Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
10 January 2022 Adjustment of fecundity and sex ratio in response to social environments in a haplodiploid mite
Nuwan Weerawansha, Qiao Wang, Xiong Zhao He
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Animals can adjust reproductive strategies in favour of corporation or competition in response to local population size and density, the two key factors of social environments. However, previous studies usually focus on either population size or density but ignore their interactions. Using a haplodiploid spider mite, Tetranychus ludeni Zacher, we carried out a factorial experiment in the laboratory to examine how ovipositing females adjust their fecundity and offspring sex ratio during their early reproductive life under various population size and density. We reveal that females laid significantly more eggs with increasing population size and significantly fewer eggs with increasing population density. This suggests that large populations favour cooperation between individuals and dense populations increase competition. We demonstrate a significant negative interaction of population size and density that resulted in significantly fewer eggs laid in the large and dense populations. Furthermore, we show that females significantly skewed the offspring sex ratio towards female-biased in small populations to reduce the local mate competition among their sons. However, population density incurred no significant impact on offspring sex ratio, while the significant positive interaction of population size and density significantly increased the proportion of female offspring in the large and dense populations, which will minimise food or space competition as females usually disperse after mating at crowded conditions. These results also suggest that population density affecting sex allocation in T. ludeni is intercorrelated with population size. This study provides evidence that animals can manipulate their reproductive output and adjust offspring sex ratio in response to various social environments, and the interactions of different socio-environmental factors may play significant roles.

Introduction

Animals in patchy habitats often face intraspecific competitions (Iritani et al. 2020; Ausband & Mitchell 2021; Li & Zhang 2021) and adjust their reproductive strategies in response to social environments (Lihoreau & Rivault 2008; Ruan & Wu 2008; Krams et al. 2009; Schausberger et al. 2017; Conroy & Roff 2018; Crocker & Hunter 2018; Li & Zhang 2021). The number of individuals in a local population(population size) and the number of individuals per unit area in a habitat (population density) are two key socio-environmental forces that drive population regulations (Estevez et al. 2007; West 2009; Sprenger et al. 2011; Weerawansha et al. 2020; Ausband & Mitchell 2021). Fluctuations in population size and density alter the resources available for local individuals so that they must change their fecundity and offspring sex ratio accordingly to adapt (Wauters & Lens 1995; Estevez et al. 2007; Webber & Wal 2018; Burant et al. 2020; Weerawansha et al. 2020). However, in the field populations, the effect of population density is difficult to be disentangled from that of population size and vice versa due to their strong inter-relationship (Amsalem & Hefetz 2011). Few studies have distinguished the distinct effects of animal population density and size on reproduction and determined whether population density and size interact and how their interactions will alter an animal's reproductive strategies.

Larger population size and higher density often result in lower reproductive performance because of the intense competition for resources and increasing behavioural interference (Estevez et al. 2007; Wong et al. 2013; Li & Zhang 2021). For example, the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch has lower fecundity in a larger group with a higher density (Li & Zhang 2021). However, when the population density remains constant, females of the same species in larger groups lay more eggs than those in the smaller ones (Le Goff et al. 2010). Similar findings are also reported in many other group-living species (Avilés & Turino 1998; Prokopy & Reynolds 1998; Estevez et al. 2007; Salomon & Lubin 2007; Lihoreau & Rivault 2008; Krams et al. 2009). This phenomenon may be attributed to the fact that group living helps access to food and mates, protect against predators, and increase available time for forage and feeding efficiency (Ranta et al. 1993; Dyer 2000; Mori & Saito 2006; Sato & Saito 2006; Estevez et al. 2007; Vanthournout et al. 2016). To date, how female animals adjust their fecundity in response to variations of both population size and density is still not clear.

