Translator Disclaimer
18 March 2013 Preliminary Observations on the behavior and ecology of the Peruvian night monkey (Aotus Miconax: Primates) in a remnant cloud forest Patch, north eastern Peru
Sam Shanee, Nestor Allgas, Noga Shanee
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Peruvian night monkey (Aotus miconax) is endemic to the eastern slopes of the Andes in northern Peru. We present preliminary behavioral data on A. miconax collected during 12 months of surveys on a single group living in a 1.4 ha forest fragment near the Centro Poblado La Esperanza, Amazonas Department. Follows were conducted for five nights each month around full moon. The group used 1.23 ha as their home range. Night ranges were between 0.16 and 0.63 ha. Activity budgets were 32 % feeding, 53 % travelling and 13 % resting. Average night path length was 823 m and average travel speed was 117 m/h. The study group has one of the smallest home ranges recorded for a night monkey group, probably the result of its isolated habitat. These results represent the first behavioral data on this species but results are limited by small sample sizes. A. miconax remains one of the least studied of all primates and is threatened by continued expansion of human populations and hunting.

Introduction

The Andean night monkey (Aotus miconax) is one of the least studied of all Neotropical primate taxa. Aotus miconax is endemic to northeastern Peru [1, S. Shanee unpublished data], a threatened area characterized by high levels of endemism [2, 3]. Aotus miconax is limited to cloud forests between 1200 and 3000 meters above sea level (S. Shanee unpublished data). This species is listed as Vulnerable by the IUCN (Red List categories A2c) and Endangered under Peruvian law (Decreto Supremo 34-2004-AG). The current IUCN listing does not accurately represent the species' actual conservation status, underestimating habitat loss and fragmentation. The species would probably be better considered Endangered under the same categories (A2c).

Aotus miconax has not been the focus of previous behavioral studies, although some behavioral observations have been made [4, 5]. Aside from these studies, it is only known from collection localities in the departments of Amazonas, Huánuco and San Martin [4567]. These same departments have some of the highest deforestation rates in Peru [8, 9]. Deforestation in the area is fueled by immigration of people from the central and northern highlands looking for land for agriculture, cattle ranching and timber extraction [101112]. Patterns of land use and ownership have caused the fragmentation of forests, forming an anthropogenic landscape mosaic [12, 13].

Fragmentation can severely affect primate ecology, reducing the area available for foraging, limiting migration opportunities, causing changes in ecology, group structure and demography as well as disrupting genetic flow between populations and increased risk of parasite infections [1415161718]. Fragmentation also increases exposure of primates to anthropogenic threats [19202122]. Species living in heavily fragmented forests and isolated patches face additional challenges to their survival and often develop new ecological strategies to enable them to persist in the new landscape [15, 23]. Many differences exist in species' responses to living in fragmented forests; those that are successful usually show a high degree of behavioral and dietary plasticity and the ability to utilize outlying areas [15, 23, 24]. Specifically, studies have suggested reduced presence and an increase in parasite load in Aotus spp. in fragmented forests [18, 25], although studies of Aotus miconax and the Colombian night monkey (Aotus lemurinus) have shown adaptability to living in forest fragments [23, 24].

In natural conditions Aotus spp. live in small groups of two to six individuals (personal observation). These groups generally comprise an adult hetero-sexual pair with one to four juveniles and infants [26]. The diet of night monkeys is primarily frugivorous although leaves, buds and insects also figure in their diet [27, 28]. Fruiting figs (Ficus spp.) are a preferred food source in all studied species [26]. Aotus spp. are primarily nocturnal although some species are cathemeral, active nocturnally and diurnally [293031]. Both nocturnal and diurnal activity is influenced by moon luminosity [27, 31]. Results from the few previous studies show that Aotus miconax has group structure and behaviours similar to those of other Aotus spp. [5, 23, 32].

We aimed to gather preliminary data on the behavior, diet and ecology of a group of Aotus miconax to provide data from which to design and analyze future studies of this poorly known species. We conducted night follows and ad-libitum data collection in a small forest fragment within a mosaic landscape. This was done to provide baseline data on the species and the interactions between night monkeys and their habitat in an anthropogenic environment.

