Foramina olfactorium present. Cornua trabeculae lack processus lateralis. Cartilago orbitalis is thin plate of cartilage surrounding rounded cavum cranii. Cavum cranii delimited posteriorly by tectum parietale, which is confluent and fused with tectum synoticum in tadpoles in stage 37. Foramina carotica primaria and craneopalatina posterolateral. Otic capsule diamond-shaped, ca. 23% of chondrocranial length. Each capsule with short, thin processus anterolateralis with elliptical fenestra ovalis ventral to otic capsule.

Figure 2.

Internal oral features of larvae of Bokermannohyla ahenea in stage 28 (DZSJRP 1918.21). (A) Buccal roof and (B) buccal floor. Scale bars = 500 µm.

img-z6-1_01.jpg

Figure 3.

Details of the internal oral features of the Bokermannohyla ahenea in stage 28 (DZSJRP 1918.2). (A) Infralabial and lingual papillae in the buccal roof and (B) internal nostrils and median ridge in the buccal floor. Scale bars = 100 µm.

img-z6-3_01.jpg

Palatoquadrate connected anteriorly to neurocranium by broad commissura quadratocranialis and posteriorly by thin processus ascendens with low attachment to neurocranium (Fig. 4B–C), immediately below foramen oculomotorium in posteroventral portion of otic capsules. Pars articularis quadrati articulated anteriorly with cartilagines Meckeli. Processus antorbitalis of lamina orbitonasalis short, broad. Processus muscularis quadrati triangular, broad. Tip of processus muscularis quadrati fastened to processus antorbitalis by ligamentous connection. Posteriorly, one foramen jugulare well defined. Notochordal canal closed anteriorly.

Figure 4.

Larval chondrocranium of Bokermannohyla ahenea in stage 34 (DZSJRP 2494.1). (A) frontal view of the cartilago labialis superior; (B) dorsal, (C) ventral, and (D) lateral views of the chondrocranium; (E) ventral view of the hyobranchial apparatus. Legends in (B) and (C): as, arcus subocularis; cc, cavum cranii; cli, cartilago labialis inferior; cls, cartilago labialis superior; cm, cartilago Meckeli; ca, cartilago orbitalis; ct, cornua trabeculae; fc, foramen craneopalatinum; fcp, foramen caroticum primarium; fj, foramen jugulare; nc, notochordal canal; oc, otic capsule; pa, processus ascendens; pal, processus anterolateralis hyalis; pao, processus antorbitalis; paq, processus articularis quadrati; pm, processus muscularis quadrati; pra, processus retroarticularis; sf, fenestra subocularis; tn, tectum nasi; tp, tectum parietale. Legends in (D): fo, foramen opticum; fpo, fissura prootica; fom, foramen oculomotorium; fov, fenestra ovalis; pa, pars alaris; pc, pars corporis; pm, processus muscularis; pal, processus anterolateralis hyalis. Legends in (E): ca, condylus articularis; cb, ceratobranchiales; cp+cu, copula posterior and processus urobranchialis; h, hypobranchiales; pa, processus anterior hyalis; pab, processus anterior branchialis; pal, processus anterolateralis hyalis; pp, processus posterior dorsalis; pr, pars reunens; s, spiculae; tc, commissura terminalis.

img-z7-1_01.jpg

Hyobranchial skeleton composed of paired ceratohyalia articulated medially via a square pars reuniens, planum hypobranchiale, and four ceratobranchialia (Fig. 4D). Basihyal absent. Ceratohyalia with large processus anterioris and small processus anterolateralis hyalis. Basibranchial articulated ventrally with planum hypobranchialis, possessing tiny, pointed processus urobranchialis. Ceratobranchialia connected posteriorly by commissurae terminales. Processus anterior branchialis above ceratobranchialis I. Spiculae I–III present, associated with ceratobranchialia I–III.

Figure 5.

(A) Audiospectrogram and (B) oscillogram of the advertisement call of Bokermannohyla ahenea (CFBH 28797) recorded at the Serra da Bocaina National Park, São José do Barreiro, São Paulo, Brazil on August 20, 2008. Air temperature 13.5°C.

img-z8-4_01.jpg

Advertisement call

The advertisement call is composed of two types of multipulsed notes emitted sequentially (A and B; Fig. 5), usually varying from 3–4 notes per call. However, more than 10 notes are rarely emitted in a single call (5.24 ± 7.07, n = 32). Note A can be either multipulsed or not, while note B is always multipulsed. The maximum frequency of note A is 1,316.7–2,017.1 Hz (1,736.6 ± 156, n = 72), minimum frequency is 392.2– 889.1 Hz (668.6 ± 175.6, n = 72), and dominant frequency is 1,033.6–1,679.6 Hz (1,368.8 ± 214.1, n = 72). The duration of note A is 0.10–0.39 s (0.20 ± 0.07, n = 72), pulse number is 1–38 pulses/note (22.12 ± 5.40, n = 72), and pulse rate is 0.05–0.28 pulses/s (0.12 ± 0.04, n = 72). The maximum frequency of note B is 1,386.8–2,009.4 Hz (1,696.14 ± 143.27, n = 55), minimum frequency is 409–871.3 Hz (654.67 ± 178.86, n = 55), and dominant frequency is 861.3–1,636.5 Hz (1,360.92 ± 191.45, n = 55). The duration of note B is 0.20–0.78 s (0.42 ± 0.13, n = 55), pulse number is 11–44 pulses/note (25.98 ± 5.51, n = 55), and pulse rate is 0.04–0.11 pulses/s (0.07 ± 0.02, n = 55). Note A initially increases in pulse intensity and then stabilizes, whereas note B has a clear decrease in pulse intensity. Notes A and B do not differ in maximum (t125 = 1.50; P = 0.13), minimum (t125 = 0.44; P = 0.66), or dominant frequency (t125 = 0.20; P = 0.84). However, note B is longer (t125 = 12.21; P = 0.0001) and has a higher number of pulses (t125 = 3.88; P = 0.0002) and lower pulse rate (t125 = 9.54; P = 0.0001) than note A. Despite the overlapping in the raw data, the confidence intervals between notes A and B did not overlap because note A is commonly emitted with a lower number of pulses than note B.