Mothers can also alter their offspring sex ratio in response to social environments (Hamilton 1967; Trivers & Willard 1973; Taylor & Bulmer 1980; Charnov 1982; West et al. 2005; West 2009; Iritani et al. 2020). For example, when the population density is high where food resources are limited, mothers should skew the offspring sex ratio towards the dispersing sex to reduce resource competition among siblings or close relatives (Clark 1978; Silk 1983; Mari et al. 2008; Hjernquist et al. 2009; Visser et al. 2014; Song et al. 2016). However, when food resources are sufficient in a small population, mothers should favor a female-biased offspring sex ratio to reduce the competition for mates between sons (Hamilton 1967; Sato & Saito 2006; Macke et al. 2012, 2014). So far, empirical studies on sex allocation have focused on offspring sex ratio regulation in response to either the population size or density (Charnov 1982; West et al. 2005; West 2009), ignoring the impact of potential interactions and relative importance of the population size and density.

Spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) are a group of haplodiploid invertebrates where mated females produce both male and female offspring and virgin ones give birth to male offspring only (Oku 2010; Zhou et al. 2018). They live in groups of patchy habitats and may have developed strategies to maximize their fitness under different population sizes and densit. In the present study, we used the spider mite Tetranychus ludeni Zacher as a model species to investigate how ovipositing females adjust their fecundity and sex ratio in response to the variation of social environments. To distinguish the different effects of population density and size and their interaction, we carried out a series of factorial experiments by allowing both population size and density to vary and recorded the number of eggs laid and proportion of female offspring. Information generated from this study provides insights into the mechanisms behind adjustment of fecundity and sex ratio in response to the various social environments.

Materials and Methods

Mite colony

A breeding colony of T. ludeni was raised from adults collected on Passiflora mollissima (Kunth) in Palmerston North, New Zealand in September 2017, and reared on 3- to 5-week-old kidney bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). We maintained the colony on the bean plants in an aluminium-frame cage (30 cm length × 30 cm width × 65 cm height) covered with 200-mesh nylon gauze with a zip door (20 cm width × 55 cm height) at 25 ± 1°C and 40–50% RH with a photoperiod of 16:8 hours (light:dark). We carried out the experiment in a walk-in climate control room under the above environmental conditions and used the first expanded leaves of 1- to 2-week-old bean plants for experiments.

Experimental design and data collection

To test how population size and density affected the reproduction of T. ludeni, we conducted a factorial experiment by allowing both population size and density to vary at three levels, with nine treatments: three population sizes (1, 5 and 10 mated females) × three population densities (0.7, 1 and 2 mated females/cm2), with 15–25 replicates for each treatment (Table 1). To obtain mated females, we randomly collected the quiescent female deutonymphs from the colony and individually introduced them onto a 1-cm2 leaf square placed upside down on a wet cotton pad in a Petri dish (9.5 cm diameter × 1.0 cm height) with a mesh-sealed hole (1 cm diameter) in the middle of the lid. Before the female emerged (silvery in colour), we introduced a newly emerged male adult produced by a virgin female onto the arena. We removed the male immediately after copulation ended.

TABLE 1.

A factorial design showing the leaf area, and population size and density for the experiment.

img-z3-5_61.gif

For each replicate, we transferred mated female(s) (< 1 hour old) of a desired population size and density onto a leaf square of desired size (Table 1) in a Petri dish mentioned above and allowed them to lay eggs for 24 hours. We then transferred the mate females to a new leaf square of the same size once every 24 hours and the process was repeated until they died. We recorded the number of eggs laid on each leaf square. We allowed the larvae hatching from the resulting eggs to live on the same leaf square for five days and subsequently transferred them onto another fresh leaf square of the same size where they developed to adulthood. The sex of the resulting offspring was then recorded once the adults emerged. The mites start laying eggs about a day after mating (unpublished data). We only used data recorded during the first five days of oviposition period for analysis because of the death of many females beyond day 5 of oviposition, which would change the social environment.