Methods

Field work took place in the Comunidad Campesina Yambrasbamba, Amazonas department, Peru (Fig. 1). The area is a mosaic of disturbed primary and regenerating secondary cloud forests. In areas closer to human settlement this landscape becomes steadily less forested, with isolated fragments of ~ 0.5 ha to ~ 10 ha surrounded by pasture and small cultivated plots. Riparian forests and living fences are common, allowing at least partial connectivity between patches. The area lies on the eastern slopes of the Andes with elevations between ~ 1800 and 2400 meters a.s.l. Terrain is rugged with steep river valleys separated by high mountain ridges. Temperatures are cool, 10 to 25 °C in the day, dropping to 6 °C before dawn. Rainfall is heavy year round, with a drier season from June to November and wetter season from December to May. Average monthly rainfall is ~ 1500 mm.

The focal group lived in a small ~ 1.4 ha isolated forest patch, approximately one km from the closest neighboring patch (Fig. 1) near the village of La Esperanza (S 05°42′17″, W 77°54′14″). The patch consisted of disturbed remnant cloud forest vegetation with a mix of primary and secondary species with all large timber species removed > 20 years ago. Trails were cut in a 10 × 10 meter grid, creating a series of 100 m2 quadrants; all intersections were tagged. Observations were recorded directly onto maps showing the quadrants.

Fig. 1.

Location of study site showing forested and deforested areas.

10.1177_194008291300600104-fig1.tif

Observations took place on a single group. At the start of the study the group consisted of five individuals (two adults, two sub-adults/juveniles and one infant). One individual was born in April 2010, leaving six individuals at the end of the study (two adults, three sub-adults/juveniles and one infant). Determination of age classes was subjective, based on comparison of size and genital visibility.

Data collection was carried out for 12 months between January and June 2010 and September 2010 and February 2011. Two follows were conducted each night, between ~ 18:30 – 22:00 hours and 03:00 – 06:30 hours for five consecutive nights each month. These times were chosen because previous studies of Aotus spp. suggest generally higher activity levels during these hours [31, 33]. As this was a preliminary study and because of time constraints, we carried out observations during nights when natural visibility would aid observation. Our night follows took place on days around the full moon (between 80 – 100% illumination of the moon's surface). We were not always able to carry out follows during the same range of nights, e.g. not always two days before and after the full moon. Light intensity was variable with shifting cloud cover during most follows.

Of the 60 nights of data collection we abandoned 23 follows. Follows were abandoned due to inclement weather or when the group was lost near the start of a follow and we were unable to relocate it. One further follow was dropped from analysis because the group was clearly influenced by the presence of observers, emitting distress vocalizations and travelling away from observers without pause for the first two hours of the follow. This left 36 half-night follows totaling 69.2 hours of observation (avg. 112.2 minutes per follow). These were distributed unevenly between six morning follows and 30 evening follows. Night ranges were calculated using data from nights when both evening and morning follows were completed successfully (n = 6). We made follows in groups of one to three trained observers, using red light, conventional and high power 1.25 watt CREE flashlights. We avoided shining high-power beams directly at observed individuals, especially over short distances.

When the group was identified, it was already well habituated to the presence of humans due to the proximity of the village of La Esperanza and outlying houses. Also, local residents regularly pass through the fragment and many use it as a source of firewood. No particular habituation schedule was followed, although we furthered the habituation process prior to the study whilst testing methodologies and preparing transects.

Individuals were not recognized and so observations were made on the group as a whole using scan sampling methodology [34]. Position of the group was recorded as whichever quadrant contained the majority of visible group members, or whichever quadrant had the highest number of group members in the case of the group being spread across more than two quadrants. We used continuous scan sampling methodology and recorded the predominant behavior displayed by a majority of visible group members, discounting non-locomoting infants [34]. Group behaviors were divided into four discrete categories: feeding, traveling, resting and other. Other behaviors were noted separately and not used in overall activity budgets as they were rarely observed. Night ranges were calculated as the number of grid cells used by the group during nights when both evening and morning follows were completed. Travel speed was calculated as the minimum distance, parallel with or diagonally across grid squares, per hour, thus representing a minimum estimate.

We also collected data on diet. Food types were separated into five categories: fruit, flower, leaf, bud (inclusive of flower and leaf buds) and insects. Data on food sources were collected through direct observation during feeding bouts. Attempts were made at field identification of arboreal food sources. When this was not possible samples were collected for later identification at the Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza de Amazonas.