In general, call duration is 0.15–6.83 s (1.68 ± 1.18, n = 32), with 56–263 pulses per call (95.09 ± 40.37, n = 32). Calls are usually composed of two or three A notes followed by one or more B notes, with the most frequent sequence being AAB, AABB, or AAAB. Note interval between AA is 0.12–0.22 s (0.18 ± 0.02, n = 40), between AB from 0.12–0.21 s (0.18 ± 0.02, n = 32), and between BB from 0.17–0.28 s (0.22 ± 0.03, n = 23). The note interval between BB is longer than AA and AB (F2,92 = 22.21; P = 0.0001). Calls are emitted at a rate of 8.10–19.69 calls/minute (13.72 ± 3.64, n = 6).

Natural history

Tadpoles occured year-round, mainly in shallow marshes with slow-flowing waters and in rivulets and narrow forest streams. Considering all sampled water bodies, the peak of tadpole abundance was in July (Fig. 6), but they were highly abundant year-round. Potential predators that co-occured with larvae nclude the heteropterans Belostoma sp., Ranatra segrega Montandon, 1905, R. travassosi De Carlo, 1950, Notonecta polystolisma Fieber, 1851, and Sigara sp., the coleopterans Tropisternus sp., Megadytes sp., Cybister sp., Copelatus sp., Hydrocanthus sp., and Gyrinus sp., and the odonates Erythemis sp. and Aeshna sp. Larvae of Rhinella icterica (Spix, 1824), Aplastodiscus perviridis Lutz, 1950, Dendropsophus minutus (Peters, 1872), Scinax sp. (aff. duartei), S. hayii (Barbour, 1909), Boana bandeirantes (Caramaschi and Cruz, 2013), Leptodactylus furnarius Sazima and Bokermann, 1978, Physalaemus barrioi Bokermann, 1967a, and Proceratophrys melanopogon (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926) co-occured with larvae of Bokermannohyla ahenea. The bottoms of marshes and streams were often composed of clay, sand, and fine gravel. The most abundant items in the larval diet were Dynophyceae, Trachelomonas, and Phormidium, while fragments of arthropods, coarse particulate organic matter, fungi hyphae, algae of the genera Cosmarium, Chlorococcum, Oedogonium, Oocystis, Lepocincles, Phacus, and Spirulina were less abundant.

Figure 6.

Temporal variation in the abundance of calling males and tadpoles of Bokermannohyla ahenea at the Serra da Bocaina National Park, São José do Barreiro, São Paulo, Brazil.

img-z9-9_01.jpg

Males called while perched on herbaceous vegetation (height 156 ± 31 cm) at night along the margin of first and second order streams, mainly in forest fragments amidst highland grasslands above 1,500 m above sea level. Calling activity took place between November and February, and the peak of abundance was in January (Fig. 6). We found adults of Bokermannohyla ahenea at the type locality, Campo de Fruticultura (nowadays called Fazenda Ponte Alta), within the National Park. However, the species also occurs in other forest patches in private properties outside the Park. Adults of Aplastodiscus perviridis, Physalaemus barrioi, and Scinax squalirostris (Lutz, 1925) co-occurred with adults of B. ahenea during calling activity.

DISCUSSION

The tadpoles of most species Bokermannohyla have been described (23 of 32 species, or 72%; Provete et al., 2012; Magalhães et al., 2015; Pezzuti et al., 2015). There is striking variation in larval morphology among species groups of the genus (Table 2). However, information about internal oral features is scarce, and their larval chondrocranium is unknown. Larvae of the genus Bokermannohyla are all exotrophic and occur in both lentic and lotic habitats. Most are benthic and, among those, species of the B. claresignata group belong to the suctorial guild (Altig and Johnston, 1989). The oral apparatus is ventral and lateroposteriorly emarginated, except for the B. claresignata group, in which it lacks emargination. The marginal papillae row can be either uni- or bisseriate and includes a short gap anteriorly in all larvae of all Bokermannohyla species except B. hylax, B. clepsydra, B. claresignata, B. itapoty, B. martinsi, B. pseudopseudis, and B. saxicola, which have a continuous row of marginal papillae (Table 2). In the B. circumdata group, B. carvalhoi and B. capra have a biseriate row of papillae on the anterior labium and uniseriate row on the posterior labium (Peixoto, 1981; Mercês et al., 2012). Bokermannohyla ahenea and B. vulcaniae share a uniseriate row of papillae on the anterior labium and alternated on the posterior one (this study; Gaiga et al., 2013). Submarginal papillae are rare in tadpoles of the genus (Pezzuti et al., 2015) but may occur in low density.

Table 2.

Main external morphological characteristics of known larvae of the genus Bokermannohyla. See text for abbreviations.

img-AI3q_01.gif

The other species of Bokermannohyla that occurred in the study area was B. circumdata, which was very rare and never found in the same stream where we collected B. ahenea tadpoles. Its tadpole (Mongin and Carvalho-e-Silva, 2013) can be differentiated from B. ahenea by its body shape in dorsal view, size of marginal rims of nostril, and number of marginal papillae. Bokermannohyla circumdata has an elliptical body, nostrils with large marginal rims, and two marginal papillae rows. Conversely, B. ahenea has an ovoid body, nostrils with small marginal rims, and one marginal papillae row, with alternated papillae.