Statistical analysis

We analysed the data using SAS software (SAS 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Rejection level of H0 was set at P < 0.05. Data on the daily number of eggs laid and proportion of female offspring were not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test, UNIVARIATE procedure), we thus analysed these data using a generalized linear mixed model (GLIMMIX Procedure), with population size (PS) and density (PD) and their interactions (PS×PD) as the fixed factors and female age as a random factor. We ran a two-factor model to test the effects of PS and PD first, and then a three-factor model to test whether the PS×PD changed the effects of PS and PD.

Results

Effect of social environments on fecundity

When we tested the effect of population size (PS) and density (PD) simultaneously, we found that the females laid significantly more eggs with increasing PS (F1,843= 21.20, P < 0.0001) and significantly fewer eggs with increasing PD (F1,843= 17.19, P < 0.0001) (Figure 1a). Our analysis of the impact of PS×PD interactions on fecundity shows that when PS and PD were low, mothers laid significantly more eggs with the increase of both PS and PD (F1,842= 59.86, P < 0.0001 for PS; F1,842 = 7.09, P = 0.0079 for PD), but when PS and PD were high, females produced significantly fewer eggs with the increase of both PS and PD (F1,842 = 40.8, P < 0.0001) (Figure 1b).

FIGURE 1.

Effect of population size (PS, number of females per leaf square), density (PD, number of females/ cm2) and their interactions (PS×PD) on average fecundity of the first five days: (a) two-factor model, eggs = exp (1.2514 + 0.0189 PS - 0.1092 PD), and (b) three-factor model, eggs = exp (0.9737 + 0.0726 PS + 0.1181 PD - 0.0445 PS×PD).

img-z4-5_61.jpg

Effect of social environments on sex allocation

Our results indicate that when only PS and PD were included in the two-factor model, increasing PS significantly reduced the proportion of female offspring produced (F1,804= 14.40, P = 0.0002) but PD incurred no significant impact on sex allocation (F1,804 = 1.94, P = 0.1637) (Figure 2a). In the three-factor model, we found that PS×PD interaction significantly increased the proportion of female offspring at higher PS and PD (F1,803 = 10.61, P = 0.0012) but did not significantly alter the effects of PS and PD on sex allocation (F1,803 = 20.80, P < 0.0001 for PS; F1,803 = 3.57, P = 0.0592 for PD) (Figure 2b).

FIGURE 2.

Effect of population size (PS, number of females per leaf square), density (PD, number of females/ cm2) and their interactions (PS×PD) on average sex ratio of the first five days: (a) two-factor model, female offspring% = exp (- 0.2021 - 0.0061 PS + 0.0140 PD), and (b) three-factor model, female offspring% = exp (- 0.1449 - 0.0168 PS - 0.0331 PD + 0.0088 PS×PD).

img-z5-1_61.jpg

Discussion

Animals are believed to have evolved strategies to maximise their reproductive fitness in varied social environments (Estevez et al. 2007; Iritani et al. 2020; Weerawansha et al. 2020; Ausband & Mitchell 2021; Li & Zhang 2021). Similar to other species (e.g., Wardhaugh & Didham 2005; Khan et al. 2018; Li & Zhang 2021), T. ludeni females reduced their fecundity with the increase of population density (Figure 1a) because individuals at crowded conditions usually have a higher level of behavioural interferences or aggressions (Estevez et al. 2007; Wong et al. 2013; Li & Zhang 2021) and intense food competition (Wertheim et al. 2005; Burant et al. 2020). Spider mite populations can grow rapidly due to short lifecycles and high fecundity (Shih et al. 1976; Tuan et al. 2016) but their exponential population growth can end abruptly due to overexploitation of the host plants (Krips et al. 1998). Therefore, fecundity reduction at dense environments may be a flexible strategy of T. ludeni females to reduce the intensity of food competition and minimise the possibility of local population extinction.