Results

Travel and home range:

Average travel speed was 117 ± 43 meters per hour (min = 50 m/h, max = 190 m/h). The slowest travel speeds were observed during the dry season in September (50 m/h, n = 3), with highest travel speeds occurring during the wet season in April (190 m/h, n= 5) (Table 1). There was no significant difference found in travel speeds between seasons (χ2 = 0.98, df = 1, p = 0.32). Average night path length, based on our partial night follows, was 823 m ± 304 (min = 339 m, max = 1,314 m). Average night path length was similar between seasons (766 m wet season and 800 m dry season); the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.39, df = 1, p = 0.85) (Table 1).

The group used ~ 88% of the patch as their home range (Fig. 2). Most of the available habitat (~ 54%) was used on less than 20% of follows, with only a small portion of available area (~ 4.3%) used regularly. Night range averaged 0.44 ± 0.19 ha (min = 0.16 ha, max = 0.63 ha). Seasonal ranges were; 0.42 ha in the wet season and 0.67 in the dry season, although the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.81, df = 1, p = 0.36) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Monthly activity budgets and ranging behaviours.

10.1177_194008291300600104-table1.tif

Activity Budget:

The focal group was active during all observation hours. The group left their sleeping site between 17:46 hrs and 18:56 hrs (n = 31, including abandoned follows) and re-entered the sleeping site between 05:28 hrs and 06:28 hrs (n = 7), always leaving and returning to the nest during daylight hours. The focal group averaged 33 ± 7 % of their time feeding, 54 ± 11 % travelling and 13 ± 11 % resting (Table 1). Bouts of resting averaged 18 ± 13 mins. No significant difference was found in time spent feeding (χ2 = 0.62, df = 1, p = 0.43), travelling (χ2 = 0.56, df = 1, p = 0.45) or resting (χ2 = 0.71, df = 1, p = 0.39) between seasons.

Diet

The diet of the focal group consisted of 42 % fruits, 5 % flowers, 6 % leaves, 25 % buds and 19 % insects. In total 22 plant species, 21 trees and one vine were consumed. Arboreal food sources included naranjillo (Styloceras laurifolium), huarumbo (Cercropia montana), huarumbo (Cercropia utcubambana), casaco (Hyeronima andina), higueron (Ficus eximia), higueron (Ficus spp.), Ilajas (Casearia decandra), caimito (Chrysophyllum venezuelanense), palmera (Ceroxylon peruvianum), Neosprucea montana, cocona (Solanum sp.), guaba (Inga feuillei), guaba (Inga spp.), indano (Bunchosia armeniaca) and tumbe (Styrax sp). A further eight species still need to be identified.

Fig. 2.

Map of forest patch showing frequency of use for each quadrant.

10.1177_194008291300600104-fig2.tif

Other observations

We never witnessed diurnal activity. Cathemeral behavior was inferred on three occasions when the group was left at a sleeping site in the morning but was not encountered at the same sleeping site in the evening.

The focal group used at least five sleeping sites during the study period, one located in a tree hole and three in vine tangles. Although we were not able to locate the fifth sleeping site, we observed the group starting and finishing their activities from the same area on a number of occasions. During observations the group changed sleeping site every three to five days. All nests were in the mid and lower story between five and ten meters above the ground.

Most vocal activity was between 19:00 and 21:00 hrs. Vocal behaviors were only observed once during morning follows. Vocal bouts did not last long, usually consisting of a short series of grunt-barks, lasting less than two minutes. On one occasion we observed the whole group vocalizing for eight minutes; this extended vocal bout took place on a full moon night. Vocalizations often accompanied scent marking activity.

Discussion

These results represent the first ecological data on this species. The limitations of this study mean that results may not be representative of the species' ecology in natural, un-disturbed habitats, but do provide much needed preliminary data. Studies of strictly nocturnal night monkey species using direct observation are extremely difficult. This was made more difficult in the rugged cloud forest habitat of Aotus miconax. Continuous scan sampling has been used successfully in a previous study of A. lemurinus [24] and provides a simple and effective way of calculating activity budgets when recognition of individual animals is not feasible. Our results are preliminary and as such provide only baseline information for future studies. It is likely that the non-significant correlations and differences reported here are due to small sample size. Similarly, group scan sampling biases against rare behaviors.

