Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2011 Outbreak of Eacles imperialis (Saturniidae) on Cocoa and Fruit Trees in Milagro — Ecuador
Jorge R. Paredes, Esther L. Peralta, David L. Wagner, Moria L. Robinson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The account represents the first record of E. imperialis (Drury) as cocoa pest. The moth was founded in Milagro - Ecuador producing prominent defoliation on cocoa and other fruit trees.

A marked eruption of larvae of the saturniid Eacles imperialis (Drury) occurred in late March 2010 in the Milagro Canton, Guayas Province, Ecuador. In Ecuador there are no official records of this moth on cocoa (Theobroma cacao L., clon CCN-51) or national or fine flavor cocoa (T. cacao L.), nor in other commercial trees, severe enough to cause major defoliation. According to local farmers, larval numbers erupted for the first time, causing up to 95% defoliation of commercial cocoa cultivars.

Relatively few groups of insects from Ecuador have been well studied (e.g. Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera) and Carabidae (Coleoptera)), and thus knowledge of other families lags far behind (Barrera 2008). Dangles et al. (2009) mentioned that the paucity of entomological knowledge was due to the great diversity of Ecuadorian species living in a wide range of habitats and the difficulty of identifying the majority of tropical insect species, and in spite of the national effort to gather information on the taxonomy and ecology of insects, progress has been slow (Jiggins et. al. 2006; Moret 2005). Due to this lack of knowledge of Ecuadorian insects and their biology, control techniques are often inappropriate.

It is likely that the saturniid that is the focus of this report, E. imperialis, was resident prior to the planting of commercial crops. Changes in factors such as relative humidity, temperature and photoperiod, as well as the excessive use of chemicals contributed to “seasonal” pest emergence in high population levels; according to some authors, those factors affect the population of Lepidopteran natural enemies (Tanada & Fuxa 1987; Carrero & Planes 2008). Below we describe an outbreak caused by E. imperialis larvae in Ecuadorian cocoa and fruit tree plantations.

Methods

Percentage of defoliation was estimated using the Townsend-Heuberger formula. Evaluation of defoliated trees was carried out using a scale from 0 to 5 (where 0= 0% and 5 = 90–100% defoliation). Larvae were identified by Kirby Wolfe (personal communication), and compared to descriptions of Ferguson (1971) and Tuskes et al. (1996). In order to understand the current status of this pest in Ecuador as well as historical records of macrolepidopteran outbreaks, the official Ecuadorian registers of pests on economically important crops and available publications and newsletters were reviewed.

Results

The outbreak of E. imperialis larvae on cocoa and other fruit trees caused prominent defoliation (Figure 1A), reaching an average of 95% over 313.82 acres. High densities of larvae were found in plantations, with a minimum of more than ten individuals per tree. The use of expensive doses of chemicals to eliminate the pest provoked economic losses due to the increment of production costs and environmental damages not yet evaluated.

Macrolepidoptera larvae were collected in the “La Garganta” community (Milagro, Guayas Province), located at 2°06′52.66″ south latitude and 79°34′12.30″ west longitude (Figure 1B). Existing records do not document the presence of this insect in the province of Guayas.

Fig. 1.

(A) Defoliation caused by E. imperialis. (B) Location of outbreak. Region affected by defoliator presence indicated in yellow. Polymorphism of E. imperialis larvae: (C) brown, (D) reddish brown, (E) light green, 2010 CIBE - ESPOL©

f01_256.jpg

According to Tuskes et al. (1996), the most frequent host plants of E. imperialis are pine (Pinus), oak (Quercus), box elder (Acer negando), and other maples, sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and sassafras (Sassafras albidiam). In addition, Ferguson (1971) cited that larvae of E. imperialis in North America have been reported to feed on many tree species: Tabebuia, Juglans, Cupressus, Cedrus, Gleditsia, Rhus, and Fagus. Other common hosts cited in Wagner (2005) include Tilia, Acer, Betula, and Ulmus. The recent outbreak of E. imperialis in Ecuador occurred in commercial cultivars of cacao (Theobroma cacao, clon CCN-51) and on national cocoa (“arriba” fine or flavor cocoa). In addition, we recorded the caterpillars feeding on several fruit trees species, including mango (Mangifera indica L.), plum (Spondias purpurea L.), zapote [Quararibea cordata (Humboldt & Bonpland) Vischer], guava (Psidium guajava L.), “guaba” (Inga edulis Mart) and banana (Musa sp.). Severe defoliation, of at least some individual plants, was noted on all of these hosts.