However, when population size increased, the fecundity significantly increased in T. ludeni (Figure 1a). This may be attributed to cooperative nature of spider mites, i.e., aggregating and constructing common silk webs under the leaves, which protect them and their offspring from environmental hazards (Davis 1952; McMurtry et al. 1970; Ashley 2003; Mori & Saito 2005; Le Goff et al. 2010). Therefore, group living may increase access to food and time for forage and feeding (Ranta et al. 1993; Dyer 2000; Mori & Saito 2006; Sato & Saito 2006; Estevez et al. 2007; Vanthournout et al. 2016), and in turn promote reproduction. Similarly, many studies also report that the presence of conspecific eggs may stimulate female reproduction, for example, in the tobacco budworm Helicoverpa virescens (F.) (Navasero & Ramaswamy 1993), cactus bug Chelinidea vittiger aequoris McAtee (Fletcher & Miller 2008), and white butterfly Pieris napi L. (Raitanen et al. 2014).

In the present study, we found a significant interaction between population density and size, which altered the reproductive behaviour of T. ludeni (Figure 1b). First, fecundity significantly increased with the increase of population size when the population density was low, or with the increase of population density when the population size was small. Second, fecundity significantly decreased in large and dense populations. These results have two implications: (1) cooperation enhances spider mite reproduction when the population size is small and the population density is low, where the benefits of cooperation exceed the costs of food competition among the ovipositing females; and (2) the costs of food competition outweigh the benefits of cooperation if the populations are large and dense. These findings suggest that group-living females of T. ludeni can determine whether they corporate in reproduction or compete for resources under different social environments.

Sex allocation is one of the main life history traits that manipulate resource competition in a local population (Hamilton 1967; Clark 1978; West et al. 2005; West 2009). We demonstrated that T. ludeni mothers favoured a female-biased offspring sex ratio in a small population (Figure 2a) or in a small population with low density (Figure 2b). These results agree to the theoretical prediction of local mate competition (Hamilton 1967) and empirical studies on spider mites (Sato & Saito 2006; Macke et al. 2012, 2014), i.e., when mothers oviposit in a small group where their sons compete for mates, they will produce more daughters, reducing the local mate competition.

However, the population density did not significantly affect offspring sex ratio regardless of whether its interaction with population size was accounted for analysis or not, while the significant positive effect of interaction resulted in an increase of female-biased sex ratio in large and dense populations (Figure 2). We suggest that the effect of population density on sex allocation in T. ludeni is intercorrelated with that of population size. In a large and dense population, T. ludeni females produce more daughters that will disperse from the dense environments to form new colonies, reducing the competition for food or space (Clark 1978; Silk 1983; Mari et al. 2008; Hjernquist et al. 2009; Visser et al. 2014; Song et al. 2016). In addition, the mechanism of sex allocation adjustment in T. ludeni may have shifted from reducing mate competition in small and sparse populations to reducing competition for food or space in large and dense populations. Therefore, treating population density and size as independent factors in statistical models may generate misleading conclusions.

In conclusion, the present study provides evidence that T. ludeni females can immediately manipulate their reproductive output and adjust offspring sex ratio in response to social environments during their early reproductive period. We reveal that ovipositing mothers may have cooperated in a large population with low density or in a small population with high density to increase their reproduction. However, mothers may reduce their reproduction in a large and dense population due to the intense food or space competition. Furthermore, mothers can increase production of daughters in small populations with low density and large populations with high density to minimise mate and food/space competition, respectively. We propose that including interaction of population size and density in the statistical model is essential to generate accurate conclusions of the impacts of social environments on animal reproductive adjustments.

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Z.-Q. Zhang for identification of this spider mite, and K. Sinclair, P. Zhou and D. Ristyadi for technical assistance. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which have significantly improved the article. This work was jointly funded by Accelerating Higher Education Expansion and Development Project (AHEAD) launched by the Sri Lankan Government under the funds of the World Bank and Massey University Research Fund.

References

1.

Amsalem, E. & Hefetz, A. (2011) The Effect of group size on the interplay between dominance and reproduction in Bombus terrestris. PLoS One, 6(3), e18238.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018238 Google Scholar

2.

Ashley, J.L. (2003) Toxicity of selected acaricides on Tetranychus urticae Koch (Tetranychidae: Acari) and Orius insidiosus Say (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) life stages and predation studies with Orius insidiosus. MSc thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 54 pp. Google Scholar

3.