Published activity budgets for Aotus spp. are highly variable [353637]. Our study group spent more time travelling and less time resting than recorded for other species (Table 2). In a study of Aotus lemurinus in Colombia [24], the only other Aotus species restricted to high elevations, a similarly low percentage of time was spent in resting, suggesting extra energetic costs are incurred for successful foraging at high elevation sites. It should be noted that our results probably underestimate time spent resting. On occasions when the group was lost they could have been resting. Conversely we probably overestimate the proportion of conspicuous behaviors. We tried to minimize this with prolonged searches in the area where the group was lost. Not conducting follows between 22:00 hrs and 03:00 hrs will also have biased results towards active behaviors. In the Argentinean Chaco Azara's night monkey (A. azarae azarai) showed peaks of activity during twilight hours, with more time spent resting later in the night [30, 31]. The disturbed and fragmented nature of the habitat may have contributed to the greater time dedicated to active behaviors, although this could be counterbalanced by secondary forests generally having higher primary production levels than primary forests [38] and by small fragments reducing travel distances and range sizes.

Table 2.

Activity budgets for night monkey species.

10.1177_194008291300600104-table2.tif

Quantifying dietary intake of strictly nocturnal Aotus spp. presents many difficulties. Our results are similar to those from previous studies, showing a predominantly frugivorous diet. Leaf consumption has also been regularly observed, although A. a azarae and Panamanian night monkey (A. zonalis) showed much higher levels of leaf consumption than we found. These studies did not differentiate between leaves and buds [26]. Insect prey is commonly consumed, although only studies of Brumback's night monkey (A. brumbaki) and A. lemurinus have recorded levels as high as this study, 28 % and 28.2 % respectively [24, 36]; variations in methodologies again limit the possibility of direct comparisons.

Published home range sizes for Aotus species are also variable [24, 26, 35, 36, 39]. Comparisons with results from studies in undisturbed forests are difficult because our study was carried out in an isolated forest patch. Studies of both Aotus azarae boliviensis and A. lemurinus in isolated patches have recorded smaller home ranges [24, 35]. The ability to persist in small fragments suggests that, at least in the short term, Aotus are able to adapt to anthropogenic habitat alteration. Observations of A. miconax have shown adaptability to heavily altered environments [24], living in shade grown coffee plantations (S. Shanee unpublished data) and even displaying terrestriality to access scarce food resources [23]. Night ranges, area used in a single night, for Aotus spp. show less variability than home ranges, with no study recording a night range greater than one ha. The average night range found in this study is within the expected range.

Our estimate of home range size represents a minimum of the actual space used by this group. For example, on a number of occasions the group was seen to descend to the ground and leave the forest patch to access isolated food sources [23]. On another occasion a follow had to be abandoned after the group travelled past the northern edge of the patch where the ground falls away in a vertical rock face. We could not relocate the group that night and assume they descended the cliff face. How much difference this will make in range size is difficult to determine as resources outside of the home patch are scarce and located nearby. These forays outside of the normal home range are probably necessary for the group to survive in the forest patch. The need to utilize resources outside of the group's home patch could have been necessary because of the unusually long dry season during this study.

Fig. 3.

Clockwise from top left: Study group in vine tangle nest (copyright Sam Shanee/NPC); Adult from study group in nest in hollow tree trunk (Copyright Jean Paul Perret/NPC); Undisturbed forest habitat of A. miconax (Copyright Sam Shanee/NPC); Fragmented forests near La Esperanza study site (Copyright Sam Shanee/NPC).

10.1177_194008291300600104-fig3.tif

Implications for conservation

The continued presence and reproduction of Aotus miconax in this heavily disturbed area suggests that the species is able to survive in isolated habitat close to human settlement; therefore the conservation of forest fragments is of importance (Fig. 3). Special emphasis should be made in preserving connectivity to allow genetic flow between groups [15]. Castano et al [24] found similar adaptation to anthropogenic landscapes in A. lemurinus, giving further evidence of the adaptability of Aotus spp.

Even though this and other studies have shown that Aotus spp. have sufficient ecological plasticity to adapt to forest fragmentation, further studies of the species' adaptability to anthropogenic landscapes are needed to aid in conservation planning. Particular attention should be given to the genetic consequences of fragmentation on Aotus spp. We also recommend surveys of wild populations in primary forest sites to provide data on the species' natural ecology.

Acknowledgements:

We wish to thank Armando Caranza-Rojas, Alejandro Mego-Rodriguez, Keefe Keely, Nina Poletti and Thiago Pereira for their help in the field and INRENA/DGFFS for permission to work in Peru (Permits: N° 122-2008-INRENA-IFFS-DCB; N° 102-2009-AG-DGFFS-DGEFFS and N° 384-2010-AG-DGFFS-DGEFFS). This work was funded by Primate Conservation Inc, American Society of Primatologists, Apenhuel Primate Conservation Trust, La Vallee des Singes/Le conservatoire pour la protection des primates, IPPL-US and Wild Futures. We also wish to thank all the authorities and members of the Comunidad Campesina Yambrasbamba for their help and permission to work in the area.