The larva of Bokermannohyla ahenea can be readily distinguished from those of the B. claresignata species group (Lutz and Orton, 1946; Bokermann, 1972), which have a suctorial oral apparatus without emargination, LTRF 7(7)-8(8)/12-13(1), 9(9)/14(1), continuous marginal papillae, and submarginal papillae laterally on the anterior labium, some with labial teeth. Tadpoles of B. martinsi have LTRF 3(3)/5-6(1) and no submarginal papillae according to Leite and Eterovick (2010); however, in their drawing it is possible to see a few submarginal papillae in the lateral portion of the oral disc, as noted by Pezzuti et al. (2015). These characteristics easily distinguish them from B. ahenea. All larvae of the B. pseudopseudis species group are lotic, benthic, and their LTRF is typically 2(1,2)-3(3)/4(1)-5(1)-6(1)-7(1)-8(1) (Cardoso, 1983; Sazima and Bokermann, 1977; Eterovick and Brandão, 2001; Lugli and Haddad, 2006a, b; Magalhães et al., 2015), which is distinct from the 2(2)/3(1) labial teeth row formula of B. ahenea. The submarginal papillae of B. pseudopseudis species group are arranged either in 1–4 rows antero-laterally or only one row around the whole oral disc (Sazima and Bokermann, 1977; Eterovick and Brandão, 2001; Lugli and Haddad, 2006a, b; Magalhães et al., 2015), while those of B. ahenea are scattered and may or may not form a row.

In general, species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group have a distinct lateral line system, as in B. ahenea. Some species of the B. pseudopseudis and B. martinsi groups also show an evident lateral line system (e.g., Lugli and Haddad, 2006a, b; Leite and Eterovick, 2010). The number and distribution of lateral lines vary among species groups. All lateral lines of B. ahenea are evident, as they are in B. caramaschii, B. diamantina (Pezzuti et al., 2015), and B. oxente (Lugli and Haddad, 2006a), whereas other species have fewer lines (e.g., B. carvalhoi and B. ibitipoca), and no lateral lines are visible in B. luctuosa (Pombal and Haddad, 1993). An interesting pattern is that tadpoles of B. ahenea have a pair of circular cumuli of neuromasts on the base of the vent tube. These cumuli occur also in B. capra, B. caramaschii, B. carvalhoi, B. diamantina, B. lucianae, B. nanuzae, B. martinsi, and B. saxicola (Mercês et al., 2015; Pezzuti et al., 2015, Walker et al., 2015) and in larvae of Boana, Aplastodiscus (Kolenc et al., 2008), and Hyloscirtus (Sánchez, 2010). It is important to assess the distribution of these cumuli of stitches in other genera to test if it is correlated with ecomorphological guilds (Kolenc et al., 2008), or even if there is a phylogenetic component in this characteristic, or if it is restricted to Cophomantini.

All known larvae of Bokermannohyla have 20–40 BFA papillae per side and 4–7 prepocket papillae; 2 lingual papillae (except B. luctuosa, which has 3); buccal pockets narrow, deep, and transversally oriented; ventral velum wide with irregular posterior margin, spicular support weak, distinct median notch; presence of vacuities anterior to nostrils; 2–3 postnarial papillae arranged in a Λ-pattern, with the antero-medial papilla larger than the others; median ridge triangular; and presence of lateral ridge papillae either as complex hand-like or with few, small secondary projections (d'Heursel and Haddad, 2007; Magalhães et al., 2015; Pezzuti et al., 2015). Most species of Bokermannohyla share a pair of large infralabial papillae anteriorly, with secondary, digitiform projections and another smaller posterior pair of conical papillae (d'Heursel and Haddad, 2007; this study). The tadpoles of B. circumdata (Mongin and Carvalho-e-Silva, 2013), B. flavopicta, B. oxente (Magalhães et al., 2015), and B. caramaschii (Pezzuti et al., 2015) are unique in having five, four, and three pairs of infralabial, multiple-branching papillae, respectively—more than the remaining species of the genus. Short papillae occur posteriorly to the BRA in B. nanuzae (d'Heursel and Haddad, 2007) and B. diamantina (Pezzuti et al., 2015) and are lacking in all species of the B. pseudopseudis group (d'Heursel and Haddad, 2007; Magalhães et al., 2015). The prenarial arena of species in the B. pseudopseudis group has an anteroposterior ridge (d'Heursel and Haddad, 2007), which is lacking in most larvae of the B. circumdata group. Instead, larvae of the B. circumdata group have 2–3 large papillae in that arena (d'Heursel and Haddad, 2007; Mongin and Carvalho-e-Silva, 2013; Pezzuti et al., 2015). However, the prenarial arena of B. ahenea has an anteromedial loop, making it more similar to species of the B. pseudopseudis group. However, this character seems to be very plastic (see Pezzuti et al., 2015) and deserves further investigation to distinguish between these two states.

To our knowledge, this is the first description of the larval chondrocranium of a species of Bokermannohyla. Data on the larval chondrocranium for Cophomantini are scarce and available only for Boana riojana (Koslowsky, 1895) (Lavilla and Fabrezi, 1987), B. lanciformis (Cope, 1871) (de Sá, 1988), B. semilineata (Spix, 1824), B. geographica (Spix, 1824) (d'Heursel and de Sá, 1999), B. raniceps (Cope, 1862) (Alcalde and Rosset, 2003), and B. rosenbergi (Boulenger, 1898) (Haas, 1996; Vera Candioti, 2007). There are also few data available on certain character states of the chondrocranium of Aplastodiscus perviridis and Boana cordobae (Barrio, 1965) that were used to infer a phylogeny for Anura (Haas, 2003), and also Hyloscirtus armatus (Boulenger, 1902) (Haas and Richards, 1998), but without detailed illustrations and a comprehensive description. Thus, we could not readily compare the chondrocranial morphology of these species to that of B. ahenea. Within Cophomantini, the larvae of Hyloscirtus are rheophilous and have a highly modified chondrocranium. For example, in H. armatus the pars corporea and alaris of the cartilago labialis superior are fully fused and the cornua trabeculae are extended anteriorly and fused medially (Haas and Richards, 1998), whereas the pars corporea and alaris of the cartilago labialis superior are bound anteriorly syndesmodically and fused posteriorly and the cornua trabeculae of B. ahenea are longer and thinner. All these features are shared by other distantly related species with rheophilous larvae, such as Ranoidea nannotis (Andersson, 1916) (Haas and Richards, 1998), suggesting that these characteristics could be convergent.