Discussion

This report may show how the effect of global warming and other factors including agronomic practices could contribute to new pest emergence. On the other hand, the information about the status of the pest in Ecuador is characterized by the lack of official records of this pest species on cocoa cultivation and other fruit trees. INIAP, Ecuador's agricultural research institution, mentioned in its “Guide for cocoa cultivation in the Amazon” (2001) that pests such as Apatelodes costariseni, Dimorpha quaesita and Eacles masoni cause defoliation damage on cocoa crops in the Ecuadorian Amazon region. Barrera (2008) listed E. masoni and E. imperialis as coffee pests in Brazil. The Andean inventory of pests and plant diseases (1996) includes E. masoni as a cocoa defoliator with a limited distribution in certain regions, that is sometimes responsible for moderate levels of impact and which sometimes requires obligatory control (=application of pesticides).

Racheli & Racheli (2006) indicated the presence in Ecuador of two subspecies of E. imperialis: E. i. cacicus (Drury, 1773) in the provinces of Sucumbíos, Orellana, Napo, Tungurahua and Morona-Santiago; and E. i. anchycayensis (Lemaire, 1971) in the provinces of Esmeraldas, Manabí and Pichincha. In addition, two subspecies of E. masoni have been recorded in the Coastal provinces, mountains, and Eastern Ecuador: E. m. tyrannus (Draudt, 1930), in Pichincha, Manabí and Cañar, and E. m. fulvaster (Rothschild, 1907), distributed in Sucumbíos, Orellana, Napo and Morona-Santiago. None of these have been previously recorded in Guayas.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. David Wagner from University of Connecticut for providing bibliographic material and for his suggestions on a first draft, Drs L. Kirby Wolfe from Natural History Museum of Los Angeles and John Heppner from University of Florida for collaborating in the confirmation of the species, Drs Lyle Buss and Jorge Peña from University of Florida for being interested in this account. Thanks also to the farmers from “La Garganta” (Milagro, Guayas) for allowing specimen collections, and Engs. Pablo Chong, Lisbeth Espinoza and Eduardo Chávez from GIBE for their cooperation in field sampling and survey.

Literature Cited

1.

J. F. Barrera 2008. Coffee pests and their management. Pp. 961–998, In : J. L. Capinera (ed.), Encyclopedia of Entomology. 2nd ed. Springer. Google Scholar

2.

J. M. Y. Carrero , & S. Planes . 2008. Plagas del Campo. Ediciones Mundi Prensa. Madrid. 775 pp. Google Scholar

3.

O. Dangles , A. R. Barragán , R. E. Cárdenas , G. Onore , & C. Keil . 2009. Entomology in Ecuador: Recent developments and future challenges. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N. S.) 45(4): 424–436. Google Scholar

4.

D. C. Ferguson 1971 The Moths of North America Fascicle 20.2A. Bombycoidea, Saturniidae, Citheroniinae, Hemileucinae (Part). E. W. Classey Limited and R.B.D. Publications London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

5.

C. D. Jiggins , R. Mallarino , K. W. Willmott , & E. Bermingham . 2006. The phylogenetic pattern of speciation and wing pattern change in neotropical Ithomia butterflies (Lepidoptera; Nymphalidae). Evolution 60: 1454–1466 Google Scholar

6.

Junta del Acuerdo de Cartagena. 1996. Inventario Subregional de Plagas y Enfermedades de los Vegetales de importancia económica para el Área Andina. Resolución No 419. Google Scholar

7.

P. Moret 2005. Los coleopteros Carabidae del páramo de los Andes del Ecuador. Sistemática, ecología y biogeografía. Centro de Biodiversidad y Ambiente, Torino, Italia, 306 pp. Google Scholar

8.

L Racheli & T. Racheli , 2006. An update checklist of the Saturniidae of Ecuador. Part II: Arsenurinae, Ceratocampinae, Saturniinae (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). SHILAP Rev. Lipid. 34(135): 197:211. Google Scholar

9.

H. Rogg , 2000. Manual: Manejo integrado de plagas en cultivos de la Amazonía. Mossaico Press, Quito. Ecuador. 185 pp. Google Scholar

10.

Y. Tanada , & J. R. Fuxa (eds.). 1987. Epizootiolgy of insect diseases. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 555pp. Google Scholar

11.

P. M. Tuskes , J. P. Tuttle , & M. M. Collins . 1996. The wild silk moths of North America: a natural history of the Saturniidae of the United States and Canada. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. New York. 250 pp. Google Scholar

12.

D. L. Wagner 2005. Caterpillars of eastern North America: A guide to identification and natural history. Princeton University Press. 512 pp. Google Scholar
Jorge R. Paredes, Esther L. Peralta, David L. Wagner, and Moria L. Robinson "Outbreak of Eacles imperialis (Saturniidae) on Cocoa and Fruit Trees in Milagro — Ecuador," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 65(4), 256-258, (1 December 2011). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v65i4.a5
Received: 23 August 2010; Accepted: 15 August 2011; Published: 1 December 2011
KEYWORDS
defoliation
host range
Back to Top