Ausband, D.E. & Mitchell, M.S. (2021) The effect of group size on reproduction in cooperatively breeding gray wolves depends on density. Animal Conservation, (published online)  https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12701 Google Scholar

4.

Avilés, L. & Tufiño, P. (1998) Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. The American Naturalist, 152(3), 403–418.  https://doi.org/10.1086/286178 Google Scholar

5.

Burant, J.B., Griffin, A., Betini, G.S. & Norris, D.R. (2020) An experimental test of the ecological mechanisms driving density-mediated carry-over effects in a seasonal population. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 98 (7), 425–432.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2019-0271 Google Scholar

6.

Charnov, E.L. (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 355 pp. Google Scholar

7.

Clark, A.B. (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science, 201(4351), 163–165.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4351.163 Google Scholar

8.

Conroy, L.P. & Roff, D.A. (2018) Adult social environment alters female reproductive investment in the cricket Gryllus firmus. Behavioral Ecology, 29(2), 440–447.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx193 Google Scholar

9.

Crocker, K.C. & Hunter, M.D. (2018) Social density, but not sex ratio, drives ecdysteroid hormone provisioning to eggs by female house crickets (Acheta domesticus). Ecology and Evolution, 8(20), 10257–10265.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4502 Google Scholar

10.

Davis, D.W. (1952) Influence of population density on Tetranychus multisetis. Journal of Economic Entomology, 45(4), 652–654.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/45.4.652 Google Scholar

11.

Dyer, F.C. (2000) Group movement and individual cognition: lessons from social insects. In: Boinski, S. & Garber, P.A. (eds) On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, pp. 127–164. Google Scholar

12.

Estevez, I., Andersen, I.L. & Nævdal, E. (2007) Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 103(3–4), 185–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.025 Google Scholar

13.

Fletcher, R.J. & Miller, C.W. (2008) The type and timing of social information alters offspring production. Biology Letters, 4(5), 482–485.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0306 Google Scholar

14.

Hamilton, W.D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156(3774), 477–488.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3774.477 Google Scholar

15.

Hjernquist, M.B., Thuman Hjernquist, K.A., Forsman, J.T. & Gustafsson, L. (2009) Sex allocation in response to local resource competition over breeding territories. Behavioral Ecology, 20(2), 335–339.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp002 Google Scholar

16.

Iritani, R., West, S.A. & Abe, J. (2021) Cooperative interactions among females can lead to even more extraordinary sex ratios. Evolution Letters, 5(4), 370–384.  https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.217 Google Scholar

17.

Khan, I., Prakash, A., Issar, S., Umarani, M., Sasidharan, R., Masagalli, J.N., Lama, P., Venkatesan, R. & Agashe, D. (2017) Female density-dependent chemical warfare underlies fitness effects of group sex ratio in flour beetles. The American Naturalist, 191(3), 306–317.  https://doi.org/10.1086/695806 Google Scholar

18.

Krams, I., Berziņš, A. & Krama, T. (2009) Group effect in nest defence behaviour of breeding pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Animal Behaviour, 77(2), 513–517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.007 Google Scholar

19.

Krips, O.E., Witul, A., Willems, P.E.L. & Dicke, M. (1998) Intrinsic rate of population increase of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae on the ornamental crop gerbera: intraspecific variation in host plant and herbivore. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 89(2), 159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00395.x Google Scholar

20.

Le Goff, G.J., Mailleux, A.C., Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Clotuche, G. & Hance, T. (2010) Group effect on fertility, survival and silk production in the web spinner Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) during colony foundation. Behaviour, 147, 1169–1184.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/20799538 Google Scholar

21.

Li, G.Y. & Zhang, Z.Q. (2021) The costs of social interaction on survival and reproduction of arrhenotokous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Entomologia Generalis, 41, 49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2020/0911 Google Scholar

22.