The processus anterolateralis in Bokermannohyla ahenea is thin and short, similar to that of Boana geographica (d'Heursel and de Sá, 1999), B. raniceps (Alcalde and Rosset, 2003), and B. rosenbergi (Vera Candioti, 2007), whereas in B. lanciformis it is longer and broader (de Sá, 1988). However, the length of this process varies ontogenetically (de Sá, 1988). Additionally, the tectal roofing of B. lanciformis bears the taenia tecti transversalis and medialis projecting from tectum synoticum (de Sá, 1988), whereas a continuous tectum parietale is found in B. ahenea, like that of B. geographica and B. semilineata (d'Heursel and de Sá, 1999). The tectum synoticum of Boana is thinner than in B. ahenea, which covers about one third of the chondrocranium, but these cartilages also change throughout ontogeny (Haas, 2003). The foramen opticum of B. ahenea is also much smaller than that of Boana (Lavilla and Fabrezi, 1987; de Sá, 1988; d'Heursel and de Sá, 1999; Alcalde and Rosset, 2003; Vera Candioti, 2007). Like other hylids (Haas, 2003), the tip of the processus muscularis quadrati of B. ahenea is fastened to the processus antorbitalis by a thin ligamentous connection. The hyobranchial apparatus of B. ahenea is overall similar to that of most Boana species, except for the absence of the basihyal (also absent in B. rosenbergi) and the shape of the processus anterior branchialis, which is pointed in B. ahenea, but broader in B. riojoana or very reduced in B. rosenbergi. The cartilago labialis superior is fused posteriorly in B. ahenea, similarly to B. lanciformis (de Sá, 1988). This character state is uncommon in Cophomantini, since the pars corporis and alaris are not fused in most species. However, it is not known if there is an ontogenetic variation in this structure or how common it is in other genera within the tribe.

The advertisement calls of species of the genus Bokermannohyla have a wide variation, but most species (10 species, ca. 45%) have two types of multipulsed notes without harmonic structure (ca. 79%). However, sidebands cannot be ruled out, mainly in old descriptions. Approximately 50% of the species of the genus Bokermannohyla emit two or more notes per call. About 71% of the species have multipulsed calls. However, the remaining spectral and temporal parameters are extremely variable and further experimental studies are needed to test the function of multiple notes.

Spectral and temporal parameters of the advertisement call can be used to distinguish Bokermannohyla ahenea from its congeners (Table 3). For example, the presence of harmonics in the advertisement call is uncommon in Bokermannohyla. However, harmonics occur in the call of at least one species of each group (sensu Faivovich et al., 2005). Specifically, the advertisement call of B. ahenea differs from those of seven species (B. circumdata, B. juiju Favovich et al., 2009, B. luctuosa, B. napolii Carvalho et al., 2012, B. pseudopseudis, B. sapiranga Brandão et al., 2012, and B. saxicola) by the absence of a harmonic structure (Eterovick and Brandão, 2001; Carvalho et al., 2012, 2013; Taucce et al., 2015). The call of B. ahenea can be readily distinguished from those of B. carvalhoi, B. ibitiguara, B. ibitipoca, B. nanuzae, and B. sazimai by the lower dominant frequency (Napoli and Caramaschi, 2004; Carvalho et al., 2012; Nali and Prado, 2014; Walker et al., 2015), which is greater than that of B. diamantina, B. hylax, B. luctuosa, B. napolii, B. pseudopseudis, and B. sapiranga (Napoli and Caramaschi, 2004; Napoli and Juncá, 2006; Carvalho et al., 2012, 2013). Yet, the advertisement call of B. ahenea differs from those of B. capra, B. carvalhoi, B. diamantina, B. hylax, B. itapoty, B. juiju, B. pseudopseudis, B. sapiranga, and B. saxicola by the higher number of note types per call (Eterovick and Brandão, 2001; Lugli and Haddad, 2006b; Napoli and Juncá, 2006; Carvalho et al., 2012, 2013; Taucce et al., 2015), and from that of B. capra by the lower number of note types per call (Napoli and Pimenta, 2009). The call of B. ahenea differs from that of B. flavopicta by pulse presence (Rocha et al., 2016) and is different from those of B. astartea (Bokermann, 1967b), B. lucianae, B. martinsi, and B. vulcaniae by the higher number of pulses per call (Heyer et al., 1990; Napoli and Pimenta, 2003; Gaiga et al., 2013; Pinheiro et al., 2014). Finally, it differs from the advertisement calls of B. astartea, B. flavopicta, and B. oxente by its longer note duration (Heyer et al., 1990; Lugli and Haddad, 2006a; Rocha et al., 2016).

Table 3.

Call features of members of the genus Bokermannohyla. Cdur = call duration (s); Knot = kinds of note; Nnot = number of notes per call; Ndur = note duration (ms); Nhar = number of harmonics; Npuls = pulses per call; Prat = pulse rate (pulse/s); Fdom = dominant frequency (Hz).

img-z13-1_01.gif

The advertisement call of Bokermannohyla ahenea comprises more than one type of note, but the social function of the different types of note is unknown. For example, the advertisement call of B. ibitiguara has two parts: one with a territorial function and the other used to attract females (Nali and Prado, 2014). This is possibly also the case for B. ahenea. In general, species of the genus Bokermannohyla have a complex advertisement call, and future studies should assess whether different notes have different functions.

