Open Access
1 April 2008 New Data and New Questions for Crested Auklet Research
Author Affiliations +

In our recent reviews (Hagelin 2007a, b; Hagelin and Jones 2007) of the citrusy scent of Crested Auklets (Aethia cristatella), we aimed to provide readers with a balanced biological evaluation of the published data available at the time. (Hagelin et al. 2003) quantified the volatiles in Crested Auklet odor in μg g−1 feathers, which enabled us to make general comparisons with other studies. For example, some chemicals present in Crested Auklet odor have produced striking effects on ectoparasites, such as feather lice, which became moribund within seconds after very small quantities of compounds (1.0 μL) were placed on single feathers (Douglas et al. 2004). (Hagelin and Jones 2007) examined whether the chemical environment on these single feathers was similar to what is found on an adult bird. Specifically, we converted the total amount (μL) of compounds used against lice to μg g−1 feathers by multiplying by the density of the compound used (in μg μL−1) and dividing by the average weight of a single contour feather from the nape (0.0008 g, n = 10; see Hagelin 2007a). We then compared the result to values in (Hagelin et al. 2003). We made similar calculations for tests involving auklet ticks (Douglas et al. 2004).

Douglas (2008a, b) has since reported chemical concentrations that are higher than reported by (Hagelin et al. 2003). These new data indicate that the movement of a generalist tick of birds and mammals (Amblyomma americanum) was impaired at odorant concentrations that were equivalent to or less than average plumage concentrations of adult Crested Auklets (Douglas 2008a, b). We agree that the results are interesting, in that they also suggest that some tests used to assess chemical defense against auklet ticks (Ixodes uriae; Douglas et al. 2004) fell within ecologically realistic values. Crested Auklets exhibit a diverse ectoparasite fauna, as do related auklet species. Future tests of both ticks and lice that naturally occur on auklets promise to reveal comparative evidence as to whether a chemical "arms race" has occurred. One would predict, for example, that parasites occurring on Crested Auklets would be more resistant to chemical concentrations reported in (Douglas 2008b) than those from more distantly related auklet species.

(Douglas 2008b) and (Hagelin et al. 2003) used different methods to quantify odor compounds, which we hesitate to compare without direct tests. (Hagelin et al. 2003) examined the volatile components of feather samples and reported only those compounds that exhibited significant seasonal patterns. Our aim was to characterize the odor environment that birds experience when engaged in "ruff-sniff" displays. (Douglas 2008b) measured the amount of compound extracted from feathers with an alcohol solvent, which, we expect, could relate more directly to the experience of parasites on feather surfaces. Regarding methods, it is important to point out that primitive field conditions in the outer Aleutian Islands allowed feathers to be stored inside sealed vials in the dark at cool temperatures (0–11°C) but prevented (Hagelin et al. 2003) from freezing samples to −80°C until weeks after collection. However, the chemical results we obtained were remarkably similar to those from captive birds, which were frozen within minutes of collection (see table 1 in Hagelin et al. 2003). Our chemist collaborator also verified the efficacy of our methods by comparing our 2003 results to replicate samples of gases (L. E. L. Rasmussen unpubl. data) collected directly from auklet napes using a technique pioneered by her lab (evacuated stainless cylinders; see Perrin et al. [1996] and Rasmussen and Perrin [1999] for details on sampling live animals). (Hagelin et al. 2003) had funding to chemically assess feather samples from 10 birds, and we have published data for every individual that we have analyzed.

The new data in (Douglas 2008b) reveal that there is still much to be learned from the auklet system. If scent acts as a dynamic indicator trait (e.g., Hill et al. 1999) during the social interactions of Crested Auklets (see Jones et al. 2004, Hagelin 2007b, Douglas 2008b), one might expect high levels of individual, seasonal, and geographic variation in odor concentration. Preliminary analyses in our lab, for example, have detected 15- to 60-fold differences in concentration between feather samples collected at different sites during different seasons. Odor concentration also appears to vary between age classes (Sealy 2006) and between different captive populations (Douglas et al. 2001, Hagelin et al. 2003, Douglas 2008b), which suggests that scent could be linked to development or, perhaps, environmental factors such as diet. We find the prospects for research on these and other questions exciting, and we welcome productive discussions with Douglas and others on such topics in the future.



H. D. Douglas III 2008a. In defense of chemical defense: Quantification of volatile chemicals in feathers is challenging. Auk 125:496–497. Google Scholar


H. D. Douglas III 2008b. Prenuptial perfume: Alloanointing in the social rituals of the Crested Auklet (Aethia cristatella) and the transfer of arthropod deterrents. Naturwissenschaften 95:45–53. Google Scholar


H. D. Douglas III, J. E. Co, T. H. Jones, and W. E. Conner . 2001. Heteropteran chemical repellents identified in the citrus odor of a seabird (Crested Auklet: Aethia cristatella): Evolutionary convergence in chemical ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88:330–332. Google Scholar


H. D. Douglas III, J. E. Co, T. H. Jones, and W. E. Conner . 2004. Interspecific differences in Aethia spp. auklet odorants and evidence for chemical defense against ectoparasites. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30:1921–1935. Google Scholar


J. C. Hagelin 2007a. Odors and chemical signaling. 76–119. Reproductive Behavior and Phylogeny of Aves. vol. 6B.( B. G M. Jamieson , editor. Science Publishers. Enfield, New Hampshire. Google Scholar


J. C. Hagelin 2007b. The citrus-like scent of Crested Auklets: Reviewing the evidence for an avian olfactory ornament. Journal of Ornithology 148:S195–S201. Google Scholar


J. C. Hagelin and I. L. Jones . 2007. Bird odors and other chemical substances: A defense mechanism or overlooked mode of intraspecific communication. Auk 124:741–761. Google Scholar


J. C. Hagelin, I. L. Jones, and L. E L. Rasmussen . 2003. A tangerine-scented social odour in a monogamous seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270:1323–1329. Google Scholar


J. A. Hill, D. A. Enstrom, E. D. Ketterson, V. Nolan Jr., and C. Ziegenfus . 1999. Mate choice based on static versus dynamic secondary sexual traits in the Dark-eyed Junco. Behavioral Ecology 10:91–96. Google Scholar


I. L. Jones, J. C. Hagelin, H. L. Major, and L. E L. Rasmussen . 2004. An experimental field study of the function of Crested Auklet feather odor. Condor 106:71–78. Google Scholar


T. E. Perrin, L. E L. Rasmussen, R. Gunawardena, and R. A. Rasmussen . 1996. A method for collection, long-term storage, and bioassay of labile volatile chemosignals. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22:207–221. Google Scholar


L. E L. Rasmussen and T. E. Perrin . 1999. Physiological correlates of musth: Lipid metabolites and chemical composition of exudates. Physiology and Behavior 67:539–549. Google Scholar


S. G. Sealy 2006. A historical perspective on the citrus-like scent of the Crested Auklet. Western Birds 37:139–148. Google Scholar
JULIE C. HAGELIN "New Data and New Questions for Crested Auklet Research," The Auk 125(2), 497-498, (1 April 2008).
Received: 25 February 2008; Accepted: 1 March 2008; Published: 1 April 2008
Back to Top