Lihoreau, M. & Rivault, C. (2008) Tactile stimuli trigger group effects in cockroach aggregations. Animal Behaviour, 75(6), 1965–1972.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.006 Google Scholar

23.

Macke, E., Olivieri, I. & Magalhães, S. (2014) Local mate competition mediates sexual conflict over sex ratio in a haplodiploid spider mite. Current Biology, 24(23), 2850–2854.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.040 Google Scholar

24.

Macke, E., Magalhães, S., Bach, F. & Olivieri, I. (2012) Sex-ratio adjustment in response to local mate competition is achieved through an alteration of egg size in a haplodiploid spider mite. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1747), 4634–4642.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1598 Google Scholar

25.

Mari, L., Gatto, M., Casagrandi, R., Mari, L., Gatto, M. & Casagrandi, R. (2008) Local resource competition and the skewness of the sex ratio: a demographic model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 5 (4), 813–830.  https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2008.5.813 Google Scholar

26.

McMurtry, J.A., Huffaker, C.B. & van de Vrie, M. (1970) Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: A review: I. Tetranychid enemies: Their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia, 40(11), 331–390.  https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v40n11P331 Google Scholar

27.

Mori, K. & Saito, Y. (2005) Variation in social behavior within a spider mite genus, Stigmaeopsis (Acari: Tetranychidae). Behavioral Ecology, 16(1), 232–238.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh157 Google Scholar

28.

Mori, K. & Saito, Y. (2006) Communal relationships in a social spider mite, Stigmaeopsis longus (Acari: Tetranychidae): an equal share of labor and reproduction between nest mates. Ethology, 112(2), 134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439-0310.2006.01130.X Google Scholar

29.

Navasero, R.C. & Ramaswamy, S.B. (1993) Influence of plant age, water stress, larval damage, and presence of conspecific eggs on oviposition by Heliothis virescens (F.) on cotton. Journal of Applied Entomology, 115, 97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1993.tb00369.x Google Scholar

30.

Oku, K. (2010) Males of the two-spotted spider mite attempt to copulate with mated females: effects of double mating on fitness of either sex. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 50, 107–113.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-009-9306-7 Google Scholar

31.

Prokopy, J.R. & Reynolds, A.H. (1998) Ovipositional enhancement through socially facilitated behaviour in Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 86, 281–286.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00290.x Google Scholar

32.

Ranta, E., Rita, H. & Lindstrom, K. (2015) Competition versus cooperation: success of individuals foraging alone and in groups. The American Naturalist, 142(1), 42–58.  https://doi.org/10.1086/285528 Google Scholar

33.

Raitanen, J., Forsman J.T., Kivelä, S.M., Mäenpää, M.I. & Välimäki, P. (2014) Attraction to conspecific eggs may guide oviposition site selection in a solitary insect. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 110–116.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art092 Google Scholar

34.

Ruan, H. & Wu, C.F. (2008) Social interaction-mediated lifespan extension of Drosophila Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase mutants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(21), 7506–7510.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711127105 Google Scholar

35.

Salomon, M. & Lubin, Y. (2007) Cooperative breeding increases reproductive success in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61(11), 1743–1750.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0406-2 Google Scholar

36.

Sato, Y. & Saito, Y. (2006) Nest sanitation in social spider mites: interspecific differences in defecation behavior. Ethology, 112(7), 664–669.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01184.x Google Scholar

37.

Schausberger, P., Gratzer, M. & Strodl, M.A. (2017) Early social isolation impairs development, mate choice and grouping behaviour of predatory mites. Animal Behaviour, 127, 15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.024 Google Scholar

38.

Shih, C.T., Poe, S.L. & Cromroy, H.L. (1976) Biology, life table and intrinsic rate of increase of Tetranychus urticae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 69(3), 62–364.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/69.2.362 Google Scholar

39.

Silk, J.B. (2015) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. The American Naturalist, 121(1), 56–66.  https://doi.org/10.1086/284039 Google Scholar

40.