Our results provide valuable data for future studies on bioacoustics and phylogenetic comparative studies to investigate the evolution of call features. The information provided about larvae of Bokermannohyla is also key to support taxonomic, phylogenetic (e.g., Haas, 2003), and ecological studies (e.g., Strauβ et al., 2010). Our results can certainly help in the taxonomy of the genus, since Bokermannohyla still lacks diagnostic morphological characters. For example, the same whitish structure at the base of vent tube has been recorded in Boana and also seems to be present not only in B. ahenea, but in other members of Bokermannohyla from either lentic or lotic habitats. However, its function is not clearly understood and deserves further studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ICMBio/RAN provided collecting permits (14474-1, 14861-1, and 16461-1). The staff of the Serra da Bocaina National Park provided logistical support and housing. R. Soleman made the line drawings of the larva and chondrocranium. C. Canedo, L.B. Crivelari, A. Juarez, L.B. Nascimento, M.R.C. Martins, I.A. Martins, T.A. Silva, and L.F. Ugioni helped in the field work. T.O. Santos assisted with the SEM analysis carried out in the LAMMAR at the Federal University of Goiás. T. Pezzuti helped us improve the lateral line description. A. d'Heursel helped with details of internal oral features. L. Alcalde helped with chondrocranium description. D. Dias identified the items in tadpole's diet. Three anonymous reviewers provided useful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. DBP received master's and post-doctoral fellowships from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; #2008/55744-6, 2016/13949-7) and a CAPES-DS doctoral fellowship. MVG was supported by CNPq (#422537/2016-0) and UNILA (editais PRPPG 110/2018 and 80/2019) and received a doctoral fellowship from FAPESP (#2008/50575-1). LSOM received master's and doctoral fellowships from FAPESP (#2012/09243-0, #2013/26101-8) and CNPq (370419/2011-1). LSOM has a posdoc fellowship from Fundação Parque Tecnológico Itaipu-BR (concessão № 902443/2019). CFBH received grants from FAPESP (#2008/50928-1, #2013/50741-7) and CNPq (302518/2013-4). DCRF was supported by a joint CNPq/FAPESP project (#563075/2010-4 and #2010/52321-7) on Brazilian anuran larvae biology. DCRF thanks CNPq for the research fellowship (303522/2013-5).

REFERENCES

1.

Alcalde L., Rosset S.D. 2003. Descripción y comparación del condrocráneo en larvas de Hyla raniceps (Cope, 1862), Scinax granulatus (Peters, 1871) y Scinax squalirostris (A. Lutz, 1925) (Anura: Hylidae). Cuadernos de Herpetología 17:35–51. Google Scholar

2.

Altig R., Johnston G.F. 1989. Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies, and habitats. Herpetological Monographs 3:81–109.  DOI  Google Scholar

3.

Altig R., McDiarmid R.W. 1999. Body plan: development and morphology. Pp. 24–51, in McDiarmid R.W., Altig R. (Eds.), Tadpoles, the Biology of Anuran Larvae. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

4.

Andersson L.G. 1916. Results of Dr. E. Mjöberg's Swedish scientific expeditions to Australia 1910–1913. IX. Batrachians from Queensland. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 52:1–20. Google Scholar

5.

Barbour T. 1909. Some new South American cold-blooded vertebrates. Proceedings of the New England Zoölogical Club 4:47–52.  DOI  Google Scholar

6.

Barrio A. 1965. La subespecies de Hyla pulchella Duméril y Bibron (Anura, Hylidae). Physis 25:115–128. Google Scholar

7.

Bertoluci J., Xavier V., Cassimiro J. 2003. Description of the tadpole of Hyla hylax Heyer, 1985 (Anura, Hylidae) with notes on its ecology. Amphibia-Reptilia 24:509–514.  DOI  Google Scholar

8.

Bicudo C.E.D.M., Menezes M. 2006. Gêneros de algas de águas continentais do Brasil. Rima, São Carlos. Google Scholar

9.

Bioacoustics Research Program. 2011. Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software, Version 1.4. Available from:  http://ravensoundsoftware.comGoogle Scholar

10.

Bokermann W.C.A. 1956. Sôbre uma espécie de Hyla do estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil (Amphibia, Salientia, Hylidae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 12:357–362. Google Scholar

11.

Bokermann W.C.A. 1964. Dos nuevas especies de Hyla de Minas Gerais y notas sobre Hyla alvarengai Bok. (Amphibia, Salientia, Hylidae). Neotropica 10:67–76. Google Scholar

12.

Bokermann W.C.A. 1967a. Três novas especies de Physalaemus do sudeste brasileiro (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 27:135–143. Google Scholar

13.

Bokermann W.C.A. 1967b. Hyla astartea, nova espécie da Serra do Mar em São Paulo (Amphibia, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 27:157–158. Google Scholar

14.

Bokermann W.C.A. 1972. Notas sobre Hyla clepsydra A. Lutz (Anura, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 32:291–295. Google Scholar

15.

Bokermann W.C.A., Sazima I. 1973. Anfíbios da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil, 1 - Espécies novas de “Hyla” (Anura, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 33:329–336. Google Scholar

16.

Boulenger G.A. 1898. An account of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr. W.F.H. Rosenberg in Western Ecuador. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1898:107–126. Google Scholar

17.

Boulenger G.A. 1902. LIV.—Descriptions of new batrachians and reptiles from the Andes of Peru and Bolivia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 10:394–402.  DOI  Google Scholar

18.

Brasil. 2014. Portaria № 444, de 17 de dezembro de 2014. Lista Nacional oficial de espécies da fauna ameaçadas de extinção. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Seção 1:110–121. Google Scholar

19.

Caramaschi U., Feio R.N. 1990. A new species of Hyla (Anura, Hylidae) from southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Copeia 1990:542–546.  DOI  Google Scholar

20.

Caramaschi U., Cruz C.A.G. 2013. A new species of the Hypsiboas polytaenius clade from southeastern Brazil (Anura: Hylidae). South American Journal of Herpetology 8:121–126.  DOI  Google Scholar

21.

Cardoso A.J. 1983. Descrição e biologia de uma nova espécie de Hyla Laurent, 1768 (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Iheringia 62:37–45. Google Scholar

22.

Cardoso A.J., Andrade G.V. 1982. Nova espécie de Hyla do Parque Nacional Serra da Canastra (Anura, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 42:589–593. Google Scholar

23.

Carvalho T.R., Giaretta A.A., Magrini L. 2012. A new species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group (Anura: Hylidae) from southeastern Brazil, with bioacoustic data on seven species of the genus. Zootaxa 3321:37–55.  DOI  Google Scholar

24.

Carvalho T.R., Giaretta A.A., Teixeira B.F.V., Martins L.B. 2013. New bioacoustic and distributional data on Bokermannohyla sapiranga Brandão et al., 2012 (Anura: Hylidae): revisiting its diagnosis in comparison with B. pseudopseudis (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937). Zootaxa 3746:383–392.  DOI  Google Scholar

25.