References

1.

Aquino, R., and Encarnacion, F., 1994. Los Primates del Peru. Primate Report. 40:1–127. Google Scholar

2.

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:853–858. Google Scholar

3.

Myers, N., 2003. Biodiversity hotspots revisited. BioScience. 53:916–917. Google Scholar

4.

Butchart, S. H. M., Barnes, R., Davies, C. W. N., Fernandez, M., and Seddon, N., 1995. Observations of two threatened primates in the Peruvian Andes. Primate Conservation. 19:15–19. Google Scholar

5.

Cornejo, F. M., Aquino, R., and Jimenez, C., 2008. Notes on the natural history, distribution and conservation status of the Andean night monkey, Aotus miconax Thomas, 1927. Primate Conservation. 23:1–4. Google Scholar

6.

Thomas, O., 1927. The Godman-Thomas expedition to Peru. On mammals from the Upper Huallaga and neighbouring highlands. Annals and magazine of Natural History. 9:594–608. Google Scholar

7.

Thomas, O., 1927. A remarkable new monkey from Peru. Annals and magazine of Natural History. 9:156–157. Google Scholar

8.

Elgegren, J. J., 2005. La deforestación en el Perú. Consejo Nacional del Ambiente, Lima. Google Scholar

9.

Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informatica (INEI). 2008.  http://www.inei.gob.pe/Google Scholar

10.

Garland, E. B., 1995. The social and economic causes of deforestation in the Peruvian Amazon basin: Natives and colonists. In: The social causes of environmental destruction in Latin America. Painter, M., and Durham, W. H., (Eds), pp.217–246. University of Michigan Press, Michigan. Google Scholar

11.

Schjellerup, I., 2000. La Morada. A case study on the impact of human pressure on the environment in the Ceja de Selva, northeastern Peru. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. 29:451–454. Google Scholar

12.

Shanee, S., 2011. Distribution survey and threat assessment of the yellow-tailed woolly monkey (Oreonax flavicauda; Humboldt 1812), Northeastern Peru. International Journal of Primatology. 32:691–707. Google Scholar

13.

Shanee, N., 2012. The dynamics of threats and conservation efforts for the tropical Andes hotspot in Amazonas and San Martin, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Kent University. Google Scholar

14.

Püttker, T., Meyer-Lucht, Y., and Sommer, S., 2008. Effects of fragmentation on parasite burden (nematodes) of generalist and specialist small mammal species in secondary forest fragments of the coastal Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Ecological Research. 23:207–215. Google Scholar

15.

Marsh, L. K., Ed. 2003. Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. Google Scholar

16.

Brenneman, R. A., Johnson, S. E., Bailey, C. A., Ingraldi, C., Delmore, K. E., Wyman, T. M., Andriamaharoa, H. E., Ralainasolo, F. B., Ratsimbazafy, J. H., and Louis, E. E., 2012. Population genetics and abundance of the Endangered grey-headed lemur Eulemur cinereiceps in south-east Madagascar: assessing risks for fragmented and continuous populations. Oryx. 46:298–307. Google Scholar

17.

Bergl, R. A., Bradley, B. J., Nsubuga, A., and Vigilant, L., 2008. Effects of habitat fragmentation, population size and demographic history on genetic diversity: the cross river gorilla in a comparative context. American Journal of Primatology. 70:848–859. Google Scholar

18.

Perea-Rodriguez, J. P., Milano, A. M., Osherov, B. E., and Fernandez-Duque, E., 2010. Gastrointestinal parasites of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai azarai) in the Argentinian Chaco. Neotropical Primates. 17:7–11. Google Scholar

19.

Wenz, A., Heymann, E. W., Petney, T. N., and Taraschewski, H. F., 2010. The influence of human settlements on the parasite community in two species of Peruvian tamarin. Parasitology. 137:675–684. Google Scholar

20.

Peres, C. A., 2001. Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest vertebrates. Conservation Biology. 15:1490–1505. Google Scholar

21.

Michalski, F., and Peres, C. A., 2005. Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia. Biological Conservation. 124:383–396. Google Scholar

22.

Fahrig, L., 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 34:487–515. Google Scholar

23.