Song, Z., Lou, Y., Hu, Y., Deng, Q., Gao, W. & Zhang, K. (2016) Local resource competition affects sex allocation in a bird: experimental evidence. Animal Behaviour, 121, 157–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.08.023 Google Scholar

41.

Sprenger, D., Lange, R. & Anthes, N. (2011) Population density and group size effects on reproductive behavior in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11(1), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-107 Google Scholar

42.

Taylor, P.D. & Bulmer, M.G. (1980) Local mate competition and the sex ratio. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 86(3), 409–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(80)90342-2 Google Scholar

43.

Trivers, R.L. & Willard, D.E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179(4068), 90–92.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4068.90 Google Scholar

44.

Tuan, S.J., Lin, Y.H., Yang, C.M., Atlihan, R., Saska, P. & Chi, H. (2016) Survival and reproductive strategies in two-spotted spider mites: demographic analysis of arrhenotokous parthenogenesis of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 109(2), 502–509.  https://doi.org/10.1093/JEE/TOV386 Google Scholar

45.

Vanthournout, B., Greve, M., Bruun, A., Bechsgaard, J., Overgaard, J. & Bilde, T. (2016) Benefits of group living include increased feeding efficiency and lower mass loss during desiccation in the social and inbreeding spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, 18.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00018 Google Scholar

46.

Visser, B., le Lann, C. Snaas, H., Hardy, I., & Harvey, J.A. (2014) Consequences of resource competition for sex allocation and discriminative behaviors in a hyperparasitoid wasp. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68(1), 105–113.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1627-1 Google Scholar

47.

Wardhaugh, C.W. & Didham, R.K. (2005) Density-dependent effects on the reproductive fitness of the New Zealand beech scale insect (Ultracoelostoma assimile) across multiple spatial scales. Ecological Entomology, 30(6), 733–738.  https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0307-6946.2005.00739.X Google Scholar

48.

Wauters, L.A. & Lens, L. (1995) Effects of food availability and density on red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) reproduction. Ecology, 76(8), 2460–2469.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2265820 Google Scholar

49.

Webber, Q.M.R. & Wal, E.V. (2018) An evolutionary framework outlining the integration of individual social and spatial ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(1), 113–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12773 Google Scholar

50.

Weerawansha, N., Wang, Q. & He, X.Z. (2020) Effect of foundress population density and size on reproduction and population growth of a haplodiploid mite. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 25(11), 2063–2076.  https://doi.org/10.11158/SAA.25.11.11 Google Scholar

51.

Wertheim, B., Baalen, E.J.A. van Dicke, M. & Vet, L.E.M. (2004) Pheromone-mediated aggregation in nonsocial arthropods: An Evolutionary Ecological Perspective. Annual Review of Entomology, 50, 321–346.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123329 Google Scholar

52.

West, S.A. (2009) Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 480 pp. Google Scholar

53.

West, S.A., Shuker, D.M. & Sheldon, B.C. (2005) Sex-ratio adjustment when relatives interact: a test of constraints on adaptation. Evolution, 59(6), 1211–1228.  http://www.jstor.org/stable/3448899 Google Scholar

54.

Wong, J.W.Y., Meunier, J. & Kölliker, M. (2013) The evolution of parental care in insects: the roles of ecology, life history and the social environment. Ecological Entomology, 38(2), 123–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12000 Google Scholar

55.

Zhou, P., He, X.Z. & Wang, Q. (2018) Sons from virgin mothers produce more daughters in a haplodiploid mite. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 23(9), 1869–1878.  https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.9.13 Google Scholar
© Systematic & Applied Acarology Society
Nuwan Weerawansha, Qiao Wang, and Xiong Zhao He "Adjustment of fecundity and sex ratio in response to social environments in a haplodiploid mite," Systematic and Applied Acarology 27(1), 61-70, (10 January 2022). https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.27.1.7
Received: 10 October 2021; Accepted: 30 November 2021; Published: 10 January 2022
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
interaction
population density
population size
reproduction
sex allocation
spider mite
Tetranychus ludeni
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top