How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2010 Are There Optimal Densities for Prairie Birds?
Susan K. Skagen, Amy A. Yackel Adams
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The major forces of food and predation shape fitness-enhancing decisions of birds at all stages of their life cycles. During the breeding season, birds can minimize nest loss due to predation by selecting sites with a lower probability of predation. To understand the environmental and social aspects and consequences of breedingsite selection in prairie birds, we explored variation in nest-survival patterns of the Lark Bunting (Calamospiza melanocorys) in the shortgrass prairie region of North America. Over four breeding seasons, we documented the survival of 405 nests, conducted 60 surveys to estimate bird densities, and measured several vegetative features to describe habitat structure in 24 randomly selected study plots. Nest survival varied with the buntings' density as described by a quadratic polynomial, increasing with density below 1.5 birds ha-1 and decreasing with density between 1.5 and 3 birds ha-1, suggesting that an optimal range of densities favors reproductive success of the Lark Bunting, which nests semi-colonially. Nest survival also increased with increasing vegetation structure of study plots and varied with age of the nest, increasing during early incubation and late in the nestling stage and declining slightly from mid-incubation to the middle of the nestling period. The existence of an optimal range of densities in this semi-colonial species can be elucidated by the “commodity-selection hypothesis” at low densities and density dependence at high densities.

©2010 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp.
Susan K. Skagen and Amy A. Yackel Adams "Are There Optimal Densities for Prairie Birds?," The Condor 112(1), 8-14, (1 February 2010). https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.090155
Received: 12 August 2009; Accepted: 1 November 2009; Published: 1 February 2010
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top