Cocroft R.B., Ryan M.J. 1995. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Animal Behaviour 49:283–303.  DOI  Google Scholar

26.

Cope E.D. 1862. Catalogues of the reptiles obtained during the explorations of the Parana, Paraguay, Vermejo and Uruguay Rivers, by Capt. Thos. J. Page, U.S.N.; and of those procured by Lieut. N. Michler, U.S. Top. Eng., Commander of the Expedition conducting the survey of the Atrato River. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14:346–359. Google Scholar

27.

Cope E.D. 1871. Eighth contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 11:553–559. Google Scholar

28.

Costa P.N., Lourenço A.C.C., Almeida-Santos P., Sluys M. 2010. Tadpole of the hylid frog Bokermannohyla gouveai (Peixoto & Cruz, 1992). Zootaxa 2418:61–64.  DOI  Google Scholar

29.

De Carlo J.A. 1950. Descripción de especies nuevas de Ranatridae y Belostomidae y algunas aclaraciones referentes a otras poco conocidas (Hemíptera). Revista Brasileira de Biología 10:521–532. Google Scholar

30.

de Sá R.O. 1988. Chondrocranium and ossification sequence of Hyla lanciformis . Journal of Morphology 195:345–355.  DOI  Google Scholar

31.

d'Heursel A., de Sá R.O. 1999. Comparing the tadpoles of Hyla geographica and Hyla semilineata . Journal of Herpetology 33:353–361.  DOI  Google Scholar

32.

d'Heursel A., Haddad C.F.B. 2007. Anatomy of the oral cavity of hylid larvae from the genera Aplastodiscus, Bokermannohyla, and Hypsiboas (Amphibia, Anura): description and systematic implications. Journal of Herpetology 41:458–468.  DOI  Google Scholar

33.

Duellman W.E., Marion A.B., Hedges S.B. 2016. Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae). Zootaxa 4104:1–109.  DOI  Google Scholar

34.

Eterovick P.C., Brandão R.A. 2001. A description of the tadpoles and advertisement calls of members of the Hyla pseudopseudis group. Journal of Herpetology 35:442–450.  DOI  Google Scholar

35.

Faivovich J., Haddad C.F.B., Garcia P.C.A., Frost D.R., Campbell J.A., Wheeler W.C. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294:1–240.  DOI  Google Scholar

36.

Faivovich J., Lugli L., Lourenço A.C.C., Haddad C.F.B. 2009. A new species of the Bokermannohyla martinsi group from central Bahia, Brazil with comments on Bokermannohyla (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica 65:303–310.  DOI  Google Scholar

37.

Faivovich J., Pereyra M.O., Luna M.C., Hertz A., Blotto B.L., Vásquez-Almazán C.R., … Haddad C.F.B. 2018. On the monophyly and relationships of several genera of Hylini (Anura: Hylidae: Hylinae), with comments on recent taxonomic changes in hylids. South American Journal of Herpetology 13:1–32.  DOI  Google Scholar

38.

Fieber F.X. 1851. Rhynchotographieen. Acten des Konilg Bohm. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, V. band 7. Google Scholar

39.

Frost D.R. 2018. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. Accessible at:  http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html Google Scholar

40.

Gaiga R., Loiola C., Mângia S., Pirani R.M. 2013. Advertisement call and tadpoles of Bokermannohyla vulcaniae (Vasconcelos and Giaretta, 2003) (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae). South American Journal of Herpetology 8:127–131.  DOI  Google Scholar

41.

Garey M.V., Provete D.B., Martins I.A., Haddad C.F.B., Rossa-Feres D.C. 2014. Anurans from the Serra da Bocaina National Park and surrounding buffer area, southeastern Brazil. Check List 10:308–316.  DOI  Google Scholar

42.

Gosner K.L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190. Google Scholar

43.

Haas A. 1996. Das larvale cranium von Gastrotheca riobambae und siene metamorphose (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 36:33–162. Google Scholar

44.

Haas A. 2003. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics 19:23–89.  DOI  Google Scholar

45.

Haas A., Richards S.J. 1998. Correlations of cranial morphology, ecology, and evolution in Australian suctorial tadpoles of the genera Litoria and Nyctimystes (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae: Pelodryadinae). Journal of Morphology 238:109–141.  DOI  Google Scholar

46.

Heyer W.R. 1985. New species of frogs from Boracéia, São Paulo, Brazil. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 98:657–671. Google Scholar

47.

Heyer W.R., Rand A.S., Cruz C.A.G., Peixoto O.L., Nelson C.E. 1990. Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de Zoologia 31:231–410. Google Scholar

48.

Hortal J., de Bello F., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Lewinsohn T.M., Lobo J.M., Ladle R.J. 2015. Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46:523–549.  DOI  Google Scholar

49.

Kolenc F., Borteiro C., Alcalde L., Baldo D., Cardozo D., Faivovich J. 2008. Comparative larval morphology of eight species of Hypsiboas Wagler (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae) from Argentina and Uruguay, with a review of the larvae of this genus. Zootaxa 1927:1–66.  DOI  Google Scholar

50.

Koslowsky J. 1895. Batracios y reptiles de la Rioja y Catamarca, recogidos durante los meses de febrero a mayo de 1895. Revista del Museo de La Plata 6:359–365. Google Scholar

51.

Lannoo M.J. 1987. Neuromast topography in anuran amphibians. Journal of Morphology 191:115–129.  DOI  Google Scholar

52.

Lavilla E.O., Fabrezi M. 1987. Anatomía de larvas de Hyla pulchella andina (Anura: Hylidae). Physis 45:77–82. Google Scholar

53.

Leite F.S.F., Eterovick P.C. 2010. Description of the tadpole of Bokermannohyla martinsi (Anura: Hylidae), morphological and ecological comparison with related Bokermannohyla tadpoles. Journal of Herpetology 44:431–440.  DOI  Google Scholar

54.

Lugli L., Haddad C.F.B. 2006a. A new species of the Bokermannohyla pseudopseudis group from central Bahia, Brazil (Amphibia, Hylidae). Herpetologica 62:453–465.  DOI  Google Scholar

55.