Shanee, S., and Shanee, N., 2011. Observations of terrestrial behavior in the Peruvian night monkey (Aotus miconax) in an anthropogenic landscape, La Esperanza, Peru. Neotropical Primates. 18:55–58. Google Scholar

24.

Castano, J. H., Ramirez, D. C., and Botero, J. E., 2010. Ecologia del mono nocturne Andino (Aotus lemurinus) en fragmentos de bosque subandinos de Colombia. In: Primatologia en Colombia: Avances al principio del milenio. Pereira-Bengoa, P., Stevenson, P. R., Bueno, M. L., and Nassar-Montoya, F., (Eds), pp.67–90. Fundacion Universitaria San Martin, Bogota. Google Scholar

25.

Pyritz, L. W., Buntga, A. B. S., Herzog, S. K., and Kessler, M., 2010. Effects of habitat structure and fragmentation on diversity and abundance of primates in tropical deciduous forests in Bolivia. International Journal of Primatology. 31:796–812. Google Scholar

26.

Fernandez-Duque, E., 2011. Aotinae: Social monogamy in the only nocturnal haplorhines. In: Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., Mackinnin, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. K., (Eds), pp.139–154. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

27.

Fernandez-Duque, E., 2003. Influences of moonlight, ambient temperature, and food availability on the diurnal and nocturnal activity of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 54:431–440. Google Scholar

28.

Ganzhorn, J. U., and Wright, P. C., 1994. Temporal patterns in primate leaf eating: The possible role of leaf chemistry. Folia Primatologica. 63:203–208. Google Scholar

29.

Donati, G., and Borgognini-Tarli, S. M., 2006. From darkness to daylight: Cathemeral activity in primates. Journal of Anthroplogical Sciences. 84:7–32. Google Scholar

30.

Erkert, H. G., Fernadez-Duque, E., Rotundo, M., and Scheideler, A., 2012. Seasonal variation of temporal niche in wild owl monkeys (Aotus azarai azarai) of the Argentinian Chaco: a matter of masking? Chronobiology International. 29:702–714. Google Scholar

31.

Fernandez-Duque, E., and Erkert, H. G., 2006. Cathemerality and lunar periodicity of activity rhythms in owl monkeys of the Argentinian Chaco. Folia Primatologica. 77:123–138. Google Scholar

32.

Campbell, N., 2011. The Peruvian night monkey, Aotus miconax; A comparative study of occupancy between Cabeza del Toro and Cordillera de Colan, Peru. M.Sc dissertation. Oxford Brookes University. Google Scholar

33.

Erkert, H. G., 2004. Chronobiological background to cathemerality. International Journal of Primatology. 75:65. Google Scholar

34.

Altmann, J., 1974. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour. 49:227–266. Google Scholar

35.

Garcia, J., and Braza, F., 1987. Activity rhythms and use of space of a group of Aotus azarae in Bolivia during the rainy season. Primates. 28:337–342. Google Scholar

36.

Solano, C., , 1995. Patron de actividad y área de acción del mico nocturno Aotus brumbacki Hershkovitz, 1983 (Primates: Cebidae) Parque Nacional Tinigua, Meta, Colombia. B.Sc dissertation. Pontifica universidad Javeriana. Google Scholar

37.

Wright, P. C., 1985. The night monkey, genus Aotus. In: Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates. Coimbra-Filho, A. F., and Mittermeier, R. A., (Eds), pp.211–240. Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro. Google Scholar

38.

Lugo, A. E., and frangi, J. L., 1993. Fruit fall in the Luquillo experimental forest, Puerto Rico. Biotropica. 25:73–84. Google Scholar

39.

Wright, P. C., 1994. The behaviour and ecology of the owl monkey. In: Aotus: The Owl Monkey. Baer, J. F., Weller, R. E., and Kakoma, I., (Eds), pp.97–112. Academic Press, San Diego. Google Scholar
© 2013 Shanee Sam, Allgas Nestor, and Shanee Noga. This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ - The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and source of the work. The license ensures that the published article will be as widely available as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers.
Sam Shanee, Nestor Allgas, and Noga Shanee "Preliminary Observations on the behavior and ecology of the Peruvian night monkey (Aotus Miconax: Primates) in a remnant cloud forest Patch, north eastern Peru," Tropical Conservation Science 6(1), 138-148, (18 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600104
Received: 7 November 2012; Accepted: 1 January 2013; Published: 18 March 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top