Lugli L., Haddad C.F.B. 2006b. New species of Bokermannohyla (Anura, Hylidae) from central Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 40:7–15.  DOI  Google Scholar

56.

Lutz A. 1925. Batraciens du Brésil. Comptes Rendus et Mémoires Hebdomadaires des Séances de la Société de Biologie et des ses Filiales 93:137–139. Google Scholar

57.

Lutz B. 1950. Anfíbios anuros da coleção Adolpho Lutz do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. V. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 48:599–637. Google Scholar

58.

Lutz A., Lutz B. 1939. New Hylidae from Brazil/Hylideos novos do Brasil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 11:67–89. Google Scholar

59.

Lutz B., Orton G.L. 1946. Hyla claresignata Lutz & B. Lutz, 1939. Aspects of its life history and description of the rhyacophilous tadpole. Boletim do Museu Nacional 70:1–27. Google Scholar

60.

Magalhães F.M., Neves M.D.O., da Fonseca E.M., Carvalho R.M.H. 2012. The tadpole of Bokermannohyla ibitipoca (Caramaschi & Feio, 1990) (Anura, Hylidae). Zootaxa 3415:58–62.  DOI  Google Scholar

61.

Magalhães F.M., Mercês E.A., Santana D.J., Juncá F.A., Napoli M.F., Garda A.A. 2015. The tadpole of Bokermannohyla flavopicta Leite, Pezzuti and Garcia, 2012 and oral cavity anatomy of the tadpole of B. oxente Lugli and Haddad, 2006 (Anura: Hylidae). South American Journal of Herpetology 10:211–218.  DOI  Google Scholar

62.

Martins I.A., Jim J. 2003. Bioacoustic analysis of advertisement call in Hyla nana and Hyla sanborni (Anura, Hylidae) in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63:507–516.  DOI  Google Scholar

63.

Mercês E.D., Protazio A.D., Juncá F.A. 2012. The tadpole of Bokermannohyla capra Napoli & Pimenta 2009 (Anura, Hylidae). Zootaxa 3167:66–68. Google Scholar

64.

Mercês E.A., Camurugi F., Barreto G.S., Solé M., Juncá F.A. 2015. The tadpole of Bokermannohyla lucianae (Napoli & Pimenta 2003) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Zootaxa 3904:298–300.  DOI  Google Scholar

65.

Miranda-Ribeiro A. 1926. Notas para servirem ao estudo dos Gymnobatrachios (Anura) Brasileiros. Arquivos do Museu Nacional 27:1–227. Google Scholar

66.

Miranda-Ribeiro A. 1937. Alguns batrachios novos das coleções do Museo Nacional. O Campo 8:66–69. Google Scholar

67.

Mongin M.M., Carvalho-e-Silva A.M.P.T. 2013. Descrição da morfologia oral interna, ontogenia e redescrição do girino de Bokermannohyla circumdata (Cope, 1870) (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais 8:133–152. Google Scholar

68.

Montandon A.L. 1905. Notes supplémentaires pour la faune nevroptérologique de la Roumanie. Buletinul Societăţii de Şciinţe din Bucureşci 14:675–679. Google Scholar

69.

Nali R.C., Prado C.P.A. 2014. Complex call with different messages in Bokermannohyla ibitiguara (Anura, Hylidae), a gladiator frog of the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Herpetology 48:407–414. Google Scholar

70.

Napoli M.F. 2005. A new species allied to Hyla circumdata (Anura: Hylidae) from Serra da Mantiqueira, southeastern Brazil. Herpetologica 61:63–69.  DOI  Google Scholar

71.

Napoli M.F. 2006. Bokermannohyla ahenea . The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T61771A12538275. Accessible at:  http://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2006.RLTS.T61771A12538275.en. Accessed: 29 March 2017. Google Scholar

72.

Napoli M.F., Caramaschi U. 2004. Two new species of the Hyla circumdata group from Serra do Mar and Serra da Mantiqueira, southeastern Brazil, with description of the advertisement call of Hyla ibitipoca (Anura, Hylidae). Copeia 2004:534–545.  DOI  Google Scholar

73.

Napoli M.F., Juncá F.A. 2006. A new species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae) from Chapada Diamantina, State of Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 1244:57–68. Google Scholar

74.

Napoli M.F., Pimenta B.V.S. 2003. Nova espécie do grupo de Hyla circumdata (Cope, 1870) do sul da Bahia, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 61:189–194. Google Scholar

75.

Napoli M.F., Pimenta B.V.S. 2009. A new species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata Group (Anura: Hylidae) from the coastal forests of Bahia, northeastern Brazil. Copeia 2009:674–683.  DOI  Google Scholar

76.

O'Leary M.A., Kaufman S.G. 2012. MorphoBank 3.0: Web application for morphological phylogenetics and taxonomy. Accessible at:  http://www.morphobank.orgGoogle Scholar

77.

Peixoto O.L. 1981. Nova espécie de Hyla da Serra dos Órgãos, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 41:515–520. Google Scholar

78.

Peixoto O.L., Cruz C.A.G. 1992. New species of Hyla from the “Serra da Mantiqueira, Itatiaia, Rio de Janeiro” State (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 87:197–200.  DOI  Google Scholar

79.

Peters W.C.H. 1872. Über eine Sammlung von Batrachiern aus Neu Freiburg in Brasilien. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1872:680–684. Google Scholar

80.

Peters W.C.H. 1882. Der namen der Batrachiergattung Hylonomus in Hyloscirtus zu Ändern und legte zwei neue Arten von Schlangen, Microsoma notatum und Liophis Ygraecum . Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1882:127–129.  DOI  Google Scholar

81.

Pezzuti T.L., Santos M.T.T., Martins S.V., Leite F.S.F., Garcia P.C.A., Faivovich J. 2015. The tadpoles of two species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group (Hylidae, Cophomantini). Zootaxa 4048:151–173.  DOI  Google Scholar

82.

Pinheiro P.D.P., Taucce P.P.G., Leite F.S.F., Garcia P.C.A. 2014. The advertisement call of the endemic Bokermannohyla martinsi (Bokermann, 1964) (Anura: Hylidae) from southern Espinhaço range, southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 3815:147–150.  DOI  Google Scholar

83.

Pombal J.P. Jr., Haddad C.F.B. 1993. Hyla luctuosa, a new treefrog from southeastern Brazil (Amphibia: Hylidae). Herpetologica 49:16–21. Google Scholar

84.

Provete D. 2016. Buccopharyngeal morphology of tadpoles in Scanning Electron Microscope. protocols.io.  DOI  Google Scholar

85.

Provete D.B., Garey M.V., Silva F.R., Jordani M.X. 2012. Knowledge gaps and bibliographical revision about descriptions of free-swimming anuran larvae from Brazil. North-Western Journal of Zoology 8:283–286. Google Scholar

86.

Pyron R.A. 2014. Biogeographic analysis reveals ancient continental vicariance and recent oceanic dispersal in amphibians. Systematic Biology 63:779–797.  DOI  Google Scholar

87.

Pyron R.A., Wiens J.J. 2011. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61:543–583.  DOI  Google Scholar

88.

Rocha P.C., Thompson J.R., Leite F.S.F., Garcia P.C.A. 2016. The advertisement call of Bokermannohyla flavopicta Leite, Pezzuti & Garcia 2012 (Anura: Hylidae) from mountains of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 4061:277–280.  DOI  Google Scholar

89.

Rossa-Feres D.C., Jim J., Fonseca M.G. 2004. Diets of tadpoles from a temporary pond in southeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21:745–754.  DOI  Google Scholar

90.

Sánchez D.A. 2010. Larval development and synapomorphies for species groups of Hyloscirtus Peters, 1882 (Anura: Hylidae: Cophomantini). Copeia 2010:351–363.  DOI  Google Scholar

91.

Sazima I., Bokermann W.C.A. 1977. Anfíbios da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. 3: Observações sobre a biologia de Hyla alvarengai Bok. (Anura, Hylidae). Brazilian Journal of Biologia 37:413–417. Google Scholar

92.

Sazima I., Bokermann W.C.A. 1978. Cinco novas especies de Leptodactylus do centro e sudeste Brasileiro (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 38:899–912. Google Scholar

93.

Scott N.J., Woodward B.D. 1994. Surveys at breeding sites. Pp. 118–125, in Heyer W.R., Donnelly M.A., McDiarmid R.W., Hayek L.-A.C., Foster M.S. (Eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. Google Scholar

94.

Spix J.B. von. 1824. Animalia nova sive species novae lacertarum quas in itinere per Brasiliam annis MDCCCXVII–MDCCCXX jussu et auspicius Maximiliani Josephi I Bavariae Regis suscepto collegit et descripsit Dr. J.B. de Spix. Typis Franc. Seraph. Hubschmanni, Monachii.  DOI  Google Scholar

95.

Strauβ A., Reeve E., Randrianiaina R.D., Vences M., Glos J. 2010. The world's richest tadpole communities show functional redundancy and low functional diversity: ecological data on Madagascar's stream-dwelling amphibian larvae. BMC Ecology 10:12.  DOI  Google Scholar

96.

Sueur J., Aubin T., Simonis C. 2008. Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18:213–226.  DOI  Google Scholar

97.

Sullivan B.K., Malmos K.B., Given M.F. 1996. Systematics of the Bufo woodhousii complex (Anura: Bufonidae): advertisement call variation. Copeia 1996:274–280.  DOI  Google Scholar

98.

Taucce P.P.G., Pinheiro P.D.P., Leite F.S.F., Garcia P.C.A. 2015. Advertisement call and morphological variation of the poorly known and endemic Bokermannohyla juiju Faivovich, Lugli, Lourenço and Haddad, 2009 (Anura: Hylidae) from central Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 3915:99–110.  DOI  Google Scholar

99.

Taylor W.R., Dyke G.C.V. 1985. Revised procedures for staining and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and cartilage study. Cybium 9:107–112. Google Scholar

100.

Toledo L.F., Haddad C.F.B. 2005. Acoustic repertoire and calling behavior of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura, Hylidae). Journal of Herpetology 39:455–464.  DOI  Google Scholar

101.

Vasconcelos E.G., Giaretta A.A. 2005. A new species of Hyla (Anura: Hylidae) from southeastern Brazil. Revista Española de Herpetología 17:21–27. Google Scholar

102.

Vera Candioti M.F. 2007. Anatomy of anuran tadpoles from lentic water bodies: systematic relevance and correlation with feeding habits. Zootaxa 1600:1–175. Google Scholar

103.

Walker M., Lourenço A.C.C., Pimenta B.V.S., Nascimento L.B. 2015. Morphological variation, advertisement call, and tadpoles of Bokermannohyla nanuzae (Bokermann, 1973), and taxonomic status of B. feioi (Napoli & Caramaschi, 2004) (Anura, Hylidae, Cophomantini). Zootaxa 3937:161–178.  DOI  Google Scholar

104.

Wassersug R.J. 1976. Oral morphology of anuran larvae: terminology and general description. Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum of the University of Kansas 48:1–23. Google Scholar

Appendices

APPENDIX

Specimens examined

Bokermannohyla ahenea: BRAZIL: São Paulo: São José do Barreiro, Parque Nacional da Serra da Bocaina, DZSJRP-Amphibia Tadpoles 1918.2; 1984.1; 2493.1–2495.1; DZSJRP-Amphibia-adults 12124, 12126, 13920, 13947, 13949–50, 13955–57; CFBH 28796–77, 28824.

© 2020 Brazilian Society of Herpetology
Michel V. Garey, Diogo B. Provete, Lilian S. Ouchi-Melo, Célio F.B. Haddad, and Denise de C. Rossa-Feres "The Larva and Advertisement Call of Bokermannohyla ahenea (Anura: Hylidae)," South American Journal of Herpetology 17(1), 1-16, (6 July 2020). https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-18-00006.1
Received: 4 January 2018; Accepted: 11 December 2018; Published: 6 July 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top